DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2007.14282V2 [Nucl-Th] 13 Apr 2021 and Isospin Degrees of Freedom to Treat Larger Nuclei and Exponentially Scaling Challenge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2007.14282V2 [Nucl-Th] 13 Apr 2021 and Isospin Degrees of Freedom to Treat Larger Nuclei and Exponentially Scaling Challenge Variational Monte Carlo calculations of A ≤ 4 nuclei with an artificial neural-network correlator ansatz Corey Adams,1, 2 Giuseppe Carleo,3 Alessandro Lovato,1, 4 and Noemi Rocco4, 5 1Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 2Leadership Computing Facility, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439 3Institute of Physics, Ecole´ Polytechnique F´ed´erale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland 4INFN-TIFPA Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications, 38123 Trento, Italy 5Theoretical Physics Department, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA (Dated: April 15, 2021) The complexity of many-body quantum wave functions is a central aspect of several fields of physics and chemistry where non-perturbative interactions are prominent. Artificial neural net- works (ANNs) have proven to be a flexible tool to approximate quantum many-body states in con- densed matter and chemistry problems. In this work we introduce a neural-network quantum state ansatz to model the ground-state wave function of light nuclei, and approximately solve the nuclear many-body Schr¨odinger equation. Using efficient stochastic sampling and optimization schemes, our approach extends pioneering applications of ANNs in the field, which present exponentially-scaling algorithmic complexity. We compute the binding energies and point-nucleon densities of A ≤ 4 nuclei as emerging from a leading-order pionless effective field theory Hamiltonian. We successfully benchmark the ANN wave function against more conventional parametrizations based on two- and three-body Jastrow functions, and virtually-exact Green's function Monte Carlo results. PACS numbers: 21.60.De, 25.30.Pt Introduction { The last two decades have witnessed re- plex high-dimensional functions, as already leveraged in markable progress in our understanding of how the struc- several domains of physics [14]. For many-body quan- ture and dynamics of atomic nuclei emerge from the in- tum applications, neural-network-based variational rep- dividual interaction among protons and neutrons. This resentations have been introduced in Ref. [15], and have progress has been primarily driven by the widespread found applications as a tool to study ground state and use of nuclear-effective field theories to systematically dynamics of several interacting lattice quantum systems construct realistic Hamiltonians [1{3], and the concur- [16{24]. In a series of recent works [25{27] deep neural rent development of nuclear many-body techniques that networks have been further developed to tackle ab-initio solve the time-independent Schr¨odingerequation with chemistry problems within variational Monte Carlo, of- controlled approximations [4{8]. The variational Monte ten resulting in accuracy improvements over existing vari- Carlo (VMC) and the Green's Function Monte Carlo ational approaches traditionally used to describe corre- (GFMC) methods are ideally suited to tackle this prob- lated molecules. While applications of ML approaches to lem and have been extensively applied to study properties the many-body problem in condensed matter, quantum of light nuclei [9]. Monte Carlo techniques also face im- chemistry, and quantum information have been prolifer- portant challenges. For example, the calculation of the ating in the past few years, the adoption in low-energy spin-isospin dependent Jastrow correlations used in the nuclear theory is still in its infancy [28, 29]. Pioneering VMC and GFMC scales exponentially with the number work in the field [30] has provided a proof-of-principle of nucleons, limiting the applicability of these methods to application of ANN to solve the Schr¨odingerequation of relatively small nuclear systems. Also, the auxiliary-field the deuteron. Extending the non-stochastic approach of diffusion Monte Carlo [10] (AFDMC) samples the spin Ref. [30] to larger nuclei however presents an intrinsically arXiv:2007.14282v2 [nucl-th] 13 Apr 2021 and isospin degrees of freedom to treat larger nuclei and exponentially scaling challenge. infinite nucleonic matter [11, 12], but it can only take In this work, we expand the domain of applicabil- as inputs somewhat simplified interactions [13]. In ad- ity of ANN-based representations of the wave function dition, the use of wave functions that scale polynomially and compute ground-state properties of A ≤ 4 nuclei as with the number of nucleons exacerbates the AFDMC they emerge from a leading-order pionless effective field fermion sign problem for A > 16 nuclei. Therefore, ex- theory (EFT) Hamiltonian, containing consistent two- tending VMC and GFMC calculations to medium-mass and three-body potentials. Specifically, we develop a nuclei requires devising accurate wave functions that ex- novel VMC algorithm based on an ANN representation hibit a polynomial scaling with A. of the spin-isospin dependent correlator that captures the An alternative class of approaches being actively ex- vast majority of nuclear correlations and scales favorably plored is based on machine learning (ML) techniques. with the number of nucleons. We benchmark our results These techniques typically rely on the ability of artifi- against a more conventional parametrization of the varia- cial neural networks (ANNs) to compactly represent com- tional wave function in terms of two- and three-body Jas- 2 z z trow functions, and virtually-exact GFMC calculations. si = fsi ; ti g, respectively. For the s-shell nuclei consid- Hamiltonian.