UK Justice Policy Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UK Justice Policy Review UK Justice Policy Review Volume 7 From Brexit referendum to General Election 24 June 2016 to 8 June 2017 by Richard Garside, Roger Grimshaw and Matt Ford UK Justice Policy Review Volume 7 From Brexit referendum to General Election 24 June 2016 to 8 June 2017 by Richard Garside, Roger Grimshaw and Matt Ford About the authors Richard Garside is Director, Roger Grimshaw is Research Director, and Matt Ford is Research Analyst, all at the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. Acknowledgements Without the generous support of The Hadley Trust this publication would not have been possible. We thank them for their support for this series. Thank you to Tammy McGloughlin and Neala Hickey for their production work and to Steve Swingler our designer. Registered charity No. 251588 A company limited by guarantee Registered in England No. 496821 Centre for Crime and Justice Studies 2 Langley Lane Vauxhall London SW8 1GB [email protected] www.crimeandjustice.org.uk ©Centre for Crime and Justice Studies June 2018 ISBN: 978-1-906003-65-4 UK Justice Policy Review: Volume 7 24 June 2016 to 8 June 2017 2 Contents Executive summary 4 Introduction 6 Speeches 8 Legislation 12 Police 14 Data dashboard 20 Courts and access to justice 22 Prisons 26 Probation 32 Coming up: after the General Election 36 Technical appendix 38 CENTRE FOR CRIME AND JUSTICE STUDIES 3 Executive summary Overview Act, the Prison and Courts Bill, the Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and This is the seventh volume in the UK Justice Domestic Violence (Ratification of Convention) Policy Review series, covering the period from Act, the Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Bill, the the referendum on the UK’s membership of the Limitation (Childhood Abuse) (Scotland) Bill, and European Union in June 2016 to the snap General the Railway Policing (Scotland) Bill. The Northern Election in June 2017. It assesses and explains Ireland Assembly was not sitting for much of this criminal justice developments across the United period and no relevant legislation was passed. Kingdom’s three criminal jurisdictions of England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Police This Review, like previous editions, focuses on the key criminal justice institutions of policing, This section gives an overview of key the courts and access to justice, prisons, and developments in policing across the criminal probation across the UK. It combines concise, justice jurisdictions of the UK. It begins with an critical analysis of policy developments with key analysis of the rise in hate crime following the data on the main trends. Brexit referendum and terror attacks in London and Manchester. Policy responses to hate and Speeches vulnerability in each jurisdiction are then covered. The first section covers four speeches made The rest of this section discusses issues around by leading politicians in each jurisdiction. This the scrutiny and accountability of the police, includes two contrasting speeches on criminal including: developments around historic justice reform, one by the former England and controversies surrounding South Yorkshire Wales Justice Secretary Liz Truss, and the other Police; the inquiry into police spying; ongoing by the former Northern Ireland Justice Minister problems with the practice of stop and search; Claire Sugden. how complaints about the police are handled; Similarly contrasting speeches on police reform by and developments in police governance. Debates Scottish Justice Secretary Michael Matheson and around police numbers and funding, which gained by the former Home Secretary Amber Rudd are renewed energy during the General Election also examined. period, are covered at the end of this section. Legislation Data dashboard This section covers key legislation that passed The data dashboard shows changes in criminal through the UK parliament and the devolved justice expenditure, staffing levels and the number assemblies during the period under review. of people criminalised and subject to various This includes: the Criminal Finances Act, the criminal justice sanctions, in each jurisdiction Investigatory Powers Act, the Policing and Crime between the review year and 2012/13 and 2016/17. UK Justice Policy Review: Volume 7 24 June 2016 to 8 June 2017 4 Courts Probation The section on courts begins by charting Liz Truss’ The section on probation begins by tracking the short but gaffe-prone tenure as Justice Secretary implementation of the beleaguered Transforming for England and Wales. Further developments in Rehabilitation reforms in England and Wales the drive to digitise aspects of court proceedings during the year in review. Newer arrangements and move away from physical courts are then in Scotland, following the reorganisation of highlighted. This includes an infographic community justice in 2016, are contrasted with highlighting the large-scale programme of court those of England and Wales. Activity around how closures in all three jurisdictions on page 23. probation work in