DOCSLIB.ORG

Spiders of Alberta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Spiders of Alberta Like 21 Recommend this on Google Of the 39 species found in our database, the following are established in Alberta. Our current understanding of each spider's distribution is drawn from numerous scientific publications and online spider submissions in order to be as accurate as possible. It is important to remember that spiders are not bound by the territorial lines decided on by humans, therefore their distribution is subject to change. Occasionally, spiders can be found well outside of their known range due to being intentionally or accidentally transported by humans in cars, luggage, and other belongings. Species Found in Alberta Agelenopsis spp. Adult Female Adult Male (Grass Spiders) Summary “Grass Spiders” are represented by 13 species collectively found throughout most of the U.S. and southern Canada, and northern Mexico. Like all members of the funnel weaver family Agelenidae, they spin dense, non-sticky, sheet-like webs with a funnel-like retreat where the spider hides. Araneus diadematus Adult Female Adult Male (Cross Orbweaver) Summary This spider is named for the pattern of white spots on the abdomen that form a cross in most specimens. Native to Europe, it was introduced to North America long ago. It spins the classic wheel-like orb web, usually sitting head-down in the hub (center), at night as well as during the day. http://www.spiders.us/species/filter/alberta/[6/28/2014 2:22:00 PM] Spiders of Alberta Argiope trifasciata Adult Female Adult Male (Banded Garden Spider) Summary Females are large, silvery spiders with legs banded in black and yellow. Look for this species in late summer and fall in fields, prairies, gardens, and meadows. The circular webs are built close to the ground amid tall grasses and weeds, often with a zigzag band of silk running through the center. Castianeira longipalpa Adult Female Adult Male (Ant Mimic Spider) Summary This strikingly patterned species is a wandering hunter, often catching prey at night as well as during the day. They live close to the ground, under rocks and logs or in leaf litter, but are also occasionally found on (or in) buildings. Their movements are often ant-like, earning them the nickname “antmimic.” Cheiracanthium mildei Adult Female Adult Male (Longlegged Sac Spider) Summary http://www.spiders.us/species/filter/alberta/[6/28/2014 2:22:00 PM] Spiders of Alberta “Longlegged Sac Spiders” are pale green, tan, or yellow nocturnal hunting spiders with very long front legs. Native to southern Europe, this spider has made its way into North America, where it is now fairly widespread. It is commonly found indoors, where it prowls walls and ceilings at night, looking for prey or mates. Dolomedes triton Adult Female Adult Male (Six-spotted Fishing Spider) Summary A large and strong hunting spider, this species is more closely associated with water than any of the other Nearctic fishing spiders. Find it among aquatic vegetation at the margins of streams and rivers, as well as floating around in lakes and residential pools. It eats aquatic insects, small fish, or even small amphibians! Eratigena agrestis Adult Female Adult Male (Hobo Spider) Summary The “Hobo Spider” builds a funnel-shaped web on or near the ground, usually under stones and other low-lying debris. It is especially common near man-made structures here in North America, but is more of a field spider in its native Europe. Recent research has shown that it may not be a spider of medical concern as was once thought. Eratigena atrica Adult Female Adult Male (Giant House Spider) Summary The leg span of this large funnel weaver can reach 4 inches or more! Native to Europe, the “Giant House Spider” is now well- http://www.spiders.us/species/filter/alberta/[6/28/2014 2:22:00 PM] Spiders of Alberta established in the Pacific Northwest. The webs can be found in dark corners of rooms, garages, sheds, under rocks and logs, etc. May be mistaken for a Hobo Spider on occasion. Herpyllus ecclesiasticus Adult Female Adult Male (Eastern Parson Spider) Summary This a hunting spider that does not spin a web to capture prey. It gets its common name from the black and white color pattern reminiscent of the garb worn by old-time clergymen. Common east of the Rocky Mountains, it sometimes strays indoors in the course of prowling for a meal or seeking a mate. Misumena vatia Adult Female Adult Male (Goldenrod Crab Spider) Summary This spider is an ambush hunter, lying patiently in wait on flowers for an insect to come within striking range. Adult females may be overall yellow or white, with the ability to change back and forth. This species can conquer surprisingly large prey like bees and butterflies. Parasteatoda tepidariorum Adult Female Adult Male (Common House Spider) Summary This species is abundant and widespread across the entire world, and is closely associated with buildings and other man-made structures. The teardrop-shaped, papery brown egg sacs can aid in their identification. The spider’s color and body shape cause them to be mistaken for “brown widows” on occasion. Phidippus audax Adult Female Adult Male http://www.spiders.us/species/filter/alberta/[6/28/2014 2:22:00 PM] Spiders of Alberta (Bold Jumper) Summary The “Bold Jumper” is one of the largest and most common species of jumping spider in North America. The spider is mostly black with a conspicuous white, orange, or red triangular patch in the center of its abdomen. Take a close look at this spider’s chelicerae (jaws), as they have a gorgeous, iridescent sheen to them and come in a variety of colors! Pholcus phalangioides Adult Female Adult Male (Longbodied Cellar Spider) Summary The Longbodied Cellar Spider is thought to be native to Europe, but can be found globally after having traveled nearly everywhere as a stowaway in commerce. Their long, thin legs and elongated abdomen make them relatively easy to identify. Find them on ceilings, in basements, storage sheds, old wells, caves, and other dry locations with low light. Salticus scenicus Adult Female Adult Male (Zebra Jumper) Summary The zebra-like color pattern makes this species one of the easier jumping spiders to identify in the field. It is most common around urban and suburban areas where it hunts by day on fences, rock walls, the exterior of buildings, and similar situations. Thought to be native to Europe, it is also now established in the U.S., southern Canada, and Asia. Tegenaria domestica Adult Female Adult Male (Barn Funnel Weaver) Summary http://www.spiders.us/species/filter/alberta/[6/28/2014 2:22:00 PM] Spiders of Alberta Today, this species occurs nearly everywhere people live, having spread with international commerce. The sheet-like webs of this spider are conspicuous in dark corners of barns, cellars, sheds, garages, cabins, and other man-made structures. Adult males frequently get caught in bathtubs or sinks at night. http://www.spiders.us/species/filter/alberta/[6/28/2014 2:22:00 PM].
Recommended publications
  • Threat Defense: Cyber Deception Approach and Education for Resilience in Hybrid Threats Model

