Reviving and Restructuring the Corporate Sector Post-Covid

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reviving and Restructuring the Corporate Sector Post-Covid Reviving and Restructuring the Corporate Sector Post-Covid DESIGNING PUBLIC POLICY INTERVENTIONS DISCLAIMER This report is the product of the Group of Thirty’s Steering Committee and Working Group on Corporate Sector Revitalization and reflects broad agreement among its participants. This does not imply agreement with every specific observation or nuance. Members participated in their personal capacity, and their participation does not imply the support or agreement of their respective public or private institutions. The report does not represent the views of the membership of the Group of Thirty as a whole. ISBN 1-56708-181-9 Copies of this paper are available for US$25 from: The Group of Thirty 1701 K Street, N.W., Suite 950 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 331-2472 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.group30.org Twitter: @GroupofThirty Reviving and Restructuring the Corporate Sector Post-Covid DESIGNING PUBLIC POLICY INTERVENTIONS Published by Group of Thirty Washington, D.C. December 2020 Working Group on Corporate Sector Revitalization STEERING COMMITTEE Mario Draghi, Co-Chair Jason Furman Former President, European Central Bank Professor of the Practice of Economic Policy, Former Governor, Banca d’Italia Harvard University Former Chairman, U.S. Council of Economic Advisers Raghuram Rajan, Co-Chair Professor of Finance, Chicago Booth School of Business Tharman Shanmugaratnam Former Governor, Reserve Bank of India Senior Minister, Singapore Chairman, Monetary Authority of Singapore PROJECT DIRECTORS Douglas Elliott Victoria Ivashina Partner, Oliver Wyman Lovett-Learned Professor of Business Administration, Harvard University WORKING GROUP MEMBERS Gerd Häusler Hélène Rey Member of the Supervisory Board, Munich Reinsurance Lord Bagri Professor of Economics, Former Chairman and CEO, Bayerische Landesbank London Business School Former Professor of Economics and International John Heimann Affairs, Princeton University Senior Advisor, Financial Stability Institute Former Comptroller of the Currency, United States Masaaki Shirakawa Distinguished Guest Professor, Gail Kelly Aoyama-Gakuin University Senior Global Advisor, UBS Group AG Former Governor, Bank of Japan Former CEO and Managing Director, Westpac Banking Corporation Yi Gang Governor, People’s Bank of China GROUP OF THIRTY v EXPERTS Andrew Bailey, Oliver Wyman Stuart Mackintosh, Group of Thirty Sofia Price, Oliver Wyman vi Reviving and Restructuring the Corporate Sector Post-Covid Contents Foreword ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ix Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ x 1 Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 The situation ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 The response ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Core principles ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Making hard choices ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 Potential tools .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.6 Decision framework .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.7 Time to act .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................7 2.1 Policy objectives ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Report scope, structure, and conceptual approach ...................................................................................................................................... 8 3 The unique economic challenges presented by the Covid-19 pandemic and the initial policy response .................9 3.1 The unique economic challenges presented by Covid-19........................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 The first wave of policy responses .....................................................................................................................................................................13 3.3 Why we have not yet seen major solvency issues ...................................................................................................................................... 14 3.4 Why the existing measures are insufficient .................................................................................................................................................. 16 4 Targeting: Which companies to assist, and why? .....................................................................................................................................17 4.1 What are your priorities? .......................................................................................................................................................................................17 4.2 What resources do you have available? .......................................................................................................................................................... 18 4.3 Where are there market failures with substantial social costs? ........................................................................................................... 19 4.4 Which firms should be assisted through public policies to address these market failures? ..................................................... 20 5 Governance: Who decides which companies to assist? ....................................................................................................................25 5.1 How should the viability and needs of individual firms be determined, and by whom? ..............................................................25 6 Design and implementation: How to assist them? ...............................................................................................................................29 6.1 What public support could be provided? .......................................................................................................................................................29 6.2 How should the chosen intervention be structured? ................................................................................................................................ 