DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON
CLIMATE PROOFING
Taupadar Watershed, Pottangi, Koraput
LIFE ACADEMY OF VOCATIONAL STUDIES (LAVS) 0 Page POTTANGI, KORAPUT
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Contents
# Particulars Page # 1 Introduction 3-4 2 Project Profile 5-9 3 Description of Project 10-15 4 Climate Change Scenario 16-21 5 Impact of Climate Change 21-25 6 Mitigation Strategies 25-34 7 Monitoring Framework 34-36 8 Annexure 3 Format for Detailed project Report 8.1 Summary of proposed Investment: CCA Measures 37 8.2 Assessment of Vulnerability to Climate Change and Investment Options 38 8.3 Baseline and Projected Targets with CCA Measures 39 8.4.1 Net Planning wise Soil and Water Conservation Measures 40-53 8.4.2 Details of Engineering structures/ Details of Proposed structures 54-57 8.4.3 Baseline and Summary of S&WC Measure Investment Plan 58 8.4.4 Source of Finance for S&WC 59-60 8.5.1 Soil Baseline and Targets of soil status 60 8.5.2 Agriculture Land Use – Baseline and Targets 61 8.5.3 Soil improvement and productivity enhancement plan (activities) 62 8.5.4 Source of Finance for soil improvement 63 8.5.5 Activity wise technical norms for soil improvement and justification thereof 64 8.6.1.1 Promotion of sustainable NRM, CCA Farming, livelihood and food security 65 8.6.1.2 Source of Finance for sustainable NRM and CCA Farming 66 8.6.1.3 Activity wise technical norms for sustainable NRM and CCA Farming justification 67 thereof 8.6.2.1 Income by households (Focus Group Discussion) 67 8.6.2.2 Livelihoods and IGA promotion investment plan 68 8.6.2.3 Livelihood and IG Activities - Source of finance 68 8.6.2.4 Livelihood and IG Activities - Activity wise technical norms 69 8.6.3.1 Baseline and Targets 69 8.6.3.2 Food and Nutritional Security - Pre CCA - Watershed 70 8.6.3.3 Target for Food and Nutritional Security - Post CCA - Watershed 70 8.7 Mitigation of CCA Risk 71 8.8.1 Plan for Investment/ activities for accompanying measures 72 8.8.2 Source of Finance for accompanying measures 73 8.8.3 Justification and Norms for accompanying measures 73 9 Annexure 4 9.1 Result Framework 74-79 10 Annexure 5 10.1 Stakeholder Consultation Report 80-92 11 Annexure 6 11.1 Progress and Fund Utilization Report 93 Attachments
1 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Abbreviations and acronyms
AF Agro-Forestry 0C Degree Centigrade CBO Community Based Organisation CC Climate Change/ Crop Cultivation CCA Climate Change Adaptation CCT Continuous Contour Trench CIG Common Interest Group DH Dryland Horticulture DL Drainage Line DLT Drainage Line Treatment DPR Detailed Project Report EGB Earthen Gully Plug FB Field Bund FNS Food and Nutritional Security GIS Geographical Information System GP Gully Plug Ha. Hectare HH House Hold IGA Income Generating Activity IMD Indian Meteorological Department IWMP Integrated Watershed Management Programme KG Kilogram MF Maintenance Fund MGNREGS Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme MIS Management Information System NB Nala Bund NGO Non- Government Organisation NRM Natural Resource Management PFA Project Facilitating Agency PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal PRI Panchayati Raj Institutions PRIP Participatory Rural Investment Planning RAP-Index Rainfed Area Prioritisation Index
2
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Introduction: While watershed development has proved to enhance the water tables in the area and thus dramatically increase agriculture outputs, it has also brought about many changes within families and the village – politically, socially, and culturally. How is agriculture affected (despite good watershed development) by the varying weather conditions currently experienced? What are the challenges that the farmers now face within this context of climate change? What are the factors that influence agriculture that farmers and implementing agencies need to understand, so as to ensure sustained agriculture productivity?
Aforestation plays an important role in the regeneration of degraded watersheds. Hundreds of thousands of trees are planted. The choices are made by the local community and are generally local varieties. Yet, in the post project period, trees are cut. Trees are an important carbon sink, important for climate change mitigation. Therefore it was found necessary to understand the purposes that trees serve in the lives of the local community.
As Climate Change is universal, there are programmatic and policy implications Climate. Change imbalances the livelihoods of communities and consequently increases their vulnerability. Various coping strategies are described, to battle impacts associated with climatic variations. Climate Change is poorly understood by the participants. Men and women viewed the impact of the seasonal variations differently. Men mostly mentioned economic security while women talked about food security as its consequence. Though coping strategies are differently expressed, they implicitly boil down to economic security. The community was also not aware about sustainable strategies. The community has little scientific information about the causes of Climate Change. They state their understanding of the causes of seasonal variations. At the same time they are not able to connect these causes to Climate Change.
Seasonal variation is defined as the repetitive and predictable movement around the trend line in one year or less. It is detected by measuring the quantity of interest for small time intervals, such as days, weeks, months or quarters. It is well known that the rural poor are adversely affected by Climate Change. Climate Change and/ or seasonal variations affect their livelihoods and make them more vulnerable. Of course, they devise and adopt certain strategies to cope with the effects of Climate Change.
Livelihoods are understood as ways and means of making a living. It comprises of capabilities, assets (both material and social resources) and activities as means of living. Livelihood constitutes all productive tasks. Livelihoods essentially revolve around resources such as land, crops, seed, labour, knowledge, cattle, money, social relationships etc. Livelihoods are also about creating and embracing new opportunities. While gaining a livelihood, or attempting to do so, people may, at the same time, have to cope with certain risks and uncertainties, such as erratic rainfall, diminishing resources, pressure on the land, changing life cycles, chaotic markets, increasing food prices, inflation, epidemics etc. These uncertainties, together with new emerging
opportunities, influence how material and social resources are managed and used, and on the
choices people make. 3
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Coping is thoughts and actions directed at the resolution or mitigation of a problematic situation. There are a number of ways in which coping may be attempted. In general, problem- focused coping strategies are the most effective way for dealing with stress. Coping mechanisms and/or strategies are closely related to the idea of threat and survival. Coping is a capacity, a capacity to respond and recover from some stressful condition like a disaster. There are no standards for coping strategies, they vary depending on, and are influenced by socio-cultural factors. People can adopt new coping mechanisms on the basis of lessons learned in the past. Sustainability has different understandings like the financial viability (usual long term) of an activity and environmental sustainability issues.
Link between Climate Change and livelihoods and coping strategies: Climate Change will impact natural and human systems to alter the productivity, diversity and functions of many ecosystems and livelihoods around the world. For poor, natural resource dependent communities, Climate Change may compound existing vulnerabilities. As the availability and quality of natural resources decline, so does the security of their livelihoods. Limited resources and capacities for responding to stresses such as floods and droughts constrain their ability to meet their basic needs and ability to move out of poverty. With Climate Change impacts already being observed, there is an urgent need for adaptive response measures. By understanding the dynamics of the livelihoods of poor and near poor, there is a need to understand how they will be affected by Climate Change impacts, how they might respond with the resources they have, what additional resources may be required and how these conditions can be reflected and built upon for successful adaptation strategies. The impacts of climate variability and Climate Change must be addressed by interacting with and understanding the community’s view points. Evidence has shown that Climate Change will affect the distribution and quality of Indian natural resources which will ultimately threaten the livelihoods of the most poor and marginalized sector of the population who are closely tied with the India’s natural resources. With this background, it is necessary to understand the community’s perception about Climate Change and coping strategies.
The changing climate has impact on water availability and its quality, agriculture production, food quality which has an impact on vulnerable groups. Smaller farmers are dependent on timely and sufficient rainfall during the monsoon for a high crop yield. However, with the changing climate, rainfall pattern has become erratic. Long dry spells between untimely and erratic precipitation, exposes farmers to too many risks including droughts, floods, diseases of
crops and animals as well as market irregularities.
4 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Project Profile
Location and Topography
The Deomali Watershed is located in Pottangi Block of Koraput district in the state of Odisha. Having a treatable area of 681.83 ha, it is situated by the left side of the National highway at a distance of 30 Km from Pottangi Block. Deomali Peak is situated at a distance of 60 km from Koraput with an elevation o 1,672 meter. It is the highest peak in Odisha and the tallest in the whole of the Eastern Ghats. Deomali is dotted with streams and deep valleys, and dense forest. The project areas are surrounded by hillocks and forest which contributes to the internal drainage system of the project area. Mainly uplands are undulated and uneven with small stone patches.
The average slope is 3-5 per cent and the general drainage pattern is dendritic.
5
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
The district is composed with undulating tracts of high ridges and low valleys. The different types of land like hills & hill slope, foot hills, up land, medium and low land are found in Pottangi block.
Climate and Soil
The climate of the area is warm and humid. The district normally records large variation in day and night temperature. Pottangi block is coming under Eastern Ghat Highland zone. The normal rainfall of Pottangi block is 1948.5 mm which is normally distributed in 75-81 rainy days. The major source of rainfall is South–West monsoon and contribution of North–East monsoon is very little. Nearly 87 per cent of annual rainfall is received in monsoon months from June–September. The erratic rainfall and drought situation is happening frequently which affect the economic condition of the village people. Most of the people depend on rain-fed agriculture for their livelihoods. There are large variations in the day and night temperature. The summer season starts from the beginning of March. The temperature drops down with the onset of monsoon towards the second week of June and throughout the monsoon the weather remains cool. December is the coldest month. The maximum and minimum temperature of Pottangi block is 380C and 120C. The major soil types are red (alfisol), laterite and lateritic (ultisol and oxisol) with limited patch of forest soil (humults). Available P and K are in medium range while available N is in low to medium range. Hardly 5-10 per cent of cultivated land in project area is irrigated. About 80 per cent of landholders belonging to small and marginal categories have access to only 40 per cent of total landholding whereas 20 per cent of landholders belonging to big category have access to 60 per cent of landholdings. Soil erosion is moderate and in few patches, it is stern. Soil slopes are moderate. Demographic Information and Livelihoods
Taupadar village is having 165 households with a total population of 695. Of the total population of 625 males and females are 356 and 339 in n umber respectively. Out of the 165 households, 6% of household were under the well-off category, 25% HHs under manageable, 32% under poor and 37% under very poor category before project implementation. The livelihoods of the people in the village are mostly agriculture, livestock management, forestry and wage earning. Over all agriculture is the major source of livelihood followed by agricultural labour wages and vending in watershed village. The collection of NTFPs has traditionally been an important livelihood strategy for tribal groups.WSD has supported these diversification strategies in a number of ways. NGO projects have paid specific attention to providing opportunities to the poor to diversify their livelihoods, through the formation of self help groups for women, the landless and other marginal groups. These groups undertake a number of activities ranging from traditional crafts (such as leaf plate making; weaving and basket making), mushroom cultivation, forestry activities and so on.
Watershed Profile
The watershed was supported by NABARD-WDF Scheme of Govt. of India. The code number of 6
the WS is 0405010407060102. It is located in Longitude 820 5’ E to 830 23’ E and Latitude: 180 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
13’ N to190 10’ N. The elevation above Mean Sea Level is 1200 m. Geographical area of the WS is 704.18 ha with treated area of 681.83 ha. Arable land is 409.34 ha while non-arable land is 272.49 ha. The land particulars of the WS are indicated below.
Particulars Area in ha Upland 137.69 Medium land 176.23 Low land 95.42 Village forest 204.83 Pasture land 12.31 Cultivable waste 13.09 Uncultivated waste 41.46
The implementing period of the project is 2009-2014. And it was implemented by Life Academy of Vocational Studies (LAVS), Pottangi with a project outlay of Rs 8217300.20 under FIP. The details of the Project are outlined below.
Project Details Name of Project: Taupadar Micro-Watershed Block: Pottangi District: Koraput Name of NGO : Life Academy of Vocational Studies (LAVS) Project commencement date: 08.02.2012(FIP) Project Completion date: 30.06.2015 (FIP) Project Data: Sl. No. Parameters Data 1 Area of Watershed (ha) 704.18 i CBP (ha) 103.00 ii FIP (ha) 601.18 iii Total treatable area (ha) 681.83 iv Forest area (ha) 204.83 v Total Watershed area (ha) 704.18 2 Villages covered (nos., name) 1-Taupadar 3 Population and families covered 695, 165 HHs (indicate SC/ST/OBC families) Population :SC-42, ST-649, OBC-04 Programme Goal Investments in improvement, stabilisation, conservation of natural resources mainly soils is made to minimise the risk of climate change and to increase the productivity and income of communities living in watersheds. The purpose of the Projects under the programme is to reduce vulnerability to climate change of small scale farmers in selected watersheds through the stabilization, enhancement and sustainable use of soil and water resources.
Outcome
Adaptive capacity of the communities in watersheds is strengthened and their vulnerability to
climate change is reduced. 7 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Project Interventions under the Programme
Following major project interventions are proposed to be implemented under the watershed project over a period of 4 years of time period.
Adaptation of existing measures and implementation of required additional physical measures for soil and water conservation, erosion and degradation control, land reclamation and land improvement on common and private land;
Promotion of measures to improve soil quality and soil health, e.g. integrated nutrient management using organic fertilizers, tank silt application, mulching, green leaf application, vermi-composting, promotion of agro-forestry and related soil protection measures;
Promotion of sustainable farming, productivity enhancement and natural resource management practices and climate change adaptation measures, e.g. crop diversification, crop intensification, crop water budgeting, micro-drip-irrigation, nutrient enrichment, organic fertilizers and integrated pest management;
Implementation of measures to improve nutritional security, like kitchen gardens, backyard poultries or group fisheries, especially in tribal areas;
Promotion of livelihood options (on-farm/off-farm), using existing village-level revolving funds, partly topped-up through project funds on a grant basis;
On-going capacity building and institution building for above mentioned activities and especially climate change risk, adaptation and mitigation measures through Project Facilitating Agencies;
Implementation of a GIS based programme management information system;
Systematization and documentation of local experiences and best practices, publications, trainings, policy dissemination as well as workshops, exposure visits, events for knowledge exchange.
Role of various Stakeholders at Watershed level Gram Sabha (GS)
GS would be the responsible institution for ensuring the implementation of the project GS would pass resolution in favour of implementation of the project and also adhering to various project rules/regulations GS would entrust the VWC for the project management and monitor the work regularly GS would ensure the collaboration and participation of PRI in project management
8
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Village Watershed Committee (VWC) VWC would be reorganised if necessary, based on inducting new members in place of non active members based on the previous functions VWC should have members of various hamlets, SHG and CIG representatives, landless and other social groups VWC would be responsible for project finance along with PFA and would be accountable to NABARD and GS
It would mobilise villagers for various measures as planned by the project and resolve conflicts if any VWC would work in close collaboration with PFA and Community in planning, implementation, monitoring and reporting VWC shall ensure equity and negotiate with community for equitable and sustainable use of project benefits It would operationalize the maintenance fund and regularly contribute to the same from farmers VWC shall mobilise farmers for the repair and maintenance of various measures already implemented It shall report to GS on a regular basis on various measures and investments It would ensure transparency and social accountability in financial transactions
Self Help Groups (SHG) Existing SHGs would be revived and new SHGs would be formed in the watershed SHGS would consist of 10-15 members and of both men and women groups Members from landless and poorest of poor families would be organised into SHGs on a priority SHG shall undertake savings and lending on regular basis It would be actively involved in planning and implementation of various project measures SHGs would be involved in various income generation activities including land and NRM-based activities It would be responsible for revolving fund (RF) guided and supported by VWC and PFA
Common Interest Group (CIG) / Common Livelihood Group (CLG) It would be smaller groups of individuals based on a common interest such as organic farmers, bio fertiliser/pesticide producers etc.
They shall be formed in the initial stages and be involved in the planning and implementation strategy
They shall access credit from RF
CLG could be in the long term become input supplier/ producer agency 9
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Vulnerability Assessment Vulnerability1 assessment is an integrated estimation of degree to which target population is susceptible to and unable to cope with adverse effects of climate change including climate variability and extreme events. It includes assessment of character, magnitude and rate of climate change and variation to the watershed is exposed; the sensitivity (direct and indirect impact); and adaptive capacity of the constituents of this watershed. Bottom-up approach was carried out to conduct analysis of people (social groups) affected by climate change at household, community and village levels .The assessment was done for identification of current and future vulnerable hot-spots. PFA applied bottom-up approach in these vulnerable hot spots to validate results and devise specific adaptation measures.
Top-down approach in the context of climate change was also incorporated from the finding of different organisations and research agencies working in this region for current and future vulnerability of different sectors of Koraput region, the bottom-up approach provides information on current vulnerability of different sections of the society in the watershed.
These two approaches was also integrated by downscaling or up scaling in consultation with stakeholders and local assessment for comprehensive adaptation.
Brief Description of KORAPUT district
Koraput district is situated in the South-Eastern region of Odisha surrounded by Raygada, Nowrangpur and Malkangiri districts. The district is adjoining to Madhya Pradesh in the North- West and Andhra Pradesh in the South-East. The geographical area of the district is 8.38 lakh ha. Which is 5.38 per cent of the state? It is situated in between 18*-10* and 83*-20* East longitude. Physic-graphically the district is contiguous to the main land of Eastern ghat. The different areas in this zone are situated at altitude of 150-1000 meters above the MSL. The highest mountain peak of the state “Deomali” is located in POttangi block where the High Altitude Research Station is situated. The district is characters by scattered sharp, isolated hills with thin forest cover.
The district consists of two sub-division, 14 CD blocks, 197 Gram Panchayats and 1997 revenue villages. There is one Municipality (Jeypore) and three Notifies Areas councils (Sunabeda, Kotpad& Koraput) in the district. The district is famous for Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), sunabeda and NALCO, Damanjodi.
Soils: the soils of the district are mostly red, mixed red and yellow, alluvial and red and black. The texture is sandy loam to sandy clay loam. As per soil test the soils are acidic and poor in fertility status. They are highly eroded, rich in iron and aluminum and are usually deficient in boron and zinc. Soil acidity and iron toxicity are the problems in most of blocks of the district.
Rivers: The Rivers flowing in the district are perennial in nature in that they remain dry for major part of the year. The important rivers flowing in the district are Patali River Besides these rivers there are a number of small hilly streams flowing in the district.
10 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Irrigation: the Koraput district has got 35% of the net sown area under different sources of irrigation. Upper Kolab project is the major irrigation project of the district which provides irrigation to 37.29 lakh ha in Jeypore, Kotpad, Borigumma and Kundra blocks. Very low land called Jolah which are wide, terraced valley bottoms are endowed with perennial flow water. Of the total 35% land under irrigation, 17% from major sources, 2% from lift irrigation sources. 0.6% from wells and 14% from other sources are irrigated. The agriculture is mainly depending on rains and irrigation. The total registered ayacut under the Medium Irrigation projects is 37.29 lakh Ha. Farmers normally raise paddy and Sugarcane through this irrigation facility. Farmers usually grows paddy, Tomato, Maize, the farmers usually cultivate ground nut, Red gram, Tomato and Millets and Cereals with the support of rain water.
Industries: There are many industries in the district which contribute for the economic development of the district for example Hindustan Aeronautic Limited (HAL) in Sunabeda and NALCO in Damanjodi.
Rainfall: The District has the benefit of receiving rainfall during both the southwest and north East monsoon periods. While the normal rainfall of the District for the south west Monsoon period is 1521.8 mm in 82 rainy days that for North east Monsoon period is 1396 mm. The rainfall received during the winter period and hot weather period is negligible their respective normals being 12 mm and 88 mm. The annual normal rainfall of the District is 934 mm. June to September is usual monsoon months where 79% of rainfall is record in about 61 days.
