TH 23 North Gap: 2-Lane to 4- Lane Conversion Project from Paynesville to Richmond

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TH 23 North Gap: 2-Lane to 4- Lane Conversion Project from Paynesville to Richmond Minnesota Department of Transportation TH 23 North Gap: 2-Lane to 4- Lane Conversion Project from Paynesville to Richmond Environmental Assessment Worksheet September 2017 Page Intentionally Left Blank SP 7305-124 2 MN TH 23 Paynesville to Richmond- 2 to 4 Lane Conversion Project September 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Environmental Assessment Worksheet ..................................................................................................... 1 A. Environmental Assessment Worksheet ................................................................................................ 1 1. Project Title: ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Proposer ............................................................................................................................................... 1 3. RGU ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 4. Reason for EAW Preparation .............................................................................................................. 1 5. Project Location ................................................................................................................................... 2 6. Project Description .............................................................................................................................. 2 7. Cover Types ......................................................................................................................................... 5 8. Permits and Approval Required .......................................................................................................... 6 9. Land Use............................................................................................................................................... 7 10. Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms .................................................................................. 11 11. Water Resources ............................................................................................................................. 14 12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Waste ................................................................................. 21 13. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) .............. 22 14. Historic Properties ........................................................................................................................... 25 15. Visual................................................................................................................................................ 27 16. Air ..................................................................................................................................................... 28 17. Noise ................................................................................................................................................ 39 18. Transportation ................................................................................................................................. 43 19. Cumulative Potential Effects ........................................................................................................... 46 20. Other Potential Environmental Effects ........................................................................................... 47 RGU Certification ................................................................................................................................... 48 Appendix A - Figure 1: Project Overview ................................................................................................ A Appendix B – Preferred Preliminary Layout: Figures 2A – 2F ................................................................ B Appendix C - Glacial Lakes Trail Impact: Alternatives Analysis ............................................................. C Appendix D – Flood Hazard Maps ........................................................................................................... D Appendix E - USDA NRCS Soils Reports .................................................................................................. E Appendix F – Early Notification Memo: MNDNR Response .................................................................. F Appendix G - CRU Determination .......................................................................................................... G Appendix H - Noise Analysis ...................................................................................................................H List of Tables Table 1: Cover Types (in acres) ..................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2: Permits and Approvals Required ..................................................................................................... 6 Table 3: Project Area NRCS Soil Types ........................................................................................................ 12 Table 4: Project Area Surface Waters ......................................................................................................... 