- We employ nuclear Hamiltonians de- ered in this work, we take jΦ2Hi = Aj "p"ni, jΦ3Hei = rived within pionless EFT, which is based on the tenet Aj "p#p"ni, and jΦ4Hei = Aj "p#p"n#ni, with A being that the typical momentum of nucleons in nuclei is much the anti-symmetrization operator [37]. smaller than the pion mass mπ [3, 31]. Under this as- The real-valued correlating factors U(r1;:::; rA) and sumption, largely justified for studying the structure and and V(s1; r1;:::; rA; sA) are parametrized in terms of long-range properties of A ≤ 4 nuclei, pion exchanges permutation-invariant ANNs, so that the total wave func- are unresolved contact interactions and nucleons are the tion is anti-symmetric. To achieve this goal, we make use only relevant degrees of freedom. The singularities of of the Deep Sets architecture [38, 39], and map each of the contact terms are controlled introducing a Gaussian the single-particle inputs separately to a latent-space rep- regulator that suppresses transferred momenta above the resentation. We then apply a sum operation to destroy ultraviolet cutoff Λ. This regulator choice directly leads the ordering of the information and ensure permutation to a Gaussian radial dependence of the potential, which invariance is local in coordinate [32, 33]. The leading-order (LO) ! Hamiltonian reads X F(x1;:::; xA) = ρF φF (xi) F = U; V : (4) ~ 2 xi X ri X −r2 Λ2=4 HLO = − + (C1 + C2 ~σi · ~σj) e ij 2mN i i<j Both φU and ρU are represented by ANNs comprised of X X −(r2 +r2 )Λ2=4 four fully connected layers with 32 nodes each, while φV + D0 e ik ij ; (1) and ρV are made of two fully connected layers, again cyc i<j<k with 32 nodes, for total of 13058 trainable parameters. The calculation of the kinetic energy requires using dif- where mN is the mass of the nucleon, ~σi is the Pauli P ferentiable activation functions. We find that tanh and matrix acting on nucleon i, and cyc stands for the cyclic permutation of i, j, and k. softplus [40] yield fully consistent results. The single- particle inputs are xi ≡ f¯rig and xi ≡ f¯ri; sig for U and Following Ref. [34], the low-energy constants C1 and V, respectively, where we defined intrinsic spatial coor- C2 are fit to the deuteron binding energy and to the neutron-neutron scattering length. In Eq. (1) we picked dinates as ¯ri = ri − RCM, with RCM being the center of mass coordinate. This procedure automatically re- the operator basis 1 and ~σi · ~σj, but this choice can be replaced by any other form equivalent under Fierz trans- moves spurious center of mass contributions from all ob- formations in SU(2). Solving A ≥ 3 nuclei with purely servables [41]. Since the parameters of the network are attractive two-nucleon potentials leads to the \Thomas randomly initialized, in the initial phases of the training, collapse" [35], which can be avoided promoting a contact during the Metropolis walk, the nucleons can drift away three-nucleon force to LO [36]. The values of the LECs' from RCM. To control this behavior, a Gaussian function adopted in this work can be found in Ref. [34]; since is added to confine the nucleons within a finite volume P 2 U(r1;:::; rA) !U(r1;:::; rA) − α ¯r where we take C1(Λ) is much larger than C2(Λ), the LO Hamiltonian i i has an approximate SU(4) symmetry. α = 0:05. Variational wave function.- A fundamental ingredi- The choice of correcting a mean-field state jΦi with ent of the VMC method is the choice of a suitable vari- a flexible ANN correlator factor is similar in spirit to neural-network correlators introduced recently in ational wave function ΨV , whose parameters are found exploiting the variational principle condensed-matter [16, 24] and chemistry applications [26], but it is more general as it encompasses spin-isospin hΨV jHjΨV i dependent correlations. An appealing feature of the ANN = EV ≥ E0 (2) hΨV jΨV i ansatz is that it is more general than the more conven- tional product of two- and three-body spin-independent where E0 is exact the ground-state energy: HjΨ0i = Jastrow functions E0jΨ0i. The Metropolis Monte Carlo algorithm is used J Y X Y to evaluate the variational energy EV by sampling the jΨV i = 1 − u(rij)u(rjk) f(rij)jΦi ; (5) spatial and spin-isospin coordinates. We introduce i<j<k cyc i<j the following ANN representation of the variational wave function which is commonly used for nuclear Hamiltonians that do not contain tensor and spin-orbit terms [33, 42].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Overview of Quantum Monte Carlo Methods David M. Ceperley
