City of North Miami Beach, Florida Community Development Department

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City of North Miami Beach, Florida Community Development Department City of North Miami Beach, Florida Community Development Department PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT TO: Planning and Zoning Board Members VIA: Justin Proffitt, AICP, Community Development Director Sharon Cino, Planning & Zoning Manager FROM: Mario Duron, AICP Associate Planner DATE: August 10, 2020 RE: Setback Variance for an Atrium at 16454 NE 27th PL, Unit #37 P&Z ITEM # 20-14 Variance for Atrium OWNER(S)/DEVELOPERS OF PROPERTY Vanesa Pirola & Alan Chamo ADDRESS OF PROPERTY 16454 NE 27 PL, Unit #37 FOLIO NUMBER(S) 07-2215-007-0370 EXISTING ZONING RM-19 RESIDENTIAL LOW-RISE MULTIFAMILY (MEDIUM DENSITY) EXISTING LAND USE RESIDENTIAL LOW-RISE MULTIFAMILY FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY REQUEST: The Applicant, Rachel A. Streitfeld, Esq.-Bright Side Legal, representing property owners, Vanesa Pirola & Alan Chamo, are requesting one (1) non-use variance from Section 24-47(D)(4), to permit an Atrium enclosure on the property with a side setback of eight feet and six inches, where twenty feet is the minimum side yard setback required. THE SITE: The Property is located in the Leeward Point Condominium community, which consists of 41 multifamily dwelling units. The community was originally built 1974. The Subject Property, Unit 37 in Leeward Point Condominiums, was purchased by Alan Chamo and Vanessa Pirola in 2015. BACKGROUND: The Atrium for which the non-use variance is being requested has existed on the Property since 1988. Correspondence between Leeward Point Condominium Association and Mr. & Mrs. Merrill, then owners of Unit 37, cite unauthorized, unapproved, and illegal alterations made to the Condominium Property sometime between 1986 and 1988. In June 2015, when Ms. Pirola & Mr. Chamo, purchased the property they were provided an Associate Estoppel indicating Unit 37 had 17050 NE 19th Ave. North Miami Beach, FL 33162 Tel: 305. 948.2966 Fax: 305.787.6012 [email protected] no violations. In 2019, a complaint from an adjacent neighbor prompted an investigation and resulted in a notice of violation by the Building Department for “installation of a glazing enclosure addition in the rear of the property” under BV19-226V. To reconcile the violation and legalize the Atrium enclosure, in March 2020 the Property Owners submitted building permit BM20-518. It was approved by Building (4/2/20) and Structural (5/21/20) but denied by Planning and Zoning. Planning and Zoning did not approve the permit because the Atrium encroaches into the required side yard setback. ZONING: The Property is zoned RM-19 Residential Low-Rise Multifamily (Medium Density) District, and is located in the Western Eastern Shores neighborhood. CODE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST: Staff has reviewed the application for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Board; in this report, Staff presents the applicable Zoning and Land Development Code regulations with recommendations. SURROUNDING ZONING & LAND USES: Future Land Use Location Zoning Designations Existing Land Uses Designations North Conservation Maule Lake Conservation East and West RM-19 - Residential Residential Residential Multifamily Low-Rise Multi-Family Multifamily Medium Density - 19 Units/Ac South B-2 General Business Commercial General Business District Sec. 24-47(B) – RM-19 Residential Low-Rise Multifamily Uses Permitted Use Permitted Existing Recommendation/Comments Multifamily and two-family Multifamily Residential Complies residential dwellings; Dwelling Sec. 24-47(D) – RM-19 Residential Low-Rise Multifamily Site Development Standards Required Existing Recommendation/Comments Maximum density: Nineteen (19) 41 Units dwelling units per net acre. Existing Lot Area: 2.3 acres Min: 9,000 square feet P&Z Item# 20-14 Atrium Variance Lot width: Existing Lot Width Min: 85 feet Minimum Building Setbacks: Requesting non-use . Front 25 FT variance to permit . Rear 25 FT existing 8.5 FT side . Side (2-story) 20 FT setback. Maximum building height: Two-story no change. 3 stories/35 feet Minimum floor area: Unit 37: 1550 SF (Atrium . 1 BDR: 800 SF GFA: 182 SF). Existing . 2 BDR: 1000 SF . 3 BDR: 1200 SF Maximum lot coverage: No Change, Existing 25% Lot Coverage Minimum pervious area: No Change, Existing 30% of the lot Pervious Area PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION ANALYSIS: Staff originally reviewed this item under BM20-518 in May 2020. The permit to legalize the Atrium enclosure was approved by the Building and Structural reviewers but denied by Planning and Zoning. While the Atrium complied with the Florida Building Code per the other disciplines’ review, the enclosure does not comply with the setback requirements set in the Zoning and Land Development Code for properties in the RM-19 zoning district. The variance is being requested because the Atrium encroaches into the side yard setback of the west property line of the Leeward Point Condominium