DOCSLIB.ORG

Orano Canada Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Orano Canada Inc CMD 19-H3.1 File / dossier : 6.01.07 Date: 2019-03-15 Edocs: 5838946 Written submission from Mémoire d’ Orano Canada Inc. Orano Canada Inc. In the Matter of the À l’égard d’ Orano Canada Inc. – Cluff Lake Project Orano Canada Inc. – Projet de Cluff Lake Application for the renewal of the Uranium Demande de renouvellement du permis Mine Decommissioning Licence for the de déclassement de la mine d’uranium de Cluff Lake Project Cluff Lake Commission Public Hearing Audience publique de la Commission May 15, 2019 Le 15 mai 2019 This page was intentionally Cette page a été intentionnellement left blank laissée en blanc Orano Canada Inc. Cluff Lake Project CNSC Commission Member Document Date Submitted: March 15, 2019 One Day Public Hearing Scheduled for May 15, 2019 Request for a Licensing Decision: Renew and Amend Decommissioning Licence UMDL-MINEMILL-CLUFF.01/2019 March 2019 Executive Summary The Cluff Lake Project commenced mining and milling operations in 1980 and over a 22-year operating life mined five ore bodies and produced 28 million kilograms of uranium concentrate (U3O8) and 8,000 troy ounces of gold. Following a comprehensive environmental assessment and licensing process, including extensive public engagement, regulatory approval for decommissioning was granted in 2004 with agreed end-state decommissioning objectives. Physical decommissioning works to achieve long-term decommissioning objectives were completed by 2006. Over the last Cluff Lake licence term, the remaining minor physical decommissioning works were completed and the achievement of decommissioning objectives was demonstrated. Continuous site occupancy ended in 2013 accompanied by a program to decommission infrastructure that had remained in support of on-site monitoring and maintenance crews, and minor remedial works to prepare the site for open public access. In the summers of 2017 and 2018, final earthworks were conducted to ready the site for eventual transfer to the Province of Saskatchewan under the Institutional Control Program (ICP). The Cluff Lake Project marks an important transition in uranium mining. At the beginning of the operations phase, Cluff Lake did not have the full benefit of decommissioning lessons learned in Canada as no previous uranium mine had been successfully decommissioned and standards for decommissioning were in their infancy. The Cluff Lake Project has benefitted from continuity of ownership throughout its entire life cycle, despite name changes from AMOK to COGEMA to AREVA to Orano. The Cluff Lake Project may be considered the first decommissioned uranium mine site of its era in Saskatchewan. The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Comprehensive Study Report in 2003 described the effects of decommissioning as largely positive. Decommissioning involved the removal or stabilization of constructed structures and the reclamation of disturbed areas. Orano’s key objective was to remove, minimize, or control potential contaminant sources and thereby minimize the potential for adverse environmental effects associated with the decommissioned property. Decommissioning was designed to minimize the need for care and maintenance activities and long-term institutional controls taking into consideration socio-economic factors. The objectives for decommissioning have been achieved. Orano has requested that the Commission amend and renew the Cluff Lake Licence for a 5-year term. While retaining CNSC regulatory oversight, the requested amendments administratively prepare for transfer of the Cluff Lake site to the Provincial ICP. The requested amendments reduce the licenced activity, eliminate aspects no longer necessary, acknowledge completion of decommissioning activities, delineate the remaining area requiring future administrative controls, and adjust the required financial guarantee. Although Orano intends to progress quickly towards transferring the Cluff Lake property into the ICP, we acknowledge that additional time is needed for responsible parties to review and accept the long-term monitoring and maintenance plans and associated establishment of institutional control funds prior to transfer into the ICP. Orano Canada Inc. CNSC Commission Member Document Cluff Lake Project Page i One Day Public Hearing Scheduled for May 15, 2019 March 2019 Executive Summary Orano has a strong record of public engagement extending to the pre-mining period. Throughout the decommissioning and post-decommissioning periods, Orano has engaged with local stakeholders to understand their needs and is proud to have been able to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes with key land users. The sufficiency of the Tailings Management Area engineered cover is an important aspect of the successful decommissioning of the site and has been a topic of sustained interest of a community member. Consequently, Orano contracted a review of the studies and evaluations used to both select the Tailings Management Area cover design and assess the current and anticipated long-term performance of the facility. The review is provided as an appendix to this Commission Member Document. Orano Canada Inc. CNSC Commission Member Document Cluff Lake Project Page ii One Day Public Hearing Scheduled for May 15, 2019 March 2019 Executive Summary Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ i 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Decommissioned Cluff Lake Project Overview ................