Planting Resilience
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
STORMWATER CAPTURE MASTER PLAN AUGUST 2015 Prepared for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power in Partnership with Treepeople
STORMWATER CAPTURE MASTER PLAN AUGUST 2015 Prepared for the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power in partnership with TreePeople Contributing consultants: Geosyntec Consultants Cordoba Corp Council for Watershed Health CWE DakeLuna EW Consulting FlowScience HDR Kleinfelder Kris Helm MWH Murakawa Communications M2 Resource Consulting Ron Gastelum STORMWATER CAPTURE MASTER PLAN CONTENTS Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... ES-1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Objective ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Study Area .................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. The Stormwater Message ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1. Target Audiences ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.1. Internal Audience. ..................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2. Technical Advisory Team -
Learn More, Visit: an Detailed Description of the Salmon Life Cycle Follows Action Projects
AnAn IncredibleIncredible JourneyJourney An Incredible Journey NOAA Fisheries West Coast Region About This Book Corresponding Curriculum Copyright © NOAA Fisheries West Coast Region, 2018 NOAA Fisheries is responsible for the stewardship of the Throughout their short lives, salmon complete an To further explore the concepts presented in this book, nation’s ocean resources and their habitat. Our work is incredible journey that is fraught with many natural and download a free copy of the An Incredible Journey guided by two core mandates—to ensure the productivity human-made challenges. While salmon used to return curriculum from www.fisheries.noaa.gov or by contacting Requests for copies of this book should be addressed to: and sustainability of fisheries and fishing communities to rivers and streams in vast numbers every year, many [email protected]. [email protected]. through science-based decision-making and compliance populations are now threatened with extinction. with regulations, and to recover and conserve protected This curriculum resources including marine mammals, sea turtles, and For thousands of years, communities across the globe is designed fish. have relied on salmon as a key component of their for grades 4-5, culture. Communities and governments are rallying and can easily The West Coast Region of NOAA Fisheries works together to save salmon from extinction and restore the be adapted for in Washington, Oregon, California, and Idaho. Our habitat on which salmon depend. grades 3 and 6. research, fisheries management, enforcement, and This book explores each of these topics through vivid Each of the 10 habitat restoration helps recover and conserve illustrations and short text. -
Los Angeles Urban Forest Equity Assessment Report
Los Angeles Urban Forest Equity Assessment Report February 2021 Prepared by: CAPA Strategies v Contents 01 Objectives 05 02 Background 06 Distributional Inequities 06 Towards a More Equitable 10 Distribution of Tree Canopy 03 Approach and Findings 17 Convergent Themes 17 Funding the Future 17 Coordination and Collectivization 18 Community Responsiveness 21 Maintenance and Care 24 Divergent Themes 25 04 Recommendations 29 Equitable Financing 29 Maintenance and Co-ownership 30 Trees as Inclusive Infrastructure 32 What’s Realistic? Replicability and Scalability 34 Building Multi-generational Coalitions 35 Reclaiming the Right-of-Way 37 05 Concluding Considerations 38 40 Photo Credits: Austin Kronig 06 Acknowledgements 07 Appendix 40 2 LA Urban Forest Equity Assessment Report 01 Objectives The purpose of this report is to describe perspectives of the Los Angeles region’s urban forest by those individuals and organizations actively involved in its management. With a focus on urban forest equity, the individuals represent a diverse array of organizations that are attendant to and intersect with the biophysical, social, and/or policy dimensions of trees in the region. A central aim of this report is to support current and future actions that aim to address historic policies and programs that have created a landscape of inequitable access to neighborhood trees, forests, and green spaces, along with the critical green-infrastructure/ecosystem services, such as public health and safety protections, they provide. Through direct interviews with members of a dozen organizations and a review of salient documents, this report reflects a ‘first phase’ of the Urban Forest Equity Visiting Scholars program, which is sponsored by several organizations, some of whom were part of the interview process. -
Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings
