DOCSLIB.ORG

Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hazard Mitigation Plan EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 85B To: All Agencies and Departments Under the Mayor From: Michael B. Hancock, Mayor Date: December 7, 2018 Subject: Adoption and Promulgation of the City and County of Denver Hazard Mitigation Plan This memorandum shall be attached to and become a part of Executive Order No. 85, dated June 17, 2011, subject "City and County of Denver's Emergency Management Program and Mission and Organization of the Mayor's Office of Emergency Management and Homeland Security." The City and County of Denver's Hazard Mitigation Plan, approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency on May 3, 2017, is attached and incorporated as a procedural memorandum and contains implementing instructions for this Executive Order. City and County of Denver Hazard Mitigation Plan May 2017 City and County of Denver Hazard Mitigation Plan May 2017 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY WARNING: This plan version, due to the inclusion of Annex B, Human Causes Hazards Risk Assessment, is FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO). It contains information that is sensitive, but unclassified, and may be exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). It is to be controlled, stored, handled, transmitted, distributed, and disposed of in accordance with local government policies relating to For Official Use Only information and is not to be released to the public or other personnel who do not have a valid "need-to-know" without prior approval of an authorized government official. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. iii 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................. iii 1.2 Background and Scope ......................................................................................................... iii 1.3 Plan Organization ................................................................................................................. iv 2.0 COMMUNITY PROFILE .................................................................................................................. 2.1 2.1 Geography and Climate ..................................................................................................... 2.2 2.2 Property ............................................................................................................................. 2.4 2.3 Infrastructure .................................................................................................................... 2.5 2.4 Demographics .................................................................................................................... 2.6 2.5 Economy ............................................................................................................................ 2.8 3.0 PLANNING PROCESS .................................................................................................................... 3.1 3.1 Background on Mitigation Planning in Denver ................................................................. 3.1 3.2 What’s New in the Plan Update ........................................................................................ 3.2 3.3 Local Government Participation ........................................................................................ 3.4 3.4 The 10‐Step Planning Process ........................................................................................... 3.4 4.0 RISK ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................................... 4.1 4.1 Hazard Identification ......................................................................................................... 4.2 4.2 Asset Summary ................................................................................................................ 4.19 4.3 Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment ............................................................................. 4.31 4.4 Capability Assessment ................................................................................................... 4.139 5.0 MITIGATION STRATEGY ................................................................................................................ 5.1 5.1 Mitigation Strategy Overview ........................................................................................... 5.1 5.2 Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions ............................................................. 5.2 5.3 Mitigation Action Plan ....................................................................................................... 5.5 6.0 PLAN ADOPTION ........................................................................................................................ 6.1 7.0 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND MAINTENANCE .................................................................................. 7.1 7.1 Implementation ................................................................................................................. 7.1 7.2 Maintenance/Monitoring .................................................................................................. 