Where Is Chichen Itza? Chichen Itza Is an Ancient Mayan City Built in Approximately 400 CE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Where is Chichen Itza? Chichen Itza is an ancient Mayan city built in approximately 400 CE. It is in the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico. In 2007, Chichen Itza was named one of the seven wonders of the modern world. Vis iting Chichen Itza When you visit Chichen Itza, the first thing you will notice is the Temple of Kukulkan. Kukulkan is a feathered snake god of the Mayans with a similar significance to a Chinese dragon. Carved serpent heads guard each set of stairs. On the spring and autumn equinox sunsets, the pyramid is designed so that Kukulkan’s shadow slithers down the steps to join the snake head at the bottom. Who were the Mayans? The Itza were the group of Mayan people who lived in the area. Chichen Itza was an extremely important pilgrimage site for 1000 years for the ancient Maya people. The Maya civilisation began before 2000 BC and lasted until 1697 when the Spanish Empire conquered their last remaining city. The Maya people lived in south-eastern Mexico. Interesting facts! What surrounds Chichen Itza? - Chichen Itza translates to ‘at the mouth of the well of the Itza’. Surrounding the main pyramids - There are also temples dedicated to different gods, are the remains of what was markets, theatres, palaces and homes. It is a place well once a bustling city. This worth visiting when you are next In Mexico! includes a ball court, which was - The ancient city of Chichen Itza was well planned in used for a highly dangerous design. The pyramids and temples were built in clusters, game that involved a five- with paved walkways in between. Archaeologists have kilogram ball being thrown high found over 80 of these walkways all over the site. into the air as well as killing the - Did you know that there are 13 ballcourts in Chichen losing team. Itza? .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Ancient Maya Afterlife Iconography: Traveling Between Worlds
University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2006 Ancient Maya Afterlife Iconography: Traveling Between Worlds Mosley Dianna Wilson University of Central Florida Part of the Anthropology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Wilson, Mosley Dianna, "Ancient Maya Afterlife Iconography: Traveling Between Worlds" (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 853. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/853 ANCIENT MAYA AFTERLIFE ICONOGRAPHY: TRAVELING BETWEEN WORLDS by DIANNA WILSON MOSLEY B.A. University of Central Florida, 2000 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Liberal Studies in the College of Graduate Studies at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2006 i ABSTRACT The ancient Maya afterlife is a rich and voluminous topic. Unfortunately, much of the material currently utilized for interpretations about the ancient Maya comes from publications written after contact by the Spanish or from artifacts with no context, likely looted items. Both sources of information can be problematic and can skew interpretations. Cosmological tales documented after the Spanish invasion show evidence of the religious conversion that was underway. Noncontextual artifacts are often altered in order to make them more marketable. An example of an iconographic theme that is incorporated into the surviving media of the ancient Maya, but that is not mentioned in ethnographically-recorded myths or represented in the iconography from most noncontextual objects, are the “travelers”: a group of gods, humans, and animals who occupy a unique niche in the ancient Maya cosmology.
[Show full text]
THE GREAT MAYAN ECLIPSE: Yucatán México October 14, 2023
Chac Mool, Chichén Itzá Edzna Pyramid, Campeche THE GREAT MAYAN ECLIPSE: Yucatán México October 14, 2023 October 6-16, 2023 Cancún • Chichén-Itzá • Mérida • Campeche On October 14, 2023, a ‘ring of fire’ Annular Solar Eclipse will rip across the western U.S. and parts of the Yucatán in México as well as Central and South America. Offer your members the opportunity to see a spectacular annular eclipse among the ruins of the mighty Maya civilization. Meet in Cancún before heading off to Chichén Itzá, Ek Balam, Uxmal, Mérida, and Campeche. On Eclipse Day transfer to our viewing site outside Campeche in the vicinity of the Maya Site of Edzná to see this spectacular annular solar eclipse. Here passengers can see a smaller-than-usual moon fit across 95% of the sun to leave a ring of fire. The ring of fire will reign for 4 minutes and 31 seconds while very high in the darkened sky. Highlights • Swim in a cenote or sinkhole formed million years ago from a colossal asteroid impact to the region. • Enjoy a stay at a luxury and historic hacienda. • Investigate the UNESCO Heritage Sites of Chichén Itzá one of the “New 7 Wonders of the World.” • Witness the ring of fire of an Annular clipseE near the Maya ruins. Itinerary 2023 Oct 06: U.S. / Cancún Oct 08: Chichén Itzá Fly to Cancún. Transfer to hotel near the airport. Meet in the Private sunrise tour of Chichén Itzá before it opens to the public. early evening at the reception area for a briefing of tomorrow’s The site contains massive structures including the immense El departure.
