DOCSLIB.ORG

Study on Rohs and WEEE Directives - Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study on Rohs and WEEE Directives - Final Report Study on RoHS and WEEE Directives N° 30-CE-0095296/00-09 Final report European Commission DG Enterprise and industry 06/11925/AL March 2008 ARCADIS European Commission Sarah Bogaert Mike Van Acoleyen DG Enterprise and Industry Inge Van Tomme Lieven De Smet RPA Dave Fleet Rocio Salado ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We gratefully acknowledge funding of this study by the European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry. The comments made by DG ENT and DG ENV have been very useful during the drafting of this report. We would also like to thank the numerous individuals representing authorities, (sectoral or non- governmental) organisations and companies who dedicated time to active participation in the study. Our gratitude is also expressed to the participants to the Stakeholder Workshop of July 3, 2007 and those who helped preparing its practical organisation. The report does not necessarily represent the position and views of the European Commission. ARCADIS ECOLAS & RPA Content 06/11925 - a study on RoHS and WEEE directives - final report CONTENT CONTENT.................................................................................................................................... I LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................ IX LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... XI LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................XIII LIST OF ANNEXES ..................................................................................................................XIX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................................I 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Goals................................................................................................................................ 2 2 SCOPING OF THE STUDY ..................................................................................................3 2.1 Sector profile..................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Selection of Member States ................................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Selection criteria................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.2 Implementation systems in the selected MS ......................................................................... 7 2.2.2.1 Global parameters........................................................................................................................ 7 Import and export of EEE........................................................................................................... 7 Prevailing waste management practices ...................................................................................... 7 2.2.2.2 Belgium .................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.2.3 United Kingdom......................................................................................................................... 11 Approach................................................................................................................................ 11 Evaluation of first year’s enforcement activities .......................................................................... 13 2.2.2.4 Germany................................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2.5 Ireland...................................................................................................................................... 16 2.2.2.6 Lithuania................................................................................................................................... 17 COMPONENT 1: STUDY OF THE ROHS DIRECTIVE ..................................................................21 3 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................23 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS ............................................................................25 4.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 25 4.2 Selection of products........................................................................................................ 25 4.2.1 Selection criteria..............................................................................................................25 4.2.2 Product volumes of the selected products .......................................................................... 26 4.2.2.1 Refrigerators ............................................................................................................................. 27 4.2.2.2 PC and laptop, including spare parts............................................................................................28 4.2.2.3 Printers and copiers ................................................................................................................... 29 4.2.2.4 Cellphones ................................................................................................................................ 31 4.2.2.5 Television sets........................................................................................................................... 34 4.2.2.6 Clocks and watches.................................................................................................................... 35 4.2.2.7 Fluorescent lamps (straight and compact) .................................................................................... 42 4.2.2.8 Lawn mowers and gardening equipment ...................................................................................... 45 4.2.2.9 Video games and handheld video games...................................................................................... 48 4.2.2.10 Dispensers for hot and cold beverages......................................................................................... 50 4.2.2.11 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 53 4.3 Quantity of the hazardous substances in the selected products............................................ 53 4.3.1 Presences of RoHS substances in the selected product categories ........................................ 53 i ARCADIS ECOLAS & RPA Content 06/11925 - a study on RoHS and WEEE directives - final report 4.3.1.1 Lead ......................................................................................................................................... 53 4.3.1.2 Cadmium .................................................................................................................................. 54 4.3.1.3 Mercury .................................................................................................................................... 55 4.3.1.4 Cr(VI) ....................................................................................................................................... 55 4.3.1.5 Polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) ................................ 56 4.3.2 Estimation of quantities.................................................................................................... 56 4.3.2.1 Compare actual with past situation? ............................................................................................ 