Northern Ireland was used to prevent reconviction and avoid short prison This section goes on to describe how cuts to sentences are covered at the end of this section. legal aid have continued to be implemented An infographic on page 35 shows the different and examines their impact across the three reconviction rates in England and Wales, Scotland UK jurisdictions. Declines in the numbers and Northern Ireland. of magistrates and cases going through the magistrates’ courts, as well as debates around increasing their sentencing powers, are outlined. Coming up The final section previews some of the main Prisons elements that will be covered in more detail in the next edition of UKJPR. This includes: The section on prisons covers developments in The reverberations of the 2017 General each jurisdiction separately. Key elements of the Election, including the Conservative loss reform agenda for England and Wales set out in of its parliamentary majority and the lack the White Paper, Prison Safety and Reform, as well of legislative activity. The formation of Her as its uneven implementation, are highlighted. Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service and Page 27 includes an infographic giving an the effects of continuing increases in resource overview of all six areas covered by the White demands in prisons. Intense scrutiny of the Paper. probation reorganisation in England and Wales. In Scotland key developments include the Accountability issues surrounding the new police progress of ambitious plans to reconfigure the complaints body, the UK National Preventive women’s custodial estate and concerns about the Mechanism and the refusal of the Scottish Justice state of healthcare in Scottish prisons. Levels of Secretary to extend the police spying inquiry to safety in prisons are assessed through inspection Scotland. Questions over the sustainability of reports and reviews in each jurisdiction during the continued spending cuts; and the implications of year in review. Brexit on criminal justice policy. CENTRE FOR CRIME AND JUSTICE STUDIES 5 Introduction From Brexit referendum to General relationship? Here we take forward the story of Election the exceptional focus that prevailed in this period upon what the future might hold. This edition of UK Justice Policy Review (UKJPR) EU cooperation in justice and security covers covers the period between the ‘Brexit’ referendum a number of fields (seeEU cooperation). The on 23 June 2016, and the 8 June 2017 General UK’s approach to EU justice measures involved Election. selective ‘opt-ins’ rather than full participation. On 13 July 2016 the new Prime Minister, Theresa The government subsequently expressed a wish to May gave a speech setting out her vision for maintain a close relationship with EU institutions. Britain. How she came to her new position By refusing to accept the jurisdiction of the Court is a story directly related to the result of the of Justice of the EU in the future, the government referendum, which had led to the resignation of was faced with the question about how disputes David Cameron. With a new government came might be settled once the UK departed. new challenges and responsibilities, chief among Under the Scotland Act 1998, policing and them: to face the consequences of the referendum criminal justice were devolved matters, with and to chart a new path in Europe. some exceptions such as terrorism. While the Theresa May spoke of leading a ‘one-nation’ UK government sets the direction of the UK’s government and tackling injustices, including relation with EU justice, the Scottish government discrimination in criminal justice. Her broad has a voice, pointing out how a common justice statement of intent opened a fresh chapter in policy is complementary to the development policy discussions. The enormity and complexity of a European market. Sections of the justice of the Brexit task quickly overwhelmed the system in Scotland have been direct participants government, preventing many potential policy in EU justice institutions: for example, the Crown initiatives, including in the area of criminal Office and Procurator Fiscal Service has been justice, at least in England and Wales. The represented in the UK’s Eurojust oversight board; collapse of power-sharing in Northern Ireland in a Police Scotland officer has been assigned to the early 2017 brought the ongoing criminal justice Europol Liaison Office in The Hague. reform programme to a juddering halt. During If the result of the referendum was unexpected, it this period, it was only Scotland that had a added a completely new dimension to the policy government that could claim to be ‘strong and scene in the period under review. Not surprisingly stable’. there was no shortage of high-level inquiries dedicated to Brexit. Implications of the Brexit decision for criminal justice In Scotland a national Summit on EU Justice was convened in November 2016, at which This review begins at the moment when the EU Scotland’s relationships with agencies such as referendum decision signalled an impending Europol, and access to measures such as the withdrawal from the EU.