community. Per Section 24-47(D), the two-story structure requires a 20 FT. setback from the side property line. However, at its closest point, the Atrium is 8.5 FT away from the western side property line. Because the Atrium enclosed an existing balcony plus an additional 6 Ft of an existing concrete slab/deck, there were no impacts to pervious area or lot coverage requirements. The following is staff’s review of the non-use variance request. P&Z Item# 20-14 Atrium Variance Figure 1 The green square denotes extent of existing Atrium enclosure within the property limits of Unit 37. The Atrium has an 8.5 FT. setback from the side property line of the Leeward Point Condominium property limits. Variance: A non-use variance from Sec. 24-47(D)(4) to permit an atrium enclosure to have a side setback of 8’-6”, where a twenty (20) foot setback from side property line is required by the Code. In reviewing a variance, city staff utilizes the variance criteria and procedure in Section 24-176. 1. A non-use variance to the terms of this Code that will not be contrary to the public interest may be recommended by the Planning and Zoning Board and granted by the City Council in compliance with the requirements of the City Charter in this Code, upon a showing by the applicant that the nonuse variance maintains the basic intent and purpose of the zoning, subdivision and other land use regulations, which is to protect the general welfare of the public, particularly as it affects the stability and appearance of the community and provided that the non-use variance will be otherwise compatible with the surrounding land uses and would not be detrimental to the community. No showing of unnecessary hardship to the land is required. For the purpose of this subsection, the term "non-use variances" involves matters such as setback lines, frontage requirements, subdivision regulations, height P&Z Item# 20-14 Atrium Variance limitations, lot size restrictions, yard requirements and other variances which have no relation to change of use of the property in question. 2. Appropriate conditions and safeguards, in conformity with the Code, may be prescribed as a condition of the granting of the variance, and violation of such conditions shall be deemed a violation of this Code. 3. The nonconforming use of adjacent lands, structures, or buildings shall not be considered grounds for the authorization of a variance. The applicant has identified the following hardships for the variance request: . The nature of the Property’s location in relation to its neighbors o The Property is structurally connected through shared walls with the neighboring townhomes on both sides. o There is no access to the Atrium through a side yard. Access to the Atrium from the land would require temporary easement or access agreements with at least five neighboring properties. o Existing fences dividing the neighbors' yards would have to be removed for such access. Extreme difficulty of accessing the Atrium for demolition o Requires access to the structure via a floating barge in the canal at the rear of the Property. o Eight neighboring owners have objected to this unnecessary disruption and stating their support for the request. The Applicant requests a variance from Sec. 24-47(D)(4), so that the existing Atrium enclosure can be legalized and permitted as it currently stands. Staff has reviewed the variance request and determined that the Applicant has provided hardships, not self-imposed, which support approval of the non-use variance request in order to legalize and permit the structure. Staff recognizes the alternative for demolition will impact many neighbors and affect their quality of life, and the structural integrity of neighboring homes. Staff finds the request maintains the basic intent of the zoning requirements, as there is a setback provided between the Atrium enclosure and side property line (8.5 FT). The existing setback is further mitigated by the canal that adds additional distance between the side property lines of the neighboring development (‘Lakeview Townhomes’ to the west). This request is not detrimental to the community and does not impact the appearance of the community at-large, as the enclosure is within the rear/backyard area of the property where it fronts a canal. The structure was installed and design in a manner that is architecturally and structurally harmonious to Condominium community and to the surrounding area. P&Z Item# 20-14 Atrium Variance COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends APPROVAL of one (1) non-use variance subject to the conditions contained in the attached draft Resolution. SUBMITTAL HISTORY: BUILDING DEPARTMENT (March 31st, 2020) PLANNING & ZONING BOARD (August 10th, 2020) CITY COMMISSION (TBD) Attachment(s): • Draft Resolution • Letter of Intent and Application Package • Drawings submitted for Building Permit BM20-518 P&Z Item# 20-14 Atrium Variance LOCATION AND AERIAL MAP P&Z Item# 20-14 Atrium Variance ZONING MAP P&Z Item# 20-14 Atrium Variance ADVERTISEMENT P&Z Item# 20-14 Atrium Variance PROPERTY NOTIFICATION SIGN P&Z Item# 20-14 Atrium Variance .
