DOCSLIB.ORG

A Countercultural Movement: Examining Carolee Schneemann’S Kinetic Theatre Between 1963 and 1970

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Countercultural Movement: Examining Carolee Schneemann’S Kinetic Theatre Between 1963 and 1970 A Countercultural Movement: Examining Carolee Schneemann’s Kinetic Theatre Between 1963 and 1970 Sylvie Laura Simonds Department of Art History and Communcation Studies McGill University, Montreal April 2013 A thesis submitted to McGill University in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Sylvie Laura Simonds 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ......................................................................................................iii List of Illustrations ....................................................................................................iii Résumé ......................................................................................................................iii Abstract......................................................................................................................v Acknowledgments......................................................................................................vi Introduction..............................................................................................................1 Examining the Counterculture .......................................................................4 Historicizing Kinetic Theatre.........................................................................11 Farewell to the 60s and Kinetic Theatre ........................................................15 Literature Review on Schneemann ................................................................18 Overview........................................................................................................23 Chapter 1: A window for Stan Brakhage...............................................................28 A window of opportunity...............................................................................37 Examining the use of the Muse .....................................................................45 Allegorical Value: Examining nature, the muse and the body in Dog Star Man and Eye/Body.....................................................................52 Re-thinking the use of the muse in Eye/Body ...............................................60 A Portrait for Brakhage: painting as an expanded medium ...........................67 Conclusion: “From Schneemann” a riddle unsolved.....................................73 Chapter 2: Cold War Psychiatry and the Recovery of Sensation in Carolee Schneemann’s kinetic theatre...................................................................77 Schneemann’s Paranoid Aesthetics................................................................85 A Laboratory for the Senses...........................................................................91 Wake me up If I’m still dreaming... ...............................................................101 Seeing the 1960s Hypnagogically..................................................................107 It's all in the mind! .........................................................................................110 Sensory Expansion.........................................................................................119 Conclusion .....................................................................................................124 Chapter 3: More than Free Love: reconsidering the role of antipsychiatry in Carolee Schneemann’s kinetic theatre...............................................................127 R. D. Laing and the Politics of Experience....................................................136 Meat Joy and the Politics of the Self .............................................................140 More than Free Love: Reconsidering Meat, Eros, and Madness in Meat Joy.........................................................................................................149 i Performing the Revolution: Utopian Dreams in Paradise Now.....................153 Conclusion .....................................................................................................160 Chapter 4: Reading between the lines: examining sexism and violence in the Dialectics of Liberation............................................................................................162 Inclusion and Exclusion.................................................................................166 It might not be obvious: addressing the invisibility of violence and conflict in the New Left .................................................................................178 The rise of militancy in the New Left............................................................189 Conclusion .....................................................................................................199 Bibliography ..............................................................................................................201 ii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1: Carolee Schneemann, Eye Body: 36 Transformative Actions, 1962-1963, photographic still, taken by Erró ............................................................ Figure 2: Carolee Schneemann, Eye Body: 36 Transformative Actions, 1962-1963, Detail of Schneemann with two snakes.................................................. Figure 3: Carolee Schneemann, Eye Body: 36 Transformative Actions, 1962-1963, Inside Colorado House, photographic still, taken by Erró..................... Figure 4: Frans Holbein, The Ambassadors, 1533. Oil on canvas. National Gallery, London. ...................................................................................................................... Figure 5: Beer, Jack. Jack Ruby shoots Lee Harvey Oswald, November 24, 1963.................................................................................................... Figure 6: Stan Brakhage, Dog Star Man, 1962-1964, 16mm, black & white, color, silent, 78 min......................................................................................... Figure 7: Carolee Schneemann, Windows to Brakhage, 1962-1963 ......................... Figure 8: Stan Brakhage, Dog Star Man, film still ................................................... Figure 9: Stan Brakhage, Dog Star Man, film still ................................................... Figure 10: Stan Brakhage, Dog Star Man, film still ................................................. Figure 11: Stan Brakhage, Dog Star Man, film still ................................................. Figure 12: Stan Brakhage, Dog Star Man, film still.................................................. Figure 13: Stan Brakhage, Dog Star Man, film still.................................................. Figure 14: Carolee Schneemann, Eye Body: 36 Transformative Actions, 1962-1963, Image with Ying and Yang, photographic still, taken by Erró................ Figure 15: Carolee Schneemann, Eye/Body 36 Transformative Actions, 1962-1963 .................................................................................................................. Figure 16: Carolee Schneemann, Eye Body: 36 Transformative Actions, 1962-1963, Image with mink furs, photographic still taken by Erró......................... iii Figure 17: Carolee Schneemann, Fur Wheel, 1962, construction on lamp shade base: fur, tin cans, mirrors, glass, oil paint, mounted on turning wheel, (19x19x11.5”)................................................................................................. Figure 18: Stan Brakhage, Dog Star Man, detail from part II .................................. Figure 19: Carolee Schneemann, Eye/Body detail with Ice Box, 1962 (27x40x18”) Figure 20: Life Magazine, January 25, 1963, cover .................................................. Figure 21: Carolee Schneemann, Viet Flakes, 1965-66 ............................................ Figure 22: Carolee Schneemann, Viet Flakes, 1965-66............................................. Figure 23: Carolee Schneemann, Snows, 1967.......................................................... Figure 24: Carolee Schneemann, Snows, 1967.......................................................... Figure 25: Carolee Schneemann, Snows, 1967.......................................................... Figure 26:Carolee Schneemann, Snows, 1967........................................................... Figure 28: Stan Brakhage, 23rd Psalm Branch, 1966-78.......................................... Figure 29: Stan Brakhage, 23rd Psalm Branch, 1966-78 ......................................... Figure 30: Stan Brakhage, 23rd Psalm Branch, 1966-78 ......................................... Figure 31: Stan Brakhage, 23rd Psalm Branch, 1966-78 ......................................... Figure 32: Dr. Donald O. Hebb’s experiment constructed at McGill University in Montreal, to study the effects of prolonged sensory deprivation. ............................. Figure 33: Carolee Schneemann, Illinois Central, 1968 ........................................... Figure 34: Carolee Schneemann, Illinois Central, 1968............................................ Figure 35: Carolee Schneemann, Illinois Central, 1968 ........................................... Figure 36: Carolee Schneemann, Meat Joy, 1964 .................................................... Figure 37: Carolee Schneemann, Meat Joy, 1964 .................................................... Figure 38: Carolee Schneemann, Meat Joy, 1964 .................................................... iv Figure 39: Living Theatre, Paradise Now, 1968 ...................................................... Figure 40: Living Theatre, Paradise Now, 1968
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stan Brakhage
