Crowdfunding for Nonprofits

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crowdfunding for Nonprofits Jaclyn Rundle, Ph.D. Central College Economics, Accounting & Management Dept. Pella, Iowa [email protected] 1. Traditional fundraising methods seem to be losing steam. In the past, telemarketing approaches (e.g., phone-a-thons) were an important source of small contributions Now nonprofits make more fundraising calls but bring in fewer dollars Why? ◦ Donors drop landlines ◦ Cell phone numbers are hard to access ◦ People screen calls For instance, as walk/run fundraisers like the Komen Walks proliferate, they bring new problems: ◦ Each new event increases competition for participants and donations ◦ High potential for donor overload and brand confusion ◦ Result: Lower revenues for each nonprofit Worth noting: Komen Walks in Maine, Arizona and elsewhere have been canceled due to significant attendance declines 2. The fundraising environment is shifting dramatically. 2018 Giving USA Report Statistics: ◦ Overall charitable giving has increased to record levels over the last four years; ◦ But, compared to the past, a smaller percentage of U.S. households now donates. ◦ Now, 20% of households give 80% of all donations. Generational demographics: Gen X is small compared to Boomers and Millennials, resulting in fewer Gen X households in prime giving age. Religious participation, which often motivates giving, is on the decline in the U.S. What does “support for causes” mean today? People now can contribute directly to causes by doing rather than donating. Example: Instead of donating to environmental nonprofits, environmentalists may support the earth by installing solar panels or biking to work. Another example of the shifting environment for fundraising…. Many charities expect past giving patterns to remain stable under the new tax law. But the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, predicts in its June 2018 study that 2018 donations will drop by $16 billion or 4%, as many fewer people in the U.S. itemize tax deductions. The greatest impact will be seen among middle- and upper-middle-income tax filers. Are these your donors? Nonprofits Are Experimenting With New Fundraising Approaches As Traditional Fundraising Methods “Age Out” And As the Environment Changes 1. Using data and research to boost fundraising effectiveness 2. Social giving and networking 3. Technology-based fundraising Examples: 1. Using experiments and data analysis to improve fundraising, even for small nonprofits 2. The “social donor” phenomenon, including ◦ Classic crowdfunding; ◦ New variations, such as decentralized fundraising and interactive fundraising using games & teams 3. Capitalizing on new technologies to attract donors & provide them with a means to give Studies show that only about half of all nonprofit organizations review scientific studies to find ways to improve fundraising But nonprofits that review scientific studies or conduct their own research report greater fundraising productivity than other nonprofits Bonus: More social scientists are researching charitable giving and fundraising Example: University of Chicago’s Science of Philanthropy Initiative (SPI): “Evidence- based research on charitable giving” Created in 2012 Offers annual conferences Aggregates results of academic research – but provides “Practical Takeaways” Research identifies effective and ineffective approaches to fundraising Social Information: What a donor knows about other people’s giving amounts Upward Social Information: A donor learns that others have given more than the donor Downward Social Information: A donor learns that others have given less than the donor Donors tend to increase their giving when provided with Upward Social Information But tend to decrease their giving when provided with Downward Social Information Where does Social Information come from? It can come from a neutral or public source (e.g., a newspaper article) Or it can come directly from a nonprofit, as it strategically seeks a larger donation The Two-Step Ask works to raise the level of an individual donation Step 1: Ask donor: How much would you donate for Christmas gifts for one Angel Tree child? Step 2: After listening to the Step 1 response, ask the donor: How much would you donate to buy Christmas gifts for ten Angel Tree children? The donation amount received after Step 2 is significantly larger than when only the Step 1 question is asked Why? Because people tend to be mathematically consistent in their thinking Donor’s mental calculation: My donation for ten kids should be much bigger than what I’d give for one child Science of Philanthropy Initiative web address is spihub.org SPI research articles always include “Practical Takeaways” Experimental focus: SPI encourages all nonprofits to conduct their own experiments; FAQs are on the SPI website Why conduct experiments? Surveys & focus groups tap into people’s intentions while experiments analyze what people really do. Increasingly, nonprofits conduct their own experiments and analyze their own internal data. Why? To learn about ◦ Their donors; ◦ Their donors’ patterns of giving; ◦ How often to contact donors; ◦ Specific ways to increase donations; and ◦ Which fundraising events and methods are or are not worth the time and effort The Alley Theatre is a Houston-based 501c3 Alley has annual revenues of $22 million (so, not a small nonprofit) Vision and Mission: To be a leader in the American Theatre movement through productions of its resident theatre company The fundraising staff is small – three people The question: How to bring in more money