Download Book
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
National Forests in Michigan
OriqiMI from Digitized by Go gle UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NATIONAL FORESTS IN MICHIGAN UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE NORTH CENTRAL REGION • MILWAUKEE, WIS. ON THE COVER. —Great Conglomerate Falls on the Black River. p-3e«M ERRATA Page Line 5 3 97,000,000 should be 45,000,000. 7 4 Porcupine should not be listed vvilh fur bearers. 17 7 Si.o'jld read "the red pine by its ClUoLC"G Cf t»Vj". 44 2-3 Should read "4 rniies east of Munising". UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1941 sEr^ •*«$• . AU TRAIN FALLS ON THE HIAWATHA NATIONAL FOREST. Drama of Michigan Forests DRAMA of the forests of Michigan has been written in several acts THEeach with its colorful pageantry. The action has concerned the magni ficent woodlands of the redman, the rapid depletion of those forests in the last century, and their slow but sure rebuilding in the present. The elusive "northwest passage" to China, Indian furs and Indian souls, iron and land and copper brought the white men to Michigan. In 1621, only 1 year after the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock, young Etienne Brule, protege of Champlain, reached Lake Superior and was disappointed to find its waters fresh. Thirteen years later, Jean Nicolet, another protege of the French governor of Canada, entered the unknown Lake Michigan through the Straits of Mackinac. Though he never found the longed-for route to the Orient, Nicolet did initiate the French fur trade with the Indians in this territory. Heroic followers of Brule and Nicolet were the Jesuit fathers Jogues and Raymbault, who preached to the Ojibwas in 1641 at Sault Ste. -
Trip Summary
FALL IN THE GREAT SMOKIES Trip Summary HIGHLIGHTS • Being surrounded by the blazing glory of the leaves turning • Rafting a fun section of the Pigeon River (suitable for women with no experience) • Visiting Little Greenbrier Community and learning about the people who lived here • Hiking beautiful trails, and enjoying lunch next to a waterfall • Gazing at the view from the hot tub and luxuriating in your own private room Phone: 877-439-4042 Outside the US: 970-833-3132 Email: [email protected] TRIP AT A GLANCE Location: Great Smoky Mountains National Park Activities: Hiking Arrive: Arrive at the Knoxville airport (TYS) by 12:00 pm on Day 1 or, if you're driving, at Metcalf Bottoms Picnic inside the park by 2:00pm. Directions will be sent with the pre-departure document. Depart: At the Knoxville airport by 11:30 am on the last day for flights out after 12:30pm Trip Overview The Great Smoky Mountains National Park is world famous for the diversity of its plant and animal life, the beauty of its ancient mountains, its excellent fall foliage, and many excellent hiking trails (over 900 miles). Designed to give you an overview of one of our most treasured National Parks, hiking there in October is definitely a peak experience. We'll marvel at the fall foliage, hiking at a leisurely pace to enhance our enjoyment of the scenery, take time to take pictures and identify shrubs and trees, and soak our feet in beautiful pools at the edge of waterfalls. Whether you are intrigued by salamanders or birds, waterfalls or mountain vistas, learning about the fascinating cultural history, or just seeking less traveled paths, you will quickly understand why the Great Smokies have been designated both an International Biosphere reserve and a World Heritage Site. -
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT of APPEALS for the THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 10-1265 and 10-2332 MINARD RUN OIL COMPANY; PENNSYLVANIA
