DOCSLIB.ORG

Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Vision, Policies, and Implementation Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Vision, Policies, and Implementation Strategies Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Vision, Policies, and Implementation Strategies City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 1 Outline 1. Regulatory Framework – MHP/DPA Plan Process 2. Community and Stakeholder Feedback 3. Overall Themes for MHP 4. Policy Areas and Recommendations City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 2 I. Regulatory Framework Article 97 of the Massachusetts Constitution “The people shall have the right to clean air and water, freedom from excessive and unnecessary noise, and the natural, scenic, historic and aesthetic qualities of their environment” City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 3 I. Regulatory Framework Tree Massachusetts Article 97: “The people shall have the right to clean air and water, freedom from excessive noise, and the natural, scenic, Constitution historic, and esthetic qualities of their environment; …” US Federal 16 USC 1451 et seq – The Coastal Statutes Zone Management Act of 1972 Colonial Ordinances of 1641 - 1647 Massachusetts Ch. 21A (2006) Ch. 21A § 4A (1979) General Laws Ch. 91 – The Massachusetts Public Waterfront Act (1866) Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Department of Office of Coastal Zone State Agencies Environmental Protection Management Waterways Division Code of 301 CMR 20 – 301 CMR 23 – 301 CMR 25 – 310 CMR 9 – Coastal Zone Review and Approval of Designation of Port Massachusetts Waterways Regulations Management Program Municipal Harbor Plans Areas City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 4 I. Regulatory Framework: What is a Municipal Harbor Plan? A document stating the community’s goals, standards, and policies to guide public and private land use along harbors. If approved by the Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs, the plan will help guide and coordinate local, state and federal actions along the Chelsea Creek waterfront. City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 5 I. Regulatory Framework: What is Chapter 91? Chelsea Chapter 91, the Massachusetts Public Waterfront Act : East Charlestown Boston • Set jurisdictional lines to provide public access to waterways • Preserves and protect the rights of the public • Establishes priority for water-dependent uses Boston • Guarantees that private uses of tidelands and waterways serve a proper public purpose. • Codifies the Public Trust Doctrine of 1641-47 South Filled Tidelands / Boston Ch 91 Jurisdiction Historic Shoreline City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 6 I. Regulatory Framework: What is Chapter 91? Chelsea Where is Chapter 91 jurisdiction Creek along Chelsea Creek? It includes filled tidelands extending up to Chelsea the first public ROW. It is bound by the yellow boundary and the area seaward of it. East Boston Chapter 91 Jurisdiction City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 7 Chelsea Creek I. Regulatory Framework: What DPA is a Designated Port Area? Chelsea • An area regulated to allow specific working port Mystic River industrial uses that need to use the watersheet to DPA operate. East • Land use is limited to Water-Dependent Industrial Charlestown Boston (WDI) uses. East Boston • In a DPA Master Plan, a municipality may request DPA flexibility for certain use standards, but must balance that flexibility with strategic elements that ensure that DPA interests are still protected. Boston South Boston DPA South Boston City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 8 II. Feedback from public engagement What do you like about Chelsea Creek and the planning process? Advocacy for change can work here. • An active interest in changing the character PORT Park wasn't here 10 years ago! of the creek • Opportunities to participate and actually be heard • Seeing evidence of change over time Areas that are open aren't the most • Balance of industry and public access comfortable for pedestrians (e.g. harbor walk.) What frustrates you most about the Chelsea Creek? • No access to the water • Unfriendly pedestrian environment with Clean up wooden abandoned buildings along Marginal St. piles between PORT Park and Greenroots. City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 9 II. Stakeholder feedback: Property and business owners Public access: • Existing public access provided through temporary licenses is of poor quality. • Permanent public access is not permissible within the DPA with the exception of point access. Regulations: • Many temporary licenses are coming up for renewal. • This is an opportunity for re-negotiating terms of public Flex open space, Eastern Salt, Marginal St. access. Jobs: • Some businesses owners are interested in expanding industrial/warehousing operations which would add more jobs along the Creek. Potential for a light industrial uses buffer upland of Marginal St. City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 10 II. Stakeholder feedback: City of Chelsea Public access: • Require a linear