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2.1 Decommissioning Milestones during Current Licence ......................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Licence History ................................................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.3.1 Summary of Commission Decisions ..................................................................................................... 1-7 1.4 Socioeconomics, Community, Land Use ......................................................................................................... 1-8 1.5 Licence Documentation .................................................................................................................................... 1-9 1.5.1 Licensee ............................................................................................................................................... 1-9 1.5.2 Current Licence and Approval .............................................................................................................. 1-9 2 Licence Renewal and Amendment Application ................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Licence Renewal for Five-Year Term ............................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Licence Amendment – Modernize .................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Licensed Activities ................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.2 Operational and Active Decommissioning Sections ............................................................................. 2-2 2.3 Licence Amendment - Authorized Effluent Discharge Limits ........................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Licence Amendment – Detailed Post-Decommissioning Plan ......................................................................... 2-2 2.4.1 Decommissioning Works Completed in Licence Term ......................................................................... 2-3 2.4.1.1 2013 Works Summary ............................................................................................................. 2-3 2.4.1.2 2017/18 Works Summary ........................................................................................................ 2-4 2.4.2 Status of Decommissioning Planning Envelopes ................................................................................. 2-5 2.4.3 Uncertainties Resolved by Follow-up Program .................................................................................... 2-9 2.4.4 Decommissioning Objectives ............................................................................................................... 2-9 2.4.4.1 Achievement of Decommissioning Objectives ....................................................................... 2-10 2.5 Licence Amendment –Location of Licensed Activities ................................................................................... 2-25 2.5.1 Parcels of Land Included .................................................................................................................... 2-25 2.5.2 Parcels of Land Removed .................................................................................................................. 2-26 2.6 Commission Acceptance – Financial Guarantee ........................................................................................... 2-30 3 Performance during Licence Period ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View Annual Report
    The Future is Nuclear 2005 ANNUAL REPORT Bridging the Gene Producing affordable, clean energy while achieving a sustainable balance between increasing electricity demand and environmental stewardship – this is the promise and potential of a future powered by nuclear energy. It’s why a new generation is opting for nuclear as a reliable and secure energy choice. Cameco is poised and ready to support the new generation. We are a company with the expertise and capacity to deliver the benefits of nuclear energy – starting right now. As the world’s largest uranium producer, Cameco already provides about 20% of global uranium production from the richest mines on the planet. We are also expanding our production by developing two new mines. The company is looking ration Gap to the long-term nuclear future, seeking new reserves OUR PROFILE through a global exploration program with emphasis Cameco, with its head office in in North America and Australia. In nuclear fuel Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, is the production, Cameco has 38% of the western world’s world’s largest uranium producer UF6 conversion capacity, and provides conversion as well as a significant supplier of services and fuel fabrication for Candu reactors. conversion services. The company’s Power production rounds out Cameco’s nuclear competitive position is based on its focus, with 1,000 MW of nuclear power in Ontario. controlling ownership of the world’s largest high-grade reserves and low- A new generation, attentive to the wisdom of cost operations. Cameco’s uranium scientists, environmentalists and consumers, products are used to generate clean understands the future is nuclear.
