DOCSLIB.ORG

(Icts) in Information and Communication in Science

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Icts) in Information and Communication in Science ABSTRACT Title of Document: THE ROLE OF NEW INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICTS) IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION IN SCIENCE. A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND EMPIRICAL STUDY Christina K. Pikas, Ph.D., 2016 Directed By: Professor Emeritus Dagobert Soergel, College of Information Studies Problem This dissertation presents a literature-based framework for communication in science (with the elements partners, purposes, message, and channel), which it then applies in and amends through an empirical study of how geoscientists use two social computing technologies (SCTs), blogging and Twitter (both general use and tweeting from conferences). How are these technologies used and what value do scientists derive from them? Method The empirical part used a two-pronged qualitative study, using (1) purposive samples of ~400 blog posts and ~1000 tweets and (2) a purposive sample of 8 geoscientist interviews. Blog posts, tweets, and interviews were coded using the framework, adding new codes as needed. The results were aggregated into 8 geoscientist case studies, and general patterns were derived through cross-case analysis. Results A detailed picture of how geoscientists use blogs and twitter emerged, including a number of new functions not served by traditional channels. Some highlights: Geoscientists use SCTs for communication among themselves as well as with the public. Blogs serve persuasion and personal knowledge management; Twitter often amplifies the signal of traditional communications such as journal articles. Blogs include tutorials for peers, reviews of basic science concepts, and book reviews. Twitter includes links to readings, requests for assistance, and discussions of politics and religion. Twitter at conferences provides live coverage of sessions. Conclusions Both blogs and Twitter are routine parts of scientists' communication toolbox, blogs for in-depth, well-prepared essays, Twitter for faster and broader interactions. Both have important roles in supporting community building, mentoring, and learning and teaching. The Framework of Communication in Science was a useful tool in studying these two SCTs in this domain. The results should encourage science administrators to facilitate SCT use of scientists in their organization and information providers to search SCT documents as an important source of information. THE ROLE OF NEW INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICTS) IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION IN SCIENCE. A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND EMPIRICAL STUDY By Christina Kirk Pikas Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2016 Advisory Committee: Professor Dagobert Soergel, Chair Professor Jennifer Preece Associate Professor Linda Aldoory Assistant Professor Jessica Vitak Dr. Kenneth Fleischmann © 2016 Christina K. Pikas This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor, Dagobert Soergel, for encouraging me to embark upon this crazy long road and sticking by me over the last decade. His advice and support has kept me going. I also thank my dissertation committee members, Jennifer Preece, Linda Aldoory, Jessica Vitak, and Kenneth Fleischmann, for their advice, questions, and encouragement. My employer, the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, has been tremendously supportive of my PhD work – all eleven years of it! Paying tuition and fees in advance, providing educational leave, providing access to the literature, and flexible policies that have allowed me to work on this project. All of the scientists and engineers who have gently nudged me along, too! My co-workers, too, have been hugely supportive, taking on some of my load so I can get this done (Thank you Carol Brueggemeier and Ashley Arnold in particular). The bosses I have had, Susan Fingerman, Bob Gresehover, Judith Theodori, and Kristine Harshaw did not bat an eye at the idea that I might pursue a PhD and accommodated a flexible schedule so I could carve out time for writing. The Geoscientists who have participated in my study and responded to questions afterward have been truly wonderful. It’s been such a pleasure reading your tweets and blogs. A big thank you to the Library Society of the World for support, encouragement, and questions answered. Finally, thanks go to my sister Maggie Osborne who never had any doubt I could do this and offered to baby sit to give me time to get it done; to my parents, Gail and Howard Kirk who have always encouraged me; and to my mother in law for watching my babies so I could get more work done! iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. ii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... x 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Research Questions ..................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Importance and Contributions ..................................................................................... 6 1.3.1 A Comprehensive Framework for Describing and Analyzing Communication in Science 6 1.3.2 Findings Will be Useful for Various Actors who Aim to Improve Science Communication ................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Organization of the dissertation .................................................................................. 9 2. Literature Review and Framework .......................................................................... 10 2.0 Framework of Communication in Science. Overview .............................................. 10 2.0.1 Outline of the Framework of Communication in Science as used in coding ..... 