    Threat Defense: Cyber Deception Approach and Education for Resilience in Hybrid Threats Model

    S S symmetry Article Threat Defense: Cyber Deception Approach and Education for Resilience in Hybrid Threats Model William Steingartner 1,* , Darko Galinec 2 and Andrija Kozina 3 1 Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 042 00 Košice, Slovakia 2 Department of Informatics and Computing, Zagreb University of Applied Sciences, Vrbik 8, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] 3 Dr. Franjo Tudman¯ Croatian Defence Academy, 256b Ilica Street, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This paper aims to explore the cyber-deception-based approach and to design a novel conceptual model of hybrid threats that includes deception methods. Security programs primarily focus on prevention-based strategies aimed at stopping attackers from getting into the network. These programs attempt to use hardened perimeters and endpoint defenses by recognizing and blocking malicious activities to detect and stop attackers before they can get in. Most organizations implement such a strategy by fortifying their networks with defense-in-depth through layered prevention controls. Detection controls are usually placed to augment prevention at the perimeter, and not as consistently deployed for in-network threat detection. This architecture leaves detection gaps that are difficult to fill with existing security controls not specifically designed for that role. Rather than using prevention alone, a strategy that attackers have consistently succeeded against, defenders Citation: Steingartner, W.; are adopting a more balanced strategy that includes detection and response. Most organizations Galinec, D.; Kozina, A. Threat Defense: Cyber Deception Approach deploy an intrusion detection system (IDS) or next-generation firewall that picks up known attacks and Education for Resilience in or attempts to pattern match for identification.
  • 2018 Deer Hunting Regulations

    2018 Deer Hunting Regulations

    2018 WISCONSIN Deer Hunting Regulations Photo by Brad Holtz Katie Hettel harvested this buck while hunting with family and friends in Florence County. Katie has been deer hunting for 14 years and this is her second buck. This 9-pointer was observed on trail cameras around the property a week prior to the season, and on opening morning of the 9-day gun deer season, Katie harvested it with a clean shot at 40 yards. Congratulations, Katie! WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES PUB-WM-431 2018 This pamphlet gives you a summary of Wisconsin’s important deer hunting laws and how they affect you; it is not a complete set of all the hunting- related laws. Wisconsin Deer Hunting Basics This guide outlines the basics of what you need to know to hunt deer in Wisconsin in 2018. 1. What’s New in 2018 4. Carry proof of your deer harvest authorizations ► Several deer management zone and metro sub-unit boundaries have changed. See You are not required to validate or attach a paper harvest authorization pages 24 - 27. (formerly known as “deer carcass tag”) to the deer, but you must still carry ► Several DMUs will offer an extended, any-deer archery season through Jan. 31, 2019. See page 10. proof of your harvest authorization. Three main deer harvest authorization ► Deer tags are now referred to as “harvest authorizations.” Hunters must still carry proof types are offered, but you may be eligible for one or more of the other of a hunting license and deer harvest authorizations while afield. antlerless harvest authorization types listed on pages 14 - 16.
  • Untangling the Web… Spiders in Arizona Fields! Ayman Mostafa, Lydia M

