Pyramid Lake and the Northern Paiute Struggle for Water and Rights Andrew W
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Anthropology ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2016 Questions of Sovereignty: Pyramid Lake and the Northern Paiute Struggle for Water and Rights Andrew W. Carey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/anth_etds Recommended Citation Carey, Andrew W.. "Questions of Sovereignty: Pyramid Lake and the Northern Paiute Struggle for Water and Rights." (2016). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/anth_etds/79 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Andrew Carey_________________________ Candidate Anthropology_________________________ Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Les Field, Ph.D., Chairperson___________________________________________ Beverly Singer, Ph.D._________________________________________________ Joe Watkins, Ph.D.___________________________________________________ Leah Wilds, Ph.D.____________________________________________________ QUESTIONS OF SOVEREIGNTY: PYRAMID LAKE AND THE NORTHERN PAIUTE STRUGGLE FOR WATER AND RIGHTS BY ANDREW CAREY B.A. ANTHROPOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO, 1988 M.A. ANTHROPOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO, 1996 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ANTHROPOLOGY The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico JULY, 2016 Acknowledgments I would like to thank the members of the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe as well as the members of the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribal Council for their permission and contributions to this research. This project would not have been possible without the experience, opinions and insight of so many tribal members. I would also like to thank the members of my committee, Les Field, Beverly Singer, Joe Watkins, and Leah Wilds for their guidance at critical points in this process. iii Questions of Sovereignty: Pyramid Lake and the Northern Paiute Struggle for Water and Rights ANDREW CAREY B.A., Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, 1988 M.A., Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, 1996 Ph.D., Anthropology, University of New Mexico, 2016 Abstract The current U.S. government policy of Indian Self-Determination is determined by the principle of tribal sovereignty, which defines how issues identified in Indian Country are addressed. However, tribal sovereignty represents an ideal that has regularly been ignored or contested by private and corporate entities, as well as state and federal government agencies. My research explores this case study of the successful assertion of tribal sovereignty by the Pyramid Lake Paiute tribe as they worked to save Pyramid Lake, the spiritual and economic heart of their reservation. The Pyramid Lake Tribe employed several strategies to secure water for Pyramid Lake and to save the endangered endemic species of fish, the cui-ui and Lahonton cutthroat trout, from extinction. They were opposed by an iron triangle composed of the Nevada Group, an interest group of Nevada water users, the Bureau of Reclamation, and Nevada’s congressional delegation which tried to monopolize the waters of the Truckee River. Through numerous court cases and lobbying Congress, the Pyramid Lake Tribe was able to establish that no water issues could be settled without their input. With this iv nearly all stake holders entered into negotiations to reach an agreement that would serve the needs of every group: the Truckee-Carson-Pyramid Lake Negotiated Settlement Agreement, or PL101-618. The Truckee River Operating agreement was then worked out over the next eighteen years to operationalize PL101-618. I also explore the question of “where sovereignty lies,” which has important implications for legitimacy of government. For the U.S. government, sovereignty on the Pyramid Lake Paiute Indian reservation lies with the enrolled members of the tribe; However, there is evidence that for some of the people at Pyramid Lake, sovereignty lies with the families. I suggest this disconnect may drive factional conflict within the Pyramid Lake Tribe, which interferes with tribal governance. The members of the Pyramid Lake Tribe and their council are actively working to find solutions to issues created by the limitations of tribal sovereignty and resolutions to the internal conflict that creates animosity among the tribal members. They favor solutions that do not limit their sovereignty. v CONTENTS 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 The Effort to Save Pyramid Lake ................................................................................................ 8 Objectives and Methodology ..................................................................................................... 12 2. The Concept of Sovereignty ...................................................................................................... 17 Sovereignty ................................................................................................................................ 17 Internal sovereignty ............................................................................................................... 19 External sovereignty .............................................................................................................. 20 Sovereignty Is an Idea ................................................................................................................ 20 History of the Concept ............................................................................................................... 22 Where Does Sovereignty Lie? ................................................................................................ 23 Sovereign Europe vs. the World ............................................................................................ 26 Doctrine of Discovery ............................................................................................................. 27 North America and Tribal Sovereignty ................................................................................... 31 Native American Approaches to Tribal Sovereignty ................................................................. 40 Issues of Tribal Sovereignty ...................................................................................................... 46 3. The Decline and Resurgence of Pyramid Lake Sovereignty ..................................................... 52 Arrival of Europeans and Euro-Americans ................................................................................ 56 The Pyramid Lake Reservation .................................................................................................. 60 At the Reservation...................................................................................................................... 68 Loss of Sovereignty and the Decline of Critical Resources ....................................................... 69 Sovereignty Returns to the Pyramid Lake People ..................................................................... 74 4. Sovereignty in Action, part I ...................................................................................................... 83 Pyramid Lake (Cui-ui Pah) ........................................................................................................ 84 The Pyramid Lake Creation Story: The Stone Mother .............................................................. 85 Saving Pyramid Lake ................................................................................................................. 89 Water Rights Law in the U.S. (Riparian vs. Prior Appropriation) ........................................... 89 Homestead and Desert Land Acts .......................................................................................... 91 The Newlands Project and Derby Dam .................................................................................. 92 The Orr Ditch Decree ............................................................................................................. 94 The Pyramid Lake Tribal Council Takes Action ....................................................................... 98 The Washoe Project ............................................................................................................. 100 The California-Nevada Interstate Compact or the “Bi-State Compact” .............................. 103 vi The Pyramid Lake Government Task Force ......................................................................... 105 The Endangered Species Act ................................................................................................ 108 Native American Rights Fund ............................................................................................... 109 Tribe v. Morton (The Gesell Decision) ................................................................................. 111 Solicitor General Erwin Griswold ......................................................................................... 113 TCID Refuses to comply with the Gesell decision ................................................................ 114