without hiring more fundraising staff? Paid a consultant to develop two predictive models, which continually analyze and “score” the theatre’s internal data First predictive model identifies donors likely to become major donors ($10,000+) Second predictive model identifies ticket buyers who are likely to become donors Result: With no extra staff, donations increased more than 3% - and provided insight into donor/ticket buyer behavior SAWF is a 501c3 founded in 1992 Based in Durham, NC Annual revenues of less than $750,000 (so, a small nonprofit) Mission: Collective action by farmworkers, college students and community to create improved conditions and justice for farmworkers SAWF created an “experiments team” made of some staffers, donors and board members The team’s job is to devise fundraising questions; conduct mini-experiments; and analyze data to find answers. Examples: ◦ Question: Will donor appreciation parties produce new funds even if no formal “ask” is made at the party? Answer: Yes. ◦ Question: Will new money come in as a result of SAWF paying to be included in a public charitable giving guide? Answer: No. 1. Emotion, not logic, motivates giving, and people yearn to make a difference – so use vivid story-telling to explain the mission and to convey the impact of the donation 2. Giving is social – so foster communities of giving, using social media and face-to-face groups 3. Premiums may deter giving – but people still love to win stuff, so consider using raffles and contests in fundraising Any nonprofit can review the social science research of SPI (or others) and adopt recommended techniques and practices Any nonprofit can analyze its own data and do its own experiments, like SAWF, Boston Ballet and Alley Theatre Reminder: Data is already available in your nonprofit’s records & databases Simple, clear questions work best (like SAWF) Ask one question at a time (i.e., keep a singular focus) Question example: How often should we communicate with different types of donors? Question example: Which fundraising events are worth the time, money and effort required to hold them? Question example: What rate of return does our nonprofit receive from the total time and effort we spend on applying for grants? Analyze nonprofit records to identify basic demographics: gender, age, race/ethnicity, income, marital status, geographic location Why do this? Some examples: ◦ Age: Is your donor base is aging out? If yes, devise strategies to recruit new, younger donors ◦ Marital status: Studies show that nonprofits often target couples for donations, losing out on the sizeable giving capacity of singles of all ages ◦ Diversity: As the U.S. population changes its composition, so should your donor base Today, donors increasingly want to give as part of a community They seek connectedness to a cause and/or a group of like-minded people This phenomenon is expressed in many new fundraising methods: ◦ Crowdfunding ◦ Interactive fundraising using teams and games ◦ Donor-directed and personal-event-based fundraising Crowdfunding is online social fundraising through networks, using a campaign There are multiple fundraisers: The nonprofit itself, individuals & teams Key element: Find potential new supporters when current individual supporters reach out to their individual social networks online 1. A project with a specific use for funds raised 2. A precise fundraising goal in dollars 3. A deadline for raising the funds (e.g., 30 days) 4. A platform (special website, e.g., Kickstarter) 5. A well-developed campaign to motivate supporters & donors 6. Supporters and donors (some already known to the nonprofit; others not yet known) 7. Continual engagement with stakeholders via social media, email, etc. – don’t ever let the campaign languish! 8. Pro tip: Before the campaign launches, have a match ready, to generate enthusiasm Average amount raised in nonprofit campaigns: $9,200.00 (down from $16,000) Average contribution: $66.00
Recommended publications
  • A Kickstarter Profile for Nonprofits
    A KICKSTARTER PROFILE FOR NONPROFITS: HOW TO ENGAGE BACKERS ONLINE BY ELIZABETH ANDERSON A Kickstarter Profile for Nonprofits: How to Engage Backers Online A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty Of Drexel University By Elizabeth J. Anderson in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Arts Administration June 2017 © Copyright 2017 Elizabeth J. Anderson. All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATIONS To my family who have always been my rock in every situation and without whom I would not have accomplished this. And to the Getty Foundation & Museum whose summer internship program got me interested in nonprofit arts administration a decade ago. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to Dr. Melissa Anderson, PhD for her assistance with the statistics software “R” and performing the factor analysis. Emily Ambash, Ayala Cnann, and Mark Anderson’s counseling and advice from their own experiences with writing a thesis or dissertation was instrumental to my process. Thank you to everyone else who provided emotional support along the way, you helped more than you probably know. I would like to acknowledge the many people who took the time to take and share the survey for my research and those who were willing to answer more detailed questions about their survey. With nearly half of survey takers volunteering, the desire to help was overwhelming and I am grateful to everyone, even those I did not have time to include in this study. A special thank you to Dr. Jean Brody whose advice helped me circumnavigate any problems I encountered. iv Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crowdfunding Platforms: Ecosystem and Evolution Full Text Available At
    Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000061 Crowdfunding Platforms: Ecosystem and Evolution Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000061 Other titles in Foundations and Trends® in Marketing Entertainment Marketing Natasha Zhang Foutz ISBN: 978-1-68083-332-4 The Cultural Meaning of Brands Carlos J. Torelli, Maria A. Rodas and Jennifer L. Stoner ISBN: 978-1-68083-286-0 Ethnography for Marketing and Consumer Research Alladi Venkatesh, David Crockett, Samantha Cross and Steven Chen ISBN: 978-1-68083-234-1 The Information-Economics Perspective on Brand Equity Tulin Erdem and Joffre Swait ISBN: 978-1-68083-168-9 Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000061 Crowdfunding Platforms: Ecosystem and Evolution Yee Heng Tan Tokyo International University Japan [email protected] Srinivas K. Reddy Singapore Management University Singapore [email protected] Boston — Delft Full text available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1700000061 Foundations and Trends® in Marketing Published, sold and distributed by: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 1024 Hanover, MA 02339 United States Tel. +1-781-985-4510 www.nowpublishers.com [email protected] Outside North America: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 179 2600 AD Delft The Netherlands Tel. +31-6-51115274 The preferred citation for this publication is Y. H. Tan and S. K. Reddy. Crowdfunding Platforms: Ecosystem and Evolution. Foundations and Trends® in Marketing, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 53–172, 2020. ISBN: 978-1-68083-699-8 © 2020 Y. H. Tan and S. K. Reddy All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • BBB Wise Giving Guide
    TM E D I U G WBBB WISI E SEGIVING ALGLIANICEV : SUI MMNGER/FALL 2013 CROWDFUNDING for Charitable Causes ® INSIDE How to Read the 10 List of National 2 Charities Q&A about the 50 CROWDFUNDING Wise Giving ® for Charitable Guide Causes National Charity 51 Seal Program A Publication of the Standards BBB Wise Giving Alliance 12 52 for Charity List of Nationally Accountability Soliciting Charities The Wise Giving Guide is published three times a year to help donors make more BBB Wise Giving Alliance Board of Directors informed giving decisions. This guide includes a compilation of David Ormstedt – Chair Paulette Maehara Attorney/Consultant • Bloomington, IN President (retired) the latest evaluation conclusions (former Assistant Attorney General in charge Association of Fundraising Professionals completed by the BBB Wise of Charities Bureau, Connecticut) Giving Alliance. Char Mollison Myrl Weinberg – Vice Chair Faculty and Program Coordinator President, National Health Council Nonprofit Management Program, If you would like to see a Washington, DC Johns Hopkins University • Washington, DC particular topic discussed Mark Shamley – Treasurer Patrick Rooney in this guide, please email President, Association of Corporate Executive Director, Center on Philanthropy at suggestions to Contributions Professionals • Orlando, FL Indiana University • Indianapolis, IN [email protected] Audrey Alvarado – Secretary Claire Rosenzweig or write to us at the Vice President, Nonprofit Roundtable of President, BBB/Metropolitan New York address below. Greater Washington • Washington, DC New York, NY Holly Cherico Jack Siegel SUMMER/FALL ISSUE 2013 Director, Marketing & Communications, Charity Governance Consulting LLC The Kingsbury Center • Washington, DC Chicago, IL BBB Wise Giving Alliance Jocile Ehrlich Cass Wheeler 3033 Wilson Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • Id/Eprint/1023
    LBS Research Online G Dushnitsky and M Fitza Are we missing the platforms for the crowd? Comparing investment drivers across multiple crowdfunding platforms Article This version is available in the LBS Research Online repository: https://lbsresearch.london.edu/ id/eprint/1023/ Dushnitsky, G and Fitza, M (2018) Are we missing the platforms for the crowd? Comparing investment drivers across multiple crowd- funding platforms. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 10 (e00100). ISSN 2352-6734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00100 Elsevier https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/... Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LBS Research Online for purposes of research and/or private study. Further distribution of the material, or use for any commercial gain, is not permitted. Are We Missing the Platforms for the Crowd? Comparing Investment Drivers Across Multiple Crowdfunding Platforms Gary Dushnitsky Markus Fitza London Business School Frankfurt School of Finance and Management Abstract Crowdfunding platforms have attracted the attention of practitioners and scholars alike. The term ‘crowdfunding’, first coined in the early 2000s, describes a new institutional form in the financial markets which utilizes digital platforms to originate and aggregate funding. There is abundant research on the topic. Yet extant work mainly consists of single-platform studies. We argue that observing patterns on one platform does not necessarily advance our understanding of other platforms. Specifically, we use data from eight major crowdfunding platforms to conduct a variance decomposition analysis of funding success. The findings suggest factors associated with success in a given platform do not replicate to the other platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Charitable Crowdfunding: Who Gives, to What, and Why?