    Untangling the Web… Spiders in Arizona Fields! Ayman Mostafa, Lydia M

    Untangling the Web… Spiders in Arizona Fields! Ayman Mostafa, Lydia M. Brown, Tim Vandervoet, Peter C. Ellsworth (University of Arizona), Vonny Barlow (University of California) & Steven E. Naranjo (USDA-ARS, ALARC) Spiders are beneficial inhabitants of agricultural fields because of Lygus nymph prey their important contributions to biological control of pest insects, consuming tons of small arthropods every year. Spiders eat anything they can catch, even prey larger than themselves. When they are abundant, they contribute to the control of many insect pests in A Arizona crop fields including whiteflies, Lygus bugs, fleahoppers, Leafhopper and lepidopteran larvae. Field studies in Arizona demonstrate that the prey B crab spider, Misumenops celer (Family Thomisidae, Fig. 1A, B) and Dictyna spider, Dictyna reticulata (Family Dictynidae, Fig. 1C, D) are common in Arizona cotton fields and can be influential predators. Unlike other spiders that spin webs to capture their food, crab spiders rely on stealth and surprise. They actively search plant surfaces, litter, and debris for prey. They hide in flowers or foliage and ambush their prey. Their common name derives from the fact that they look like and walk like crabs. Dictyna are small, brownish, web-making E spiders that trap whitefly adults and other insects in their webs (Fig. 1C). Examining their webs enables easy identification of what D species of whitefly are in the field (sweetpotato or banded-winged). C Jumping spiders (Family Salticidae, Fig. 1E) are generally less abundant in cotton fields but, like crab spiders, ambush their prey. They have stout bodies and long front legs adapted for jumping, as well as four pairs of eyes with one very large set in the middle of their face.
  • Prey of the Jumping Spider Phidippus Johnsoni (Araneae : Salticidae)

    Prey of the Jumping Spider Phidippus Johnsoni (Araneae : Salticidae)

    Jackson, R. R . 1977 . Prey of the jumping spider Phidippus johnsoni (Araneae : Salticidae) . J. Arachnol. 5 :145-149 . PREY OF THE JUMPING SPIDER PHIDIPPUS JOHNSONI (ARANEAE : SALTICIDAE) Robert R. Jackson I Zoology Departmen t University of Californi a Berkeley, California 9472 0 ABSTRACT Field data indicate that P. johnsoni is an euryphagous predator, whose diet includes organisms (aphids, ants, opilionids) sometimes considered distasteful to spiders . Other spiders are preyed upon , including conspecifics. Prey size tends to be one quarter to three quarters the size of the predator . INTRODUCTION Since spiders are probably a dominant group of predators of insects (Bristowe, 1941 ; Riechert, 1974; Turnbull, 1973), there is considerable interest in their feeding ecology . Spiders have usually been considered to be euryphagous predators with a stabilizing , rather than regulative, effect on insect populations (Riechert, 1974) . However, informa- tion concerning the prey taken by particular spider species, in the field, is limited . Field studies by Edgar (1969, 1970), Robinson and Robinson (1970) and Turnbull (1960) are especially noteworthy . During the course of a study of the reproductive biology of Phidippus johnsoni (Peckham and Peckham) (Jackson, 1976), occasionally individuals of this species were found in the field holding prey in their chelicerae . Each prey discovered in this way i s listed in Table 1 . In addition, Ken Evans and Charles Griswold, who were familiar wit h this species, recorded observations of P. johnsoni with prey. (Their data are included in Table 1 .) These data came from a variety of habitats in western North America, most o f which have been described elsewhere (Jackson, 1976) .
  • Spiders of the Hawaiian Islands: Catalog and Bibliography1