    DAVID E. JAMES Introduction Stan Brakhage The Activity of His Nature Milton produced Paradise Lost for the same reason that a silk worm produces silk. It was an activity of his nature.—KARL MARX ork on this collection of texts began some three years ago, when we hoped to publish it in 2003 to celebrate Stan Brakhage’s Wseventieth birthday. Instead, belatedly, it mourns his death. The baby who would become James Stanley Brakhage was born on 14 January 1933 in an orphanage in Kansas City, Missouri.1 He was adopted and named by a young couple, Ludwig, a college teacher of business, and his wife, Clara, who had herself been raised by a stepmother. The family moved from town to town in the Middle West and, sensitive to the stresses of his parents’ unhappy marriage, Stanley was a sickly child, asthmatic and over- weight. His mother took a lover, eventually leaving her husband, who sub- sequently came to terms with his homosexuality and also himself took a lover. In 1941, mother and son found themselves alone in Denver. Put in a boys’ home, the child picked up the habits of a petty criminal, but before his delinquency became serious, he was placed with a stable, middle-class family in which he began to discover his gifts. He excelled in writing and dramatics and in singing, becoming one of the leading voices in the choir of the Cathedral of St. John’s in Denver. Retrieving her now-teenaged son, his mother tried to make a musician of him, but Stanley resisted his tutors, even attempting to strangle his voice teacher.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluxus Feminus
    FluxusFeminus KathyO'Dell There's no denyingit: Fluxus was an inclusiveoperation. The 1993 retro- spectiveexhibition "In the Spiritof Fluxus,"brilliantly organized by Elizabeth Armstrongand JoanRothfuss of the WalkerArt Center, confirmed that there were probablymore women and artistsof color associatedwith Fluxus than with any otherprevious grouping of artistsin Westernart history. This is no insignificantfact, given the originsof Fluxusin the earlyI960s in the wake of the seeminglymonolithic, white, male-dominatedphenomenon of Abstract Expressionism.Charlotte Moorman, Nam June Paik, Alison Knowles, Ben- jamin Patterson,Carolee Schneemann,Kate Millett, Shigeko Kubota, and Yako Ono are onlya few of the artistswho at one timeor anotherwere asso- ciatedwith Fluxus and were representedin the exhibition. Inclusivityis a relativeterm, however, and when it comesto figuringFluxus into the discourseon, say, genderissues, the titleof thisexhibition should be takenvery seriously. For it was, indeed, "in the spiritof Fluxus" thatits prac- tices be inclusive.But the historicalreality was somewhatdifferent-a history impossibleto documentin exhibitionformat due to the amorphousnature of its underpinnings.It is thishistory I wish to explorehere, in an effortto ex- pose those underpinningsand the affectthey had on work by women associ- ated withthe artisticactivities that came to be knownas "Fluxus."' As is well-documentedin numeroustexts, one of the mostrecent being the substantivecatalog that accompanied the exhibition (see Armstrongand Rothfuss 1993), it was Lithuanian architectand graphic designer George Maciunas who in 1962 bestowed the name "Fluxus" on an arrayof interna- tionalartists who shareda particularsensibility from which theywould work for many years, up to and including the present moment. For the same amount of time,this shared sensibility has defiedfirm definition-a predict- able and no doubt intentionaloutcome of Maciunas's neologizinga name for the groupfrom a rootword signifyingconstant change and transition.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 3, Spring 2001
    The University of Iowa School of ArtNEWSLETTER &History Volume 3 Spring/Summer 2001 Art Greetings Warm greetings from the School of Art and Adams, who taught contemporary African Art History! After one of the coldest and art with us this spring will be joining us from harshest winters on record here we as an assistant professor of art history this enjoyed a magnificent spring (although we fall. Over the next few weeks we expect Dorothy are all keeping an eye on the river which to add a faculty member in graphic design is getting higher every day). As the and several visitors in art and art history Johnson, spring semester draws to a close we are for the next academic year. looking forward to the M.F.A. show in the Director Museum of Art and are still enjoying the Growth & Development faculty show at the Museum which is one The School continues to grow every year. of the largest and most diverse we have The numbers of our faculty members seen. This year, thanks to the generosity increase as we try to keep up with ever- of the College, the Vice President for growing enrollments at the undergraduate Research and the University Foundation, and graduate levels. This year we have we are going to have a catalogue of the well over 700 undergraduate majors and faculty exhibit in full color. over 200 graduate students. In addition, we serve thousands of non-majors, espe- Farewells cially in our General Education classes in This is also the time of year for farewells.