11 2.0.2 Introduction to the Framework of Communication in Science .......................... 14 2.1 Features of the Communication Partners .................................................................. 15 2.1.1 Audience Size or Number of Communication Partners ..................................... 16 2.1.2 Individual Features of the Communication Partners ......................................... 17 2.1.3 Match of and Relationship among or between Communication Partners .......... 20 2.2 Purpose of the communication activity ..................................................................... 22 2.2.1 Dissemination .................................................................................................... 23 2.2.2 Preservation........................................................................................................ 24 2.2.3 Validation or Certification of Content ............................................................... 24 2.2.4 Discourse or Contributing to the Conversation ................................................. 26 2.2.5 Societal Benefit or Applications ........................................................................ 26 2.2.6 Identity ............................................................................................................... 27 2.2.7 Rewards.............................................................................................................. 27 iv 2.2.8 Learning, teaching, or assessment ..................................................................... 27 2.2.9 Persuasion .......................................................................................................... 28 2.2.10 Evaluation or Opinion ........................................................................................ 28 2.2.11 Coordination ...................................................................................................... 29 2.2.12 Social.................................................................................................................. 29 2.2.13 Entertainment ..................................................................................................... 31 2.3 Features of the message or content ............................................................................ 31 2.3.1 Topic .................................................................................................................. 32 2.3.2 Type of content .................................................................................................. 32 2.3.3 Register .............................................................................................................. 36 2.3.4 Language ............................................................................................................ 37 2.3.5 Structure ............................................................................................................. 37 2.3.6 Persistence.........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality, and Direction of (Public) Research Output
    Methodology Data & Measurement Results Summary The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality, and Direction of (Public) Research Output Pierre Azoulay1 Waverly Ding2 Toby Stuart3 1Sloan School of Management MIT & NBER [email protected] 2Haas School of Business University of California — Berkeley 3Graduate School of Business Harvard University January 23, 2007 — Northwestern University Azoulay, Ding, Stuart The Impact of Academic Patenting Methodology Data & Measurement Results Summary Outline 1 Motivation(s) 2 Methodology Problems with existing approaches Selection on observables with staggered treatment decisions Implementing IPTCW estimation 3 Data & Measurement Data sources Measuring “patentability” Descriptive statistics 4 Results The determinants of selection into patenting The impact of academic patenting on the rate of publications The impact of academic patenting on the quality of publications The impact of academic patenting on the content of publications 5 Caveats, Summary & Future Directions Azoulay, Ding, Stuart The Impact of Academic Patenting Methodology Data & Measurement Results Summary Outline 1 Motivation(s) 2 Methodology Problems with existing approaches Selection on observables with staggered treatment decisions Implementing IPTCW estimation 3 Data & Measurement Data sources Measuring “patentability” Descriptive statistics 4 Results The determinants of selection into patenting The impact of academic patenting on the rate of publications The impact of academic patenting on the quality of publications The impact
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Comments on Proposed Amendments to Patent
    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY - ISRAEL AUTHOR Request for comments on proposed David Gilat amendments to Patent Law 26 April 2021 | Contributed by Reinhold Cohn Group Easing of regulatory burden Examination of biological molecules Patentable subject matter Biological material samples Destruction of infringing products Reliance on foreign patent office decisions Other issues Outstanding issues The Ministry of Justice and the Patent Office recently published a request for comments on purported expansive amendments to the Patent Law. Some of the proposed amendments are minor, while others represent radical changes to the existing legislation. Many of the proposed amendments, if carried through, may benefit foreign applicants, which are the source of most patent applications in Israel. The deadline for filing comments was 7 April 2021. It remains to be seen how the process will develop. This article discusses the proposed amendments and the effect that they may have on the Israeli patent system. Easing of