56 4.3.2.2 Absence of RoHS-directive and presence of WEEE directive?.......................................................... 57 4.3.2.3 Effectivity of RoHS Directive........................................................................................................ 57 4.3.2.4 Generalisation of the quantities of RoHS substances in the selected products .................................. 58 Methodology........................................................................................................................... 58 Results ................................................................................................................................... 60 4.4 Amounts of RoHS substances avoided in the selected products due to the implementation of the RoHS directive................................................................................................................. 64 4.4.1 Scenarios ........................................................................................................................ 64 4.4.1.1 Basic data ................................................................................................................................. 64 4.4.1.2 Average maximum benefits scenario 1......................................................................................... 65 4.4.1.3 Maximum benefits scenario 2...................................................................................................... 66 4.4.1.4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 00165 Rome, Italy Mobile: 0039 3296166838 Areas
    FABRIZIO CONTI, PHD LECTURER IN HISTORY JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND HUMANITIES VIA DELLA LUNGARA 233 00165 ROME, ITALY [email protected] MOBILE: 0039 3296166838 HTTPS://JOHNCABOT.ACADEMIA.EDU/FABRIZIOCONTI AREAS OF INTEREST AND EXPERTISE Ancient World Medieval Europe Italian Renaissance Religious Studies Magic and Witchcraft Methodology of Historical Research Humanities, Liberal Arts Education, Corporate Culture and Humanistic Capitalism EDUCATION 2011 PhD, History and Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest Thesis: Preachers and Confessors against "Superstitions". The Rosarium Sermonum by Bernardino Busti and its Milanese Context (Late Fifteenth Century), magna cum laude Supervisor: Prof. Gábor Klaniczay 2009 Certificate, Corso di iniziazione alle antichità Cristiane (Early Christian Iconography and Archaeology), Pontificio Istituto di Archeologia Cristiana, Rome 2005 Certificate, Archivistica (Archival Studies), Scuola di Paleografia, Diplomatica e Archivistica, Archivio Segreto Vaticano 2003 Master’s in Marketing Management, GEMA Business School, Rome 2001 Laurea in Lettere (MA, Humanities), University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, 110/110 e lode Thesis: The Christianization of the Anglo-Saxons through the Letters of Pope Gregory the Great (596 CE) (in Italian) Supervisors: Prof. Ludovico Gatto and Prof. Carla Delzotto 1996 Maturità Classica, Liceo Classico Statale “Ugo Foscolo”, Albano, Rome 1 TEACHING 2021 John Cabot University Fall Term HS 120 Introduction to Western Civilization I RL 225 Mystics,
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Perspectives on Higher Education in Europe: (ACE) and the Center for International Higher Diversity and Cooperation Education (CIHE) at Boston College
    Nº 6 The Boston College Center for International Higher Education 2016 igher education leaders today recognize ENGAGING WITH EUROPE: the urgency of developing an international Enduring ties, new opportunities strategy for their institutions but often H 2. Introduction lack the knowledge and perspective needed to Patti McGill Peterson inform good decisions. Students are graduating into an increasingly integrated international environment 3. 21st Century European Higher Education: Responding to that, while offering exciting opportunities, also Dynamic Change Fiona Hunter and Hans de Wit presents many challenges. Institutions must create educational environments where students 4. Bologna and the EHEA: A Primer will begin to appreciate the complexity of global Lucia Brajkovic and Robin Matross Helms integration but also develop skills to navigate it 8. Erasmus+ ... “Plus” what? successfully. Faculty are seeking opportunities to Leasa Weimer collaborate with colleagues in other countries, to 11. Horizon 2020: The EU research agenda develop globally-attuned academic programs, and Ellen Hazelkorn to expand research networks and collaborative 13. Europe’s national and regional higher education associations projects. International outreach and initiatives Irina Ferencz and Laura E. Rumbley enrich institutional culture but must be based on 18. Shifting Paradigms? Reflections on Student Mobility good information and analysis. Between Europe and the United States This series reflects a strategic collabora- Simon Morris-Lange tion between the American Council on Education 20. Regional perspectives on Higher Education in Europe: (ACE) and the Center for International Higher Diversity and Cooperation Education (CIHE) at Boston College. Each Brief is Manja Klemenčič designed to provide a succinct overview of cur- 22. European Higher Education and Research: A Global rent issues in international higher education Perspective and features articles written by leading schol- Lesley Wilson, Thomas Ekman Jørgensen, and Tia Loukkola ars, policymakers, and practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Support for the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive
    Support for the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive Project Duration Feb 2006 - Feb 2007 The implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) poses enormous challenges to the Member States as well as to the European Commission. As part of a pan-European consortium, Ecologic supports the European Commission in the implementation of the Directive. The main objective is to provide independent, impartial and punctual advice on scientific, socio-economic and technical issues related to the WFD. The WFD entered into force in December 2002. For the implementation of the Directive to be successful and effective, a common understanding and approach across political borders are crucial. In order to address the challenges in a co-operative and co-ordinated way, a Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) was put into place in 2001. Under the CIS, an institutional set-up was established, including a co-ordination group, various working groups, strategic steering groups etc. This requires a continuous support by the CIS members (European Commission, EU Member States, Norway). The WFD sets strict deadlines for implementation. As of April 2006, Member States (MS) should have legally transposed the Directive into their national legislation (Art. 24), identified the river basin districts (RBD) and competent authorities (Art. 3), and carried out a characterisation of the river basin districts (Art 5) including an analysis of pressures and impacts and an economic analysis. Within the next years, MS will have to set up monitoring programmes (by 2006) and develop river basin management plans, including programmes of measures (draft by 2009). Against this background, the European Commission, DG Environment asks for support in various tasks aimed at developing a common approach across the EU to the various challenges for implementing the WFD within the framework of the CIS.