Analysis of different Climatologically parameter 100 years from 1900-2000::
Annual Mean Max. Temperature 11
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Annual Mean Minimum Temperature
12
Average Mean temp. Annual Mean Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Diurnal temp. ranges - Annual Mean
Potential Evapotransipiration Annual Mean 13
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Precipitation Average Yearly Koraput
Wet Day Frequency Annual Mean
14
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Physio-geographic features of the Pottangi Block:
Due to its location within the physiographic region of the Eastern Ghats, the Pottangi project area is characterized by undulating terrain with slope gradients even higher than 50 percent and a range of altitudes varying between 800m to 1600m above MSL. Koraput and its adjoining districts belong to the AEZ 12 Agro-Ecological Zone. Koraput district mainly falls under 12.1 zone, but a small part at the border to Andhra Pradesh is part of AEZ 12.2 (NBSS). Soil erosion, low fertility, soil acidity and poor drainage are the major constraints occurring in this region (NBSS). The climate is warm and humid with mean maximum and minimum temperatures of 30.6 °C and 17.03 °C respectively (Koraput District). April and May are the hottest months whereas December and January are the coldest months of the year. During December and January occasionally temperature drops below 10 °C at night. The average annual rainfall of the last 22 years has been recorded as 1,540 mm with highest precipitation from June to September.
The precipitation patterns of the region are highly variable with high incidences of drought and flood occurrence. Koraput district had witnessed 16 medium droughts since the beginning of the last century (the last ones in 1987, 1989, 1993, 1996) and one severe drought in 1965. In the same period 12 medium floods (last in 1977 and 1990) and two severe floods (in 1970 and 2001) were recorded.
The project area falls under rain fed mixed farming and the dependency on rainfall is very high; irrigation facilities are only partially present. The climate allows good cultivation between May and October when rainfall is above 100mm/ month. Ragi, paddy, niger, maize, lentil and wheat are the main crops. During the winter months wheat and vegetables are also grown on some fields.
The soils of Koraput region are mainly developed from the Charnockite and Khondalite rock formations and the underlying parent rock is mostly granite and gneiss. The main soil types of the area are yellow to brown soils, red sandy to loamy soils and alluvial soils (although the latter are confined near to the large river beds and do not fall in the project area). The silt and clay content increases from the upper towards the lower reach. With an increase of slope steepness the soil depth is decreasing and the amount of gravels is rising (CSWCRTI 2004). On hillock patches rock exposures occur. In gently sloping areas the soil depth is deep to very deep. The water holding capacity of the soil is generally very poor since the soil structure is mostly single grained or of a weak granular type. The soila also exhibit problems of crust formation (CSWCRTI 2004).
Rainfall results in heavy leaching which leads to soil acidity and low base saturation. The soil in general is acidic with pH varying from 4.5 to 6.2. Nitrogen, Phosphorus and organic matter content in the soil are mostly low and there is a deficiency of micro-nutrients like Boron, Zinc and Molybdenum, particularly in upland areas and waterlogged jholas (stabilized streambeds). Potassium, iron and aluminum content are mostly found to be medium to high. Due to poor organic matter content, steep slopes and unsuitable land use patterns water erosion is a serious
problem in the area (CSWCRTI 2004).
15
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Climate Change and Coping Mechanism: Climate change is a scientific proven phenomenon that includes any change in the climate, whether due to its natural variability or as a result of human activity. Today, the effects of climate change are felt all over the world and climate change is no longer a theory or a meteorological model that interests only a few people. Because of the scientific work that has been done, more people now understand how human activities are hastening it. There is also more and more recognition that climate change seriously threatens sustainable human development. Now and in future, it affects or will affect agriculture, energy, human health, food security, the economy, and physical infrastructure. However, the present analysis focuses on impact of climate change on agriculture, livestock production and aquaculture in the project area. Besides it also deals with climate change and gender on broader perspective.
Climate change has the potential to harm societies and ecosystems. In particular, agriculture, forestry, water resources, human health, coastal settlements, and natural ecosystems will need to adapt to a changing climate or face diminished functions pattern. It is considered as one of the serious threat for sustainable development with adverse impact expected on, natural resources, food security, economic activities, human health and physical infrastructure.
Climate change is upon us and we are faced with the challenge of understanding what is really happening, predicting what is likely to happen and more importantly, finding appropriate ways to address the key impacts. Hence, while planning for a project on Climate Change Adaptation in the Chatwa watershed of Nandapur block of Koraput district, we began with the key question and went on probing some aspects of this question:
Drought Drought can be managed or tackled by two approaches i.e., crisis management and risk management. The former encompasses management of drought on ad hoc basis and in a piece meal way, half-heartedly without planning. Risk management is a long-term policy, which includes drought proofing/preventive measures/long term strategies and drought mitigation/curative measures/short-term strategies. Two important options for drought proofing are management of natural resources (soil and water) on watershed basis and alternative land use systems. The contingency measures for drought under different scenario are:
A. Early season drought Scenario-1: Early onset and sudden stoppage of monsoon Uplands When there is more than 50% mortality, re-sowing the crop up to July after receipt of sufficient rain water Sowing of low duty non-paddy crops like ragi (Bhairabi, Dibyasinha, Godavari), Greengram (K-851,Sujata, PDM-54), Blackgram (T-9, Pant U-19, Pant U- 30,Sarala), Cowpea (SEB-2, Pusa Barsati, Utkal Manika), Sesame (Uma, Usha, Nirmala, Prachi), Ricebean (RBL-6, BRB-1), Castor (Jyoti, Kranti, Harita) is preferred to
paddy 16
If mortality is less than 50% the crop may be gap filled Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Cultivation of vegetables-cowpea, guar, radish, runner bean, okra, cauliflower, Brinjal, tomato where ever possible Niger (Deomali, Alasi-1) and horsegram (Urmi) to be sown in August. Spraying the crop with potassium silicate (10%) or Cycocel (10 ppm) to overcome drought effect In row sown crops hoeing, weeding to be followed by ridging to the base of the crop rows at 20 DAS for in-situ moisture conservation
Medium and Low land
If rice plant population is less than 50%, re-sowing the crop. o Early medium duration varieties may be selected. o Sprouted seeds may be direct seeded or fresh seedlings of early varieties may be raised for transplanting. If rice plant population is more than 50%, weeding and adjusting the plant population by khelua and clonal propagation. Raising community nursery of rice at a reliable water source to save time for further delay. Sowing seeds at 3-5 cm depth by punji method (10-15 seeds at one point), covering it with a mixture of FYM:SSP (10:1) to avoid seedling mortality due to moisture stress in low land
Scenario-2: Late onset, uplands not covered till mid July
Sowing drought tolerant non-paddy crops like ragi, greengram, blackgram, cowpea, guar, sesame, castor in place of upland rice Maize and cowpea may be grown in the Ist week of August to meet the fodder crisis Niger (Deomali, Alasi-I) and horsegram (urmi) are to be sown in August Growing sweet potato vars. Like Gouri, Shankar, Samrat, Shreenandini, Shreebhadra, Shreeratna, in ridges and allow the furrows to conserve rainfall Growing vegetables like tomato, cauliflower, radish, brinjal, runner bean, in the inland hilly districts and cowpea, guar, lady’s finger and chilli in the coastal plains Full P, K and 20 % N may be applied as basal along with well decomposed organic manure for early seedling vigour Harvesting excess runoff for its recycling as lifesaving irrigation
B. Mid season drought (1st August to 15st September) Scenario-3: Non-paddy crops in uplands affected
Hoeing and weeding to be completed in non-paddy crop field to provide dust mulch Weeding groundnut 45 DAS disturbs the pegging process. So prunnning the weeds with sickle
Applying post emergence spray of quizalofop ethyl 5% EC @ 0.05 kg/ha in 17
500 l water to control grassy weeds in groundnut/jute Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Spraying 2% KCl + 0.1ppm boron to black gram to overcome drought situation Foliar application of 2% Urea at pre-flowering and flowering stage of green gram is helpful in mitigating drought Spraying 1% urea in brinjal, taking up spray against mealy bugs and mite which are more prevalent in dry weather Top dressing the crop after receipt of rain Removing the borer affected tillers/late formed tillers/dried leaves in sugarcane and following wrapping and propping in chains. Stripping the lower 4-5 leaves Spraying planofix 10 ppm at 45 DAS and 20 ppm 10 days later to prevent boll shading in cotton Spraying 2% urea in late planted jute to encourage growth Topdressing N to ginger and turmeric @ 60 and 30 kg/ha respectively after receipt of rainfall followed by mulching Mulching with organics to extend period of moisture availability Thinning out to the extent of 25% and using removed plants as cattle feed Closing the drainage holes and checking the seepage loss in direct sown medium land rice regularly
Scenario-4: Beushaning of rice delayed
Beushaning may be discouraged in rice, if the crop is more than 45 days old Weeding out the field without waiting for rainfall Gap filling using seedling of same age or clonal tillers to have a uniform distribution of plant Strengthening the field bunds and clog the holes to check seepage loss Withholding N fertilizer application up to receipt of rainfall
Scenario-5: Transplanting of rice delayed / seedlings overaged
Seedlings up to 45 and 60-70 days old can be transplanted in case of medium land and late duration rice vars., respectively without much reduction in yield Removing the weeds and follow plant protection measures against blast in nursery Pulverizing the main rice field in dry conditions, if it is not ploughed earlier to save time in final puddling Using tractor/power tiller/tractor mounted rotavator for speedy land preparation/puddling Closer spacing using 5-7 seedlings/hill Applying 50% recommended N at the time of transplanting Applying life saving irrigation to maintain the nursery seedlings in good health
No top dressing nitrogen in nursery
18
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Scenario-6: Beushaned / transplanted rice affected at early vegetative stage
Provision of protective irrigation Removing the weeds and follow plant protection measures Withholding N fertilizer application up to receipt of rainfall Applying K fertilizers wherever soil moisture allows or wait up to receipt of rainfall Strengthening the field bunds and clog the holes to check seepage loss
C. Late season drought (16th September to 31st October)
Scenario-7: Medium and lowland rice affected at vegetative/ reproductive stage It occurs as a result of early cessation of monsoon rains. The management Practices are : o Provision of protective irrigation tyw o Providing irrigation at critical stages o Crops like cowpea, maize, green gram may be harvested for fodder purpose to avoid their failure as grain crop o When soil becomes hard it is difficult to dig up groundnut from the field, sprinkling water from water harvesting structures o Under situation of complete failure of Kharif crop dismantling it and dibbling the pre-Rabi crop o The ideal pre-Rabi crops for residual moisture are horse gram, castor, niger, black gram and sesame in uplands and well drained medium lands o In waterlogged areas (Pat lands), transplanting older seedlings of 45 to 70 days with 5 to 7 seedlings/hill and applying full P and K at planting. Flood
Various measures adopted for flood mitigation may be categorized into structural and non- structural. The structural measures for flood protection programme are through construction of dams and reservoirs, embankments and floodwalls, sea wall, natural detention basin, channel improvement, drainage improvement and diversion of floodwater. The non-structural measures, on the other hand, aim at modifying the susceptibility to flood damage as well as modifying the loss burden. The approaches for modifying the susceptibility to flood damage are flood plain management, flood proofing including disaster preparedness, and response planning and flood forecasting and warning. Measures for modifying the flood loss burden are through disaster relief and flood fighting. From agricultural loss point of view few contingency measures are recommended to avert the harmful effect of flood occurring in different time.
Pre-flood planning
Suitable variety o Local: Mugudi, Panitarasa, Champeisali, Kanthakamala, Putia, Rabana, Ajana, Bodala, Khuda, Atiranga, Inkada, Bakuri, Chakaakhi, Kalapatri, Barhagati, 19
Kadalagaura Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
o Improved: FR 13 A, FR 43 B Sufficient seed stock for resowing after early flood Varieties for late planting (CR 1014, CR 1018, Jagannath, Mahsuri, Padmini, IR 36, Lalat, Konark) Long duration var. in loland (Sarala, Durga, Varshadhan, Upahar, Hanseswari, Panidhan, Sabita) Direct seeding Dry nursery Contingency nursery Double transplanting/clonal tillers Contingency measures A. Early flood within August Retransplanting rice crop if damage is more than 50% Gap filling with clonal tillers if damage is less than 50% No beushan in direct sown rice crop but weed out the crop and adopt khelua Allowing the plants to stand upright Top dressing N and K to boost growth if situation permits Pest surveillance and management B. Late flood in late August and early September Transplanting 45-60 days old seedlings of medium and late duration rice varieties Adjusting population by using clonal tillers, dapog nursery or community o nursery Sowing of sprouted seeds of relatively short duration varieties on puddle field Applying moderate dose of fertilizer (40-20-20 kg/ha) Pre- rabi and rabi pulses and oilseeds in up-medium lands with fair chance of o recovery of rice crop Regular pest surveillance and management of swarming caterpillar, case worm, o leaf folder, bacterial leaf streak and bacterial leaf blight in post flood situation o of rice crop Management of aphids and bacterial wilt disease of vegetables
Table 3: Flash flood (Short duration)
Strategies Action plan
July flood Seed bank Community nursery Private nursery Sprouted seeding (rice) Short duration var./crops
20 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
August & Sept. flood Older seedlings (Partial damage) Seedlings of short duration var. P- fertilisation Water spray Submergence tolerant rice (Swarna sub-1, OR 1105) Clonal propagation Catch crops/ Pest Control August & Sept. flood Pre rabi crops Ragi, Blackgram, Groundnut, (Complete damage) Mustard, Cucurbits, Barley
Cyclone The four elements of disaster management i.e., prevention, mitigation, preparedness and relief are important for cyclone prone areas. Agricultural management practices for cyclone prone areas include: Establishment of shelter belts Plantation of multipurpose tree species Introduction of saline resistant crops and varieties Emphasis on organic manuring Appropriate planting technique Integrated farming system approach
The projected extent of climate change and its effect on agriculture is a top priority item, which deserves due attention of planners, policy makers, scientists, extension workers and all other interested in development of agriculture. We have to develop and execute both adaptation and mitigation measures to combat the adverse effect of climate change. The farming community needs to be well equipped with the preventive and contingency measures against unprecedented drought, flood and cyclone through adequate awareness and capacity building programmes.
Impact of Climate Change on Domestic Animal Management
In general, three types of "knowledge gap" can be distinguished concerning these impacts. First, there are areas of enquiry in which the impacts of change climate and climate variability are fairly well understood at an aggregated level. But there are major gaps in our knowledge of the localized impacts which seriously inhibits current pro-poor targeting of adaptation options. Second, there are situations in which the impacts are fairly well understood on many of the component processes, but where the impacts at the systems level interact heavily, and our knowledge of them is much less certain. There is much less information, however, concerning how these impacts will interact at the level of the system in specific situations, and how these may affect livestock and the people who depend on them. Third, there are situations in the nature of
the adaptation or mitigation problem is such that many different kinds which the impacts of climate change are relatively well-understood, but of action are needed if poor people are to
benefit. 21 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Impact of climate change on livestock and livestock systems
Factor Impacts
Water Increasing water scarcity is an accelerating condition for 1-2 billion people. Coupled with population growth and economic development, climate change impacts will have a substantial effect on global water availability in the future.
Feeds Land use and systems change
As climate changes and becomes more variable, species niches change (plant and crop substitution). May modify animal diets and compromise the ability of smallholders to manage feed deficits. For example: in parts of East Africa, maize being substituted by crops more suited to drier environments (sorghum, millet); in marginal arid southern Africa, systems converting from a mixed crop-livestock to rangeland-based.
Changes in the primary productivity of crops, forages and rangeland
Effects depend significantly on location, system, species . But in C4 species, temperature increases up to 30-35 °C may increase productivity of crops, fodders and pastures (as long as water and nutrients do not significantly limit plant growth). In C3 plants, temperature has a similar effect but increases in CO2 levels will have a positive impact on the productivity of these crops. For food-feed crops, harvest indices will change and so will the quantity of stover and availability of metabolisable energy for dry season feeding. In the semi-arid rangelands where contractions in the growing season are likely, rangeland productivity will decrease
Changes in species composition
As temperature and CO2 levels change, optimal growth ranges for different species also change, species alter their competition dynamics, and the composition of mixed grasslands changes. Proportion of browse in rangelands will increase in the future as a result of increased growth and competition of browse species due to increased CO2 levels (Morgan et al., 2007). Legume species will also benefit from increases in CO2 and in tropical grasslands, the mix between legumes and grasses could be altered.
Quality of plant material
Increased temperature increases lignification of plant tissues and thus
reduces the digestibility and the rates of degradation of plant species. Resultant reduction in livestock production may have impacts on food
security and income of smallholders. Interaction between primary 22 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
productivity and quality of grasslands will demand modification in grazing systems management to attain production objectives. Biodiversity will be disturbed and there will be loss of genetic and cultural diversity in agriculture already occurring as a result of globalisation (Ehrenfeld, 2005).A 2.5 °C increase in global temperature above pre-industrial levels will see major losses: 20-30% of all plant and animal species assessed could be at high risk of extinction (IPCC, 2007). Ecosystems and species show a wide range of vulnerabilities to climate change, depending on the imminence of exposure to ecosystem-specific, critical thresholds, but assessments are fraught with uncertainty related to CO2 fertilisation effects etc.
Livestock and Major impacts on vector-borne diseases: expansion of vector populations human health into cooler areas (higher altitude areas, such as malaria and livestock tick- borne diseases) or into more temperate zones(such as bluetongue disease in northern Europe).Changes in rainfall pattern may also influence expansion of vectors during wetter years, leading to large outbreaks of disease (Rift Valley Fever virus in East Africa). Helminth infections are greatly influenced by changes in temperature and humidity. Climate change may affect trypanotolerance in sub-humid zones of West Africa: could lead to loss of this adaptive trait that has developed over millennia and greater disease risk in the future. Effects (via changes in crop, livestock practices) on distribution and impact of malaria in many systems and schistosomiasis and lymphatic filariasis in irrigated systems (Patz et al., 2005).Increases in heat related mortality and morbidity (Patz et al., 2005)Climate variability impacts on food production and nutrition can enhance susceptibility to diseases (Williams, 2004).
Many possible adaptation options exist, from technological changes to increase or maintain productivity, through learning, policies and investment in specific sectors and risk reduction options, which may increase the adaptive capacity of poor livestock farmers. Given this range of options, there is a real need for methods and tools to assess what may be appropriate where. This includes the collation of toolboxes of adaptation options and the identification of the domains where these may be relevant, at broad scales through the use of spatial analysis, and at more localized scales through more participatory, community based approaches. This work should revolve around the development of collaborative learning processes to support the adaptation of livestock systems to better cope up with the impacts of climate change. Farmers already have a wealth of indigenous knowledge on how to deal with climate variability and risk, but well- targeted capacity building efforts are needed to help farmers deal with changes in their systems that go beyond what they have experienced in the past
Climate Change and Gender Issues Though the impact of climate change seems to be gender neutral but it has many hidden areas 23
which affects women adversely as compared to men. When incorporated in analyses of climate Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
change, the gender approach promotes understanding of how the identities of women and men determine different vulnerabilities and capacities to deal with climate change.