    APRIL 2021 Charitable Crowdfunding: Who Gives, to What, and Why? RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy RESEARCHED AND WRITTEN BY — Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy The Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy is dedicated to improving philanthropy to improve the world by training and empowering students and professionals to be innovators and leaders who create positive and lasting change. The school offers a comprehensive approach to philanthropy through its academic, research and international programs, and through The Fund Raising School, Lake Institute on Faith & Giving, Mays Family Institute on Diverse Philanthropy, and Women’s Philanthropy Institute. Learn more at www.philanthropy.iupui.edu INDIANA UNIVERSITY LILLY FAMILY SCHOOL OF PHILANTHROPY PROJECT TEAM — Una O. Osili, PhD Associate Dean for Research and International Programs Jonathan Bergdoll, MA Applied Statistician Andrea Pactor, MA Project Consultant Jacqueline Ackerman, MPA Associate Director of Research, Women’s Philanthropy Institute Peter Houston, MBA Visiting Research Associate With special thanks to Dr. Wendy Chen, Dr. Debra Mesch, and Dr. Pamala Wiepking for reviewing the survey questionnaire. The survey was fielded by AmeriSpeak at NORC. The report was designed by Luke Galambos at Galambos + Associates. This research was completed with funding from Facebook. The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect official positions or policies of Facebook. INDIANA UNIVERSITY LILLY FAMILY SCHOOL OF PHILANTHROPY — 301 University Boulevard, Suite 3000, Indianapolis, IN 46202 317.278.8902 / [email protected] / @IUPhilanthropy / www.philanthropy.iupui.edu Contents Introduction ................................................... 02 Key Findings ................................................. 02 Background ................................................... 05 What is Crowdfunding? ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Philanthropy in Armenia
    1 This policy research was conducted by: "NGO CENTER" Civil Society Development NGO Address: RA, c. Vanadzor Khorenatsi str. 6/1 Phone: +374 322 43315, +374 91743315 Web Site՝ www.ngoc.am E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Research Officers: Mrs. Arpine Hakobyan Mrs. Gayane Martirosyan This document was developed as part of the Technical Assistance Support in Armenia managed by ECNL Stichting. The project is made possible by the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL) through the Civic Space Initiative. This material is also supported under the framework of the Action “Monitoring Progress, Empowering Action”, implemented with the financial support of the European Union. This publication was produced partially with the financial support of the Government of Sweden and the European Union. The Government of Sweden does not necessarily share the opinions here within expressed. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. 2 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................. 4 Banking System In The Context Of Philanthropy .... 31 CSO Fundraising Experience .................................. 33 Fundraising Tools Of Armenian CSOs ..................... 36 Institutional Foundations Of Fundraising ...............45 Conclusions ............................................................ 47 Recommendations .................................................. 51 3 Philanthropy research in Armenia Policy Research Report Introduction Currently, the non-profit sector is the largest channel of initiating and implementing philanthropic actions in Armenia, although the sector faces different kinds of challenges, and needs government support for growth and sustainability. The government should acknowledge the key role of civil society organizations in society’s democratization process and should make further legislative changes to provide good opportunities for their engagement and growth (Minasyants 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Jun Zhang (10742239) Msc
    To Which Extend Do Material Incentives Matter? A Study on Backers’ Motivation behind Crowdfunding Behaviour Master Thesis Student: Jun Zhang (10742239) MSc. in Business Administration - Entrepreneurship and Innovation Faculty of Business and Economics of UvA Supervisor: First Supervisor: Dr. G.T. Vinig Second Supervisor: Dr. W. van der Aa Date: 26 Jun 2015 (Final Version) Statement of Originality This document is written by Student Jun Zhang, who declares to take full responsibility for the contents of this document. I declare that the text and the work presented in this document is original and that no sources other than those mentioned in the text and its references have been used in creating it. The Faculty of Economics and Business is responsible solely for the supervision of completion of the work, not for the contents. Page 2 of 91 Contents Acknowledgement ..................................................................................................................... 5 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Academic Relevance ................................................................................................. 10 1.2 Managerial Relevance ............................................................................................... 11 1.3 Thesis Outline ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Financing of Creative Projects on the Kickstarter Platform: Ukrainian and Polish Experience