    Spiders of the Hawaiian Islands: Catalog and Bibliography1

    Pacific Insects 6 (4) : 665-687 December 30, 1964 SPIDERS OF THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS: CATALOG AND BIBLIOGRAPHY1 By Theodore W. Suman BISHOP MUSEUM, HONOLULU, HAWAII Abstract: This paper contains a systematic list of species, and the literature references, of the spiders occurring in the Hawaiian Islands. The species total 149 of which 17 are record­ ed here for the first time. This paper lists the records and literature of the spiders in the Hawaiian Islands. The islands included are Kure, Midway, Laysan, French Frigate Shoal, Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, Lanai, Maui and Hawaii. The only major work dealing with the spiders in the Hawaiian Is. was published 60 years ago in " Fauna Hawaiiensis " by Simon (1900 & 1904). All of the endemic spiders known today, except Pseudanapis aloha Forster, are described in that work which also in­ cludes a listing of several introduced species. The spider collection available to Simon re­ presented only a small part of the entire Hawaiian fauna. In all probability, the endemic species are only partly known. Since the appearance of Simon's work, there have been many new records and lists of introduced spiders. The known Hawaiian spider fauna now totals 149 species and 4 subspecies belonging to 21 families and 66 genera. Of this total, 82 species (5596) are believed to be endemic and belong to 10 families and 27 genera including 7 endemic genera. The introduced spe­ cies total 65 (44^). Two unidentified species placed in indigenous genera comprise the remaining \%. Seventeen species are recorded here for the first time. In the catalog section of this paper, families, genera and species are listed alphabetical­ ly for convenience.
  • Key to Common Indoor Spiders Found in Utah

    Key to Common Indoor Spiders Found in Utah

    KEY TO COMMON INDOOR SPIDERS FOUND IN UTAH Alan H. Roe Insect Diagnostician Utah Plant Pest Diagnostic Lab November 2005 This key is intended as an identification aid for spider specimens commonly collected from indoor situations in Utah. It is not all-inclusive and will not correctly identify all spiders. However, the key does include groups that comprise about 90% of the specimens that are submitted from household situations in Utah, and about 80% of spiders submitted from all situations. This simplified key is designed for use by persons with a minimal knowledge of spider anatomy. Anatomical characteristics utilized by the key include eye arrangements, the number of claws on the tarsi, the presence or lack of claw tufts, the appearance of the spinnerets, and the arrangement of teeth (if any) on the rear margin of the cheliceral fang furrow. Actual photographs of spider anatomy are utilized to illustrate the various characteristics described in the key. A dissecting microscope (20X minimum power) is recommended to observe the necessary characteristics. One or two pairs of fine forceps and a dissecting pin are useful for manipulating specimens. A silicone-filled dissecting dish and insect pins may also be useful for holding specimens in the required viewing positions. Ethyl alcohol (70%) is recommended for preserving spider specimens. Specimens can be viewed submerged under alcohol or dry, but dry specimens are prone to breakage. Spiders included in this key are identified to the family, genus, or species level. A list of these spiders and their classification level is given in the table below. The actual key follows the table.
  • HOUSEHOLD ARTHROPODS Nuisance Household Jean R

    HOUSEHOLD ARTHROPODS Nuisance Household Jean R

    2015 Household Pests 2/22/2015 OVERVIEW Guidelines & Principles Groups of pests Public health pests HOUSEHOLD ARTHROPODS Nuisance Household Jean R. Natter Structural pests 2015 2 MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES DETERMINE MANAGEMENT Define the problem Eradicate? Damage? Critter(s)? Control? ID the critter Manage? Pest? Tolerate? Dangerous? (people, pets, or structures?) Did it just stumble indoors? Verify: PNW Insect Management Handbook Appropriate management 3 4 CAPTURE THE CRITTER RECOMMENDATIONS Research-based management EPA says: Pest control materials must be labeled for that purpose * * * * * * * * * * (Common Sense Pest Control) No home remedies 5 6 Jean R. Natter 2015 Household Pests 1 2015 Household Pests 2/22/2015 PUBLIC HEALTH: BED BUGS 3/16” Broadly flat, oval Cracks, crevices, & PUBLIC HEALTH PESTS seams (naturephoto.cz.com) Eggs glued in place Blood feeders (Bed Bugs; WSU; FS070E) Bites w/o pain Odor: sweet; acrid Bed Bugs (FS070E) 7 (J. R. Natter) 8 MANAGEMENT: BED BUGS PUBLIC HEALTH: MOSQUITOES Key Points Mattress: Encase or heat Rx Launder bedding, clothes – hot! Pest control company (NY Times) (L & R: University of Missouri; gambusia Stamford University) 9 10 MANAGEMENT: MOSQUITOES PUBLIC HEALTH: FLEAS Key Points Adults on animal Eggs drop off Source reduction Larvae ½” Personal protection w/tan head Mosquito fish (Gambusia), if legal Larvae eat debris Rx for larvae: Bti Pupa “waits” (Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis) Nest parasites (University of Illinois) 11 12 Jean R. Natter 2015 Household Pests 2 2015 Household Pests 2/22/2015 MANAGEMENT: FLEAS PUBLIC HEALTH: TICKS Rocky Mountain wood tick Key Points 3-step program Dermacentor species 1. Vacuum often East of Cascades 2. Insect growth regulator (IGR) Immatures feed mostly on carpet & pet’s “nest” on rodents 3.
  • A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)

