DOCSLIB.ORG

The Permission Society

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Permission Society THE PERMISSION SOCIETY also by timothy sandefur The Right to Earn a Living: Economic Freedom and the Law The Conscience of the Constitution Cornerstone of Liberty: Property Rights in 21st- Century America (coauthored with Christina Sandefur) 0------------------= p ] p the ] p ] p Permission Society ] p ] p ] p ] p How the Ruling Class Turns ] p Our Freedoms into Privileges ] p ] p and What We Can Do About It ] p ] p ] p ] p TIMOTHY SANDEFUR ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p ] p Encounter Books ] p New York London ] l;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;' © 2016 by Timothy Sandefur All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Encounter Books, 900 Broadway, Suite 601, New York, New York, 10003. First American edition published in 2016 by Encounter Books, an activity of Encounter for Culture and Education, Inc., a nonproft, tax exempt corporation. Encounter Books website address: www.encounterbooks.com Manufactured in the United States and printed on acid- free paper. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ansi/niso z39.48ó 1992 (r 1997) (Permanence of Paper). first american edition library of congress cataloging- in- publication data Names: Sandefur, Timothy, author. Title: The permission society : how the ruling class turns our freedoms into privileges and what we can do about it/ by Timothy Sandefur. Description: New York : Encounter Books, [2016] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifers: lccn 2016002491 (print) | lccn 2016015051 (ebook) | isbn 9781594038396 (hardcover : alk. paper) | isbn 9781594038402 (Ebook) Subjects: lcsh: Liberty ñ United States. | Abuse of administrative power ñ United States. | Political culture ñ United States. Classifcation: lcc jc599.u5 s334 2016 (print) | lcc jc599.u5 (ebook) | ddc 323.4/90973ó dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016002491 CONTENTS Introduction ix chapter one 1 Charters of Liberty Granted by Power chapter two 28 The Free Society Versus the Permission Society chapter three 50 Prior Restraint of Speech chapter four 84 Prior Restraint and Businesses chapter five 104 The Competitorí s Veto chapter six 134 The Right to Use Private Property chapter seven 165 Guns, Drugs, and Sex chapter eight 195 The Future of Permission Afterword 215 Acknowledgments 217 Notes 219 Index 255 TO MY PARENTS, MARK AND JULIE, AND TO DANNY INTRODUCTION ot having to ask permission is one of the most essential Nparts of freedom. To be free means to be able to make oneí s own decisions ñ to take ìt he open road,î as Walt Whitman put it, ìw herever I chooseî 1 ñ without frst seeking some kind of approval from a superior. Freedom does not mean the right to do whatever pleases, regardless of harm to others ñ ìf or who could be free,î asked John Locke, ìw hen every other maní s humour might domi- neer over him?î Instead, freedom means a personí s ability to ì dis- pose, and order as he lists, his person, actions, possessions, and his whole property,î without having to obey ìt he arbitrary will of another.î 2 Freedom means the ability to follow oneí s own will: to do as one chooses with oneself ñ with oneí s own abilities and prop- erty ñ without being required to ask leave of somebody else.3 This is the diference between rights and permissions. We have freedom when we can make the operative choices about our lives ñ about what to say, what our religious beliefs are, what jobs to take, or what to build on our property. To the degree that we must ask someone else to let us act, we do not have rights but privileges ñ licenses that are granted, on limited terms, from someone who stands above us. Under the rule of monarchy, subjects enjoyed no freedoms except those that the ruler chose to allow. Someone wishing to ix Introduction travel, preach, start a business, publish a book, or engage in any number of other activities was frst required to obtain permission from the authorities. Under such rules, the people enjoyed only privileges, not rights. Their freedoms took the form of forbearance on the part of the ruler, which could be revoked at any time. When Americaí s founders broke with the mother country, they sought to reverse this polarity. The government of the new United States would not give permissions to people but would have to ask per- mission from the people. The founding fathers pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor to the proposition that all human beings are fundamentally equal, with none enjoying any special right to rule another. Government existed not to give people rights, but to protect the rights that were already theirs. Sadly, today America is gradually losing this principle of free- dom and becoming instead what I call the Permission Society ñ a society in which our choices are increasingly subject to govern- ment pre-ap proval. Whether it be building a house, getting a job, owning a gun, expressing oneí s political beliefs, or even taking a life-sa ving medicine, laws and regulations at the federal, state, and local levels now impose permit requirements that forbid us to act unless we frst get permission from the government. Thanks in par- ticular to ideas that originated with the early twentieth-c entury Progressive movement, todayí s leading politicians, judges, intellec- tuals, and activists now believe that we are not free unless and until the government says we are. This book examines this dangerous trend and how we can fght back. I look at some of the diferent ways permit requirements afect our daily lives: from the most famous such rule ñ the ìp rior restraint,î which forces people to get permission before they may speak ñ to