Recommended publications
  • Environmental Design of Atrium Buildings in the U.K
    3300 ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN OF ATRIUM BUILDINGS IN THE U.K. F. Mills Member ASHRAE INTRODUCTION The innovative architects of this period were applying Atrium buildings were first prominent in the U.K. in technology made available by the Industrial Revolution. Victorian times when glazed features were incorporated Iron and glass could provide well lit, comfortable interiors. into building designs to improve daylight quality while pro­ An early example is the gallery at Attingham Park, Shrop­ viding shelter. Many fine examples of this forrn of archi­ shire, by John Nash in 1806. Many more examples follow­ tecture still exist, the most popularly known types being ed in both the U.K. and North America. with perhaps the shopping arcades and main li ne railway terminals. most ambitious project of the period being Paxton's Crystal U.K. developers and their architects, impressed with Palace near London , erected in 1850 but sadly destroyed the success of atria in North America, have adopted this by fire shortly thereafter. approach to U.K. developments and, since 1980, more Despite the obvious success of these early atria, many than 200 examples of various types have been constructed. of which still stand and are considered prestigious build­ The approach to the servicing of these atria has been ings, atria buildings lost favor with architects after 1900. This cautious, with little definitive design guidance in existenca may have resulted from the development of electric light Some early schemes followed the North American ap­ technology, which allowed architects to design buildings proach of heating, ventilating and, in some cases, air without seeking to achieve good daylighting.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT of the POTENTIAL ROLE of LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT in CENTERS
    JULY 2004 ASSESSMENT of the POTENTIAL ROLE of LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT in CENTERS JULY 2004 ASSESSMENT of the POTENTIAL ROLE of LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT in CENTERS Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments.
    [Show full text]
  • V0012775-026 VMS Datasheet Sub-Construction Atrium Ridgelight
    VELUX modular skylights Sub-construction for Atrium Ridgelight Ny Ny Sub-construction for Atrium Ridgelight at 25-45° pitch VELUX modular skylights in an atrium ridgelight solution can be The sub-construction is not included in the VELUX delivery. The installed on a sub-construction made of steel or concrete finished sub-construction as shown in the drawing only represents general with a steel profile. The sub-construction raises the modules above principles and must be designed and dimensioned to fit the specific the roof surface, protecting the construction against water and building project, local architectural style and practice, and the di- drifting snow, and provides the supporting base for the modular rections of other building suppliers. skylights. 2 VELUX Sub-construction for Atrium Ridgelight D: Sub-construction length Axonometric O: Difference in height of sub-construction A: Opening width B: Opening lenght C: Sub-construction width 210 ± 5mm B 210 ± 5mm O min 200mm 210 ± 5mm A C ± 5 210 ± 5mm 210 ± 5mm min 400mm A C ± 5 210 ± 5mm 68mm B 68mm D ± 5 Sub-construction for Atrium Ridgelight VELUX 3 A: Opening width D: Sub-construction length B: Opening lenght O: Difference in height of sub-construction C: Sub-construction width min 200mm 210 ± 5 B 210 ± 5 D ± 5mm 5 ± 210 5 A ± A 5mm C ± C 400 mm 400 mm 5 A A ± 5mm ± C C 5 ± 210 68mm B 68mm O D ± 5mm min 200mm Sub-construction for Atrium Ridgelight VELUX 4 Connecting to the roof The surface on which roofing felt is laid must be prepared according The roofing felt must be applied to the outside of the sub-construc- to applicable standards for roofing materials and best building tion before mounting the skylight modules.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Aspects of Atrium