7.2 CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN – TABLE OF CONTENTS Page i ANNEXES ANNEX A: DENVER WATER ANNEX B: HUMAN‐CAUSED HAZARDS RISK ASSESSMENT (FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY) APPENDICES APPENDIX A: HAZARD‐SPECIFIC CAPABILITIES APPENDIX B: COMPLETED MITIGATION ACTIONS APPENDIX C: HAZARD MITIGATION STEERING COMMITTEE AND STAKEHOLDER WORK GROUP APPENDIX D: PLANNING PROCESS DOCUMENTATION APPENDIX E: ADOPTION DOCUMENTATION APPENDIX F: HISTORIC LANDMARKS APPENDIX G: REFERENCES CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN – TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ii 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose The City and County of Denver prepared this Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) to better protect the people and property of the City from the effects of a multitude of natural and human caused hazards. This plan demonstrates Denver’s commitment to reducing risks from these hazards and serves as a tool to help decision makers direct mitigation activities and resources. This plan was also developed, among other things, to ensure Denver’s eligibility for certain federal disaster assistance: specifically, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Assistance grant programs. Mitigation planning can also earn credits for the National Flood Insurance Program’s Community Rating System (CRS) which provides for lower flood insurance premiums for residents in CRS communities such as Denver. 1.2 Background and Scope Each year in the United States, natural disasters take the lives of hundreds of people and injure thousands more. Nationwide, taxpayers pay billions of dollars annually to help communities, organizations, businesses, and individuals recover from disasters. These monies only partially reflect the true cost of disasters as additional expenses incurred by insurance companies and nongovernmental organizations are not reimbursed by tax dollars. Many of the effects of natural disasters are predictable, and much of the damage caused by these events can be reduced or even eliminated if appropriate actions are taken. Hazard mitigation is defined by FEMA as “any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long‐term risk to human life and property from a hazard event.” The results of a three‐year, congressionally mandated independent study to assess future savings from mitigation activities provides evidence that mitigation activities are highly cost‐effective. On average, each dollar spent on mitigation saves society an average of $4 in avoided future losses in addition to saving lives and preventing injuries (National Institute of Building Science Multi‐Hazard Mitigation Council 2005). Hazard mitigation planning is the process through which hazards are identified, likely impacts are determined, mitigation goals are set, and appropriate mitigation strategies are developed, prioritized, and implemented. This plan documents Denver’s hazard mitigation planning process and the strategies the City will use to decrease vulnerability and increase resiliency and sustainability throughout the community. This plan was prepared pursuant to the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Public Law 106‐390) and the implementing regulations set forth by the Interim Final Rule published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2002, (44 CFR §201.6) and finalized on October 31, 2007. (Hereafter, these requirements and regulations will be referred to collectively as the Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) or DMA 2000.) While the act emphasized the need for mitigation plans and more coordinated mitigation planning and implementation efforts, the regulations established requirements that local hazard mitigation plans must meet in order for the City to remain eligible for certain federal disaster assistance and hazard mitigation funding under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistant Act (Public Law 93‐288). This planning effort also followed FEMA’s Local Mitigation Planning Handbook (March 2013). Information in this plan will be used to help guide and coordinate mitigation activities and decisions for local land use policy in the future. Proactive mitigation planning will help reduce the cost of future CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN – TABLE OF CONTENTS Page iii disasters in the City by protecting critical community facilities,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Railway Employee Records for Colorado Volume Iii
    RAILWAY EMPLOYEE RECORDS FOR COLORADO VOLUME III By Gerald E. Sherard (2005) When Denver’s Union Station opened in 1881, it saw 88 trains a day during its gold-rush peak. When passenger trains were a popular way to travel, Union Station regularly saw sixty to eighty daily arrivals and departures and as many as a million passengers a year. Many freight trains also passed through the area. In the early 1900s, there were 2.25 million railroad workers in America. After World War II the popularity and frequency of train travel began to wane. The first railroad line to be completed in Colorado was in 1871 and was the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad line between Denver and Colorado Springs. A question we often hear is: “My father used to work for the railroad. How can I get information on Him?” Most railroad historical societies have no records on employees. Most employment records are owned today by the surviving railroad companies and the Railroad Retirement Board. For example, most such records for the Union Pacific Railroad are in storage in Hutchinson, Kansas salt mines, off limits to all but the lawyers. The Union Pacific currently declines to help with former employee genealogy requests. However, if you are looking for railroad employee records for early Colorado railroads, you may have some success. The Colorado Railroad Museum Library currently has 11,368 employee personnel records. These Colorado employee records are primarily for the following railroads which are not longer operating. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad (AT&SF) Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad employee records of employment are recorded in a bound ledger book (record number 736) and box numbers 766 and 1287 for the years 1883 through 1939 for the joint line from Denver to Pueblo.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver Union Station Awarded LEED Certification Transit Hub Awarded Green Honor for Major 2014 Renovation