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Nos. 10-1265 and 10-2332 MINARD RUN OIL COMPANY; PENNSYLVANIA INDEPENDENT OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION; ALLEGHENY FOREST ALLIANCE; COUNTY OF WARREN, PENNSYLVANIA, v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; TOM TIDWELL, in his official capacity as Chief of the U.S. Forest Service; KENT P. CONNAUGHTON, in his official capacity as regional Forester for the U.S. Forest Service, Eastern Region; LEANNE M. MARTEN, in her official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Allegheny National Forest; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS; ALLEGHENY DEFENSE PROJECT; SIERRA CLUB Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics, Allegheny Defense Project, Sierra Club, Appellants. (Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43 (c)(2)) (Amended Pursuant to the Clerk's Order of June 18, 2010) On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 1-09-cv-00125) District Judge: Honorable Sean J. McLaughlin Argued on January 27, 2011 Before: FUENTES, CHAGARES and ROTH, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: September 20, 2011) Brian J. Sonfield, Esquire Assistant General Counsel United States Department of Agriculture Washington, DC 20250 Ignacia S. Moreno, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Aaron P. Avila, Esquire Ruth Ann Storey, Esquire United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division P.O. Box 663 Washington, DC 20044 2 Lane N. McFadden, Esquire Robert P. Stockman, Esquire (Argued) United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division P.O. Box 23795, L‟Enfant Plaza Station Washington, DC 20026 Counsel for Federal Appellants Timothy M. -
Regulatory Underkill: the Bush Administration's Insidious
Regulatory Underkill: The Bush Administration’s Insidious Dismantling of Public Health and Environmental Protections by William Buzbee, Robert Glicksman, Sidney Shapiro and Karen Sokol A Center for Progressive Regulation White Paper October 2004 Introduction The intended and achieved consequence of this effort In the 1960s and early 1970s, Congress passed a series has been a significant weakening, and in some cases a of path-breaking laws to shield public health and the wholesale abandonment, of many of the vital and statutorily environment from the increasingly apparent dangers created mandated health and safety protections upon which by industrial pollution and natural resource destruction. Since Americans have come to rely. that time, regulated corporations have made determined and For example, the Bush administration has: concerted efforts to use their wealth and political power to diminish or even to eliminate various health, environment, • proposed a rule change that would relieve thousands and safety protections. As is documented in the pages that of coal-fired power plants of their obligations to install follow, the Bush administration has granted regulated entities technology that would reduce—by the tons—emissions of unprecedented license in this area, according corporate harmful airborne pollutants that are significant causes of officials de facto policy-making power while excluding the cancer, neurological disorders, asthma, and lung disease; general public from decision-making to the fullest extent • stopped prosecuting lawsuits -
Conomic Consequences Ercury Toxicity to the Evelo Ln Rain
Cl1 conomic Consequences y ercury Toxicity to the evelo ln rain Public ealth and Economic Consequences of ethyl Mercury Toxicity to the evelo in rai Leonardo Trasande, 1,23,4 Philip J. Landrigan, 1,2 and Clyde Schechter5 'Center for Children's Health and the Environment, Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, and ZDepartment of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA ; 3Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 4Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA ; 5Department of Family Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA U.S. exposure levels. The first of these studies, Methyl mercury is a developmental neurotoxicant . Exposure results principally from consumption a cohort in New Zealand, found a 3-point by pregnant women of seafood contaminated by mercury from anthropogenic (70%) and natural decrement in the Wechsler Intelligence Scale- (30%) sources. Throughout the 1990s, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) made Revised (WISC-R) full-scale IQ among steady progress in reducing mercury emissions from anthropogenic sources, especially from power children born to women with maternal hair plants, which account for 41% of anthropogenic emissions . However, the U.S. EPA recently pro- mercury concentrations > 6 pg/g (Kjellstrom . posed to slow this progress, citing high costs of pollution abatement. To put into perspective the et al. 1986, 1989) . A second study in the costs of controlling emissions from American power plants, we have estimated the economic costs Seychelles Islands in the Indian Ocean found of methyl mercury toxicity attributable to mercury from these plants . -