[Show full text]
The Rulers of Palenque a Beginner’S Guide
The Rulers of Palenque A Beginner’s Guide By Joel Skidmore With illustrations by Merle Greene Robertson Citation: 2008 The Rulers of Palenque: A Beginner’s Guide. Third edition. Mesoweb: www. mesoweb.com/palenque/resources/rulers/PalenqueRulers-03.pdf. Publication history: The first edition of this work, in html format, was published in 2000. The second was published in 2007, when the revised edition of Martin and Grube’s Chronicle of the Maya Kings and Queens was still in press, and this third conforms to the final publica- tion (Martin and Grube 2008). To check for a more recent edition, see: www.mesoweb.com/palenque/resources/rulers/rulers.html. Copyright notice: All drawings by Merle Greene Robertson unless otherwise noted. Mesoweb Publications The Rulers of Palenque INTRODUCTION The unsung pioneer in the study of Palenque’s dynastic history is Heinrich Berlin, who in three seminal studies (Berlin 1959, 1965, 1968) provided the essential outline of the dynasty and explicitly identified the name glyphs and likely accession dates of the major Early and Late Classic rulers (Stuart 2005:148-149). More prominent and well deserved credit has gone to Linda Schele and Peter Mathews (1974), who summarized the rulers of Palenque’s Late Classic and gave them working names in Ch’ol Mayan (Stuart 2005:149). The present work is partly based on the transcript by Phil Wanyerka of a hieroglyphic workshop presented by Schele and Mathews at the 1993 Maya Meet- ings at Texas (Schele and Mathews 1993). Essential recourse has also been made to the insights and decipherments of David Stuart, who made his first Palenque Round Table presentation in 1978 at the age of twelve (Stuart 1979) and has recently advanced our understanding of Palenque and its rulers immeasurably (Stuart 2005).
[Show full text]
Maya Use and Prevalence of the Atlatl: Projectile Point Classification Function Analysis from Chichen Itza, Tikal, and Caracol
University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2012 Maya Use And Prevalence Of The Atlatl: Projectile Point Classification unctionF Analysis From Chichen Itza, Tikal, And Caracol Andrew J. Ciofalo University of Central Florida Part of the Anthropology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Ciofalo, Andrew J., "Maya Use And Prevalence Of The Atlatl: Projectile Point Classification unctionF Analysis From Chichen Itza, Tikal, And Caracol" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2111. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2111 MAYA USE AND PREVALENCE OF THE ATLATL: PROJECTILE POINT CLASSIFICATION FUNCTION ANALYSIS FROM CHICHÉN ITZÁ, TIKAL, AND CARACOL by ANDREW J. CIOFALO B.A. University of Massachusetts, 2007 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2012 © 2012 Andrew Joseph Ciofalo ii ABSTRACT Multiple scholars have briefly discussed the Maya use of the atlatl. Yet, there has never been a decisive encompassing discussion of prevalence and use of the atlatl in the Maya region with multiple lines of support from iconographic and artifactual analyses. This thesis explores the atlatl at Chichén Itzá, Tikal, and Caracol Maya sites to prove that atlatl prevalence can be interpreted primarily based on projectile point “classification function” analysis with support from iconographic and artifactual remains.
