Political Violence, the State and the Anti-State

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Political Violence, the State and the Anti-State TaLkingPoiNts aldo, Isis International Manila T Mayang Political Violence, The State and the Anti-State by Miriam Coronel Ferrer This paper discusses the Philippine context of a state facing off with socialist revolutionary groups threatening its power. However, the typical solution is violence, specially now that the government’s anti- communist stance is now re-stated as anti-terrorism. Meanwhile, anti-state forces also use violence to challenge state power. 66 Talking Points No.2 2006 WOMEN IN ACTION 7 5 For centuries, national security Reports of de facto curfews, arbitrary options of states straddled between two searches, harassment, imposition of the approaches: one based on power, the cedula, and mopping up operations, reflect other based on peace. The first option, that the classic counter-insurgency power, may be better said as “power approach of draining the fish of its over” or the principle of domination water continues. To suffocate the fish, over the groups posing a challenge to the water is contained, drained or the state—its policies, actions, and more rendered unable to resist military fundamentally, its nature. “Power over,” pressure. at the minimum, aims to neutralise, and at the maximum exterminate, eliminate, These methods have been referred to subjugate contending forces in the name as “collective impact measures.” This of the state and its desired attributes— type of measures intends to hurt the sovereignty, stability, survival. At a populace in order to render them glance, this approach seems to be the submissive. A local resident who gets only logical option for a weak state, killed in the process is seen as collateral whose very weakness forces it to make damage to the intent. a show of being strong. Collective impact measures also function The second approach is peace—that is, as “collective punishment.” Residents to seek peace as a precondition to and/ are scolded and threatened for acts or an outcome of security. This deemed sympathetic to the enemy. In approach is founded on the core values general assemblies recently held in of tolerance, pluralism, and dialogue, the Central Luzon by the military under exact opposite of the values in the first General Jovito Palparan, a former approach: intolerance, exclusivity, brute commander of the Philippine Army, force and monologue. It involves state- residents are beseeched and courted, building through much needed reforms. entertained with songs and sexy dancers Its guiding principle is “do no (more) in exchange for their sympathies. They harm” to the situation as it is. are urged to speak out despite the asymmetry in the situation: unarmed, Collective impact measures poor farmers facing fully armed lieutenants, colonels, and generals. But What we have been witnessing in the when they speak out and complain of Philippines in the last years is an internal abuses of government soldiers, they are security approach founded on the state’s reprimanded and accused of being attempt to dominate and subjugate “influenced” by the insurgents or by critical socio-political forces. Its guiding being members of the New Peoples principle is precisely to “do harm”. Army (NPA). They become the brunt It incorporates the usual military of displaced aggression, the easy target operations against communist guerillas of traumatised soldiers faced with operating in the countryside. Such an elusive “enemies.” approach relies heavily on the Philippine The unprecedented high number of army entailing the participation of state killings of political activists in the agencies. Philippines associated with national 6 7 democratic organisations as well as other its norms, polarise, and desensitise. They The society left-wing groups in compressed time is provide fodder to counter-violence, and endures a part of this “collective punishment” diminish faith in the system and peaceful frame. The extrajudicial killings share the change. They are sure-fire formulas for high level of same features of rural community-based greater violence. They are our own criminal counter-guerilla warfare: indiscriminate “low-tech” version of weapons of mass or dismissive of the distinction between destruction which nonetheless leads to violence, combatants and non-combatants, and the same MAD-ness or “mutually and delivery clouded by “hate language” and assured destruction.” The victory they demonisation of the enemy. A slight lay claim is short-term, flaky, and one- of socio- difference is that the killings are sided. somewhat disguised: they are not done economic by men in military uniform, whereas the Multi-Layered Contexts usual counter-insurgency is marked by goods is There are multi-layered contexts on this troops descending in communities who intensified state violence against a certain limited. Its seek security and cover in numbers. institutions are social force, its various apparatuses, but The killings’ desired impact is the same: ultimately, violence or assault on the flawed; its fear, paralysis, scuttling of the citizens at large. organisational network, albeit not just in infrastructure, One context is the short term: President the local but the national sense. The goal Gloria Macapagal Arroyo’s (GMA) is to break the political infrastructure deteriorating political survival. or destroyed. of the movement whose good showing in the past election under the party list The long and short of this context is system and corresponding access to pork the legitimacy question raised against her barrel funds were, from the point of administration. Here, the national view of the anti-communist state, democratic left has played a major role, alarming. National politics is after all whether in the attempts at setting off the bigger pond where the fish swim. an impeachment process or in military But here the instructions are straight to coup-cum-street protests that will force the point: kill the fish. GMA to step down. The national democratic left has also put blocks to In this power-based approach attempts of the government to manifested in collective punitive strengthen its emergency powers or measures, victory is easy to measure. insulate the presidency from the checks One is through body count: how many powers in the hands of Congress and are dead and wounded? Another is the citizens. through weapons count: how many weapons were seized? The final measure It is to the GMA presidency’s interest is on the number of communities, to weaken the multiple machineries of organisations, and people neutralized. the national democratic left through both judicial and extra-judicial means. It is to Collective impact measures create more GMA’s interest to reward the loyalty of problems due to the social tensions and key state players crucial to her political resentment they generate in the survival, notably, the military, the police communities and the affected public. and the members of Congress. It is in They erode the fabric of society, confuse her interest to join the “coalition of the 8 6 Talking Points No.2 2006 WOMEN IN ACTION willing” and the US-led global fight What is a failed state? Rotberg (2004) against terrorism in order to get the describes it as one marked by enduring backing and material support of US violence, though not necessarily always President Bush. In this regard, the GMA of high level of intensity. It is tense, administration actively lobbied for the deeply conflicted, dangerous and inclusion of the Communist Party of contested bitterly by warring factions, the Philippines (CPP)-NPA in the list of with varieties of civil unrest and two or terrorist organisations of the US and more insurgencies, different degrees of European bodies – even though the communal discontent and other forms CPP-NPA does not as a rule employ of dissent directed against it and at terrorist methods like bombings. groups within it. Parts of the territory, notably the peripheral regions, are not But beyond the GMA presidency is the under its control. There is a high level state of affairs of the Philippine state – of physical insecurity among citizens, the more important, larger context. This thus they are armed or they join rebel is a question that will transcend GMA, groups. The society endures a high level and is related to but distorted by the of criminal violence, and delivery of partisan peddling of charter change. This socio-economic goods is limited. Its is the specter of not just a weak state institutions are flawed; its infrastructure, but of a disintegrating, failing state, one deteriorating or destroyed. where governance increasingly becomes unstable and short-sighted, and reforms The more recent line from General impossible. The prospects of a failed Palparan, said over one television state result from the transgressions of program recently, is almost a tacit the Marcos administration that the recognition of the situation of the country has inherited and how its political Philippines as a failing state. Only in such elites have selfishly played their games a state can his explanation for the killings in this situation. It is the bigger context make sense. According to Palparan, the where the wanton use of state violence killings are perpetuated by people taking by both civilian and political leaders, and vengeance on the NPA for the latter’s the military’s privileged role in national abuses. Queried if these people include security and national politics have soldiers, he replied in the positive, saying become even more ominous. such soldiers are probably taking revenge for the death of other soldiers. If the state were a viable state, can this kind of anarchy and lame excuse be palpable? This is the specter of not just a weak Anti-communism and state but of a disintegrating, failing anti-terrorism state, one where governance Anti-communism as the ideological increasingly becomes unstable and foundation of and justification for the state’s excessive use of violence remains. short-sighted, and reforms The language of anti-terrorism adds a impossible.