    Denver Union Station awarded LEED certification Transit hub awarded green honor for major 2014 renovation DENVER - (July 25, 2016) – Denver Union Station is pleased to announce that it has been awarded LEED Certification from the U.S. Green Building Council. Denver Union Station has become downtown Denver’s hottest gathering place since it reopened in July 2014 after a $54 million renovation, with a major goal of making the multi-use transportation hub as environmentally friendly as possible. Several local Colorado companies were involved in the historic building’s rejuvenation, including Larimer Associates, McWhinney, REGen, LLC, Sage Hospitality and Urban Neighborhoods. Originally opened in 1891, Denver Union Station is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Denver Union Station was awarded LEED points for implementing a variety of green initiatives, including: • Development density & community connectivity • Building reuse - more than 90% of the historic building’s existing structural elements were reused, including the original floors, walls & roof • Providing easy access to public transportation, including RTD’s new University of Colorado A Line to Denver International Airport and B Line to Westminster • Diverting more than 50% of construction waste from landfills. • Using low-emitting paints and flooring materials in the renovation • Regionally manufactured materials were used whenever possible • Asbestos contamination in the building was remediated Denver Union Station is home the 112-room luxury independent Crawford Hotel and 12 Colorado restaurants and retailers. A sampling of their green initiatives: • Stoic & Genuine uses the Environmental Defense Fund Seafood Charts as a guideline when ordering sustainable fish and more than 90% of its oysters are ocean–farmed • Next Door Union Station sources local produce from Colorado farmers, ranchers and other purveyors and is Zero Waste, composting all food scraps from tables and excess food from its kitchen • PigTrain Coffee Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity and Lightning-Cloudburst (Grofe)
    Electricity and lightning-Cloudburst (Grofe) Summary Students will connect the concept of positive and negative ions making lightning to the concept of lightning occurring in nature. The will use the music of Grofe' "Cloudburst" to aide the learning. Additional Core Ties Science - 5th Grade Standard 4 Objective 1 Time Frame 1 class periods of 45 minutes each Group Size Large Groups Life Skills Aesthetics, Thinking & Reasoning, Employability Materials A recording of "Cloudburst" from Grand Canyon Suite by Grofe'. Pictures of Grand Canyon Pictures of rainstorms and lightning Listening map http://www.minnesotaorchestra.org/education/curricula/musicnoisesilence/musicnoisesilence_part5.p df Background for Teachers The teacher should know the basic concepts of how lightning is formed.To put it simply, lightning is electricity. It forms in the strong up-and-down air currents inside tall dark cumulonimbus clouds as water droplets, hail, and ice crystals collide with one another. Scientists believe that these collisions build up charges of electricity in a cloud. The positive and negative electrical charges in the cloud separate from one another, the negative charges dropping to the lower part of the cloud and the positive charges staying ins the middle and upper parts. Positive electrical charges also build upon the ground below. When the difference in the charges becomes large enough, a flow of electricity moves from the cloud down to the ground or from one part of the cloud to another, or from one cloud to another cloud. In typical lightning these are down-flowing negative charges, and when the positive charges on the ground leap upward to meet them, the jagged downward path of the negative charges suddenly lights up with a brilliant flash of light.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Denver's Communities Ready for Kids?
    ARE DENVER’S COMMUNITIES READY FOR KIDS? A Brief for Individuals and Organizations Working to Improve Child Outcomes in Denver, Colorado A Collaboration between The Piton Foundation and the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership, through support from the Annie E. Casey Foundation Matthew Barry Lisa Montagu Pam Buckley, Ph.D. The Piton Foundation September 2008 Acknowledgements The Piton Foundation would like to thank the following individuals and organizations for their contribution to this brief: JENNIFER ATLER, JD PAMELA HARRIS, PH.D. STEVEN POOLE, MD Executive Director Chief Operating Officer Pediatrician Invest in Kids Denver Preschool Program The Children’s Hospital Invest in Kids is a statewide nonprofit organization The Denver Preschool Program (DPP) is the Director that partners with communities to improve the health result of a voter approved initiative to provide tuition Colorado Children’s Healthcare Access Program and well-being of Colorado’s children (prenatal to credits for parents, and quality improvement grants age eight), particularly those from low-income families, to preschools. DPP is open and voluntary for all Colorado Children’s Healthcare Access Program is a through advancing programs that work. Denver children the year before they are eligible for nonprofit organization devoted to ensuring that every kindergarten. A Denver family may use the tuition child enrolled in Medicaid and the Child Health Plan SUSAN GALLO, PH.D. credit with any preschool provider who is licensed Plus (CHP+) receives comprehensive healthcare Deputy Director by the state and enrolled with the Denver Preschool from a primary care provider. Mayor’s Office for Education and Children, Program, regardless of where that preschool is located.
