DOCSLIB.ORG

Flea Beetle: Organic Control Options

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flea Beetle: Organic Control Options Sustainable Agriculture A program of the National Center for Appropriate Technology • 1-800-346-9140 • www.attra.ncat.org Flea Beetle: Organic Control Options By George Kuepper, This publication focuses on organic control of fl ea beetles, one of the more serious vegetable crop pests. NCAT Agriculture Cultural and biological options are discussed along with alternative pesticidal materials. Specialist Published March 2003 Updated by Rex Dufour, NCAT Agriculture Specialist April 2015 ©NCAT IP389 Contents Introduction ............................1 Cultural/Physical Controls ....................................2 Biological Control .................2 Alternative Pesticides ..........3 References ...............................4 Further Resources .................4 Typical damage of fl ea beetle on brassicas—likely the Crucifer Flea Beetle . Photo: Rex Dufour, NCAT Introduction lea beetles are one of the most diffi cult-to- considered general feeders, though many species manage pests of eggplant and cole crops. attack only one plant or closely related kinds of FTh ey are also a problem on seedlings of plants (Metcalf and Metcalf, 1993). tomatoes, potatoes, peppers, turnips, radishes, Life history varies somewhat with species, but and corn. Th ere are various genera and species most appear to pass the winter in the adult stage, of fl ea beetles, all members of the Chrysomeli- ATTRA (www.attra.ncat.org) sheltering under plant debris in the fi eld, fi eld is a program of the National dae family. Th e adults are active leaf-feeders that margins, and adjacent areas. Th e adults emerge in Center for Appropriate Technology can, in large numbers, rapidly defoliate and kill (NCAT). The program is funded spring and may feed on weeds and less-desirable through a cooperative agreement plants. Symptoms of fl ea beetle feeding are small, vegetation until crop plants become available. As with the United States Department rounded, irregular holes; heavy feeding makes a result, they are frequent pests in seedbeds and of Agriculture’s Rural Business- leaves look as if they had been peppered with Cooperative Service. Visit the on new transplants (Metcalf and Metcalf, 1993). NCAT website (www.ncat.org) fi ne shot. Some species also vector serious dis- Th ey may become especially troublesome when for more information on eases such as potato blight and bacterial wilt of weedy areas begin to "dry up." Flea beetles cause our other sustainable agriculture and corn. Further damage may be done by the larvae, the greatest damage by feeding on cotyledons, energy projects. which feed on plant roots. Some fl ea beetles are stems, and foliage (Hines and Hutchinson, 1997). www.attra.ncat.org Page 1 In organic systems, the preferred approaches to preferred by the pest—at 6- or 12-inch intervals pest management are those that enhance the among cole crops. In one trial, this measurably diversity of the farm system, such as cover crop- reduced damage to broccoli (Byczynski, 1999). ping, rotation, and interplanting; those that use special knowledge of pest biology, such as delayed Row-cover materials such as Reema™ can be used planting; and those that take advantage of exist- to cover seedlings and provide a barrier to adult ing on-farm resources. Th ese approaches are typi- beetles. It is advisable to get the row cover in place fi ed by cultural and biological controls, which will at or before emergence for maximum protection. be discussed fi rst. Alternative pesticides, while Th e covers can be removed once the pest popu- frequently necessary for some crop pests and con- lation subsides (Ellis and Bradley, 1992). To be ditions, can be treated as "rescue chemistry" to most eff ective, row covers should be used in con- be used when and if other strategies fall short. junction with a planned crop rotation in which the crop to be protected follows a non-suscepti- ble crop. Th is reduces the chance that pests will Cultural/Physical Controls emerge under the row cover (Caldwell, 1998). Flea beetles are favored by stable, warm spring ATTRA has additional information on row cov- weather and hampered by alternating periods ers, including manufacturers and distributors, in of hot and cold temperatures with intermittent the publication Season Extension Techniques for rains. Seedlings of crops are most vulnerable to Market Gardeners. Related ATTRA fl ea-beetle feeding when stressed, particularly by Growers report some level of fl ea-beetle control Publications inadequate moisture. Providing good nutrition using white and yellow sticky traps (Byczynski, www.attra.ncat.org and favorable growing conditions aids in shorten- 1999; Anon., 1996). Reference is made to indi- ing the vulnerable early-growth stages and helps vidual traps placed every 15 to 30 feet of row. Bug Vacuums for plants survive fl ea-beetle attack. Th e literature Encircling the fi eld with continuous sticky tape Organic Crop suggests that organic fertilization may make crops Protection less attractive to fl ea beetles (McKinlay, 1992). is also mentioned. Sources of sticky traps include ARBICO and Golden Harvest Organics (see Cole Crops and Other Brassicas: Organic Because the pest is so mobile, and