    International Journal on Engineering Performance-Based Fire Codes, Volume 5, Number 4, p.131-137, 2003 ARCHITECTURAL ASPECTS OF ATRIUM W.Y. Hung Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China ABSTRACT Buildings with atrium can be found everywhere in big cities among which Hong Kong is one of the examples. The evolution of this building type should be traced back to explore the reason why it has been a popular design throughout these years. It was found originated about two hundred years ago, with changes in terms of configurations and functions occurred. After centuries of development, benefits and detriments of atrium could be clearly identified in architectural, environmental and economic aspects respectively, which are discussed in this paper. To get around the demerits brought about by the atrium design in new projects, some design considerations are proposed to be taken into account. Some of the famous local atrium buildings are reviewed to give a clearer picture on the application and design of the building feature. Other than the problems of those aspects mentioned above, fire safety problem is more serious comparatively since human life is involved. The potential fire hazards are discussed. According to local fire codes, atrium buildings are usually installed with sprinkler systems which are used to protect in a wide range of building types. However, with the unique characteristics of large internal open space and high headroom, sprinkler systems can give certain adverse effects where further considerations are essential to ensure fire safety and safeguard occupants’ lives. Keywords: atrium, energy conservation, fire safety, daylight, thermal comfort 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Raheja's Aranya City 2398367 18/09/2012 RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD 215-216, 2ND FLOOR, RECTANGLE-1
    Trade Marks Journal No: 1880 , 17/12/2018 Class 36 Raheja's Aranya City 2398367 18/09/2012 RAHEJA DEVELOPERS LTD 215-216, 2ND FLOOR, RECTANGLE-1. D-4 DISTRICT CENTRE, SAKET NEW DELHI-17 SERVICE PROVIDER A COMPANY IN CORPORATE UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT 1956 Address for service in India/Agents address: BANSAL & BANSAL 210, JOP PLAZA (OPP. MC DONALD"S) P-2, SECTOR-18, NOIDA-201301, NCR DELHI. Used Since :31/03/2012 DELHI REAL ESTATE AFFAIRS. 6053 Trade Marks Journal No: 1880 , 17/12/2018 Class 36 2509323 08/04/2013 IREO GRACE REALTECH PVT LTD 304 KANCHAN HOUSE KARAMPURA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX NEW DELHI 110015 SERVICE PROVIDER Address for service in India/Agents address: KHAITAN & CO. 1105, ASHOKA ESTATE (11TH FLOOR), 24, BARAKHAMBA ROAD, N. DELHI. Used Since :05/12/2012 To be associated with: 2441974, 2441988 DELHI INSURANCE, FINANCIAL AFFAIRS; MONETARY AFFAIRS; REAL ESTATE AFFAIRS INCLUDED UNDER CLASS-36. 6054 Trade Marks Journal No: 1880 , 17/12/2018 Class 36 2633059 26/11/2013 LOCON SOLUTIONS PVT LTD # 3RD FLOOR, BHAVANI INDUSTRIAL ESTATES HARE KRISHAN ROAD (NEAR IIT MAIN GATE) POWAI MUMBAI 400076 SERVICE PROVIDER A PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF INDIA Address for service in India/Attorney address: BALAJI RAMESH M/s. Vedic IP, c-81st Floor, Blaze Business Centre,134 Birla Mansion,Nagindas Master Road, Kalaghoda, Fort, Mumbai- 400 023 Used Since :07/11/2013 MUMBAI FINANCIAL AFFAIRS; MONETARY AFFAIRS; REAL ESTATE AFFAIRS, APARTMENT HOUSE MANAGEMENT, REAL ESTATE AGENCIES, REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, HOUSING AGENTS, RENTING
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Steel Designs for the Massive Atrium Roofs at Orlando's