Recommended publications
  • Of Auxiliary Forces and Private Armies: Security Sector Governance (SSG) and Conflict Management in Maguindanao, Mindanao
    The RSIS Working Paper series presents papers in a preliminary form and serves to stimulate comment and discussion. The views expressed in this publication are entirely those of the author(s), and do not represent the official position of RSIS. If you have any comments, please send them to [email protected]. Unsubscribing If you no longer want to receive RSIS Working Papers, please click on “Unsubscribe” to be removed from the list. No. 267 Of Auxiliary Forces and Private Armies: Security Sector Governance (SSG) and Conflict Management in Maguindanao, Mindanao Maria Anna Rowena Luz G. Layador S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Singapore 16 January 2014 This working paper is an outcome of a research initiative on the theme ‘Responding to Internal Crises and Their Cross Border Effects’ led by the Centre for Non-Traditional Security (NTS) Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS). The initiative was organised around related sub-themes, each of which was addressed by a research group comprising selected scholars from across Southeast Asia. This paper emerged from work by the research group focused on ‘Bridging Multilevel and Multilateral Approaches to Conflict Prevention and Resolution: Security Sector Governance and Conflict Management in Southeast Asia’. This project was supported by the MacArthur Foundation’s Asia Security Initiative (ASI). For more information on the ASI, please visit http://www.asicluster3.com. i About RSIS The S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) was established in January 2007 as an autonomous School within the Nanyang Technological University. Known earlier as the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies when it was established in July 1996, RSIS‟ mission is to be a leading research and graduate teaching institution in strategic and international affairs in the Asia Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Human Rights in the Philippines 2012
    The State of Human Rights in the Philippines in 2012 AHRC-SPR-009-2012 PHILIPPINES: The State of Human Rights in 2012 Strong rights, No remedy The discourse on protection of rights this year in the Philippines has been unique. Rights that were not previously recognized are now recognized; public officials and security officers, who could not be prosecuted even in one’s imagination, were prosecuted; and victims and their families, who often chose to keep silent due to fear and oppression, now seek remedies demanding their rights. This phenomenon is taking many forms, offering enormous prospects for the protection of rights. To cite a few examples: the conviction of Renato Corona, former chief justice, following a widely publicized impeachment trial, has given rise to the discourse on judicial accountability. The prosecution of former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and her former General Jovito Palparan, who is now a fugitive, for corruption and abduction of student activists respectively, has given rise to the prospect that public and security officials who breached public trust and committed human violations in the past, can now be prosecuted. Also, that a group of people—particularly the Muslims in the south—who had been subject to systematic and widespread subjugation for many decades, would now agree on creating a political entity under the same sovereignty which it fought against, is further evidence of confidence in the government. The Bangsamoro Framework Agreement (BFA), signed between the rebel group and the government on October 15, 2012, is a historic development, which offers the prospect, not only of peace emerging from decades of conflict in Mindanao, but also of the building of democratic institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • July 17, 2013 His Excellency Benigno S. Aquino III President, Republic Of
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10118-3299 Tel: 212-290-4700 Fax: 212-736-1300 Fax: 917-591-3452 July 17, 2013 His Excellency Benigno S. Aquino III ASIA DIVISION Brad Adams, Executive Director President, Republic of the Philippines Phelim Kine, Deputy Director Sophie Richardson, China Director Malacanang Palace, Manila John Sifton, Advocacy Director Phil Robertson, Deputy Director Via facsimile Kanae Doi, Japan Director Meenakshi Ganguly, South Asia Director Via email Ali Dayan Hasan, Pakistan Director Mickey Spiegel, Special Advisor Nicholas Bequelin, Senior Researcher David Mathieson, Senior Researcher Re: State of the Nation Address and Human Rights Sunai Phasuk, Senior Researcher Jayshree Bajoria, Researcher Heather Barr, Researcher Carlos H. Conde, Researcher Dear President Aquino, Andreas Harsono, Researcher Tejshree Thapa, Researcher Kriti Sharma, Coordinator Jake Scobey-Thal, Senior Associate Congratulations on the completion of the first half of your six-year Riyo Yoshioka, Senior Associate Shaivalini Parmar, Associate term in office as the President of the Republic of the Philippines. We Storm Tiv, Associate look forward to working with your administration to improve human ADVISORY COMMITTEE rights protections in the Philippines during your remaining three David Lakhdhir, Chair Orville Schell, Vice Chair years in office. Maureen Aung-Thwin Edward J. Baker Robbie Barnett Robert L. Bernstein Human Rights Watch commends you for progress in some key areas Jagdish Bhagwati Jerome Cohen in the past three years. We note that your administration enacted Gerald Curtis John Despres important legislation on human rights, among them the laws on Jose Manuel Diokno Mallika Dutt reproductive health, enforced disappearances, reparation for human Merle Goldman Jonathan Hecht rights victims under the Marcos dictatorship, and protecting the Paul Hoffman Sharon Hom rights of domestic workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Scared Silent RIGHTS Impunity for Extrajudicial Killings in the Philippines WATCH June 2007 Volume 19, No