Climate change and gender inequality The impact of climate change will be differently distributed among different regions, generations, ages, classes, income groups, occupations and sexes. Women, due to their social roles, discrimination and poverty, are affected differently by the effects of climate change and by extreme climate events that often translate into disasters. Women are not involved in decision making process on climate change, adaptation and mitigation strategies. Women bear a disproportionate burden of climate change consequences such as:
Decreased food security: With changes in climate, traditional food sources become more unpredictable and scarce. This exposes women to loss of access to food materials. Impact on livelihoods: Women are more dependent for their livelihood on natural resources that are threatened by climate change. For instance, climate change causes a rise in the sea level, affecting the fishing community (both men and women) not only in terms of fish catch but also with regard to water scarcity, as seawater gets into fresh water sources. Besides, when the land is inundated, infrastructure (roads and houses) are damaged. Large scale migration from inundated areas is expected and much of the burden of migration falls on women. Water resources shortage and access: Climate change may exacerbate existing shortages of water. Women are largely responsible for water collection in their communities and are therefore more affected when the quantity of water and/or its accessibility changes.
Increased burden of home making: As primary home makers, women may see their responsibilities increase as family members suffer increased illness due to exposure to vector borne diseases such as malaria, water borne diseases such as cholera and increase in heart stress mortality.
What women can do? Development and environment conservation strategies to deal with climate change have been suggested for adaptation to extreme climate events and mitigation of the causes of climate change. Adaptation strategies will be more effective if made with a participatory decision-making process. It is recognized that the actions that women can take depend on their involvement in decision making processes at all levels, their capacity to effectively intervene in climate change matters, their integration into climate change institutions, and to be engaged in policy and decision making processes at all levels. It is also recognized that the actions that women can take depend on the strength of their networking, particularly with gender and women climate change organizations. Women and gender experts should ensure that they are well informed about the gendered dimensions of climate sensitive sectors, particularly the existing inequalities between men and women and how climate change can exacerbate these inequalities.
In this regard, the empowerment of women in all aspects, including their access to appropriate
information, skills and adequate resources, to enable them to act in a timely manner, is seen as 24
key. Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Women often suffer most from climate change impacts since they have less access to resources and services, victims of gendered division of labour, less liberty of migration, low visibility and less decision making power, inadequate attention for their health etc. Under such situations it is felt that there is a need for:
Full acknowledgement of the contribution of women to the use and management of natural resources. Guaranteed women’s rights in climate change mitigation and adaptation, including their rights to information, knowledge, skills, resources and participation in decision-making. Women’s full participation and contribution to decision-making and leadership on climate change processes and actions, including adaptation and mitigation actions. Increasing awareness and understanding on adaptation issues and concerns at the global, national, and most importantly, at the local levels, among the poor and vulnerable. Provision of timely information and adequate services and resources to women and vulnerable communities to enable them make timely decisions and take appropriate actions, including taking effective adaptation measures
Building on and strengthening women’s experiences, knowledge and coping capacities in adaptation policies, and ensuring that women’s needs are considered in livelihood adaptation strategies. This should include the provision of training to women’s organizations, networks and support groups, as well as opportunities to share experiences. The use of gender analysis to understand the different roles and responsibilities of women and men in natural resource use and management, in order to make interventions equally relevant for women and men. The empowerment of women to enable them acquire, invest in and deploy technologies that contribute to mitigation and adaptation to climate change, as well as to enable them to effectively mobilize for action. Equal access, control and distribution of benefits
Suggested agricultural measures for farm women A range of adaptation measures are avai1able to reduce vulnerability to climate change by enhancing adaptive capacity and increasing resilience. Some of such suggested measures are as follows. Growing non paddy crops in rain fed uplands to perform better under prolonged soil moisture stress in Kharif. New rice cultivation techniques such as SRI method of rice cultivation during summer and in well drained medium lands during Kharif under assured water supply. Going for transplanting of rice instead of dry method of direct sowing for more assured yield.
Frequent but shallow irrigation, drip and sprinkler irrigation for high value crops and
irrigation at critical stages. 25
Integrated pest management to contain the pests below the economic injury level. Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Preventive measures that include on farm reservoirs in medium lands, growing of pulses and oi1seeds instead of rice in uplands, ridges and furrow system in cotton, growing of intercrops in place of pure crops in uplands. Recommended contingent measures for drought and flood are to be ready in stock for adoption depending on emerging scenario of drought, time of occurrence and land situation.
Strategies for reducing gender discrimination in the context of climate change
It is clear that gender differences must be taken into account to understand the impact of climate change. Gender differentiated strategies for responses and capacity building are needed, due to differences in gender specific roles and responsibilities created by society. The decision makers should have a better understanding of how different groups of people are affected and what kind of capacity and support is needed. Some such recommended actions are:
Government and NGOs should analyze and identify gender specific impacts and protection measures related to floods, droughts, diseases, and other environmental changes and disasters.
Government and NGOs should develop strategies to enhance women’s access to and control over natural resources, in order to reduce poverty, protect environmental resources, and ensure that women and poor communities can better cope with climate change. There is a need to promote women’s equal access to land ownership and other resources required for socio-economic participation.
Given that women’s knowledge and participation has been critical to the survival of entire communities in disaster situations, government and NGOs should take cognizance of women’s specialized skills in different aspects of their livelihood and natural resource management strategies and utilize those that lend themselves to mitigation and adaptation.
Planning must be made by using appropriate tools and procedures to augment the capacity of women for equal participation in decision making process related to climate change issues.
Recognizing the importance of domestic work and the knowledge it brings to the matter concerning climate change, and to promote men’s participation in this sphere.
Training both women and men in methods for increasing their productivity with new technologies in a changing climate.
26 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Coping Strategy Coping with the impact of climate change on agriculture will require careful management of resources like soil, water and biodiversity. Making agriculture sustainable is key and is possible only through production systems that make the most efficient use of environmental goods and services without damaging these assets. If climate change impacts can be incorporated in the design and implementation of development programs right away, it will help to reduce vulnerability, stabilize food production and better secure livelihoods. To cope with the impact of climate change on agriculture and food production India will need to act at global, regional, national and local levels.
Mitigating emissions from agriculture will reduce input costs for the farmer and make the production system more sustainable. The real challenge to the agricultural future of the country however will have to be met by rapid and targeted adaptation strategies. Adaptation will require strategies to reduce vulnerabilities, strengthen resilience & build the adaptive capacity of rural and farming communities. Industrial agro ecosystems damage environmental goods and services and so have weak resilience.
Developing sustainability in agriculture production systems rather than seeking to maximize crop, aquaculture and livestock outputs, will help farming communities to cope with the uncertainties of climate change. The ecosystem approach with crop rotations, bioorganic fertilizers and biological pest controls, improves soil health & water retention, increases fertile top soil, reduces soil erosion and maintains productivity over the long term. The more diverse the agro ecosystems, the more efficient the network of insects & and microorganisms that control pests and disease. Building resilience in agro ecosystems and farming communities, improving adaptive capacity and mitigating GHG emissions is the way to cope.
Agriculture biodiversity is central to an agro ecosystem approach to food production. Such an approach promotes soil fertility, fosters high productivity and protects crop, livestock, fish and soil resources. Diversity in livestock and fish species and breeds is as important as in crop varieties. Genetic diversity gives species the ability to adapt to changing environments and combat biotic and abiotic stress like pests and disease, drought and salinity. Apart from the obvious focus needed on soil health, water management and conservation and pest management, agriculture and food production per se, will need to become sustainable and ecologically sound to adapt to climate change turbulence.
A special package for adaptation should be developed for rain fed areas based on minimizing risk. The production model should be diversified to include crops, livestock, fisheries, poultry and agro forestry; homestead gardens supported by nurseries should be promoted to make up deficits in food and nutrition from climate related yield losses. Farm ponds, fertilizer trees and biogas plants must be promoted in all semi-arid rain fed areas which constitute 60 percent of our cultivated area. A knowledge-intensive, rather than input-intensive approach should be adopted to develop adaptation strategies. Traditional knowledge about the community’s coping strategies
should be documented and used in training programs to help find solutions to address the 27
uncertainties of climate change, build resilience, adapt agriculture and reduce emissions. Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Conserving the genetic diversity of crops and animal breeds and its associated knowledge, in partnership with local communities must receive the highest priority. Breed improvement of indigenous cattle must be undertaken to improve their performance since they are much better adapted to adverse weather than high performance hybrids. Balancing feed mixtures, which research shows has the potential to increase milk yield and reduce methane emission, must be promoted widely. An early warning system should be put in place to monitor changes in pest and disease profile and predict new pest and disease outbreaks. The overall pest control strategy should be based on Integrated Pest Management because it takes care of multiple pests in a given climatic scenario.
Agriculture Sl. No. Issues/ Concerns Strategies Action Plan
1 Early onset & Re-sowing of Seed bank in every village on sudden stoppage traditional crops by community basis. of monsoon keeping sufficient seeds Seed bank at individual level Informal seed production with barter distribution system Pre rabi crops Early sowing of niger/ragi
Crop diversification Growing of non paddy crops
Dry land horticultural Off season vegetables, yam, sweet potato,Jack fruit jammu, papaya, cashew nut, pineapple
Agroforestry Bund tree plantation(karanj, acasia, subabool
Sericultute Location specific sericulture is encouraged with Arjuna & Asana tree
Rain water management Staggered trench with plantation Gully plugging Loose boulder structure 30’-40’ model Percolation tank Vegetative measures 2 Late onset of Sow non paddy & low Ragi, cow pea, green gram, monsoon horsegram, castor, sesame & other water requiring crops crops suitable for the area
Varietal replacement & Drought resistant crops & varieties mixed cropping
28 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
3 Beusaning Weeding & Weed out the field & maintain the delayed maintenance of plant plant population by population khelua/thinning.
4 Delayed Maintenance of plant Closer spacing with older transplanting population seedlings/more seedlings/hill
5 Late season Protective irrigation Water harvesting structure, water drought distribution /field channel for irrigation
6 Pest problem Termite & mealy bug Neem oil cake application control Neem seed kernel extract (NSKE)application Pre collection & supply of neem seeds through SHGs 7 Early flood Varietal replacement & Flood tolerant variety within august quick preparation of (Swarna sub-1) nursery Sufficient seed availability Community nursery Sowing of sprouted seeds 8 Sand casting Gully control Gully plugging (LBS, brush wood, check dam) Suitable crops Cucurbits, ground nut, black grams 9 Pest problem Surveillance & control Application of of biopesticides swarming caterpillar Case worm Biopesticides
10 Temperature Micro environment Agro forestry ( promotion stress management of thermo-insensitive crops & varieties, early planting, short duration crops) Proper water management (frequent irrigation) Mulching (locally available material) Application of sufficient organic matter Awareness & capacity Awareness building on
building Forest Related Acts 29
through group discussion Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Livestock
The production potential of high producing animals is likely to be adversely affected due to low agricultural production and high prices of grains due to climate change. In view of this, the breeding policy of the State needs to be addressed to meet the probable problems that may arise due to climate change. The adverse effect may be reduced to great extent through introduction of resistant breeds of livestock, even compromising with the productivity of the breed or type. The management of existing physical structures and creating other physical facilities to reduce exposure of the animals to surface air temperature will be a possible strategy to meet this exigency also. The different concerns and their respective strategies and action plans have been presented in the following Table 6A & Table 6B.
General effects of climate change on livestock performance
Sl.No. Issues/ Concerns Strategies Action Plan
1 Low agriculture Use of unconventional feed Supplementation of production results in low ingredients feeds and/or minerals feed-grain availability and Fodder cultivation at subsidised cost consequence rise in price Use of balance diet so as to minimize wastage of feed 2 Deterioration of pasture Research on delignification of Supplementation of quality will be there due to fibrous feeds and balanced diet and use shortage of water and supplementation of high energy of ureated straw warmer climate diet
3 Alteration of temperature Breeding of resistance breeds Strictly following and humidity may increase Contol measures to vaccination schedule no. of parasites, resulting reduce parasitic Consistent in increased incidence of infestation deworming of diseases which in turn Feeding balance feed animals results in low productivity, increased morbidity and mortality
4 Heat stress results from the Physical modification of the Supply of cold water animals inhability to environment during ambient high dissipate heat to maintain rise of temperature homeo-thermy. Heat stress is seen when temperature
humidity index is more
than 72. This results in
hormonal imbalance. 30
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Impact of Climate change on individual species i) Cattle & buffalo
Sl.No. Issues/ Concerns Strategies Action Plan
1 Maintained mostly for draft Awareness campaign Vocational training purpose for better draft-ability of farmers and supply of bullock driven carriages and improved agricultural implements.
2 Production oriented cattle Supplementation of Supplementation (crossbred) are being introduced feed through utilizing of balanced feed in the farming system different combination and/or mineral of fodder and mixture to Crossbred unconventional feed animals Health support Development of need to be fodder units Free strengthened vaccination schedule, de- worming at least twice in a year to all the large animals of not only in project area, but also adjacent to the target area
(ii) Small Ruminants (Goat & Sheep) Sl.No. Issues/ Concerns Strategies Action Plan
1 Low growth, Feed supplementation Supplementation of mineral productivity mixture to all the small ruminants, in and around the target area
2 Morbidity and mortality Strengthening health Free vaccination schedule, de- increases due to climate support worming at least thrice in a year change Safe drinking Awareness building on benefit of water safe drinking water
31
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
(iii) Poultry Birds Sl.No. Issues/ Concerns Strategies Action Plan
1 Inadequate availability & Development of Introduce dual purpose birds high cost of feed materials breeds for semi (Banaraja) Duckery may be intensive of introduced where ever feasible management system
2 Commercial broiler birds Microenvironment Avoid high temperature by prone to heat stroke management way of proper cooling& Appropriate feed ventilation management Appropriate feeding materials Upgradation of indigenous birds may be tried with introduction of RIR males Organise vocational training and field demonstrations Gender
Sl.No. Issues/ Concerns Strategies Action Plan
1 Adverse effect on women Adoption of new Identification of suitable& health & nutrition and appropriate technology women-friendly efficient increased burden due to & diversified technology low yield in production agricultural pattern. relating to farming system Creation of system. Livelihood option with Skill building of marketing support and community member support services. (male & female) on new Involvement of technology proposed. women in selection of Provision of integrated crop varieties. demonstration on the proposed technology. Exposure to different sites 2 Depletion of forest .Mobilization for use Supply of smoke less of low/alternative fuel chullah, biogas enhances drudgery of consumption. plants, solar cookers etc women and will have Participation of .Introduce mini hydro women in PFM/JFM electricity Access to “CRP” for programme, where possible
farm forestry. Incentives & training on
alternate energy and
energy plantation 32
Training of women/WSHGs Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
on raising nursery and plantations .Introduction of agro – forestry and WADI model in OTELP area
3 Scarcity of water Conservation & Construction of farm enhances women’s harvesting of rain pond /Percolation tank. drudgery & affects water. Gravity water utilization women’s health and take Provision of safe after filtration. the children out of school drinking water. Awareness or capacity to supplement mother’s building for use of safe work for fetching water drinking/ boiled water Training for maintenance of tube-well and bore wells Sanitation around wells /tube wells 4 Migration due to natural Government /NGO’s Implement of schemes calamity led to social intervention for seeking for massive job insecurity. alternative jobs. opportunity. .Adaptation to climate Food safety net at the & reduce the impact of time of scarcity. natural calamities. • Contingent planning for Preparedness to the Disaster mitigate disaster. Management. Intensification of household live stock system. Supply of key inputs for alternative cropping. 5 Women are least exposed • Empowerment of SHG formation and to information system on women to gain access their capacity building. climate change to information system. Provision of formal and • Increasing the literacy informal education. rate. Establishment of village • Ensuring women knowledge centre. participation in Introduction of gender information budgeting. dissemination system.
6 Less participation in • Empowerment of Introduction of cadre
decision making on women through building process. adoption /mitigation ensuring participation Provision of incentives for 33
strategy due to increased better performing group. Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
workload. in decision making Training on legal literacy and leadership development. Strengthening the local government system. 7 Illegal exploitation of • Preservation of natural Formation of groups and resources their capacity building protected areas due to • Arrangement for Allotment of CPRs to environmental alternate resources the WSHGs for dry land degradation where horticulture and farm women obtain their forestry resources
Monitoring Framework: Monitoring is the systematic collection and analysis of information as a project progresses. It is aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of a project. Monitoring involves: Establishing indicators of efficiency, effectiveness and impact; Setting up systems to collect information relating to these indicators; Collecting and recording the information; Analysing the information; Using the information to inform day-to-day management (PIA). Monitoring is an internal function of the project:
I. Self-evaluation: This involves a PFA holding up a mirror to itself and assessing how it is doing, as a way of learning and improving practice. It takes a very self-reflective and honest organisation to do this effectively, but it can be an important learning experience.
II. Participatory evaluation: This is a form of internal evaluation. The intention is to involve as many people with a direct stake in the work as possible. This may mean project staff and beneficiaries working together on the evaluation. If an outsider is called in, it is to act as a facilitator of the process, not an evaluator. III. Rapid Participatory Appraisal: Originally used in rural areas, the same methodology can, in fact, be applied in most communities. This is a qualitative way of doing evaluations. It is semi- structured and carried out by an interdisciplinary team over a short time. It is used as a starting point for understanding a local situation and is a quick, cheap, useful way to gather information. It involves the use of secondary data review, direct observation, semi-structured interviews, key informants, group interviews, games, diagrams, maps and calendars. In an evaluation context, it allows one to get valuable input from those who are supposed to be benefiting from the development work. It is flexible and interactive
IV. External evaluation: This is an evaluation done by a carefully chosen outsider or outsider team.
34 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
V. Interactive evaluation: This involves a very active interaction between an outside evaluator or evaluation team and the organization or project being evaluated. Sometimes an insider may be included in the evaluation team . Convergence: Convergence is an evolving process the actual contours of convergence will be determined by the resources at the Central, State, District and the project level to implement the climate specific interventions in the project. Also, to fully identify the possibilities of convergence, it may be necessary to make a beginning with select programmes, so that the experience of implementation may further inform and refine strategies for convergence.
Comprehensive treatment- Natural Resources Management (NRM) works Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act(MGNREGA),Rural Development(RD) - for land treatment especially earthworks such as farm and contour bunds, clearing drainage lines, preparing pits for plantation Repair, Rennovation & Restoration(RR&R), Water Resources (WR) - restore and augment storage capacities of water bodies Forest Department (FD) Programme - treatment of ridge areas in the upper reaches - especially in the Reserve Forest areas, afforestation through the Green India Mission in common lands, farm bunds, etc. These broadly align with the objectives addressed through the NRM works component of project.
Programmes/lnitiatives that can benefitfrom potential created (indicative) Rural Drinking Water Supply (RD) - Improved water availability from water conservation measures
Agriculture - Different Programmes including National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture(NMSA), National Food Security Mission(NFSM), National Horticulture Mission(NHM), Rashtriya
Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY) etc. - Improved productivity potential through assured water availability, also addresses climate change concerns from more frequent droughts, reduction in soil degradation due to erosion.
Animal Husbandry - Improved fodder availability through treatment of commons, agricultural residues and third fodder crop. Self Help Group (SHGs) and SHG federations can take up dairying as in Income generating option.
Fisheries-Perennial water bodies created in the project ensure fisheries as a livelihood option. National Rural Livelihood Mission (NRLM) - SHGs are already created as an integral part of the project Credit Support - Better outlook for loan repayments as farmers are less susceptible to weather fluctuations and women's SHGs have reached a certain level of maturity Public Private Partnership (PPP) - assured farm produce provides an impetus for Iue addition and
marketing. Farmer's groups and Commodity Interest Groups (CIGs) already formed. 35
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
PFA and team would facilitate the implementation of important programmes through convergence of other Departments such as MGNREGA, Backward Region Grant Fund (BRGF), NFSM, NHM, Tribal Welfare Schemes, Artificial Ground Water Recharge, Green India etc. in the watershed areas on priority in collaboration with their field functionaries.