because so many Further Resources). Production genera and species are involved, crop rotation, by itself, has little eff ect as a control strategy. How- Since the adults overwinter in plant debris, there Organic Cotton ever, living mulches or polycultures are known to is value in sanitation procedures that destroy ref- Production reduce fl ea-beetle damage (McKinlay, 1992; Anon., uge sites. Plowing or rototilling weeds and crop residues in the fall is often recommended, as is Organic IPM Field 2000). One reason for this is that the individual crop Guide plants are not silhouetted against a bare-soil back- destruction of grassy and solanaceous (tomato ground and are less obvious to the pest (McKin- family) weeds adjacent to the fi eld (Flint, 1990). Specialty Lettuce Unfortunately, these procedures are often in con- and Greens: Organic lay, 1992). Th e ATTRA publication Companion Planting elaborates further on this subject. fl ict with good sustainable practices that strive to Production maintain soil cover and fi eld buff ers. When such Season Extension Trap cropping, in which attractive plant spe- confl icts occur, growers can view sanitation pro- Techniques for Market cies are planted near the main crop to draw the cedures as transitional strategies only and look for Gardeners pest away, off ers some possibilities for fl ea-bee- more sustainable practices to use in the future. tle management. Apparently the most practical trap crop is Chinese Southern Giant Mustard Anecdotal reports have suggested that catnip (Brassica juncea var. crispifolia), seed of which is might repel fl ea beetles. Research by organic gar- widely available. Research has shown that plant- deners in 1997 failed to confi rm this information, ing this trap crop about every 55 yards between however. Th e gardeners reported that catnip used rows of cabbage, broccoli, or caulifl ower (or as a as a mulch or sprayed as an extract tea did a gen- border around the fi eld) can do an exceptional erally poor job of repelling the pest (Long, 1998). job of protecting them. To retain eff ectiveness, reseeding of the trap crop may be necessary, Biological Control especially if the pest destroys the fi rst planting. In healthy agroecosystems, there are populations Th e trap is less eff ective in protecting crops that of benefi cial predators and parasites that work to are almost as attractive to fl ea beetles as Giant control the number of fl ea beetles and other pests. Mustard is, such as Nappa cabbage, gai choy, One example is Microcotonus vittage Muesebeck, and choy sum (Chaput, 1999). a native braconid wasp that kills the adult fl ea Another approach to trap cropping is to interplant beetle and sterilizes the female fl ea beetle (Hines radishes—Chinese Daikon and Snow Belle are and Hutchinson, 1997). Growers can manage the Page 2 Flea Beetle: Organic Control Options diversity of their farms and gardens to support Not a botanical and not often populations of benefi cials. Specifi c information mentioned in this regard, dia- on such strategies is provided in the ATTR A pub- tomaceous earth has been lication Farmscaping for Biological Control. observed to reduce fl ea-beetle populations and is sometimes Commercial formulations of entomopathogenic recommended (Anon., 1999; nematodes are eff ective agents for controlling fl ea Spring and Day, no date). beetles (Ellis and Bradley, 1992). Applied to the soil, the nematodes attack the beetle's larval stage, Th e kaolin-clay-based product reducing root feeding and helping to prevent the Surround™ has undergone some next cycle of adults from emerging. ATTRA’s preliminary evaluation for fl ea- Ecological Pest Management Database (https:// beetle control on eggplant. While attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/biorationals/index.php) eff ective in reducing fl ea-beetle has information about formulations of benefi cial damage, Surround™ degraded nematodes. Search in “Active Ingredients” under fruit yield and quality; there also Steinernema or Heterorhabditis. were problems removing the clay- An assassin bug preying on a fl ea beetle, residue coating from the fruit. with typical fl ea beetle damage on Alternative Pesticides Th e use of this product will likely eggplant leaf. Likely Western Potato Flea be limited to the early part of the Beetle. Photo: Chris Hay Botanical pesticides recommended for control- season, before fruit set (Maletta et ling fl ea beetles include neem, rotenone, pyre- al., 2002). thrin, sabadilla, and formulations of these in some combination (Ellis and Bradley, 1992). Th e Uni- Fields should be regularly monitored to deter- versity of California mentions insecticidal soap mine if and when any pesticidal agents should be as an organic option for fl ea beetles, but indi- applied. Th is is especially critical with fl ea beetles, cates that it "may provide partial control" only since a small population can do signifi cant dam- (Anon., 1997; Nielsen, 1997).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Two Additional Invasive Scarabaeoid Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) in Hawaii
