85/7/6 Columbia University Library Columbia University Library
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Adams Memorial (Rock Creek Cemetery)
Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (July 1*69) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE COUNTY: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY E-N-TRY NUMBER (Type all entries — complete applicable sections) 1 0 Adams Memorial (Rock Creek Cemetery) AND/OR HISTORIC: "Grief"; "Peace of God" STREET AND NUMBER: Webster Street and Rock Creek Church Road, N.W CITY OR TOWN: Washington COUNTY: District of Columbia 11 District of Columbia 0.01 11 CATEGORY ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC District D Building Public Public Acquisition: [~| Occupied Yes: |X] Restricted Site I | Structure Private || In Process EC] Unoccupied | | Unrestricted Object Both | | Being Considered | 1 Preservation work in progress D No PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) I I Agricultural Q Government D Park I I Transportation I | Comments Q Commercial Q Industrial I | Private Residence E&] Other (Specify) [ | Educational Q Military fcH Religious Memorial I | Entertainment [| Museum I | Scientific OWNER©S NAME: Adams Memorial Society Rock Creek Cemetery STREET AND NUMBER: Webster Street and Rock Creek Church Road. N.W Cl TY OR TOWN: STATE: Washington District of Columbia 11 COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: Recorder of Deeds STREET AND NUMBER: 6th and D Streets, N.W, Cl TY OR TOWN: Washington District of Columbia 11 TITLE OF suRVEY:proposed District of Columbia Additions to the National Regis- ter of Historic Properties recommended by the Joint Committee on Landmarks DATE OF SURVEY: March 7, 1968 Federal State -
Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 36 (2006) Repository
Pennsylvania Bulletin Volume 36 (2006) Repository 3-18-2006 March 18, 2006 (Pages 1205-1348) Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2006 Recommended Citation Pennsylvania Legislative Reference Bureau, "March 18, 2006 (Pages 1205-1348)" (2006). Volume 36 (2006). 11. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/pabulletin_2006/11 This March is brought to you for free and open access by the Pennsylvania Bulletin Repository at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 36 (2006) by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Volume 36 Number 11 Saturday, March 18, 2006 • Harrisburg, PA Pages 1205—1348 See Part II page 1347 Part I for the Pennsylvania Gaming Agencies in this issue: The Courts Control Board’s Temporary Regulations Department of Agriculture Department of Community and Economic Development Department of Environmental Protection Department of General Services Department of Health Department of Public Welfare Department of Revenue Department of Transportation Fish and Boat Commission Independent Regulatory Review Commission Insurance Department Legislative Reference Bureau Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Philadelphia Regional Port Authority State Board of Cosmetology State Board of Medicine State Board of Osteopathic Medicine State Board of Veterinary Medicine Detailed list of contents appears inside. PRINTED ON 100% RECYCLED PAPER Latest Pennsylvania Code Reporter (Master Transmittal Sheet): No. 376, March 2006 published weekly by Fry Communications, Inc. for the PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Legislative Reference Bu- reau, 647 Main Capitol Building, State & Third Streets, (ISSN 0162-2137) Harrisburg, Pa. -
Cornerstone Law Firm
Greater Reading – Northern Edition Guaranteed Delivery THE KEY TO SMART BUYING Volume XLIX – No. 15 April 8, 2020 www.TheMerchandiser.com • Landlord-Tenant Issues • Estates • Criminal Defense • Contract Disputes • Litigation • Property Law • Business Set-Up • Personal Injury Even Under Quarantine, We Still Solve Problems 1. Free Wills for COVID-19 patients (one more reason to get tested). 2. All work and meetings done remotely (because 6 feet is still too close to a lawyer). 3. Free consult for: • Business Owners (because business problems don’t “shelter-in-place”). • Landlord/Tenant (yes, we help both sides-that’s what makes us good). • Employment Issues (This one is serious). • Personal Injury (from when you were allowed to go out). • Any legal issue (if you tell us a good lawyer joke). 4. If Your loved One Dies, we review the will for free (and we’re sorry for your loss). 5. $50 Simple Will (Because we can’t do everything for free). All Jokes Aside: This is a great time to talk with your lawyer (because the alternative is quarantine with your kids). Terms and Conditions Apply David W. Crossett, Esq. David W. Crossett has piloted multi-million-dollar business disputes, briefed cases before the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and fiercely defended clients’ First Amendment rights. Mr. Crossett finished 3rd in his class at Regent University Law School and served as the editor of the Law Review. Before law school, Mr. Crossett earned a Bachelor’s of Arts in Theology from Moody Bible Institute and also studied at Word of Life Bible Institute. -