The Departments that are potential convergence in the project include: Rural Development, Panchayati Raj, Water Resources, Minor Irrigation, Ground Water, Drinking Water Supply & Sanitation, Agriculture, Horticulture, Animal Husbandry, Dairy, Fisheries, Agriculture Engineering, Soil and Water Conservation, Environment & Forest, Sericulture, Marketing, Cooperation, Social Welfare, Tribal Development, Adult Education etc. Training, research, extension and other facilitating institutions/ organizations that could be considered to promote convergence would include: State Administrative Training Institutes, State Agricultural! Horticultural / Veterinary Universities, State Marketing Boards, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) institutes, State Agricultural Management and Training Institute(SAMETls), Forestry Research and Training Centres, Watershed Training Institutes/Centres, Water & Land Management Institutes(WALMls), Irrigation Management Training Institutes, National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD), State Institutes of Rural Development(SIRDs), State level Co-operative Training Institutes, State Remote Sensing Agencies, Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs), Farmers Training Centres (FTCs),Training Centres of IFFCO, KRIBHCO, Training Institutes of Banks, etc.
A number of mechanisms are already available through various programmes and schemes to facilitate convergence. Some of these are: (i) Comprehensive District Agriculture Plans (C- DAPs)& State Agriculture Plans (SAPS)of RKVY,(ii) Strategic Research and Extension Plans (SREPs)and Block Action Plans (BAPs) of Agricultural Technology Management Agencies (ATMAs) of State Agriculture Departments, (iii) Micro Level Farming Situation Analysis Reports of KVKs, (iv) Detailed Project Reports of IWMP and (v) Work Plans of Forest Departments. Also, the State Perspective Plans identify specific areas for convergence of project with the line department programmes. There should be a clear focus on capture of priorities to strategize and facilitate convergence process.
Conclusion:
Climate Change is new concept to the community so there is a need for many more studies and also intervention to help people to cope with changing weather there is need to take them for sustenance living. Thus, it can be concluded that the community has superficial information about the causes of Climate Change and they also lack scientific information about the same. They are aware about the causes of seasonal variations. At the same time, they are not able to connect these causes to Climate Change. Hence, there is need to build awareness about Climate Change. Hence the project is ensuring to incorporate the coping strategies to combat the climate hazards in the watershed so as to reduce vulnerability in a long term basis.
36 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
ANNEX 3 - FORMAT FOR DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1. Summary of Proposed Investment: CCA measures Area proposed to be treated with CCA measures (ha.): 682 No. of Average Source of Funds (Rs. lakh) No. of Average Re- Total Ref cost of Particulars New cost of designed cost (Rs. Community*(minim . redesign NABA Other Units new unit existing lakh) um16%unskilled Total ed units RD sources units labour) CCA Analysis and Planning 1 –Preparation of DPR 0 0 1 1.25 1.25 1.25 0 0 1.25 Additional Soil and Water 2 Conservation Measures (ha.) 0 0 11 1.318 14.5 12.5 2 1.94 16.44 3 Soil improvement and productivity enhancement measures (ha.) 0 0 7 1.20 8.42 7.5 0.92 0.5 8.92 4 Sustainable farming practices (ha.) including NRM and CCA livelihood and food security activities. 0 0 10 1.262 12.62 10.51 2.11 1.353 13.973 5 Measures to mitigate CC risks 6 0.5 0 0 0 2.5 0.5 0 3.0 Capacity building and 6 institutional strengthening 13 0.192 0 0 0 2.5 0 0 2.5 7 WS level knowledge mgt. 1 1.25 0 0 0 1.25 0 0 1.25 8 Management cost 0 0 1 12 12 12 0 0 12 Total 17.033 48.79 50.01 5.53 3.793 59.333
37
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
2. Assessment of Vulnerability to Climate Change and Investment Options 2.1 Sector-wise Vulnerability Analysis and selection of investments (refer Annex 4- stakeholder consultation report) Critical climate Current and future impact (Sensitivity) on the Current response Suggested response to hazards vulnerable community climate hazards critical climate Investment Sector (Exposure)* (adaptive hazards options in Indirect Non-climatic capacity) Direct Impact Impact stress order of Irrigation Use of drought Diverse cropping priority** a. Drought Water scarcity Rain Water harvesting Drinking water resistance variety pattern b. Excessive Soil erosion & crop Low Watershed dev.work Agriculture rainfall loss production c. Late monsoon Less production Pest attack Adopt IPM tech. d. pests and Less Crop Damage Use resistant variety diseases production Water Flash flood Soil loss, Crop Scarcity of Creat Insitu measures Damage feed Forests a. Land slide Land Damage Crop loss D/W measures b. Cyclone Crop Damage Less harvest Regular monitoring Soil a. Heavy rainfall Soil erosion & crop Low Regular loss productivity monitoring.V.R b. High wind Crop failure Fincial loss Regular monitoring speed Animal High temperature Livestock loss Fincial los Regular Husbandry monitoring,Vaccination Livelihood/ a.Drought Scarcity of feed Fincial loss Regular monitoring poverty/food security
*Climate events may include drought, intermittent dry spells, excessive rainfall, high wind speed, temperature extremes, late or early onset of monsoons etc. If more than one climate events are relevant to any sector additional rows may be added
**The selection of investments will be made based on PRA and community consultative process as well as based on the analysis done in consultation with 38
local scientific institutions / agency/ experts. Indicative list of investments is given in section 8 of explanatory note. Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
3. Baseline and Projected targets with CCA measures 3.1 Land use pattern
Pre- Post WS (Business as Usual) as Projection under Particulars Unit WS per Project Completion report CCA scenario Total geographical area Ha 704.18 704.18 704.18 Waterlogged area Ha - - - Land under misc. tree crops and grooves Ha - - - Culturable wastelands Ha 13.09 9 2 Fallow land other than current fallows Ha 272.49 194.6 102.4 Current fallows Ha 41.46 37.46 30.46 Net sown areas Ha 313.92 - - Gross irrigated area Ha 33.15 74.61 105.45 Net irrigated area Ha 23.5 45.05 88.9 Area under horticulture crops (trees) – dry Ha 18 25 60.5 land horticulture Ha - - - Area under irrigated horticulture Ha - - -
AREA GIVEN IN THE WATERSHED DPR TO BE REVISED AS PER THE TABLE . CAN BE COLLECTED FROM REVENUE INSIPECTOR OFFICE.
39
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
4. Soil and Water Conservation Meaures
4.1 . Cost of S&WC Measures GAT No.WISE NET PLANNING (SOIL & MOISTURE CONSERVATION MEASURES) Existing Treatment Proposed Treatment To tal Dep Cost Co Are th Er Propos Additi No Total Present Cost of st Sl. Gat a Slo of Tex odi Cla ed onal .of Treatm Unit Cost Village Land Le per Earth of Remarks No. No. (ha. pe Soil ture bili ss Land Len Sect Volu Typ Sect Volu Earth Pla ent Cost (Rs./Ha.) use Type ng Unit work Pla ) (cm ty use gth ion me e ion me work nts (Rs.) th (Rs.) nt ) ati on [21]=[ [1 [22 [2 [24]=[2 [25]=[24/ [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [17] [18] [19] [20] 19x20 [26] 6] ] 3] 1+23] 3] ] PRIVATE CULTIVABLE LAND 1.4 0.5 0.5 126.9 40 1 Taupadar 1 7 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 235 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 0.5 0.5 186.3 40 2 Taupadar 8 6 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 345 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MS 1500 MSO - O 4 6000 1.3 0.5 195.4 0.5 40 3 Taupadar 9 1 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 362 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0.5 0.5 170.1 40 4 Taupadar 10 7 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 315 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.8 0.5 0.5 194.4 40 5 Taupadar 11 0 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 360 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vermi 10000.0 compo VC 10000 0 st unit - U 0.5 113. 113.9 4557. 1.6 30 - NF 21 40 6 Taupadar 12 1 B D4 SiCL e1 II VR NFB VR 1 B 1 4 94 4 60 0 0 4557.60 2835.585 0.5 3888. 1.0 30 - NF 18 40 7 Taupadar 13 6 B D4 SiCL e1 II VR NFB VR 1 B 0 4 97.2 97.2 00 0 0 3888.00 3679.448 0.5 73.4 2937. 1.8 30 - NF 13 40 8 Taupadar 15 7 B D4 SiCL e1 II VR NFB VR 1 B 6 4 4 73.44 60 0 0 2937.60 1567.143 Dugw ell with 15000 ------150000 lifting DW 0
device LD
0.8 NF 15 0.5 83.1 3326. 30 - 40 9 Taupadar 16 8 B D4 SiCL e1 II VR NFB VR 1 B 4 4 6 83.16 4 0 0 3326.40 3768.903
1.2 NF 16 0.5 87.4 3499. 40 30 - 40
10 Taupadar 17 1 B D4 SiCL e1 II VR NFB VR 1 B 2 4 8 87.48 2 0 0 3499.20 2881.008 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Far m 40x RF 40x RFP - 1 15000 0 0 15000 - Farm Pon 40 P 40 11 Taupadar 17 Pond d 1 - - - 0.7 0.5 150.1 0.5 40 12 Taupadar 18 3 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 278 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.7 0.6 0.6 176.8 150 13 Taupadar 19 2 B D4 SiCL e1 II SB - SB 272 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 0.6 0.6 153.4 150 14 Taupadar 20 7 B D4 SiCL e1 II SB - SB 236 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vermi 10000.0 compo VC 10000 0 st unit U 1.8 0.5 181.4 0.5 40 15 Taupadar 21 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 336 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0.5 154.4 0.5 40 16 Taupadar 22 3 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 286 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.5 0.5 84.24 40 17 Taupadar 23 4 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 156 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0.5 165.2 0.5 40 18 Taupadar 24 1 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 306 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0.6 0.6 II 87.1 150 19 Taupadar 25 4 B D4 SiCL e1 SB - SB 134 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 0.5 192.7 0.5 II 40 20 Taupadar 26 1 B D4 SiCL e1 FB - FB 357 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MS - 1500 MSO O 4 0 0 6000 1.3 0.5 0.5 170.1 40 21 Taupadar 27 1 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 315 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Far m 40x RF 40x RFP 1 - 1 - - 15000 - 0 0 15000 - 1.8 Farm Pon 40 P 40 22 Taupadar 28 9 B D4 SiCL e1 II Pond d Far m ------Farm Pon 40x 23 Taupadar 28 Pond - d 1 40 - 0.7 0.5 0.5 153.9 40 24 Taupadar 29 3 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 285 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 116.6 0.5 40 25 Taupadar 30 9 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 216 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 0.6 0.6 92.3 150 26 Taupadar 31 6 C D3 L e2 III SB - SB 142 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0.6 212.5 0.6 40 27 Taupadar 32 6 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 327 5 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MS
1500 MSO O 3 4500 0.9 0.5 0.5 137.7 40
28 Taupadar 33 9 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 255 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0.6 0.5 100.9 0.5 40
29 Taupadar 34 2 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 187 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
1.1 0.5 114.4 0.5 40 30 Taupadar 35 9 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 212 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0.5 146.8 0.5 40 31 Taupadar 36 7 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 272 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 0.6 0.6 143 150 32 Taupadar 37 2 B D4 SiCL e1 II SB - SB 220 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Na Nadep 1 0 10000 10000 dep 0.6 0.5 117.7 0.5 40 33 Taupadar 38 2 A D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 218 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0.5 155.5 0.5 40 34 Taupadar 39 9 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 288 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0.5 131.7 0.5 40 35 Taupadar 40 9 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 244 4 6 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0.5 127.9 0.5 40 36 Taupadar 41 7 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 237 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co mp 2 12000 24000 Comp ost ost Pit Pit 0.5 0.5 0.5 113.4 40 37 Taupadar 42 7 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 210 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 0.6 0.6 156 150 38 Taupadar 43 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II SB - SB 240 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MS 1500 MSO O 4 6000 0.5 0.5 0.5 90.72 40 39 Taupadar 44 1 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 168 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0.5 0.5 145.8 40 40 Taupadar 45 7 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 270 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0.5 137.1 0.5 40 41 Taupadar 46 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 254 4 6 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.2 0.5 165.2 0.5 FB FB 40 42 Taupadar 49 8 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 306 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Far Farm m ------Pond Pon 40x 43 Taupadar 49 d 1 40 - 0.2 0.5 0.5 FB - FB 94.5 40 44 Taupadar 51 8 B D4 SiCL e1 II 175 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.6 0.6 SB SB 94.25 150 45 Taupadar 53 9 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 145 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 0.6 0.6 SB SB 72.8 150 46 Taupadar 55 7 C D3 L e2 III - 112 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.4 0.5 173.8 0.5 FB FB 40 47 Taupadar 56 7 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 322 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MS 1500 MSO O 3 4500
0.4 0.6 0.6 42 SB SB 49.4 150 48 Taupadar 58 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 76 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
49 Taupadar 60 0.2 B D4 SiCL e1 II SB - SB 80 0.6 52 - 0 0.6 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 0 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
9 5 5 0.8 0.6 0.6 SB SB 81.25 150 50 Taupadar 61 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 125 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0.5 0.5 81 40 51 Taupadar 64 6 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 150 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.6 0.6 SB SB 68.25 150 52 Taupadar 65 7 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 105 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3 0.6 0.6 SB SB 36.4 150 53 Taupadar 66 0 C D3 L e2 III - 56 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co mp 3 12000 36000 Comp ost ost Pit Pit 0.8 0.6 0.6 SB SB 88.4 150 54 Taupadar 69 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 136 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.4 0.6 0.6 SB SB 117 150 55 Taupadar 73 8 C D3 L e2 III - 180 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dugw ell with 15000 ------150000 lifting DW 0 device LD 0.3 0.5 0.5 FB FB 96.12 40 56 Taupadar 74 6 C D3 L e2 III - 178 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.5 138.2 0.5 II FB - FB 40 57 Taupadar 78 9 B D4 SiCL e1 256 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.5 0.5 FB - FB 81 40 58 Taupadar 80 1 B D4 SiCL e1 II 150 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 FB FB 143.1 40 59 Taupadar 81 1 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 265 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0.5 0.5 FB FB 105.3 40 60 Taupadar 83 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 195 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.7 0.6 100.7 0.6 SB SB 150 61 Taupadar 85 9 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 155 5 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Na Nadep 10000 dep 1 0 10000 0.4 0.5 131.2 0.5 FB FB 40 62 Taupadar 87 9 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 243 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.6 0.6 SB SB 79.3 150 63 Taupadar 123 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 122 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0.6 111.1 0.6 SB SB 150 64 Taupadar 139 0 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 171 5 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0.5 0.5 FB FB 148.5 40 65 Taupadar 141 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 275 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MS 1500 MSO O 3 4500 1.0 0.6 0.6
SB SB 94.9 150 66 Taupadar 157 3 III - 146 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.6 0.6 SB SB 85.8 150
67 Taupadar 163 5 B D4 SiCL e1 III - 132 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Farm 40x 0 FP ------
68 Taupadar 163 Pond 1 40 - Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
0.9 0.5 149.0 0.5 FB - FB 40 69 Taupadar 165 1 B D4 SiCL e1 III 276 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.6 0.6 SB SB 74.75 150 70 Taupadar 166 5 B D4 SiCL e1 III - 115 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.6 0.6 SB SB 55.25 150 71 Taupadar 170 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 85 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 0.6 0.6 185 SB SB 57.85 150 72 Taupadar 7 C D3 L e2 II - 89 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0.5 101.5 0.5 188 FB FB 40 73 Taupadar 0 B D4 SiCL e1 III - 188 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co mp 1 12000 12000 Comp ost ost Pit Pit 0.4 0.6 0.6 SB SB 59.8 150 74 Taupadar 190 7 C D3 L e2 II - 92 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 0.6 162.5 0 150 75 Taupadar 202 7 C D3 L e2 III SB - SB 250 5 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dugw ell with 15000 150000 lifting DW 0 device - - - - LD ------1.0 0.5 156.0 0.5 40 76 Taupadar 206 6 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 289 4 6 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1 0.5 0.5 213 153.9 40 77 Taupadar 3 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 285 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Far m 40x RF 40x 218 RFP - 1 15000 0 0 1.1 Farm Pon 40 P 40 78 Taupadar 8 C D3 L e2 III Pond d 1 - - - 15000 - 0.7 0.5 144.7 0.5 40 79 Taupadar 227 2 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 268 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0.5 0.5 153.9 40 80 Taupadar 230 7 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 285 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 116.6 0.5 231 40 81 Taupadar 4 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 216 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0.5 130.6 0.5 239 40 82 Taupadar 0 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 242 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 126.3 0.5 40 83 Taupadar 242 5 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 234 4 6 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3 0.5 171.7 0.5 243 40 84 Taupadar 6 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 318 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MS 1500 MSO O 4 6000 0.5 0.5 138.2 0.5 40 85 Taupadar 244 7 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 256 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 97.2 40 86 Taupadar 246 3 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 180 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.4 0.5 0.5 189 40 44 87 Taupadar 248 3 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 350 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
88 Taupadar 248 Farm - Far 1 40x ------Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Pond m 40 Pon d 0.3 0.5 100.4 0.5 40 89 Taupadar 251 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 186 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0.5 0.5 92.88 40 90 Taupadar 252 9 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 172 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0.5 147.9 0.5 FB FB 40 91 Taupadar 255 1 C D3 L e2 II - 274 4 6 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.7 0.5 180.3 0.5 FB FB 40 92 Taupadar 261 5 C D3 L e2 III - 334 4 6 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 0.5 133.3 0.5 FB FB 40 93 Taupadar 263 5 C D3 L e2 II - 247 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0.5 152.2 0.5 40 FB FB 94 Taupadar 264 0 C D3 L e2 II - 282 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 0.6 0.6 SB SB 78 150 95 Taupadar 266 9 C D3 L e2 II - 120 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.3 0.5 208.4 0.5 40 269 FB FB 96 Taupadar 6 C D3 L e2 II - 386 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0.6 0.6 SB SB 79.3 150 97 Taupadar 272 6 C D3 L e2 II - 122 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.7 0.5 173.3 0.5 40 FB FB 98 Taupadar 276 6 C D3 L e2 II - 321 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MS 1500
MSO O 3 4500 0.9 0.5 0.5 40 FB FB 170.1 99 Taupadar 277 5 C D3 L e2 II - 315 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.9 0.5 0.5 40 FB - FB 126.9 0 Taupadar 279 1 C D3 L e2 II 235 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.5 0.5 0.5 40 FB FB 135 1 Taupadar 281 2 C D3 L e2 III - 250 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1.3 0.5 0.5 40 FB - FB 213.3 2 Taupadar 282 8 C D3 L e2 III 395 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Far Farm m 40x RF 40x RFP 1 - 1 15000 0 0 10 Pond Pon 40 P 40 3 Taupadar 282 d - - - 15000 - 10 1.0 0.5 124.7 0.5 40 FB - FB 4 Taupadar 283 1 C D3 L e2 III 231 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.5 0.5 104.7 0.5 40 FB FB 5 Taupadar 284 3 B D4 SiCL e1 III - 194 4 6 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.5 138.2 0.5 40 0.9 FB FB 6 Taupadar 288 5 B D4 SiCL e1 III - 256 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0.5 0.5 40 291 0.5 FB - FB 95.04 7 Taupadar 1 B D4 SiCL e1 III 176 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 0.5 138.2 0.5 40 0.7 FB FB 8 Taupadar 294 5 B D4 SiCL e1 III - 256 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 0.5 0.5 40 45 0.7 FB - FB 121.5 9 Taupadar 297 1 B D4 SiCL e1 III 225 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Taupadar 301 1.4 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 330 0.5 178.2 - 0 0.5 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