30 6.3 When should the interventions be made, and for how long? ................................................................................................................47 6.4 Is additional action needed to prevent spillovers to the financial sector? ...........................................................................................47 7 Recommendations for policymakers: Putting this into practice ..................................................................................................53 7.1 Ten core principles for policymakers ................................................................................................................................................................53 7.2 Decision framework ................................................................................................................................................................................................55 7.3 Putting these recommendations into practice ..............................................................................................................................................55 8 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 APPENDIX A: Emerging pandemic business interruption insurance proposals post-Covid 19 ......................................59
Recommended publications
  • SOUHRNNÁ TERITORIÁLNÍ INFORMACE Čína
    SOUHRNNÁ TERITORIÁLNÍ INFORMACE Čína Souhrnná teritoriální informace Čína Zpracováno a aktualizováno zastupitelským úřadem ČR v Pekingu (Čína) ke dni 13. 8. 2020 3:17 Seznam kapitol souhrnné teritoriální informace: 1. Základní charakteristika teritoria, ekonomický přehled (s.2) 2. Zahraniční obchod a investice (s.15) 3. Vztahy země s EU (s.28) 4. Obchodní a ekonomická spolupráce s ČR (s.30) 5. Mapa oborových příležitostí - perspektivní položky českého exportu (s.39) 6. Základní podmínky pro uplatnění českého zboží na trhu (s.46) 7. Kontakty (s.81) 1/86 http://www.businessinfo.cz/cina © Zastupitelský úřad ČR v Pekingu (Čína) SOUHRNNÁ TERITORIÁLNÍ INFORMACE Čína 1. Základní charakteristika teritoria, ekonomický přehled Podkapitoly: 1.1. Oficiální název státu, složení vlády 1.2. Demografické tendence: Počet obyvatel, průměrný roční přírůstek, demografické složení (vč. národnosti, náboženských skupin) 1.3. Základní makroekonomické ukazatele za posledních 5 let (nominální HDP/obyv., vývoj objemu HDP, míra inflace, míra nezaměstnanosti). Očekávaný vývoj v teritoriu s akcentem na ekonomickou sféru. 1.4. Veřejné finance, státní rozpočet - příjmy, výdaje, saldo za posledních 5 let 1.5. Platební bilance (běžný, kapitálový, finanční účet), devizové rezervy (za posledních 5 let), veřejný dluh vůči HDP, zahraniční zadluženost, dluhová služba 1.6. Bankovní systém (hlavní banky a pojišťovny) 1.7. Daňový systém 1.1 Oficiální název státu, složení vlády Čínská lidová republika (Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo; zkráceně Zhongguo) Úřední jazyk čínština (Putonghua, standardní čínština založená na pekingském dialektu), dále jsou oficiálními jazyky kantonština v provincii Guangdong, mongolština v AO Vnitřní Mongolsko, ujgurština a kyrgyzština v AO Xinjiang, tibetština v AO Xizang (Tibet). Složení vlády • Prezident: Xi Jinping (v úřadu od 14.
    [Show full text]
  • The Insolvency Service Annual Plan 2019-2020
    Annual Plan 2019-2020 Contents Chief Executive’s Foreword .................................................... 5 Chair of the Board’s Foreword ................................................ 6 1. Delivery framework .............................................................. 8 1.1 Strategic delivery ..................................................................................................................8 2. Ministerial targets .............................................................. 13 3. Delivering economic confidence ...................................... 14 3.1 Objectives ...........................................................................................................................14 3.2 Targets ................................................................................................................................15 4. Supporting those in financial distress .............................. 16 4.1 Objectives ...........................................................................................................................16 4.2 Targets ................................................................................................................................17 4.3 Change portfolio milestones ..............................................................................................17 5. Tackling financial wrongdoing .......................................... 18 5.1 Objectives ...........................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • UK (England and Wales)
    Restructuring and Insolvency 2006/07 Country Q&A UK (England and Wales) UK (England and Wales) Lyndon Norley, Partha Kar and Graham Lane, Kirkland and Ellis International LLP www.practicallaw.com/2-202-0910 SECURITY AND PRIORITIES ■ Floating charge. A floating charge can be taken over a variety of assets (both existing and future), which fluctuate from 1. What are the most common forms of security taken in rela- day to day. It is usually taken over a debtor's whole business tion to immovable and movable property? Are any specific and undertaking. formalities required for the creation of security by compa- nies? Unlike a fixed charge, a floating charge does not attach to a particular asset, but rather "floats" above one or more assets. During this time, the debtor is free to sell or dispose of the Immovable property assets without the creditor's consent. However, if a default specified in the charge document occurs, the floating charge The most common types of security for immovable property are: will "crystallise" into a fixed charge, which attaches to and encumbers specific assets. ■ Mortgage. A legal mortgage is the main form of security interest over real property. It historically involved legal title If a floating charge over all or substantially all of a com- to a debtor's property being transferred to the creditor as pany's assets has been created before 15 September 2003, security for a claim. The debtor retained possession of the it can be enforced by appointing an administrative receiver. property, but only recovered legal ownership when it repaid On default, the administrative receiver takes control of the the secured debt in full.
