DOCSLIB.ORG

T013- Wed 22 Apr 2009 / Mer 22 Avr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

T-13 T-13 ISSN 1180-4319 Legislative Assembly Assemblée législative of Ontario de l’Ontario First Session, 39th Parliament Première session, 39e législature Official Report Journal of Debates des débats (Hansard) (Hansard) Wednesday 22 April 2009 Mercredi 22 avril 2009 Standing Committee on Comité permanent des Regulations and Private Bills règlements et des projets de loi d’intérêt privé Chair: Michael Prue Président : Michael Prue Clerk: Sylwia Przezdziecki Greffière : Sylwia Przezdziecki Hansard on the Internet Le Journal des débats sur Internet Hansard and other documents of the Legislative Assembly L’adresse pour faire paraître sur votre ordinateur personnel can be on your personal computer within hours after each le Journal et d’autres documents de l’Assemblée législative sitting. The address is: en quelques heures seulement après la séance est : http://www.ontla.on.ca/ Index inquiries Renseignements sur l’index Reference to a cumulative index of previous issues may be Adressez vos questions portant sur des numéros précédents obtained by calling the Hansard Reporting Service indexing du Journal des débats au personnel de l’index, qui vous staff at 416-325-7410 or 325-3708. fourniront des références aux pages dans l’index cumulatif, en composant le 416-325-7410 ou le 325-3708. Hansard Reporting and Interpretation Services Service du Journal des débats et d’interprétation Room 500, West Wing, Legislative Building Salle 500, aile ouest, Édifice du Parlement 111 Wellesley Street West, Queen’s Park 111, rue Wellesley ouest, Queen’s Park Toronto ON M7A 1A2 Toronto ON M7A 1A2 Telephone 416-325-7400; fax 416-325-7430 Téléphone, 416-325-7400; télécopieur, 416-325-7430 Published by the Legislative Assembly of Ontario Publié par l’Assemblée législative de l’Ontario T-71 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO ASSEMBLÉE LÉGISLATIVE DE L’ONTARIO STANDING COMMITTEE COMITÉ PERMANENT DES ON REGULATIONS RÈGLEMENTS ET DES PROJETS DE LOI AND PRIVATE BILLS D’INTÉRÊT PRIVÉ Wednesday 22 April 2009 Mercredi 22 avril 2009 The committee met at 0903 in room 151. itself. I don’t have much else to say, other than I’ll be supporting the bill. The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Any questions from 1173931 ONTARIO LIMITED ACT, 2009 committee members? Consideration of Bill Pr21, An Act to revive 1173931 Mr. Paul Miller: When they left Canada and went Ontario Limited. back to Switzerland, were they aware of the rules? Did The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): I call the meeting to they just mess up on the rules, on the forms? It seems like order. this is an afterthought. The first bill before us is Bill Pr21, An Act to revive Mr. Peter Robertson: They were doing their own 1173931 Ontario Limited. The sponsor is Mr. Johnson. legal work at the time. One of the directors took it upon Mr. Johnson, would you take the seat and introduce the himself to file a Form 1, Notice of Change. applicant? Mr. Paul Miller: Without legal advice? Mr. Rick Johnson: On behalf of MPP Rinaldi, I Mr. Peter Robertson: Without legal advice. My in- would like to introduce Peter Robertson, the legal coun- volvement started when I got an urgent e-mail from sel who is going to speak to this bill. Switzerland asking me to do something about it immedi- The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Mr. Robertson, the ately. floor is yours. Mr. Paul Miller: And you’re a lawyer? Mr. Peter Robertson: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Peter Robertson: I’m a lawyer, yes. I’ve been a This proposed legislation to revive 1173931 Ontario lawyer for 31 years. Limited arises, as is set out in the compendium, as a re- Mr. Paul Miller: So someone took it upon them- sult of the directors of the corporation all having become selves, felt that they had a legal background and they did non-residents of Canada. Essentially, 1173931 Ontario it, and it didn’t work out, basically. Limited is, or was, a company that owns a number of Mr. Peter Robertson: That’s about right, yes. apartment buildings in the Quinte area. The directors are Mr. Paul Miller: Okay. Thank you. all family members. They’re from Switzerland. The elder The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Any other ques- generation of that family required care, and they all tions? No other questions. Are the members ready to moved back to Switzerland to look after the father and vote? Okay. mother. When they did that, they filed a Form 1, Notice Shall section 1 carry? Carried. of Change, advising the government of the change of ad- Shall section 2 carry? Carried. dress, and the director cancelled the corporation. Shall section 3, the short title, carry? Carried. I have agreed