0 2 4 4 11 Farm 40x - FP ------1 Taupadar 301 Pond 1 40 - 11 1.5 0.5 139.3 0.5 40 2 Taupadar 302 0 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 258 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.5 0.5 40 1.9 186.3 3 Taupadar 303 2 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 345 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.5 0.5 40 1.3 180.9 4 Taupadar 304 6 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 335 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Far m 40x RF 40x RFP - 1 15000 0 0 11 1.0 Farm Pon 40 P 40 5 Taupadar 307 4 B D4 SiCL e1 III Pond d 1 - - - 15000 - 11 1.4 0.5 184.1 0.5 40 6 Taupadar 308 2 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 341 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1.9 0.5 160.9 0.5 40 7 Taupadar 309 1 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 298 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1.6 0.5 170.6 0.5 40 8 Taupadar 310 0 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 316 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1.3 0.5 0.5 40 153.9 9 Taupadar 312 1 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 285 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1.8 0.5 182.5 0.5 40 0 Taupadar 313 2 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 338 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Far m 40x RF 40x RFP - 1 15000 0 0 12 1.3 Farm Pon 40 P 40 1 Taupadar 314 1 B D4 SiCL e1 II Pond d 1 - - - 15000 - 12 1.1 0.5 173.8 0.5 40 2 Taupadar 315 7 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 322 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Farm 40x - FP ------3 Taupadar 315 Pond 1 40 - 12 0.5 0.5 40 0.9 135 4 Taupadar 316 6 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 250 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0.5 0.5 40 1.2 197.1 5 Taupadar 317 6 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 365 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0.5 0.5 40 1.7 191.7 6 Taupadar 318 5 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 355 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Farm 40x - FP ------7 Taupadar 318 Pond 1 40 - 12 1.1 0.5 117.1 0.5 40 8 Taupadar 319 8 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 217 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1.3 0.5 156.0 0.5 40 9 Taupadar 320 8 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 289 4 6 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1.6 0.5 200.3 0.5 40 0 Taupadar 321 6 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 371 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.7 0.5 123.1 0.5 40
1 Taupadar 322 9 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 228 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 13 0.7 0.5 0.5 40 285 153.9
2 Taupadar 323 1 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
13 1.8 0.5 125.8 0.5 40 233 3 Taupadar 324 3 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MS 1500
MSO O 3 4500 13 0.5 138.2 0.5 40 0.4 256 4 Taupadar 325 5 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.5 177.1 0.5 40 1.3 328 5 Taupadar 326 3 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0.5 0.5 40 1.5 335 180.9 6 Taupadar 327 1 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Farm 40x - FP ------7 Taupadar 327 Pond 1 40 - 13 0.5 173.8 0.5 40 1.7 322 8 Taupadar 328 6 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 1.1 0.5 0.5 40 270 145.8 9 Taupadar 329 5 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1.4 0.5 0.5 40 295 159.3 0 Taupadar 330 0 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1.1 0.5 125.2 0.5 40 232 1 Taupadar 331 0 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1.3 0.5 0.5 40 315 170.1 2 Taupadar 332 2 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 2.8 0.5 127.4 0.5 40 236 3 Taupadar 333 7 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1.6 0.5 186.8 0.5 40 346 0 4 Taupadar 334 6 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 4 - 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1.6 0.5 173.3 0.5 40 321 5 Taupadar 335 0 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1.7 0.5 185.2 0.5 40 343 6 Taupadar 336 3 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1.3 0.5 0.5 40 360 194.4 7 Taupadar 337 3 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.5 171.1 0.5 40 1.2 317 8 Taupadar 338 1 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0.5 146.8 0.5 40 1.5 272 9 Taupadar 339 0 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Farm 40x - FP ------Taupadar 339 Pond 1 40 - 15 0.8 0.5 0.5 40 145 78.3 1 Taupadar 340 9 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1.4 0.5 143.6 0.5 40 266 2 Taupadar 341 1 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1.0 0.5 141.4 0.5 40 262
3 Taupadar 342 5 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1.8 0.6 0.6 196 127.4 0 150 4 Taupadar 343 2 B D4 SiCL e1 II SB - SB 5 - 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0.5 150.1 0.5 40 47 0.9 278
5 Taupadar 344 4 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
15 0.8 0.5 157.6 0.5 40 292 6 Taupadar 345 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1.4 0.5 155.5 0.5 40 288 0 7 Taupadar 346 0 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 2 - 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1.6 0.5 168.4 0.5 40 312 8 Taupadar 347 0 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0.9 0.6 139.7 0.6 215 0 150 9 Taupadar 348 5 B D4 SiCL e1 II SB - SB 5 5 - 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0.2 0.5 0.5 40 195 105.3 0 Taupadar 349 8 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1.0 0.5 116.6 0.5 40 1 Taupadar 352 8 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 216 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1.3 0.6 0.6 87.75 150 2 Taupadar 355 2 B D4 SiCL e1 III SB - SB 135 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0.6 0.6 0.6 SB SB 68.25 150 3 Taupadar 358 5 B D4 SiCL e1 III - 105 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1.4 0.5 130.6 0.5 40 4 Taupadar 363 9 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 242 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 150 368 0.6 SB SB 0.6 84.5 0.6 5 Taupadar 2 B D4 SiCL e1 III - 130 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0.5 135.5 0.5 40 371 1.2 FB FB 6 Taupadar 1 B D4 SiCL e1 II - 251 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0.6 0.6 1.1 276 179.4 0 150 7 Taupadar 372 0 B D4 SiCL e1 II SB - SB 5 - 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0.5 158.2 0.5 40 1.1 293 8 Taupadar 373 8 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1.4 0.5 141.4 0.5 40 262 9 Taupadar 374 7 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 1.4 0.5 171.7 0.5 40 318 0 Taupadar 375 3 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 1.4 0.5 154.4 0.5 40 286 1 Taupadar 376 4 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0.3 NF 10 0.5 58.3 40 2332. 1 30 - 2 Taupadar 377 5 C D3 L e2 II VR NFB VR B 8 4 2 58.32 8 0 0 2332.80 6700.01 17 1.1 NF 14 0.5 79.9 40 3196. 1 30 - 3 Taupadar 378 0 C D3 L e2 II VR NFB VR B 8 4 2 79.92 8 0 0 3196.80 2902.97 17 1.3 NF 13 0.5 40 1 30 - 4 Taupadar 379 8 C D3 L e2 II VR NFB VR B 5 4 72.9 72.9 2916 0 0 2916.00 2106 17 1.2 NF 13 0.5 73.9 40 2959. 1 30 - 5 Taupadar 380 7 C D3 L e2 II VR NFB VR B 7 4 8 73.98 2 0 0 2959.20 2327.77 17 1.7 NF 12 0.5 66.4 40 2656. 1 30 - 6 Taupadar 381 8 C D3 L e2 II VR NFB VR B 3 4 2 66.42 8 0 0 2656.80 1491.43 MS 1500 4
MSO O 6000 17 1.9 NF 18 0.5 99.3 40 3974. 1 30 -
7 Taupadar 382 5 C D3 L e2 II VR NFB VR B 4 4 6 99.36 4 0 0 3974.40 2040.90 48 17 1.0 NF 11 0.5 63.7 40 2548. 1 30 -
8 Taupadar 383 1 C D3 L e2 II VR NFB VR B 8 4 2 63.72 8 0 0 2548.80 2518.21 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
17 1.3 NF 11 0.5 63.7 40 2548. 1 30 - 9 Taupadar 384 6 C D3 L e2 II VR NFB VR B 8 4 2 63.72 8 0 0 2548.80 1879.26 18 1.2 NF 18 0.5 100. 100.9 40 4039. 1 30 - 0 Taupadar 385 0 C D3 L e2 II VR NFB VR B 7 4 98 8 2 0 0 4039.20 3370.54 18 1.1 NF 12 0.5 40 1 30 - 1 Taupadar 386 9 C D3 L e2 II VR NFB VR B 0 4 64.8 64.8 2592 0 0 2592.00 2185.06 18 1.5 NF 0.5 40 1 30 - 85 2 Taupadar 387 4 C D3 L e2 II VR NFB VR B 4 45.9 45.9 1836 0 0 1836.00 1193.4 18 1.7 NF 16 0.5 90.7 40 3628. 1 30 - 3 Taupadar 388 0 B D4 SiCL e1 II VR NFB VR B 8 4 2 90.72 8 0 0 3628.80 2134.08 18 2.2 NF 14 0.5 78.8 40 3153. 1 30 - 4 Taupadar 389 1 B D4 SiCL e1 II VR NFB VR B 6 4 4 78.84 6 0 0 3153.60 1429.24 18 1.4 NF 14 0.5 76.6 40 3067. 1 30 - 5 Taupadar 390 6 B D4 SiCL e1 II VR NFB VR B 2 4 8 76.68 2 0 0 3067.20 2104.44 18 1.0 NF 18 0.5 40 1 30 - 6 Taupadar 391 4 B D4 SiCL e1 II VR NFB VR B 0 4 97.2 97.2 3888 0 0 3888.00 3751.31 18 15 0.5 81.5 40 3261. 1.1 1 30 - NF 7 Taupadar 392 1 B D4 SiCL e1 III VR NFB VR B 1 4 4 81.54 6 0 0 3261.60 2929.51 18 0.5 48.0 40 1922. 2.1 1 30 - NF 89 8 Taupadar 393 7 B D4 SiCL e1 III VR NFB VR B 4 6 48.06 4 0 0 1922.40 887.537 18 12 0.5 66.4 40 2656. 1.1 1 30 - NF 9 Taupadar 394 3 B D4 SiCL e1 III VR NFB VR B 3 4 2 66.42 8 0 0 2656.80 2343.67 19 14 0.5 40 1.8 1 30 - NF 0 Taupadar 395 1 B D4 SiCL e1 III VR NFB VR B 5 4 78.3 78.3 3132 0 0 3132.00 1726.79 19 12 0.5 68.0 40 2721. 0.9 1 30 - NF 1 Taupadar 396 1 B D4 SiCL e1 III VR NFB VR B 6 4 4 68.04 6 0 0 2721.60 2987.71 19 1.8 NF 15 0.5 40 1 30 - 2 Taupadar 397 2 B D4 SiCL e1 III VR NFB VR B 0 4 81 81 3240 0 0 3240.00 1778.4 19 1.7 NF 10 0.5 58.3 40 2332. 1 30 - 3 Taupadar 398 4 B D4 SiCL e1 III VR NFB VR B 8 4 2 58.32 8 0 0 2332.80 1340.00 19 0.3 NF 10 0.5 40 1 30 - 4 Taupadar 399 4 B D4 SiCL e1 III VR NFB VR B 0 4 54 54 2160 0 0 2160.00 6276.70 19 1.3 0.5 171.1 0.5 40 317 5 Taupadar 400 0 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 1.4 0.5 146.8 0.5 40 272 6 Taupadar 401 7 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 1.2 0.6 0.6 192 124.8 0 150 7 Taupadar 402 7 B D4 SiCL e1 III SB - SB 5 - 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 1.6 0.5 0.5 40 380 205.2 8 Taupadar 403 9 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 1.4 0.6 126.7 0.6 195 150 9 Taupadar 404 7 B D4 SiCL e1 II SB - SB 5 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Farm 40x - FP ------
Taupadar 404 Pond 1 40 - 20 1.5 0.5 0.5 40 345 186.3
1 Taupadar 405 2 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 20 1.8 0.5 165.2 0.5 40 306
2 Taupadar 406 2 B D4 SiCL e1 II FB - FB 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
20 1.5 0.6 0.6 178 115.7 150 3 Taupadar 407 3 B D4 SiCL e1 II SB - SB 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1.2 0.5 174.9 0.5 40 324 4 Taupadar 408 1 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 6 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1.4 0.5 144.1 0.5 40 267 5 Taupadar 409 2 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1.5 0.5 0.5 40 350 189 6 Taupadar 410 6 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1.8 0.5 0.5 40 305 164.7 7 Taupadar 411 4 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1.0 0.5 173.3 0.5 40 321 8 Taupadar 412 6 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1.7 0.5 0.5 40 275 148.5 9 Taupadar 413 6 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Farm 40x - FP ------0 Taupadar 413 Pond 1 40 - 21 0.5 0.5 40 0.7 220 118.8 1 Taupadar 414 9 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0.5 0.5 40 1.4 345 186.3 2 Taupadar 415 2 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0.5 195.4 0.5 40 1.5 362 3 Taupadar 416 6 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 8 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0.5 0.5 40 1.8 320 172.8 4 Taupadar 417 0 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0.5 120.9 0.5 40 1.0 224 5 Taupadar 418 6 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 6 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0.6 0.5 156.0 0.5 40 289 6 Taupadar 427 1 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 6 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0.7 0.5 122.0 0.5 40 226 7 Taupadar 428 9 C D3 L e2 II FB - FB 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 2.2 0.6 240 156 0 0 150 8 Taupadar 429 2 C D3 L e2 II SB - SB 5 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 1.6 0.6 0.6 114 74.1 0 150 9 Taupadar 430 0 C D3 L e2 II SB - SB 5 - 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 1.2 0.5 0.5 40 225 121.5 0 Taupadar 431 6 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 1.3 0.5 0.5 40 240 129.6 1 Taupadar 432 2 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Farm 40x - FP ------2 Taupadar 432 Pond 1 40 - 22 1.1 0.5 0.5 40 275 148.5 3 Taupadar 433 0 C D3 L e2 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 2.2 0.6 0.6 116 75.4 0 150 4 Taupadar 434 3 B D4 SiCL e1 III SB - SB 5 - 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0.5 0.5 40 0.2 210 113.4
5 Taupadar 435 7 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 22 0.6 1.9 220 143 0 0 150
6 Taupadar 522 2 B D4 SiCL e1 III SB - SB 5 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
22 0.3 0.5 0.5 40 265 143.1 7 Taupadar 527 7 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0.2 0.5 0.5 40 134 72.36 8 Taupadar 528 6 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 1.4 0.5 187.9 0.5 40 348 9 Taupadar 529 1 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 2 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 1.3 0.6 0.6 172 111.8 0 150 0 Taupadar 530 3 B D4 SiCL e1 III SB - SB 5 - 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0.3 0.5 0.5 40 176 95.04 1 Taupadar 531 1 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 1.9 0.6 0.6 156 101.4 0 150 2 Taupadar 532 3 B D4 SiCL e1 III SB - SB 5 - 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dugw ell with 15000 150000 lifting DW 0 device - - - - LD ------23 0.5 0.5 40 1.4 315 170.1 3 Taupadar 540 3 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0.5 0.5 40 0.2 156 84.24 4 Taupadar 557 9 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0.5 0.5 40 0.2 178 96.12 5 Taupadar 609 5 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0.5 132.8 0.5 40 1.0 246 6 Taupadar 658 6 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0.5 0.5 40 0.7 127 68.58 7 Taupadar 663 3 B D4 SiCL e1 III FB - FB 4 - 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 100 0.1 0.6 0.6 SB SB 96 62.4 150 8 Taupadar 9 4 B D4 SiCL e1 III - 5 - 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT 24 - - 0 Taupadar 113 0.21 B D4 SiCL e1 II GC - GC 8 - 0 - - - 6000 - 0 0 0 - 24 6000 - - 1 Taupadar 125 0.18 B D4 SiCL e1 II GC - GC 6 - 0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 24 6000 - - 2 Taupadar 132 0.13 B D4 SiCL e1 II GC - GC 6 - 0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 24 6000 - - 3 Taupadar 172 0.18 B D4 SiCL e1 II GC - GC 10 - 0 - - - - 0 0 0 - 24 6000 - - 4 Taupadar 201 0.26 B D4 SiCL e1 II GC - GC 10 - 0 - - - - 0 0 0 0 CD - CD 24 small smal 4 - - - 0 - - - 30000 - 0 0 0 0 5 Taupadar 204 0.11 B D4 SiCL e1 II l DBI 35000 0 - - - DBI 0 - 0 0 350000 CD CD CD CD 20000 24 223 small smal 8 - - 0 - - - - 0 0 200000 340689.7 Big Big 0
6 Taupadar 0.59 B D4 SiCL e1 II l 51 24 DW - DW 14000 - - - 0 - - - - 0 0
7 Taupadar 245 0.72 B D4 SiCL e1 II 1 0 0 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
24 ------0 0 8 Taupadar 311 1.07 B D5 SiCL e2 II WHS - WHS 1 0 150000 0 RIDGE AREA TREATMENT WITH PLANTATION 25 10.2 CCT - CCT 715 2651. 60.00 76 III - 0 Taupadar 6 B D4 SiCL e3 0 - 42 - 0 0.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 CCT - CCT 373 1386. 60.00 95 III - 1 Taupadar 5.35 B D4 SiCL e2 3.4 - 2 - 0 0.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 WAT - WAT 675 60.00 25 103 25.6 III 5.0 5643. - 2 Taupadar 8 B D4 SiCL e3 7 - 4 - 0 0.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 CCT - CCT 260 965.3 60.00 120 III - 3 Taupadar 3.75 B D4 SiCL e3 0 - 8 - 0 0.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Plantn - Plan 2.5 20000. 124 IV - 4 Taupadar 7.35 B D4 SiCL e3 tn 0 - - - 0 - - - 00 0 0 0.00 0 80 224 623.9 SC 8400.0 1445.85 25 140 5.81 B D4 SiCL e3 III SCT SCT SCT - 0. 0.30 140 140 60.00 - 0 0 0.5 1 T 0 4 5 Taupadar 00 25 WAT - WAT 875 60.00 153 III - 6 Taupadar 3.33 B D4 SiCL e3 .92 - 734.1 - 0 0.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 22.7 878 2445. SC 10440. 25 159 B D4 SiCL e3 III SCT SCT SCT - 0. 0.30 174 174 60.00 - 0 0 458.432 7 0.6 14 T 00 7 Taupadar 00 25 23.2 - 611 5111. 60.00 III - 8 Taupadar 160 6 B D4 SiCL e2 WAT WAT 8.31 - 36 - 0 0.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29.2 112 3145. SC 9360.0 319.590 25 B D4 SiCL e3 III SCT SCT SCT - 00. 0.30 156 156 60.00 - 0 0 9 95 3 T 0 8 9 Taupadar 171 00 26 - 183 1533. 60.00 III - 0 Taupadar 181 6.98 B D7 SiCL e4 WAT WAT 6.01 - 8 - 0 0.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 33.2 128 3570. SC 11520. 346.455 26 B D4 SiCL e4 III SCT SCT SCT - 00. 0.30 192 192 60.00 - 0 0 5 22 5 T 00 6 1 Taupadar 202 00 26 25.9 Plantn - Plan 20. Pla 20000. 60000. IV - 2 Taupadar 211 7 B D4 SiCL e1 tn 65 - - ntn 3 - - - 00 0 0 00 2310.21 50 23.8 921 2565. SC 9000.0 376.779 26 B D4 SiCL e1 III SCT SCT SCT - 0. 0.30 150 150 60.00 - 0 0 9 2.5 4 T 0 7 3 Taupadar 225 00 26 664 2465. 60.00 III - 4 Taupadar 229 9.54 B D4 SiCL e4 CCT - CCT 0 - 40 - 0 0.37 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Plantn - Plan 4.1 20000. III - 5 Taupadar 234 8.55 B D4 SiCL e1 tn 5 - - - 0 - - - 00 0 0 0.00 0 26 27.2 171 6356. III - 6 Taupadar 238 1 B D4 SiCL e4 CCT - CCT 20 - 6 - 0 0.37 0 0 60.00 0 0 0 0 40 143 399.7 SC 7200.0 1935.48 26 3.72 B D4 SiCL e1 IV SCT SCT SCT - 0. 0.30 120 120 60.00 - 0 0 5.4 T 7 Taupadar 257 5 00 0 4 26 22.7 Plantn - Plan 15. Pla 20000. 40000. 1760.51 IV - 52 8 Taupadar 300 2 B D4 SiCL e1 tn 32 - - ntn 2 - - - 00 0 0 00 3
26 Taupadar 364 4.99 B D4 SiCL e1 IV Plantn - Plan 2.3 - - - 0 - - - 20000. - 0 0 0.00 0 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
9 tn 8 00 WAT - WAT 134 60.00 27 9.3 1127. - 0 Taupadar 367 5.13 B D7 SiCL e4 III 9 - 34 - 0 0.84 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0.7 0 2 Taupadar 47 3.49 B D4 SiCL e1 III CB - CB 300 5 225 - 0 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0.7 0 3 Taupadar 52 5.04 B D4 SiCL e1 III CB - CB 200 5 150 - 0 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aven ue - 27 Avenue Plant 4 Taupadar 64 0.55 B D4 SiCL e1 III Plantn - n 900 - - - 0 - - - 20 0 0 0 Aven ue - 27 Avenue Plant 5 Taupadar 89 0.59 B D4 SiCL e1 III Plantn - n 900 - - - 0 - - - 20 0 0 0 27 0 6 Taupadar 99 4.67 B D4 SiCL e1 III CB - CB 300 0.75 225 - 0 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aven ue - 27 Avenue Plant 7 Taupadar 100 0.51 B D4 SiCL e1 IV Plantn - n 900 - - - 0 - - - 20 0 0 0 27 0 8 Taupadar 102 2.74 B D4 SiCL e1 IV CB - CB 100 0.75 75 - 0 0.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aven ue - 27 Avenue Plant 9 Taupadar 104 0.60 B D4 SiCL e1 III Plantn - n 900 - - - 0 - - - 20 0 0 0 Aven ue - 28 Avenue Plant 0 Taupadar 290 0.27 B D4 SiCL e1 IV Plantn - n 900 - - - 0 - - - 20 0 0 0 Aven ue - 28 Avenue Plant 1 Taupadar 352 0.42 B D4 SiCL e1 IV Plantn - n 850 - - - 0 - - - 20 0 0 0 588. 3056. 3056. 84974 164539 TOTAL 67586 0 0 422780 44 4 36 .4 4 N.B: NFB- New Field Bund, RFP- Renovation of Farm Pond, MSO-Masonry Stone Outlet, DWLD-Dugwell with Lifting Device, FP-Farm Pond
53
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
4.2 Details of Engineering Structures DETAILS OF EXISTING ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Dimensions Nature Total Cost of Repairs if any Structur Year Remarks of e Type Skille Unski Community Sl.N Nearest Location of about its Repair and Lengt Botto d lled Mate Contributio Total Grant o Gat No. Constr Top Heigh effectiven with Total Identific h m Labo Labo rial n uction width t ess /Status Specifica Cost ation (mtr) width ur ur Cost tion Cost Cost Contou Well No 1 r Bund 47, 52,99,102 2015 900 0.9 0.6 0.6 Condition repair - - - - 6480.00 34020.00 CCT 76,95,120, 3400 Well No 2 229,238 2012 0 0.6 0.6 0.6 Condition repair - - - - 132288.00 695512.00 CD(Sm Well No 3 all) 204, 223 2013 3.65 0.45 0.9 0.75 Condition repair - - - - 14400.00 345600.00 DW Well No 4 245 2013 10 0.9 0.6 0.6 Condition repair - - - - 5600.00 134400.00 Piscicultur e and 2013 Renovati Farm 17,28, 49,163, 218, Irrigation/ 5 and 14 1.52 5.0 1.82 on - - - - 216000.00 864000.00 Pond 248, 282, 01, 307, Few bund 2014 required 314, 315, 318, 327, broken 339, 404, 413, 432 and silted Field 4048 Well No 6 Bund ** 2013 9 0.6 1.37 0.6 Condition repair - - - - 175168.00 700672.00 SGP 113, 125, 132, Well No 7 172,201 2014 3 0.6 0.6 0.75 Condition repair - - - - 38400.00 201600.00 19, 20, 25, 31, Stone 37,43,53,55, 58, Well No 8 Bundin 60, 61, 65, 66,69, 2014 6994 0.6 0.75 0.6 - - - - 34272.00 137088.00 Condition repair
g 7, 85, 123, 19, 157, 54
163, 166, 170, 185, Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
190, 202, 266, 272, 343, 348, 355, 358, 368, 372, 402, 404,407, 429, 430, 434, 522, 530, 532, 1009 SCT 140, 159, 171, 202, 4578 Well No 9 225, 257 2013 5 0.9 0.6 0.45 Condition repair - - - - 123072.00 646128.00 WAT 103, 153, 160, 181, 1693 Well No 10 367 2012 4 0.9 0.75 0.9 Condition repair - - - - 812832.00 203208.00 WHS Well No 11 311 2013 24 1.82 4.5 1.21 Condition repair - - - - 20160.00 126000.00 Threshi Well No 12 ng 2012 10.5 9.15 - 0.6 - - - - 12500.00 37500.00 Condition repair Floor Near to AWC 1591172.0 TOTAL 0 4125728.00