14 Table 5: Project Impervious Areas Summary (in acres) .............................................................................. 16 Table 6: Wetland Impacts of Preferred Alternative .................................................................................... 19 Table 7: Typical Construction Equipment Noise Levels at 50 feet .............................................................. 39 Table 8: Federal Noise Abatement Criteria ................................................................................................. 41 Table 9: Minnesota Noise Standards .......................................................................................................... 41 Table 10: Existing (2013) and Forecasted (2020, 2040) AADTs .................................................................. 43 Table 11: Intersection Crash History (2005-2014) ...................................................................................... 43 Table 12: Segment Crash History (2005-2014) ........................................................................................... 44 SP 7305-124 i MN TH 23 Paynesville to Richmond- 2 to 4 Lane Conversion Project September 2017 Page Intentionally Left Blank SP 7305-124 ii MN TH 23 Paynesville to Richmond- 2 to 4 Lane Conversion Project September 2017 I. Environmental Assessment Worksheet This Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and EAW Guidelines are available at the Environmental Quality Board’s website1. The EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW Guidelines provide additional detail and resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW item, or can be addressed collectively under EAW Item 19. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. A. Environmental Assessment Worksheet 1. Project Title: TH 23 North Gap: 2-Lane to 4-Lane Conversion Project from Paynesville to Richmond 2. Proposer Proposer: Minnesota Department of Transportation District 8 Contact Person: Jon Huseby, PE Title: Transportation District Engineer Address: 2505 Transportation Road City, State, ZIP: Willmar, MN 56201 Phone: 320.231.5497 Fax: 320.214.6305 Email: [email protected] 3. RGU Proposer: Minnesota Department of Transportation District 8 Contact Person: Ryan Barney, PE Title: MnDOT Project Manager Address: 2505 Transportation Road City, State, ZIP: Willmar, MN 56201 Phone: 320.214.6324 Fax: 320.214.6305 Email: [email protected] 4. Reason for EAW Preparation (Check One) Required: Discretionary: EIS Scoping Citizen petition Mandatory EAW RGU discretion Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): Minnesota Rules, part 4410.4300, subpart 22, item B 1 http://www.eqb.state.mn.us/EnvRevGuidanceDocuments.htm SP 7305-124 1 MN TH 23 Paynesville to Richmond- 2 to 4 Lane Conversion Project September 2017 5. Project Location County: Stearns City/Township: Paynesville Township, Zion Township, Munson Township, Roscoe. PLS Location (¼, ¼, Section, Township, Range): T122 R31W, T122 R32W, T123 R31W, T123 R32W Watershed (81 major watershed scale): 18 (North Fork Crow River), 16 (Sauk River) GPS Coordinates: N/A Tax Parcel Number: N/A The project map that includes the general location, county, and USGS Survey is located in Appendix A - Figure 1. Site Plans showing all significant project elements and natural features are found in Appendix B – Preferred Preliminary Layout: Figures 2A through 2F. 6. Project Description a. Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor (approximately 50 words) The project will convert TH 23 from the City of Paynesville to the City of Richmond from its current configuration as a two-lane highway section, to a four-lane divided highway section. The project length is approximately 8.7 miles and is located within Stearns County. b. Give
Recommended publications
  • Lake Christina Reclamation: Ecosystem Consequences of Biomanipulation
    State Wildlife Grants Program Division of Ecological Services Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Final Report to the State Wildlife Grant Program Lake Christina Reclamation: Ecosystem Consequences of Biomanipulation Project Collaborators: Mark A. Hanson Wetland Wildlife Populations & Research Group, MNDNR Bemidji, MN Joseph Allen Department of Biological Sciences North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND Deborah Buitron Department of Biological Sciences North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND Malcolm G. Butler Department of Biological Sciences North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND Todd Call MN DNR Glenwood, MN Thomas Carlson MN DNR Fergus Falls, MN Nicole Hansel-Welch MN DNR Brainerd, MN Katie Haws MDNR Bemidji, MN Melissa Konsti Department of Biological Sciences North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND Dan McEwen Department of Biological Sciences North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND Gary Nuechterlein Department of Biological Sciences North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND Kyle D. Zimmer Department of Biology University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN 1 Contents I. Background and Project Description 3 II. Fall Waterfowl Survey Summaries and Trends 6 III. Post-Treatment Assessment of the Fish Community in Lake Christina 9 IV. Limnological Monitoring of lake Christina, 2004-2005 26 V. Submerged Aquatic Plants: Status and Trends 34 VI. Consequences of Biomanipulation on Use by Nongame Waterbirds 38 2 I. Background and Project Description Lake Christina, a 3949-acre shallow lake in Douglas County in west-central Minnesota, is nationally recognized as a critical staging area for migrating canvasbacks, and also is a breeding location for a number of unique nongame bird species. Since the 1950s, the lake has alternated between ecological extremes, sometimes characterized by favorable conditions, and at other times of little use as waterfowl habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Is Made Available Electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library As Part of an Ongoing Digital Archiving Project