to be the resident Canadian director, and Shall the preamble carry? Carried. I have been so appointed. Until they can come back from Shall the title carry? Carried. Switzerland, I will be the resident Canadian director of Shall the bill carry? Carried. this corporation. Shall I report the bill to the House? Carried. We have to get the corporation re-established in order Thank you very much. That’s democracy, and pretty to file the tax returns and resume carrying on business in fast. Canada. Mr. Peter Robertson: It’s interesting to see. I think that’s basically my submission. Mr. Paul Miller: Was it worth the trip? The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Okay. Any com- Mr. Bill Murdoch: He’s a lawyer. He’s been doing ments from the sponsor? None? Any interested parties? this— Are there any interested parties to this? Seeing none, Mr. Peter Robertson: Actually, I have to say yes, it Parliamentary Assistant, any comments? was. Mr. Mario Sergio: Mr. Chairman, the ministry that Mr. Paul Miller: From a financial perspective? might have had an interest in this bill has shown no con- Interjection: We’ll stop there. cern whatsoever. I don’t have any problem with the bill Interjections. T-72 STANDING COMMITTEE ON REGULATIONS AND PRIVATE BILLS 22 APRIL 2009 WELECHENKO TRANSPORT LTD. Mr. Gerry Martiniuk: Thank you. Which one? ACT, 2009 The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): If this was serious, Consideration of Bill Pr23, An Act to revive Wele- then—but all right. Mr. Miller? chenko Transport Ltd. Mr. Paul Miller: I would like to thank the sponsor for The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Order, please. We his wonderful input, and I guess it’s just kind of a one- have a second item on the agenda, which is Bill Pr23, An liner; it’s just a housecleaning thing: Vote for it. Well, Act to revive Welechenko Transport Ltd. The sponsor is thanks, Bill. That was quite insightful of you, and I ap- Mr. Murdoch. So, Mr. Murdoch, if you would change preciate it, but I think it’s just basically a no-brainer. seats there and introduce the applicant. Mr. Mario Sergio: He put a lot of work into it. Mr. Bill Murdoch: This is a good bill. It won’t take Mr. Paul Miller: He put a lot of work into it, yes. long. I wouldn’t bring a bad bill to this committee, be- The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Any other questions cause I know that if we ever got bogged down, we’d be from members? Seeing none, are the members ready to in trouble. vote? Okay. Mr. Danyluk is here to represent the applicant. Do you Shall section 1 carry? Carried. have a few words you want to tell them? But don’t say Shall section 2 carry? Carried. too much because they can only absorb so much. Shall section 3, the short title, carry? Carried. Mr. Paul Miller: You can say that because you’re a Shall the preamble carry? Carried. separate party. Shall the title carry? Carried. Mr. Bill Murdoch: I know. Shall the bill carry? Carried. Mr. William Danyluk: I’m just here to represent him Shall I report the bill to the House? Carried. because he’s on the road. He can’t make it, and he asked Thank you very much. me to come and speak. He wants to change the property Mr. Bill Murdoch: Thank you very much. I appre- that he’s applying for here to his name from the corpor- ciate it. ation. Mr. William Danyluk: Thank you very much. The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): How are you related to the applicant? The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): Before we formally Mr. William Danyluk: He’s my nephew. close, just a couple of things. Welcome to the new mem- The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): All right. Does the bers. Mr. Naqvi, this is your first meeting— sponsor have any comments? Mr. Yasir Naqvi: It is. Mr. Bill Murdoch: Just that it’s a housecleaning sort The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): It is indeed, and Mr. of bill and they’d like to get on with it. Johnson, your first meeting. Welcome to the committee. The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): All right. Are there You can see the onerous responsibility we have and the any interested parties to this bill? Any interested parties? hard work that we do. Usually the committee meetings Anyone else? Okay. Parliamentary Assistant? are very rapid. Mr. Mario Sergio: As usual, I’d like to compliment Mr. Bas Balkissoon: We’re most efficient. the sponsor of the bill, the member from Owen Sound. The Chair (Mr. Michael Prue): We are very effi- He has come a long way to be present this morning in cient, and we have wonderful staff. support of his constituents. He does that very well and I’ve been told there are new fact binders available and with good flair.
Recommended publications
  • TEGH Merger Talks 'Ended'