Congressional Membership and Appointment Authority to Advisory Commissions, Boards, and Groups
Congressional Membership and Appointment Authority to Advisory Commissions, Boards, and Groups Updated February 12, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33313 Congressional Membership and Appointment Authority to Advisory Bodies Summary Over the past several decades, Congress, by statute, has established a wide array of commissions, boards, and advisory bodies to provide it with assistance in meeting various legislative, investigative, and administrative responsibilities. Some of these entities are temporary and created to serve specific functions, such as studying a discrete policy area or performing one-time tasks. Others are permanent, serving an ongoing purpose, such as overseeing an institution or performing a regular administrative function. The majority of these congressional bodies provide that Members of Congress, particularly the leadership, be intimately involved in the appointment process, either through direct service on a commission, or by appointing or recommending candidates for membership. The choice of a particular mechanism for membership appointment may have implications for the ability of these entities to fulfill their congressional mandates. Examination of the statutory language creating these bodies reveals several common approaches to membership selection. Each alternative schema has its advantages. For example, a commission or board composed entirely of Members permits a high degree of congressional control over the entity’s operations. Bodies composed mainly of qualified private citizens or executive branch appointees may provide a broader expertise than Member-only bodies. Assemblages of mixed membership provide some of the advantages of both Member and citizen-only appointment schemes. This report contains a compilation of existing commissions and boards that demonstrates the range of alternative membership-appointment structures. -
City of Reading, PA, Comprehensive Plan, 2000
City of Reading, Pennsylvania Comprehensive Plan 2000 JUNE 2000 Comprehensive Plan 2000 MAYOR JOSEPH D. EPPIHIMER, L1 READING CITY COUNCIL PAUL J. HOH, PRESIDENT VINCENT GAGLIARDO, JR. CASEY GANSTER JEFF WALTMAN CHARLES KNOLL JOHN ULRICH VAUGHN SPENCER CITY OF READING PLANNING COMMISSION - ,S. HENRY LESSIG, CHAIRMAN EDMUND PALKA, VICE-CHAIRMAN ERMETE J. RAFFAELLI, SECRETARY MIKE LAUTER, ASSISTANT SECRETARY STANLEY J. PAPADEMETRIOU CHARLES E. FAIRCHILD DONNA REED DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ERIC J. GALOSI, ACTING DIRECTOR June, 2000 -A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE S. Henry Lessig, Chairman Tom Brogan, Albright College Nelson deLeon, Reading Means Business Team Vito Ellison, Reading High Student Marcia Goodman Hinnershitz, Coalition for a Healthy Community William Hall, Member at Large Ted Jamula, Southern Middle School Principal Terry Knox-Ramseur, United Way of Berks County Tom McKeon, Berks County Industrial Development Authority Stanley Papademetriou, Reading Planning Commission Yvette Santiago, Human Relations Council Joseph Templin, Downtown Improvement District Sandra Wise, Police Athletic League COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF Fritz Rothermel, Senior Planner Karl Graybill, Planner Amy Woldt, Community Development Specialist Neil Nemeth, Community Development Specialist David Johnson, Business Resource Center Coordinator The Planning Commission wishes to extend its appreciation to the many individuals who participated in the preparation of this plan., but who are no longer employed by the City or hold public office. In particular the Commission would like to acknowledge the contributions of the following individuals: Emily Richardson, City Council, District #2. Michael Fiucci, City Council, District #6. Thomas A. Cookingham, Community Development Department Director Pamela Shupp Straub, Community Development Department Director Jennifer Gober, Planner John Weller, Community Planning & Development Division Manager The Task Forces and membership lists can be found in Appendix B. -