Recommended publications
  • Letter 13 October 2016 to Rt Hon Boris Johnson, Foreign Secretary
    International Development Committee House of Commons, London, SW1 A OAA • Tel: 020 7219 1223 Email: [email protected] Website: www.parliament.uk/indcom From Stephen Twigg MP, Chair Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Foreign and Commonwealth Office 13 October 2016 Follow-up to emergency debate on Syria and Aleppo Dear Boris, Further to the debate on Tuesday on 'Aleppo and Syria' I am writing to seek detailed answers to questions I raised. These questions arise from the International Development Committee's work. I am copying in Priti Patel and Amber Rudd as some of my questions relate to DFID and Home Office responsibilities. You may be aware the Committee published a Report on the Syrian refugee crisis in January of this year. 1 We recommended the Government should resettle 3,000 unaccompanied children from Europe in addition to the commitment to resettle 20,000 refugees from the region (para 63). It should also carry out resettlement quickly (para 65). In May 2016 in response to the amendments put forward by Lord Dubs to the Immigration Bill the Government announced that "Unaccompanied asylum-seeking children will be resettled from Greece, Italy and France" .2 The Immigration Act 2016 contained commitments that: 1. The Secretary of State must, as soon as possible after the passing of this Act, make arrangements to relocate to the United Kingdom and support a specified number of unaccompanied refugee children from other countries in Europe. 2. The number of children to be resettled under subsection (1) shall be determined by the Government in consultation with local authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Group's Report on Family Justice
    Review of Civil and Family Justice in Northern Ireland Review Group’s Report on Family Justice 171275 Judicial Studies Board_FNL (spne_11.5mm)cvr sprd_(A)__1.indd 1-3 11/08/2017 11:12 171275 Judicial Studies Board_FNL (spne_11.5mm)cvr sprd_(A)__1.indd 4-6 11/08/2017 11:12 Review of Civil and Family Justice in Northern Ireland Review Group’s Report on Family Justice September 2017 This is a Report by the Review Group, unless otherwise indicated. This is the approach that was agreed with the Group. We recommend that the Report, and the preliminary Report, be read in electronic rather than paper form. This will facilitate using the links. First published in 2017 by the Office of the Lord Chief Justice © Office of the Lord Chief Justice, 2017 Printed in Northern Ireland by CDS Print and Creative ii Contents (Click on heading to go to that page) Preface v Key recommendations ix 1 Introduction 1 2 Current context 11 3 Current system 16 4 International context 18 5 Single-tier system 23 6 Private law proceedings 29 7 Resolutions outside court 47 8 Divorce proceedings in Northern Ireland 60 9 Ancillary relief 68 10 Public law system 80 11 Secure accommodation orders 99 12 Problem-solving courts 107 13 Child abduction 115 14 Paperless courts 127 15 Disclosure 140 16 Voice of the child and vulnerable adults 143 17 Court setting 158 18 Open justice 162 19 Personal litigants 180 20 Family Justice Board 194 21 Conclusion 202 Appendix 1 Terms of reference 205 Appendix 2 Family statistics (October 2015) 209 iii Appendix 3 Family Bar Association civil justice review research 210 Appendix 4 New Zealand Care of Children Act 2004, s.