    Thomas Z. Scarangello, P.E., otel guests usually notice The resort was designed by archi- and Bryan Tokarczyk the size of their rooms, the tects at Hnedak Bobo Group of Mem- quality of the bath towels phis, TN, and structural engineer of and the friendliness of the record Uzun & Case of Atlanta, GA. staff; but rarely is the roof a The entire complex covers 60 acres and Hmajor point of interest. However, when includes 1,400 guest rooms, 200,000 sq. ft a hotel roof spans unsupported across of convention space and 150,000 sq. ft a 10-story-high atrium for several hun- of meeting rooms, in addition to the fa- Innovative steel dred feet, and supports four acres of cility’s signature atria features. The glass, perhaps some people will take central atrium is themed to recall the designs for the note of the structural spectacle. historic Florida city of St. Augustine, Such roof-gazing is entirely plausi- while smaller atria on either side re- massive atrium roofs ble at the new Gaylord Palms Resort semble Key West and the Everglades. and Convention Center in Orlando, FL, Each atrium includes spaces for public at Orlando’s Gaylord where guests have the rare treat of en- entertainment, shopping and dining. joying an airy, sunny, semi-tropical The boundaries of the atria vary from Palms Hotel create Florida environment—in an enclosed adjacent hotel buildings to glass walls bright and airy spaces and air conditioned space. The $350 and open clear spans. million Floridian-themed hotel sur- for guests to enjoy.
    [Show full text]
  • Minneapolis Skyway
    801 MARQUETTE AVE., Minneapolis SUITE 200 Skyway MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 Centered in the heart of bustling Downtown Minneapolis, CommonGrounds’ Skyway location offers as many amenities inside, as it does out. This site includes access to an exclusive sports club, Zipcar rental, a parking ramp, and coffee & wine bar. Being so close to an active part of town, enjoy easy access to the best in local sports, music venues, and fine dining. There’s really no need to look further for your next workplace with the best of the city right at your door. Building Features: • Grand atrium & Skyway access • LEED certified building with 24hr security • Wine & Coffee Bar, and eateries Professional: • Unique living plant wall reception area • Fully furnished offices with 60” sit-stand desks and chairs • Video ready meeting and conference rooms • Collaborative communal areas Worklife: • Community rooftop lounge area • Metro Transit access nearby • Fitness center within building • Skyway access to sports stadiums Copy Shops & Shipping: 1. US Post Office 11. Dakota tools.usps.com Intimate cabaret setting with live (800) 275-8777 music every night Map, parking, transit: 100 N 6th St Ste 120B, (612) 332-1010 Minneapolis, MN 55403 1010 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55402 2. The UPS Store 12. Bob Dylan Mural • Walking distance to light rail stations locations.theupsstore.com 1, S 5th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 cgworkplace.com (801) 363-7100 • Multiple Metro Transit bus line stops 40 S 7th St Ste 212, Minneapolis, MN 55402 Hotels: • Plentiful street parking and secured parking 13. W Minneapolis - The Foshay 3. FedEx Office Print & Ship Center marriott.com garages in the immediate area Local.fedex.com (612) 215-3700 (612) 339-5641 821 S Marquette Ave, 00 1300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55403 Minneapolis, MN 55402 2 Restaurants: 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Largest Indianapolis-Area Multifamily Property Management Firms (Ranked by Local Multifamily Units Managed *)
    Largest Indianapolis-Area Multifamily Property Management Firms (Ranked by local multifamily units managed *) PERCENT OF LOCAL MULTIFAMILY PROPERTIES OWNED OTHER TYPES RANK FIRM UNITS MANAGED:* LOCAL COMPLEXES LARGEST PROPERTIES MANAGED / OF REAL HEAD(S) OF LOCAL ESTAB. 