    [Show full text]
  • + 2020 Annual Information Form
    Denison Mines Corp. 2020 Annual Information Form March 26, 2021 ABOUT THIS ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM This annual information form (“AIF”) is dated March 26, Table of Contents 2021. Unless stated otherwise, all of the information in this AIF is stated as at December 31, 2020. About this AIF .................................... 1 About Denison ................................... 6 This AIF has been prepared in accordance with Canadian Developments over the Last Three securities laws and contains information regarding Years ................................................. 8 Denison’s history, business, mineral reserves and The Uranium Industry ........................ 17 resources, the regulatory environment in which Denison Mineral Resources and Reserves 24 does business, the risks that Denison faces and other Mineral Properties ............................. 27 important information for Shareholders. Athabasca Exploration: Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification ........... 102 This AIF incorporates by reference: Denison Operations ........................... 107 Manager of UPC ................................ 111 Denison’s management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2020, Denison Closed Mines Group ........... 112 Environmental, Health, Safety and Denison’s audited consolidated financial Sustainability Matters ........................ 112 statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, Government Regulation .................... 114 Risk Factors ...................................... 120 both of which
    [Show full text]
  • Project Management for Decommissioning of Hope Brook
    Uranium Development & Exploration The Athabasca Basin, Northern Saskatchewan July 2020 | Corporate Update Cautionary Statements & References This presentation and the information contained herein is designed to help you understand management’s current views, and may not be appropriate for other purposes. This presentation contains information relating to other companies and provincial infrastructure, and the plans and availability thereof, derived from third-party publications and reports which Denison believes are reliable but have not been independently verified by the Company. Certain information contained in this presentation constitutes “forward-looking information”, within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and similar Canadian legislation concerning the business, operations and financial performance and condition of Denison. Generally, these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “believes”, or the negatives and / or variations of such words and phrases, or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur”, “be achieved” or “has the potential to”. In particular, this presentation contains forward-looking information pertaining to the results of, and estimates, assumptions and projections provided in, the PFS, including future development methods and plans, market prices, costs
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 1 Photo credits 2 Foreword On 1 June 1960, the newly established Supply Agency of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) started operations, ensuring that all users in the Community received a regular and equitable supply of ores and nuclear fuel. In 2020, the Agency celebrated 60 years of continued operations, demonstrating its resilience, its ability to adapt and its determination to modernise itself. When the COVID-19 crisis hit in March, we protected ESA’s most valuable asset: its staff. The lockdown united us in keeping the spirit of a common effort focused on the Agency’s core objectives and values. The transition to remote working was accompanied by introduction of new working methods, which allowed us to deliver in this challenging time on all the critical core processes: managing nuclear fuel contracts, facilitating the supply chain of medical radioisotopes and analysing market data. The meetings of the Advisory Committee and of the European Observatory on the Supply of Medical Radioisotopes, which were for the first time ever conducted in a remote format, enabled efficient communication and decision-making, as did many meetings with our partners and stakeholders. Our response to the limitations created by the coronavirus pandemic was to take it as an enforced opportunity to accelerate the adoption of new technologies to cut red tape. We expedited investment in the Noemi application that will, for years to come, securely host data from contracts for the supply of nuclear materials and related services. This new IT system will also greatly improve monitoring of the nuclear energy market and production of reports from aggregated data.
    [Show full text]
  • 20170828-Jason-Cameron-Nuclear-Infrastructure-Council-Eng.Pdf