    [Show full text]
  • City and County of Denver Carol Boigon
    CITY COUNCIL City and County of Denver Carol Boigon....................... At Large Chris Nevitt.........................District 7 Doug Linkhart..................... At Large Carla Madison..................... District 8 Paula E. Sandoval................ District 1 Judy H. Montero.................. District 9 Jeanne Faatz....................... District 2 Jeanne Robb....................... District 10 Paul López.......................... District 3 Michael B. Hancock.............. District 11 Peggy Lehmann................... District 4 Lauri Dannemiller................ Director Marcia Johnson.................... District 5 Kelly Velez............... Council Secretary Charlie Brown..................... District 6 ROOM 451 CITY & COUNTY BUILDING DENVER COLORADO 80202 720-865-9534 FAX: 720-865-9540 EMAIL: [email protected] **WEB ACCESS** **REMINDER** Live broadcast and audio and video As a courtesy to those in attendance, archives can be accessed at please http://www.denvergov.org/citycouncil turn off your cell phones and pagers. MEETING ASSISTANCE NOTICE - AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The Council Chambers has listening devices for the hearing impaired; request a device from the Council Secretary. The City can provide sign language interpretation for persons attending City Council meetings. If you need sign language interpretation, please contact Lorrie Kosinski at TTY 720-913-8484 at least 72 hours in advance. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA The City Council agenda and meeting schedule are made available for public review during normal business hours at Denver City Council, 1437 Bannock St., Rm. 451, on Thursday afternoons prior to the regularly scheduled meeting on Monday. The agenda packet is also posted on the City Council website. Questions on agenda items may be directed to the Denver City Council at 720-865-9534. AUDIO/VIDEO ACCESS TO CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS City Council meetings are televised live on cable TV Channel 8, and can be viewed via live or archived web cast at http://www.denvergov.org/citycouncil.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Denver Survey Report: Capitol Hill-West Cheesman Survey
    Discover Denver Know It. Love It. One Building at a Time. Survey Report: Capitol Hill-West Cheesman Survey Area Prepared by: Kathleen Corbett, Ph.D. Architectural Historian Corbett AHS, Inc. and Beth Glandon Director, Discover Denver Historic Denver, Inc. State Historical Fund Grant #16-01-021 December 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Discover Denver Overview.................................................................................................................... 1 Project Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Project History ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction: Capitol Hill-West Cheesman Survey ............................................................................... 3 2. Project Area .......................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Research Design and Methods ............................................................................................................. 6 Survey Objectives and Scope of Work .................................................................................................. 6 Survey Exclusions .................................................................................................................................. 7 Project Participants ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, United States East of the 105Th Meridian
    HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL REPORT 'N0.53 L D ..... 'C..,p "\ ..u o tM/ 'A1 ws/t.d/M 'b !>"'"'"' , , 1 1 ~, 5 E.~..~t:-west J/.,e; h~ s,J~ ..s, .... ~ ,41'b ~·qto Seasonal Variation of 10-Square-Mile Probable Maximum Precipitation Estimates, United States East of the 105th Meridian ,_ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, , -- NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOS~HERIC ADMINISI'RATION U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION - , - Silver Spnng, Md , , Apn11980 U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Nuclear Regulatory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Commission Administration NUREG/CR-1486 Hydrometeorological Report No. 53 SEASONAL VARIATION OF 10-SQUARE-MILE PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION ESTIMATES) UNITED STATES EAST OF THE 105TH MERIDIAN Prepared by Francis P. Ho and John T. Riedel Hydrometeorological Branch Office of Hydrology National Weather Service Washington, D.C. April 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract. 1 1. Introduction . 1 1.1 Authorization. 1 1.2 Purpose. 1 1.3 Scope ••... 1 1.4 Definitions .. 2 1.5 Previous study 2 2. Basic data . 2 2.1 Background • • • • • . 2 2.2 Available station rainfall data •• 3 2.2.1 Storm rainfall • • • • • 3 2.2.2 Maximum 1-day or 24-hour values, each month ••••••• 3 2.2.3 Maximum 6-, 12- and 24-hr values, each month . 3 2.2.4 11aximum recorded rainfall at first-order stations. 3 2.2.5 Data tapes, selected stations. 3 2.2.6 Data tapes, 1948-73 •. 5 2.2.7 Canadian data. 5 3. Approach to PMP. • ••. 5 3.1 Summary. 5 3.2 Selected major storm values •. 5 3.3 Moisture maximization.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Fire in the Pliocene Arctic in Response to Elevated CO2 and Temperature
    1 Evidence of fire in the Pliocene Arctic in response to elevated CO2 and temperature 2 Tamara Fletcher1*, Lisa Warden2*, Jaap S. Sinninghe Damsté2,3, Kendrick J. Brown4,5, Natalia 3 Rybczynski6,7, John Gosse8, and Ashley P Ballantyne1 4 1 College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, 59812, USA 5 2 Department of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Den 6 Berg, 1790, Netherlands 7 3 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, 3508, Netherlands 8 4 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria, V8Z 1M, Canada 9 5 Department of Earth, Environmental and Geographic Science, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, 10 V1V 1V7, Canada 11 6 Department of Palaeobiology, Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, K1P 6P4, Canada 12 7 Department of Biology & Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, K1S 5B6, Canada 13 8 Department of Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, B3H 4R2, Canada 14 *Authors contributed equally to this work 15 Correspondence to: Tamara Fletcher ([email protected]) 16 Abstract. The mid-Pliocene is a valuable time interval for understanding the mechanisms that determine equilibrium 17 climate at current atmospheric CO2 concentrations. One intriguing, but not fully understood, feature of the early to 18 mid-Pliocene climate is the amplified arctic temperature response. Current models underestimate the degree of 19 warming in the Pliocene Arctic and validation of proposed feedbacks is limited by scarce terrestrial records of climate 20 and environment, as well as discrepancies in current CO2 proxy reconstructions. Here we reconstruct the CO2, summer 21 temperature and fire regime from a sub-fossil fen-peat deposit on west-central Ellesmere Island, Canada, that has been 22 chronologically constrained using radionuclide dating to 3.9 +1.5/-0.5 Ma.