[Show full text]
Maya: River Valley Civilization Without a River
4.3 River Valley Civilization without a River How can there be a river valley civilization without a river valley? In the Eastern Hemisphere, Afro-Eurasia, the “civilization package” developed in the Nile, Tigris-Euphrates, Indus, and Huang He (Yellow) river valleys. Regular water sources, temperate climate, and agricultural surpluses, made possible the emergence of states, trade, laws, skilled crafts, military, organized religion, record keeping, and literacy. In regions around the world missing one of these vital elements, that were too wet or dry, too warm or cold, the civilization package failed to emerge, except in one case. The Mayan civilization on the Yucatan peninsula of present day Mexico is the only ancient civilization that developed without a river to support agricultural, and expanding population, and civilization package. The water had to come from somewhere. Can you suggest a hypothesis to explain this phenomenon? In the central and northern ends of the Mayan world (c. This image of a deep well in a water-starved region of 400-800) there were no major rivers or lakes and the the Yucatan, was drawn in 1842 by the Englishman climate was arid. (Source: Microsoft Maps) Frederick Catherwood. Does it suggest an explanation of where the Mayans got their water and why their civilization eventually collapsed? Activity (either individual or team): You are a member of a team of archeologists visiting the Mayan ruins at Chichén Itzá. 1. Make of a list of the things you observe while looking at these pre-Columbian Mayan ruins. 2. Based on your observations, write a preliminary report describing the tentative hypotheses you have made about the culture of the pre-Columbian Mayan people living at Chichén Itzá.
[Show full text]
A Study of Two Maya Tenons from Corozal
A Study of two Maya Tenons from Corozal By Ben Ward Anthropology 281 (Seeds of Divinity), Spring 2019 This paper concerns two Maya tenons that reside in the Williams College Museum of Art (WCMA). One, with accession number 1870.1.1 shows an anthropomorphic face with a peaked headdress, while the other, 1870.1.2., sports a zoomorphic face with humanoid head emerging from its jaws. These two sculptures were collected by Williams students during a trip to Honduras and Belize in 1870-1871, sponsored by the Williams Lyceum. Beyond this, very little is known about these sculptures due to the same reason that they are in the museum’s possession. While these students were in Central America two of the students went on a short trip to the small agricultural town of Corozal where they acQuired these two stone tenons and brought them back to Williams College. The detail we are given on the acQuisition of these pieces is both frustratingly vague and very telling for the times: Among the collections from Corozal were two stone heads, or images, exhumed near that town. They exhibit great antiQuity, and are evidently of the same origin as the sculptures found amid the ruins of the ancient temples and cities scattered throughout Central America, and are viewed with such intense interest by all travelers to this seat of fallen civilization.1 The only real useful information we get from this passage is that these tenons come from a Maya site near the town of Corozal.2 There seems to have been no interest in the sculptures’ true origin point and it is not even stated whether these statues were bought in Corozal or taken by these students directly from a site.
[Show full text]
El Complejo Escenico De Chinkultic, Chiapas
Navarrete, Carlos 2007 El complejo escénico de Chinkultic, Chiapas. En XX Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala, 2006 (editado por J. P. Laporte, B. Arroyo y H. Mejía), pp. 987-1006. Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología, Guatemala. (Versión digital). 58 EL COMPLEJO ESCÉNICO DE CHINKULTIC, CHIAPAS Carlos Navarrete Palabras clave Arqueología Maya, México, Chiapas, Chinkultic, arquitectura, función, espacios útiles, plazas ceremoniales Abstract THE SCENIC COMPLEX AT CHINKULTIC, CHIAPAS The possible function of the great plazas in Maya architecture has given rise to many interpretations. They can be seen as public places where large concentrations of people can participate in religious activities, as meeting points during pilgrimages on specific dates in the ritual calendar, as well as places to celebrate commemorative politic or ideological acts and also as fields for tianguis or periodic markets. Architecturally, these are wide, open areas with room to accommodate multitudes of people. Some are open while others are enclosed by walls and flanked by long low structures, generally stepped, together with low mounds; all of these structures had a public nature: ballcourts, ceremonial water reservoirs, platforms for dance or orations, raised platforms with poles carrying symbols, and a sequential placement of commemorative monuments, stelae and altars. This paper highlights a perfectly designed square plaza, formed by stands on three sides, open on one end, with three low mounds spaced along the open end, and a small central platform. Groups with these characteristics are scarce and have been referred to as “scenic complexes” or theatrical stages. In this work, other examples of this complex from the Lowland Maya area are discussed.