    [Show full text]
  • China's 2017 Communist Party Leadership Structure & Transition
    China’s 2017 Communist Party Leadership Structure & Transition US-CHINA BUSINESS COUNCIL JUNE 2017 China’s 2017 Communist Party Leadership Structure & Transition June 2017 Executive Summary ● The 19th Chinese Communist Party (CCP) congress, in fall 2017, is expected to mark the beginning of President Xi Jinping’s second, five-year term as China’s top leader and fill other senior political posts. In the past, some second-term party congresses have signaled leadership succession plans for the next congress. ● The party congress not only chooses top party personnel, but also establishes policy priorities for the subsequent five years. These priorities are condensed into a political report delivered by the party’s incumbent top leader on behalf of the Central Committee. ● Leadership turnover could be significant. If previous party congress norms hold, many key national and provincial party leaders could be replaced for reaching the targeted retirement age of 68. This means five of the seven current Politburo Standing Committee members could retire, leaving only President Xi and Premier Li Keqiang to continue. Additionally, at least 11 of the 25 members of the Politburo are likely to retire, based solely on retirement age. Average turnover in the larger Central Committee has been 60 percent, based on age and other factors. ● Changes to the majority of senior positions within the party and the State Council, China’s cabinet, will be announced on an ongoing basis through the National People’s Congress in March 2018. As part of the transition, many key government officials whose work affects trade and commerce in China will retire or be promoted to new positions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Italian Candidate: the Appointment of Mario Draghi to the Presidency of the ECB
    6 The ITalIan CandIdaTe: The appoInTmenT of marIo draghI To The presIdenCy of The eCB Kenneth Dyson and Lucia Quaglia After prolonged negotiations, on 24 June 2011, the governor of the Bank of Italy, Mario Draghi, was appointed president of the European Central Bank (ECB) as successor to Jean-Claude Trichet. His mandate runs from 1 November 2011 to 31 October 2019. Draghi’s appointment was consistent with a long-standing practice of Italian politicians and officials seeking to engage with the process of European integration by ensuring that they were “sitting at the European top table.” In the context of the euro area, sitting at the top table for Italy was initially about gaining euro entry as a founding member state in 1999 and, subsequently, about having strong Italian representation in the gov- erning structures of the euro area, particularly the ECB.1 Once the sovereign debt crisis became contagious in 2010–2011, it meant ensur- ing that financial markets drew a clear distinction between Italy and periphery member states such as Greece and Portugal that suffered from sovereign debt distress. However, retaining a seat at the European high table did not prove easy. First, Italy qualified late for euro entry, with little safety margin and the help of some last-minute and somewhat controversial fiscal measures and in the face of much German skepticism. Second, the cir- cumstances surrounding the resignation in 2005 of the Bank of Italy’s governor, Antonio Fazio, damaged Italy’s reputation. Third, by the Italian Politics: From Berlusconi to Monti 27 (2012): 155–171 © Berghahn Books doi:10.3167/ip.2012.270109 156 Kenneth Dyson and Lucia Quaglia summer of 2011, Silvio Berlusconi’s government was battling against a loss of financial market credibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with Secured Lenders1
    CHAPTER TWO Dealing with Secured Lenders1 David Hillman2 Mark Shinderman3 Aaron Wernick4 With investors continuing to pursue higher yields, the market for secured debt has experienced a resurgence since the depth of the fi nancial crisis of 2008. For borrowers, the lenders’ willingness to make these loans has translated to increased liquidity and access to capital for numerous purposes, including (i) providing working capital and funding for general corporate purposes; (ii) funding an acquisition-related transaction or a recapitalization of a company’s balance sheet; or (iii) refi nancing a borrower’s existing debt. The increased debt loads may lead to fi nancial distress when a borrower’s business sags, at which point management will typically turn to its secured lenders to begin negotiations on the restructuring of the business’s debt. Consequently, the secured lenders usually take the most active role in monitoring the credit and responding to problems when they fi