    E3S Web of Conferences 166, 13019 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016613019 ICSF 2020 Innovative financing of creative projects on the Kickstarter platform: Ukrainian and Polish experience Iuliia Gernego1,*, Liudmyla Petrenko2, Mykhailo Dyba1, and Vitalii Tsarov2 1Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Corporate Finance and Controlling Department, 54/1 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine 2Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Business Economics and Entrepreneurship Department, 54/1 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine Abstract. In the era of digital economy, the crowdfunding platforms provide the background to mitigate cross-country differences within project financing. In particular, creative projects are important as a vital driver in maintaining business and social sector competitive. Thereby, research problem lays upon the potential of providing crowdfunding support to overcome the creative project divide in different countries. The paper aims to provide scientific support on creative projects innovative financing in Ukraine and Poland within Kickstarter. The research methodology is based on Kickstarter data (10 years; 83 industries and 898 projects) processed by statistical analysis. The Concentration Ratio (CR) was modified to measure the concentration of efforts, considering the largest creative industries within Kickstarter platform. The results section represents high rates of concentration of efforts for Ukrainian creative projects that commercialize tangible physical goods: Product Design and Gadgets. At the same time, in Poland the main concentration of efforts is in the field of intangible intellectual products: Tabletop Games and Video Games. Thus, digital platform is a reflection of interrelations between intangible and tangible values in economies. The study results can be used within national programs of creative innovative projects financial support.
    [Show full text]
  • Dare to Venture: Data Science Perspective on Crowdfunding Ruhaab Markas Southern Methodist University, [email protected]
    SMU Data Science Review Volume 2 | Number 1 Article 19 2019 Dare to Venture: Data Science Perspective on Crowdfunding Ruhaab Markas Southern Methodist University, [email protected] Yisha Wang Southern Methodist University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/datasciencereview Part of the Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations Commons Recommended Citation Markas, Ruhaab and Wang, Yisha (2019) "Dare to Venture: Data Science Perspective on Crowdfunding," SMU Data Science Review: Vol. 2 : No. 1 , Article 19. Available at: https://scholar.smu.edu/datasciencereview/vol2/iss1/19 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in SMU Data Science Review by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. Markas and Wang: Data Science Perspective on Crowdfunding Dare to Venture: Data Science Perspective on Crowdfunding Ruhaab Markas1, Yisha Wang1, John Tseng2 1Master of Science in Data Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75275 USA 2Independant Consultant Dallas, TX 75275 USA {Rmarkas, YishaW}@smu.edu, [email protected] Abstract. Crowdfunding is an emerging segment of the financial sectors. Entrepreneurs are now able to seek funds from the online community through the use of online crowdfunding platforms. Entrepreneurs seek to understand attributes that play into a successful crowdfunding project (commonly known as campaign). In this paper we seek so understand the field of crowdfunding and various factors that contribute to the success of a campaign. We aim to use traditional modeling techniques to predict successful campaigns for Kickstarter.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Crowdfunding Nation Documenting the Global Rise of Efinance & the Efunding Escalator
    Mapping - The State of The Crowdfunding Nation Documenting The Global Rise of eFinance & the eFunding Escalator HEADLINE EDITION QUARTER TWO 2014 THE FULL REPORT IS AVAILABLE NOW AT thecrowdfundingcentre.com/report Mapping - The State of The Crowdfunding Nation | 2 Mapping - The State of The Crowdfunding Nation Documenting The Global Rise of eFinance & the eFunding Escalator HEADLINE EDITION QUARTER TWO 2014 THE FULL REPORT IS AVAILABLE NOW AT thecrowdfundingcentre.com/report From TheCrowdfundingCentre.com W: TheCrowdDataCenter.com E: [email protected] 'For the first time we can see how Crowdfunding is spreading and the map makes it real and shows how present and pervasive it already is. This is a great achievement and a breakthrough for us all showing how differently countries, states and cities are doing relative to each other and their neighbours.' Sherwood (Woodie) Neiss partner, Crowdfund Capital Advisors & one of the architects of the USA’s JOBS act Jason Best welcomed the report saying "Data is critical in driving the development of any industry and none more than crowdfunding. The ability to document money invested, jobs created, sales growth, new company starts, etc are all vital to demonstrate to regulators and investors that this market is the modern finance market and one that should be embraced." Jason Best, Co-Founder at Crowdfund Capital Advisors & Co-Architect or the JOBS ACT "This report is a crucial development for our field. With such a fast moving market, growing exponentially, it is extremely important that policy makers, educators and professionals have a resource to track funding patterns. The Crowdfunding Centre has laid the foundation for a data set that can change the industry." Dr Richard Swart, Global Crowdfunding & Alternative Finance Researcher, University of California, Berkeley and about The Crowdfunding Centre: @CrowdfundCentre just found out about you.