    [Show full text]
  • Ana Mendieta and Carolee Schneemann Selected Works 1966 – 1983
    Irrigation Veins: Ana Mendieta and Carolee Schneemann Selected Works 1966 – 1983 On view April 30 – May 30, 2020 Ana Mendieta. Volcán, 1979, color photograph Carolee Schneemann, Study for Up to and Including Her Limits, 1973, color © The Estate of Ana Mendieta Collection, LLC photograph, photo credit: Antony McCall Courtesy Galerie Lelong & Co., New York Courtesy of the Estate of Carolee Schneemann, Galerie Lelong & Co., and Licensed by Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York P·P·O·W, New York “These obsessive acts of re-asserting my ties with the earth are really a manifestation of my thirst for being.” Ana Mendieta Galerie Lelong & Co. and P·P·O·W present Irrigation Veins: Ana Mendieta and Carolee Schneemann, Selected Works 1966 – 1983, an online exhibition exploring the artists’ parallel histories, iconographies, and shared affinities for ancient forms and the natural world. Galerie Lelong and P·P·O·W have a history of collaboration and have co-represented Carolee Schneemann since 2017. This will be the first time the two artists are shown together in direct dialogue, an exhibition Schneemann proposed during the last year of her life. In works such as Mendieta’s Volcán (1979) and Schneemann’s Study for Up To and Including Her Limits (1973), both artists harnessed physical action to root themselves into the earth, establishing their ties to the earth and asserting bodily agency in the face of societal restraints and repression. Both artists identified as painters prior to activating their bodies as material; Mendieta received a MA in painting from the University of Iowa in 1972, and Schneemann received an MFA from the University of Illinois in 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Times of Penny Arcade. Matthew Hes Ridan Ames Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1996 "I Am Contemporary!": The Life and Times of Penny Arcade. Matthew heS ridan Ames Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Ames, Matthew Sheridan, ""I Am Contemporary!": The Life and Times of Penny Arcade." (1996). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6150. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6150 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonya Lockyer METAPHYSICAL CHOREOGRAPHY in NORTH
    Tonya Lockyer 0740114 May 22, 2007 METAPHYSICAL CHOREOGRAPHY IN NORTH AMERICA 1984 to 1996 From 1984-1996, American choreographers Paula Josa-Jones and Marie Chouinard were in many ways very representative of their times. They produced a global vision born out of cross- pollination and international inspiration. They shared many values with the neo-expressionism of European Tanztheatre and Japanese Butoh. And they shared philosophical and aesthetic concerns with American feminist performance art, which reached its nader in the 80ʼs. Yet when their intuitive, expressive work intersected with the dominant, conservative, post-modern formalism of American modern dance, it resulted in their work being radicalized and marginalized to the “fringes.” They did not fit into the dominant critical view of what defined American modern dance. Despite the critical acclaim their work received, and the prominent venues that presented their work, they are often omitted from dance history surveys of this period or given only small mention. The dances that we choose to remember in our historical canons say much about our national and communal identities. Yet it is often a select, powerful few who determine the relevance of a work of art, or who are privileged with interpretation of social significance. The 80ʼs are rightly remembered as a time of materialism, ambition, gender bending, and anxiety. Many American choreographers who embraced virtuosity, spectacle and/or the politics of the body in their work reflected these social concerns. Yet I hope to bring to light how certain dance historical cliché do not reflect the diversity of artistic responses during this time period.
