DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservation Agreement for the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Clark and Nye Counties, Nevada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conservation Agreement for the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Clark and Nye Counties, Nevada CONSERVATION AGREEMENT for the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Clark and Nye Counties, Nevada U.S. Forest Service Intermountain Region State of Nevada, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Region April 13, 1998 Declaration of Support for the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Conservation Agreement April 13, 1998 We acknowledge and support the cooperative efforts of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service, and Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources that led to development and implementation of the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Conservation Agreement. This agreement fully meets the intent of the National Interagency Memorandum of Understanding (94-SMU-058) to conserve species within their natural ecosystems. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior Bill ossiel, The Nature Conservancy • CONSERVATION AGREEMENT for the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Clark and Nye Counties, Nevada U.S. Forest Service Intermountain Region State of Nevada, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Region April 13, 1998 Table of Contents I. Purpose........................................................................................................................................ II. Involved Parties..............................................................................................................................1 III. Authority.........................................................................................................................................2 IV. Background.................................................................................................................................... 3 Environmental Setting................................................................................................................3 Forest Service Management of the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area ..............3 Ecosystem Management in the Spring Mountains..................................................................7 Other Plans and Programs.........................................................................................................8 V. Species and Habitats Involved......................................................................................................9 Species Named in this Agreement and their Conservation Ranking........................................9 Habitats for the Species of Concern in the Spring Mountains ................................................ I 1 Species of Greatest Management Concern in the Spring Mountains.....................................15 VI. Problems Facing the Species.......................................................................................................19 VII. Conservation Actions that will be Carried Out.........................................................................28 1.0 Project Planning................................................................................................................29 2.0 Inventory............................................................................................................................31 3.0 Monitoring.........................................................................................................................33 4 .0 Protection.......................................................................................................................... 35 5 .0 Restoration........................................................................................................................ 38 6 .0 Research............................................................................................................................ 40 7.0 Education...........................................................................................................................42 VIII. Duration of Agreement...............................................................................................................44 IX. Literature Cited............................................................................................................................45 X. Signatures.....................................................................................................................................48 XI. Appendices................................................................................................................................... 50 Figures 1. Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Management Areas..............................................4 2. Spring Mountains Biodiversity Hotspots and Species of Concern Locations..........................5 Table 1. Species named in the Spring Mountains Conservation Agreement and their distribution across six primary vegetation zones and azonal habitat types............................... 13 n Acknowledgments The U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources appreciate the assistance provided by the following individuals and entities in preparing this Conservation Agreement: Jan Nachlinger, The Nature Conservancy of Nevada; George Austin, Bruce Boyd, and Bret Boyd, Nevada State Museum; Mary Kay Ramsey, formerly with the University of Nevada, Las Vegas; Stuart Weiss, Stanford University; and private researchers Don Sada and Frank Smith. We also acknowledge the many partners and stakeholders - Bureau of Land Management, Clark County, and Southern Nevada Water Authority; and various conservation and wildlife groups, community associations, town boards, mountain residents and commercial operators, off-highway vehicle enthusiasts, climbers, cavern, special use permitees, and wild horse advocates - all have worked together and with the Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, and Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, in the spirit of compromise, to manage and conserve resources in the Spring Mountains. This Conservation Agreement was prepared by Janet Bair, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Sara Mayben, U.S. Forest Service, Spring Mountains National Recreation Area; in coordination with Butch Padilla and Cris Tomlinson, Nevada Division of Wildlife; John Jones, Nevada Division of Forestry; and Glenn Clemmer, Nevada Natural Heritage Program. Additional review and/or technical support was provided by Teresa Prendusi, Dee Gardner, and Kathy Moskowitz, U.S. Forest Service; and Al Pfister, Dolores Savignano, Donna Withers, and Selena Werdon, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. I u Conservation Agreement for the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Clark and Nye Counties, Nevada I. PURPOSE This Conservation Agreement (CA) has been developed to facilitate voluntary cooperation between the U.S. Forest Service (FS), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and State of Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR), in providing long-term protection for the rare and sensitive flora and fauna of the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area (NRA). Successful implementation of protection-oriented resource management in the Spring Mountains will involve consideration of conservation values through early project planning, in conjunction with an ongoing program of species, habitat, and ecosystem inventory, monitoring, protection, restoration, research, and education. Specific actions necessary to implement this program are described in section VII. If successfully implemented, this CA should provide long-term protection for all of the species of concern in the Spring Mountains, and should preclude the future need to list any of these species as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA). Should the terms of this CA not be accomplished, and if declines in species status or habitat quality are documented, the FWS may eventually determine that listing of one or more of these species of concern under the ESA will be necessary to halt and reverse declining status trends. II. INVOLVED PARTIES A. U.S. Forest Service Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, Utah 84401 (801) 625-5605 B. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 1 Office 911 N.E. 1 lth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232 (503) 231-6118 C. Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 123 West Nye Lane Carson City, Nevada 89710 (702) 687-4360 1 M. AUTHORITY The authority for the FWS and the FS to enter into this voluntary CA is in the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended; the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, as amended; the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended, and the Economy Act. The authority for the Nevada DCNR to enter into cooperative agreements with Federal agencies is granted in Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) 232.070. Additional authority is found in a 1994 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among the Departments of Agriculture, Interior, and Commerce, which establishes a general framework for cooperation in management of species that are tending towards Federal listing as threatened or endangered. Addendum 1 of the MOU adds State fish and wildlife agency leaders as cooperators under the representation of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (Appendix A). Three divisions of the Nevada DCNR are involved in implementation of this CA. The responsibility of the Nevada Division of Wildlife (NDOW) is for the management, propagation, and protection of species of fish and wildlife found within the borders of the State, and for regulating
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Correlation of Permian and Pennsylvanian Sections Between Egan Range and Spring Mountains Nevada
    Correlation of Permian and Pennsylvanian Sections Between Egan Range and Spring Mountains Nevada By PATRICK J. BAROSH CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1254-1 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1968 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 10 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract________________________________________________________ I 1 Introduction_ _____________________________________________________ 1 Egan Range____________________________________________ 3 Spring Mountains.________________________________________________ 3 Correlation _______________________________________________________ 3 Comparative ages.________________________________________________ 6 Conclusions.___________________ _ ________________________________ 7 References cited_________________________________________________ 7 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Index map showing location of Egan Range and Spring Mountains ____________________________________________ 12 2. Chart showing correlation of Permian and Pennsylvanian strata in the Egan Range and Spring Mountains..______ 5 in CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY CORRELATION OF PERMIAN AND PENNSYLVANIAN SECTIONS BETWEEN THE EGAN RANGE AND SPRING MOUNTAINS, NEVADA By PATRICK J. BAROSH ABSTRACT The Permian and Pennsylvanian parts of the Bird Spring Formation near Lee Canyon in the northern Spring Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Background of the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area
    American Indian Groups Recent studies of the Great Basin region, which includes the Las Vegas and Pahrump Valleys, have begun to show that people may have lived in this area as far back as 12,000 to 13,000 years ago. When people first began to arrive here, the environment was far more wet and lush than the world we know today. Lakes, playas, and marshes all existed in the area and this abundance of water led to a much greater variety of plants and animals that the people who lived here used. As the environment of the Spring Mountains changed over time, a unique physical history developed that helped it evolve into the fascinating place it is today. As the water began to dry up around 10,000 years ago, the Spring Mountains became isolated from the Great Basin mountain ecosystems and slowly the mountains were surrounded by the drier Mojave Desert. As it became warmer and drier, the mountain range also became isolated biologically. The valley floors surrounding the range act as a barrier to most plant and animal migrations, and thus many of the plants and animals found here today are either relic species or are new or evolved species found only to exist in this area. As the physical environment changed, so did the ways that people lived and used the land. American Indian groups have had a continuous presence in Southern Nevada for thousands of years and believe that the Spring Mountains are where their people were created. Because of this, the mountains are considered to be sacred and very special to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of Nevada Ecoregion 5 Is a Mountainous, Deeply Dissected, and Westerly Tilting Fault Block
    5 . S i e r r a N e v a d a Ecoregions of Nevada Ecoregion 5 is a mountainous, deeply dissected, and westerly tilting fault block. It is largely composed of granitic rocks that are lithologically distinct from the sedimentary rocks of the Klamath Mountains (78) and the volcanic rocks of the Cascades (4). A Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, Vegas, Reno, and Carson City areas. Most of the state is internally drained and lies Literature Cited: high fault scarp divides the Sierra Nevada (5) from the Northern Basin and Range (80) and Central Basin and Range (13) to the 2 2 . A r i z o n a / N e w M e x i c o P l a t e a u east. Near this eastern fault scarp, the Sierra Nevada (5) reaches its highest elevations. Here, moraines, cirques, and small lakes and quantity of environmental resources. They are designed to serve as a spatial within the Great Basin; rivers in the southeast are part of the Colorado River system Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Ecoregions and subregions of the Ecoregion 22 is a high dissected plateau underlain by horizontal beds of limestone, sandstone, and shale, cut by canyons, and United States (map): Washington, D.C., USFS, scale 1:7,500,000. are especially common and are products of Pleistocene alpine glaciation. Large areas are above timberline, including Mt. Whitney framework for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and those in the northeast drain to the Snake River.