    THE CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION PRESENTATION TO THE USNIC TRADE MISSION TO CANADA Jason Cameron, Vice-President Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission nuclearsafety.gc.ca August 28, 2017 – Ottawa, Ontario Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission • Regulates the use of nuclear energy and materials to protect health, safety, security and the environment • Implements Canada's international commitments on the peaceful use of nuclear energy • Disseminates objective scientific, technical and regulatory information to the public Canada’s nuclear watchdog We will never compromise safety! Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 2 Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission • Established in May 2000, under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act • Replaced the Atomic Energy and Control Board (AECB) under the 1946 Atomic Energy Control Act More than 70 years of ensuring nuclear safety Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 3 CNSC Regulates All Nuclear-Related Facilities and Activities • Uranium mines and mills • Uranium fuel fabrication and processing • Nuclear power plants • Nuclear substance processing • Industrial and medical applications • Nuclear research and educational activities • Transportation of nuclear substances • Nuclear security and safeguards • Export/import control • Waste management facilities …From cradle to grave Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 4 Independent Commission • Quasi-judicial administrative tribunal • Agent of the Government of Canada (the Crown) • Reports to Parliament through Minister of Natural Resources • Commission members are independent and part-time • Commission hearings are public and Webcast • All presentations, including staff’s, are public • Decisions can only be reviewed by Federal Court Transparent, science-based decision-making Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 5 Our Commission Members Dr. Michael Binder President and Chief Executive Officer, CNSC (Term expires May 8, 2018) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Oversight Report for Uranium Mines and Mills in Canada: 2018
    Regulatory Oversight Report for Uranium Mines and Mills in Canada: 2018 Commission Meeting December 12, 2019 CMD 19-M36.A CNSC Staff Presentation e-Doc 5970530 PPTX e-Doc 6018833 PDF Commission Meeting, December 12, 2019 CMD 19-M36.A – 2018 ROR for Uranium Mines and Mills CNSC Regulatory Oversight Reports for 2018 • November 6, 2019: Canadian Nuclear Power Generating Sites: 2018 • November 7, 2019: Use of Nuclear Substances in Canada: 2018 • November 7, 2019: Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Sites: 2018 • December 11, 2019: Uranium and Nuclear Substance Processing Facilities in Canada: 2018 • December 12, 2019: Uranium Mines and Mills in Canada: 2018 Reporting on licensee performance based on CNSC oversight nuclearsafety.gc.ca 2 Commission Meeting, December 12, 2019 CMD 19-M36.A – 2018 ROR for Uranium Mines and Mills Presentation Outline • Errata • CNSC’s regulatory oversight activities • Uranium mine and mill facilities • Performance of uranium mines and mills • Interventions • Conclusions SAG mill used to grind ore at the McArthur River Operation. (Photo source: CNSC) nuclearsafety.gc.ca 3 Commission Meeting, December 12, 2019 CMD 19-M36.A – 2018 ROR for Uranium Mines and Mills Errata – to be corrected before the report is published Appendix B, Table B1, corrected information Facility Safety and control area Date report issued Fitness for Service, Conventional Health and Safety, March 20, 2018 Environmental Protection, Human Performance Management Environmental Protection, Radiation Protection, October 31, 2018 McArthur Conventional Health and Safety River Physical Design, Environmental Protection, Radiation August 8, 2018 Operation Protection, Conventional Health and Safety Environmental Protection October 2, 2018 Emergency Management and Fire Protection January 16, 2019 nuclearsafety.gc.ca 4 Commission Meeting, December 12, 2019 CMD 19-M36.A – 2018 ROR for Uranium Mines and Mills Errata – to be corrected before the report is published Appendix J: Environmental Action Level and Regulatory Exceedances Reported to CNSC.
    [Show full text]
  • Armour Ready Covering All the Bases
    SASKATCHEWAN SPRING 2018 ISSUE 1 VOL. 2 industrywestmagazine.com ARMOUR READY COVERING ALL THE BASES PIPELINE DREAMS BECOME REALITY: UPDATE MINING IN SASKATCHEWAN: LOOKING AHEAD BRANDSPARK 2018 BEST NEW PRODUCT AWARDS YIELDS OPPORTUNITIES MAKE LEGAL A BREEZE IN RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS SUN LIFE FINANCIAL SHINES A LIGHT ON SUSTAINABILITY A START-UP STORY—BEAK’S CHICKEN From inputs to insights. Agrium and PotashCorp are now Nutrien. What do you get when the world’s biggest crop input retailer combines forces with the largest crop nutrient production and distribution operation on Earth? You get an unmatched supply of crop inputs, an extensive and efficient delivery infrastructure, and more than 1,500 retail locations, staffed with generations of farming experts. In the race to feed the world’s exploding