    [Show full text]
  • A Financial Impossibility? the Case of Liberal Arts Education in Germany
    (E)quality in Education - a Financial Impossibility? The Case of Liberal Arts Education in Germany Daniel Kontowski Department of Education Studies and Liberal Arts, University of Winchester, UK & University of Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] David Kretz Bard College Berlin, Germany; [email protected] Abstract Liberal arts colleges could embody a broad and robust social justice agenda in higher education in at least four senses. On a curricular level, we can note the egalitarian nature of learning, weakening the teacher-student dichotomy as well as disciplinary boundaries, by offering small-scale, discussion-based seminars within interdisciplinary integrated curricula. On an institutional level, the social integration of academic learning with campus-based communities promotes the self-organization of students and the democratizations of university bureaucracies. Their general non-vocational mission shows a healthy distance towards the neo-liberal marketization of higher learning, and an alternative to a structured higher education system that tend to reproduce social injustices. Finally, the size and flexibility of liberal arts colleges often make them the ideal incubators for radical, even utopian, educational experimentation. (see McArthur “think piece” as well as: Nussbaum 2010, Roth 2014) Though traditionally associated with the U.S., both Western and Eastern Europe have seen a surge in liberal education institutions since the 1990s (van der Wende 2011; Godwin 2013; Godwin 2015), half of them private. Yet unlike some of their US counterparts, they face a financial trilemma: without a supportive culture of private philanthropy, and lacking public support, they increasingly rely on tuition and slash financial support for students. This way they put their social justice potential at stake, and risk becoming elitist and exclusionary.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Arts to the Rescue of the Bachelor's Degree in Europe
    Chapter 4 Liberal Arts to the Rescue of the Bachelor’s Degree in Europe Samuel Abrahám Abstract The purpose of this chapter is to demonstrate the importance of the liberal arts model as the most suitable to fulfil the potential of Bachelor studies, as well as argue that the moral element as part of any quality education will be crucial for the future challenges that Europe faces. One of the aims of the European Union educational policy has been coordination and synchronisation of its diverse systems, in order to promote student and academic exchanges and diploma recognition. This became particularly poignant after the fall of communist regimes in 1989 when a great diversity of university sys- tems existed across the continent. The Bologna Declaration signed in 1998 introduced a ‘credit system’ where each course taught at any university would be easily transfer- able to another university in another country. This has been hailed as great success, but it has not materialised in its envisioned potential. The reformed undergraduate education, refurbished through the liberal arts model, would assure not only educa- tion with depth and breadth but also the moral aptitude and the cognitive capacity of students, enabling them to confront an uncertain future. The Bologna Declaration of 1999 allowed the Bachelor’s-Master’s division; it is time, this paper argues, to allow the Bachelor’s stage to fulfil its full potential. Keywords liberal arts – future – Europe – morality – education 1 Introduction Educational institutions have globally become immensely important and seem to be always in some kind of crisis. And even during a temporary calm, academia seems to be either recovering from or heading toward a crisis – financial, structural, or existential.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning and Teaching in the Liberal Arts
    LEARNING AND TEACHING IN THE LIBERAL ARTS A Teacher Training Kit By Gabriela Pleschová, Nicholas Monk, Rebecca Fisher, Philip Gaydon, Sofie Loyens and Remy Rikkers Prepared as part of the collaborative project The Best Liberal Arts and Sciences Teaching Expanded and Reinforced(BLASTER), ERASMUS+ KA2 (2015-1-NL01-KA203-008993) Output: O2 Co-funded by Erasmus+ program of the European Union This publication only expresses authors’ opinion. The European Commission is not liable for any use of information included in their content. © 2017 European Union. All rights reserved. Licensed under conditions to the EU. Logos of project partners: ISBN: 978-80-971827-1-7 teacher trainer kit final.indd 1 19.05.17 19:20 teacher trainer kit final.indd 2 19.05.17 19:20 CONTENTS List of contributors ................................................................................................5 About ECOLAS .........................................................................................................8 Introduction ...........................................................................................................10 Pivotal issues for enhancing liberal arts and sciences education Gabriela Pleschová 1. Encouraging critical thinking...................................................................12 Gabriela Pleschová 2. Transdisciplinarity .......................................................................................23 Nicholas Monk and Rebecca Fisher (with Philip Gaydon for the video component) 3. Problem-Based Learning: An example