Clear Skies in Louisiana1
The information presented here reflects EPA's modeling of the Clear Skies Act of 2002. The Agency is in the process of updating this information to reflect modifications included in the Clear Skies Act of 2003. The revised information will be posted on the Agency's Clear Skies Web site (www.epa.gov/clearskies) as soon as possible. CLEAR SKIES IN LOUISIANA1 Human Health and Environmental Benefits of Clear Skies: Clear Skies would protect human health, improve air 2 quality, and reduce deposition of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and mercury. • Beginning in 2020, over $1 billion of the annual benefits of Clear Skies would occur in Louisiana. Every year, these would include: Clear Skies Benefits Nationwide � approximately 200 fewer premature deaths; � over 100 fewer cases of chronic bronchitis; • In 2020, annual health benefits from � over 7,000 fewer days with asthma attacks reductions in ozone and fine particles � approximately 200 fewer hospitalizations and emergency would total $93 billion, including 12,000 room visits; fewer premature deaths, far outweighing � over 32,000 fewer days of work lost due to respiratory the $6.49 billion cost of the Clear Skies symptoms; and program. � approximately 250,000 fewer total days with respiratory- • Using an alternative methodology results related symptoms. in over 7,000 premature deaths prevented and $11 billion in benefits by • Currently, all parishes in Louisiana are expected to meet the 2020—still exceeding the cost of the annual fine particle standard; 10 parishes are not expected to program.3 meet the 8-hour ozone standard. • Clear Skies would provide an additional � However, based on initial modeling, 3 parishes are $3 billion in benefits due to improved projected to exceed the annual fine particle standard by visibility in National Parks and wilderness 4 2020 under the existing Clean Air Act. -
United States Department of the Interior
United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE East Lansing Field Office (ES) 2651 Coolidge Road, Suite 101 IN REPLY REFER TO: East Lansing, Michigan 48823-6316 May 1, 2015 Leslie Auriermno, Forest Supervisor Huron-Manistee National Forests 1755 South Mitchell St. Cadillac, MI 49601-8533 Re: Fonnal Section 7 Consultation on the Huron-Manistee National Forests' Ongoing and Planned Actions- Log# 1O-R3-ELF0-03 Dear Ms. Amiemmo: This letter transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Biological Opinion for the Huron Manistee National Forests' (HMNF) ongoing and planned actions in accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S .C. 1531 et seq.). The HMNF detennined that the proposed actions were "Likely to Adversely Affect" the norihern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). We base the enclosed Opinion on information provided in several documents, including your northern long-eared project matrix and Biological Assessment, the Programmatic Biological Assessment and Opinion for the HMNF's Land and Resource Management Plan, and our April 1, 2015, Conference Opinion. Other sources ofinfonnation include previous telephone conversations, e-mails and meetings. A complete administrative record of this consultation is on file at our East Lansing Field Office. After reviewing the current status of northern long-eared bat, the environmental baseline for the action area, the effects of the proposed action, and the cumulative effects, it is our biological opinion that the action, as proposed, is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of northern long-eared bat With respect to ESA compliance, all aspects of the project description are binding. -
Sylvania Wilderness for More Information, Contacatn: DERSON LAKE BIG DONAHUE LAKE Florence to Big Bateau Lake 34 Rods 36