harbor-walk on any parcel decommissioned from the DPA. • Require that new development within the DPA provide point access. Regulations: • Align local zoning with statewide regulations and economic development vision for Chelsea Creek. Connected and continuous • Suggest substitutions or amplifications to existing harbor walk Ch91/DPA regulations. • Alter use allocation and rules around points of public access. Jobs: • Interest in maintaining industry which provides living wage jobs in Chelsea, especially a higher concentration of jobs, i.e. processing vs warehousing & distribution. Potential harbor walk between 295 and Forbes site City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 11 II. Stakeholder feedback: DEP / CZM Public access: • Take a point access approach towards public waterfront use in DPA (similar to PORT Park.) • Limit lateral access (waterfront path) to parcels with temporary licenses or those out of the DPA. • Lateral access should be removed when a WDIU is recruited. Temporary harbor walk, 257 Marginal St. Regulations / Industrial Character: • Analyze the existing land use allocations and rebalance the distribution of water-dependent and supporting uses. PORT Park provided as point access on Eastern Salt parcels City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 12 III. Overall Themes and Community Vision Public access Jobs Provide living wage jobs for local residents and Provide public access based on preferences of the businesses/operators that aim for a higher job community and alignment with state regulations. density where possible. Regulations Reduce number of temporary licenses and regulate Industrial Economy the waterfront for uses that serve the needs of the Maintain the Chelsea Creek as a resource for water local economy; the public’s enjoyment of the dependent and other appropriate industrial uses that waterfront; ongoing operations; and economic support the tax base and regional economy. health of a working port. City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 13 III. Overall Themes and Community Vision • Build upon the area’s considerable history as a driver of the local and regional economy • Address the need to reclaim strategic locations for recreational and cultural uses by residents in nearby neighborhoods 1. Enhance public access 2. Increase density of living-wage jobs for Chelsea residents 3. Preserve the industrial and commercial character of the waterfront and adjacent upland area 4. Encourage water-dependent industrial uses and opportunities that contribute to the local tax base Municipal Harbor Plan public meeting in PORT Park City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 14 IV. Policy Areas 1. Public Access 2. Public Programming 3. Economic Development 4. City Zoning 5. Transportation 6. Infrastructure Improvements Public Access, Programming, 7. Climate Change and Streetscape Improvements Point Access 8. Pollution Linear Access Transitional Areas Long-term Industrial Uses Light-industrial / Commercial Buffer Future Development City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 15 IV. Policy Areas 1. Public Access 2. Public Programming 3. Economic Development 4. City Zoning Ordinance 5. Transportation 6. Infrastructure Improvements 7. Climate Change 8. Pollution City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek Municipal Harbor Plan Public Meeting 3 November 28th, 2018 utiledesign.com 16 Public Access: Location What features and activities would make these points of public access attractive to you? Better seating, Water-related Public Seasonal lighting, signage activities art activities Takeaways: • Strong preference for public access at Kalick Piers • Better seating and lighting along existing harbor walk • Desire for public art near the Chelsea St. bridge Feedback exercise on public features and activities for the waterfront City of Chelsea: Chelsea Creek
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chelsea Record Call Your YOUR HOMETOWN NEWSPAPERYOUR SINCE HOMETOWN 1881 NEWSPAPER SINCE 1890 Advertising Rep (781)485-0588 VOLUME 19, No
    NATIONAL NIGHT OUT HUGE SUCCESS Black Cyan Magenta Yellow Black Cyan Magenta Yellow REVERE DENTISTRY AND BRACES TOP BILLING www.ChelseaRealEstate.com General and Cosmetic Dentistry for Adults and Children email [email protected] to list your Jeff Bowen Call 781 485 0588 home, condo, or multi-family for sale with us Text/Call 370 Broadway • 781-629-9093 • Offers.RevereDentistryAndBraces.com Your Ad Here 781-201-9488 BOOK YOUR REVERE JOURNAL POST IT Chelsea record Call Your YOUR HOMETOWN NEWSPAPERYOUR SINCE HOMETOWN 1881 NEWSPAPER SINCE 1890 Advertising Rep (781)485-0588 VOLUME 19, No. 41 VOLUME 116, No. 70 THURSDAY, AUGUST 2, 2018 35 CENTS WEDNESDAY Revere's TND February 14, 2018 INDEPENDENT KEEPING COOL IN THE SQUARE School Funding Meltdown INDEX Newspaper Group receives $50,000 Editorial 4 www.chelsearecord.com Legislature fails to pass education funding fix By Seth Daniel ties who are continuously do- Police News 16 state grant for jobs ing more with less and in these Sports 11 The last second ticked off circumstances we have failed Special to The Journal the business community that the clock on Beacon Hill Tues- them. I was willing to go the Classifieds are critical to fostering eco- 18-19 day night, and when the score extra mile to make that hap- Monday morning the Bak- nomic success and building er-Polito Administration stronger neighborhoods in ev- was settled, education funding pen. To not be able to make a DEATHS awarded $500,000 to nine ery region in Massachusetts.” for Gateway cities like Chel- deal is extremely disappoint- Thomas Boyan, Sr projects through the Urban Revere is rebuilding its sea was the big loser.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Environmental Merit Awards Ceremony