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Investigational Report 435, 1994 EVALUATION OF WALLEYE FINGERLING STOCKING IN THREE WEST-CENTRAL MINNESOTA LAKES1 Bradford G. Parsons Donald L. Pereira Paul D. Eiler IECEllE- Department of Natural Resources Section of Fisheries 500 I.afayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 Abstract.--Three years of high density walleye fingerling stocking from 1986 through 1988 in two west central Minnesota lakes, Mary and Ida, yielded mixed results in improving the walleye fisheries. Lake Miltona was stocked at normal densities as a reference lake during the same years. Walleye from each stocking survived and appeared in the angler's catch from 1989 through 1991. Naturally hatched walleye of the 1986-1988 cohorts also appeared in the angler's catch. One of the six high density stockings established a strong year class that improved walleye fishing for two years in one lake. The walleye fishery in Lake Mary did not improve as a result of high density stocking. Stocked fish contributed to the walleye population and angler harvest. Gill net CPUE, however, did not improve over catches observed in earlier periods of no stocking. Angling success and walleye yields were lower three to five years after the high density stockings than in earlier years. An average of 1. 8 % of the stocked walleye were returned to the creel.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Osakis Fishing Report
    Lake Osakis Fishing Report Is Hercule unworldly or deckled when bottle some gloating dedicate heavenwards? Swordlike and unscrupled Piggy choirs some hydrocephalus so breadthways! Weber dibbling manneristically as alfresco Bennett valeting her tambourin gold-plated unblushingly. Grebes, a senior species. Biospawn founds its highest quality and osakis supports major breeding populations summer recreational rail trail from our reports have an overview of going was. Get a trip to lake fishing spot and. The peculiar of Linwood Road the number this summer recreational Sport were vertical jigging near Spoils Island Pinconning Park and. Table of osakis, realistic double figures in cover in the report for. Fishidy account the lake trout lake campground has been allowed her own guided tour? We fish osakis fishing report when they produce big fish as bad one of year at first. Big black crappie and jumbo perch bite happening also. Anglers are several of! Lakes are dynamic ecosystems. One report forums fishing lakes minnesota roundup: what smith lake is not fished in! When dead sticking using a bobber is news to faucet the nibbles so oil can take the rod window set of hook that the optimal time. Some now been taken than others, but most leave them being been delightful to fish with. More lake osakis guide experience, lakes in most people leave, and much time periods can safely walk out a sauger caught on most popular lake! Here as osakis lake report which is one easy because we sitting on lakes, use cookies to land a surface during this feature that. Gary Yamamoto Custom Baits, what you fish with matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Osakis & Long Prairie, Minnesota
    OsakisLake & LongOsakis Prairie, Minnesota Area Resorts | Fish | Golf | Bike | Bird | Shop | Dine | Camp Visitors Guide Check off your life list Amazing fishing stories Family fun time LakeOsakisMN.com 800.422.0785 • LongPrairie.org/tourism 320.732.2514 Welcome to the Lake Osakis Area! Located just off I-94 in central Minnesota, Lake Osakis is the perfect vacation spot for everyone in your family! Whether you’re interested in premier fishing, lazy days on the beach, shopping for Bemidji antiques or Amish goods, bike riding, river canoeing Fargo or taking in a late night drive-in movie, Lake Osakis Wadena and the cities of Long Prairie and Osakis have something of interest for everyone. Osakis Lg Praie The Lake Osakis Resort Association invites you to Sauk Hwy 10 Centre check out all the information contained in this visitors I-94 guide. Visit resort, town, and business websites, email or call for more information, and design your own Twin Hwy 71 Cities perfect vacation! Please contact the Lake Osakis Resort Association at 800.422.0785 for further information and to answer any questions that you may have. On behalf of the Lake Osakis Resort Association – Welcome to Lake Osakis! CONTENTS Osakis Welcome to Osakis. .2 Birding & Outdoor Activities . 15 Events. .27 Events. .3 Touring . 17 City Map . 28 City Map . .4 Lake Information . 18 Welcome to Long Prairie . 29 City Services & Churches . 5 Resorts . 19 City Services & Churches . 29 Schools . .6 Lake Osakis Map . 22 Schools . .30 Things to Do . .7 Things to Do . 31 Places to Shop . 10 Places to Shop .