    [Show full text]
  • Online, Issue 15 and 16 July/Sept 2001 and July 2002
    n.paradoxa online, issue 15 and 16 July/Sept 2001 and July 2002 Editor: Katy Deepwell n.paradoxa online issue no.15 and 16 July/Sept 2001 and July 2002 ISSN: 1462-0426 1 Published in English as an online edition by KT press, www.ktpress.co.uk, as issues 15 and 16, n.paradoxa: international feminist art journal http://www.ktpress.co.uk/pdf/nparadoxaissue15and16.pdf July 2001 and July/Sept 2002, republished in this form: January 2010 ISSN: 1462-0426 All articles are copyright to the author All reproduction & distribution rights reserved to n.paradoxa and KT press. No part of this publication may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, including photocopying and recording, information storage or retrieval, without permission in writing from the editor of n.paradoxa. Views expressed in the online journal are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of the editor or publishers. Editor: [email protected] International Editorial Board: Hilary Robinson, Renee Baert, Janis Jefferies, Joanna Frueh, Hagiwara Hiroko, Olabisi Silva. www.ktpress.co.uk n.paradoxa online issue no.15 and 16 July/Sept 2001 and July 2002 ISSN: 1462-0426 2 List of Contents Issue 15, July 2001 Katy Deepwell Interview with Lyndal Jones about Deep Water / Aqua Profunda exhibited in the Australian Pavilion in Venice 4 Two senses of representation: Analysing the Venice Biennale in 2001 10 Anette Kubitza Fluxus, Flirt, Feminist? Carolee 15 Schneemann, Sexual liberation and the Avant-garde of the 1960s Diary
    [Show full text]
  • Stan Brakhage 12/28/07 10:25 PM
    Stan Brakhage 12/28/07 10:25 PM contents great directors cteq annotations top tens about us links archive search Stan Brakhage b. January 14, 1933, Kansas City, Missouri, USA d. March 9, 2003, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada by Brian Frye Brian Frye is a filmmaker, curator and writer living in Washington DC. filmography bibliography articles in Senses web resources If Maya Deren invented the American avant-garde cinema, Stan Brakhage realized its potential. Unquestionably the most important living avant-garde filmmaker, Brakhage single-handedly transformed the schism separating the avant-garde from classical filmmaking into a chasm. And the ultimate consequences have yet to be resolved; his films appear nearly as radical today as the day he made them. Brakhage was born in 1933, and made his first film, Interim (1952), at 19. Notably prolific, he has completed several films most years since. To date, his filmography lists over 300 titles, ranging in length from a few seconds to several hours. Born in Kansas City, Missouri, attended high school in Central City, Colorado. He briefly attended Dartmouth College then left for San Francisco, where he enrolled at the California School of Fine Arts (now the San Francisco Art Institute). He had hoped to study under Sidney Peterson., but unfortunately, Peterson had left the school and the film program was no more, so Brakhage moved on. Like Deren, Brakhage came to understand film through poetry, and his earliest films do resemble those of Deren and her contemporaries. The early American avant-garde filmmakers tended to borrow liberally from the German Expressionists and Surrealists: mannered acting, symbolism/non sequitur, non-naturalistic lighting and psychosexual themes were common.
    [Show full text]
  • Over Front Cover
    Introduction: An art of the precarious Aaron Levy Edited Transcript: Master class with Carolee Schneemann Jordyn Feingold, Erica Levin, Aaron Levy, Emma Pfeiffer, Justin Reinsberg, Nicole Ripka, David Wilks, and Elliot Wolf sales rep: 1st ofa date: artist: cust: control: job #: Back Cover Front Cover rel #: Introduction: An art of the precarious there’s always these sort of tensions, of reference, but it’s a very succinct little Aaron Levy essay concerning the violence that has always been historically embedded against cats and women, the demonization of them both in early history and For many years, Carolee Schneemann’s work has foregrounded the relationship how that has its residual aspects still. between the artist’s body and the social body. Her art, her relationships, and her institutional negotiations have all foregrounded the fundamental relationship EL: I’ve been wondering about the repetition that happens in Mysteries of between the individual and socio-cultural conditions. She has enabled us at the Pussies, with the Finnish echo of what you say in English. Of course that Slought to think in similar terms, and to negotiate our position, identity, and probably has something to do with the context in which it was made, but for an practice in relation to the city and beyond. English audience there’s also something that I found really moving about how it takes these terrible accounts and turns them into something unrecognizable The word precariousness is often understood in terms of vulnerability, and if you don’t speak the language. There’s something really interesting about how the condition of being dependent on unknown conditions and uncertain that works in the piece that I found myself thinking about a lot afterwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluxus: the Is Gnificant Role of Female Artists Megan Butcher