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Entomology Museum, University of Nebraska State 12-2009 Two Additional Invasive Scarabaeoid Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) in Hawaii Mary Liz Jameson Wichita State University, [email protected] Darcy E. Oishi 2Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Plant Pest Control Branch, Honolulu, [email protected] Brett C. Ratcliffe University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Grant T. McQuate USDA-ARS-PBARC, U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Hilo, HI, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers Part of the Entomology Commons Jameson, Mary Liz; Oishi, Darcy E.; Ratcliffe, Brett C.; and McQuate, Grant T., "Two Additional Invasive Scarabaeoid Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) in Hawaii" (2009). Papers in Entomology. 147. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/147 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. AProcddition. HawaiianAl inv AEsiventomol scA.r SAocbs. in(2009) HAwA 41:25–30ii 25 Two Additional Invasive Scarabaeoid Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) in Hawaii Mary Liz Jameson1, Darcy E. Oishi2, Brett C. Ratcliffe3, and Grant T. McQuate4 1Wichita State University, Department of Biological Sciences, 537 Hubbard Hall, Wichita, Kansas 67260 [email protected]; 2Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Plant Pest Control Branch, 1428 South King St., Honolulu, HI 96814 [email protected]; 3University of Nebraska State Museum, Systematics Research Collections, W436 Nebraska Hall, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 [email protected]; 4USDA-ARS-PBARC, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Pine Beetle Voltinism and Life History Characteristics Across Latitudinal and Elevational Gradients in the Western United States
    For. Sci. 60(3):434–449 FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH http://dx.doi.org/10.5849/forsci.13-056 entomology & pathology Mountain Pine Beetle Voltinism and Life History Characteristics across Latitudinal and Elevational Gradients in the Western United States Barbara Bentz, James Vandygriff, Camille Jensen, Tom Coleman, Patricia Maloney, Sheri Smith, Amanda Grady, and Greta Schen-Langenheim Substantial genetic variation in development time is known to exist among mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) populations across the western United States. The effect of this variation on geographic patterns in voltinism (generation time) and thermal requirements to produce specific voltinism pathways have not been investigated. The influence of voltinism on fitness traits, body size, and sex ratio is also unclear. We monitored mountain pine beetle voltinism, adult body size, sex ratio, and air temperatures at sites across latitudinal and elevational gradients in the western United States. With the exception of two sites at the coolest and warmest locations, the number of days required to complete a generation was similar. Thermal units required to achieve a generation, however, were significantly less for individuals at the coolest sites. Evolved adaptations explain this pattern, including developmental rates and thresholds that serve to synchronize cohorts and minimize cold-sensitive life stages in winter. These same adaptations reduce the capacity of mountain pine beetle at the warmest sites to take full advantage of increased thermal units, limiting the capacity for bivoltinism within the current realized distribution. Temperature was not correlated with adult size and sex ratio, and size was greatest in host trees other than lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.).
    [Show full text]
  • Darkling Beetles and Mealworms Theresa A
    Darkling Beetles and Mealworms Theresa A. Dellinger and Eric R. Day, Department of Entomology, Virginia Tech Description Darkling beetles belong in the beetle family Tenebrionidae, which consists of more than 20,000 species of beetles. Adult darkling beetles widely range in shape and size, with most measuring from 2 – 19 mm (0.13” – 0.75”). Adults are usually a reddish-brown to brownish-black in color and can be shiny or dull. The elytra (the wing covers) can be smooth, grooved, or otherwise sculptured. Most do not have colorful patterns on their wing covers. Adults are most active at night and tend to avoid bright lights. Darkling beetle larvae are often referred to as mealworms or false wireworms. They are long, hard-bodied grubs with a cylindrical shape and are shiny yellow-brown to darKer brown in color. They are active crawlers. Yellow mealworm larva, top. Dark mealworm larva, bottom. Clemson University-USDA Cooperative Adult yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor. Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org. Clemson University-USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org. Life Cycle Darkling beetles have a complete life cycle with egg, larval, pupal, and adult stages. Most species of darkling beetles have a slow rate of development and may live for a year as an adult. Species living on grains or other stored products may develop faster. Habitat/Distribution Darkling beetles are found throughout the world except for places with very cold climates. They are scavengers and omnivores, feeding on decomposing plant material, dead insects, fungi, and stored products. Only a handful of darkling beetles are considered pests; the vast majority of them live in the wild and pose no harm.