    TEGH Merger Talks 'Ended'

    ww The East York EXOTIC PET PROTECTION n Zoocheck fighting to keep OBSERVER animals well cared-for. Page 3 Our 40th anniversary year.... Serving our community since 1972 Vol. 41, No. 3 www.torontoobserver.ca Friday, March 2, 2012 TEGH merger talks ‘ended’ By ZENAIRA ALI The Observer Merger talks between Toronto East General Hos- pital (TEGH) and The Scarborough Hospital (TSH) are over, according to TEGH’s chief executive. TEGH president and CEO Rob Devitt says that East General was approached by TSH in May 2011 about a merger that could help the two institutions save money. In November, they jointly paid $90,000 to Corpus Sanchez International (CSI) Consultancy to assess the potential risks and benefits. CSI’s report projected savings of up to $27.2 million in light of the administrative and operational changes that would result if the hospitals combined. But while the original merger proposal involved only administrative changes to the way the two hospitals would operate, it evolved into a proposal for a merger of some clinical operations as well. At that point, the Central East Local Health Integration Network (LHIN) — which the Scarborough Hospi- tal is a part of — asked TSH to also explore other Aldis Brennan /// Observer integration opportunities. Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae speaks to the media outside Liberal candidate Grant Gordon’s “In a nutshell, Central East LHIN had a meeting Toronto-Danforth campaign office on Saturday. Rae was in the riding in anticipation of the March last Wednesday where they directed TSH to look at 19 byelection, and addressed the growing scandal around allegations of bogus phone calls made least four other options in detail,” Devitt told the to voters during the last federal election by call centres affiliated with the Conservative party.
  • Neoliberalism: Progressive Conservative Urbanism in Toronto, Canada

    Neoliberalism: Progressive Conservative Urbanism in Toronto, Canada

    “Common-Sense” Neoliberalism: Progressive Conservative Urbanism in Toronto, Canada Roger Keil Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, Toronto, Canada; [email protected] This paper argues that urban neoliberalism can best be understood as a contradictory re-regulation of urban everyday life. Based on an analysis of neoliberalism as a new political economy and as a new set of technologies of power, the paper argues that the urban everyday is the site and product of the neoliberal transformation. Governments and corporations play a key role in redefining the conditions of everyday life through neoliberal policies and business practices. Part of this reorientation of everydayness, however, involves new forms of resistance and opposition, which include the kernel of a possible alternative urbanism. The epochal shift from a Keynesian-Fordist-welfarist to a post-Fordist-workfarist society is reflected in a marked restructuring of everyday life. The shift changes the socioeconomic conditions in cities. It also includes a reorienta- tion of identities, social conflicts, and ideologies towards a more explicitly culturalist differentiation. Social difference does not disappear, but actually becomes more pronounced; however, it gets articulated in or obscured by cultural terms of reference. The paper looks specifically at Toronto, Ontario, as a case study. An analysis of the explicitly neoliberal politics of the province’s Progressive Conservative (Tory) govern- ment under Mike Harris, first elected in 1995, demonstrates the pervasive re-regulation of everyday life affecting a wide variety of people in Toronto and elsewhere. Much of this process is directly attributable to provincial policies, a consequence of Canada’s constitutional system, which does not give municipalities autonomy but makes them “creatures of provinces.” However, the paper also argues that Toronto’s elites have aided and abetted the provincial “Common-Sense” Revolution through neoliberal policies and actions on their own.
  • Novae Res Urbis