[Show full text]
Mayan-Pack-For-Kids.Pdf
Mayans As the Learning Team are working from home and don’t have access to our actual handling artefacts, we have created a series of learning posts/pages based on our schools Mayan loans box replicas. We don’t have Mayan artefacts in our collection—the box was created to sup- port teachers. This pack is aimed at supporting children’s learning at home. Our information is short and easy to read - but remember this is about interesting you in the topic, it’s not the whole history of the Mayans. Mayan Calendar Mayan calendars are a set of 3 interlocking calendars; Tzolkin, Haab, Long Count calendar. When Mayans referred to a date in an inscription, they used all three calendars to write the date. Every 52 years the Tzolkin and Haab would sync together, this was called a calendar round. The Tzolkin or sacred calendar was a 260 day period divided into 20 equal peri- ods. Each day was represented by a day and a number. The numbers ran from 1 to 13 and there were 20 day names. When the cycle of 1 to 13 was complete it would start again, the 20 day names would continue. It took 260 days to re- turn back to number 1 and day 1. The Haab or Solar calendar has 365 days, so therefore can be most closely linked to the Georgian calendar we use today. However, the Mayans divided the year up into 18 months of 20 days each and then 5 isolated days that were seen to be unlucky, this time was known as the Wayeb.
[Show full text]
Programme for the Symposium
10th European Maya Conference Symposium The Maya and Their Neighbours Internal and External Contacts Through Time Universiteit Leiden en Rijksmuseum voor Volkenkunde LEIDEN, 9-10 December 2005 Friday, 9 December Registration and Welcome address 08.00 – 09.00 Registration 09.00 – 09.10 Welcome Address: Prof. dr. Breimer (Rector Magnificus Universiteit Leiden) Introduction 09.10 – 09.20 Willem Adelaar (University of Leiden) 09.20 – 09.50 Manuel de Jesus Salazar Tetzahuic (Minister of Cultural Affairs, Guatemala) Principios y valores de la Cosmovisión Maya Session 1: The Maya and their Neighbours: the Linguistics and Hieroglyphs 09.50 – 10.20 Nora England (University of Texas, Austin) Linguistic and cultural revitalization among contemporary Mayas 10.20 – 10.50 Alfonso Lacadena (Universidad Complutense) Los primeros vecinos letrados de los Mayas: implicaciones históricas de la presencia de rasgos lingüísticos no-mayas en la escritura maya -COFFEE BREAK- 11.15 – 11.45 Frauke Sachse (University of Bonn) What Language can Tell you – Reconstructing the Cultural History of Xinka and Maya Interaction 11.45 – 12.15 Lucero Meléndez Guadarrama & Carlos Pallán (UNAM) Foreign Influences on the Maya Script 12.15 – 12.45 Discussion -LUNCH BREAK- Session 2: The Maya and their Neighbours: Interaction with Teotihuacán 14.30 – 15.00 Albert Davletshin (Russian State University) Names of Strangers in the Maya Hieroglyphic Inscriptions: Patterns of Interethnic Interaction in Pre-Columbian Mesoamerica 15.00 – 15.30 Wieslaw Koszkul (Jagiellonian University of Cracow) Teotihuacán Influence in Northeastern Peten in the Early Classic Period 15.30 – 16.00 David Stuart (University of Texas, Austin) The Teotihuacán Presence in the Maya Lowlands: Reflections on the Newest Historical and Archaeological Evidence -COFFEE BREAK- Session 3: The Maya and their Neighbours: the Pipil and Costa Rica 16.30 – 17.00 Ruud van Akkeren (Museo Popol Vuh) Tzuywa, Place of the Gourd 17.00 – 17.30 M.