    [Show full text]
  • ANDREW MARR SHOW 9TH JUNE 2019 ESTHER MCVEY AM: Do You
    1 ESTHER MCVEY ANDREW MARR SHOW 9TH JUNE 2019 ESTHER MCVEY AM: Do you think, Esther McVey, that it makes a difference that you have a very different background – you didn’t go to Eton and all the rest of it – how would it feel different to have a woman of your background leading the Conservative Party? EM: Well, our party is a broad church. It always has been. It’s about meritocracy. And for me, our party’s also about social mobility. It’s about anybody can come from anywhere and achieve the highest post in the land, so long as they are prepared to work hard enough, so long as they can get a good team together and so long as you’ve got a vision that reaches out to the country. And that’s why I’m travelling the country all the time as part of a pub road show with blue collar Conservatives to really hear what people want us to do. Once we’ve delivered Brexit, what do they want after that? And they want money in schools, they want money going to police and they also, which I’ve announced today, is the public sector pay guarantee, because people want to know that they’re going to have a fair crack of the whip too. AM: But we’re not there yet. We’re not out of the EU yet. And your position on that is essentially that there’s not going to be another negotiation, they’re not really going to renegotiate, so we have to be prepared to leave at the end of October with no deal, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fresh Start? the Northern Ireland Assembly Election 2016
    A fresh start? The Northern Ireland Assembly election 2016 Matthews, N., & Pow, J. (2017). A fresh start? The Northern Ireland Assembly election 2016. Irish Political Studies, 32(2), 311-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2016.1255202 Published in: Irish Political Studies Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2016 Taylor & Francis. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:30. Sep. 2021 A fresh start? The Northern Ireland Assembly election 2016 NEIL MATTHEWS1 & JAMES POW2 Paper prepared for Irish Political Studies Date accepted: 20 October 2016 1 School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Correspondence address: School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies, University of Bristol, 11 Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • JP Brexit Newsletter
    Brexit Newsletter - vol.82 Deloitte UK 20th November 2018 Overview Theresa May May 2 Brexit Contact us: /Hiromasa Hidaka May 11 14 JSG UK Brexit Leader Tax Director Tel: +44 (0)20 7007 6589 Email: [email protected] 300 EU EU ------------------------------------------- /Masashi Niwa 100 Consulting Partner Tel: +44 (0)20 7007 5630 Email: [email protected] EU ------------------------------------------- /Yukihiro Otani Banking and Capital Markets Partner EU Tel: +44 (0)20 7007 2024 Email: [email protected] /Yusuke Miura Banking and Capital Markets Senior Manager Tel: +44 (0)20 7303 2829 EU Email: [email protected] ------------------------------------------- EU /Koji Ishikawa EU JSG Partner Tel: +44 (0)20 7007 2067 Email: [email protected] / Megumu Tanaka EU EU JSG Senior Manager Tel: +44 (0)20 7303 8447 Email: [email protected] / Yuichi Kubota JSG Senior Manager Tel: +44 (0)20 7007 9850 Email: [email protected] JSG Manager Tel: +44 (0)20 7007 9778 Email: [email protected] 1998 Good Friday SBA EU EU EU 7 EU 2020 Brexit EU Brexit EU Michael Barnier Brussels EU27 27 EU 2022 12 6 EU Dominic Raab EU Esther McVey Jacob Rees-Mogg 1922 Theresa May Michael Gove Liam Fox May EU Donald Tusk EU 11 25 Brexit EU Angela Merkel Emmanuel Macron IMF EU GDP 6 2018 7 9 EU 1997 Deloitte LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC303675 and its registered office at 1 New Street Square, London, EC4A 3BZ, United Kingdom. Deloitte LLP is the United Kingdom affiliate of Deloitte NWE LLP, a member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Supreme Court Ruling
    Reflections on the Supreme Court Ruling By Professor Alex de Ruyter, Director, Centre for Brexit Studies Today’s landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the UK has sent yet more shock waves through the British political landscape. The decision is particularly notable in its verdict in that the prorogation by the UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, having been found to be unlawful, should be “remedied” by the Speaker of the House of Commons, John Bercow. In so doing, the Court noted the supreme principle of Parliamentary sovereignty in the UK, and of the essential function that Parliament exerted on the UK Government in terms of “scrutiny” and “accountability”. Bercow has since stated the Parliament must reconvene as soon as possible, and that it will sit at 11.30am tomorrow to reconvene. But here I want to consider the practical implications, and in particular, what this will mean for Johnson’s tenure as Prime Minster, and indeed of the trajectory of Brexit itself. As yet the PM has not responded, and reports suggest that he will “take his time” in doing so. Despite his public posturing, I suspect the verdict will still have come as a shock to him, and a “rude interruption” to his schedule in New York at the UN General Assembly. On the issue of Johnson’s tenure as PM, despite growing calls for him to “reconsider his position” as PM he cannot simply be forced to resign – in reinforcing the principle of Parliamentary sovereignty the Court has made it possible for Parliament to reconvene earlier. However, Johnson would still be PM, and he could only be removed from office via a successful motion of No Confidence in his government.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of the Northern Ireland Executive How Is the Northern Ireland Executive Selected?