population, ours is a whole new business model. Danny Harms Matthew Durdan 3rd Generation Farmer Field Representative Harms Farms Crop Production Services www.nutrien.com Need help building your safety program? Try our online safety tool • Download free, customizable forms for hazard assessment and inspections • Check legislation • Take online training Download the NEW Pillars App! Safety Pillars Check it out now at www.worksafesask.ca or pillars.worksafesask.ca WCB18 FoundationalPillarsAd 8.25x10.75 1.1.indd 1 2018-01-12 2:46 PM INDUSTRYWESTMAGAZINE.COM VOLUME 2, ISSUE 1 – SPRING 2018 PUBLISHER Paul Huber EDITOR Brook Thalgott ART DIRECTOR Kailey Pirlot PHOTOGRAPHY Kristin Ator Shane Luhning Tanya Sharp Karen Webb COVER PHOTOGRAPHY Greg Halinda Photography CONTRIBUTORS Claire Bélanger-Parker Paul Burch Elizabeth Ireland Ryan Jansen Geoff Kirbyson WELCOMEWITH INDUSTRY WEST PUBLISHER, PAUL HUBER Peter Neufeldt Wm.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation to the Canadian Association of Nuclear Host Communities
    CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION nuclearsafety.gc.ca Michael Binder President and Chief Executive Officer Presentation to the Canadian Association of Nuclear Host Communities February 21, 2018 – Ottawa, Ontario nuclearsafety.gc.ca eDOCS: 5437640 The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) Our Mandate Regulates the use of nuclear energy and materials to protect health, safety, and security and the environment Implements Canada's international commitments on the peaceful use of nuclear energy Disseminates objective scientific, technical and regulatory information to the public We will never compromise safety 2 nuclearsafety.gc.ca The CNSC Regulates All Nuclear Facilities And Activities In Canada Uranium mines and mills Nuclear research and educational activities Uranium fuel fabrication and processing Transportation of nuclear substances Nuclear power plants Nuclear security and safeguards Nuclear substance processing Import and export controls Industrial and medical applications Waste management facilities 3 nuclearsafety.gc.ca CNSC Staff Located Across Canada Fiscal year 2017–18 Human resources: 857 full-time equivalents Financial resources: $148 million (~70% cost recovery; ~30% appropriation) Licensees: 1,700 Licences: 2,500 Headquarters (HQ) in Ottawa 4 site offices at power plants Saskatoon Calgary 1 site office at Chalk River 4 regional offices Chalk River HQ Point Lepreau Laval Bruce Darlington Mississauga Pickering 4 nuclearsafety.gc.ca Independent Commission • Quasi-judicial administrative tribunal • Agent of the Crown (duty to consult) • Reports to Parliament through Minister of Natural Resources • Commission members are independent and part-time • Commission hearings are public and Webcast • Staff presentations in public • Decisions are reviewable by Federal Court Transparent, science-based decision making 5 nuclearsafety.gc.ca Commission Members Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Denison Mines Corp
    Denison Mines Corp. 2019 Annual Information Form March 13, 2020 ABOUT THIS ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM This annual information form (“AIF”) is dated March 13, Table of Contents 2020. Unless stated otherwise, all of the information in About this AIF .................................... 1 this AIF is stated as at December 31, 2019. About Denison ................................... 5 Developments over the Last Three This AIF has been prepared in accordance with Canadian Years ................................................. 7 The Uranium Industry ........................ 15 securities laws and contains information regarding Denison’s history, business, mineral reserves and Mineral Resources and Reserves 22 resources, the regulatory environment in which Denison Mineral Properties ............................. 26 does business, the risks that Denison faces and other Athabasca Exploration: Sampling, important information for Shareholders. Analysis and Data Verification ........... 88 Denison Operations ........................... 94 This AIF incorporates by reference: Manager of UPC ................................ 99 Denison Closed Mines Group ........... 99 Denison’s management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2019, Environmental, Health and Safety Matters .............................................. 100 which is available under the Company’s profile on Government Regulation .................... 102 SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and on EDGAR Risk Factors ...................................... 107 (www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml)
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Life Cycle Analysis of Base Load Electricity in Ontario