    The Philippines HUMAN Scared Silent RIGHTS Impunity for Extrajudicial Killings in the Philippines WATCH June 2007 Volume 19, No. 9(C) Scared Silent Impunity for Extrajudicial Killings in the Philippines I. Summary............................................................................................................. 1 II. Methods.............................................................................................................7 III. Recent Military Relations with Government and Civil Society ...............................8 Military involvement in politics............................................................................. 8 Military campaign against the New People’s Army ...............................................10 The military and leftist political and civil society groups ...................................... 11 Recent Developments ......................................................................................... 17 Task Force Usig ...................................................................................................18 Melo Commission ...............................................................................................18 Visit by the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions .................................22 IV. Extrajudicial Executions................................................................................... 25 Extrajudicial executions ......................................................................................28 Pastor Isias de Leon Santa Rosa.......................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • No. 267 of Auxiliary Forces and Private Armies: Security Sector Governance (SSG) and Conflict Management in Maguindanao, Mindan
    The RSIS Working Paper series presents papers in a preliminary form and serves to stimulate comment and discussion. The views expressed in this publication are entirely those of the author(s), and do not represent the official position of RSIS. If you have any comments, please send them to [email protected]. Unsubscribing If you no longer want to receive RSIS Working Papers, please click on “Unsubscribe” to be removed from the list. No. 267 Of Auxiliary Forces and Private Armies: Security Sector Governance (SSG) and Conflict Management in Maguindanao, Mindanao Maria Anna Rowena Luz G. Layador S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Singapore 16 January 2014 This working paper is an outcome of a research initiative on the theme ‘Responding to Internal Crises and Their Cross Border Effects’ led by the Centre for Non-Traditional Security (NTS) Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS). The initiative was organised around related sub-themes, each of which was addressed by a research group comprising selected scholars from across Southeast Asia. This paper emerged from work by the research group focused on ‘Bridging Multilevel and Multilateral Approaches to Conflict Prevention and Resolution: Security Sector Governance and Conflict Management in Southeast Asia’. This project was supported by the MacArthur Foundation’s Asia Security Initiative (ASI). For more information on the ASI, please visit http://www.asicluster3.com. i About RSIS The S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) was established in January 2007 as an autonomous School within the Nanyang Technological University. Known earlier as the Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies when it was established in July 1996, RSIS‟ mission is to be a leading research and graduate teaching institution in strategic and international affairs in the Asia Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • International Labor Rights Forum 2001 S Street NW, Suite 420, Washington, DC 20009
    International Labor Rights Forum 2001 S Street NW, Suite 420, Washington, DC 20009 Testimony of BRIAN CAMPBELL, Attorney, on behalf of the INTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM, April 24, 2009 On behalf of the International Labor Rights Forum, I’d like to thank the Committee for providing us the opportunity to update you about the on-going human rights abuses being suffered by trade union leaders and other human rights advocates in the Philippines. Since we filed the original GSP complaint in 2007, we have seen little change in the Philippines where labor rights continue to be routinely violated by the Government of the Republic of the Philippines, often at the hands of the Armed Forces of the Philippines. Impunity for these crimes remains rampant, and many workers live in fear of being killed, kidnapped, tortured and arbitrarily arrested. After the ILO opened its inquiries into labor and human rights violations in 2006; the UN Special Rapporteur released his findings concerning extra-judicial killings in 2007; and the US Congress conditioned continued military aid to the Philippines on respect for human rights in 2007, there was an immediate drop in the number of killings. Philippine military generals even publicly, though anonymously for fear of retribution, proclaimed that the “Palparan Solution”, named after the General Jovito Palparan who stands accused of orchestrating some of the most egregious human rights crimes, was a failure. Sadly, the decline in human rights abuses was short-lived and, in December 2008, the Philippine Commission on Human Rights (CHR) noted a “resurgence of incidences that violate the right to life, such as killings, summary executions, enforced disappearances and other inimical acts.”1 Between 2007 and the end of 2008, the CHR identified over 142 cases of extrajudicial killings, where “almost all victims .