View this email in your browser Share this URBAN FORESTRY January 2016 Get Involved! | Resources | Tree Permits | Tree Problems | Home In This Issue Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry Learning Landscapes Plantings, Urban Forestry in the Schoolyard Hiring Youth Conservation Crew (YCC) Summer Crew Leader, Apply by Thursday, March 3, 2016 Upcoming Urban Forestry Workshops, Free and Open to the Public Budget Reductions & Urban Forestry You may have recently heard about the upcoming 5% budget cuts proposed for Parks programs. Among the difficult reductions proposed, Urban Forestry could be effected by elimination of the $185,000 Dutch Elm Disease (DED) Treatment program. The City of Portland has minimized the spread of DED and avoided the decimation of the American elm (Ulmus americana) with a successful elm monitoring and treatment program. Without advanced warning, rapid detection and removal, the American elm could ultimately vanish from our landscape. Eastmoreland, Ladd’s Addition, the South Park blocks, Lents Park, Laurelhurst Park, and Overlook Park are areas where elms play a significant role in neighborhood identity. "Many communities have been able to maintain a healthy population of mature elms through a vigilant program of identification and removal of diseased elms and systematic pruning of weakened, dying or dead branches" -Linda Haugen, Plant Pathologist, USDA Forest Service Eliminating this program will also require adjacent property owners to cover the cost of removing DED- infected street trees themselves. The cut will also reduce citywide 24/7 emergency response to clear roads of trees which have fallen during storms, and reduce regular maintenance of publicly-owned trees- additional activities performed by some of the same staff . -
Tree Canopy Change in Coastal Los Angeles, 2009 - 2014
Cities and the Environment (CATE) Volume 10 Issue 2 Climate Change Adaptation in Article 3 Mediterranean Cities 2017 Tree Canopy Change in Coastal Los Angeles, 2009 - 2014 Dexter H. Locke National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC), [email protected] Michele Romolini Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Michael Galvin SavATree, [email protected] Jarlath P.M. O'Neil-Dunne University of Vermont, [email protected] Eric G. Strauss Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate Recommended Citation Locke, Dexter H.; Romolini, Michele; Galvin, Michael; O'Neil-Dunne, Jarlath P.M.; and Strauss, Eric G. (2017) "Tree Canopy Change in Coastal Los Angeles, 2009 - 2014," Cities and the Environment (CATE): Vol. 10: Iss. 2, Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol10/iss2/3 This Special Topic Article: Climate Change in Mediterranean Cities is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Urban Resilience at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cities and the Environment (CATE) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tree Canopy Change in Coastal Los Angeles, 2009 - 2014 Los Angeles, California is prone to extreme climate events—e.g. drought, wildfires, and floods—that are only expected to increase with climate change. The establishment of green infrastructure, including a stable urban forest, is a strategy to improve resilience not only to these events, but also to contribute to other environmental, social, and economic goals. -
I-Tree Eco As a Tool to Inform Urban Forestry in GB: a Literature Review of Its Current Application Within Urban Forestry Policy and Management Context
i-Tree Eco as a tool to inform urban forestry in GB: a literature review of its current application within urban forestry policy and management context Kathryn Hand and Kieron Doick, 2018 i-Tree Eco Evaluation Part 1: Literature Review Forest Research is the Research Agency of the Forestry Commission and is the leading UK organisation engaged in forestry and tree related research. The Agency aims to support and enhance forestry and its role in sustainable development by providing innovative, high quality scientific research, technical support and consultancy services. 2 | i-Tree Eco evaluation: Lit. review_Final | Hand, K.L & Doick, K.J. | March 2018 i-Tree Eco Evaluation Part 1: Literature Review Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 4 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 6 1.1. Aims and context of this report ..................................................................... 6 2. Introduction to i-Tree Eco .............................................................................. 6 2.1. Development and uptake ............................................................................. 6 2.2. Impacts of previous i-Tree Eco projects .......................................................... 9 3. Urban Forest Policy ...................................................................................... 12 3.1. International ............................................................................................ -
Forests, Trees and Agroforestry: Livelihoods, Landscapes and Governance