rules that require property owners to pay the govern- ment money or give it land in exchange for permission to build homes, to laws that force business owners to get permission from their own competitors before they may start operating, to laws that require government approval to take life-sa ving medications. x Introduction These laws expand the power of the state, stife innovation and entrepreneurship, and do violence to the basic principle of equality on which our nationí s institutions rest. Our Constitution promises more ñ and Americans deserve better. xi CHAPTER ONE Charters of Liberty Granted by Power n 1792, in a short essay called ìC harters,î James Madison I succinctly explained what he thought was the essential difer- ence between the United States Constitution and the constitutions of every other nation in history. ì In Europe,î he wrote, ì charters of liberty have been granted by power. America has set the example ... of charters of power granted by liberty. This revolution in the practice of the world may, with an honest praise, be pronounced the most triumphant epoch of its history.î 1 The ì charters of liberty ... granted by powerî that Madison had in mind were the celebrated documents of freedom that kings and parliaments had issued throughout the ages, many still hon- ored today: Magna Carta of 1215, the English Petition of Right of 1628, the English Bill of Rights of 1689. Documents like these had made the British constitution ñ unwritten though it was ñ the fre- est in the world prior to the American Revolution. A British sub- ject enjoyed more room to express his opinions, more liberty to do as he liked with his property, more security against government intrusion, and greater religious toleration than the subject of any other monarchy in the known world. Yet for Madison and his contemporaries, that was not enough. 1 The Permission Society He and his fellow patriots considered ì charters of liberty... granted by powerî a poor substitute for actual freedom because however noble their words, such charters were still nothing more than pledges by those in power not to invade a subjectí s freedom. And because those pledges were ì granted by power,î they could also be revoked by the same power. If freedom was only a privilege the king gave subjects out of his own magnanimity, then freedom could also be taken away whenever the king saw ft. Whether Parliament could repeal the charters of British freedom was a point of controversy among lawyers and political thinkers up to, and after, the muskets began fring at Lexington and Concord. The British judge William Blackstone, whose four- volume Com- mentaries on the Laws of England was published in the 1760s and became a landmark in legal history, was proud that Great Britain was foremost in the world in terms of respecting the rights God gave all people. Yet at the same time, he believed that Parliamentí s power was ìsup remeî and ìab soluteî 2 and that, if it chose, it could change the rules of monarchical succession, alter the countryí s reli- gion, and ì do everything that is not naturally impossible.î 3 Parlia- mentí s ì omnipotenceî was so vast that it had power over ì[a]l l mischiefs and grievances, operations and remedies, that transcend the ordinary course of the laws.î 4 Other thinkers, most notably John Locke, had argued that individual rights took precedence over government power, so that the people always retain the right to overthrow tyrannical rulers. But Blackstone rejected this idea because it ì would jeopardise the authority of all positive laws before enacted.î As long as the British government exists, he wrote, ì the power of parliament is absolute and without control.î 5 The idea that Parliamentí s ìab soluteî power included a right to revoke protections for individual rights repelled Americaí s found- ers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Consolidation of Sra and False Memory Data
    A CONSOLIDATION OF SRA AND FALSE MEMORY DATA JAMES QUANNovember 1996 Portland, Oregon The purpose of this paper is to consolidate and present some of the major data for those skeptical of the existence of Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) and to suggest more mutual affirmation in pursuit of the truth in this area. This paper, nonetheless, attempts to critically examine both sides of the debate, namely:critical thinking and belief, “no official” evidence, the context of evidence, actual corroborative evidence (including a map of the McMartin Preschool tunnels), false memory, the sharp rise in MPD/DID diagnoses, and alternate explanations for the profound similarities in child and adult accounts.In light of the semantic difficulties inherent in “memories” it is important to avoid overgeneralizing on either side, and yet to fully accept that for which both memory and corroboration exists. 1. NATURE OF BELIEF No doubt, new experiences can broaden our perspectives.It is therefore not surprising that in a 1991 informal survey, 93% of APA therapists who have personal experience with adult SRA survivors stated they believe the memories of SRA are accurate. Contrary to accusations, many have been skeptical at first (Young, et al, 1990; Friesen, 1990; Calof, 1994), but:1) The quality of therapists’ experiences with their clients was sufficient to broaden their criteria for the existence of this crime; 2)There are extensive similarities in the accounts from both young children and adults throughout the country, many with minimal therapist suggestion and minimal cultural exposure; and 3) There is corroboration in some cases, yet for therapists to file reports with law enforcement would endanger the vital trust-based relationship and would not be in the client’s best interest for safety or privacy.