    [Type text] Canadian Energy Research Institute Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Base Load Electricity Generation in Ontario Seyed Jazayeri Paul Kralovic Afshin Honarvar Abbas Naini Jon Rozhon Rami Shabaneh Thorn Walden Prepared for the Canadian Nuclear Association October 2008 Relevant • Independent • Objective COMPARATIVE LIFE CYLE ASESSMENT (LCA) OF BASE LOAD ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN ONTARIO ii Canadian Energy Research Institute v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................IX LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................XI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..............................................................................................XIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................. XV ES1.1 Background .........................................................................................................xv ES1.2 Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................xv ES1.3 Methodology........................................................................................................xv ES1.4 The Process LCA ................................................................................................. xvi ES2 Power Generation in Canada ................................................................................ xvi ES3
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of Commission Meeting of December 14, 2016
    Canadian Nuclear Commission canadienne de Safety Commission sûreté nucléaire Public meeting Réunion publique December 14th, 2016 Le 14 décembre 2016 Public Hearing Room Salle des audiences publiques 14th floor 14e étage 280 Slater Street 280, rue Slater Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa (Ontario) Commission Members present Commissaires présents Dr. Michael Binder M. Michael Binder Dr. Sandy McEwan Dr Sandy McEwan Ms Rumina Velshi Mme Rumina Velshi Secretary: Secrétaire: Mr. Marc Leblanc M. Marc Leblanc General Counsel: Avocate générale : Ms Lisa Thiele Me Lisa Thiele 613-521-0703 StenoTran www.stenotran.com ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Opening Remarks 1 CMD 16-M66.C 3 Approval of Agenda CMD 16-M68 3 Status Report on Power Reactors CMD 16-M64 13 Written submission from CNSC staff CMD 16-M50/16-M50.A 18 Oral presentation by CNSC staff CMD 16-M50.1 46 Written submission by Canadian Nuclear Workers' Council CMD 16-M50.2 48 Written submission from Northwatch CMD 16-M70/16-M70.A 155 Oral presentation by CNSC staff CMD 16-M70.1 179 Submission from Énergie NB Power CMD 16-M70.2 180 Submission from Canadian Nuclear Laboratories CMD 16-M49/16-M49.A 245 Oral presentation by CNSC staff CMD 16-M49.5/16-M49.5A 270 Presentation by Cameco Corporation CMD 16-M49.3 298 Submission from the Canadian Nuclear Workers' Council iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CMD 16-M49.4/16-M49.4A/16-M49.4B 348 Presentation by AREVA Resources Canada Inc. CMD 16 M49.1 363 Submission from the Saskatchewan Environmental Society and the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation CMD 16-M69 397 Submission from CNSC staff CMD 16-M72 411 Written submission from CNSC staff 1 Ottawa, Ontario / Ottawa (Ontario) --- Upon commencing on Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 8:34 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Procès-Verbal De La Réunion De La Commission Canadienne De Sûreté Nucléaire (CCSN) Tenue Le 21 Janvier 2021
    Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission canadienne de Commission sûreté nucléaire Procès-verbal de la réunion de la Commission canadienne de sûreté nucléaire (CCSN) tenue le 21 janvier 2021 ______________________________________________________________________________ Le 21 janvier 2021 Procès‑verbal de la réunion de la Commission canadienne de sûreté nucléaire (CCSN) tenue le 21 janvier 2021 à compter de 9 h. La réunion est diffusée sur le site Web de la CCSN, et les archives vidéo sont accessibles sur le même site. Le présent procès-verbal reflète à la fois la réunion publique et les délibérations de la Commission découlant de la réunion. Présents : R. Velshi, présidente T. Bérubé S. Demeter M. Lacroix S. McKinnon M. Leblanc, secrétaire D. Saumure, avocat principal − gestionnaire S. Dimitrijevic, C. Moreau et W. Khan, rédacteurs du compte rendu Les conseillers de la CCSN sont : A. Viktorov, H. Davis, H. Robertson, C. Carrier, M. Rickard, A. Levine, R. Jammal, K. Murthy, J. Burta, L. Forrest, M. de Vos, D. Miller, S. Faille, C. Purvis, V. Tavasoli, B. Carroll, S. Langille, K. Heppel-Masys, P. Bourassa, N. Petseva, D. Reinholz et B. Ferguson D’autres personnes contribuent à la réunion : Ontario Power Generation inc. : A. Grace, R. Manley, J. Vecchiarelli et P. Fabian Société d’énergie du Nouveau-Brunswick : N. Reicker et P. Thompson Bruce Power : H. Kleb Laboratoires Nucléaires Canadiens : J. Griffin Global First Power : D. Train Ressources naturelles Canada : D. Cameron Énergie atomique du Canada limitée : S. Quinn SaskPower : I. Harry Société de gestion des déchets nucléaires : D. Wilson Orano Canada inc. : V. Laniece Province de la Saskatchewan : L. Kaskiw Université de la Colombie-Britannique : J.
    [Show full text]