DOCSLIB.ORG

New Frontier Media Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Frontier Media Inc SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM SB-2 Optional form for registration of securities to be sold to the public by small business issuers Filing Date: 1997-09-10 SEC Accession No. 0000912057-97-030428 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER NEW FRONTIER MEDIA INC /CO/ Business Address 1050 WALNUT ST CIK:847383| IRS No.: 841084061 | State of Incorp.:CO | Fiscal Year End: 0331 STE 301 Type: SB-2 | Act: 33 | File No.: 333-35337 | Film No.: 97678603 BOULDER CO 80302 SIC: 6770 Blank checks 3034440632 Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON SEPTEMBER 10, 1997. REGISTRATION NO. 33- . - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ------------------------------ FORM SB-2 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ------------------------------ NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC. (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter) COLORADO 5190 84-1084061 (State or other jurisdiction (Primary Standard Industrial (I.R.S. Employer of Identification No.) incorporation or organization) Classification Code Number) 1050 WALNUT STREET, SUITE 301 BOULDER, COLORADO 80302 (303) 444-0632 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal place of business) ------------------------------ MICHAEL WEINER 1050 WALNUT STREET, SUITE 301 BOULDER, COLORADO 80302 (303) 444-0632 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) ------------------------------ Copies of all communications to: Issuer's Counsel: Underwriter's Counsel: KENT D. KRAUSMAN, ESQ. DENNIS J. DOUCETTE, ESQ. Krausman, L.L.C. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, LLP 3200 Cherry Creek South Drive, Suite 600 West Broadway, Suite 2600 400 Denver, Colorado 80209 San Diego, California 92101 Telephone: (303) 777-6277 Telephone: (619) 236-1414 Facsimile: (303) 777-8277 Facsimile: (619) 232-8311 APPROXIMATE DATE OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE AFTER THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE. If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, check the following box: / / If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. / / If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. / / If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. /X/ ------------------------------ CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE <TABLE> <CAPTION> PROPOSED PROPOSED MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF SECURITY AMOUNT BEING MAXIMUM OFFERING AGGREGATE OFFERING REGISTRATION BEING REGISTERED REGISTERED(1) PRICE PER SHARE(2) PRICE FEE <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Common Stock, par value $.001 per share..... 1,725,000 $5.00 $8,625,000 $2,614 Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document issuable upon exercise of the Underwriter's Warrants(3)................. 150,000 $6.00 $900,000 $273 Totals...................................... $9,525,000 $2,886 </TABLE> (1) Includes 225,000 shares which the Underwriters have the option to purchase to cover overallotments, if any. (2) Estimated solely for the purpose of computing the amount of the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(a) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. (3) The Company has agreed to sell the Managing Underwriter a Warrant (the "Underwriter's Warrant") for $100 at closing of this offering. The Underwriter's Warrant shall entitle the Managing Underwriter to purchase up to 10 percent of the number of shares of Common Stock purchased by the underwriters in this offering. The Underwriter's Warrant is exercisable at 120 percent of the offering price of the shares of Common Stock being offered hereby, for a period of four years beginning one year from the date of closing of this offering. See "UNDERWRITING." ------------------------------ THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC. CROSS-REFERENCE SHEET <TABLE> <CAPTION> ITEM CAPTION LOCATION OR CAPTION IN PROSPECTUS - ----------- ---------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- <C> <S> <C> 1. Forepart of Registration Statement and Outside Front Cover Page of Prospectus............................ Outside Front Cover Page 2. Inside Front and Outside Back Cover Page of Prospectus.......................................... Inside Front and Outside Back Cover Pages 3. Summary Information and Risk Factors................ Prospectus Summary; Risk Factors 4. Use of Proceeds..................................... Use of Proceeds 5. Determination of Offering Price..................... Cover Page; Risk Factors; Underwriting 6. Dilution............................................ Dilution 7. Selling Security Holders............................ Not Applicable 8. Plan of Distribution................................ Underwriting 9. Legal Proceedings................................... Not Applicable 10. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons............................................. Management; Principal Shareholders 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.......................................... Principal Shareholders 12. Description of Securities........................... Description of Securities 13. Interest of Named Experts and Counsel............... Legal Matters 14. Disclosure of Commission Position on Indemnification for Securities...................................... Part II: Item 24; Item 28 15. Organization Within Last Five Years................. Prospectus Summary; Certain Transactions 16. Description of Business............................. Risk Factors; Business 17. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations.......................................... Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 18. Description of Property............................. Not Applicable 19. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions........................................ Certain Transactions 20. Market for Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters............................................. Description of Securities 21. Executive Compensation.............................. Management--Executive Compensation 22. Financial Statements................................ Financial Statements 23. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure................. Not Applicable </TABLE> SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 1997. INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR MAY OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT BECOMES Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY, NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE UNLAWFUL PRIOR TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY SUCH STATE. PROSPECTUS [LOGO] NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC. SHARES OF COMMON STOCK All of the shares of Common Stock offered hereby are being sold by New Frontier Media, Inc. (the "Company"). Prior to this Offering, a limited public market for the Common Stock of the Company has existed. The Company's Common Stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq "Bulletin Board" under the symbol "NOOF." The last reported sale price of the Common Stock on the Bulletin Board was $5.00 per share. It is currently estimated that the public Offering price will be between $5.00 and $5.50 per share. See "UNDERWRITING" for a discussion of the factors to be considered in determining the public Offering price. The Company has applied to have its Common Stock approved for quotation on the Nasdaq SmallCap market under the symbol "NOOF." THE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Channel Switching-Triggered Charging for Pay-TV Over IPTV
    Channel Switching-Triggered Charging for Pay-TV over IPTV vom Fachbereich Informatik der Technischen Universitat¨ Darmstadt genehmigte Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktor-Ingenieurs (Dr.-Ing.) von Dipl.-Inform. Tolga Arul geboren in Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland Referenten der Arbeit: Prof. Dr. Sorin A. Huss Technische Universitat¨ Darmstadt Asst. Prof. Dr. Abdulhadi Shoufan Khalifa University Abu Dhabi Prof. Dr. Stefan Katzenbeisser Technische Universitat¨ Darmstadt Tag der Einreichung: 18.08.2016 Tag der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ 06.10.2016 Darmstadter¨ Dissertation D 17 Darmstadt 2017 EHRENWÖRTLICHE ERKLÄRUNG Hiermit versichere ich, die vorliegende Arbeit ohne Hilfe Dritter und nur mit den ange- gebenen Quellen und Hilfsmitteln angefertigt zu haben. Alle Stellen, die aus den Quellen entnommen wurden, sind als solche kenntlich gemacht worden. Diese Arbeit hat in glei- cher oder ahnlicher¨ Form noch keiner Prufungsbeh¨ orde¨ vorgelegen. Darmstadt, 18. August 2016 Tolga Arul CHANNEL SWITCHING-TRIGGERED CHARGING FOR PAY-TV OVER IPTV To my family CONTENTS List of Figures vii List of Tables xi Acknowledgments xv Acronyms xvii 1 Introduction1 1.1 Context2 1.1.1 Pricing for Information Goods4 1.1.2 Charging Models for Pay-TV7 1.2 Short-Interval Charging 10 1.2.1 Consumer Opportunities 10 1.2.2 Consumer Challenges 11 1.2.3 Network Operator Opportunities 12 1.2.4 Network Operator Challenges 14 1.3 Objectives and Organization 15 2 Prospects 19 2.1 Market Participants 20 2.2 Market Background 21 2.3 Consumer Perspective
    [Show full text]
  • Program and System Information Protocol Implementation Guidelines for Broadcasters
    ATSC Recommended Practice: Program and System Information Protocol Implementation Guidelines for Broadcasters Document A/69:2009, 25 December 2009 Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc. 1776 K Street, N.W., Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 Advanced Television Systems Committee Document A/69:2009 The Advanced Television Systems Committee, Inc., is an international, non-profit organization developing voluntary standards for digital television. The ATSC member organizations represent the broadcast, broadcast equipment, motion picture, consumer electronics, computer, cable, satellite, and semiconductor industries. Specifically, ATSC is working to coordinate television standards among different communications media focusing on digital television, interactive systems, and broadband multimedia communications. ATSC is also developing digital television implementation strategies and presenting educational seminars on the ATSC standards. ATSC was formed in 1982 by the member organizations of the Joint Committee on InterSociety Coordination (JCIC): the Electronic Industries Association (EIA), the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), the National Cable Telecommunications Association (NCTA), and the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE). Currently, there are approximately 140 members representing the broadcast, broadcast equipment, motion picture, consumer electronics, computer, cable, satellite, and semiconductor industries. ATSC Digital TV Standards include