    Novae Res Urbis

    FRIDAY, JUNE 16, 2017 REFUSAL 3 20 YEARS LATER 4 Replacing rentals Vol. 21 Stronger not enough No. 24 t o g e t h e r 20TH ANNIVERSARY EDITION NRU TURNS 20! AND THE STORY CONTINUES… Dominik Matusik xactly 20 years ago today, are on our walk selling the NRU faxed out its first City neighbourhood. But not the E of Toronto edition. For the developers. The question is next two decades, it covered whether the developers will the ups and downs of the city’s join the walk.” planning, development, and From 2017, it seems like municipal affairs news, though the answer to that question is a email has since replaced the fax resounding yes. machine. Many of the issues “One of the innovative the city cared about in 1997 still parts of the Regent Park resonate in 2017. From ideas for Revitalization,” downtown the new Yonge-Dundas Square city planning manager David to development charges along Oikawa wrote in an email the city’s latest subway line and to NRU, “was the concept of trepidations about revitalizing using [condos] to fund the Regent Park. It was an eventful needed new assisted public year. housing. A big unknown at The entire first edition of Novæ Res Urbis (2 pages), June 16, 1997 Below are some headlines from the time was [whether] that NRU’s first year and why these concept [would] work. Would issues continue to captivate us. private home owners respond to the idea of living and New Life for Regent Park investing in a mixed, integrated (July 7, 1997) community? Recently, some condo townhouses went on sale In 1997, NRU mused about the in Regent Park and were sold future of Regent Park.
  • Windsor Essex Catholic District School Board

    Windsor Essex Catholic District School Board

    Windsor-Essex Catholic District School Board 1325 California Avenue, Windsor, Ontario N9B 3Y6 Telephone: (519) 253-2481 Fax: (519) 253-0620 Joseph Berthiaume, Director of Education John Macri, Board Chairperson REGULAR BOARD MEETING Tuesday, November 28, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. Windsor Essex Catholic Education Centre John Paul II Boardroom AGENDA I In-Camera Meeting – 6:00 p.m. Page # II Regular Meeting of the Board - 7:00 p.m. 1. Call To Order 2. Opening Prayer 3. Recording of Attendance 4. Approval of Agenda 5. Questions Pertaining to Agenda 6. Disclosure of Interest - Pursuant to the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act. 7. Presentations 8. Delegations a. Delegation Regarding Items Not on the Agenda 3:11.1 Any person(s) wishing to make a formal presentation to the Board shall make their intent known, in writing, to the Secretary at least one week prior to the regular meeting. They shall briefly explain in their petition the nature of their business. Discussion shall be limited to the petition and shall be not longer than ten (10) minutes. The time limit can be waived by the consent of the majority of the Board. b. Delegations Regarding Items On the Agenda 3:11.2 Any person(s) wishing to appear before the Board and speak on an item appearing on the agenda of the Board Meeting has until NOON of the day of the Board meeting to make a request to the Secretary. They shall explain briefly the nature of their business. The discussion shall be limited to the item on the agenda and shall be no longer than ten (10) minutes.
  • The Waffle, the New Democratic Party, and Canada's New Left During the Long Sixties

    The Waffle, the New Democratic Party, and Canada's New Left During the Long Sixties

    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-13-2019 1:00 PM 'To Waffleo t the Left:' The Waffle, the New Democratic Party, and Canada's New Left during the Long Sixties David G. Blocker The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Fleming, Keith The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in History A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © David G. Blocker 2019 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons Recommended Citation Blocker, David G., "'To Waffleo t the Left:' The Waffle, the New Democratic Party, and Canada's New Left during the Long Sixties" (2019). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 6554. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/6554 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. i Abstract The Sixties were time of conflict and change in Canada and beyond. Radical social movements and countercultures challenged the conservatism of the preceding decade, rejected traditional forms of politics, and demanded an alternative based on the principles of social justice, individual freedom and an end to oppression on all fronts. Yet in Canada a unique political movement emerged which embraced these principles but proposed that New Left social movements – the student and anti-war movements, the women’s liberation movement and Canadian nationalists – could bring about radical political change not only through street protests and sit-ins, but also through participation in electoral politics.
  • A Warm and Enthusiastic Welcome St