    [Show full text]
  • ENGAGING with EUROPE: the Urgency of Developing an International Enduring Ties, New Opportunities Strategy for Their Institutions but Often H 2
    Nº 6 The Boston College Center for International Higher Education 2016 igher education leaders today recognize ENGAGING WITH EUROPE: the urgency of developing an international Enduring ties, new opportunities strategy for their institutions but often H 2. Introduction lack the knowledge and perspective needed to Patti McGill Peterson inform good decisions. Students are graduating into an increasingly integrated international environment 3. 21st Century European Higher Education: Responding to that, while offering exciting opportunities, also Dynamic Change Fiona Hunter and Hans de Wit presents many challenges. Institutions must create educational environments where students 4. Bologna and the EHEA: A Primer will begin to appreciate the complexity of global Lucia Brajkovic and Robin Matross Helms integration but also develop skills to navigate it 8. Erasmus+ ... “Plus” what? successfully. Faculty are seeking opportunities to Leasa Weimer collaborate with colleagues in other countries, to 11. Horizon 2020: The EU research agenda develop globally-attuned academic programs, and Ellen Hazelkorn to expand research networks and collaborative 13. Europe’s national and regional higher education associations projects. International outreach and initiatives Irina Ferencz and Laura E. Rumbley enrich institutional culture but must be based on 18. Shifting Paradigms? Reflections on Student Mobility good information and analysis. Between Europe and the United States This series reflects a strategic collabora- Simon Morris-Lange tion between the American Council on Education 20. Regional perspectives on Higher Education in Europe: (ACE) and the Center for International Higher Diversity and Cooperation Education (CIHE) at Boston College. Each Brief is Manja Klemenčič designed to provide a succinct overview of cur- 22. European Higher Education and Research: A Global rent issues in international higher education Perspective and features articles written by leading schol- Lesley Wilson, Thomas Ekman Jørgensen, and Tia Loukkola ars, policymakers, and practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Slovak Republic 2019
    IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC 2019 ISBN 978-80-970860-7-7 IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC 2019 Bratislava 2019 This publication is based on information from each member institution of higher edu- cation or from the SCSTI‘s Statistical Yearbook 2018/2019. The publisher has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However, no responsibility can be taken for any errors or omissions. The information listed is subject to change. The term ‚university‘ used in this publication can refer to any school of higher education. Edited by Mária Čikešová English corrections by Danica Fetyko – Grusová Design by ZION, s. r. o. Photos provided by featured institutions Published by the Institute of the Slovak Rectors‘ Conference in 2019 with the finan- cial support of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic. Slovak Rectors´ Conference SRC Institute Panenská 29 SK - 811 03 Bratislava E-mail: [email protected] https://www.srk.sk/ A free electronic version of this publication is available through https://www.srk.sk/. Published with Creative Commons 4.0 Licence ISBN 978-80-970860-7-7 Index Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................5 About the Slovak Rectors‘ Conference .......................................................................................................6 Higher education system in the Slovak Republic.................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Slovak Republic
    Strategic Evaluation of Environment and Risk Prevention – Country Report – Slovak Republic STRATEGIC EVALUATION ON ENVIRONMENT AND RISK PREVENTION UNDER STRUCTURAL AND COHESION FUNDS FOR THE PERIOD 2007-2013 Contract No. 2005.CE.16.0.AT.016. National Evaluation Report for Slovakia Main Report Directorate General Regional Policy A report submitted by in association with Mr. Dušek Ondrej Mr. Stijn Vermoote DUIS ECOLAS nv Srbska 21 Lange Nieuwstraat 43, 612 00, Brno 2000 Antwerp Czech Republic Belgium Tel: +420 541.244.197-8 TEL +32/3/233.07.03 [email protected] [email protected] Date: November 10th, 2006 GHK Brussels Rue de la Sablonnière, 25 B-1000 Brussels Tel: +32 (0)2 275 0100; Fax : +32 (2) 2750109 GHK London 526 Fulham Road London, United Kingdom SW6 5NR Tel: +44 20 7471 8000; Fax: +44 20 7736 0784 www.ghkint.com TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................1 1 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY................................................................................................2 2 OVERVIEW AND HORIZONTAL ISSUES...............................................................................................4 2.1 General facts of the Country .................................................................................................................4 2.2 State of the environment.......................................................................................................................4 2.3 State