    [Show full text]
  • American Monsters: Tabloid Media and the Satanic Panic, 1970-2000
    AMERICAN MONSTERS: TABLOID MEDIA AND THE SATANIC PANIC, 1970-2000 A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Sarah A. Hughes May 2015 Examining Committee Members: Kenneth L. Kusmer, Advisory Chair, History Carolyn Kitch, Journalism Susan E. Klepp, History Elaine Tyler May, External Member, University of Minnesota, American Studies © Copyright 2015 by Sarah A. Hughes All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT “American Monsters: Tabloid Media and the Satanic Panic, 1970-2000,” analyzes an episode of national hysteria that dominated the media throughout most of the 1980s. Its origins, however, go back much farther and its consequences for the media would extend into subsequent decades. Rooted in the decade’s increasingly influential conservative political ideology, the satanic panic involved hundreds of accusations that devil-worshipping pedophiles were operating America’s white middle-class suburban daycare centers. Communities around the country became embroiled in criminal trials against center owners, the most publicized of which was the McMartin Preschool trial in Manhattan Beach, California. The longest and most expensive trial in the nation’s history, the McMartin case is an important focal point of this project. In the 1990s, judges overturned the life sentences of defendants in most major cases, and several prominent journalists and lawyers condemned the phenomenon as a witch-hunt. They accurately understood it to be a powerful delusion, or what contemporary cultural theorist Jean Baudrillard termed a “hyperreality,” in which audiences confuse the media universe for real life. Presented mainly through tabloid television, or “infotainment,” and integral to its development, influence, and success, the panic was a manifestation of the hyperreal.
    [Show full text]
  • They Couldn't Get My Soul': Recovered Memories, Ritual Abuse
    Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 1–19 ª The Author(s) / Le(s) auteur(s), 2018 They Couldn’t Get My Reprints and permission/ Reproduction et permission: Soul: Recovered sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0008429817748138 Memories, Ritual Abuse, journals.sagepub.com/home/sr and the Specter(s) of Religious Difference Megan Goodwin Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Abstract: During the 1980s and early 1990s, hundreds of women recovered memories of suffering extraordinary and nefarious torments at the hands of loved ones and trusted authority figures—a phenomenon that came to be known as satanic ritual abuse (SRA). In this article, I argue that late twentieth-century satanic ritual abuse discourse helped perpetuate intolerance toward non-Christian religions and foreclose conditions of possibility for benign religious difference in the United States. Psychological diagnoses related to satanic ritual abuse fueled popular anxieties regarding the sexual peril of American minority religions. Perpetuating diagnoses of satanic ritual abuse reinforced popular suspicions that religious minorities are dangerous, particularly when it comes to matters of sexuality. Re´sume´ : Au cours des anne´es 1980 et 1990, des centaines de femmes ame´ricaines ont raconte´ avoir e´te´ victimes de violences religieuses extraordinaires de la part de leurs proches (famille et figures d’autorite´). Ce phe´nome`ne a e´te´ de´signe´ par le terme de SRA (satanic ritual abuse). Cet article avance l’hypothe`se selon laquelle ces re´cits d’abus sataniques rituels ont soutenu et encourage´ un discours d’intole´rance envers les religions non-chre´tiennes aux E´tats-Unis.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Memory Myths and Realities
    Appendix A: Memory Myths and Realities Myth 1. You must identify the root cause of your unhappiness from the past in order to heal and be happy in the present. Reality 1. It is unfortunately the normal human lot to be frustrated and unhappy at various points in your life. There is no magic pill to make you happy, and your attitude in the present is much more the issue than anything that happened to you in the past. Myth 2. Checklists of “symptoms” are reliable tools to identify disorders. Reality 2. Beware of symptom checklists, particularly if they apply to nearly everyone in the general population. At one time or another, most people experience depres- sion, troubled relationships, ambivalence toward family members, and low self- esteem. These are not