    [Show full text]
  • Depart Denver Zoo
    World-Class Care • Leading Conservation • Engaging Education 2018 ANNUAL REPORT CONNECTING AWESOME HUMANS TO THE AWE OF WILD ANIMALS INTRODUCING OUR NEW 06 PRESIDENT/CEO, BERT VESCOLANI RIO MORA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 10 AND CONSERVATION AREA JAKE AND CHUCK JOIN THE HERD AND CONNECT WITH THE HEARTS OF 12 OUR GUESTS CONTENTS DENVER ZOO EDUCATORS DEVELOP PROGRAMS THAT ENGAGE AUDIENCES 14 WITH DIVERSE ABILITIES UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD’S GENEROSITY 16 ZIPS ALONG WITH DENVER ZOO TRAIN TABLE OF TABLE CRANBEARY AND LEE MOVE TO SUPPORT SPECIES THROUGH BREEDING PROGRAM 32 AND MAKE WAY FOR EXHIBIT UPDATES FINDING NEW WAYS TO CONNECT 34 DENVER ZOO WITH OUR COMMUNITY DENVER ZOO SENDS STAFF TO HELP 36 WITH TORTOISE CRISIS IN MADAGASCAR IN THE NEWS: DENVER ZOO STORIES THAT 38 CAPTURED THE WORLD’S ATTENTION 2018 ANNUAL REPORT 3 OUR MISSION Secure a better world for animals through human understanding PROTECT We passionately commit our expertise and resources to saving animals. HONOR We treat people, animals and nature with respect. INNOVATE We strive to discover creative solutions. ENGAGE We connect people with animals by creating life-changing memories. EMPOWER We provide people the knowledge and tools to take positive action for all species. SERVE We deliver exceptional service to our guests, animals and one another. DENVER ZOO AT A GLANCE Home to more than 3,500 animals representing 550 species Denver Zoo is a critical player in the fight to save wildlife. We help our guests as well as communities around the globe connect to wild animals and wild places. Denver Zoo is the most visited cultural destination in Colorado, committed to helping animals by bringing science education to life and providing extraordinary experiences that foster human and animal connections.