rst arise. Secured loans come in many different forms and are offered from a range of different investors. The common feature for secured debt is the existence of a lien on all or a portion of the borrower’s assets. Following is a brief overview of the common types of secured lending: Asset-Based Loans. The traditional loan market consisted of an asset based lender (traditionally a bank or commercial fi nancing institution) providing revolving loans, term loans, and letters of credit secured by a fi rst priority lien on accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and 1. Special thanks to Douglas R. Urquhart and Roshelle Nagar of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP for their contributions to earlier editions of this chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Mario Draghi: Welcome Remarks
    Mario Draghi: Welcome remarks - 8th ECB conference on central, eastern and south-eastern European countries Welcome remarks by Mr Mario Draghi, President of the European Central Bank, at the 8th ECB conference on central, eastern and south-eastern European countries, Frankfurt am Main, 12 June 2019. * * * Dear guests and colleagues, It is a great pleasure to welcome you to the eighth ECB conference on central, eastern and south-eastern European (CESEE) countries. There are many differences between the 18 economies in the CESEE region1, but one thing they have in common is that they have all experienced real economic convergence towards the EU average since the 1990s. Over the last two decades, in particular, real GDP per capita growth has averaged 3.8% in the region, compared with 1.4% in the European Union (EU) as a whole. But there has been a clear difference in the pace of convergence.2 Countries that have joined the EU, and which are hereafter referred to as the central and eastern European (CEE) economies,3 reached GDP per capita levels of 70% of the EU average. Within this group, the countries that have joined the euro area have grown even faster, reaching almost 80% of the EU average. In contrast, catching up has been markedly slower in the economies outside the EU, with income levels below 40%4 of the EU28 average.5 EU and euro area membership acted as a catalyst for convergence, creating the institutional and economic conditions for CEE economies to adopt highly effective growth strategies. Their faster convergence shows that, with high-quality institutions in place, the EU Single Market can be a powerful engine of growth, allowing not only the poorer countries to catch up, but also the richer countries to benefit from a larger market and opportunities to increase production efficiency.6 However, in order to maintain convergence and reap lasting benefits from the Single Market and euro area membership, efforts to ensure institutional quality and good governance have become all the more important given the headwinds facing CEE economies.
    [Show full text]
  • Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) and the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills (DIUS)
    James Davies Clerk of the Committee Business Innovation and Skills Committee House of Commons 7 Millbank London SW1P 3JA 7 July 2010 Dear James Main Estimates Memorandum 2010-11 I am enclosing the Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS’s) Memorandum for the forthcoming Main Estimate. This Memorandum has been prepared in accordance with the “Guide to Preparing Estimate Memoranda” and has been approved by the Departmental Accounting Officer. Presentation and publication of the Main Estimate was made on 21 June 2010. I recognise that, as this is a new Committee, some of this information may require fuller explanation to bring members fully up to speed with the Department’s activities and funding. I will be happy to provide any additional information which may be required. Yours sincerely Howard Orme Director General, Finance and Commercial Finance and Commercial, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET www.bis.gov.uk Direct Line +44 (0)20 7215 5936 | Fax +44 (0)20 7215 3248 | Mincom +44 (0)020 7215 6740 Enquiries +44 (0)20 7215 5000 | Email [email protected] 1 Department for Business Innovation and Skills Main Estimate 2010-11 Select Committee Memorandum 1. This is the first Main Estimate for the Department for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS). The principal activities of the Department relate to the funding, policy and support of Innovation, Business and Enterprise; Further and Higher education and Skills; and Science and Research. 2. The Main Estimate for 2010-11 seeks the necessary resources and cash to support the functions of the Department and its Non Departmental Public Bodies (NDPBs).