    Role of the Northern Ireland Executive How is the Northern Ireland Executive selected? Under the Good Friday Agreement after the Assembly elections ministers for the Executive are appointed by the Assembly using the using the d’Hondt System, which allocates seats on the Executive based on the number of seats parties win in the Assembly elections. The more MLA’s a party has, the more Ministers it can appoint, with the largest parties getting the first choices when it comes to ministerial roles on the Executive. The Justice Minister is not appointed using d'Hondt but is elected by the Assembly and must have cross- community support, ie, from both unionists and nationalists. What is the role Northern Ireland Executive in decision making? The Executive Committee meets in Stormont Castle. Its work is co-ordinated by the First and deputy First Minister. Ministers are responsible for day to day government decisions within their own areas of responsibility. They meet as the Executive Committee to draw up the draft Budget and the draft Programme for Government (PfG) which have to be approved by the Assembly. Ministers on the Executive are responsible for decision making in Departments which include: Executive Office - First Minister and deputy First Minister Department for Communities, Department for the Economy, Department of Health, Department of Education Department of Finance Department of Justice, Department for Infrastructure Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs Who has sat on the Northern Ireland Executive? Michelle McIlveen Peter Weir Michelle O’Neill Claire Sugden Agriculture/ Education Health Justice Environment 2016-17 2016-2017 2016- 2017 2016-2017 Leaving Certificate Politics & Society Stand 1: Power and Decision Making Topic 2: Power and Decision Making at National and European Level.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Theresa May - the Prime Minister
    Contents Theresa May - The Prime Minister .......................................................................................................... 5 Nancy Astor - The first female Member of Parliament to take her seat ................................................ 6 Anne Jenkin - Co-founder Women 2 Win ............................................................................................... 7 Margaret Thatcher – Britain’s first woman Prime Minister .................................................................... 8 Penny Mordaunt – First woman Minister of State for the Armed Forces at the Ministry of Defence ... 9 Lucy Baldwin - Midwifery and safer birth campaigner ......................................................................... 10 Hazel Byford – Conservative Women’s Organisation Chairman 1990 - 1993....................................... 11 Emmeline Pankhurst – Leader of the British Suffragette Movement .................................................. 12 Andrea Leadsom – Leader of House of Commons ................................................................................ 13 Florence Horsbrugh - First woman to move the Address in reply to the King's Speech ...................... 14 Helen Whately – Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party ............................................................. 15 Gillian Shephard – Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers ............................................... 16 Dorothy Brant – Suffragette who brought women into Conservative Associations ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Work and Pensions Committee House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA Tel 020 7219 8976 Email [email protected]
    Work and Pensions Committee House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA Tel 020 7219 8976 Email [email protected] From the Chair 8 August 2019 Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA Dear Prime Minister, The Work and Pensions Committee recently took evidence on the role of the welfare system in the case of an economic recession.1 The Bank of England’s recent GDP projections show a 30% risk of negative GDP growth in 2020.2 The Governor of the Bank of England has also been quoted as saying that a no-deal Brexit would be an “instantaneous shock” to the UK economy. Might you please answer the following questions on the Government’s preparations for a potential future recession or economic shock? The way that legacy benefits, such as tax credits, would operate as an ‘automatic stabiliser’ in the case of a recession is relatively well-understood. The Chairman of the Office for Budget Responsibility observed, however, that it is unclear if Universal Credit would operate in the same way, partly because of the conditionality regime.3 1. Has the Government undertaken any recent modelling of the effect of a recession or economic shock on welfare spending in general, or Universal Credit spending in particular? If so, please would you share the assumptions and results with the Committee? 2. Has the Government undertaken any analysis or planning of how Universal Credit would operate in a recession? a. Would the Government make changes to the conditionality regime in response to a material change in economic conditions? The OBR told us that recessions could vary in character, with different effects on price inflation, average earnings and employment rates.4 Universal Credit was designed so that the work allowance and taper rate could be varied in response to different economic conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Referendum 2016 V7