    An Overview of Quantum Monte Carlo Methods David M. Ceperley Department of Physics and National Center for Supercomputing Applications University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois 61801 In this brief article, I introduce the various types of quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods, in particular, those that are applicable to systems in extreme regimes of temperature and pressure. We give references to longer articles where detailed discussion of applications and algorithms appear. MOTIVATION One does QMC for the same reason as one does classical simulations; there is no other method able to treat exactly the quantum many-body problem aside from the direct simulation method where electrons and ions are directly represented as particles, instead of as a “fluid” as is done in mean-field based methods. However, quantum systems are more difficult than classical systems because one does not know the distribution to be sampled, it must be solved for. In fact, it is not known today which quantum problems can be “solved” with simulation on a classical computer in a reasonable amount of computer time. One knows that certain systems, such as most quantum many-body systems in 1D and most bosonic systems are amenable to solution with Monte Carlo methods, however, the “sign problem” prevents making the same statement for systems with electrons in 3D. Some limitations or approximations are needed in practice. On the other hand, in contrast to simulation of classical systems, one does know the Hamiltonian exactly: namely charged particles interacting with a Coulomb potential. Given sufficient computer resources, the results can be of quite high quality and for systems where there is little reliable experimental data.
    [Show full text]
  • Variational Monte Carlo Technique Ground State Energies of Quantum Mechanical Systems
    GENERAL ⎜ ARTICLE Variational Monte Carlo Technique Ground State Energies of Quantum Mechanical Systems Sukanta Deb In this article, I discuss the use of the Variational Monte Carlo technique in the determination of ground state energies of quantum harmonic os- cillators in one and three dimensions. In order to provide a better understanding of this technique, a pre-requisite concept of Monte Carlo integra- Sukanta Deb is an tion is also discussed along with numerical ex- Assistant Professor in the amples. The technique can be easily extended Department of Physics at Acharya Narendra Dev to study the ground state energies of hydrogen College (University of atom, particle in a box, helium atom and other Delhi). His research complex microscopic systems involving N parti- interests include astro- cles in d-dimensions. nomical photometry and spectroscopy, light curve 1. Introduction modeling in astronomy and astrophysics, Monte Carlo There exist many problems in science and engineering methods and simulations whose exact solution either does not exist or is difficult and automated data to find. For the solutions of those problems, one has to analysis. resort to approximate methods. In the context of quan- tum mechanics, the exact solutions of the Schr¨odinger’s equation exist only for a few idealized systems. There are varieties of systems for which the Schr¨odinger’s equa- tion either cannot be solved exactly or it involves very lengthy and cumbersome calculations [1]. For example, solving the Schr¨odinger equation to study the proper- ties of a system with hundreds or thousands of particles often turns out to be impractical [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Unifying Cps Nqs
    Citation for published version: Clark, SR 2018, 'Unifying Neural-network Quantum States and Correlator Product States via Tensor Networks', Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 51, no. 13, 135301. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751- 8121/aaaaf2 DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/aaaaf2 Publication date: 2018 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication This is an author-created, in-copyedited version of an article published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. IOP Publishing Ltd is not responsible for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or any version derived from it. The Version of Record is available online at http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1751-8121/aaaaf2/meta University of Bath Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 Unifying Neural-network Quantum States and Correlator Product States via Tensor Networks Stephen R Clarkyz yDepartment of Physics, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K. zMax Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, University of Hamburg CFEL, Hamburg, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Abstract.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1902.04057V3 [Cond-Mat.Dis-Nn] 19 Jan 2020 Statistical Mechanics Applications [16], As Well As Den- Spin Systems [13]