2014 ADDRESS LOCAL MANAGED TYPES OF PROPERTIES UNITS / RENTAL RANGE ESTATE OPERATIONS, LOCALLY rank TELEPHONE / WEBSITE TOTAL FTE LOCAL EMPLOYEES MANAGED FOR TWO-BEDROOM UNIT MANAGED TITLE(S) HQ CITY Kirkpatrick Management Co. Inc. 11,190 0 market rate, Three Fountains / 342 / $533-$744 NA Robert S. Kirkpatrick, 1973 1 5702 Kirkpatrick Way, 46220 14,429 104 sections 8 and 42 Mayfield Green / 344 / $483-$573 president Indianapolis 1 (317) 570-4358 / ekirkpatrick.com DND Harvard Square / 342 / $408-$509 Barrett & Stokely Inc. 8,251 50 market rate, Riley Towers / 525 / $1,309-$2,174 office Alex Stokely, VP; 1975 2 3755 E. 82nd St., Suite 300, 46240 10,589 32 sections 8 and 42, Braeburn Village / 402 / $545-$679 retail John F. Sweeney, DND Indianapolis 2 (317) 845-4171 / barrettandstokely.com DND mixed use, commercial Northlake Village / 348 / $654-$953 Flaherty & Collins Properties 8,187 27 elderly, market rate, Westlake / 1,381 / $519-$679 retail David M. Flaherty, 1993 3 8900 Keystone Crossing, Suite 1200, 46240 15,492 36 sections 8 and 42 Axis / 336 / $1,830-$2,550 CEO; Jerry K. Collins, Indianapolis 4 (317) 816-9300 / flahertycollins.com 450 The Blvd at Anson / 296 / $1,110-$1,410 president Gene B. Glick Co. Inc. 7,057 100 elderly, market rate, Carriage House East I, II, III / 614 / $499-$579 NA David O.
    [Show full text]
  • PNM Office Building
    Boehning, Protz, Cook, Merit Award: New Building Pogue & Associates PNM Phase I Office Building Albuquerque, New Mexico This building is the first phase of a 3-phase office building development to be constructed around Public Service Company's (PNM) 15 year old headquarters tower . This total develop­ ment is called Alvarado Square and incorporates landscaped open space, fountains, and elevated pedestrian walkways (skyways). The building has 293,739 gross square feet, including public spaces, banks, restaurants, speciality shops, atrium, and office space. This building connects to the older headquarters at the 5th, 6th , and 7th floors with a 30' foot long, 3-level glass enclosed bridge. It was the Owners desire that this structure be a keystone to downtown redevelopment, and that it create exciting people oriented spaces. These spaces include a 125' high atrium which has glass elevators , escalators, plants, skylights, and a fountain. A skylit skyway connects the atrium to a parking structure, with restaurants and shops along the way . Ground level has banks, restaurants, and an exterior plaza. The plaza features a splashing fountain with integral ceramic cooling towers , landscaped seating areas, trees, and an elevated outside cafe. The 8-story structure lies horizontally and spans the street using air rights. East window treat­ ment blocks out the sun at all times except early winter mornings , and the stepping southwest walls shade glass below most of the time. The office space incorporates the open office concept for maximum flexibility. Speech privacy is achieved with acoustical screens, high performance ceiling, and electronic sound masking . Computer controlled parabolic light fixtures are used for energy conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Atrium Investment Proposal 1 Office Centre
    ATRIUM INVESTMENT PROPOSAL 1 OFFICE CENTRE 7200 N. MoPac Expwy, Ste 450 Austin, Texas, 78731 512-346-2008 This projection has been developed based upon assumptions relating to the general economy, competition and other factors beyond the control of the preparer and owner of the property and is, therefore, subject to variation. No representation is made by Eurus Capital or the owner as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein, and nothing contained herein should be relied upon as a promise or representation of the future performance of the property. TABLE OF CONTENTS 38 ATRIUM OFFICE CENTRE • AUSTIN, TX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................4 ASSET OVERVIE W.....................................................7 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW...............................................8 LOCATION OVER VIE W.............................................13 MARKE T OVER VIE W...............................................18 ATRIUMMOPAC OFFICE CENTRECENTRE •• AUSTIN,AUSTIN, TXTX 2 3 ATRIUM OFFICE CENTRE • AUSTIN, TX 38 ATRIUM OFFICE CENTRE • AUSTIN, TX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Eurus Capital Partners, LLC has been exclusively retained by the Owner to offer to qualified investors an opportunity to invest in Atrium Office Centre (“the Proper- ty”), a multi-tenant office project in the North MoPac corridor of Austin, Texas. The building encompasses 121,901 rentable square feet located in the City’s premier, in-fill suburban market at the intersection of US Hwy 183 and MoPac Expressway. The intersection is the