    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Honors College Theses Pforzheimer Honors College Summer 7-2018 Fluxus: The iS gnificant Role of Female Artists Megan Butcher Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/honorscollege_theses Part of the Contemporary Art Commons, and the Other History Commons Recommended Citation Butcher, Megan, "Fluxus: The iS gnificant Role of Female Artists" (2018). Honors College Theses. 178. https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/honorscollege_theses/178 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Pforzheimer Honors College at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract The Fluxus movement of the 1960s and early 1970s laid the groundwork for future female artists and performance art as a medium. However, throughout my research, I have found that while there is evidence that female artists played an important role in this art movement, they were often not written about or credited for their contributions. Literature on the subject is also quite limited. Many books and journals only mention the more prominent female artists of Fluxus, leaving the lesser-known female artists difficult to research. The lack of scholarly discussion has led to the inaccurate documentation of the development of Fluxus art and how it influenced later movements. Additionally, the absence of research suggests that female artists’ work was less important and, consequently, keeps their efforts and achievements unknown. It can be demonstrated that works of art created by little-known female artists later influenced more prominent artists, but the original works have gone unacknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • PAJ 115 (2017), Pp
    Moving Marks Brooke Carlson Draw to Perform 3, live drawing performance symposium curated by Ram Samocha, The Crows Nest Gallery, London, July 30–31, 2016. he resurgence of drawing within contemporary art comes at a time in the digital age in which it is important to trace the traditions and conventions Tof what it means to draw. This resurgence is seen in recent museum exhi- bitions such as Drawing | THE BOTTOM LINE at S.M.A.K in Belgium (2015–16), annual festivals such as Drawing Now in Paris or The Big Draw in the UK, and in contemporary spaces such as Drawing Room, London (founded in 2002), specifically dedicated to the drawing discipline. Over the past few years, the per- formative aspect of drawing and the role of the body in the gesture has become increasingly prominent. Evidencing the physicality of the body in the drawing process has risen in response to the continually advancing digitalized and tech- nological versions of writing, drawing, and marking. By crossing over into the field of performance art, artists have begun to explore how far the gesture can be extended regarding method, process, materials, space, and duration. This investigation of performative drawing was highlighted at the international live drawing symposium Draw to Perform 3. Curated by Ram Samocha, an artist who specializes in performative explorations of drawing, the symposium opens up a platform for inquiry, experimentation, presentation, and discussion. From eighteen different countries, thirty-six artists with diverse practices and artistic backgrounds are drawn together to participate in the two-day event. The connec- tion between these artists is their constant query: “How can you make a mark and how can it be interpreted?” Organizing the event in two parts—a twelve-hour day of both short and long durational live performances, followed by a day of workshops mentored by six of the participating artists—the curator does nothing short of maximizing the opportunity for both artists and audiences to connect and share the experience of live drawing.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Moving in Time: Studies in the Visual Aesthetics of Avant-Garde Film
    Preferred Citation: Wees, William C. Light Moving in Time: Studies in the Visual Aesthetics of Avant-Garde Film. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1992 1992. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft438nb2fr/ Light Moving in Time Studies in the Visual Aesthetics of Avant-Garde Film William C. Wees UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · Oxford © 1992 The Regents of the University of California To my mother, Florence Myers Wees, and to the memory of my father, James Frank Sherman Wees. Preferred Citation: Wees, William C. Light Moving in Time: Studies in the Visual Aesthetics of Avant-Garde Film. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1992 1992. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft438nb2fr/ Preface As other writers have shown, the mainstream of film theory and criticism offers several modes of analysis suited to the study of avant-garde film. In the Introduction, I mention a few examples that seem most noteworthy. On the whole, however, these critical approaches seem ill-equipped to examine the specifically visual aspects of avant-garde film. Perhaps this is due in part to innate differences between critics' discursive thought and film artists' "visual thinking," but surely it is also due to theoretical presuppositions accompanying what Martin Jay has called "the anti-visual discourse of 20th century French thought," which has profoundly influenced film theory since the 1960s.[1] My goal is not to critique that discourse but to open (in some cases, reopen) lines of inquiry suitable to a pro-visual discourse, in which avant-garde filmmakers are already engaged and to which film theorists and critics should be able to make significant contributions of their own.[2] I will return to this issue in the Introduction, and each succeeding chapter will elaborate one or more of its implications.
    [Show full text]