regulatory burden The proposed amendments follow a 2014 government resolution which provides that all government offices should reduce their regulatory burden. Accordingly, many of the proposed amendments clearly relate to reducing the regulatory burden which results from filing patent applications. For example, the request for comments asked applicants about the removal of the Patent Office requirement that parties must disclose any publications cited by any patent offices in other countries. The request for comments also asked applicants about the introduction of a grace period, which would give parties one year following the first publication of their invention to file a patent application. Without a grace period, an inventor's patent rights can be undermined where, for example, they discuss their new research at a conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Library Values to Emerging Technology Decision-Making in the Age of Open Access, Maker Spaces, and the Ever-Changing Library
    ACRL Publications in Librarianship No. 72 Applying Library Values to Emerging Technology Decision-Making in the Age of Open Access, Maker Spaces, and the Ever-Changing Library Editors Peter D. Fernandez and Kelly Tilton Association of College and Research Libraries A division of the American Library Association Chicago, Illinois 2018 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of Ameri- can National Standard for Information Sciences–Permanence of Paper for Print- ed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992. ∞ Cataloging-in-Publication data is on file with the Library of Congress. Copyright ©2018 by the Association of College and Research Libraries. All rights reserved except those which may be granted by Sections 107 and 108 of the Copyright Revision Act of 1976. Printed in the United States of America. 22 21 20 19 18 5 4 3 2 1 Contents Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................ix Peter Fernandez, Head, LRE Liaison Programs, University of Tennessee Libraries Kelly Tilton, Information Literacy Instruction Librarian, University of Tennessee Libraries Part I Contemplating Library Values Chapter 1. ..........................................................................................................1 The New Technocracy: Positioning Librarianship’s Core Values in Relationship to Technology Is a Much Taller Order Than We Think John Buschman, Dean of University Libraries, Seton Hall University Chapter 2. ........................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Powerhouse in Health Health Science Alliance Ltd Research – a Science and Innovation Audit
    The Northern Submitted by the Northern Powerhouse in Health Health Science Alliance Ltd Research – A Science and Innovation Audit Appendices June 2018 Key Local authorities in overlapping LEPs Northern Powerhouse LEPs The Northern Submitted by the Northern Powerhouse in Health Health Science Alliance Ltd Research – A Science and Innovation Audit Appendices June 2018 Prepared by: Prepared for: SDG Economic Development Submitted by the Northern Health 61 Mosley Street Science Alliance Ltd Manchester M2 3HZ C/O Weightmans LLP, Hardman Square No 1 Spinningfields, Manchester, M3 3EB +44 161 261 9154 www.sdgED.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for Submitted by the Northern Health Science Alliance Ltd. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer Davies Gleave has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. The Northern Powerhouse in Health Research – A Science and Innovation Audit | Appendices Contents 1 Bibliography ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 Policy Context .................................................................................................................... 3 3 Chapter Two Appendix - Strengths in Science and Innovation ............................................ 17 4 Chapter Three Appendix - Theme 1: Data for Better Health and Wealth ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Blogs: What Are They??
    BLOGS: WHAT ARE THEY?? Blogs are a contemporary form of journalism. To answer the title question, we may build our reply using several of the questions journalists are trained to address. When did blogs appear on the scene? The term blog has its earliest direct roots in on-line diaries which appeared in 1994 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_blogging). It was not until 1997 that the term “weblog” was coined to describe this form of communication; by 1999, it finally morphed into simply blog. In 2004, Meriam-Webster cataloged the word blog as a legitimate dictionary denizen. Ian Ring is credited with being the inventor (or parent) of the blog in 1997. As noted above, in its earliest years the blog appeared primarily as an on line diary or serial of the life and times of its author(s). Today’s blogs are adolescents in linguistic terms and they have outgrown all of their early childhood clothing to take on a host of very different appearances. An early Ted Talk includes commentary on the young years of blogging. Mena Trott in 2006 recounts some of her early experiences with blogging she began in 2001 ( https:// www.ted.com/talks/mena_trott_tours_her_blog_world ). Now, some 10 years after this Ted Talk, blogs have undergone explosive growth in both content and numbers, achieving a stature only dimly envisioned by their parents. We now encounter blog as just one of a whole host of terms building upon it including blogger, blogging, liveblogging, photoblog, microblog, moblog and a host of others. What purposes can blogs serve? Want to inform, teach, convince, amuse, sway, share, sell, defend, support or refute something? • Long and short of it – blogs are contemporary forms of journalism in the broadest sense of the art.