    [Show full text]
  • Crowd Funding Summary
    Crowd Funding Crowd Funding | Definition : According to the Oxford Dictionary, crowd funding is defined as “the process of funding a project or venture by raising monetary contributions from a large number of people typically via the internet.” Crowd Funding | Background: The first instance of crowd funding occurred in 1997 when a British rock band funded its reunion tour through online donations from fans. Due to this band’s success, a website called ArtistShare became the first crowd funding website. Since crowd funding’s inception, crowd funding has grown at a 74% compounded annual growth rate and as of 2013, receives about 2 billion dollars of funding annually. In the United States, President Barrack Obama signed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act into law and in the US, this has legalized and equity crowd funding. In practice, new ventures typically offer different perks and products from the company in return for donations. These perks and products could be merchandize, equity, publicity, and other types of rewards and recognition. Crowd funding is one of the most powerful ways for entrepreneurs to earn funding for their ventures by having access to investors without extreme dilution of their company ownership. (Information retrieved from fundable.com) Crowd Funding | Controversy : Since crowd funding’s genesis, the programs, businesses, and ventures that have sought funding have begun to morph. More recently, people and organizations have sought to fund ventures such as supporting a private invasion to take Fallujah, Iraq back from Isis—and also another venture to support the police officer who shot Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PEER-TO-PEER FUNDRAISING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE an Overview of Leading Peer-To-Peer Fundraising Software Platforms and Their Functionality 2018 EDITION
    INCLUDES THE GUEST ARTICLE “Fundraging with Friends” BY AMY SAMPLE WARD CEO, NTEN THE PEER-TO-PEER FUNDRAISING TECHNOLOGY LANDSCAPE An Overview of Leading Peer-to-Peer Fundraising Software Platforms and Their Functionality 2018 EDITION © 2018 Cathexis Partners Version 1.1 ABOUT THIS GUIDE This guide was created for nonprofits as an introduction to some of the leading software platforms available today for peer-to-peer online fundraising. It provides an overview of 39 products and their functionality in six areas: • Design capabilities • Engagement capabilities • User interface • Administrative interface • Integration capabilities • Pricing Important Notes This guide covers many of the leading platforms available for peer-to-peer fundraising as of the guide’s writing. The world of peer-to-peer fundraising technology is continually changing; vendors are continually updating and enhancing their platforms and introducing new features. This guide offers an introduction to each platform, and does not attempt to include every detail about every feature included in each platform. Cathexis Partners strongly recommends that organizations review their specific requirements to support their campaign(s), mission, and audience; request software demos; and closely review any contracts with software platform vendors before making a software purchase. Cathexis Partners has not received compensation for including any product or information in this guide. Please note: The example campaigns provided in this guide may be seasonal, and links may not work in the future. © 2018 Cathexis Partners The Peer-to-Peer Fundraising Technology Landscape 2 SOFTWARE PLATFORMS INCLUDED • Arreva • GivingGrid • CauseVox • Giving Spirit • Charidy • GlobalGiving • CharityEngine by BIS Global • iRaiser • CharityWeb • Kindful • Classy • Mightycause (previously Razoo) • Click & Pledge • NeonCRM by Z2 Systems, Inc.
    [Show full text]