    ENVIRONMENTAL MERIT AWARDS 2019 for outstanding efforts in preserving New England’s environment ceremony sept 10 environmental merit awards | 2welcome WELCOME TO THE 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL MERIT AWARDS CEREMONY DEDICATION POSTHUMOUS DOUGLAS M. COSTLE MCLEAN, VIRGINIA Douglas M. Costle was among the driving forces in the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970. After Richard M. Nixon was inaugurated in 1969, Doug was recruited to the White House Advisory Council on Executive Organization where he played a major role in conceptualizing the agency. He was appointed by Presi- dent Jimmy Carter to serve as EPA’s administrator from 1977 to 1981. At his first news conference, Doug noted that “Clean air is not an aesthetic luxury. It is a public health necessity.” Doug advanced the argument, new at the time, that environmental regulation supported eco- nomic development because it preserved resources. Doug served as dean of Vermont Law School from 1987 to 1991. He died this year at his home in McLean, Virginia. environmental merit awards | in service to states Ira W. Leighton, Jr. 1945-2013 Dedicated EPA public servant since 1972 A true friend, a mentor and a lover of New England. He will be missed. IRA LEIGHTON “IN SERVICE TO STATES” ANNUAL AWARD The New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission (NEIWPCC), the Northeast States for Coor- dinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), the Northeast Waste Management Officials’ Association (NEWMOA), in coordination with the New England state Environmen- tal Commissioners and the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1 (EPA) have initiated the Ira Leighton “In Service to States” Environmental Merit Award as a tribute to our long-time colleague and friend, Ira Leighton, who passed away in 2013, after serving forty- one years at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revolutionary War Battle America Forgot: Chelsea Creek, 27–28 May 1775
    ✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦✧✦ The Revolutionary War Battle America Forgot: Chelsea Creek, 27–28 May 1775 craig j. brown, victor t. mastone, and christopher v. maio Should I name my subject to-night “A Forgotten Battle” it would hardly be a misnomer. I speak to you to-night about an event important in the annals of New England, important in the affairs of the Revolution, and yet to all intents and purposes as forgotten as one of the many prehistoric conflicts which must have happened in and around these shores prior to 1620.Itis indeed most remarkable that an event bearing so strongly upon the affairs of the siege of Boston should have entirely passed fromnotice....Ithasbeen known in circles taking an interest in local history that there was a fight up Chelsea Creek, but what it was and where it was have well nigh passed from the minds of the present generation. —Hon. Albert D. Bossom FTER the weary soldiers of the King’s army retreated from A the bloody events at Lexington and Concord on 19 April 1775, militiamen warned from throughout New England began systematically encircling the city of Boston, placing the English garrison commanded by Governor-General Thomas Gage un- der siege. British forces in the province’s capital city had a navy stationed in Boston Harbor, but provisioning men from seaward was a tricky business. The British military had a longstanding practice of supplementing troops’ rations with fresh meat and produce that it purchased from local farmers. If these supplies Color versions of the figures in this article are available at http://www .mitpressjournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1162/TNEQ a 00295.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint WSCAC and WAC Meeting Waterworks Museum Chestnut Hill, MA February 11, 2020—10:30 A.M