    [Show full text]
  • Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist
    STATE OF NEVADA Steve Sisolak, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Bighorn Sheep and Mountain Goat Staff Specialist Pat Jackson, Predator Management Staff Specialist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer and Antelope Staff Specialist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Sarah Hale Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Matt Jeffress Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2018-2019 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for Springs Stewardship Program and Proposed Action Development: Spring Mountains National Recreation Area, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest
    United States Department of Agriculture Framework for Springs Stewardship Program and Proposed Action Development: Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-330 December 2014 Coles-Ritchie, Marc; Solem, Stephen J.; Springer, Abraham E.; Pendleton, Burton. 2014. Framework for Springs Stewardship Program and proposed action development: Spring Mountains National Recreation Area, Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-330. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 63 p. Keywords: Spring stewardship, spring restoration, groundwater dependent ecosystems, watershed management, spring rehabilitation, spring maintenance AUTHORS Marc Coles-Ritchie, Ph.D., is a Vegetation Ecologist with Management and Engineering Technology International, Inc. (METI, Inc.), Salt Lake City, Utah. Stephen J. Solem is a senior advisor for natural resource planning and inventory with Management and Engineering Technology International, Inc. (METI, Inc.), Missoula, Montana. Abraham E. Springer, Ph.D., is a Hydrogeologist and Professor at Northern Arizona University and consultant to Management and Engineering Technology International, Inc. (METI, Inc.), Flagstaff, Arizona. Burton Pendleton, Ph.D., is a Research Ecologist Emeritus with the Rocky Mountain Research Station in Albuquerque, New Mexico. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This effort was accomplished by using funding provided by the Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act conservation initiative (Round 10). Work was performed using In-Service Agreements between the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest and the Rocky Mountain Research Station and under the terms and conditions of Management and Engineering Technologies International, Inc. Contract Number: AG- 3187-C-0028, Order Number: AG-3187-D-10-0126.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Geomorphic History of Lee Canyon, Spring Mountains, Nevada
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 6-1969 Late Cenozoic geomorphic history of Lee Canyon, Spring Mountains, Nevada John Henry Gucwa Pennsylvania State University - Main Campus Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Geology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, and the Sedimentology Commons Repository Citation Gucwa, John Henry, "Late Cenozoic geomorphic history of Lee Canyon, Spring Mountains, Nevada" (1969). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1436. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/3431545 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Pennsylvania State Universiti ( / . The Graduate School Department of Geology and Geophysics Late Cenozoic Geomorphic History of Lee Canyon, Spring Mountains, Nevada A Thesis in ., \ Geology \. \' by I John Henry Gucwa ( Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science June, 1969 · Date of Approval: • Head of the Department~ Geology and Geophysics i ii 1CKNOHLEDGMENTS ( 1be author wishes expressly to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Visitor Guide
    SPRING MOUNTAINS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA 2 0 0 9 - 2 0 1 0 V I S I T O R G U I D E Welcome to the Spring Mountains National Recreation Area This year-round recreation area offers camping, picnicking, hiking, and other activities in the warmer months, and opportunities for snow-based activities in winter. Recreation tips and information in this visitor guide will help you enjoy your visit and protect the Spring Mountains for plants and animals who depend on this “island in the desert.” SPRING MOUNTAINS – MT. CHARLESTON AREA: Visit Kyle and Lee SPRING MOUNTAINS – WEST SIDE: The west side of the Spring Canyons where you will have access to five picnic areas, six developed Mountains, accessed by rugged dirt roads from areas around Pahrump, campgrounds, and over 50 miles of hiking trails, many entering into Cold Creek, and Mountain Springs, offers wide open spaces for off-highway wilderness areas. Paved highways and spectacular scenery create exceptional vehicle (OHV) use and dispersed camping. There are no developed opportunities for scenic driving. campgrounds or picnic areas with restrooms and picnic tables on the west side of the Spring Mountains. HUMBOLDT-TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST • USDA FOREST SERVICE TIPS & MORE HANDY NUMBERS AND WEB SITES EMERGENCY: 911 Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department: 702-229-3111 Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Visitor Information: 702-872-5486 or fs.fed.us/r4/htnf/districts/smnra/ Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Administrative Office: 702 -515-5400 Spring Mountains National Recreation Area Fire Information: 702-631-2350 or www.fs.fed.us./r4/htnf/fire/ Nevada Division of Wildlife (hunting and fishing): 702 -486-5127, www.ndow.org Nevada Highway Patrol: 702-486-4100 or www.nhp.nv.gov National Recreation Reservation Service (campground reservations): 877-444-6777 or www.recreation.gov Weather information: www.weather.gov SUGGESTIONS FOR AN ENJOYABLE TRIP PRIVATE PROPERTY Have a full tank of gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Las Vegas Is Fantastic for Destination Weddings! Residents Enjoy Our Wide-Ranging Venues Too