necessarily “symptoms” of anything other than the human condition. Myth 3. You can trust any therapist who seems compassionate, warm, wise, and caring. You do not need to ask about credentials, experience, training, philosophy, treat- ment approach, or techniques. Reality 3. Just because a therapist is warm and caring does not mean that he or she is com- petent or can help you. Training, philosophy, and treatment modalities are extremely important. Therapists who dwell unceasingly on your past are unlikely to help you cope with your present-day problems. Therapy should challenge you to change your way of thinking about and dealing with the present-day conflicts that sent you to therapy in the first place. © The Author(s) 2017 421 M. Pendergrast, The Repressed Memory Epidemic, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63375-6 422 Appendix A: Memory Myths and Realities Myth 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Wenatchee Child Abuse Prosecutions
    Wenatchee child abuse prosecutions The Wenatchee child abuse prosecutions in of raping her, as well as his other foster daughters. Perez Wenatchee, Washington, USA, also known as the immediately arrested Devereux, although the other girls Wenatchee Witch Hunt, occurred in 1994 and 1995 in the home did not support her story. The accuser, and are examples of the day care sexual abuse hysteria who has fetal alcohol syndrome, recanted the next day that was prevalent in the late 1980s and early 1990s.[1][2] to her DSHS caseworker, Paul Glassen, claiming Perez had pressured and intimidated her, and told her that Dev- ereux “did improper things”. When Glassen reported that 1 Accusations his client admitted to a false accusation, Perez immedi- ately arrested him for suspicion of witness tampering and coercion. While charges were later dropped, Glassen was The investigation began in February 1992 when Donna fired and was later investigated for being a participant in Everett, the seven-year-old daughter of Harold and Idella the alleged orgies. Juana Vasquez, Glassen’s supervisor, Everett, told her mother that two six-year-old boys in was also fired after questioning the investigation and the her class at school had attacked her in an alley and placement of children in foster care to facilitate crimi- had touched her genitals, a charge corroborated by her nal investigations. Glassen and his family then moved to brother. Idella Everett, who was developmentally dis- Vancouver, Canada, but Perez, who publicly stated that abled with an IQ in the “low 50’s,” reported the incident he believed Glassen was a “child rapist”, informed the to a state social worker, who suspected the mother and Royal Canadian Mounted Police that he was being inves- the child were lying in order to protect the child’s father tigated for over 50 counts of child abuse, causing him to (who was also illiterate and low-functioning), by blam- lose his job there as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Grandmothers Arrested Over Satanic Sex Abuse at School
    From The Times April 26, 2007 Grandmothers arrested over satanic sex abuse at school Richard Owen in Rome Three women teachers were among six people arrested yesterday accused of sedating and sexually abusing children as young as 3 at a school near Rome. The teachers — two of whom are grandmothers who had taught at the school and at Sunday school for decades — are said to have part in the repeated abuse of 15 children aged 3 and 5 for a year, filming them in sexual acts with satanic overtones at the teachers’ homes and in a wood. The others arrested were a female caretaker, a former producer of children’s programmes for the state television station RAI, and a local petrol pump attendant. The television producer is married to one of the arrested teachers. The alleged abuse — in the town of Rignano Flaminio, 25 miles (40km) north of Rome — came to light when some of the children began describing their “games” to their parents. They drew pictures of a “man in black” who wore a hood and drank his own blood, and said they had played a game in which “a wolf chases a squirrel and eats it”. They were warned that if they told their parents about the “games”, they would be “taken away from their mothers by devils”. If the truth were to come out and they were asked who had taught them to perform sexual acts, they were to say “my father”. The parents also reported bruising and swelling around their children’s genital areas and that they had returned home from school in a confused state.