    [Show full text]
  • CUE Live User Guide 3.2.1-2 Table of Contents
    CUE Live User Guide 3.2.1-2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Using CUE Live................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Creating an Event...................................................................................................................6 2.2 Blogging with CUE Live......................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Adding Images...........................................................................................................7 2.2.2 Adding Social Content...............................................................................................7 2.2.3 Pinning Entries.......................................................................................................... 8 2.2.4 Tagging Entries......................................................................................................... 8 2.2.5 Editing Entries........................................................................................................... 9 2.2.6 Posting to Twitter...................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Including External Content..................................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 Social Media Feeds...................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • The Captivate Collection
    THE CAPTIVATE COLLECTION Perspectives on the business and craft of audience engagement • medium.com/captivate-us THE CAPTIVATE COLLECTION 8 Introduction: The Captivate Collection RANDY BENNETT, DIRECTOR, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND PARTNERSHIPS UF COLLEGE OF JOURNALISM AND COMMUNICATIONS ENGAGEMENT THE CAPTIVATE COLLECTION 10 What’s the Key to Media Success? Products that Build Relationships DAVID COHN, EXECUTIVE PRODUCER, AJ+ 13 What Buzzfeed, Medium and Adafruit Know About Engagement RYAN SINGEL, CO-FOUNDER, CONTEXLY 17 Be Social, Leverage Technology, Build Stuff TOM KELLEHER, CHAIR/DEPARTMENT OF ADVERTISING, UF COLLEGE OF JOURNALISM AND COMMUNICATIONS 21 Monetize Passion, Not Pageviews: A Q&A with Jim Brady JIM BRADY, CEO, STOMPING GROUND 24 What Customers Want is Invisible to the Eye KAILA COLBIN, CO-FOUNDER, MINISTRY OF AWESOME STORYTELLING THE CAPTIVATE COLLECTION 29 From Story Told to Story Lived DARREN “DAZ” MCCOLL, GLOBAL CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER, SAPIENTNITRO 32 An Actor’s Guide to Better Storytelling ROB BIESENBACH, CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANT AND WRITER 36 Creating a Richer Storytelling Experience MARK POTTS, FOUNDER, NEWSPEG.COM MARKETING THE CAPTIVATE COLLECTION 41 The Dawn of a New Era in Marketing RISHAD TOBACCOWALA, CHIEF STRATEGIST AND MEMBER OF THE DIRECTOIRE+, PUBLICIS GROUP 44 “Emotional fulfillment, not technology, will be the stand-out offering of a winning brand” KEVIN ROBERTS, CEO WORLDWIDE, SAATCHI & SAATCHI 48 Don’t Call It Advertising Anymore DOUG WEAVER, FOUNDER AND CEO, UPSTREAM GROUP 51 We Need a New “Church
    [Show full text]
  • Communities of Blogging: Extensions of Our Identities Ellen Taricani
    American Communication Journal Vol. 9, No. 3, Fall 2007 Communities of Blogging: Extensions of Our Identities Ellen Taricani Keywords: blogging, identity, social networking Writing through a blog is a way of extending ourselves in a virtual world. Our identity is formed and molded as we unveil our thoughts and have others offer comments and feedback. The online environment has a direct impact in creating active social interactions to assist in defining our identity. Most blogs are a personal journal type of entry that deals with the personal experiences and reflections. Our concept of ourself is derived from a perceived membership in a particular blog through the deeper connectivity of the dialog. Most bloggers are under 30 and influenced by the postmodern philosophies. Some of these are discussed and parallels are made to bring more understanding of this fascination with the public broadcast of thoughts and feelings. ________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Ellen Taricani is a Lecturer in the Dept. of Communication Arts and Sciences at Penn State University. Correspondence to: Dept. of Communication Arts and Sciences, Penn State University 227 Sparks Building, University Park, PA 16802. Email: [email protected] Paper presented at the American Communication Conference annual meeting, Taos, New Mexico, Oct. 3-7, 2007 Blogging is a popular social and cultural collection of thought and communication. It consists of a presence that is an expression of who we are, our identity. Culture attempts to adopt this technology across dimensions of life, such as personal and professional life. Dertouzos (1997) described it as a world of human-centric computing that will insinuate the lives of individuals in societies that have learned to accept technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Research Metrics INTRODUCTION Discover How to Monitor Your Journal’S Performance Through a Range of Research Metrics
    Understanding research metrics INTRODUCTION Discover how to monitor your journal’s performance through a range of research metrics. This page will take you through the “basket of metrics”, from Impact Factor to usage, and help you identify the right research metrics for your journal. Contents UNDERSTANDING RESEACH METRICS 2 What are research metrics? What are research metrics? Research metrics are the fundamental tools used across the publishing industry to measure performance, both at journal- and author-level. For a long time, the only tool for assessing journal performance was the Impact Factor – more on that in a moment. Now there are a range of different research metrics available. This “basket of metrics” is growing every day, from the traditional Impact Factor to Altmetrics, h-index, and beyond. But what do they all mean? How is each metric calculated? Which research metrics are the most relevant to your journal? And how can you use these tools to monitor your journal’s performance? For a quick overview, download our simple guide to research metrics. Or keep reading for a more in-depth look at what’s in the “basket of metrics” and how to interpret it. UNDERSTANDING RESEACH METRICS 3 Citation-based metrics Citation-based metrics IMPACT FACTOR What is the Impact Factor? The Impact Factor is probably the most well-known metric for assessing journal performance. Designed to help librarians with collection management in the 1960s, it has since become a common proxy for journal quality. The Impact Factor is a simple research metric: it’s the average number of citations received by articles in a journal within a two-year window.