    [Show full text]
  • Western Iran اﯾران ﻏرﺑﯽ
    © Lonely Planet Publications 134 lonelyplanet.com WESTERN IRAN 135 0 200 km Western Iran WESTERN IRAN 0 120 miles To Quba (90km) Ceasefire Line ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﯽ Kura Iÿdîr YEREVAN Aÿrî NARORNO River Mt Ararat (Aÿrî Daÿî) KARABAGH ARMENIA Khankandi BAKU To Erzurum (5137m) (Stepanakert) (120km) Doÿubayazit AZERBAIJAN A Z E R B A I J A N Gürbulak Sangar NAKHCHIVAN Goris From paddy fields to blizzards to the original Garden of Eden, this region will shatter your Bazargan Pars Maku Nakhchivan Kapan River Abad City Battle Site Agarak preconceptions of Iran. Standing at the frontiers with Mesopotamia and Turkey, western Shot Culfa Aras Eskanlu Chaldoran Qareh Kalisa Kordasht Meghri Khudaferin C A S P I A N Lake Bastam Jolfa Iran has witnessed many of civilisation’s great empires, fortunes oscillating between trading Qareh Qarachilar Tatvan WESTERN IRAN Van Van Ziya'eddin Ushtebin S E A Hadiy Kaleybar glories and military decimation. The deeply hospitable region lacks the iconic gem-city sites Khoy St Shahr Duzal Razi Stephanos Norduz Babak Lankaran To Elazîÿ Hošap Castle of central Iran so it’s often skipped by first-time Western visitors. But that makes it all the Castle Tasuj Marand Meshgin (300km) Salmas Payam Shahr Astara Khah Ahar T U R K E Y Haftevan Sufiyan Ardabil more appealing for those who relish delving a little deeper and being the ‘only tourist’. Mamakan Takhti Tabriz Alvares Astara To Šanlîurfa Mingöl Lake Mt Sabalan Lavandevil Osku (350km) Esendere Sero Orumiyeh (4811m) Sara'eyn Fandoqlu Khotbeh Sara Azar Kandovan Sarab Lisar Hakkari
    [Show full text]
  • Roof Above Partnership Preserves Affordable Housing Through $50 Million Purchase of East Charlotte Apartment Community
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Roof Above partnership preserves affordable housing through $50 million purchase of East Charlotte apartment community • Atrium Health, donors, city and county support creative housing solution in Charlotte • Community transition will happen over time with no current residents to be displaced • Rent limits will keep apartments affordable for households earning range of incomes CHARLOTTE, N.C. (Sept. 1, 2020) – With affordable housing disappearing across the country, Roof Above is thrilled to announce its purchase of an entire apartment community that will preserve 341 apartments in east Charlotte for individual and family households earning a range of incomes. In a $50 million deal made possible through a remarkable public-private partnership, Roof Above, Charlotte’s leading provider of services for people experiencing homelessness, has acquired HillRock Estates on 23 acres near Kilborne Drive. Through deed restrictions, Roof Above will ensure the apartments remain affordable for at least 27 years for households earning below the city’s median income. A philanthropic gift of $5 million, the largest single private gift ever received by Roof Above, and a gift of $2 million, both donated anonymously from two Charlotte families, made the deal possible. Atrium Health also was crucial in securing the property, providing a $5 million low-interest loan to Roof Above in exchange for the use of 50 apartments over time to house Atrium workers in need of assistance. Financing also was provided by Bellweather Enterprise through a Fannie Mae loan, as well as the city of Charlotte’s voter-approved Housing Trust Fund. An innovation grant of $600,000 from Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC) and additional philanthropic donations totaling $1 million rounded out the funding for the project.
    [Show full text]