** Not possible to put the gat no. of 150 nos.
55 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
DETAILS OF PROPOSED STRUCTURES Lengt Elev Tim Rain Peak Design Structu Catchment area in Ha. Total Cost Comm h of atio e of fall run- Dimens Stor Total re Type Nearest unity Sl. Catch n con Inte off ion of age Skille Unskill Contri Grant Rem and Location Mat No Tot ment diffe cen nsity rate structu Capa d ed Total bution (Rs.La arks Identifi Gat No. 1 2 3 4 erial al in renc trat (mm (m/s res city Labou Labour Cost (Rs. kh) cation Cost mtr. e ion /hr.) ec) (mtr) r Cost Cost Lakh) 1hr 0.27 0.646 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.5 1.9 135 10% / 1200 10.14x 250 1.68 72 8 56 1 CD Big 223 5 3 5 5 8 mtr 3 1.22x1 cul. 0.32 1.68 5.5 Compo 41, - - 1200 4.57x2. Cum - - - - - NRE 2 st Pit 66,188 ------44x1 . - GS 1hr 0.49 1.3 0.1 0.6 1.2 2.2 210 10% / 1200 3 2.5x1.8 6.8 1.155 3 5 5 3 DBI 204 5 0.2 3 5 3 mtr x1.5 cul. 0.50 3 Dugwel l with 15, 73, 0.4 0.7 0.3 2.0 1hr 8.23x3. 100 0.87 2.032 2.3 4 0.5 160 10% 1200 3 5.28 0.72 5.28 Lifting 202, 532 5 5 5 5 / 05x0.6 Cul. 12 8 76 Device mtr 8, 26, 32, 43, 56, 141, 1.0x0.3 0.07 0.173 0.2 0.074 ------1200 - - 0.45 0.45 Masonr 243, x0.6 43 25 025 87 y Stone 276, 5 Outlet 324, 381 Nadep 3.65x1. 5.6 0.02 0.069 0.0 ------1200 0.18 6 Pit 37, 85 3 52x1.0 cum. 97 3 81 0.02 0.18 12, 13, 15, 16, 0.11 0.263 0.3 0.68 7 NFB ------1200 3 17,377- 6x1.52x 4.2 29 44 079 427 0.165 0.6842
399 0.45 cul 6 7 Plantati 0.30x0. NRE ------1200 3 ------8 on 211, 300 3x0.45 - GS 56
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
17, 1hr Renov. 28,218, 0.1 0.2 1.2 14x14x 500 0.12 0.291 0.3 0.75 9 0.3 0.5 120 10% / 1200 3 0.144 0.756 0f Farm 282, 8 5 3 3.04 Cul. 47 06 402 6 mtr Pond 307, 314 140, 159, 3.65x0. 1 0.07 0.180 0.2 0.46 0.089 0.4697 10 SCT 171, ------1200 3 6x0.45 Cul. 75 85 114 973 47 3 202, 225, 257 Vermi 6.5 3.04x1. NRE 11 Compo 11, 20 ------1200 - Cum ------82x1.2 GS st Unit . 1.0 1.2 2.5 2.6 7.4 2.06 4.812 5.6 12.5 2.033 12.50 Total 8 3 3 5 9 25 5 25 0 94
57 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
4.3 Baseline and Summary of S&WC Measure Investment Plan as per table 4.1 (Use only relevant measures as CCA measure: refer Para 7 on Indicative Investment Options) 1 Units (Nos.) Average Cost (Rs.Lakh)
WS- CCA Proposal WS-CCA Average Cost Proposed under CCA Total Cost per Unit Post WS Sl.N0. Area Treatment Unit Pre Redesigned Units Remarks (Business WS of Existing New Posts New New As usual Redesigned Redesigned Total Units Units WS-CCA of Existing Units of Existing Units Units Units A B C D E F G=D+F H I J=E*H K=F*I L=J+K A. Soil Erosion and Degradation Control Measures 1 Physical Measures a) Renov. of FP Nos. 0 18 6 0 18 0.15 0 0.9 0 0.9 b) SCT Cum. 0 12750 0 932 13682 0 932 0 0.0006 0.5592 Total of 1 13700 0.9 0.0006 1.4592 2 Vegetation cover on exiting treated and reclaimed land a) Compost Pit Nos. 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0.12 6 0.72 b) Nadep Pit Nos. 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0.1 2 0.2 c) Plantation Ha. 0 36 5 0 36 0.2 0 0.2 5 1 Vermi Compot d) Unit Nos. 0 2 0 2 4 0.1 2 0 2 0.2 Total of 2 0 42 0.42 15 2.12 B. Land Reclamation Measures a) NFB Cum. 0 35635 0 2124.4 37759.36 0.0004 2124.4 0.849744 0.0004 0.84974 b) Masonry SO Nos. 0 27 0 35 62 0.015 35 0.525 35 0.53 Total of B 0 37821.36 1.374744 35.0004 1.374744 C. Irrigation Measurement Meaures a) CD Big Nos. 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 b) DBI Nos. 0 0 0 1 1 3.5 1 3.5 1 3.5
Dugwell with c) 0 0 0 4 4 1.5 4 6 4 6 lifting device Nos. Total of C 0 6 11.5 6 11.5 58
Grand Total 0 51569.36 14.19474 56.001 16.45394 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
4.4 Source of Finance for S&WC (Please indicate possible convergence proposed with the existing programmes in the table below apart from the interventions proposed under the project)
Community NABARD Other source - (Rs. lakh) S.No. Activity Name contribution Total (Rs. Lakh) (Rs. Lakh) Rs. Lakh) a) Name of source Amount 1 Check Dam 1.680 0.320 No - 2.00 2 Compost Pit - - MGNREGS 0.72 0.72 3 DBI 3.000 0.500 No - 3.50 Dugwell with 4 5.280 0.720 - - 6.00 Lifting Device Masonry stone 5 0.450 0.075 - - 0.53 outlet 6 Nadep Pit 0.180 0.020 - - 0.20 7 New Field Bund 0.684 0.166 - - 0.85 8 Plantation-Forestry - - OFDC 1 1.00 Renov. of Farm 9 0.756 0.144 - - 0.90 Pond 10 SCT 0.470 0.089 - - 0.56 11 Vermi Compost - - MGNREGS 0.2 0.20 Unit Total 12.50 0.203 1.94 16.454
4.5 Activity wise technical and cost norms for S&WC and justification thereof: Technical Norms and Cost S.No. Activity Name Norms Justification for the activity
1 CD Big 10.14x 1.22x1 & 2.00 Lakh The cost including Labour, cement and Material
2 Compost Pit 4.57x2.44x1 Convergence 59
3 DBI 2.5x1.8x1.5 & 3.50 Lakh The cost including Pipe, Labour and Material Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
4 Dugwell with Lifting Device 8.23x3.05x0.6 & 6.00 Lakh The cost including Labour, Material and Lifting device 5 Masonry Stone Outlet 1.0x0.3x0.6 & 0.52 Lakh The cost including Labour, cement and Material 6 Nadep Pit 3.65x1.52x1.0 The cost including Labour, Material and Lifting device 7 NFB 6x1.52x0.45 & 0.85 Lakh The cost remain same 8 Plantation 0.30x0.3x0.45 Convergence 9 Renov. 0f Farm Pond 14x14x3.04 & 0.90 Lakh The cost including only Labour 10 SCT 3.65x0.6x0.45 & 0.56 Lakh The cost including only Labour 11 Vermi Compost Unit 3.04x1.82x1.2 Convergence 5. Soil Improvement and productivity enhancement measures 5.1 Soil baseline and targets of soil status Pre-water-shed Post WS- Business as Post WS-CCA (plan) – (ha.) S.No. Particulars (ha.) Usual (ha.)
Drainage Good 0.10 0.45 1 Moderate 0.25 - Poor - - Use of unsustainable chemicals 0 0 0 2 Use of Chemical fertilizers 393.56 254.85 215.35 Use of chemical pesticides 406.72 307.10 227.63 3 Soil nutrient status a NPK and micro nutrient efficiency (based on the soil test analysis) 287.95 350.33 405.25 4 Problematic soils (if the same is present in the watershed area) Soil acidity critical area 354.22 282.67 128.45 Source of acidity Application of Chemical Fertilizers & Pesticides Soil alkalinity critical area 270.65 210.1 150.55 Source of alkalinity Application of Chemical Fertilizers & Pesticides
Soil alkalinity critical area 270.65 210.1 150.55 60
Source of alkalinity Application of Chemical Fertilizers & Pesticides Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
BLOCK DATA FROM DDA, KORAPUT OR AAO, POTANGI OR RRTTS, SEMILIGUDA(OUAT) 5.2 Agriculture land use – baseline and targets Pre WS Project Post WS Project Projected CCA Scenario Ha. Product Yield/ha Total Ha. Product Yield/ha Total Ha. Product Yield/ha Total S.N Type Name (Kg.) yield Name (Kg.) yield (ltr Name (Kg.) yield (ltr (ltr or or Kg) or Kg) Kg) Kharif 1 Cereals 273 i)Paddy 1200 327600 285 i) Paddy 1500 427500 320 i)Paddy 1800 576000 165 ii)Ragi 1000 165000 180 ii) Ragi 1200 216000 200 ii)Ragi 1400 280000 2 Pulses 25 i)Dongarani 500 12500 35 i)Dongarani 600 21000 40 i)Dongarani 700 28000 ii) ii) ii) Rabi 1 Cereals 95 i)Paddy 1500 142500 95.4 i) Paddy 1800 171720 95.4 i)Paddy 2000 190800 20 ii)Maize 2000 40000 23 ii) Maize 2500 57500 25 ii)Maize 2600 65000 2 Oilseeds 20 i)Niger 500 10000 25 i) Niger 600 15000 30 i)Niger 700 21000 ii) ii) ii)
3 Vegitables/Spice 52 i)Ginger 6000 312000 58 i) Ginger 6200 359600 65 i)Ginger 6500 422500 10 ii)Beans 2000 20000 12 ii) Beans 2200 26400 15 ii)Beans 2400 36000
61
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
BLOCK DATA FROM DDA, KORAPUT OR AAO, POTANGI 5.3 Soil improvement and productivity enhancement plan (activities) Units Cost (Rs. lakh) WS-CCA Cost per WS – CCA Proposal Cost proposed under CCA Total unit Post WS units S.N Particulars Unit Pre Additional Additional Additional Remarks (Business New Post New WS inputin input in input in as usual) Areas WS- Areas New Total existing existing existing covered CCA covered areas areas areas A B C D E F G=D+F H I J=E*H K=F*I L=J+K 1 Soil improvement and productivity enhancement 1 Promotion of Biofertilizer handi No. 0 10 640 0 10 300 0 1.92 0 1.92 Khata/jiba Mruta Tank silt Ha. 0 20 90 0 20 1400 0 1.26 0 1.26 2 Application Vermicompost No 0 4 10 0 4 10000 0 1 0 1 3 unit 4 Green Manuring ha 0 8 408 0 4 250 0 1.02 0 1.02 5 Deep ploughing ha 0 10 78 0 10 1500 0 1.17 0 1.17 6 Soil testing No 0 4 200 0 4 25 0 0.05 0 0.05 Application of using Ha 0 2 250 0 2 1000 0 2.5 0 2.5 gypsum/paper 7 mill slag. TOTAL 54 54 8.92 8.92
62
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
DISTRICT SOIL TESTING LAB 5.4. Source of finance for soil improvement (Please indicate possible convergence proposed with the existing programmes in the table below apart from the interventions proposed under the project)
NABARD Community contribution Other source - (Rs. lakh) S.No. Activity Name Total (Rs. Lakh) (Rs. Lakh) Name of source Amount 1 Promotion of Biofertilizer Handi 1.6 0.32 - - 1.92 Khata/Jiba Mruta 2 Tank silt Application 0.84 0.42 - - 1.26 3 Vermicompost unit 0.5 0 DDA 0.5 1.0 4 Green Manuring 1.02 0 - - 1.02 5 Deep ploughing 1.0 0.17 - - 1.17 6 Soil testing 0.04 0.01 - - 0.05 Application of using gypsum/paper mill 2.5 0 - - 2.5 7 slag. Total 7.5 0.92 - 0.5 8.92
63 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
5.5 Activity wise technical norms for soil improvement and justification thereof S.No. Activity Name Technical Norms and Cost Justification for the activity Norms Promotion of Biofertilizer handi 1.92 For 128 nos. of HH having 5 1 Khata/jiba Mruta nos.of handi khata per HH 2 Tank silt Application 1.26 Rs.1400/- per Hectare. 3 Vermicompost unit 1 Rs.10000/- per Unit 25 Kg Dhanicha Seed @Rs. 4 Green Manuring 1.02 60/kg at Rs.250/- per unit 5 Deep ploughing 1.17 Rs.1500/- per Ha. Total 80 Ha. Rs.25/- per testing total 200 6 Soil testing 0.05 nos.of plot Application of using 2000 Kg required @Rs. 10/25 7 gypsum/paper mill slag. 2.5 Kg Total 8.92
64
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
6. Promotion of sustainable NRM, CCA farming, livelihood and food security 6.1 NRM and CCA farming practices 6.1.1 Plan of investment Units Cost (Rs. lakh) Remarks WS – CCA Total WS-CCA Cost Post units Cost proposed under CCA Pre WS Proposal per Unit Uni Addition Post Addition New Additional New S.N Particulars W (Busin New t al input WS- al input areas input in areas S ess as areas in CCA in Cover existing Cover Total usual) cover existing existing ed areas ed ed area areas A B C D E F G=D+F G H I=E*G J=F*H K=I+J Crop diversification (Promotion of 1 Niger, horse gram & dongarani) Ha. - 20 40 0 20 0.068 0 2.7 0 2.7 Crop intensification (Promotion of 2 Beans & Cauliflower) Ha. - 30 45 0 30 0.068 0 3.0375 0 3.0375 Agro-forestry Ha. 5 5 5 0.104 3 (Silverhook,Gliricidia) 0 0 0.52185 0 0.52185 Introduction of CC resilient 4 crop1.Line transplanting of Paddy. Ha. 10 20 0 10 0.090 0 1.795 0 1.795 5 .Line transplanting of Millet Ha 2 60 0 2 0.027 0 1.62 0 1.62 6 Other – Sunflowers seed Ha. 12 0 0.100 0 1.194 0 1.194 7 Back yard plantation Nos 5 60 0 5 0.003 0 0.186 0 0.186 8 Nutritional Garden Nos 6 60 0 6 0.003 0 0.186 0 0.186 9 Arhar Demonstration Ha. 1 5 0 1 0.036 0 0.1775 0 0.1775 10 Potato Demonstration Ha. 0.5 2 0 0.5 0.600 0 1.2 0 1.2 Total 79.5 309 0 79.5 0 12.6179 0 12.6179
65
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
6.1.2 Source of finance for sustainable NRM and CCA farming (Please indicate possible converge proposed with the existing programmes in the table below apart from the interventions proposed under the project) Community NABARD (Rs. Other source - (Rs. lakh) Total (Rs. Sl.NO Activity Name contribution Rs. Lakh) Lakh) Lakh) a) Name of source Amount 1 Crop diversification(Promotion of 2.241 0.459 - - 2.700 Niger,horse gram & dongarani) 2 Crop intensification(Promotion of 2.552 0.486 - - 3.038 Beans & Cauliflower) 3 Agro-forestry(Silverhook,Gliricidia) 0.417 0.104 OFDC 0.225 0.747
4 Introduction of CC resilient 1.508 0.287 DDA 0.32 2.115 crop1.Line transplanting of Paddy. 5 2.Line transplanting of Millet 1.361 0.259 DDA 0.808 2.428 6 Other – Sunflowers seed 0.955 0.239 - - 1.194 7 Back yard plantation 0.186 0.000 - - 0.186 8 Nutritional Garden 0.186 0.000 - - 0.186 9 Arhar Demonstration 0.142 0.036 - - 0.178 10 Potato Demonstration 0.960 0.240 DDA 0.3 1.200 Total 10.51 2.11 1.353 13.97
66
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
6.1.3 Activity wise technical norms for sustainable NRM and CCA farming justification thereof Technical Norms and S.No. Activity Name Justification for the activity Cost Norms 1 CD Big 10.14x 1.22x1 & 2.00 Lakh The cost including Labour, cement and Material 2 Compost Pit 4.57x2.44x1 3 DBI 2.5x1.8x1.5 & 3.50 Lakh The cost including Pipe, Labour and Material Dugwell with Lifting 8.23x3.05x0.6 & 6.00 Lakh The cost including Labour, Material and Lifting device 4 Device 5 Masonry Stone Outlet 1.0x0.3x0.6 & 0.52 Lakh The cost including Labour, cement and Material 6 Nadep Pit 3.65x1.52x1.0 The cost including Labour, Material and Lifting device 7 NFB 6x1.52x0.45 & 0.85 Lakh The cost remain same 8 Plantation 0.30x0.3x0.45 9 Renov. 0f Farm Pond 14x14x3.04 & 0.90 Lakh The cost including only Labour 10 SCT 3.65x0.6x0.45 & 0.56 Lakh The cost including only Labour 11 Vermi Compost Unit 3.04x1.82x1.2 6.2 Income generation and livelihood promotion 6.2.1 Income by house holds (FOCUSSED GROUP DISCUSSION) Reference Year: 2015-16 Household category Number in Average income from different sources (Rs) Total sample Agri. Labour Non-agri Workers Agriculture Other sources Landless 12 3000 5220 - - 8220 0 -1 ha 10 2500 1740 5000 - 9240 1-2 ha 8 1500 1000 10000 - 12500 2-4 ha 12 1000 2000 15000 18000 4-10 ha ------> 10 ha ------other categories ------
Total 42 8000 9960 30000 0 47960
Representation to all strata / groups of people in the area may be given in the sample. 67
Data source Reference Year : 2015-16 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
6.2.2 Livelihood and IGA promotion investment plan (non-traditional activities) (FOCUSSED GROUP DISCUSSION) Post –WS Pre-WS (Business as Post WS - CCA S.N Activity name Unit Usual) No of People No of People No of People units employed units employed units employed Enterprise level activity*
1 Rice hauller 1 - - - - 1 10 2 Leaf plate making 1 - - - - 1 12 3 Photo Studio 1 - - - - 1 1 4 Cycle repairing 1 - - - - 1 1 5 Febrication & welding 1 - - - - 1 2 Diversified HH level activity
1 Smokeless chulla 30 - - 10 10 30 30 *Select activities directly dependent or related to soil improvement and impact thereof
6.2.3 Livelihood and IGA activities - Source of finance(FOCUSSED GROUP DISCUSSION) Source 2 S.N Activity name Source 1 (Name) (Name) Source 3 (Name) Total 1 Rice hauller 0.4 NABARD - 0.10 Benificiary 0.5 2 Leaf plate making 0.4 NABARD - 0.10 Benificiary 0.5 3 Photo Studio 0.4 NABARD - 0.10 Benificiary 0.5 4 Cycle repairing 0.2 NABARD - 0.05 Benificiary 0.25
Febrication &
5 welding 0.4 NABARD - 0.10 Benificiary 0.5
6 Smokeless chulla 0.25 NABARD - 0.25 Benificiary 0.75 68
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
6.2.4 Livelihood and IGA activities - Activity wise technical norms S.No. Activity Name Technical Norms and Cost Norms Justification vis-à-vis climate change 1 Rice hauller Complete set 0.5 No rice hauler existing in the vicinity 2 Leaf plate making Complete set 0.5 SHG interested to establish the unit 3 Photo Studio Complete set 0.5 People are going far distance to take a snap 4 Cycle repairing Complete set 0.25 People are going far distance to repair the cycle Febrication & 5 welding Complete set 0.5 Beneficiary interested to establish the unit Reduction of deforestation and protection from 6 Smokeless chulla 30 nos.of set 0.75 eye disease