CGIAR Research Program 6 Forests, Trees and Agroforestry: Livelihoods, Landscapes and Governance Proposal February 2011 CGIAR Research Program 6 Forests, Trees and Agroforestry: Livelihoods, Landscapes and Governance Proposal February 2011 Table of Contents Abbreviations vi Acknowledgements xvi Executive Summary xvii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Setting the scene 1 1.2 Conceptual framework 7 1.3 The challenges 10 1.4 Vision of success 15 1.5 Strategy for impact 17 1.6 Innovation 20 1.7 Comparative advantage of CGIAR centers in leading this effort 22 1.8 Proposal road map 23 2. Research Portfolio 25 2.1 Component 1: Smallholder production systems and markets 28 2.2 Component 2: Management and conservation of forest and tree resources 60 2.3 Component 3: Landscape management for environmental services, biodiversity conservation and livelihoods 91 2.4 Component 4: Climate change adaptation and mitigation 120 2.5 Component 5: Impacts of trade and investment on forests and people 160 3. Cross-cutting Themes 189 3.1 Gender 189 3.2 Partnerships 200 3.3 Capacity strengthening 208 4. Program Support 215 4.1 Communications and knowledge sharing in CRP6 215 4.2 Monitoring and evaluation for impact 224 4.3 Program management 230 5. Budget 241 5.1 Overview 241 5.2 Assumptions and basis of projections 243 5.3 Composition 247 5.4 Resource allocation 248 Annexes 251 Annex 1. Descriptions of CGIAR centers 251 Annex 2. Consultation process 253 Annex 3. Linkages with other CRPs 255 Annex 4. Sentinel landscapes 262 Annex 5. Assumptions and evidence used to develop 10-year impact projections 274 Annex 6 Statements of Support 279 Annex 7. -
Seattle Urban Forestry Commission
SEATTLE URBAN FORESTRY COMMISSION Weston Brinkley (Position #3 – University), Chair • Sarah Rehder (Position #4 – Hydrologist), Vice-chair Steve Zemke (Position #1 – Wildlife Biologist) • Elby Jones (Position #2 – Urban Ecologist - ISA) Stuart Niven (Position #5 – Arborist – ISA) • Michael Walton (Position #6 – Landscape Architect – ISA) Joshua Morris (Position #7 – NGO) • Steven Fry (Position #8 – Development) Blake Voorhees (Position # 9 – Realtor) • Neeyati Johnson (Position #10 – Get Engaged) Whit Bouton (Position #11 – Environmental Justice - ISA) Jessica Jones (Position # 12 – Public Health) • Shari Selch (Position # 13 – Community/Neighborhood) The Urban Forestry Commission was established to advise the Mayor and City Council concerning the establishment of policy and regulations governing the protection, management, and conservation of trees and vegetation in the City of Seattle April 8, 2020 Meeting Notes Seattle Municipal Tower, Room 2750 (27th floor) th 700 5 Avenue, Seattle Attending Commissioners Staff Weston Brinkley – Chair Sandra Pinto de Bader - OSE Sarah Rehder - Vice-Chair Lyliana Allala - OSE Steven Fry Elby Jones Jessica Jones Guests Stuart Niven Elijah Selch Shari Selch Blake Voorhees Steve Zemke Public None Absent- Excused Whit Bouton Neeyati Johnson Josh Morris Michael Walton NOTE: Meeting notes are not exhaustive. For more details, listen to the digital recording of the meeting at: http://www.seattle.gov/urbanforestrycommission/meetingdocs.htm Call to order Weston called the meeting to order Public comment None Green New Deal briefing Lylianna Allala – Lyli is the Climate Justice Director at OSE. Joined OSE not quite a year ago with a different role and was recently appointed to Climate Justice Director. She is using the foundational work from the City’s Equity and Environmental Initiative and working to incorporate that into the climate work OSE is doing. -
Transferring Water and Climate Resilience Lessons from Australia's Millennium Drought to Southern California
Cities and the Environment (CATE) Volume 10 Issue 2 Climate Change Adaptation in Article 5 Mediterranean Cities 2017 Transferring Water and Climate Resilience Lessons from Australia's Millennium Drought to Southern California Deborah Weinstein Bloome TreePeople, [email protected] Edith de Guzman TreePeople, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate Recommended Citation Weinstein Bloome, Deborah and de Guzman, Edith (2017) "Transferring Water and Climate Resilience Lessons from Australia's Millennium Drought to Southern California," Cities and the Environment (CATE): Vol. 10: Iss. 2, Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol10/iss2/5 This Practitioner Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Urban Resilience at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cities and the Environment (CATE) by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons at Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Transferring Water and Climate Resilience Lessons from Australia's Millennium Drought to Southern California Southern California and Southern Australia are two regions of the world which share many climatic, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics that lend themselves to meaningful exchanges of knowledge and innovations. With the benefit of Australia’s documented experiences, California can learn what solutions worked and did not work in Australia, potentially avoiding major pitfalls. While some changes in California are already underway, many opportunities – and challenges – still remain. California’s policymakers and residents can adopt and adapt the most fitting solutions from Australia’s experience. -
John Bowne Manual for “Grow-Out” School Tree Nursery ______