    [Show full text]
  • IPTV Broadcasting, Protocols and Switching
    IPTVIPTV Broadcasting,Broadcasting, ProtocolsProtocols andand SwitchingSwitching Notes: Silicon-IPTV-Broadcast -1 CourseCourse ObjectivesObjectives When you have completed this course you will be able to • Understand the equipment and software used to deliver IPTV and VoD services • Describe the architecture of a these modern TV services • Compare Cable, over-air terrestrial, satellite and Internet delivery systems • Appreciate the trend in the technologies • Understand addressing schemes for IP network prefix configurations • Examine resilience for MAC/IP mappings for reliable redundancy switching • Select the best routing and switching strategy for server and delivery networks • Analyze protocols used to carry multimedia and troubleshoot services problems • Appreciate how multicast routing protocols function • Specify requirements for firewall transit of video services • Compare how DiffServ, DSCP, RSVP, WFQ, MPLS and 802.1P/Q can provide quality of service • Select the most appropriate quality of service option © Copyright: All rights reserved. Not to be reproduced without prior written consent. Silicon-IPTV-Broadcast -2 Notes: Silicon-IPTV-Broadcast -2 CourseCourse MaterialsMaterials • Course Notes — Copies of all slides and supplemental presentation material © Copyright: All rights reserved. Not to be reproduced without prior written consent. Silicon-IPTV-Broadcast -3 Notes: Silicon-IPTV-Broadcast -3 CourseCourse ContentsContents • Chapter 1 Television Architecture and Evolution • Chapter 2 Broadband Distribution Systems • Chapter 3 IP Delivery of Multimedia Services • Chapter 4 Layer 2 Addressing • Chapter 5 Layer 3 Addressing • Chapter 6 Routing • Chapter 7 Multicasting • Chapter 8 Management of Devices With SNMP • Chapter 9 Next Generation Network Technology • Chapter 10 Customer Home Network • Chapter 11 Industry Trends • Chapter 12 Summary and Evaluation © Copyright: All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Video and Television Technology Newnes Is an Imprint of Elsevier Science
    Dictionary of Video and Television Technology Newnes is an imprint of Elsevier Science. Copyright © 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. [This page intentionally left blank.] No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Recognizing the importance of preserving what has been written, Elsevier Science prints its books on acid-free paper whenever possible. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ISBN: 1-878707-99-X British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The publisher offers special discounts on bulk orders of this book. For information, please contact: Manager of Special Sales Elsevier Science 225 Wildwood Avenue Woburn, MA 01801-2041 Tel: 781-904-2500 Fax: 781-904-2620 For information on all Newnes publications available, contact our World Wide Web home page at: http://www.newnespress.com 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in the United States of America Dictionary of Video and Television Technology Keith Jack Vladimir Tsatsulin An imprint of Elsevier Science Amsterdam Boston London New York Oxford Paris San Diego San Francisco Singapore Sydney Tokyo [This is a blank page.] CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................. vii About the Authors .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Television 2.0: Reconceptualizing TV As an Engagement Medium
    Television 2.0: Reconceptualizing TV as an Engagement Medium by Ivan D. Askwith B.A. Individualized Study (Technology, Media & Culture) Gallatin School of Individualized Study New York University, 2003 SUBMITTED TO THE PROGRAM IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN COMPARATIVE MEDIA STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2007 © 2007 Ivan D. Askwith. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: Program in Comparative Media Studies 10 August 2007 Certified by: //I Henry Jenkins III Peter d;l orez Professor of Humanities Professor of Comparative Media Studies and Literature Co-Director, Comparative Media Studies Accepted by: -:?Z7 MASSACHUSETTS INS - Cee~<Fo < Henryjenkins III OF TECHNOLOGY Petee Florez Professor of Humanities Professor of Comparative Media Studies and Literature IAUG 7 4 2007 Co-Director, Comparative Media Studies VM0E =ES LIIRARIES Television 2.0: Reconceptualizing TV as an Engagement Medium by Ivan D. Askwith Submitted to the Program in Comparative Media Studies on August 10, 2007, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies ABSTRACT Television is in a period of dramatic change. As the mass audience continues to fragment into ever-smaller niche audiences and communities of interest, and new technologies shift control over the television viewing experience from network programmers into the hands of media consumers, television's traditional business models prove themselves increasingly untenable.