    LAS VEGAS IS FILLED WITH EXCITING WEDDING DESTINATIONS Las Vegas is fantastic for Destination Weddings! Residents enjoy our wide-ranging venues too. Fabulous hotels and resorts present unimaginable options. Storied Las Vegas chapels and Elvis impersonators provide altogether different choices. We’ve done weddings in Madame Tussauds Wax Museum and are looking forward to our first at the Mob Museum and the Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health. Beyond that, Las Vegas has high-end restaurants, clubs and studios that offer one-of-a-kind packages. But you may be looking for something more picturesque than any of these. You may want your wedding “in a cathedral not built by human hands”. Vegas weddings don’t have to be indoors. With sunny consistent weather, Las Vegas is a perfect place for outdoor weddings. And with hillside locations offering panoramic views, extending forty miles, you can choose among breathtaking backgrounds for your incredible day. Las Vegas weather is magnificent all year round. Our winters average 39ºF / 58ºF (December and January). In summer our mornings and nights are inviting (though in July and August our afternoon temperatures occasionally reach as high as 115ºF). Our breezes and gorgeous sunsets are legendary. Rain is infinitesimal. So terrace, gazebo, garden, lake side, golf course, park, and unique outdoor weddings are always possible – and always romantic! Whether you are hiring someone to arrange a huge wedding, or you’re preparing an intimate ceremony for just your partner and a witness or two, Las Vegas has it all. You can plan with confidence. We’ve officiated weddings while in a Limo travelling the Strip and a helicopter encir- cling the city (neither are technically “outdoors”).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Glenn Dale Richardson Oral History Interview
    Guide to the Glenn Dale Richardson oral history interview This finding aid was created by Miguel Dominguez. This copy was published on July 20, 2020. Persistent URL for this finding aid: http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/f14q77 © 2020 The Regents of the University of Nevada. All rights reserved. University of Nevada, Las Vegas. University Libraries. Special Collections and Archives. Box 457010 4505 S. Maryland Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada 89154-7010 [email protected] Guide to the Glenn Dale Richardson oral history interview Table of Contents Summary Information ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Contents Note ................................................................................................................................ 3 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................. 4 Names and Subjects ........................................................................................................................................ 4 - Page 2 - Guide to the Glenn Dale Richardson oral history interview Summary Information Repository: University of Nevada, Las Vegas. University Libraries. Special Collections and Archives. Creator: Richardson, Glenn Dale, 1937- Contributor: History of Blue Diamond Village in Nevada Oral History Project Title: Glenn Dale Richardson oral history interview ID: OH-02220 Date: 2013 January
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Evolution of the Maynard Lake Fault Within the Left-Lateral
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 8-1-2016 Structural Evolution of the Maynard Lake Fault Within the Left-Lateral Pahranagat Shear Zone, Nevada, USA Mahmud Mustafa Muhammad University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Geology Commons Repository Citation Muhammad, Mahmud Mustafa, "Structural Evolution of the Maynard Lake Fault Within the Left-Lateral Pahranagat Shear Zone, Nevada, USA" (2016). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 2798. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/2798 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Scholarship@UNLV. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF THE MAYNARD LAKE FAULT WITHIN THE LEFT-LATERAL PAHRANAGAT SHEAR ZONE, NEVADA, USA By Mahmud Muhammad Bachelor of Science in Geology Salahaddin University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region-Iraq 2010 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science – Geoscience Department of Geoscience College of Sciences The Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas August 2016 Copyright [2016] by [Mahmud Muhammad] All Rights Reserved Thesis Approval The Graduate College The University of Nevada, Las Vegas May 19, 2016 This thesis prepared by Mahmud Muhammad entitled Structural Evolution of the Maynard Lake Fault Within the Left-Lateral Pahranagat Shear Zone, Nevada, USA is approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science – Geoscience Department of Geoscience Wanda J.
    [Show full text]
  • 160104 ARES BA Revised Per USFWS
    Biological Assessment ARES Regulation Energy Management Project Prepared For: Bureau of Land Management Southern Nevada District Office 4701 North Torrey Pines Drive Las Vegas, NV 89130 BEC Environmental, Inc. Prepared By: BEC Environmental, Inc. 7660 West Sahara Avenue 7660 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 150 Suite 150 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 702.304.9830 October 2014 PO Box 11083 Revised August 2015 Reno, Nevada 89510 775.345.5261 Revised January 2016 www.becnv.com Biological Assessment for ARES REM Project August 2015 Page i of iv Table of Contents ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................... IV 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................. 2 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ACTION AREA .............................. 3 2.1 Proposed Action ................................................................................................. 3 2.1.1 Project Location .................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.2 Project Timing...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Project
    [Show full text]