    [Show full text]
  • Altica Tombacina</Em>
    Linfield University DigitalCommons@Linfield Jane Claire Dirks-Edmunds Documents Jane Claire Dirks-Edmunds Collection 1965 Habits and Life History of the Bronze Flea Beetle, Altica tombacina (Mannerheim) (Coleoptera-Chrysomelidae) Jane C. Dirks-Edmunds Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/jcde_docs Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Dirks-Edmunds, Jane C., "Habits and Life History of the Bronze Flea Beetle, Altica tombacina (Mannerheim) (Coleoptera-Chrysomelidae)" (1965). Jane Claire Dirks-Edmunds Documents. Published Version. Submission 24. https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/jcde_docs/24 This Published Version is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It is brought to you for free via open access, courtesy of DigitalCommons@Linfield, with permission from the rights-holder(s). Your use of this Published Version must comply with the Terms of Use for material posted in DigitalCommons@Linfield, or with other stated terms (such as a Creative Commons license) indicated in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, or if you have questions about permitted uses, please contact [email protected]. Habits and Life History of the Bronze Flea Beetle, Attica tombacina (Mannerheim) ( Coleoptera -Chrysomelidae) JANE C. DIRKS-EDMUNDS Department of Biology, Linfield College McMinnville, Oregon N THE summer of 1959 during an ecological study on Saddleback Moun­ I tain in the Oregon Coast Range in Northwestern Oregon, a bronze flea beetle, which proved to be Altica tombacina (Mannerheim), was found feed­ ing extensively on the fireweed plant, Epilobium angustifolium L. Corres­ pondence with Dr. Louis G. Gentner, a recognized authority on the genus Altica, concerning identification of the beetle disclosed that very little was known about the life history or habits of this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Paterson's Curse with the Tap-Root Flea Beetle (DSE Vic)
    January 1999 Biological control of Paterson's curse LC0155 with the taproot flea beetle ISSN 1329-833X Keith Turnbull Research Institute, Frankston Common and scientific names laying within a few weeks. Some adults may survive until late in spring. Paterson’s curse taproot flea beetle Eggs are laid on and around the crown of the plant. Larvae Longitarsus echii Koch (grubs) hatch after about three weeks, depending on the Family Chrysomelidae, leaf beetles environmental temperature. Background The larvae initially feed on the plant crown and leaf stalks, and then descend into the taproot where they feed Paterson’s curse (Salvation Jane), Echium plantagineum, is internally. After three months the larvae leave the root and a noxious weed of European origin found through much of pupate in the soil. Around one month later, they transform Victoria. It is a Regionally Controlled Weed in all into adults, which remain inactive in earthen cells in the Victorian Catchment and Land Protection Regions except soil until winter. Mallee. Landholders in these areas must take all reasonable steps to control and prevent the spread of this weed on their land and the roadsides which adjoin their land. A national program for biological control of Paterson’s curse involves the establishment of populations of the weed’s natural enemies and the redistribution of them to other sites as populations increase. A cooperative project between CSIRO and DNRE has led to the release of the Paterson’s curse taproot feeding flea beetle, Longitarsus echii, in Victoria. The flea beetle has been tested to ensure it is specific to Paterson’s curse and presents no danger to native plants or plants of economic importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Corn Flea Beetle
    Pest Profile Photo credit: North Central Branch-Entomological Society of America, UNL-Entomology Extension Common Name: Corn flea beetle Scientific Name: Chaetocnema pulicaria Order and Family: Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae Size and Appearance: Length (mm) Appearance white have a pointy end Egg ~0.35 darken slightly in color before hatching white slimly shaped Larva/Nymph < 9 cylindrical prothorax and last abdominal segment are slightly darkened small shiny black Adult < 2 enlarged hind legs white Pupa (if soft in texture applicable) gets dark before development is complete Type of feeder (Chewing, sucking, etc.): Chewing mouthparts Host plant/s: Corn is the preferred host plant, but they are also found on a number of different grass types, oats, Timothy, barley and wheat. Description of Damage (larvae and adults): The adult corn flea beetle injures corn plants by removing leaf tissue and by transmitting pathogenic bacteria. Injury by the adults appears as scratches in the upper and lower surfaces of the leaf, usually parallel to the veins. They feed on both the upper and the lower epidermis of corn leaves, but they do not chew completely through the leaves. The scratches rarely result in economy injury. The leaves of severely injured plants appear whitish or silvery. More importantly, the beetles transmit the bacterium Erwinia stewartia, the casual organism of Stewart’s wilt, to susceptible varieties of corn. Field corn infested with Stewart’s disease will show little sign of disease until late in the summer when numerous leaf lesions will appear on the leaves. The result is often small ears or no ears at all.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • CDA Leafy Spurge Brochure