City of Readins; Psnrisylvania
City of Readins; Psnrisylvania JUNE 2000 c Ji -e Executive Summary THE PROCESS The City of Reading faces an uncertain and challenging future. It has reached the point in its growth and evolution when it is necessary to look at and plan for the future. Significant changes continue to occur at local and regional levels. Changing economics, shifting population bases, industrial plant closings, older housing stock and aging public facilities are headlines that appear in the news media every day. On the other hand, there are prospects for regional economic growth, collaboration and other potential opportunities that can be pursued. The current Master Plan for the City of Reading was adopted in 1969. There were efforts in 1980 and 1986 to develop an updated plan, but support was limited and final drafts were never completed. In January 1997, the Reading Planning Commission suggested to the Mayor and City Council that the Commission and appropriate Planning staff develop a new Comprehensive P!an and related Strategic Action Plan. The recommendation was endorsed by the P,dministrz- tion, and the Planning Commission identified several critical objectives to be included in the creation of the new plan. These have been summarized in the following Mission Statement: 3. “The Comprehensive Plan for Reading serves as a formally adopted statement of poli- cies regarding the City’s future. It provides a framework for public and private decisions that impact the prioritization of resource allocation, increases neighborhood and busi- 2 ness stability, and improves the overall quality of life. The document can also serve as a guide to address changing human and physical environments, strengthen community confidence and involvement, provide investment security, preserve and enhance the positive qualities of Reading, and reinforce the City as a regional hub.” In June 1997, City Council directed the Planning Commission and appropriate staff of the Community Development Department to prepare a Comprehensive Plan and Strategic Action Plan for Reading. -
Dorset Humanists’ Death Café Will Be Their Engagement
August 2018 Saturday 11th August 2.00pm Moordown Wednesday 22nd August 7.30pm Community Centre, Coronation Avenue Green House Hotel, Grove Road, BH1 3AX BH9 1TW Death Café The Big Change in At a Death Café people Religion and Belief gather to eat cake, drink tea or coffee and discuss A talk by Jeremy Rodell death. The objective of a Britain is currently going Death Café is 'to increase awareness of through what’s been death with a view to helping people make called the biggest change the most of their finite lives’. It’s a group- in religion and belief directed discussion of death with no set landscape since the agenda. It’s a discussion group not a grief Reformation, 500 years support or counselling session. Death Café ago. But what's really going on? It’s a lot aims to be accessible, respectful and more complex than simply a decline in confidential with no intention of leading organised religion and an increase in those people to any particular conclusion or who have no religion. Some faith groups are course of action. themselves growing. And what do we mean Web designer Jon Underwood from by ‘non-religious’ anyway? Or ‘religious’ for Hackney, East London, founded Death Café that matter? What might humanists do to in 2011. He died in 2017 at the age of 44. play a constructive role in making this great The Death Café model was developed by social change work for everyone? Jeremy Jon Underwood and Sue Barsky Reid, Rodell is Humanists UK’s volunteer based on the ideas of Swiss sociologist Dialogue Officer and a former Trustee. -
Annual Report July 2018–June 2019 Contents