    A Warm and Enthusiastic Welcome St

    Angela Kennedy Trustee Ward 11 City Wards 29, 30, 31, 32, 34 80 Sheppard Avenue East, North York, Ontario M2N 6E8 (416) 512-3411 • Fax: 512-3411 • E-mail: [email protected] Elementary Schools Annunciation 416-393-5299 Canadian Martyrs 416-393-5251 Holy Cross 416-393-5242 Holy Name 416-393-5215 St. Brigid 416-393-5235 A warm and enthusiastic welcome St. Catherine 416-393-5316 St. Denis 416-393-5310 SecondarySt. Isaac Jogues Schools 416-393-5315 St. John 416-393-5220 St. Joseph 416-393-5209 back and a special warm welcome to the new students in our Catholic Schools. I hope everyone had an enjoyable summer holiday and that the students are now filled ParishesNotre Dame 416-393-5501 with energy and eagerness to begin another year of learning. Senator O’Connor 416-393-5505 St. Patrick 416-393-5546 Last year was a successful school year: our students were involved in many celebra- tions, outings and festivals in addition to all their regularly scheduled classes and Annunciation Canadian Martyrs activities. I enjoyed attending many of our grade 8 graduations and witnessing Corpus Christi the achievements of our young students. As in the past, I was pleased to be able Holy Cross to attend many of our schools to present my Trustee Award to the student who exem- Holy Name St. Ann plified Catholic Leadership. St. Brigid St. Catherine The combined efforts of students, teachers, staff and parents, provide an environ- St.Elected John Officials – Ward 11 St.Toronto-Danforth, Joseph MP ment in our schools where students not only achieve but surpass their academic goals.
  • Recognized Parties: the 8 Member Critical Mass Question in Ontario

    Recognized Parties: the 8 Member Critical Mass Question in Ontario

    Recognized Parties: The 8 Member Critical Mass Question in Ontario Katherine Preiss, 2010-2011 Intern Ontario Legislature Internship Programme 1303A Whitney Block, Queen’s Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A2 Tel: 416-325-0040 Contact: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Legislative Assembly of Ontario is run by, and for, its political parties. House Business is entirely predicated upon the existence of political parties to divvy up duties among their members. Not just a creature of convention, the standing orders place a great deal of emphasis on the importance of the political party in the day-to-day functioning of the house. Although the political party is like to be a permanent fixture in Ontario politics, the current procedural structure leaves no room for effective independent MPPs. In order to have resources, funding, and even a guaranteed question in question period, a member must have party status. The intent of this study is to evaluate the 1999 decision to create an 8 member critical mass for recognized parties in the Standing orders, and the repercussions this decision had on the Ontario NDP following the 2003 provincial election. This paper seeks to answer the question: should there be a critical mass for recognized parties in Ontario? Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association (CPSA), Waterloo, ON, May 2011 This paper is a draft, please do not cite or distribute without the authors’ permission. 2 Introduction The political party is a fixture of Westminster style parliaments. By integrating the government with the legislature, Westminster parliament necessitates – at the very least – a governing party and an opposition party to both govern and hold the government to account.
  • Liberal Budget Draws Fire from East York Mpps

    Liberal Budget Draws Fire from East York Mpps

    THE EAST TORONTO Adventure INSIDEINSIDE in Peru Election fever PAGE 8 OBSERVER PAGES 4, 5 Friday • April 8 • 2011 PUBLISHEDPUBLISHED FOR THE BY COMMUNITY CENTENNIAL OF COLLEGE EAST YORK JOURNALISM BY THE JOURNALISM STUDENTS STUDENTSAND SERVING OF CENTENNIALEAST YORK COLLEGE Volume 41 • No. 5 Liberal budget draws fire from East York MPPs about cities… not addressing Prue, Tabuns areas such as transportation, housing and the environment wanted more — while continuing with corpo- rate tax cuts.” spending for Duncan countered that “the key decision for Ontarians E.Y. residents is how… do you get back to a balance,” adding: “We’ve laid By GEOFFREY MOSHER out 20 different initiatives… East York’s New Democratic that speak to MPPs have come out swinging transforming against the new provincial bud- government, get. reforming how Finance Minister Dwight we do govern- Observer, Dennis Wu Duncan tabled the budget last ment.” MARCHING FOR GREECE: (From left to right) Carmelo, Anna, Athena and Blake march in the week. It’s the provincial Lib- Peter eral government’s last budget Tabuns, the Greek Independence Day parade on March 27. The parade route ran along Danforth Avenue, between Donlands and Broadview avenues. before the Oct. 6 Ontario elec- TABUNS Toronto-Dan- tion — and is being described forth New by its backers as Ontario turn- Democratic MPP, also criti- ing the corner after the global cized the budget. recession. “Another big concern for East Potholes empty your pocket Duncan told the legislature York residents is the fact that that the Liberals are trying to despite the hype surround- By MELANIE SCHAWILL how fast they hit it,” he said.
  • Toronto City Summit Alliance Steering Committee