    [Show full text]
  • ': Balancing Victims' and Defendants' Rights in the Child Sexual Abuse Case
    Fordham Law Review Volume 63 Issue 2 Article 7 1994 "The Best Of All Possible Worlds"': Balancing Victims' and Defendants' Rights in the Child Sexual Abuse Case Meredith Felise Sopher Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Meredith Felise Sopher, "The Best Of All Possible Worlds"': Balancing Victims' and Defendants' Rights in the Child Sexual Abuse Case, 63 Fordham L. Rev. 633 (1994). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol63/iss2/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "THE BEST OF ALL POSSIBLE WORLDS"': BALANCING VICTIMS' AND DEFENDANTS' RIGHTS IN THE CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE CASE MERIDITH FELISE SOPHER INTRODUCTION "It hurts emotionally, and it hurts physically and once that happens, once that intercourse2 or that molestation takes place, that's the end of childhood. We know that." "There are a lot of people who sexually offend their own children who are excellent parents, despite that one little hangup.... People think the worst thing that can happen3 to you is sexual abuse, but it's not. It's being removed from your parents." Although the views expressed above are clearly contradictory, they share the emotional fervor characteristic of the topic of child molesta- tion. The past two decades have witnessed the birth of both the battle against child sexual abuse4 and the backlash against that battle.5 Although child molestation has existed throughout history,6 the hor- rific nature of the crime traditionally discouraged its recognition.7 In the last ten years, however, the American media has focused intently on the issue of child sexual abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • New Wave in Children's Suggestibility Research: a Critique
    Cornell Law Review Volume 84 Article 3 Issue 4 May 1999 New Wave in Children’s Suggestibility Research: A Critique Thomas D. Lyon Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Thomas D. Lyon, New Wave in Children’s Suggestibility Research: A Critique , 84 Cornell L. Rev. 1004 (1999) Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol84/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW WAVE IN CHILDREN'S SUGGESTIBILITY RESEARCH: A CRITIQUE Thomas D. Lyont ABSTRACT The new wave in children's suggestibility research consists of a pres- tigious group of researchers in developmental psychology who ar- gue that children are highly vulnerable to suggestive interviewing techniques. Because of its scientific credentials, its moderate tone, and its impressive body of research, the new wave presents a serious challenge to those who have claimed that children are unlikely to allege sexual abuse falsely. Although we can learn much from the research, concerns over society's ability to detect abuse motivate three criticisms. First, the new-wave researchers assume that highly suggestive interviewing techniques are the norm in abuse investiga- tions, despite little empirical evidence to support this claim. Sec- ond, the research neglects the characteristics of child sexual abuse that both make false allegations less likely and increase the need to guard against a failure to detect abuse when it actually has occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Vampires, Archetypes, and Postmodern Turns in Late-1980S and ‘90S Cult TV Shows
    Sorcha Ní Fhlainn Manchester Metropolitan University United Kingdom A Very Special Vampire Episode: Vampires, archetypes, and postmodern turns in late-1980s and ‘90s cult TV shows ABSTRACT This article evaluates the importance of the TV vampire onscreen in science fiction, gothic, and horror-based cult TV series from the late 1980s to the late 1990s. The inclusion of the vampire as a peripheral character in series including Quantum Leap, The X-Files, Tales from the Crypt and Friday the 13th: The Series indicates, in light of postmodern cultural turns, that there exists an imperative to re-evaluate, satirize and reflexively explore the vampire as a necessary and evolving stock gothic character within the narrative and generic frameworks of each show. In looking at these postmodern vampiric evaluations in their own right, where the vampire is featured as the ‘monster of the week’, this article argues that these understudied yet apposite representations of the television vampire, prior to and following on from the success of Coppola’s Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1992), documents a distinct cultural shift and maturation in representing vampires in non-vampire based gothic television shows. Whether it is to reify, satirize and re-mould the vampire as a variant of ‘the Dracula template’ on the small screen, or to move beyond mere stock conventions, these specific vampire episodes document the continuing fluidity of screen vampires through TV’s episodic ‘creature feature’ framework, and offer differing and dynamic alternative representations of undeath beyond vampire-centric TV shows. KEYWORDS Vampires; The X-Files; Quantum Leap; Friday the 13th: The Series; Tales from the Crypt; Dracula; adaptation; subjectivity; bricolage; guest stars.