    [Show full text]
  • Extrajudicial Killings in the Philippines: Strategies to End the Violence Hearing
    S. HRG. 110–290 EXTRAJUDICIAL KILLINGS IN THE PHILIPPINES: STRATEGIES TO END THE VIOLENCE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EAST ASIAN AND PACIFIC AFFAIRS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 14, 2007 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 40–811 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:01 Feb 21, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 PHILIPPINES.TXT sforel1 PsN: sforel1 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware, Chairman CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts CHUCK HAGEL, Nebraska RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin NORM COLEMAN, Minnesota BARBARA BOXER, California BOB CORKER, Tennessee BILL NELSON, Florida JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire BARACK OBAMA, Illinois GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland JIM DEMINT, South Carolina ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., Pennsylvania JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia JIM WEBB, Virginia DAVID VITTER, Louisiana ANTONY J. BLINKEN, Staff Director KENNETH A. MYERS, JR., Republican Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON EAST ASIAN AND PACIFIC AFFAIRS BARBARA BOXER, California, Chairman JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia BARACK OBAMA, Illinois DAVID VITTER, Louisiana JIM WEBB, Virginia CHUCK HAGEL, Nebraska (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 16:01 Feb 21, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 PHILIPPINES.TXT sforel1 PsN: sforel1 CONTENTS Page Boxer, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • NLG Report.Pdf
    Probing Political Persecution, Repression & Human Rights Violations in the Philippines Report of the Women’s Human Rights Delegation May 25th 2006 – June 2nd 2006 Special Update: March 8th, 2007 By: Tina Monshipour Foster, Esq. Rachel Lederman, Esq. Vanessa Lucas, Esq. Judith Mirkinson Merrilyn Onisko, Esq. With the assistance of: Annalisa Enrile & Ninotchka Rosca On behalf of: Center for Constitutional Rights International Association of Democratic Lawyers International Justice Network National Lawyers Guild Sponsored by: GABRIELA Network 1199/SEIU United Healthcare Workers East Vanguard Foundation SEEKING ANSWERS: Authors’ Note about Special Update Report The prior version of this report, Seeking Answers: Probing Political Persecution, Repression & Human Rights Violations in the Philippines, was originally released on September 21, 2006. Since that time, the authors have continued to monitor developments in the Philippines, and have concluded that the human rights crisis in the country has worsened in several respects. This Special Update Report includes the original findings in the Seeking Answers report and incorporates recent developments through February, 2007. Where appropri- ate, the authors have also modified the conclusions and recommendations from those set forth in the original report. We release this new report on March 8, 2007, in honor of International Women’s Day. SEEKING ANSWERS: Probing II. The Prosecution of Ka Bel and Political Persecution, Repression the Batasan 5 and Human Rights Violations in President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, vice president the Philippines (Special Update, under Joseph Estrada, came into office when the March 8, 2007) “People’s Power II” mass demonstrations forced the ouster of Estrada in 2001. It is widely believed that President Arroyo won re-election in 2004 by fraud, and there have been continuing calls for her impeachment.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Extrajudicial Killings and Enforced Disappearances in the Philippines
    Report on Extrajudicial Killings and Enforced Disappearances in the Philippines Fact Finding Mission of Human Rights Now to Philippines Human Rights Now April 2008 1 Summary In the Philippines, hundreds of social activists and human rights defenders have been unlawfully killed as well as subjected to enforced disappearances since the Arroyo Administration came into power. Human Rights Now (HRN), a Tokyo-based international human rights NGO, conducted an investigation of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances in the Philippines on April 14-21, 2007. The fact-finding mission conducted interviews concerning 15 cases of extrajudicial killings (involving 33 victims) and three cases of forced disappearances (involving 9 victims). Additionally, the team conducted interviews to understand the background to the series of human rights violations. In most of the cases investigated, the HRN fact-finding team found that the killings, disappearances, and tortures could be attributed to or could most likely be attributed to the military or police forces of the Philippines. First, among the cases the fact-finding team investigated, in 8 out of 15 cases of extrajudicial killings, the witnesses identified the perpetrators as elements of the AFP or belonging to the CAFGU, the army or paramilitary organization under the control of the army. In two of the three forced disappearance cases, witness and released victims clearly testified about the military’s involvement. Second, all extrajudicial cases have several patterns in common with other cases, such as: (a ) the victims are limited to certain groups, (b) victims were condemned by the government or AFP as “enemy of state” or NPA front, (c) victims were publicly exposing the human rights violations allegedly committed by the AFP, (d) victims were harassed, threatened with death, encouraged by the military to stop their leftist activity, or under persistent surveillance.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Case Study Report on Prevention in the Philippines Here
