History Lesson: a Race Odyssey, by Mary Lefkowitz. New Haven, CT
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Acad. Quest. (2008) 21:477–481 DOI 10.1007/s12129-008-9079-1 REVIEWS History Lesson: A Race exists, or the one who doesn’t and Odyssey, by Mary Lefkowitz. claims there are only “competing New Haven, CT: Yale narratives”? University Press, 2008, 202 Lefkowitz is a distinguished classi- pp., $25.00 hardbound. cal scholar whose research has been mostly on “the ways in which myth Edward Alexander and empirical reasoning intersect in ancient Greek historical writing, and this is probably why...it seemed only Published online: 4 October 2008 natural to want to find out why some # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008 people firmly believed that Greek philosophy was stolen from Egypt, Truth exists and can be known. even when it so obviously was not.” This once unremarkable conviction Among the believers in and propaga- is at the core of Mary Lefkowitz’s tors of the “Stolen Legacy” myth was compelling first-person narrative of an Africana [sic] studies professor at her decade-long struggle, beginning Wellesley named Anthony Martin, at Wellesley College in the early who was telling his students that nineties but extending well beyond Aristotle was a thief who pilfered the bucolic shores of Lake Waban, books out of the great library of against a cadre of Afrocentrists, Alexandria and then presented their postmodernists, devotees of “com- ideas as his own. The slight difficulty pensatory politics,” and litigious with this myth is that the Alexandria race racketeers. It is a conviction library was not built until after that gives her a distinct advantage Aristotle’s death. But when Lefkowitz over her opponents because it took it upon herself to point this out, prompts the obvious rhetorical ques- she was accused (by Martin and other tion: which of two combatants in a Afrocentrists) of being a racist, a dispute is more likely to be telling the conservative, a Jew, among other truth, the one who believes that truth crimes. Martin is the protagonist of History Edward Alexander is professor emeritus of Lesson’s foundational incident, which English at the University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-4330 USA; [email protected]. took place in a dormitory in October He is co-author, with Richard Dunn and Paul 1991 and provides a nearly perfect Jaussen, of Robert B. Heilman: His Life in Letters (University of Washington Press, forthcoming). existential realization of his belief 478 Alexander that any dispute involving a black aware of the lurid myths about the person must be viewed as a racial origins of Greek philosophy and the incident. Martin, one of a group of responsibility of Jews for the African faculty and students gathered to read slave trade that Martin was teaching in Twelfth Night, left the reading to go his classes, with the help of a text to the men’s room. As he left, Martin published by the Nation of Islam. In was asked by a student dorm officer December 1993 Martin initiated a whose job it was to pose the question frivolous lawsuit against Lefkowitz to unescorted males: “Excuse me, sir, (which dragged on for five years who [sic] are you with?” Martin before being tossed out) for her article would not stoop to explain, but about the “racist” incident and for instead berated the student for being damaging his reputation—by showing “a fucking bitch, a racist, and a him ignorant of history. bigot.” The student, Michelle Plantec, How, Lefkowitz asks, with startling later recalled: “Martin’s reaction was innocence, could such things have very violent. I don’tknowhowto happened at Wellesley, “where we express how violent his reaction was. pride ourselves on being a multicul- Plus, he is a very tall man and he was tural community, with all the values of towering over me, pointing down tolerance and understanding that the into my face, and he wasn’tsaying term implies”? But she has already very nice things. I was very scared answered this question in describing and shaking.” the political movement, which she had Martin, for his part, claimed that her supported, to give black students question was typical of the “bigotry” privileges granted to no other ethnic that pervaded the Wellesley campus. group through “affirmative action and To combat this “racist” assault, he equal opportunity programs.” At marshaled his acolytes among the play Wellesley, these include the right to readers, “the black community,” and appoint one black person to serve on the head of the black student organi- any college committee, and to exclude zation “Ethos” to retaliate against from Ethos and the Africana studies Plantec. Plantec had a nervous break- department anyone not of African down and, after receiving psychiatric descent. But inequality is not the best treatment (a fact widely advertised by school in which to inculcate equality. Martin when he learned of it), dropped It should not have come as a surprise