    Deep autoregressive models for the efficient variational simulation of many-body quantum systems 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, Or Sharir, ∗ Yoav Levine, † Noam Wies, ‡ Giuseppe Carleo, § and Amnon Shashua ¶ 1The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 9190401, Israel 2Center for Computational Quantum Physics, Flatiron Institute, 162 5th Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA Artificial Neural Networks were recently shown to be an efficient representation of highly-entangled many-body quantum states. In practical applications, neural-network states inherit numerical schemes used in Variational Monte Carlo, most notably the use of Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) sampling to estimate quantum expectations. The local stochastic sampling in MCMC caps the potential advantages of neural networks in two ways: (i) Its intrinsic computational cost sets stringent practical limits on the width and depth of the networks, and therefore limits their expressive capacity; (ii) Its difficulty in generating precise and uncorrelated samples can result in estimations of observables that are very far from their true value. Inspired by the state-of-the-art generative models used in machine learning, we propose a specialized Neural Network architecture that supports efficient and exact sampling, completely circumventing the need for Markov Chain sampling. We demonstrate our approach for two-dimensional interacting spin models, showcas- ing the ability to obtain accurate results on larger system sizes than those currently accessible to neural-network quantum states. Introduction.– The theoretical understanding and been limited to relatively shallow architectures, far from modeling of interacting many-body quantum matter rep- the very deep networks used in modern machine learn- resents an outstanding challenge since the early days of ing applications.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Quantum Monte Carlo
    An introduction to Quantum Monte Carlo Jose Guilherme Vilhena Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Condensée et Nanostructures, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 Outline 1) Quantum many body problem; 2) Metropolis Algorithm; 3) Statistical foundations of Monte Carlo methods; 4) Quantum Monte Carlo methods ; 4.1) Overview; 4.2) Variational Quantum Monte Carlo; 4.3) Diffusion Quantum Monte Carlo; 4.4) Typical QMC calculation; Outline 1) Quantum many body problem; 2) Metropolis Algorithm; 3) Statistical foundations of Monte Carlo methods; 4) Quantum Monte Carlo methods ; 4.1) Overview; 4.2) Variational Quantum Monte Carlo; 4.3) Diffusion Quantum Monte Carlo; 4.4) Typical QMC calculation; 1 - Quantum many body problem Consider of N electrons. Since m <<M , to a good e N approximation, the electronic dynamics is governed by : Z Z 1 2 1 H =− ∑ ∇ i −∑∑ ∑∑ 2 i i ∣r i−d∣ 2 i j ≠i ∣ri−r j∣ which is the Born Oppenheimer Hamiltonian. We want to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectos of this hamiltonian, i.e. : H r1, r 2,. ..,r N =E r 1, r2,. ..,r N QMC allow us to solve numerically this, thus providing E0 and Ψ . 0 1 - Quantum many body problem Consider of N electrons. Since m <<M , to a good e N approximation, the elotonic dynamics is governed by : Z Z 1 2 1 H =− ∑ ∇ i −∑∑ ∑∑ 2 i i ∣r i−d∣ 2 i j ≠i ∣ri−r j∣ which is the Born Oppenheimer Hamiltonian. We want to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectos of this hamiltonian, i.e. : H r1, r 2,.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Bath
    Citation for published version: Clark, SR 2018, 'Unifying Neural-network Quantum States and Correlator Product States via Tensor Networks', Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, vol. 51, no. 13, 135301. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751- 8121/aaaaf2 DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/aaaaf2 Publication date: 2018 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication This is an author-created, in-copyedited version of an article published in Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. IOP Publishing Ltd is not responsible for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or any version derived from it. The Version of Record is available online at http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1751-8121/aaaaf2/meta University of Bath General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 23. May. 2019 Unifying Neural-network Quantum States and Correlator Product States via Tensor Networks Stephen R Clarkyz yDepartment of Physics, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K. zMax Planck Institute for the Structure and Dynamics of Matter, University of Hamburg CFEL, Hamburg, Germany E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Correlator product states (CPS) are a powerful and very broad class of states for quantum lattice systems whose (unnormalised) amplitudes in a fixed basis can be sampled exactly and efficiently.