    EU Referendum 2016 Three Scenarios for the Government An insights and analysis briefing from The Whitehouse Consultancy Issues-led communications 020 7463 0690 [email protected] whitehouseconsulting.co.uk The EU Referendum The EU referendum has generated an unparalleled level of political If we vote to leave, a new Prime Minister will likely emerge from among debate in the UK, the result of which is still too close to call. Although the 'Leave' campaigners. What is questionable is whether Mr Cameron we cannot make any certain predictions, this document draws upon will stay in position to deal with the immediate questions posed by Whitehouse’s political expertise and media analysis to suggest what Brexit: such as the timetable for withdrawal, or how trading and may happen to the Government’s composition in the event of: diplomatic relations will proceed. Will he remain at Number 10, perhaps • A strong vote to remain (by 8% or more); until a party conference in the autumn, or will there be more than one new beginning? • A weak vote in favour of remaining (by up to 8%); or • A vote to leave. “The result could create If the UK chooses to remain by a wide margin, the subsequent reshue will aord an opportunity to repair the Conservative Party after a a new political reality.” bruising campaign period. This result will prompt a flurry of It is clear that the referendum result could create a new political reality on parliamentary activity, renewing the Prime Minister’s mandate until he 24 June. Businesses must be prepared to engage if they are to mitigate the stands down closer to 2020 and enable a continuation of the impacts and take advantage of the opportunities presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Theresa May Is Trying to Stay Afloat on Brexit, but She Keeps Finding Herself in a Hole
    First published in The Telegraph, 15 May 2018 and by the ESRC’s UK in a Changing Europe programme, 17 May 2018 Theresa May is trying to stay afloat on Brexit, but she keeps finding herself in a hole All major politicians sooner or later find themselves in a hole of their own making. Even if they don’t make mistakes, they will fall into an elephant trap dug by their opponents. There are three laws to follow when in a hole: stop digging; keep afloat; and watch out for someone pulling the plug and sending you down the drain. First law The first law, stop digging, means first check the facts. After all, maybe you are in a hole for good reason. Amber Rudd failed to do so and had to resign after issuing a denial that was buried by evidence. Peter Mandelson’s first cabinet resignation is another classic example. Another error is trying to climb out of the hole with a rope ladder made of cover-ups. That tactic was famously adopted by both John Profumo and Richard Nixon but couldn’t take the weight of facts. Donald Trump’s modification is: When you are in a hole, throw mud, false facts or abusive terms which the media will publicise and your friends will cheer. The Brexit negotiations make it difficult for Theresa May to do nothing, as Brussels briefings regularly pour barrowfuls of mud down her hole. If her words don’t begin to make sense in ‘Eurospeak’ as well as in British parliamentary language, the Brussels calendar-clock will keep ticking until she is out of her hole and over the cliff of Brexit without a deal in March next year.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Cabinet Reshuffle
    2014 Cabinet Reshuffle Overview A War Cabinet? Speculation and rumours have been rife over Liberal Democrat frontbench team at the the previous few months with talk that the present time. The question remains if the Prime Minister may undertake a wide scale Prime Minister wishes to use his new look Conservative reshuffle in the lead up to the Cabinet to promote the Government’s record General Election. Today that speculation was in this past Parliament and use the new talent confirmed. as frontline campaigners in the next few months. Surprisingly this reshuffle was far more extensive than many would have guessed with "This is very much a reshuffle based on the Michael Gove MP becoming Chief Whip and upcoming election. Out with the old, in William Hague MP standing down as Foreign with the new; an attempt to emphasise Secretary to become Leader of the House of diversity and put a few more Eurosceptic Commons. Women have also been promoted faces to the fore.” to the new Cameron Cabinet, although not to the extent that the media suggested. Liz Truss Dr Matthew Ashton, politics lecturer- MP and Nicky Morgan MP have both been Nottingham Trent University promoted to Secretary of State for Environment and Education respectively, whilst Esther McVey MP will now attend Europe Cabinet in her current role as Minister for Employment. Many other women have been Surprisingly Lord Hill, Leader for the promoted to junior ministry roles including Conservatives in the House of Lords, has been Priti Patel MP to the Treasury, Amber Rudd chosen as the Prime Minister’s nomination for MP to DECC and Claire Perry MP to European Commissioner in the new Junker led Transport, amongst others.
    [Show full text]