[Show full text]
Sacrificio Y Culto Fálico En Yucatán Claude François Baudez
Sacrificio y culto fálico en Yucatán Claude François Baudez To cite this version: Claude François Baudez. Sacrificio y culto fálico en Yucatán. Mayab, Sociedad Española de Estudios Mayas, 2007, 19, pp.71-85. hal-01876312 HAL Id: hal-01876312 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01876312 Submitted on 18 Sep 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. S.E.E.M. Presidente: Andrés Ciudad Ruiz Secretario: Pedro Pitarch Ramón Vocales: Julián López García Alfonso Lacadena García-Gallo M.a Josefa Iglesias Ponce de León Tesorero: Jesús Adánez Pavón MAYAB N.o 19: Directora: M.a Josefa Iglesias Ponce de León Subdirector: Jesús Adánez Pavón Consejo Editorial: José Miguel García Campillo (Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Andrés Ciudad Ruiz (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) Comité Científico: Marie Charlotte Arnauld (C.N.R.S. UMR ((Archéologie des Amériques}»), Stephen Houston (Brown University, Providence), Juan Pedro Laporte (Universidad de San Carlos, Guatemala) y Mario Humberto Ruz (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México) Los índices de los artículos publicados en Mayab, son recogidos en AIO, Anthropogical Literature, HAPI, HLAS, ISOC- América Latina, Catálogo Latindex y FRANCIS. La correspondencia relacionada con la S.E.E.M.
[Show full text]
Who Were the Maya? by Robert Sharer
Who Were the Maya? BY ROBERT SHARER he ancient maya created one of the Belize, Honduras, and El Salvador until the Spanish Conquest. world’s most brilliant and successful The brutal subjugation of the Maya people by the Spanish ca. 1470 CE civilizations. But 500 years ago, after the extinguished a series of independent Maya states with roots The Kaqchikel Maya establish a new Spaniards “discovered” the Maya, many as far back as 1000 BCE. Over the following 2,500 years scores highland kingdom with a capital at Iximche. could not believe that Native Americans of Maya polities rose and fell, some larger and more powerful had developed cities, writing, art, and than others. Most of these kingdoms existed for hundreds of ca. 1185–1204 CE otherT hallmarks of civilization. Consequently, 16th century years; a few endured for a thousand years or more. K’atun 8 Ajaw Europeans readily accepted the myth that the Maya and other To understand and follow this long development, Maya Founding of the city of Mayapan. indigenous civilizations were transplanted to the Americas by civilization is divided into three periods: the Preclassic, the “lost” Old World migrations before 1492. Of course archaeol- Classic, and the Postclassic. The Preclassic includes the ori- ogy has found no evidence to suggest that Old World intru- gins and apogee of the first Maya kingdoms from about 1000 sions brought civilization to the Maya or to any other Pre- BCE to 250 CE. The Early Preclassic (ca. 2000–1000 BCE) Columbian society. In fact, the evidence clearly shows that pre-dates the rise of the first kingdoms, so the span that civilization evolved in the Americas due to the efforts of the began by ca.
[Show full text]
Architectural Survey at Chichen Itza
ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY AT CHICHEN ITZA George F. Andrews University of Oregon 1 z SITE: CHICHEN ITZA NUMBER; 16Qd(9):l DATE: 1991 BACKGROUND Although Chichen Itza is assumed to have been seen by the Spanish conquistadores as early as 1528 and several of its buildings were described by Bishop Landa (1566), its history as far as architecture is concerned properly begins with Stephens' and Catherwood's visit to the site in 1842. They were followed by Charnay (1860, 1882), LePlongeon (1879, etc.), Maudslay (1889-1902, 1906, 1910), Breton (1900-1904), and E. Seler (t^iT ). Commencing in the early 19205, the Carnegie Institution of Washington initiated a series of excavation and restoration projects at the site which involved a large number of individuals, including Jean Chariot, S.G. Morley, Earl Morris, Karl Ruppert, P.S. Martin, Gustav Stromsvik, J.R. Bolles, R.T. Smith, Oliver Ricketson, H.E.D. Pollock, J.E.S. Thompson, George Vaillant, and R. Wauchop. Overlapping with the work of this group were a number of restoration projects carried out under the auspices of INAH, Mexico. More recent studies have been carried out by Thompson (1945), Ruppert (1952), Tozzer (1957), Cohodas (1978), Lincoln (1986) and others. I first visited the site in 1960 but the bulk of my architectural data was recorded in 1973, 1981, and 1983. Because the present report is concerned primarily with the architecture at Chichen Itza, the references cited above do not include the names of those who have focussed their attention on the art, ceramics, "Toltec" and/or "Itza" historical relationships, and other areas of specialization.
[Show full text]