6.3 Food and nutritional security(FOCUSSED GROUP DISCUSSION) 6.3.1 Baseline and targets S. Particular Pre Post WS Post WS - No WS (BUS) CCA 1 Below Poverty Level families (No.) 170 165 135 2 Families getting regular supply from PDS (Nos.) 165 158 135 3 Families Not getting two meals a day 0 0 0 4 Health cards issued 0 30 80 5 HH with backyard dairy/ poultry/ fisheries/ kitchen garden 20 52 150 6 HH with at least one person with nutrient deficiency due to non-availability of 10 4 0 food or capacity to pay
69
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
6.3.2 Food and Nutritional Security - Pre CCA – Watershed (current level) (FOCUSSED GROUP DISCUSSION) Total Annual requirement for Production Current Distributed Shortfall Production Per food sufficiency retained for Short fall in Commodity for Production through in Capita (population X self Consumption food and in WS PDS production nutritional Requirement per capita consumption security requirement) Qty in A B C D E=B-A F =A-C-D Unit Unit qtl Qty Qty Qty Qty Qty Qty Rice 625 1027 625 1370 4104 1150 32.5 2964 187.5 Raagi 550 402 550 615 640 500 0 25 115 MinorMillet 180 140 180 171 186 150 0 46 21 Pulses 272 20 272 27 48 25 0 21 2 Vegetables & Spices 615 210 615 315 4500 260 0 4185 55
6.3.3 Target for Food and Nutritional Security Post CCA – Watershed (FOCUSSED GROUP DISCUSSION) Annual Total Import in Production per Production Shortfall in Commodity for requirement for WS with Net capita in WS Production food and food sufficiency income nutritional requirement security A B C=B-A D E=C-D Unit Qty Unit Qty Qty Qty Qty Qty Rice 711 1280 711 1600 5330 3730 34.3 3695.7 Raagi 615 522 615 705 832 127 0 127 MinorMillet 212 174 212 205 242 37 0 37 Pulses 320 26 320 33 63 30 0 30 Vegetables &
Spices 695 278 695 370 5850 5480 0 5480
Account for population growth during project period
70
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
7. Mitigation of CCA Risk CCA Risk Risk mitigation activity No of units Cost per unit Total cost No rice hauler existing in the vicinity Rice hauller 1 0.5 0.5 SHG interested to establish the unit Leaf plate making 1 0.5 0.5 People are going far distance to take a snap Photo Studio 1 0.5 0.5 People are going far distance to repair the cycle Cycle repairing 1 0.25 0.25 Beneficiary interested to establish the unit Febrication & welding 1 0.5 0.5 Reduction of deforestation and protection from eye disease Smokeless chulla 30 0.025 0.75 Total 3.0
71 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
8. Accompanying measures: capacity building, Institutional strengthening and knowledge management 8.1 Plan for investment / activities for accompanying measures(FOCUSSED GROUP DISCUSSION) WS (Business as Usual S.N Activity Scenario) CCA Scenario Total No. units Cost per Total Unit requiring New Total Nature of Capacity building, unit of cost of cost of Cost Total cost Additional Activit cost of institutional strengthening/ No. addition addition New No. Cost /unit (Rs.Lakh) input on y new Knowledge Management al al Activit current (No.) activity activity activity y activity A B C D E F G H I J K=B+I L=D+G+J Training on improve nutritional ------1 security 8 0.025 0.2 8 0.2 2 training on crop water budgeting. 6 0.025 0.15 ------6 0.15 Training on Improvement of Soil ------3 quality and health. 8 0.025 0.2 8 0.2 4 Training on crop of diversification. 6 0.055 0.33 ------6 0.33 5 Training on crop intesification. 8 0.025 0.2 ------8 0.2 6 Training on improve crop practices. 6 0.055 0.33 ------6 0.33 Exposure on crop diversification and ------7 intensification. 2 0.100 0.2 2 0.2 8 Exposure on integrated farming. 2 0.100 0.2 ------2 0.2 9 Exposure on Energy Efficiency. 2 0.100 0.2 ------2 0.2 10 Exposure on soil water ------conservation. 2 0.100 0.2 2 0.2 11 Training on IPM 4 0.025 0.1 ------4 0.1 12 Training on Post Harvest ------Management 4 0.025 0.1 4 0.1 Training on Preparation of Pot------13 Manure and Bijamruta, Jibamruta 3 0.03 0.09 3 0.09
TOTAL 2.5 2.5 72
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
8.2 Source of finance for accompanying measures (Please indicate possible converge proposed with the existing programmes in the table below apart from the interventions proposed under the project)
Community NABARD Other source - (Rs. lakh) S.No. Activity Name contribution Total (Rs. Lakh) Rs. Lakh) Name of source Amount 1 Training on improve nutritional security 0.2 0 NIL 0 0.2 2 training on crop water budgeting. 0.15 0 NIL 0 0.15 3 Training on Improvement of Soil quality and health. 0.2 0 NIL 0 0.2 4 Training on crop of diversification. 0.33 0 NIL 0 0.33 5 Training on crop intesification. 0.2 0 NIL 0 0.2 6 Training on improve crop practices. 0.33 0 NIL 0 0.33 7 Exposure on crop diversification and intensification. 0.2 0 NIL 0 0.2 8 Exposure on integrated farming. 0.2 0 NIL 0 0.2 9 Exposure on Energy Efficiency. 0.2 0 NIL 0 0.2 10 Exposure on soil water conservation. 0.2 0 NIL 0 0.2 11 Training on IPM 0.1 0 NIL 0 0.1 12 Training on Post Harvest Management 0.1 0 NIL 0 0.1 Training on Preparation of Pot-Manure and 13 Bijamruta, Jibamruta 0.09 0 NIL 0 0.09 TOTAL 2.50 0 0 2.50
8.3 Justification and norms for institutional development S.N Activity Justification Recommended resource Activity norm and Cost Institution norms 1 Watershed level Knowledge Farmer Prediction of the NABARD 1.25
Management (Weather Station) weather forecasting
73
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
ANNEX 4: RESULT FRAMEWORK Goal: Investments in improvement, stabilisation, conservation of natural resources is made to minimise the risk of climate change and to increase the productivity and income of communities living in watersheds. Outcome: To strengthen the adaptive capacity of the communities in watersheds and reduce their vulnerability to climate change Output 1: Soil and water conservation: Existing watersheds are rehabilitated and stabilised though redesigned and additional climate resilient soil and water conservation measures Component Indicator Baseline Target Source of Assumptions Anticipated Risk Risk mitigation verification measures proposed 1. Redesigning of S&WC, WHS-1 nos Renovation of PCR, DPR and Well Release of grant Submission of construction of visible on the SCT-17550 Farmpond-6 field verification participation of in right time utilisation and additional structures stream in cum nos And well community Increase of progress report Check dam rainy season SGP- 1954 SCT-932 cum inventory record Activeness of minimum wage in time and Stream cum Check Dam-1 VWC rate by Govt proper follow- flowing no. Expertise of PIA up for releasing through the and VWC grant year members Community will Increase in be mobilize for ground water additional table shramadan 2. Vegetation cover enhancement 3. Irrigation management Crop in rabi Dug Well with Field verification - community In time Promoted skill season lifting device- Interview with demand availability of of a local mason Yield increase 4nos farmer -drought quality mason Good develop DBI-1 No. mitigation Price hike of good measure materials relationship -big assets of with other farmers mason
4. Land reclamation Erosion control FB-18106 NFB- 2124.36 Filed verification It is community Unexpected Proper outlet
in the land cum cum proposal heavy rain and design will
Masonry Stone Availability of be maintained. 74
Outlet-35 nos. skill labour Vegetative Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Nadep Pit-2 Good measure should Nos. participation of be ensure farmers Crop rotation also promoted Output 2: Soil health improvement andProductivity enhancement: Soil health is improved and productivity is enhanced, which leads to secured and increased potential for production and productivity of animal husbandry and agriculture Component Indicator Baseline Target Source of Assumptions Anticipated Risk Risk mitigation verification measures proposed 1. Soil testing and HH Nil 200 Health card People interest Non cooperation Proper liaison introduction of soil and ability of of concerned health cards resource centre deptt at block level. 2. Management of soil Good health of Nil 78 Ha Personal Positive attitude Fund constraint Coordination structure: Deep crop interview of of Community , Available of and proper ploughing and summer Resistance to farmers/ field equipment planning for ploughing dry spell verification equipment hiring 3. Nutrient management: Increase in Nil 498 Ha Yield Good Farmer Community Regular Overall soil health yields by 1.5 measurement are awareness adoption and meeting, field (carbon content, time and soil test Disadvantages application follow-up availability of micro-and of chemical Capacity macro-nutrients) is fertiliser and Flash flood building of improved by application pesticides farmers of organic fertilizers, farm yard manure, green leaf, tank silt, vermin compost 4. Desalination and de- Crop health Nil 250 Ha Soil test Availability of Community Field demo and acidification raw materials resistance exposure
5. Decontamination and Availability of Nil 640 Nos. Physical Low cost local Lack of Field demo and de-toxification compost pit, verification at technology and community exposure
Jibamruta & HH level adapted by confidence 75
bio- pesticides farmer Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
at HH level Output 3: Sustainable NRM livelihood practices and CC resilient cropping systems are adopted Component Indicator Baseline Target Source of Assumptions Anticipated Risk Risk mitigation verification measures proposed 1. Crop diversification Low Paddy area 40 hector Personal Available of Community Regular interview & field land resource adoption meeting, verification and manpower training & exposure visit 2. Inter cropping and crop Increase in hector Yield It is easy Community Regular rotation income measurement & method and adoption meeting and personal support for training interview additional benefit to the farmer in same expenditure
3. Introduction of new CC Increase in Yield 20 hector Yield Scope of Community Regular resilient varieties measurement & marketing is adoption meeting and personal available increase crop training interview Increase the cultivation cost rate of vegetable and other materials
4. Sustainable NRM 5 Ha. practices such as agro- forestry is adopted 5. Introduction of Increase in 35 nos.of Interaction with Organised Marketing of the Regular market diversified livelihood income Beneficiaries group member group product and study and options Verification of price fluctuation liaison with records traders 6. Introduction of No under 120 house hold Verification of It is peoples Heavy rain fall Preparation
diversified sources of nourished child in Asha and ANM proposal Pest attack herbal and 76
food- kitchen garden, the village record Skill labour Epidemic spread organic Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
backyard poultry goat available in WS out pesticide rearing etc. Regular vaccination Crop and animal insurance Regular meeting with farmer Proper filed verification 7. Establishment of fodder banks 8. Creation of post harvest storage facilities etc. 9. 10. Output 4: CC Risk management practices are introduced Component Indicator Baseline Target Source of Assumptions Anticipated Risk Risk mitigation verification measures proposed 1. Introduction of resource Community 1nos Visit to centre Agri friendly Low literacy in Trained to centres/ agri-clinics, awareness and interview activity the area youth and SHG seed farms, common with community and VWC equipment and agri- member to input centres, village familiarise with knowledge centres, the system fodder banks 2. Improved connectivity Level of 1 nos Interaction with Farmers are Network Substitute with farmer call centres, community community aware about problem centre will find knowledge Verification of the progarmme out and a record person will be in charge to
communicate 77
community Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
problem at available net work place and recorder it in their records 3. Market information Level of 1 nos Visit to the field VWC and PIA Low literacy rate Trained to collection and community and interaction are more of the youth leader dissemination knowledge with community interested how community and VWC people will get member right price of Poster reading their produces in the meeting Regular follow- up 4. Formation of POs 5. Linkages with IMD Reduce crop 1nos verification of New technology Low literacy rate Trained to VWC weather stations and Loss and record of of the member advisory services damages weather community Collection of forecasting Disrupt of power spare parts in station supply advance Non availability of technical person or spare part at local level 6. Crop Insurance
Output 5: Accompanying Measures: Best practices of watershed level institutional strengthening, , capacity building, knowledge management, are developed integrated into participatory watershed development approaches for soil management as CCA tool. Component Indicator Baseline Target Source of Assumptions Anticipated Risk Risk mitigation verification measures proposed 1. Suitable institutional 2 nos Verification of Active VWC Low literacy Regular
structure for VWC record and member Community meeting 78
participatory meeting with Community fully conflict among Maintenance Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
management of WS are community participation villages and update developed record Joint verification etc 2. Capacity of Attendance 55 nos Verification of Good Low literacy rate Change stakeholders to and people training record participation of methodology sustainably manage participation and interview community Promote picture resources under CC are will increase with participants Availably of , stimulation developed resource person game Video and at local level audio show , poster reading etc 3. Knowledge 1 no. management tools are developed and implemented
79
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
STAKEHOLDER CONSULTTION REPORT
2. Livelihood Mapping a. Key livelihoods of people and identification of critical resources/ capital(FOCUSSED GROUP DISCUSSION) Critical resources/capital on which the livelihood depends Number Financial/ Natural Physical of People economic Type of Resources (goods resources (man- Human resource dependent resources Social resources (institutions livelihood and Services made (health, skills, such as SHGs, cooperatives, on (saleable assets provided by infrastructure knowledge) FIGs, WUG, VWC etc.) livelihood providing flow of nature and equipment liquidity) a.Storage godown Vegitable a.Bunded land /Thresser a.Vegitables a.Ind.Knowledge. a.VWC,UG,SHG,Individual 101 cultivation b.Drudery reduce b. b.Perenial Stream equipment. b.ketchup/ suss .Ind.Knowledge. b.SHG,Individual a.un bunded Mango orchard 4 upland a.Cold storage a.Fruits a. Ind.Knowledge a.UG,CIG,SHG b.Stream/Nalla b. b.Jelly/Ambasoda b. b. Animal 120 a.aboundantLand/ Husbandary Locals feed a.Gochar land a.Meat/Compost a.Ind.knowledge. a.UG,CIG
80 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
The majority of people of watershed dependent on Animal husbandry as their major source of livelihood due to availability of abundant grazing land and local feed.