    Frequently Asked Questions About the Palisade Insectary Mission Statement How do I get Aphthona beetles? You can call the Colorado Department of We are striving to develop new, effective Agriculture Insectary in Palisade at (970) ways to control non-native species of plants 464-7916 or toll free at (866) 324-2963 and and insects that have invaded Colorado. get on the request list. We are doing this through the use of biological controls which are natural, non- When are the insects available? toxic, and environmentally friendly. We collect and distribute adult beetles in June and July. The Leafy Spurge Program In Palisade How long will it take for them to control my leafy spurge? The Insectary has been working on leafy Biological Control You can usually see some damage at the spurge bio-control since 1988. Root feeding point of release the following year, but it flea beetles are readily available for release of typically takes three to ten years to get in early summer. Three other insect species widespread control. have been released and populations are growing with the potential for future Leafy Spurge What else do the beetles feed on? distribution. All of the leafy spurge feeding The beetles will feed on leafy spurge and insects are maintained in field colonies. cypress spurge. They were held in Additional research is underway to explore quarantine and tested to ensure they would the potential use of soilborne plant not feed on other plants before they were pathogens as biocontrol agents. imported and released in North America What makes the best release site? A warm dry location with moderate leafy spurge growth is best.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life History and Management of Phyllotreta Cruciferae and Phyllotreta Striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Pests of Brassicas in the Northeastern United States
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2004 The life history and management of Phyllotreta cruciferae and Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), pests of brassicas in the northeastern United States. Caryn L. Andersen University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Andersen, Caryn L., "The life history and management of Phyllotreta cruciferae and Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), pests of brassicas in the northeastern United States." (2004). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 3091. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/3091 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE LIFE HISTORY AND MANAGEMENT OF PHYLLOTRETA CRUCIFERAE AND PHYLLOTRETA STRIOLATA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE), PESTS OF BRASSICAS IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES A Thesis Presented by CARYN L. ANDERSEN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE September 2004 Entomology © Copyright by Caryn L. Andersen 2004 All Rights Reserved THE LIFE HISTORY AND MANAGEMENT OF PHYLLOTRETA CRUCIFERAE AND PHYLLOTRETA STRIOLATA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE), PESTS OF BRASSICAS IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES A Thesis Presented by CARYN L. ANDERSEN Approved as to style and content by: Tt, Francis X. Mangan, Member Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences DEDICATION To my family and friends. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisors, Roy Van Driesche and Ruth Hazzard, for their continual support, encouragement and thoughtful advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Agent: Flea Beetle Longitarsus Jacobaeae Plant Species Attacked: Tansy Ragwort Senecio Jacobaea
    Agent: Flea beetle Plant species attacked: Tansy ragwort Longitarsus jacobaeae Senecio jacobaea Impact on target plant: The adults feed on the foliage and cause significant mortality of rosettes during the winter months. The larvae feed in the roots and the leaf petioles. Collection and release: Use a motorized vacuum unit to suck adults from rosettes in the fall. Releases of 100-500 are recommended. Because the beetle is so widespread, redistribution in western Oregon is unnecessary. Distribution: The beetle has been released in 24 Oregon counties and is established in 21. History: The ragwort flea beetle Longitarsus jacobaeae, introduced in 1971, the workhorse of the ragwort program, has reduced ragwort density by 95% in western Oregon. The combination of the cinnabar moth and flea beetle has nearly eliminated large outbreaks of flowering ragwort in many areas in western Oregon. Occasional flare-ups of ragwort reoccur, but the insects usually control the plants within a couple of years. Plant competition is an important factor in maintaining biocontrol of ragwort. In 2007, cooperative research project with Dr. Mark Schwarzländer and staff (U of ID), looked into the feasibility of using the Swiss biotype of the flea beetle to control infestations in Eastern Oregon, where the Italian biotype is ineffective. Releases of the Swiss biotype were made in Umatilla County in 2007 and in Umatilla and Union Counties in 2008. The insect readily established in similar habitats in Idaho and Montana. Monitoring in 2010 and 2011 for the Swiss biotype did not show that that the beetles established in eastern Oregon. Flea beetle populations can exist where host densities are low.