    [Show full text]
  • 20Entrepreneurial Journalism
    Journalism: New Challenges Karen Fowler-Watt and Stuart Allan (eds) Journalism: New Challenges Edited by: Karen Fowler-Watt and Stuart Allan Published by: Centre for Journalism & Communication Research Bournemouth University BIC Subject Classification Codes: GTC Communication Studies JFD Media Studies KNTD Radio and television industry KNTJ Press and journalism JNM Higher and further education, tertiary education First published 2013, this version 1.02 ISBN: 978-1-910042-01-4 [paperback] ISBN: 978-1-910042-00-7 [ebook-PDF] ISBN: 978-1-910042-02-1 [ebook-epub] http://microsites.bournemouth.ac.uk/cjcr/ Copyright © 2013 Acknowledgements Our first thank you is to the contributors who made Journalism: New Challenges possible, not least for so generously sharing their expertise, insights and enthusiasm for this approach to academic e-publishing. This endeavour was supported by the Centre for Journalism and Communication Research (CJCR), here in the Media School at Bournemouth University, UK. With regard to the production and distribution of this book, we are grateful to Einar Thorsen and Ann Luce for their stellar efforts. They would like to thank, in turn, Carrie Ka Mok for setting its design and layout, and Ana Alania for contributing ideas for the cover. Many thanks as well to Mary Evans, Emma Scattergood and Chindu Sreedharan for their helpful sugges- tions on how to develop this publishing venture. Karen Fowler-Watt and Stuart Allan, editors Table of contents Introduction i Karen Fowler-Watt and Stuart Allan Section One: New Directions
    [Show full text]
  • The Patent System and Research Freedom: a Comparative
    SCP/15/3 ANNEX V I 6. “The Patent System and Research Freedom: A Comparative Study” Prepared by: Richard Gold & Yann Joly Prepared for: The World Intellectual Property Organization Submitted: August 2, 2010 SCP/15/3 Annex VI, page i Contents I. Scope and Definitions ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 1 A. Scope and Issues ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 1 B. Definitions ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 2 II. Exclusions Affecting Research ................................ ................................ ........................ 3 A. International Legal Framework ................................ ................................ .................... 3 i) Global Lega l Framework ................................ ................................ ......................... 3 ii) Europe ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 4 iii) North America ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 10 iv) South Ameri ca ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 11 B. Exclusions Affecting Research ................................ ................................ .................. 13 i) Table comparing exclusions affecting research (national
    [Show full text]
  • Proteomics Research in India
    AUGUST 2015 | NATURE INDIA SPECIAL ISSUE SPECIAL INDIA NATURE | 2015 AUGUST Special Issue PROTEOMICS RESEARCH IN INDIA August 2015 PROTEOMICS RESEARCH IN INDIA IN RESEARCH PROTEOMICS 3A, 5th Floor, DLF Corporate Park, Phase III, Gurgaon- 122002, Haryana, India Produced with support from Email: [email protected] facebook.com/npgindia @NatureInd Special Issue PROTEOMICS RESEARCH IN INDIA August 2015 India making a mark in global Special Issue proteomics research PROTEOMICS RESEARCH IN INDIA August 2015 When Nature published a cover article last year on the human proteome – more than a decade after publication of the draft human genome sequence – it was a moment of joy and pride for proteomics scientists in India. The country had missed the genomics bus earlier but a Bangalore-based group more In association with than made up for the missed opportunity by identifying 17, 294 protein-coding genes and providing evidence of tissue- and cell- restricted proteins through expression Cover Pictures: © Ivary Inc./Alamy profiling1. Illustration: Ajay Kumar Bhatt The same issue of Nature carried another important paper which gave assembled Subhra Priyadarshini protein evidence for 18,097 genes in ProteomicsDB and highlighted the utility of th According to Pierre Legrain, past President 3A, 5 Floor, DLF Corporate Park, M G Road Phase-3 2 Gurgaon 122002, Haryana, India the data . of the Human Proteome Organisation Ph: +91 124 3079600/+91-124-3079657 Proteomics has witnessed a boom globally (HUPO), the Indian proteomics EDITORIAL in the last decade,
    [Show full text]