    [Show full text]
  • Variational Monte Carlo Method for Fermions
    Variational Monte Carlo Method for Fermions Vijay B. Shenoy [email protected] Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore December 26, 2009 1/91 Acknowledgements Sandeep Pathak Department of Science and Technology 2/91 Plan of the Lectures on Variational Monte Carlo Method Motivation, Overview and Key Ideas Details of VMC Application to Superconductivity 3/91 The Strongly Correlated Panorama... Fig. 1. Phase diagrams ofrepresentativemateri- als of the strongly cor- related electron family (notations are standard and details can be found in the original refer- ences). (A) Temperature versus hole density phase diagram of bilayer man- ganites (74), including several types of antiferro- magnetic (AF) phases, a ferromagnetic (FM) phase, and even a glob- ally disordered region at x 0 0.75. (B) Generic phase diagram for HTSC. SG stands for spin glass. (C) Phase diagram of single layered ruthenates (75, 76), evolving from a superconducting (SC) state at x 0 2 to an AF insulator at x 0 0(x controls the bandwidth rather than the carrier density). Ruthenates are believed to be clean metals at least at large x, thus providing a family of oxides where competition and com- plexity can be studied with less quenched dis- order than in Mn ox- ides. (D) Phase diagram of Co oxides (77), with SC, charge-ordered (CO), and magnetic regimes. (E) Phase diagram of the organic k-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl salt (57). The hatched re- gion denotes the co- existence of metal and insulator phases. (F) Schematic phase dia- gram of the Ce-based heavy fermion materials (51).
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations: from Few to Many Species
    Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations: From Few to Many Species by William Gary Dawkins A Thesis Presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Physics Guelph, Ontario, Canada c William Gary Dawkins, May, 2019 ABSTRACT QUANTUM MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS: FROM FEW TO MANY SPECIES William Gary Dawkins Advisor: University of Guelph, 2019 Professor Alexandros Gezerlis We study systems of particles with varying numbers of distinguishable species ranging from 4-species to the N-species limit, where N is the number of particles in the system itself. We examine these systems using various powerful simulation techniques that belong to the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) family. The N-species limit is studied via Path Integral Monte Carlo (PIMC), which is a finite temperature, non- perturbative technique. At this limit, we explore the viability of two different thermal density matrices for systems that interact via hard-sphere, hard-cavity potentials. We then study the impact of finite-size effects on calculations of the energy, pressure and specific heat of the system when reaching the thermodynamic limit under periodic boundary conditions. We then move to studying a 4-species fermionic system using Variational Monte Carlo (VMC) and Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC), which are ground state techniques. We apply these methods to the clustering problem of 4-particle and 8-particle systems. While the 4-particle, 4-species system is relatively simple to calculate as it is physically identical to a bosonic system of 4-particles, the 8-particle fermi system is more complicated. We detail the process of simulating a bound 8- particle state with respect to decay into two independent 4-particle clusters with DMC for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Learning-Enhanced Variational Monte Carlo Method for Quantum Many-Body Physics
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH 2, 012039(R) (2020) Rapid Communications Deep learning-enhanced variational Monte Carlo method for quantum many-body physics Li Yang ,1,* Zhaoqi Leng,2 Guangyuan Yu,3 Ankit Patel,4,5 Wen-Jun Hu,1,† and Han Pu1,‡ 1Department of Physics and Astronomy & Rice Center for Quantum Materials, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA 2Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA 3Department of Physics and Astronomy & The Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA 4Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA 5Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA (Received 26 May 2019; accepted 12 December 2019; published 14 February 2020) Artificial neural networks have been successfully incorporated into the variational Monte Carlo method (VMC) to study quantum many-body systems. However, there have been few systematic studies exploring quantum many-body physics using deep neural networks (DNNs), despite the tremendous success enjoyed by DNNs in many other areas in recent years. One main challenge of implementing DNNs in VMC is the inefficiency of optimizing such networks with a large number of parameters. We introduce an importance sampling gradient optimization (ISGO) algorithm, which significantly improves the computational speed of training DNNs by VMC. We design an efficient convolutional DNN architecture to compute the ground state of a one-dimensional SU(N) spin chain. Our numerical results of the ground-state energies with up to 16 layers of DNNs show excellent agreement with the Bethe ansatz exact solution. Furthermore, we also calculate the loop correlation function using the wave function obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Variational Quantum Monte Carlo Abstract Introduction
