Dynamics and formation of the Oort Cloud, Lille, 28-30 September 2011

The solar twin in Messier 67 A clue to the formation of the Oort Cloud?

Andreas Korn Bengt Gustafsson Hans Rickman

Uppsala University

The as a

Fuhrmann (2008) Fuhrmann

The Sun is a very normal, albeit fairly high-mass, thin-disc star. There are many like the Sun... A brief history of solar twins

• Pioneering work by Hardorp (1978) • A conference on solar analogs (Lowell Obs., 1997) settled for 18 Sco as the best known solar twin • Since then, the HIPPARCOS catalogue has been systematically searched for solar twins, producing dozens of near-twins and HIP 56948 (Meléndez & Ramírez 2007) with a solar-like lithium abundance • Using FLAMES at the VLT, Pasquini et al. (2008) looked for solar-twin candidates in M67: they identified five high-probability solar twins The solar twin in M67

• So far, one star has been followed up with high- resolution (R=47,000) and high S/N ratio (180 pixel-1). • Except for a possibly slightly enhanced metallicity, M67-1194 is a true solar twin (Önehag et al. 2011):

• Even its equatorial rotational velocity and its lithium abundance are compatible with the solar values.

Comparing the spectra

iron

c

iron

alcium alcium

sodium sodium

calcium

silicon

nickel nickel

c

ormalizedflux

alcium

n

wavelength [Å] Detailed Sun-twin composition

Relative to solar twins in the field, the Sun is rich in volatile elements and poor in high-

Tcond refractories

Meléndez et al. (2009) Detailed Sun-twin composition

Relative to solar twins in the field, the Sun is rich in volatile elements and poor in high-

Tcond refractories

Chemically, M67- 1194 resembles Önehag et al. (2011) the Sun!

Age determination for M67

• Most age determinations in the literature scatter around 4 Gyr, both from fitting of the turnoff region and the cooling sequence (e.g. Magic et al. 2010; Bellini et al. 2010) • M67-1194 allows us to age-date M67 with a reduced sensitivity to systematic effects: , compatible with the solar age • Using the methods of Baumann et al. (2010), we would derive

Given remaining modelling uncertainties, M67 may well be as old as the Sun! M67: orbital parameters

U and V velocities fairly compatible M67’s current position with the Sun’s orbit

But: W / zmax solar orbit are much larger

Caused by interaction with a GMC?

To be investigated... Davenport & Sandquist (2010) A working hypothesis

The chemical similarity of M67-1194 and the Sun prompts us to explore the possibility that the Sun originated from a stellar cluster with properties much like those of M67.

As a starting point for dynamical investigations, we take M67. M67 – the Sun’s birth cluster?

Need for a relatively rich birth cluster: – Meteoritic evidence for very short-lived isotopes (26Al, 60Fe etc.) – Photo-evaporation of the solar nebula – Extraction of Sedna?

A not too rich birth cluster: – Limit to photo-evaporation efficiency – Preserve planetary orbits Our model for M67

• Current mass ~1400 M, consistent with an initial mass of ~18700 M (Hurley et al. 2005) • Stellar mass distribution from the IMF of Kroupa et

al. 1993  = 0.48 M for an even mix of single stars (0.32 M) and binaries (0.64 M) • Half-mass radius ~3.9 pc  Plummer model scale radius ~3 pc • Relaxation time ~300 Myr  Estimated mass at

LHB epoch (~700 Myr after to) ~ 12400 M Constraints on cluster size

Adams (2010)

)

N P(

 Save the planetary orbits

N According to this crude estimate, M67 would be too rich and massive! Saving the planets

• Using a Plummer model for M67 at t=0 and t=700 Myr with the respective masses, we compute for different radial distances: – the local number density of cluster stars – the distribution of relative velocities at close encounters – the resulting encounter flux

• Destructive encounters are taken as likely distance those within 250 AU range  Residence times ~1 Gyr are OK! Encounter efficiencies

Blue: 1000 random stars of the current solar neighborhood

Yellow: 10000 random M67

encounters at r = r0

• The impulse imparted to an object at a close encounter goes as M/V – this is very much larger in M67 than in the Galactic disk Saving the Oort Cloud?

• Suppose that a primordial Oort Cloud was formed as a by-product of giant planet formation, extending to ~104 AU

• During the 700 Myr until the LHB, at r = r0, a closest encounter at ~450 AU is expected

• The median value of M/V is ~ 0.4 M/(km/s) • Calculating the solar impulse by hyperbolic deflection,

one gets V ~ 2.8 km/s • This is the escape velocity at ~ 225 AU; thus most of the primordial OC escapes the Solar System If the Sun stayed in M67 until the LHB, a primordial Oort Cloud would be destroyed! Creating an Oort Cloud

• Typical M67 encounters expected, even in the outer parts, during ~100 Myr at ~1000 AU will strongly perturb scattered disk objects with a ~103-104 AU • Thus, in the Nice Model, the LHB-related formation of a scattered disk in M67 would inevitably lead to the creation of an OC inner core • If the Sun stayed too long in M67, the survival of this OC might be compromised Conclusions

One swallow does not make a summer, but... • We are learning more about the Sun and its planetary system (external constraints on the stability of planetary orbits and the Oort Cloud) by studying solar twins • We are learning more about star formation by studying clusters (cf. Ken Croswell (2004): M67 – the Ultimate Survivor)

• Sun  M67: a reasonable scenario?

M67 (HMS Nämdö) Behold M67-1194