2 DAMON LAKE Watersmeet 3.5 miles 26 25 30 29 28 27 26 25 Sylvania 30 29 PIT LAKE Wilderness CUTTERS POND 28 ROSS LAKE ALBINO LAKE and Recreation RAVEN LAKE PORCUPINE LAKE HATTIE LAKE 35 Area BIG AFRICAN LAKE 36 31 32 RECORD LAKE 33 PARTRIDGE LAKE GOG-535 MAUD LAKE 34 DOYLE LAKE 35 36 31 32 33 BIG AFRICAN LAKE SNAP JACK LAKE CLEAR LAKE Sylvania RICKLES LAKE Entrance TRAIL LAKE Station HELEN LAKE Clark Lake Campground KERR LAKE WOLF DEER-1 LONG LAKE COYOTE LITTLE TRAIL LAKE 2 WEST BEAR LAKE DEER-2 1 EAST BEAR LAKE PILOT LAKE 6 5 KATHERINE LAKE PORCUPINE-2 4 HIGH LAKE 3 2 HILLTOP LAKE PORCUPINE-1 RACCOON 1 JENNINGS LAKE 6 5 GOG-535 4 BOBCAT LYNX-2 THOUSAND ISLAND LAKE ASH-1 LYNX-1 ASH-2 JAY LAKE ERMINE-2 ERMINE-1 BALSAM-1 COREY LAKE 6320 LILUIS LAKE BALSAM-2 MINK-1 MOUNTAIN LAKE CHICKADEE LAKE LOUISE LAKE MINK-2 BEAR-2 CEDAR-2 PINE-1 CHIPMUNK BEAR-1 11 CEDAR-1 BEAVER-1 12 PINE-2 7 SQUIRREL-2 8 CLARK LAKE 9 DOROTHY LAKEELSIE LAKE 10 SQUIRREL-1 BEAVER-2 LITTLE DUCK LAKE BIRCH 12 CROOKED LAKE FOX-1 7 MAPLE-2 11 8 MAPLE-1 9 FOX-2 MULE LAKE SISKIN LAKE BADGER-1 BADGER-2 DAISY LAKE FISHER-1 9 FISHER-2 3 5 - G HAY LAKE O DEVILS HEAD LAKE G PERCH-1 GERMAIN LAKE TRAPPER LAKE 14 13 PERCH-2 INDIAN LAKE 18 17 16 15 14 MALLARD-1 13 18 17 16 DREAM LAKE MALLARD-2 WHITEFISH LAKE EAST BAY LAKE PIKE-1 LOON LAKE PIKE-2 OSPREY-2 DUCK LAKE 23 BASS LOON 24 OSPREY-1 19 LOIS LAKE 20 DEER ISLAND LAKE 6320 21 22 EAGLE-2 23 24 19 20 Mic EAGLE-1 21 higan MOSS LAKE MAMIE LAKE Wilderness Campsites Wisc FISHER LAKE onsin Boat Landing JOHNSTON SPRINGS Portage Lengths -
2012 Annual Report Preserve
2012 Annual Report Preserve. Protect. Provide. About This Publication Our 2012 Annual Report exists exclusively in digital format, available on our website at www.FriendsOfTheSmokies.org. In order to further the impact of our donors’ resources for the park’s benefit we chose to publish this report online. If you would like a paper copy, you may print it from home on your computer, or you may request a copy to be mailed to you from our office (800-845-5665). We are committed to conserving natural resources in and around Great Smoky Mountains National Park! Board of Directors • Jan. 1, 2012–Dec. 31, 2012 OFFICERS HONORARY BOARD MEMBERS Rev. Dr. Daniel P. Matthews ..........................Chair Sandy Beall (Maryville, TN) Waynesville, NC Mimi Cecil (Asheville, NC) Dale Keasling .........................................Vice Chair Linda Ogle (Pigeon Forge, TN) Knoxville, TN Deener Matthews (Waynesville, NC) Kay Clayton..............................................Secretary Hal Roberts (Waynesville, NC) Knoxville, TN Jack Williams (Knoxville, TN) Stephen W. Woody ...................................Treasurer Asheville, NC EMERITUS BOARD MEMBERS Justice Gary R. Wade ..................... Chair Emeritus Sevierville, TN John Dickson (Asheville, NC) Natalie Haslam (Knoxville, TN) BOARD MEMBERS Mary Johnson (Shady Valley, TN) Nancy Daves (Knoxville, TN) Kathryn McNeil (San Francisco, CA) Vicky Fulmer (Maryville, TN) Judy Morton (Knoxville, TN) Bruce Hartmann (Knoxville, TN) John B. Waters, Jr. (Sevierville, TN) Luke D. Hyde (Bryson City, NC) David White (Sevierville, TN) John Mason (Asheville, NC) Dr. Myron “Barney” Coulter** (Waynesville, NC) Jim Ogle (Sevierville, TN) Leon Jones** Meridith Elliott Powell (Asheville, NC) Wilma Dykeman Stokely** Mark Williams (Knoxville, TN) Lindsay Young** ** Deceased Friends Staff Jim Hart .......................................................President Holly Scott ................................. -
Folklife Sourcebook: a Directory of Folklife Resources in the United States
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 380 257 RC 019 998 AUTHOR Bartis, Peter T.; Glatt, Hillary TITLE Folklife Sourcebook: A Directory of Folklife Resources in the United States. Second Edition. Publications of the American Folklife Center, No. 14. INSTITUTION Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. American Folklife Center. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8444-0521-3 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 172p.; For the first edition, see ED 285 813. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954 ($11, include stock no. S/N 030-001-00152-1 or U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-93280. PUB TYPE Reference Materials Directories/Catalogs (132) EDRS PRICE MFOI/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Archives; *College Programs; Cultural Education; Cultural Maintenance; Elementary Secondary Education; *Folk Culture; Foreign Countries; Higher Education; Library Collections; *Organizations (Groups); *Primary Sources; Private Agencies; Public Agencies; *Publications; Rural Education IDENTIFIERS Ethnomusicology; *Folklorists; Folk Music ABSTRACT This directory lists professional folklore networks and other resources involved in folklife programming in the arts and social sciences, public programs, and educational institutions. The directory covers:(1) federal agencies; (2) folklife programming in public agencies and organizations, by state; (3)a listing by state of archives and special collections of folklore, folklife, and ethnomusicology, including date of establishment, access, research facilities, services, -