    [Show full text]
  • Learning and Teaching in the Liberal Arts
    LEARNING AND TEACHING IN THE LIBERAL ARTS A Teacher Training Kit By Gabriela Pleschová, Nicholas Monk, Rebecca Fisher, Philip Gaydon, Sofie Loyens and Remy Rikkers 9 788097 182717 ISBN: 978-80-971827-1-7 LEARNING AND TEACHING IN THE LIBERAL ARTS A Teacher Training Kit By Gabriela Pleschová, Nicholas Monk, Rebecca Fisher, Philip Gaydon, Sofie Loyens and Remy Rikkers Prepared as part of the collaborative project The Best Liberal Arts and Sciences Teaching Expanded and Reinforced(BLASTER), ERASMUS+ KA2 (2015-1-NL01-KA203-008993) Output: O2 Co-funded by Erasmus+ program of the European Union This publication only expresses authors’ opinion. The European Commission is not liable for any use of information included in their content. © 2017 European Union. All rights reserved. Licensed under conditions to the EU. Logos of project partners: ISBN: 978-80-971827-1-7 CONTENTS List of contributors ................................................................................................5 About ECOLAS .........................................................................................................8 Introduction ...........................................................................................................10 Pivotal issues for enhancing liberal arts and sciences education Gabriela Pleschová 1. Encouraging critical thinking...................................................................12 Gabriela Pleschová 2. Transdisciplinarity .......................................................................................23 Nicholas
    [Show full text]
  • MIMAC) Research in the Framework of the BELSPO Supporting Actions SPSD II
    Marine Incidents Management Cluster (MIMAC) Research in the framework of the BELSPO Supporting Actions SPSD II Annemie Volckaert, Dirk Le Roy, Marnix Vangheluwe, Bram Versonnen, Katrien Arijs, Frank Maes, Jan-Bart Calewaert, Jan Mees, Nancy Fockedey, Simon Claus and Colin Janssen (Eds) VLIZ SPECIAL PUBLICATION 34 Research in the framework of the BELSPO Supporting Actions – SPSD II Marine Incidents Management Cluster (MIMAC) Research in the framework of the BELSPO Supporting Actions SPSD II Edited by Annemie Volckaert1, Dirk Le Roy1, Marnix Vangheluwe2, Bram Versonnen2, Katrien Arijs2, Frank Maes3, Jan-Bart Calewaert3, Jan Mees4, Nancy Fockedey4, Simon Claus4 and Colin Janssen5 1ECOLAS, Environmental Consultancy & Assistance Rijvisschestraat 118 Bus 3, 9000 Gent, Belgium 2EURAS, European Centre for Risk Assessment Rijvisschestraat 118, Box 3, 9052 Gent, Belgium 3Maritime Institute, Department of Public International Law, Ghent University Universiteitstraat 6, 9000 Gent, Belgium 4Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), Wandelaarkaai 7, 8400 Oostende, Belgium 5Research Group Environmental Toxicology, Department of Applied Ecology and Environmental Biology Ghent University, Jozef Plateaustraat 22, 9000 Gent, Belgium VLIZ SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 34 This publication should be cited as follows: Volckaert A., D. Le Roy, M. Vangheluwe, B. Versonnen, K. Arijs, F. Maes, J.-B. Calewaert, J. Mees, N. Fockedey, S. Claus & C. Janssen (Eds). 2006. Marine Incidents Management Cluster (MIMAC). Research in the framework of the BELSPO Supporting Actions – SPSDII.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Program Lectures and Keynotes
    Conference Program Lectures and Keynotes 2nd-5th May 2019 Bard College Berlin Liberal Education as a Cultural Practice from J.W. Goethe and F. Nietzsche to E. Said Ulrike Wagner 2nd May 2019 This lecture addresses the conference topic by bringing the history of a liberal ideal of Bildung into conversation with current debates. Taking Nietzsche’s On the Advantage and Disadvantage of History for Life (1874) as a point of departure, we will go back to the turn of the eighteenth-century ​ and examine how key figures of the period grappled with what Nietzsche takes to be crucial ingredients of a productive relationship between history, educational concerns of his own age and questions of cultural value on a broader scale. Taking into view writings on art, architecture, literature and religion by J.W. Goethe, J.G. Herder, and F. Schleiermacher, I suggest that it is a set of techniques of viewing, reading, writing, collecting, commenting, and translating that is foundational to a liberal model of education as it has developed since the eighteenth-century. We will also discuss these past approaches to liberal learning and Nietzsche’s treatment thereof in the late nineteenth-century together with current theories and methodological considerations by Edward Said, Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht and Sheldon Pollock. This transhistorical and cross-disciplinary vantage point on the career of liberal education broadens and deepens our understanding of our learning and teaching today; the historical perspective also helps to better assess its present use and value and ideally inspire future visions. Ulrike Wagner is a wissenschaftliche Mitarbeiterin at Bard College Berlin and director of the German Studies Program.
    [Show full text]