    Joint WSCAC and WAC Meeting Waterworks Museum Chestnut Hill, MA February 11, 2020—10:30 A.M. WSCAC Members: Michael Baram, WSCAC Chair Bill Kiley, BWSC William Copithorne, Town of Arlington Paul Lauenstein, NepRWA Steven Daunais, Tata & Howard Janet Rothrock, League of Women Voters WAC members: Mary Adelstein Taber Keally, NepRWA Philip Ashcroft, NEWEA Karen Lachmayr, WAC Chair Wayne Chouinard, Vice Chair, Arlington DPW Belinda Stansbury (on phone) Adriana Cillo, BWSC Kannan Vembu Stephen Greene Dan Winograd James Guiod, MWRA AB Guests: Sally Carroll, MWRA Andres Ripley, NepRWA Lexi Dewey, WSCAC Meg Tabacsko, MWRA Andreae Downs, WAC Danielle DiRuzza, MWRA Teresa Keene, Burlington DPW Wendy Leo, MWRA WAC Business Andreae requested any edits to the WAC December minutes. No edits were offered, and a motion was made and seconded to approve the minutes. The minutes passed unanimously. Presentation Andreae introduced Adriana Cillo, the Educational Coordinator of Boston Water and Sewer Commission (BWSC), and Meg Tabacsko, MWRA Project Manager for School Education, and Danielle DiRuzza, School Program Administrative Coordinator, both from the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority. Adriana is a member of WAC, and is the Educational Programs Coordinator with BWSC. At the start of her presentation, she explained that she spent her first 5-6 months of the job learning about BWSC, and then developed a program that would introduce BWSC to people who were unfamiliar with it. She provides education and outreach to approximately 2,500 kids and 600-700 adults annually. Adriana shared a presentation that she uses for Boston schoolchildren. She shows images and information about the Quabbin and Wachusett Reservoirs and explains what an aqueduct is, so they learn how the water travels from the Quabbin Reservoir to their homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles in Leadership: Omenw of Color Elected to Office in Massachusetts
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Publications from the Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy Center for Women in Politics & Public Policy 5-2021 Profiles in Leadership: omenW of Color Elected to Office in Massachusetts Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy, University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umb.edu/cwppp_pubs Part of the American Politics Commons, Public Policy Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy, University of Massachusetts Boston, "Profiles in Leadership: Women of Color Elected to Office in Massachusetts" (2021). Publications from the Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy. 61. https://scholarworks.umb.edu/cwppp_pubs/61 This Research Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Women in Politics & Public Policy at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from the Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Profiles in Leadership: Women of Color Elected to Office in Massachusetts MAY 2021 MASSACHUSETTS WOMEN CENTER FOR WOMEN IN POLITICS AND PUBLIC POLICY McCORMACK GRADUATE SCHOOL OF POLICY AND GLOBAL STUDIES OF COLOR COALITION Questions regarding this publication should be sent to Center for Women in Politics & Public Policy. ABOUT THE CENTER FOR WOMEN IN POLITICS AND PUBLIC POLICY The Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy at the McCormack Graduate School works to advance women’s public leadership and the public policies that make a difference in the lives of women, particularly low-income women and women of color.
    [Show full text]
  • David R. Vallee Hydrologist-In-Charge NOAA/NWS Northeast River Forecast Center
    David R. Vallee Hydrologist-in-Charge NOAA/NWS Northeast River Forecast Center Providence Street – West Warwick, RI at 1030 am Wednesday 3/31/10 An overview of our changing climate Rainfall/Temperature trends Changes in flood & drought behavior Increasing Coastal Flood Risk The challenges before us A look at a few best practices to stem the tide of flooding DV2 Calibrate and implement a variety of hydrologic and hydraulic models to provide: River flow and stage forecasts at 180 locations Guidance on the rainfall needed to produce Flash Flooding Ensemble streamflow predictions Ice Jam and Dam Break support Water Supply forecasts Partner with NOAA Line Offices to address issues relating to Hazard Resiliency, Water Resource Services, Ecosystem Health and Management, and Climate Change Moderate flooding ‐ Connecticut River at Portland, CT. Slide 3 DV2 David Vallee, 2/19/2019 Record Flash Flooding from 5‐7 inches of rain. St‐Jean‐sur‐Richelieu, Quebec, Canada, 5/6/11 Westport, Connecticut, September 25th, 2018. Photo: AP//Canadian Press, R. Remoirz Providence Street – Warwick, RI at 1030 am Home washed off its foundation along the Wednesday 3/31/10 Schoharie Creek, Prattsville, NY – Tropical Storm I September Minimum Sea Ice Cover 2016 Arctic Sea Ice Summer Minimum 1979‐2017 This graph shows the average area covered by sea Loop of September Summer Minimum Ice Extent from ice during September each year. Minimum sea ice 1984 through 2016. Note the steady decrease in extent has decreased 12% per decade since coverage. Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • Find It and Fix It Stormwater Program in the Charles and Mystic River Watersheds