Annual Report July 2018–June 2019 Contents MHS by the Numbers ii Year in Review 1 Impact: National History Day 2 Acquisition Spotlight 4 Why the MHS? 7 New Acquisitions 8 In Memoriam: Amalie M. Kass 10 LOCATION What’s the Buzz around the MHS? 12 1154 Boylston Street Boston, MA 02215 Financials 14 CONTACT Donors 16 Tel: 617.536.1608 Fax: 617.859.0074 Trustees and Overseers 21 VISITOR INFORMATION Fellows 22 Gallery Hours: Mon., Wed., Thu., Fri., and Sat.: 10:00 am Committees 26 to 4:00 pm Tue.: 10:00 am to 7:00 pm Library Hours: The mission of the Massachusetts Historical Society is to promote Mon., Wed., Thu., and Fri.: 9:00 am understanding of the history of Massachusetts and the nation by to 4:45 pm collecting and communicating materials and resources that foster Tue.: 9:00 am to 7:45 pm Sat.: 9:00 am to 3:30 pm historical knowledge. SOCIAL AND WEB @MHS1791 @MassachusettsHistoricalSociety Cover: Ruth Loring by by Sarah Gooll Putnam, circa 1896–1897. Above: Show-and-tell with the staff of the Office of Attorney General Maura Healey, before the event Robert www.masshist.org Treat Paine’s Life and Influence on Law, December 11, 2018 i BY THE Year in Review FY2019 NUMBERS Reaching out, thinking big, and making history—what a year it has been for the MHS! RECORD-BREAKING We welcomed new staff and new Board members, connected with multiple audiences, processed 152 linear ACQUIRED LINEAR FEET OF MANUSCRIPT MATERIAL feet of material, welcomed researchers from around the world, and broke fundraising records at our new 1GALA 352 Making History Gala all while strategizing about our future. -
Libraries Eligible for Increased E-Rate Funding Per Square Foot IMLS Categories 11, 12 and 21
Libraries Eligible for Increased E-rate Funding Per Square Foot IMLS Categories 11, 12 and 21 IMLS Locale Code Definition City Large: Territory inside an urbanized area and inside a principal city with population of 250,000 or 11 more Midsize: Territory inside an urbanized area and inside a principal city with a population less than 12 250,000 and greater than or equal to 100,000 Suburb Large: Territory outside a principal city and inside an urbanized area with population of 250,000 or 21 more Based on Data from the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) FY 2012 Public Libraries Survey Libraries Eligible for Increased E-rate Funding Per Square Foot IMLS Categories 11, 12 and 21 STATE LOCALE LIBRARY NAME AK 11 ANCHORAGE PUBLIC LIBRARY AZ 11 CITY OF MESA MAIN LIBRARY AZ 11 PHOENIX PUBLIC LIBRARY AZ 11 PIMA COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 ANAHEIM PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 FRESNO COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 KERN COUNTY LIBRARY CA 11 LONG BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 LOS ANGELES PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 OAKLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 RIVERSIDE PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 SACRAMENTO PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 SAN DIEGO PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 SANTA ANA PUBLIC LIBRARY CA 11 STOCKTON-SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY CO 11 AURORA PUBLIC LIBRARY CO 11 DENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY CO 11 PIKES PEAK LIBRARY DISTRICT DC 11 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PUBLIC LIBRARY FL 11 JACKSONVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY GA 11 ATLANTA FULTON PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM IL 11 CHICAGO PUBLIC LIBRARY IN 11 ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY IN 11 INDIANAPOLIS-MARION COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY KS 11 WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY KY 11 LEXINGTON PUBLIC LIBRARY KY 11 LOUISVILLE FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY LA 11 NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC MA 11 BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY MD 11 ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY MI 11 DETROIT PUBLIC LIBRARY MN 11 SAINT PAUL PUBLIC LIBRARY MO 11 KANSAS CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY MO 11 CITY OF ST. -
Attached Is the Latest Public Document from June 2018
Application: Dorset Council 2020 Susan Ward-Rice - [email protected] Workplace Equality Index Summary ID: A-9836913279 Last submitted: 9 Sep 2019 04:11 PM (UTC) Section 1: Employee Policy Completed - 16 Mar 2020 Workplace Equality Index submission Policies and Benefits: Part 1 Section 1: Policies and Benefits This section comprises of 7 questions and examines the policies and benefits the organisation has in place to support LGBT staff. The questions scrutinise policy audit process, policy content and communication. This section is worth 7.5% of your total score. Below each question you can see guidance on content and evidence. At any point, you may save and exit the form using the buttons at the bottom of the page. 1 / 98 1.1 Does the organisation have an audit process to ensure relevant policies (for example, HR policies) are explicitly inclusive of same-sex couples and use gender neutral language? GUIDANCE: The