    International Center for Transitional Justice Disrupting Cycles of Discontent TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AND PREVENTION IN THE PHILIPPINES June 2021 Cover Image: Relatives and friends hold balloons during the funeral of three-year-old Kateleen Myca Ulpina on July 9, 2019, in Rodriguez, Rizal province, Philippines. Ul- pina was shot dead by police officers conducting a drug raid targeting her father. (Ezra Acayan/Getty Images) Disrupting Cycles of Discontent TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE AND PREVENTION IN THE PHILIPPINES Robert Francis B. Garcia JUNE 2021 International Center Disrupting Cycles of Discontent for Transitional Justice About the Research Project This publication is part of an ICTJ comparative research project examining the contributions of tran- sitional justice to prevention. The project includes country case studies on Colombia, Morocco, Peru, the Philippines, and Sierra Leone, as well as a summary report. All six publications are available on ICTJ’s website. About the Author Robert Francis B. Garcia is the founding chairperson of the human rights organization Peace Advocates for Truth, Healing, and Justice (PATH). He currently serves as a transitional justice consultant for the Philippines’ Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and manages Weaving Women’s Narratives, a research and memorialization project based at the Ateneo de Manila University. Bobby is author of the award-winning memoir To Suffer thy Comrades: How the Revolution Decimated its Own, which chronicles his experiences as a torture survivor. Acknowledgments It would be impossible to enumerate everyone who has directly or indirectly contributed to this study. Many are bound to be overlooked. That said, the author would like to mention a few names represent- ing various groups whose input has been invaluable to the completion of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • The New People's Army on Samar
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Arts Arts Research & Publications 2013-11-12 The Never Ending War in the Wounded Land: The New People’s Army on Samar Holden, William N. Canadian Center of Science and Education Holden, William N., "The Never Ending War in the Wounded Land: The New People’s Army on Samar." Journal of Geography and Geology (2013) vol. 5. doi:10.5539/jgg.v5n4p29 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/50191 journal article http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Attribution 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca Journal of Geography and Geology; Vol. 5, No. 4; 2013 ISSN 1916-9779 E-ISSN 1916-9787 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Never Ending War in the Wounded Land: The New People’s Army on Samar William Norman Holden1 1 University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Correspondence: William N. Holden, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. E-mail: [email protected] Received: August 9, 2013 Accepted: October 5, 2013 Online Published: November 12, 2013 doi:10.5539/jgg.v5n4p29 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jgg.v5n4p29 Abstract The island of Samar is a part of the Philippines where there has been a substantial amount of insurgent activity carried out by the New People’s Army, the armed wing of the Communist Party of the Philippines, a Maoist organization. This article examines the theoretical constructs of insurgency warfare and demonstrates how Samar’s physical geography, fragmented political geography, poverty, and landlessness have contributed to the enduring presence of the New People’s Army on that island.
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Extrajudicial Executions, Enforced Disappearances, Torture
    Philippines exchange of views (12 01 09) 1 W o r l d O r g a n i s a t i o n A g a i n s t T o r t u r e P.O. Box 21 - 1211 Geneva 8 Switzerland Tel.: 0041/22 809 49 39 / Fax: 0041/22 809 49 29 E-mail: [email protected] / Web: www.omct.org Combating extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances, torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment in the Philippines by addressing their economic, social and cultural root causes Information submitted to the European Parliament Subcommittee on Human Rights in connection with the exchange of views on the Philippines (22 January 2009) Introduction The World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) welcomes the attention the Subcommittee on Human Rights is giving to extrajudicial killings and other serious violations of human rights in the Philippines. Eliminating extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances and torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment in the Philippines will be crucial to the future social and economic development of the country and failure to do so may well negate all efforts, national and international, aimed at the development of the Philippines. The European Union is in a strong strategic position to assist the Filipino people in confronting this challenge. The European Union can work through the EU Country Strategy Paper 2007 – 2013 and it can also influence the policies and activities of European based corporations in their activities in the Philippines. This is particularly true as the root causes of these practices are to be found, for the essential, in failures to respect the economic, social and cultural rights of the Filipino people.
    [Show full text]