    [Show full text]
  • Echostar Satellite L.L.C
    EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. • Englewood, Colorado Statement of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers The firm of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has been retained by EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. to prepare an engineering statement in response to the FCC’s Notice of Inquiry in ET Docket No. 05-182, “Technical Standards for Satellite-Delivered Network Signals.”1 Background In its Notice of Inquiry in ET Docket No. 05-182 (“NOI”), the Commission seeks, among other things, information and comment on current regulations that identify households that are unserved by local analog broadcast television stations in order to determine if the regulations may be accurately applied to local digital broadcast stations for the same purpose. Specifically, the Commission seeks technical information in the following areas: (1) whether a new standard should account for the fact that an antenna can be mounted on a roof or placed in a home and can be fixed or capable of rotating, (2) whether the codified system of “cluster measurements”2 should be amended to create different procedures for determining the requisite digital signal strength, (3) whether a standard should be developed that does not require the presence of a signal of certain strength to ensure that a household can receive a high-quality picture, (4) whether to develop a predictive methodology for determining whether a household is unserved by an adequate digital signal, (5) whether there is wide variation in the ability of reasonably priced consumer digital television (“DTV”) sets to receive over-the-air signals, and (6) whether to account for factors such as building loss, external interference, and clutter.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle News NOW, to Expose Visitors to Multiple Pieces of Content at Once
    Introduction01 SEATTLE CHANNEL 2018 – 2019 Strategic Recommendations 1 Table of Contents 01 INTRODUCTION 3 02 METHODOLOGY 8 03 KEY FINDINGS 12 04 RECOMMENDATIONS 23 05 IMPLEMENTATION 43 06 SUMMARY 46 07 APPENDICES 48 2 Introduction01 INTRODUCTION Category Introduction: 3 3 Introduction01 PROGRAMMING FOR THE PEOPLE: A Brief History of Government Access Television In 1997, network television was king. It was the main source of news, entertainment and sports for most Americans, supplemented by daily newspapers and glossy magazines. As Hap Freund, station manager for Channel 28 (pre-cursor to Seattle Channel) stated, “Channel surfing is an important reality; it’s how most people watch television.” A new development called “the Internet” served as a supplement to television. For the savvy and fortunate few, the world wide web was a platform to connect with others around the globe in just a few keystrokes and clicks of the mouse. Despite these new choices and an array of channels to choose from, the airwaves were dominated by commercial, for-profit content. In the early 1970s, DUCTION the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) laid the groundwork for public- access television by requiring cable companies to provide free access for government, educational, and public purposes.1 Major municipalities across the United States began using this new platform to broadcast the proceedings of city and county government, enabling civic leaders to communicate directly with constituents via government-access TV, in addition to establishing educational and public-access channels. At the heart of this effort to democratize the airwaves were the key American values of transparency, equality and access.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-09-69A1 Rcd.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 09-69 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Implementation of the Child Safe Viewing Act; ) MB Docket No. 09-26 Examination of Parental Control Technologies for ) Video or Audio Programming ) REPORT Adopted: August 27, 2009 Released: August 31, 2009 By the Commission: Chairman Genachowski and Commissioners Copps, McDowell, Clyburn and Baker issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. TELEVISION......................................................................................................................................... 8 A. V-Chip............................................................................................................................................ 11 1. V-chip Data............................................................................................................................... 15 2. Potential Improvements to the V-chip ...................................................................................... 24 a. TV Parental Guidelines....................................................................................................... 25 b. Rating Advertising.............................................................................................................. 32 c. White Listing – Use of Content Descriptors to Select Programming................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cable and Satellite Television Network Tiering and a La Carte Options for Consumers: Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL32398 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Cable and Satellite Television Network Tiering and a la Carte Options for Consumers: Issues for Congress Updated June 9, 2004 Charles B. Goldfarb Specialist in Industrial Organization and Telecommunications Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Cable and Satellite Television Network Tiering and a la Carte Options for Consumers: Issues for Congress Summary Multi-channel (cable and satellite) television is the single largest component of the entertainment sector, generating $48.6 billion in residential subscription revenues and an additional $15.0 billion in advertising revenues in 2002. It is a major source of news and informational programming and diverse entertainment programming, including niche programming. Some consumer advocates complain, however, that, as a result of the industry-wide practice of offering almost all advertiser-supported cable networks in a single tier only, consumers are forced to purchase networks they are not interested in receiving in order to obtain the networks they want. For example, in order for consumers to obtain desired children’s networks, such as Nickelodeon or Discovery Kids, they must purchase the expanded basic service tier that includes networks whose programming some consider not of interest or objectionable. These advocates claim consumers would be better off if they had the option to purchase just the individual cable networks they want (this is frequently
    [Show full text]