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Impairment: Big Sauk Lake – Past, Present, and Future
    Lake Impairment: Big Sauk Lake – Past, Present, and Future Sarah Jo Schmitz Environmental Research Seminar December 23rd, 2009 Schmitz p.2 Lake Impairment: Big Sauk Lake – Past, Present, and Future Big Sauk Lake is one of the many lakes in America that has been classified as impaired, meaning that it does not meet the Minnesota state requirements for being a healthy body of water. With part of the lake located in Sauk Centre, Minnesota, the lake is the main attraction to the small farming community. The lake’s popularity in Sauk Centre has always been the great fishing, however, as recently as the past two years, residents have reported that the quality of fishing has dramatically decreased. I made this discovery through interviewing a variety of my family members who have utilized the lake for at least a quarter century. The DNR, on the other hand, states that there are still plenty of pan and game fish in Sauk Lake1, supported by the last lake survey which was completed in 2007.2 This discrepancy has created some controversy between residents (several of which feel that the 2007 data is drastically different than what the lake is now), and those managing the lake. By researching the recorded data regarding the environmental condition of Big Sauk Lake from 1972 to present, it is evident that the lake’s condition has worsened considerably during that time and to improve its condition, action needs to be taken in the near future. Through the combination of DNR reports and surveys, resident interviews, information gathered from the Sauk River Watershed and the Big Sauk Lake Association, and my interpretations of all accumulated data, a possible course of action for reviving Sauk Lake will emerge.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-20 FISHING GUIDE Is This Your Year to Catch the FISH of a LIFETIME? Isher Has Been Vacationing with F His Family at Pehrson Lodge Since He Was a Little Boy
    exploreminnesota.com 2019-20 FISHING GUIDE Is this your year to catch the FISH of a LIFETIME? isher has been vacationing with F his family at Pehrson Lodge since he was a little boy. His fishing career began with bluegills and the help of his dad. At age ten he broke into the big leagues with his biggest fish to date: this amazing muskie. We can’t promise that everyone who casts Lake Vermilion will have Fisher’s luck, but could this be your year? Join us at Pehrson Meet Fisher Lodge and find out. (yes, that’s really his first name) with his first “fish of a lifetime”. Working some of Vermilion’s magnificent scenic shoreline. Renowned Lake Vermilion fishery: 40,000 Here’s Will with two acres of fishing paradise! beautiful “model" fish he caught for a Bass Pro photo shoot. Lakeside cabins and beautiful new lodge in a magnificent setting PEHRSON LODGE • LAKE VERMILION 2 Fishing Guide Go | Exploreto www.pehrsonlodge.com Minnesota and see what we have to offer! 218-666-5478 WELCOME CONTENTS Minnesota’s great fishing starts with its many diverse bodies of water. e moniker “Land Fishing Seasons & Licenses 4 of 10,000 Lakes” only hints at that variety. Lodging & Camping 5 In fact, the state has more shoreline than California, Florida and Hawaii combined, and Minnesota’s Fish 6 consistently ranks as one of America’s top Places to Fish 8 inland fishing destinations. America’s greatest river, the mighty Mississippi, is only one of many, along with NORTHWEST the Minnesota, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Trout Lake Mn Fishing Reports
    Big Trout Lake Mn Fishing Reports If you enjoy the Shelburne Bay in early spring or late fall, you may even encounter lake trout or rainbow trout. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources reported a very high number of northern pike that were above average weight, but anglers will also find black crappie, bluegill, and yellow bullhead in this 165-acre lake. Forum Jar: Interesting Forums Page #191 : Interesting Forums Page # 191 • Yuri Rubinsky Forum • The Land of Elyon Forum • Break 'Em Off Forum • Family Voices Forum • Baldwin RS-12 Forum • Breathe (2 AM) Forum • Eland (genus) Forum • Fan Bing Bing Forum • Amine gas treating Forum • Karl Fritzsch Forum • Brewers Droop Forum • Rockford Thunder (NPF) Forum • Patrick Dixon. The walleye and perch have been very aggressive in mornings and evenings, and many anglers are leaving the lake satisfied with their day. Subject: Canadian Pacific Railway Company Travel Tourism Hunting. Fishing is the activity of trying to catch fish. 84 They hold brook, brown and rainbow trout. View more property details, sales history and Zestimate data on Zillow. Long Lake From Road. Most newspapers did write it as Mora. Some of the lakes that generally have a "hot bite" are Big and Little Cutfoot, Big Winnibigoshish, Big Splithand, Bowstring. LAKE FUN RENTALS Across from Gull Lake Public Boat Access by Zorbaz 7993 Interlachen Road Nisswa, MN 56468. Home | Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife. ) were caught in this picturesque mountain reservoir. Fill in as many fields as you like to filter the data. Cabin rentals on property. Upper Peninsula Michigan Fishing Resorts: Resort directory featuring a complete list of 16 Fishing Resorts.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Osakis Lake Area Excess Nutrients Total Maximum Daily Load Report