    A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)

    Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views.
  • Araneae, Theridiidae)

    Araneae, Theridiidae)

    Phelsuma 14; 49-89 Theridiid or cobweb spiders of the granitic Seychelles islands (Araneae, Theridiidae) MICHAEL I. SAARISTO Zoological Museum, Centre for Biodiversity University of Turku,FIN-20014 Turku FINLAND [micsaa@utu.fi ] Abstract. - This paper describes 8 new genera, namely Argyrodella (type species Argyrodes pusillus Saaristo, 1978), Bardala (type species Achearanea labarda Roberts, 1982), Nanume (type species Theridion naneum Roberts, 1983), Robertia (type species Theridion braueri (Simon, 1898), Selimus (type species Theridion placens Blackwall, 1877), Sesato (type species Sesato setosa n. sp.), Spinembolia (type species Theridion clabnum Roberts, 1978), and Stoda (type species Theridion libudum Roberts, 1978) and one new species (Sesato setosa n. sp.). The following new combinations are also presented: Phycosoma spundana (Roberts, 1978) n. comb., Argyrodella pusillus (Saaristo, 1978) n. comb., Rhomphaea recurvatus (Saaristo, 1978) n. comb., Rhomphaea barycephalus (Roberts, 1983) n. comb., Bardala labarda (Roberts, 1982) n. comb., Moneta coercervus (Roberts, 1978) n. comb., Nanume naneum (Roberts, 1983) n. comb., Parasteatoda mundula (L. Koch, 1872) n. comb., Robertia braueri (Simon, 1898). n. comb., Selimus placens (Blackwall, 1877) n. comb., Sesato setosa n. gen, n. sp., Spinembolia clabnum (Roberts, 1978) n. comb., and Stoda libudum (Roberts, 1978) n. comb.. Also the opposite sex of four species are described for the fi rst time, namely females of Phycosoma spundana (Roberts, 1978) and P. menustya (Roberts, 1983) and males of Spinembolia clabnum (Roberts, 1978) and Stoda libudum (Roberts, 1978). Finally the morphology and terminology of the male and female secondary genital organs are discussed. Key words. - copulatory organs, morphology, Seychelles, spiders, Theridiidae. INTRODUCTION Theridiids or comb-footed spiders are very variable in general apperance often with considerable sexual dimorphism.
  • Checklist of Non-Insect Invertebrates of Steele Creek Park

    Checklist of Non-Insect Invertebrates of Steele Creek Park

    Checklist of Non-Insect Invertebrates of Steele Creek Park Harvestmen (Order Opiliones) __ Leiobunum aldrichi __ Leiobunum vittatum (Eastern Harvestman) __ Odiellus nubivagus __ Odiellus pictus __ Vonones sayi (Ornate Harvestman) Centipedes (Class Chilopoda) __ Geophilus vittatus (Diamondback Soil Centipede) __ Hemiscolopendra marginata (Florida Blue Centipede, Eastern Bark Centipede) __ Scolopocryptops nigridius __ Scolopocryptops sexspinosus (Eastern Fire Centipede) __ Strigamia bothriopus __ Theatops posticus (Smooth-tailed Forceps Centipede) __ Cryptops leucopodus Millipedes (Class Diplopoda) __ Apheloria montana (Cherry Millipede) __ Brachycybe lecontii (Feather Millipede) __ Cambala annulata __ Oxidus gracilis (Greenhouse Millipede)* __ Pseudopolydesmus canadensis __ Abacion magnum __ Abacion tesselatum __ Euryurus leachii __ Andrognathus corticarius (Cope’s Noodle Millipede) __ Narceus americanus-annularis (American Giant Millipede) Spiders (Order Araneae) __ Agelenopsis sp. (Grass Spider) __ Araneus marmoreus (Marbled Orbweaver) __ Araniella displicata (Six-spotted Orbweaver) __ Dolomedes albineus (White-striped Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes tenebrosus (Dark Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes triton (Six-spotted Fishing Spider) __ Dolomedes vittatus (Banded Fishing Spider) __ Larinioides cornutus (Furrow Orbweaver) __ Leucage venusta (Orchard Orbweaver) __ Micrathena gracilis (Spiny Micrathena) __ Micrathena mitrata (White Micrathena) __ Micrathena sagitatta (Arrow-shaped Micrathena) __ Misumenoides formosipes (White-banded Crab Spider) __ Neoscona crucifera (Spotted Orbweaver) __ Phidippus audax (Bold Jumping Spider) __ Phidippus otiosus (Canopy Jumping Spider) __ Phidippus putnami (Putnam’s Jumping Spider) __ Platycryptus undatus (Tan Jumping Spider) __ Pardosa sp. (Thin-legged Wolf Spider) __ Pirata sp. (Pirate Wolf Spider) __ Rabidosa rabida (Rabid Wolf Spider) __ Schizocosa crassipes (Brush-footed Wolf Spider) __ Synema parvulum (Black-banded Crab Spider) __ Tetragnatha sp.