    [Show full text]
  • ESSENTIALS of METEOROLOGY (7Th Ed.) GLOSSARY
    ESSENTIALS OF METEOROLOGY (7th ed.) GLOSSARY Chapter 1 Aerosols Tiny suspended solid particles (dust, smoke, etc.) or liquid droplets that enter the atmosphere from either natural or human (anthropogenic) sources, such as the burning of fossil fuels. Sulfur-containing fossil fuels, such as coal, produce sulfate aerosols. Air density The ratio of the mass of a substance to the volume occupied by it. Air density is usually expressed as g/cm3 or kg/m3. Also See Density. Air pressure The pressure exerted by the mass of air above a given point, usually expressed in millibars (mb), inches of (atmospheric mercury (Hg) or in hectopascals (hPa). pressure) Atmosphere The envelope of gases that surround a planet and are held to it by the planet's gravitational attraction. The earth's atmosphere is mainly nitrogen and oxygen. Carbon dioxide (CO2) A colorless, odorless gas whose concentration is about 0.039 percent (390 ppm) in a volume of air near sea level. It is a selective absorber of infrared radiation and, consequently, it is important in the earth's atmospheric greenhouse effect. Solid CO2 is called dry ice. Climate The accumulation of daily and seasonal weather events over a long period of time. Front The transition zone between two distinct air masses. Hurricane A tropical cyclone having winds in excess of 64 knots (74 mi/hr). Ionosphere An electrified region of the upper atmosphere where fairly large concentrations of ions and free electrons exist. Lapse rate The rate at which an atmospheric variable (usually temperature) decreases with height. (See Environmental lapse rate.) Mesosphere The atmospheric layer between the stratosphere and the thermosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure a Better World for Animals Through Human Understanding
    01 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ANNUAL 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ANNUAL Secure a betterBetter worldWorld for animals through human understanding WHAT WE DO ANIMAL CARE FIELD CONSERVATION WE PROVIDE THE HIGHEST STANDARD WE COMMIT TO SAVING WILD ANIMALS AND OF PROGRESSIVE ANIMAL CARE AND WILD PLACES THROUGH CONSERVATION CONTINUOUSLY SEEK TO INNOVATE ACTION BASED ON ENGAGEMENT WITH LOCAL AND IMPROVE. COMMUNITIES, SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES AND RESEARCH. EDUCATION PEOPLE WE BRING SCIENCE LEARNING WE VALUE OUR STAFF, VOLUNTEERS AND TO LIFE; SPARKING CURIOSITY IN, DONORS WHO ARE ESSENTIAL TO OUR SUCCESS 02 AND CREATING CONNECTIONS WITH, AND WE EMPOWER THEM TO PROVIDE LASTING ANIMALS AND NATURE. MEMORIES FOR OUR GUESTS. HOW WE DO IT 2017 ANNUAL REPORT 2017 ANNUAL PROTECT HONOR INNOVATE WE PASSIONATELY WE TREAT PEOPLE, ANIMALS WE STRIVE TO DISCOVER COMMIT OUR EXPERTISE AND NATURE WITH RESPECT. CREATIVE SOLUTIONS. AND RESOURCES TO SAVING ANIMALS. ENGAGE EMPOWER SERVE WE CONNECT PEOPLE WITH WE PROVIDE PEOPLE THE WE DELIVER EXCEPTIONAL ANIMALS BY CREATING KNOWLEDGE AND TOOLS TO SERVICE TO OUR LIFE-CHANGING MEMORIES. TAKE POSITIVE ACTION GUESTS, ANIMALS AND FOR ALL SPECIES. ONE ANOTHER. Dear Denver Zoo Supporters The role of zoos in the global conservation effort intensifies with each passing year as animals face growing pressure in their natural habitats, and experience an alarming increase in those classified as vulnerable, threatened and endangered. Zoos, particularly those accredited by the Association of Zoos & Aquariums (AZA), are called upon to help save and protect species, both within their gates and beyond. Denver Zoo has answered that call. Since 1896, we have established ourselves as a leader in the protection of wildlife, dedicating staff and funding to more than 600 conservation projects in 62 countries on six continents.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Highlander Vol 87 Election Special March 15, 2005
    Regis University ePublications at Regis University Highlander - Regis University's Student-Written Archives and Special Collections Newspaper 3-15-2005 2005 Highlander Vol 87 Election Special March 15, 2005 Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.regis.edu/highlander Part of the Catholic Studies Commons, and the Education Commons Recommended Citation "2005 Highlander Vol 87 Election Special March 15, 2005" (2005). Highlander - Regis University's Student-Written Newspaper. 186. https://epublications.regis.edu/highlander/186 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Archives and Special Collections at ePublications at Regis University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Highlander - Regis University's Student-Written Newspaper by an authorized administrator of ePublications at Regis University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. oJume 8J E.l.ectiQ.ll. Special htt ;Jiacade=w=·c=.,r_::;;:e~w~·s~e::.::d:..::ul~~L~aru~d~e~:r===~~e.ny:~~ CQJ,~oii!::!:aJ~d~o===~~ch~--1~5 2005 'R~ Unlver~y The Jesuit University of the Rocky Mountains A \\'eekly Student Publication Women's ELECTION 2005 season ends in of president and vice president, respectively. The results of the elec­ North Dakota tion determining positions for the 2005-2006 academic year were tallied on Thursday, March 3. Haug and Gallagher received a total of 384 votes while opposing candidates Alex Glueckler and Byron Schwab came out with a total of 136. Jesse Stephens. the lone candidate for chief justice received 442 votes. Of the record breaking 523 ballots received, there were 23 write-ins and 3 disputed ballots.
    [Show full text]