    [Show full text]
  • Underwriting; Development of the Restructuring Plan
    Chapter 5 Underwriting; Development of the Restructuring Plan Executive Summary Section 5-1 This chapter describes the PAEs actions for financial underwriting of the M2M transaction and the development of the Restructuring Plan. The PAE will determine the project’s rents, expenses, and deposits to the reserves under various scenarios. The PAE will then size the first and second mortgages, and third mortgage, if needed, and determine the amount of claim payable by FHA, as well as the sources and uses in the transaction, and the owner’s financial return. The results of this underwriting, the due diligence described in Chapter 4, the tenant comments, and owner negotiations are consolidated in the draft Restructuring Plan Package submitted to the OAHP Preservation Office. The PAE should work cooperatively with the owner and lender as needed throughout this process. Underwriting Model Section 5-2 A. General. OAHP has provided an Underwriting Model for use in completing the financial underwriting of M2M transactions. A copy of the Model is available on OAHP’s Web site or can be obtained through the OAHP Preservation Office. Use of the Model is required and helps meet the unique requirements of this program that will not be present in other underwriting models. However, the Model is only an aid and may not be appropriate or complete for every case; the PAE remains responsible for its own conclusions, and for appropriately addressing unusual conditions that may not be fully considered by the model or this Guide. B. Using the Model. PAEs are responsible for using the most recent, appropriate model and generally following the procedures reflected therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief 13-3: Debt Restructuring and Economic Prospects in Greece
    Policy Brief NUMBER PB13-3 FEBRUARY 2013 a significant part of even the reduction for private holdings. A Debt Restructuring and December package of official sector relief (in the form of lower interest rates and support for a buyback of about half of the Economic Prospects restructured privately held debt) set the stage for resumption of IMF and euro area program disbursements and restored the conditions for managing the remaining debt over the next few in Greece years if reasonable growth and fiscal expectations are achieved. Over the longer term, however, it is unclear that Greece William R. Cline will be able to reenter private capital markets by 2020 even if its debt level is down to the range of about 120 percent of William R. Cline, senior fellow, has been associated with the Peterson GDP. The damage to its credit reputation from restructuring Institute for International Economics since its inception in 1981. His with a large haircut seems likely to leave it in a more difficult numerous publications include Resolving the European Debt Crisis (coed- borrowing position than other euro area sovereigns even if itor, 2012), Financial Globalization, Economic Growth, and the Crisis it achieves comparable debt levels. Further relief on official of 2007–09 (2010), and The United States as a Debtor Nation (2005). sector claims thus seems likely to be needed in the future, Note: I thank Jared Nolan for research assistance. For comments on an but is not urgent at present because almost all of Greece’s earlier draft, I thank without implicating Joseph Gagnon and Edwin borrowing needs should already be covered for the next few Truman.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Framework for Sovereign Debt Restructuring That Works 1
    Creating a Framework for Sovereign Debt Restructuring that Works 1 Martin Guzman2 and Joseph E. Stiglitz3 Abstract Recent controversies surrounding sovereign debt restructurings show the weaknesses of the current market-based system in achieving efficient and fair solutions to sovereign debt crises. This article reviews the existing problems and proposes solutions. It argues that improvements in the language of contracts, although beneficial, cannot provide a comprehensive, efficient, and equitable solution to the problems faced in restructurings—but there are improvements within the contractual approach that should be implemented. Ultimately, the contractual approach must be complemented by a multinational legal framework that facilitates restructurings based on principles of efficiency and equity. Given the current geopolitical constraints, in the short-run we advocate the implementation of a “soft law” approach, built on the recognition of the limitations of the private contractual approach and on a set of principles – most importantly, the restoration of sovereign immunity – over which there may be consensus. We suggest that in a context of political economy tensions it should be impossible for a government to sign away the sovereign immunity either for itself or successor governments. The framework could be implemented through the United Nations, or it could prompt the creation of a new institution. Keywords: Sovereign Debt Crises, Sovereign Debt Restructuring, Debt Contracts, International Lending 1 We are indebted to Sebastian
    [Show full text]
  • Mario Draghi: Interview with Europe 1
    Mario Draghi: Interview with Europe 1 Interview with Mr Mario Draghi, President of the European Central Bank, with Europe 1, conducted by Mr Jean-Pierre Elkabbach on 23 September 2014, aired on 24 September 2014. * * * Europe 1: You have already acted decisively in June and September. If unemployment continues to grow, can the ECB continue to stimulate the economy? Monetary policy will stay accommodative for a long time and I can say that the Governing Council is unanimous in its commitment to use the available instruments within its mandate to bring inflation back to close but below 2%. Interest rates will stay at the present level for an extended period of time because they can’t go much lower than that. In Europe, is there a risk today of deflation or even of recession? For the euro area as a whole we don’t see risk of deflation. We see risk of too low inflation for too long a time and for the euro area as a whole, as I’ve said many times our recovery is modest, weak, uneven, and fragile, but it’s not recession. Do you have a lot of liquidity at the ECB? Yes, we’ve shown that we have a lot of liquidity in the ECB. And could you show it again? And we’re certainly, as I said before, we’re certainly ready to use all the instruments within our mandate to make sure that… To obtain more of growth by 2017, 2018: what needs to be done? One talks about developing infrastructure and about investing.
    [Show full text]