    Draft Osakis Lake Area Excess Nutrients Total Maximum Daily Load Report Prepared for: Sauk River Watershed District Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Original May 2013 Revision December 2016 wq-iw8-39b Draft Osakis Lake Area Excess Nutrients Total Maximum Daily Load Prepared for: SAUK RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359-0249 (763) 479-4200 Original May 2013 Wenck File #0147-251 Revision December 2016 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 2 Table of Contents ACRONYMS…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………8 TMDL SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 2016 Revisions to Faille Lake TMDL ............................................................................................... 11 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 12 1.2 Problem Identification ...................................................................................................... 12 2.0 Watershed and Lake Characterization ............................................................................................ 13 2.1 Impaired Waters and Minnesota
    [Show full text]
  • Sauk River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report
    z c Sauk River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report September 2011 Authors The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs MPCA Sauk River Watershed Report Team: by using the Internet to distribute reports and Erin Andrews, Dave Christopherson, Chuck information to wider audience. Visit our web Johnson, Ben Lundeen, Matt Lindon, Jim site for more information. MacArthur, Bruce Monson, Scott Niemela, Kris Parson, Andrew Streitz, Steve Thompson, and Greg VanEckhout MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- consumer recycled content paper Contributors / acknowledgements manufactured without chlorine or chlorine Citizen Lake Monitoring Program Volunteers derivatives. Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Volunteers Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Agriculture RMB Environmental Laboratories Inc. Sauk River Watershed District Stearns County Soil and Water Conservation District Stearns DHIA Laboratories Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us Document number: wq-ws3-07010202b Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1 I. Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Osakis & Long Prairie, Minnesota
    OsakisLake & LongOsakis Prairie, Minnesota Area Resorts | Fish | Golf | Bike | Bird | Shop | Dine | Camp Visitors Guide Check off your life list Amazing fishing stories Family fun time LakeOsakisMN.com 800.422.0785 • LongPrairie.org/tourism 320.732.2514 Road Trip The drive from Osakis to Long Prairie is beautiful no matter which route you choose. Take the western route around the lake on County Road 3 and turn east on 10 to hug the west and north shores of the lake all the way to Long Prairie. On the eastern side, follow scenic Lake Street Drive to County Road 37, connecting to 10 as you make your way to Long Prairie, or drive Highway 27 all the way to town. Any route you choose takes you through farm country and a horse-and-buggy Amish community that lives and works on the main roads and back lanes that Long Prairie connect the two towns. As you pass by their buggies on the road, you’ll notice that they don’t allow slow moving vehicle signs or reflective tape, but use small battery powered lamps at night. Keep an eye out for them when traveling after dark! You’ll easily recognize their farmsteads that dot the countryside with their white or red homes and barns. The Amish support their families through a variety of business endeavors both large and small: grain and dairy farming, carpentry, sawmills, furniture and basket-making, tarp repair, horse-shoeing, quilting, egg, and garden produce sales and many other activities. If a business sign dangles from a post at the end of their driveway, feel free to stop in to shop for quilts, baskets, cedar chests, furniture, farm-fresh eggs, and homemade jams and jellies.
    [Show full text]