    [Show full text]
  • INN of COURT JANUARY 19, 2016 the Mcmartin Preschool Abuse Trial
    HARRY PHILLIPS AMERICAN INN OF COURT JANUARY 19, 2016 The McMartin Preschool Abuse Trial Jon Dowell, co-captain Samar Ali Richard Leiderman Barbara Holmes, co-captain Larry Crane-Moscowitz Sean Lyons Tyler Yarbro, reporter Sandy Garrett John Spragens Jackie Dixon, liaison Will Hicky Shannon Walker Tom Lawless Background The McMartin Preschool case was one of the earliest and largest child sexual abuse cases in this country. Although none of those charged were ever convicted, the 28-month trial was one of the longest and costliest criminal prosecutions in U.S. history, with seven years and $15 million spent investigating and prosecuting the case. The McMartin case is often cited as triggering a wave of preschool sexual abuse cases during the mid-1980s. In its wake, the McMartin case left hundreds of emotionally damaged children, as well as ruined careers for members of the McMartin daycare staff. Ray Buckey, one of the principal defendants in the case, spent five years in jail awaiting trial for a crime that today he is widely acknowledged to have never committed. The McMartin case originated with a call to police in Manhattan Beach, California by the mother of a young boy who briefly attended the McMartin Preschool. The mother reported that a school aide, Ray Buckey, had molested her son. Despite the fact that the young boy was unable to identify Ray from photos, and medical investigations of the boy showed no signs of sexual abuse, Buckey was arrested. The mother's reports of misbehavior at the McMartin Preschool became increasingly bizarre. Eventually most prosecutors came to recognize her allegations as the delusions of a paranoid schizophrenic.
    [Show full text]
  • Happened-And-The-Coverup
    http://ritualabuse.us/ritualabuse/articles/mcmartin-preschool-case-what-really- happened-and-the-coverup/ McMartin Preschool Case - What Really Happened and the Coverup 1) McMartin Preschool Revisited 2) Ray Buckey’s Press Corps and the Tunnels of McMartin 3) Cult and Ritual Abuse - It’s History, Anthropology, and Recent Discovery in Contemporary America - Indictment movie 4) Chronology of the McMartin Preschool Abuse Trials 5) Archaeological Investigations of the McMartin Preschool Site 6) Why Cults Terrorize and Kill Children - Eberle’s 7) Denying ritual abuse of children 8) Interview of Jackie MacGauley 9) The Dark Tunnels of McMartin 10) Investigative Issues in Ritual Abuse Cases 11) Paul and Shirley Eberle: A Strange Pair of Experts McMartin Preschool Revisited by Alex Constantine 1996 (in Virtual Government - CIA Mind Control Operations in America - Alex Constantine (Feral House Pub. 1997 ISBN 0-922915-45-8) Welcome to Manhattan Beach Paul Bynum graduated from college in 1972 and joined the Hermosa Beach police department a year later. At 31 he was promoted to the rank of chief detective. Bynum was not a traditional investigator. One fellow detective often thought he was “too bright to be a cop.” Off duty, he drove an MG and mixed with the ’60s survivors at the Sweetwater Café. In 1976 Bynum was assigned the investigation of the Karen Klaas murder. Klaas was the divorced wife of Bill Medley, a vocalist for the Righteous Brothers. She was raped and murdered one morning about an hour after dropping her five-year-old son off at the McMartin preschool in Manhattan Beach. Neighbors told police they’d been alarmed at the sight of a menacing stranger before the murder wandering through the neighborhood.
    [Show full text]
  • {Replace with the Title of Your Dissertation}
    Deviants and Dissidents: Children’s Sexuality and the Limits of Liberation A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY N’Jai-An Elizabeth Patters IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Regina Kunzel and Kevin P. Murphy, Advisors August 2010 © N’Jai-An Elizabeth Patters 2010 i Acknowledgements Writing this dissertation would not have been possible without the collective help of several individuals and institutions. It is my pleasure to thank them here. At Washington University, Andrea Friedman and Leslie Brown introduced me to history, and both offered me opportunities to think in new ways. Jim McLeod opened my eyes to the possibilities of scholarly engagement and persuaded me to consider graduate education. At Minnesota, I was blessed with a committee of advisors. Barbara Welke’s willingness to give even my most bizarre ideas the benefit of the doubt was a welcome introduction to academic advising. I continue to be inspired by her commitment and openness as a scholar. My interest in the postwar period was fostered by participating in a year-long seminar with Elaine Tyler May. She is a wonderful teacher, and I was fortunate to have her expertise and passion on my committee. Jennifer Gunn’s knowledge and generosity were true gifts, as was her willingness to read and discuss early drafts. Finally, my advisors Kevin Murphy and Regina Kunzel have been unwavering in their support of this project. They have read and re-read drafts, pushed me to develop my ideas, countered my resistance with a steady commitment to excellence, and supported my decision to pursue a different path.
    [Show full text]