102 Stat. 1774 Public Law 100-446—Sept
102 STAT. 1774 PUBLIC LAW 100-446—SEPT. 27, 1988 Public Law 100-446 100th Congress An Act Sept. 27, 1988 Making appropriations for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for [H.R. 4867] *^® fiscal year ending September 30,1989, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That the following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the Department of the Interior and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1989, and for other purposes, nsimely: TITLE I—DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT OF LANDS AND RESOURCES For expenses necessary for protection, use, improvement, develop ment, disposal, cadastral surveying, classification, and performance of other functions, including maintenance of facilities, as authorized by law, in the management of Ismds and their resources under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management, including the general administration of the Bureau of Land Management, $508,462,000, of which not to exceed $1,000,000 to be derived from the specisJ receipt account established by section 4 of the Land and Water C!onservation Fund Act of 1965, as amended (16 U.S.C. 4601-6a(i)), $70,000,000 for firefighting and repayment to other appropriations from which funds were transferred under the author ity of section 102 of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1988, and $23,000,000 for the Auto mated Land and Mineral Record Sjrstem Project shcdl remain avail able until expended: Provided, That appropriations herein made shall not be available for the destruction of healthy, unadopted, wild horses and burros in the care of the Bureau of Land Management or 43 use 1474. -
Community Partnerships for Cultural Participation: Concepts, Prospects, and Challenges
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS FOR CULTURAL PARTICIPATION: CONCEPTS, PROSPECTS, AND CHALLENGES EARLY FINDINGS REPORT The Urban Institute 2100 M Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037 MAY 1999 THE URBAN INSTITUTE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This is the report of early findings from the first year of the Urban Institute’s evaluation of the Lila Wallace–Reader’s Digest Fund’s Community Partnerships for Cultural Participation Initiative. Primary Urban Institute staff for this project are Elizabeth Boris, Project Director; Christopher Walker, Principal Investigator; Maria-Rosario Jackson, Research Associate; Stephanie Scott-Melnyk, Research Associate; and Harry Hatry, Evaluation Specialist. The report was written by Christopher Walker, Elizabeth Boris, Maria-Rosario Jackson, and Stephanie Scott-Melnyk, with assistance from Robin Redford. Carol Steinbach edited the draft; technical assistance in producing the report was provided by Jeffrey Shumway, Pho Palmer, Amy Stackpole, Cory Fleming, Megan Weiss, and Diane Hendricks. The authors would like to thank Tom Brock, Holly Sidford, and Michael Moore of the Lila Wallace–Reader’s Digest Fund for their comments and general guidance. We especially wish to thank all the staff at the participating community foundations who arranged site visits and interviews with local informants. Site visits were conducted by Elizabeth Boris, Chris Walker, Maria-Rosario Jackson, Stephanie Scott-Melnyk, Robin Redford, Harry Hatry, David Stevenson, Linda Lampkin, Daryl Dyer, and Marie Gantz. We would also like to thank the members of our Research Advisory Committee, Prudence Brown, University of Chicago; Paul DiMaggio, Princeton University; Lee Friedman, U.C. Berkeley; James Gibson, D.C. Agenda Project; Nicolás Kanellos, Arte Público Press; Steven Lavine, California Institute of the Arts; Mary Regan, North Carolina Arts Council; John Robinson, University of Maryland; Jocelyn Russell, Freedom Theatre; and Margaret Wyszomirski, Ohio State University.