Brown Bag Lunch Series Urban Forestry Partnerships in Education John Bowne Manual for “Grow-Out” School Tree Nursery ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BASED ON THE JOHN BOWNE HIGH SCHOOL MODEL Flushing, Queens New York City MARCH, 2008 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Why and How the John Bowne High School Project Came About As part of the reauthorization of the 1990 Farm Act, Congress provided $20 million to begin a national tree-planting initiative. The National Tree Trust (NTT) was created to invest and use these funds; as its program was developed, a partnership was established with a number of large forest products companies, such as Georgia Pacific and International Paper. Through this partnership, millions of small tree seedlings were distributed to thousands of locations across the country. Volunteers in rural and exurban areas were able to use the seedlings and successfully execute planting projects; however, in urban areas, this system did not work well because the seedlings were too small to be successfully out-planted in most cities. The grow-out station tree nursery system was established by NTT in the late 1990’s to provide an opportunity for volunteers to create planting projects in urban communities. A three-way partnership was put in place for each chosen project: • NTT provided professional guidance and funding, through a contract with a local not-for- profit organization. • A group with a site where the nursery could be successfully established agreed to provide planning and volunteer labor in caring for the seedlings planted at the site, until they were large enough to be successfully out-planted. All trees were required to be distributed for free and planted on publicly owned land. -
Second Nature
Second Nlature ADAPTINGLAS LANDSCAPE FORSUSTAINABLE LIVING Commentary by Paul Hawken Prefaceby Andy Lipkis Edited by Patrick Condon and StacyMoriarty -!){ 0 Trans-AgencyResoitrces for Enairpnntental , and Eco.nom ir S us t ai n)bi I i ty - ature AdaptingLAs Landscape fo'rSustainable Living utitlt Com(nentary by Pau! Haouken Preface tiy Andy Lipkis Edited bv Patrick Condon andSr".y Moriarty with PS ENTERPRISES Design. blt Deborah Daly -:. ------ .PRtNtEl gy r-lll MWn ITTT llll unnopotiTnituuATER DtsTBtcT 0FIIITHEBN cALtFlRNtA v How to'l(eep Up with Oui Progress. The T.R.E.E.S.Project has a web site http://www.treepeopl,e.org/trees that-details every .aspectof the projelt.The site includes a cistern- model, informzrtion on the demonstration site, this'illustrated book, ?nd L self-guided,HomeForester.workshop with tips for applying the Best Managemen_tPractices (BMPs).It als<tincludes away to stay in touch withJreePeople.Ve look forward to hearing fronl you. 'i. Copyright @lgggbyAndylipkis,TreePeople All righF reserved. N9 part of this work may,be reproduted or tmnsmitted in any fofm by anyYn€ans, electronic or mechanical, includirtg photocopying and recordlng, or by any . information storagr or retrieyal sysiep, qgept as m4y be expresqlypermitte dby ttre 1576 Copyright Act or in wdting by Treefeople. Requists'for such permissions should be addressed to: Treeleople , : ' l26fl Mulholland Dr.,Beveily Hi{s, CA 9O2LO ' (818) 7554ffi,FAX (8r8>753-4625 . [email protected] 1- Contents 7 9 11 21 28 29 30 ;40 41 . Designs ',Site . 1: Single-family Homq Site 43 Site 2: Multi-family Housing Site_ 53 Site 3: Public Site l 64 . -
Growing Greener: Eco-Structure for Climate Resilience Chapters 6-7: Regional & General Resources for Improving Forest Health
Growing Greener: Eco-Structure For Climate Resilience Chapters 6-7: Regional & General Resources For Improving Forest Health April 2013 Credit: Flickr user Yinghai May 2013 The Urban and Community Forestry Climate Preparedness and Response program is funded in partnership between King County, the National Wildlife Federation, and the USDA Forest Service, Urban & Community Forestry Program. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. A special thank you is extended to our project partners, the staff from King County, WA, including Richard Gelb, Matt Kuharic, and Michael Jenkins This guide was developed by Kara E. Reeve, Manager of National Wildlife Federation’s Climate-Smart Communities Program, with support from additional NWF staff including Ian Evans, Patty Glick, Laura Hickey, Ryan Kingston, and Jennifer Murk. Information about NWF’s Climate-Smart Communities Program can be found here: www.nwf.org/climate-smart-communities. 2 Introduction Whether you live in the city overlooking a park, grew up with a backyard tree house, or have hiked in a national forest, you undoubtedly know exactly what poet Joyce Kilmer was feeling when he wrote, "I think that I shall never see a poem as lovely as a tree." Trees are a vital part of our natural world, health, economy, and culture. The ecological benefits of healthy trees, including the habitat, shelter, and food they provide for many birds and small wildlife, are widely known. However, people living in urban areas may not immediately consider the ways in which healthy urban forests are critical Credit: Charlie Archambault infrastructure for human communities, too. For starters, trees are central components of green infrastructure, which is a natural and cost-effective approach that many communities are using to reduce flooding, manage stormwater, improve water quality, and even reduce urban heat.