    Variational Quantum Monte Carlo Josh Jiang, The University of Chicago > (1.1) Abstract The many electron system is one that quantum mechanics have no exact solution for because of the correlation between each electron with every other electron. Many methods have been developed to account for this correlation. One family of methods known as quantum Monte Carlo methods takes a numerical approach to solving the many-body problem. By employing a stochastic process to estimate the energy of a system, this method can be used to calculate the ground state energy of a system using the variational principle. The core of this method involves choosing an ansatz with a set of variational parameters that can be optimized to minimize the energy of the system. Recent research in this field is focused on developing methods to faster and more efficiently optimize this trial ansatz and also to make the ansatz more flexible by allowing more parameters. These topics along with the theory behind variational Monte Carlo (VMC) will be the subject of this Maple worksheet. Introduction Quantum mechanics is the study of particles at a very small scale. At this scale, particles can be characterized by wave functions and behave much differently than classical systems. By understanding how molecules behave at the quantum level, researchers can apply that knowledge to gain insights into how macroscopic systems work. While the applications are promising, quantum mechanics still struggles to understand the behavior of large atomic systems. For small, simple systems like particle in a box, harmonic oscillator, and the hydrogen atom, the Schrodinger equation: can be solved exactly, revealing the energy levels and exact wave functions for those systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Variational Monte Carlo Method for Fermions
    Variational Monte Carlo Method for Fermions Vijay B. Shenoy [email protected] Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore Mahabaleswar, December 2009 1/36 Acknowledgements Sandeep Pathak 2/36 Acknowledgements Sandeep Pathak Department of Science and Technology 2/36 Plan of the Lectures on Variational Monte Carlo Method Motivation, Overview and Key Ideas (Lecture 1, VBS) 3/36 Plan of the Lectures on Variational Monte Carlo Method Motivation, Overview and Key Ideas (Lecture 1, VBS) Details of VMC (Lecture 2, VBS) 3/36 Plan of the Lectures on Variational Monte Carlo Method Motivation, Overview and Key Ideas (Lecture 1, VBS) Details of VMC (Lecture 2, VBS) Application to Superconductivity (Lecture 3, VBS) 3/36 Plan of the Lectures on Variational Monte Carlo Method Motivation, Overview and Key Ideas (Lecture 1, VBS) Details of VMC (Lecture 2, VBS) Application to Superconductivity (Lecture 3, VBS) Application to Bosons (Lecture 4, AP) 3/36 Plan of the Lectures on Variational Monte Carlo Method Motivation, Overview and Key Ideas (Lecture 1, VBS) Details of VMC (Lecture 2, VBS) Application to Superconductivity (Lecture 3, VBS) Application to Bosons (Lecture 4, AP) Application to Spin Liquids (Lecture 5, AP) 3/36 The Strongly Correlated Panorama... Fig. 1. Phase diagrams ofrepresentativemateri- als of the strongly cor- related electron family (notations are standard and details can be found in the original refer- ences). (A) Temperature versus hole density phase diagram of bilayer man- ganites (74), including several types of antiferro- magnetic (AF) phases, a ferromagnetic (FM) phase, and even a glob- ally disordered region at x 0 0.75.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1807.10633V1 [Physics.Chem-Ph] 27 Jul 2018
    Improved speed and scaling in orbital space variational monte carlo Iliya Sabzevari1 and Sandeep Sharma1, ∗ 1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80302, USA In this work, we introduce three algorithmic improvements to reduce the cost and improve the scal- ing of orbital space variational Monte Carlo (VMC). First, we show that by appropriately screening the one- and two-electron integrals of the Hamiltonian one can improve the efficiency of the al- gorithm by several orders of magnitude. This improved efficiency comes with the added benefit that the resulting algorithm scales as the second power of the system size O(N 2), down from the fourth power O(N 4). Using numerical results, we demonstrate that the practical scaling obtained is in fact O(N 1:5) for a chain of Hydrogen atoms, and O(N 1:2) for the Hubbard model. Second, we introduce the use of the rejection-free continuous time Monte Carlo (CTMC) to sample the determinants. CTMC is usually prohibitively expensive because of the need to calculate a large number of intermediates. Here, we take advantage of the fact that these intermediates are already calculated during the evaluation of the local energy and consequently, just by storing them one can use the CTCM algorithm with virtually no overhead. Third, we show that by using the adaptive stochastic gradient descent algorithm called AMSGrad one can optimize the wavefunction energies robustly and efficiently. The combination of these three improvements allows us to calculate the ground state energy of a chain of 160 hydrogen atoms using a wavefunction containing ∼ 2 × 105 variational parameters with an accuracy of 1 mEh/particle at a cost of just 25 CPU hours, which when split over 2 nodes of 24 processors each amounts to only about half hour of wall time.
    [Show full text]