    [Show full text]
  • Altitudinal Variation of Dung Beetle (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae
    Global Ecology and Biogeography, (Global Ecol. Biogeogr.) (2005) 14, 327–337 Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. RESEARCH Altitudinal variation of dung beetle PAPER (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) assemblages in the Colombian Andes Federico Escobar1,2,*, Jorge M. Lobo3 and Gonzalo Halffter1 1Departamento de Biodiversidad y ABSTRACT Comportamiento Animal, Instituto de Ecología, Aim We describe the changes in species richness, rarity and composition with alti- A.C., Apartado Postal 63, 91000 Xalapa, tude, and explore whether the differences in Scarabaeinae dung beetle composition Veracruz, México; 2Programa de Inventarios de Biodiversidad, Instituto Humboldt, Apartado along five altitudinal transects of the same mountain range are related to altitude or Aéreo 8693 Santafé de Bogotá, Colombia; and if there are interregional differences in these altitudinal gradients. 3 Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Location Field work was carried out on the eastern slope of the eastern Cordillera, Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Colombian Andes, between Tamá Peak to the north, in the Tamá National Park Naturales (CSIC), c/José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2. (07°23′ N, 72°23′ W) and the San Miguel River (00°28′ N, 77°17′ W) to the south. E-28006 Madrid, Spain Methods Sampling was carried out between February 1997 and November 1999 in five regions spanning elevation gradients. In each gradient, six sites were chosen at 250 m intervals between 1000 and 2250 m a.s.l. Results We found a curvilinear relationship between altitude and mean species rich- ness, with a peak in richness at middle elevations. However, the diversity of dung beetle assemblages does not seem to be related to the interregional differences in environ- mental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Study of the Mint Flea-Beetle, Longitarus Waterhousei Kutsch
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Leung, Yuk Viaan . S. Eitomo1ogy ---------------------- for the -------- in --------------- (Naine) (Degree) (Majr) La'r 11th 1938 Date Thesis presented-- --------- Title ------ Abstract APProved:L (Major Professor) The nii.nt flea-beetle, Lonitarsuswaterhouei,is a new dilsoovery in Ore:on. It mi:ht have been brought in in the infested roots froi Michigan. As far a is iciown the beetle attacks the raint family only. The roatest damage is done by larvae which feed on the epidermis of the small rooUets and tunnel through the large roots in the spring, causing the abnornial growth of the plant or killing the plant coplete1y ir. sorne cases. The adult beetles feed on the epidermis of the fo1iace and frequently riddle the loaves vth tiny holes. There is but one generation a year. The insects overwinter in the egg stage. The adult beetles appeared in the field sometime in July. The females begin to deposit eggs a month or so after emergence. The larvae will hatch at any time after spring approaches. After the larvae are fully developed, they leave the roots to pupate in the soll. The stae thkes about 26 days. Several control methods are suyested, A GEITERíL STUDY OF TI MINT FLEA-BEETLE, LONGITRSUS VATEHHOUSEI J11TSCH by YUK iAN LEUNG A THESIS submitted to the OREGON STATE GRICULTURL COLLEGE in partial fulfillment of the reauirements for the degree of lIASTER OF SCIENCE May 1938 APPROVED: Head of Department of Entomology In Charge of i:ajor Chairman of School Graduate Coniittee Chairman of College Graduate Council TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ..........
    [Show full text]