    FIND IT AND FIX IT STORMWATER PROGRAM IN THE CHARLES AND MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHEDS FINAL REPORT JUNE 2005 - AUGUST 2008 October 29, 2008 SUBMITTED TO: MASSACHUSETTS ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF GRANTS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 100 CAMBRIDGE STREET, 9TH FLOOR BOSTON, MA 02114 SUBMITTED BY: CHARLES RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION 190 PARK ROAD 20 ACADEMY STREET, SUITE 203 WESTON, MA 02493 ARLINGTON, MA 02476 Table of Contents List of Figures................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 6 Organization of Report ................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROGRAM BACKGROUND............................................................................................ 9 1.1 Charles River.................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.1 Program Study Area................................................................................................ 9 1.1.2 Water Quality Issues............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Combined Sewer Overflow Control Plan Annual Progress Report 2013
    Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Combined Sewer Overflow Control Plan Alewife Wetland, Cambridge Annual Progress Report 2013 March 2014 MWRA Board of Directors Richard K. Sullivan, Jr., Chairman John J. Carroll, Vice-Chairman Joseph C. Foti, Secretary Joel A. Barrera Kevin L. Cotter Paul E. Flanagan Andrew M. Pappastergion Brian R. Swett Henry F. Vitale John J. Walsh Jennifer L. Wolowicz Frederick A. Laskey, Executive Director Michael J. Hornbrook, Chief Operating Officer Prepared by: David A. Kubiak, P.E. Nadine S. Smoske Christopher Lam Cover: The constructed Alewife Stormwater Wetland, completed by the City of Cambridge and MWRA in April 2013, is intended to provide peak flow attenuation and wetlands treatment for the stormwater flows that will be removed from the combined sewer system by the CAM004 sewer separation project, now in construction. The wetland also provides ecological, recreational and educational benefits intended by the Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Alewife Reservation Master Plan. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. CSO CONTROL PROGRESS 1 2.1 2013 Progress Highlights and Accomplishments 1 2.2 Court Schedule Compliance and Compliance Risks 7 2.3 Ongoing Design and Construction Progress 8 Alewife Brook CSO Control Plan 8 CAM004 Stormwater Outfall and Wetland Basin 9 CAM004 Sewer Separation 14 Control Gate and Floatables Control at Outfall MWR003 and MWRA Rindge Avenue Siphon Relief 16 Reserved Channel Sewer Separation 18 2.4 Other CSO Control Improvements 21 BWSC South Dorchester Bay Inflow Removal 21 BWSC Lower Dorchester Brook Sewer Separation 21 City of Cambridge Sewer Separation Program 21 City of Chelsea Sewer Separation Program 22 City of Somerville CSO Metering Program 22 2.5 MWRA CSO Spending in 2013 22 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Provides This File for Download from Its Web Site for the Convenience of Users Only
    Disclaimer The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) provides this file for download from its Web site for the convenience of users only. Please be aware that the OFFICIAL versions of all state statutes and regulations (and many of the MassDEP policies) are only available through the State Bookstore or from the Secretary of State’s Code of Massachusetts Regulations (CMR) Subscription Service. When downloading regulations and policies from the MassDEP Web site, the copy you receive may be different from the official version for a number of reasons, including but not limited to: • The download may have gone wrong and you may have lost important information. • The document may not print well given your specific software/ hardware setup. • If you translate our documents to another word processing program, it may miss/skip/lose important information. • The file on this Web site may be out-of-date (as hard as we try to keep everything current). If you must know that the version you have is correct and up-to-date, then purchase the document through the state bookstore, the subscription service, and/or contact the appropriate MassDEP program. 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4.06: continued FIGURE LIST OF FIGURES A River Basins and Coastal Drainage Areas 1 Hudson River Basin (formerly Hoosic, Kinderhook and Bashbish River Basins) 2 Housatonic River Basin 3 Farmington River Basin 4 Westfield River Basin 5 Deerfield River Basin 6 Connecticut River Basin 7 Millers River Basin 8 Chicopee River Basin 9 Quinebaug
    [Show full text]
  • The Revolutionary War Battle of Chelsea Creek – Grounding the Historical Narrative Through Cultural Landscape Analysis
    THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR BATTLE OF CHELSEA CREEK – GROUNDING THE HISTORICAL NARRATIVE THROUGH CULTURAL LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS Victor T. Mastone Massachusetts Board of Underwater Archaeological Resources Craig J. Brown University of Edinburgh Christopher V. Maio University of Alaska, Fairbanks The Battle of Chelsea Creek (May 27–28, 1775) is often overlooked as part of the siege of Boston. Today, the area encompassing the battlefield is a heavily modified urban-industrial landscape, and the associated development activities have severely obscured the major landscape features and archeological resources associated with the battle. With funding from the National Park Service’s American Battlefield Protection Program, a geospatial and temporal assessment of the location, extent, and preservation potential of the