  • The Study of Hidden Habitats Sheds Light on Poorly Known Taxa: Spiders of the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 841: 39–59 (2019)The study of hidden habitats sheds light on poorly known taxa... 39 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.841.33271 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The study of hidden habitats sheds light on poorly known taxa: spiders of the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum Enrique Ledesma1, Alberto Jiménez-Valverde1, Alberto de Castro2, Pablo Aguado-Aranda1, Vicente M. Ortuño1 1 Research Team on Soil Biology and Subterranean Ecosystems, Department of Life Science, Faculty of Science, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain 2 Entomology Department, Aranzadi Science Society, Donostia - San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain Corresponding author: Enrique Ledesma ([email protected]); Alberto Jiménez-Valverde ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Michalik | Received 22 January 2019 | Accepted 5 March 2019 | Published 23 April 2019 http://zoobank.org/52EA570E-CA40-453D-A921-7785A9BD188B Citation: Ledesma E, Jiménez-Valverde A, de Castro A, Aguado-Aranda P, Ortuño VM (2019) The study of hidden habitats sheds light on poorly known taxa: spiders of the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum. ZooKeys 841: 39–59. https:// doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.841.33271 Abstract The scarce and biased knowledge about the diversity and distribution of Araneae species in the Iberian Peninsula is accentuated in poorly known habitats such as the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum (MSS). The aim of this study was to characterize the spiders inventory of the colluvial MSS of the Sierra de Guadar- rama National Park, and to assess the importance of this habitat for the conservation of the taxon. Thirty-three localities were selected across the high peaks of the Guadarrama mountain range and they were sampled for a year using subterranean traps specially designed to capture arthropods in the MSS.
  • Spider Biology Unit

    Spider Biology Unit

    Spider Biology Unit RET I 2000 and RET II 2002 Sally Horak Cortland Junior Senior High School Grade 7 Science Support for Cornell Center for Materials Research is provided through NSF Grant DMR-0079992 Copyright 2004 CCMR Educational Programs. All rights reserved. Spider Biology Unit Overview Grade level- 7th grade life science- heterogeneous classes Theme- The theme of this unit is to understand the connection between form and function in living things and to investigate what humans can learn from other living things. Schedule- projected time for this unit is 3 weeks Outline- *Activity- Unique spider facts *PowerPoint presentation giving a general overview of the biology of spiders with specific examples of interest *Lab- Spider observations *Cross-discipline activity #1- Spider short story *Activity- Web Spiders and Wandering spiders *Project- create a 3-D model of a spider that is anatomically correct *Project- research a specific spider and create a mini-book of information. *Activity- Spider defense pantomime *PowerPoint presentation on Spider Silk *Lab- Fiber Strength and Elasticity *Lab- Polymer Lab *Project- Spider silk challenge Support for Cornell Center for Materials Research is provided through NSF Grant DMR-0079992 Copyright 2004 CCMR Educational Programs. All rights reserved. Correlation to the NYS Intermediate Level Science Standards (Core Curriculum, Grades 5-8): General Skills- #1. Follow safety procedures in the classroom and laboratory. #2. Safely and accurately use the following measurement tools- Metric ruler, triple beam balance #3. Use appropriate units for measured or calculated values #4. Recognize and analyze patterns and trends #5. Classify objects according to an established scheme and a student-generated scheme.