out of school. Particulars of the inci- to Lefkowitz that institutionalized dent did not appear until May 1993, by affirmative action bred, as she herself which time Lefkowitz had become admits, “an affirmative action program Reviews 479 for the rewriting of history.” One demonstrated conclusively that there Wellesley history professor actually was no historical evidence that the came under attack for “hindering Greeks ever stole anything from diversity” by saying the Holocaust Egypt, including their philosophy. was unique. Bernal had gained undeserved au- One question about Martin that thority for his espousal of “the Stolen Lefkowitz does not answer: how did Legacy” because he flew the flag of the author of, among other master- the academic Left, depicted European pieces, The Jewish Onslaught: Des- civilization as a pod of muck, and patches [sic] from the Wellesley claimed to be attacking racial and Battlefront (Majority Press, 1993), religious prejudice—as if this were come to be hired by Wellesley in the only possible explanation for the the first place? Martin was appointed classicists’“pro-Greek” position. in the sixties, when do-gooders at It was not long before the Afrocen- schools across the country were trists trained their guns on Lefkowitz, intent on hiring black faculty without and only a woman of remarkable looking closely at credentials. One courage—she was receiving chemo- wonders—if not for long—whether, therapy for breast cancer at the time— at Wellesley at least, these individuals could have withstood and thrown have come to recognize that they back the assault. The level of dis- confused doing good with feeling course among her attackers is epito- good about what they were doing. mized in the sputtering of historian In 1991 the New Republic sug- Wilson Jeremiah Moses, who called gested that Lefkowitz review a slew her “an obscure drudge in the of books, including the second vol- academic backwaters of a classics ume of Martin Bernal’s Black Athe- department.” In the world of faculty na (Rutgers University Press, 1991), time-servers and timid administrators which argued not merely that Greek (“the most sensitive region of an culture was heavily dependent on academic administration’s anatomy,” earlier cultures in Egypt and the she remarks, “is the institutional Near East, but had been stolen from pocketbook”) bravery is a rare com- Egypt, and that the inhabitants of modity. Lefkowitz’s attackers es- ancient Egypt were Africans. In her poused the (fascist) idea that 1992 review essay, the forerunner of physiology determines culture, so Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism that knowledge of Africa is some- Became an Excuse to Teach Myth as thing you have to be born into, by History (Basic Books, 1996), she African descent. It was a curious 480 Alexander revival of the once-dominant WASP one. A glance at another book about resistance to hiring Jews in English race-thinking among university pro- departments: how could a Jew un- fessors will explain why: it is called derstand or interpret the literature of Hitler’s Professors: The Part of Christendom? In the course of end- Scholarship in Germany’s Crimes less disputes with her adversaries, Against the Jewish People (Yiddish Lefkowitz challenged the multicul- Scientific Institute, 1946), by Max turalist dogma that members of Weinreich. minority groups cannot be racists, History Lesson at its best reminds pointing out that race professionals one of Matthew Arnold. Arnold too like Martin and Wilson had turned defended the Greek classics, not themselves into professional racists. against racist yahoos but against Why, Lefkowitz often asks, did positivism and science. On visiting she feel compelled to get at the truth America he was delighted to find that about the relations between the “in colleges like Smith College in Greeks and the Egyptians? Who Massachusetts, and Vassar College in would be harmed by being taught the state of New York,” young women what is not true? Her question (“the fair host of the Amazons”)were reminds me of an exchange that studying Greek. Arnold also defined once took place over my dinner himself as “a Liberal, yet...a Liberal table between a physician friend tempered by experience, reflection, and the eminent literary scholar and renouncement.” That is almost Robert Heilman. The physician had true of Lefkowitz, except, perhaps, for a Ph.D. in English and had pub- the renouncement. She shows very lished a highly regarded book about powerfully the horrendous effects of Shakespeare when he gave up a liberal shibboleths and nostrums— desirable tenure-line position to start affirmative action, compensatory pol- medical school (at an advanced age). itics, “diversity,” academic freedom to “Whydidyoudoit?” asked Heilman. indoctrinate, multiculturalism, hate “Because I wanted to go into a field speech codes, condescension towards where mistakes have consequences blacks—and yet she can never quite and can be fatal,” was the response.