Chelsea Creek battlefield and its associated cultural resources was undertaken. By re-examining the documentary record and using GIS analysis, a digital elevation model, and a military terrain model (KOCOA), this investigation created a high-resolution spatial and temporal dataset of Boston’s historical landscape during the time of the American Revolution. The visualization and geospatial analysis of landscapes and significant historical events greatly enhances the understanding of temporal and spatial interactions between these events and the physical landscape upon which they occurred. La bataille de Chelsea Creek (27 au 28 mai 1775) est souvent ignorée comme faisant partie du siège de Boston. Aujourd’hui, la région englobant le champ de bataille est un paysage urbain et industriel fortement altéré, et les activités d’aménagement associées ont gravement occulté les principales caractéristiques du paysage et les ressources archéologiques associées à la bataille. Grâce au financement du Programme de protection des champs de bataille américains du service des parcs nationaux, une évaluation géospatiale et temporelle du lieu, de l’étendue et du potentiel de préservation du champ de bataille de Chelsea Creek, et de ses ressources culturelles connexes a été entreprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Burial Ground of the North Parish North Andover, Massachusetts
    Second Burial Ground of the North Parish North Andover, Massachusetts A history told through headstones, family markers, town records, and the preservation efforts of many A Town Begins – and Grows European settlement in this area dates back to around 1640. General Court records of 1642 included the village of Cochichewick (by the Great Pond) in the newly formed Essex County. With the arrival of more immigrants and the founding of a church in 1645, the settlement was renamed Andover. By the 18th century, the population had grown and spread, and a call arose for a second church in the south end of town, creating a North (or First) Parish and a South Parish for the new church. This was followed by a West Parish in 1826. Eventually the town of Andover would formally spit along parish lines into the present day North Andover (North Parish) and Andover (South and West Parish). Following the English tradition, a town’s cemetery was located next to the Meetinghouse where both religious services and town meetings were held. The first burying ground still exists today on Academy Road, although the town’s first Meetinghouse has been replaced four times. The original burying ground did not officially close until 1851, however, by the early 1800s it had reached its capacity. On March 6, 1817, at a town meeting of the inhabitants of the North Parish in Andover, the men gathered to form a committee “…to See where a piece of Land may be purchased Sutabel (sic) for a burying ground.” About a month later on April 14 it was formerly voted to buy 1½ acres of land from Jonathan Stevens for a sum of $243.75.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocm17241103-1903.Pdf (4.639Mb)
    UMASS/AMHERST 315Dbb DEfi5 n4D 7 111 ii ,111 1'' 1 h ' MMiiil 5 liimuluiumii, . , IHllHl'Hiii:!!.! '1: vm» tootK-fiAii m h •1*1 or Oft.v^ii-hiAM eooptk Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Boston Library Consortium IVIember Libraries http://www.archive.org/details/annualreportofbo1903boar PUBLIC DOCUMENT No. 11, ANNUAL REPORT Board of Harbor and Land Commissioners. For the Yeae 1903 BOSTON : WRIGHT & POTTER PRINTING CO., STATE PRINTERS, 18 Post Office Square, 1904. Approved by The State Board of Publication. YflAfiBlJ Commonfoealt^ of P^assar^xtsrtts, REPORT. To the Honorable the Senate and House of Representatives of the Com- monwealth of Massachusetts. The Board of Harbor and Land Connnissioners, pursuant to the provisions of law, respectfully submits its annual re- port for the year 1903, covering a period of twelve months, from Nov. 30, 1902. From Dec. 1, 1902, to Nov. 30, 1903, the Board has held 226 meetings, has given 258 formal and informal hearings, and has received 140 petitions for license to build and main- tain structures and for privileges in tide waters, great ponds and Connecticut River, to dredge material, to remove ma- terial from beaches, and for other purposes. One hundred and twenty-one licenses for structures and privileges in tide waters, great ponds and Connecticut Eiver, have been granted during the year; also 21 permits for dredging, for the removal of material from beaches, and for other purposes. Eighty-live inspections have been made at various times by the Board, and under its direction, of work completed and in progress, also ot sites of authorized work, under ap- propriations made by the Legislature, relating to : dredging operations in Boston harbor ; improvements on the Com- monwealth's flats at South Boston ; improvements in South Bay ; the reclamation of the Province Lands in Province- town ; protective works on the Connecticut River at Hadley ; bank of Connecticut River at Hatfield ; Annisquam River in Gloucester ; Bass River in Beverly ; sea wall and jetties at 4 liARBOR AND LAND COMMISSIONERS.
    [Show full text]