The next major livelihood of the community is the vegetable cultivation. The presence of perennial source is a greater advantage to the community to take vegetable cultivation in the vast available un- bunded lands in the watersheds. The communities in the watersheds have good indigenous knowledge in vegetable cultivation. The availability of infrastructure such as drying yard, storage go-down and drudgery reducing farm implements and nearby cold storage, market helps them to take this livelihood option.
b. Seasonal Livelihood Calendar (SEASONAL CALENDER) S. Agricult O No. ure Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Jul Aug Sep ct Nov Dec 1 Beans HS P W H,S P W 2 Carrot H,S P W H,S P W 3 Potato H,S H/S P W H,S P W 4 Cabbage H,S P W W H,S P W 5 Ginger P P W W H,S 6 Paddy P 7 Ragi P W W H,S P P W H S 8 Maize P P W H S 9 Sweet Potato P W W H,S
P - Planting, W -weeding, H- harvesting, S –sale
The watershed experience Kharif and rabi vegetables. The planting times of Kharif vegetables are mostly in July as they are depends upon the rain and in rabi the plantings are in month of November. There is a scope of off season vegetables in the watershed.
C. Priority ranking of sectors (in next 5-10 years) (FOCUSSED GROUP DISCUSSION) Drinking Sector type Agriculture AH Education Forestry Hort. Water Health Drinking water Agriculture e.g. AH Health Animal Husbandry Education Forestry(NTFP) Horticulture
81
3 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
3. Identification of hazards a. Hazard trend analysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Risk of Intensity/sev Frequency Overall rating hazard erity of of hazard of hazard Year Climate events in happening hazard in the past multiplication of Hazard type the region that again Ranking (0- Ranking of event lead to hazard Ranking (0- nil, 5 very (1- low, 4 columns(4*5* nil, 5 very high) very high) 6) high Late & Less 1966 4 1 2 8 Drought Rainfall 1971 Wild Animal Deforestation & 1 2 1 Attack Less rainfall 1972 Wild Animal Deforestation & 1 2 1 Attack Less rainfall 1976 Land Slide Heavy Rainfall 2 1 2 4 1985 Flash Flood Heavy Rainfall 4 3 1 2010 Diarrhoea Conti.Rain 2 3 3 18 HudHud High Wind, 2014 4 2 1 8 cyclone Heavy Rainfall 2015 Pest (S.B) Cloudy weather 3 4 3 36 Diseases(A.H 2016 3 2 4 24 ) Heavy Rain
Observation on the frequency and severity of climate hazards and changing pattern of impact (specially seasonal calendar of livelihood operations, crops, water availability, pests, diseases) including socio- economic changes in the past.
The incidence of pest attack in 2015 due to cloudy weather is the worst hazard the community faced in the watershed. The diseases of the animals due to heavy rain in this year also have a serious problem and the incidence of diarrhoea in the community broke due to continuous rain. Heavy and continuous rainfall in the watershed causes various problems such as animal & human diseases, flash floods, land slide and pest attack etc. which leads to crop failure in the watersheds. b. Seasonal hazard calendar (SEASONALITY) S. N Fe Au Se No De o Hazards Jan b Mar Apr May Jun Jul g p Oct v c *** *** ** 1 Rainfall Measure - - * * ** *** ** ** * ** - - ** ** **
2 Mist ** * ------* ** Disease of *** ***
3 Domestic animal * * * ** ** **** ** * ** * ** ** 82 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Fodder scarcity 4 For domestic *** **** animals * * ** * * *** ------Water scarcity **** 5 for Human * * ** *** * **** ------**** *** 6 ailments * * * ** *** * * _* * * * * *** **** 7 Temperature ** *** * * *** ------**** *** 8 Festival * * * * ** *** ** * * * * * Women *** ** 9 Employment - - - * * **** ** *** - ** ** * *** ** 10 Migration ** - - * ** - - - - - ** ** Note: Number of stars will depict severity of hazard (1- minimum, 5 Maximum)
Observation of seasonal hazard calendar in the watersheds reveals that the incidences of animal diseases are more prominent in rainy seasons. The scarcity of fodder is also a problem during the months of late winter and summer. The watersheds get most of the rain in the month of July and August but there is also problem of water scarcity in June which hinders early agricultural operations and subsequently the crop period is extended. The extended crop period in this watershed also leads to attacks of wild animals. The incidence of migration is also prominent in winter season.
c.Priority ranking of climate hazards (in next 5-10 years)
Hazard type Drought Heavy Strong Wind Pest & F.C Rainfall Disease
Drought Heavy RainFall Strong Wind Pest & Disease Forest Conservation
Write hazards types along the first column and first row
In each blank cell compare the two hazards (column v/s row) and write the most critical
hazard. (also refer to column 7 of 3a) 83 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
If it is difficult to decide between tow hazard for the community as a whole decide on the hazard which most affects the vulnerable (disadvantages) community
Count the number of times each hazard has appeared in the blank cells. Most critical hazards will appear most number of times
d. Mapping of hazard
Map area prone natural and physical features of the watershed such as landslide prone zone, flood zone, zone exposed to high speed winds, diseases, pest attack etc., Zones that have faced hazards in the past Zones that are likely to face hazards in future due to extreme climate events Hazard free zones 4.4 Assessment of impact of hazard on resources Hazard Impact on Natural capital Impact on Physical capital rating Future expected hazard from Probability of Probability of type Nature of Nature of impact (H, M, impact (H, M, 3a impact impact L) L) Drought 8 Crop Failure M Food Insecurity M 36 Livestock Pest & Disease(A.H) &24 losses H Migration H Strong Wind 8 Crop Failour M Distress Sale M Diarrhoer 18 Stunted growth M M Flash Flood 12 Crop Failour M Distress Sale M Land Slide 4 Crop Failour L Distress Sale L Wild animal Attack 2 Life Loss L L As per the hazard rating the incidence of pest and diseases of Animals are most prominent in the watershed. The community suffers livestock losses drastically which ultimately compels for distress migration to outside the state.
5. Vulnerability assessment of social groups Flood and Drought Vulnerability ranking of social groups to climate hazards (Select most critical climate hazards – refer 3c) Social Groups Pest & Total Disease(A.H) Drought Diarrhoea
F N M VS F N M VS F N M VS VS 84
Income BPL Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Poor 3 4 3 36 3 4 2 24 2 3 2 12 72 Middle 2 4 3 24 3 3 2 18 3 1 2 6 48 Well off 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 6 1 2 2 4 12 Male 3 3 2 18 2 3 2 12 3 2 4 24 54 Gender Female 3 4 2 24 2 4 2 16 3 2 2 12 52 <18 2 2 3 12 2 4 2 16 3 2 2 12 40 Age group 18-60 3 3 2 18 2 3 2 12 3 2 3 18 48 >60 3 4 3 36 4 3 3 36 4 3 2 24 96 SC 2 2 3 12 2 3 3 18 3 2 3 18 48 Cast ST 3 4 2 24 3 3 3 27 4 3 2 24 75 OBC 3 3 2 18 2 3 3 18 3 3 1 9 45 Total vulnerability score 224 203 163 590
F - Frequency = Rating 0 -4 (0 -no occurrence, 1 – low occurrence, 2 – medium occurrence, 3 high occurrence, 4 – Very frequent occurrence) N – Number of people impacted = Rating 0-4 (0- no one impacted, 1- few, 2 – medium, 3- large, 4 – every one) M- Magnitude of impact/ damage = Rating 0-4 (0-no impact, 1- less impact, 2 – medium impact, 3- major impact, 4- large impact) VS- Vulnerability Score = F*N*M
We can conclude from the vulnerable assessment of different social groups present in the watershed that the poor income categories of people suffer from pest and diseases of animals, drought and diarrhoea among all other groups. In the study of gender in vulnerability assessment the females are more affected by different hazards than male. The ST categories of people are also more suffered from different climatologically hazards such as pest and diseases of animals, drought and diarrhoea. The overall vulnerability score is high in case of occurrences of animal diseases in the watershed area. a. Why some social groups are more vulnerable to any particular climate hazards? The poor communities are very less economic power to combat the incidence of pest and diseases and also diarrhoea. b. What impact is specific to most vulnerable group? Pest & diseases and drought are common to most vulnerable groups.
c. Is there intergroup dependence that determines vulnerability of specific vulnerable group? In some cases the inter group dependence also determine vulnerability as in some instances people of one group dependent on other groups to complete their farm works , the situation
arises when there is a delay in monsoon and water scarcity.
5. Vulnerability assessment of critical sectors 85 (Refer Para 2d for selection of critical sectors)
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Climate Hazards (Select most critical climate hazards) from 3c Disease & Drought Heavy Rain Fall Pest(A.H) Total VS F A M VS F A M VS F A M VS Rainfed 2 3 3 18 3 2 1 6 3 3 3 27 51 Irrigated 1 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Agriculture Rabi 2 2 2 8 3 2 3 18 1 2 1 2 28 Kharif 3 3 3 27 1 1 1 1 3 4 3 36 64 Animal Dairy 2 2 2 8 1 2 2 4 2 2 1 4 16 Husbandry Poultry 3 3 2 18 2 2 2 8 3 3 2 18 44 Agro-forestry 2 1 2 4 2 2 2 8 2 2 1 4 16 Private Forestry Plantations 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 4 3 1 2 6 12 Govt.forests 2 3 1 6 2 2 1 4 2 2 2 8 18 Fruits 2 2 3 12 3 2 2 12 1 2 3 6 30 Horticulture Vegetables 3 3 3 27 3 3 2 18 2 3 3 18 63 Floriculture 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 4 7 Total vulnerability score 135 85 133 353
F - Frequency = Rating 0-4 (0 -no occurrence, 1 – low occurrence, 2 – medium occurrence, 3 high occurrence, 4 – Very frequent occurrence) A - Area impacted = Rating 0-4 (0- no one impacted, 1- few, 2 – medium, 3- large, 4 – every one) M- Magnitude of impact/ damage = Rating 0-4 (0-no impact, 1- less impact, 2 – medium impact, 3- major impact, 4- large impact) VS- Vulnerability Score = F*A*M
The highlighted vulnerable score in each sector as well as total vulnerable scores in each sector implies how vulnerable the sector is towards the different climate hazards. Heavy rainfall and animal diseases are the major hazard as per the different farming options. From Agriculture sector Kharif crop is the most hazardous prone due to heavy rain and incidence of attack of pests & diseases. Rabi crop is also affected by drought .Poultry farming is also very risky due to heavy rain and attack of diseases.
Due to attack of pests, scarcity of water, and sometimes heavy rain damages the cultivation of vegetables, it is more risky among all other options under horticultural sector.
Similarly forest in the vicinity is also affected by the climatic hazard as opine by the villagers of the watershed.
Observation
a. Why some sectors are more vulnerable to any particular climate hazards
The most of the on-farm sectors depends on the climate or onset of monsoon for its survival
and productivity. The seasonal variability discussed above shaded as max vulnerable scores 86
leads to failure of particular sector. Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
b. What impact are specific to most vulnerable sectors
Heavy rainfall and pest and diseases are the specific to most vulnerable sectors. c. Are there any difference in the resources (natural capital, available to vulnerable sectors Yes, there is difference in the resources available to vulnerable sectors in some cases their accessibility. b. Are there inter-sector dependence that determine vulnerability of specific vulnerable sector. Yes, the inter sector dependence also determine the vulnerability of specific sector.
87 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
6. Assessment of resilience capacity of vulnerable social group/ community (Refer para 6 for identification of vulnerable social groups) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Types of livelihood 4)- Types of livelihood resources available Vulner resources affected (1severityof 4)- 5)columnin cope with impacts able 4)- Rating3and (1frequen ratingbymu 4)- 9)and87,colum )3cparafromhaz 4)- social (1Rating 2columnon cyofRatin ltiplied4col (1Ratingr 4)- nof(Averageca ards(criticaltype (1Rating.of group .affected basedseveri geventsha umnin(ratin esourcese 4)- (1Ratingcapi pacityresilience HazardClimate capitalphysi type capitalna tyimpactec zardofFre g4X5RiskT conomico (1Ratingcapi talinstitution Total calofExtent turalofE onomic- quency otal fAvailabil talhumanofA al andsocialofAva affected xtent Socio ity vailability ilability Pest & Diseases 3 3 3 3 9 2 2 1 1.6 Poor Drought 3 3 2 3 6 2 2 1 1.6 Heavy Rain Fall 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 1 1.6 Pest & Diseases 2 2 2 2 4 3 2 2 2.3 Middle Drought 2 2 2 3 6 3 2 2 2.3 Heavy Rain Fall 2 2 2 3 6 3 2 2 2.3 Pest & Diseases 3 1 2 1 2 4 3 3 3.3 welloff Drought 2 1 2 3 6 4 3 3 3.3 Heavy Rain Fall 2 1 2 2 4 3 2 3 2.66 Pest & Diseases 2 2 2 2 4 3 3 3 2.6 Male Drought 2 3 2 3 6 3 2 3 2.66 Heavy Rain Fall 2 2 3 2 6 3 3 2 2.6 Pest & Diseases 3 2 3 2 6 3 2 1 2 Female Drought 3 2 3 3 9 2 2 1 1.6 Heavy Rain Fall 3 2 3 3 9 2 2 2 2
Rating methods Column 2, 3, 4 1-low effect, 2- moderate effect, 3 – severe effect, 4- very severe effect Column 5 1- low frequency, 2 – moderate frequency, 3- High frequency Column 7, 8. 9 1- No availability, 2, medium availability, 3 – availability, 4 – Very high availability
88
3 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
7. Assessment of resilience capacity of vulnerable critical sectors (Refer Para 6 and 2d for identification of vulnerable critical sectors) Vulnerable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4)(1severityo 4)(1frequ 5)columninrat Types of Types of fRating3and2 encyofRa ingbymultipli Livelihood Critical )3cfromhazards Livelihoo columnonbas tingevent ed4columnin( Resources 9)and87,columnof(Averagecapacity Sector (criticaltypeHa d edseverityim shazardof rating4X5Ris available to resilienceTotal Type zardClimate Resources pacteconomic Frequenc kTotal cope with affected -Socio y impacts Pest & Diseases 3 2 3 3 9 3 2 2 2.33 Agriculture Drought 2 3 2 2 4 2 2 2 2 Heavy Rain Fall 3 2 3 2 6 2 2 2 2 Pest & Diseases 2 3 3 3 9 3 3 2 2.66 Animal Husbandry Drought 3 2 2 3 6 2 2 3 2.33 Heavy Rain Fall 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2
Rating methods Column 2, 3, 4 1-low effect, 2- moderate effect, 3 – severe effect, 4- very severe effect Column 5 1- low frequency, 2 – moderate frequency, 3- High frequency Column 7, 1- No availability, 2, medium availability, 3 – availability, 4 – Very high 8. 9 availability
Well off income category are more resilient towards different hazards such as pest & diseases, heavy rain & drought than middle and poor income categories. But the wells off category households are less resilient towards high rainfall. The poor income households are more suffered due to attack of pest & diseases than middle category as they are prone to hazards like drought and heavy rainfall. Drought is also a major hazard
to well off among all other hazards. Males are more resilient towards different hazards than their female counterparts.
In agricultural sector the pest and diseases are more resilient capacity than drought and heavy rain though it is also the most risk hazards. In case 89
of animal husbandry sector the animal diseases are the highest risky hazard but people are also more resilient towards it.
3 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
8. Assessment of coping and adaptation strategies Name of the sector: Agriculture Resource Sustainability Adoption Duration requirement and Severity Suggested by of strategy (Natural, effectiveness of impact Coping and sections of Critical Impact (short, Physical, of coping and (rating Adaptation communit Hazards s medium human, adaptation 01-05- Strategies y (few, or long economic/finan Rating (1-low 2016 (CAS) medium, term) cial, to 5- very large) institutional) high) Regular Monitoring Long Term Human Medium 3 Adoption of Crop IPM Pest & Long Human,Fincial,P Damag 3 methods Term hysical Medium 3 Diseases e Use of Medium Disease Fincial, resistant Institutional,Phy variety Medium . 3 Rain water Water Harvesting Long Term Natural,Human Medium 3 Drought Scarcit 4 Insitu Natural,Phy,Fin, y Conservatio Long Human,Instituti n measure Term onal Medium 2 CCT,SCT,B Soil Physical,Fincial ench Erosio ,Human,Instituti Heavy Terrace Long Term onal Large 2 n & 4 Rainfall Physical,Fincial Crop Contour ,Human,Instituti Loss Bonds Long Term onal Large 3
Regular monitoring, adoption of IPM are the long-term strategy and diseases resistant variety is the medium term strategy to mitigate the effects of pest & diseases. 90
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
Drought and heavy rain are the severe hazards in the watersheds. To combat water scarcity due to drought rain water conservation and in-situ soil moisture conservation should be suitable as a long term solution for this. Different types of soil and water conservation structures have in created in the watershed interventions but these are not sufficient to tackle the issue of water scarcity in the watershed due to increase in climate hazards day by day.
Soil and crop loss is also prevalent due to heavy rain in the watershed though different works have already taken in previous watershed project as well as convergence with other programme. The requisite of different soil conservation structures for catchment treatment such as continuous contour trench (CCT), contour bunds, bench terracing and staggered contour trench (SCT) can be understood. These can be implemented as a long term solution for combating soil & crop loss.
09. Adaptation partnership
Potential adaptation Role of institution Nature of Action by the community to seek Institution support and sector of and its effectiveness partnership support (partnership prerequisites) support
AWC
School
Farmers Club
SHG 91
Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
10. Selection of activities / investments for CC adaptation
Adaptation Location of Prioritisation criteria used by the community (Ranking (1-5) When Help from Responsibility priorities investments Cost Impact handling effectiveness Feasibility capacity Av. Rating Short Term Adaptation Priorities 1 2 3 Long Term Adaptation Priorities 1 2 3 4
92 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
ANNEX 6: PROGRESS REPORT AND FUND UTILISATION REPORT Sanctioned Amount received Source of Funds New Modified Amount SN Particulars New Av. No. of Av. Cost Total Community* Units Units Cost of Re- of NABARD (min.16% Other utilised Units cost Total completed completed new designed redesigned assistance unskilled sources unit units units labour) 1 Preparation of DPR 0 0 1 1.25 1.25 1.25 0 0 1.25 1.25 0 1 Soil and water 2 conservation (ha.) 0 0 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 2.00 0 14.5 0 0 0 3 Soil Health improvement and productivity enhancement (ha.) 0 0 1 7.5 7.5 7.5 1.42 0 8.92 0 0 0 4 Sustainable NRM and climate resilient farming, livelihood and food security 0 0 1 10.5 10.5 10.5 2.1 0 12.6 0 0 0 Mitigation of CC risk 5 (no.) 0 0 1 2.5 2.5 2.5 0.5 0 3.0 0 0 0 6 Capacity building, Institutional development and knowledge management 0 0 1 2.5 2.5 2.5 0.5 0 3.0 0 0 0 Management and 7 supervision cost 0 0 1 12 12 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 8 Watershed level Knowledge Management
(Weather Station)
0 0 1 1.25 1.25 1.25 0 0 1.25 0 0 0 3
TOTAL 50 50 50 6.52 0 56.5 1.25 0 1 9
3 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
94
3 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
95 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
96 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
97
3 Page
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT ON CLIMATE PROOFING LAVS
98
Page