audit process should be systematic in its implementation across all relevant policies. Relevant policies include HR policies, for example leave policies. Yes Please describe the audit process: State when the process last happened: Policy and guidance reviews take place in line with review dates and in consultation with our recognised Trade Unions, it is an ongoing process. Describe the audit process: An audit/review of human resources policies and practice (including guidance notes) takes place on a planned basis, set by the HR Senior Leadership Team who identify when policies and guidance are due for review. This process allows us to identify and refresh any outdated policies and practices. -
BACKGROUND for the PLAN Fleetwood Borough – Maidencreek Township – Richmond Township Joint Comprehensive Plan Background Report
BACKGROUND FOR THE PLAN Fleetwood Borough – Maidencreek Township – Richmond Township Joint Comprehensive Plan Background Report BACKGROUND FOR THE PLAN This part of the Plan summarizes major findings in the following subject areas: • Regional Influences • Brief History • Government Profile • Natural Features • Population, Housing and Employment • Existing Land Use • Community Facilities and Services • Transportation and Circulation • Land Use Policies and Zoning in the Region REGIONAL INFLUENCES A community’s regional setting is a prominent influence on its growth and development. Fleetwood Borough, Maidencreek and Richmond Townships are located in north-central Berks County, a suburban to rural area that has seen steady development pressures from the Lehigh Valley and Reading areas. The area still maintains a very strong agricultural community. Fleetwood Borough, Maidencreek and Richmond Townships are situated in north-central Berks County in southeastern Pennsylvania. Berks County lies along the western edge of the Delaware Valley region, which is part of the growing urban corridor between New York, Philadelphia and Washington D.C. This corridor is one of the leading industrial and commercial trade regions of the United States. Fleetwood lies in the southern portion of Richmond Township and is surrounded by the Township on three sides with Ruscombmanor Township being its southern border. Richmond Township is bordered by Greenwich Township to the north, Maxatawny Township to the northeast, Lyons Borough and Rockland Township to the southeast, Ruscombmanor Township to the south and Perry Township to the northwest. Maidencreek Township’s is bordered by Richmond Township on the eastern side, Ruscombmanor and Muhlenberg Township on the southern side, Ontelaunee Township to the west and Perry Township to the north. -
Equality and Diversity Annual Report - 2017/18 All Different: All Bournemouth University
Equality and Diversity Annual Report - 2017/18 All Different: All Bournemouth University @EqualityatBU Equality and Diversity at BU wakelet.com/@equalityatbu www.bournemouth.ac.uk/diversity 1. Foreword We are pleased to introduce the Annual Equality and Diversity report which covers academic year 2017/18. During this year we have seen continued engagement in equality, both internally and externally via our planned programme of work. We have continued to work across all elements of equality, we have placed increased emphasis on Wellbeing (including mental health), Gender, through Athena SWAN, Equal and Gender Pay and Race, (via the work towards the Race Equality Charter), increasing the progression of Black Minority Ethnic (BME) staff and closing the BME attainment gap for students. We have continued to work in partnership with a range of stakeholders, including AFC Bournemouth, Dorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust, Intercom Trust, Access Dorset and the wider community. A number of prominent people have supported our equality agenda by sharing their experiences at key events which have helped raise the profile and reduce the stigma attached to elements of the equality agenda. These speakers have included, Frank Bruno MBE and the LGBT speaker, activist and broadcaster Sophie Cook. It is really pleasing to receive national recognition by the Equality Challenge Unit for our case study raising awareness of mental health issues. Work has commenced to raise student awareness of hate crime and the sources of support within and outside BU. The department for Media Production achieved a Bronze Athena SWAN award in recognition of its gender equality work, and we have submitted our application for our Athena SWAN bronze award under the new charter in November 2018.