    Toronto City Summit Alliance Steering Committee

    For immediate release Politicians urged to tackle traffic woes 87% of residents say public transit should be regional spending priority Toronto – April 29, 2014 – On the eve of a new provincial budget, a majority of residents in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA) say they are more likely to vote for politicians who support new, dedicated dollars to get us moving. That’s the message CivicAction and a coalition of nearly two dozen business, labour, health, community, and environmental groups are delivering to Ontario MPPs and party leaders. The group points to the results of an April Angus Reid Forum poll* showing that 87% of GTHA residents want to see transportation as a regional spending priority, and 83% said they would more likely support new taxes or fees if they were put into a dedicated fund for transportation. Half of the GTHA’s elected officials - including more than 50% of MPPs across the three major political parties - have signed CivicAction’s “Get a Move On” pledge that calls for dedicated, efficient, and sustainable investment in our regional transportation priorities. They have been joined by thousands of GTHA residents. **See the full list below of politicians who have signed the CivicAction pledge. CivicAction and its partners are looking to all of Ontario’s party leaders to be clear on how they will invest in the next wave of transportation improvements for the region – both in the spring budget and in their party platforms. Quotes: “We cannot pass the buck for our aging infrastructure to the next generation,” says Sevaun Palvetzian, CEO of CivicAction.
  • Media Discourse and Paradigm Shifts in Canadian Refugee and Child Policy Frameworks by Lara Bober Department of Integrated Studi

    Media Discourse and Paradigm Shifts in Canadian Refugee and Child Policy Frameworks by Lara Bober Department of Integrated Studi

    Media discourse and paradigm shifts in Canadian refugee and child policy frameworks By Lara Bober Department of Integrated Studies in Education Faculty of Education McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada A thesis submitted to Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies Office In partial fulfullment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2014 © Lara Bober, 2014 Abstract This study draws on sociological theories of education and the methodological frameworks of Critical Discourse Analysis and Frames Theory and Analysis in order to examine print media representations of new immigrant, refugee, and precarious status children in the three Canadian newspapers, the Globe & Mail, National Post, and Toronto Star in the historical period of 1989-2009. The objective of this study is to analyze the ways in which media discourse provides ideological legitimacy to exclusionary immigration and refugee policies and the denial of social rights, and to identify media support for immigration justice campaigns. The historical period provides a context for the case study of the Toronto District School Board adopting a Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Policy in 2007 so that children without immigration status would be able to access schooling without the fear of being reported to immigration authorities. The educational experiences of new immigrant and refugee children have been considered from the lens of social justice research paradigms in terms of the opportunities and outcomes of schooling. This study contributes new knowledge that can be useful for children, educators, policy-makers, and social activists, about the ways in which Canadian media discourses frame children’s access to social rights and their experiences of education and migration.
  • Publicpower Platform

    Publicpower Platform

    publicpower: Practical Solutions for Ontario Howard Hampton and the Authorized by the CFO for the Ontario NDP publicpower: Ten Practical Solutions for Ontario • Stop hydro privatization and deregulation and ensure clean, reliable public power at cost. • Extend public home care, create 100 new Community Health Centres and cut long-term care user fees. Cancel plans for private MRI/CT clinics and privately built hospitals and put funds back into public health care. • Keep our drinking water public and protect water from source to tap. • Ensure every student has the opportunity to excel, guaranteed by a dedicated Education Excellence Fund that takes the politics out of education funding. No public funds for private schools. • Immediately increase the minimum wage to $8 an hour, prohibit scabs and treat injured workers fairly. • Freeze rents for two years, build at least 32,000 units of affordable housing and increase shelter allowances. • Cut tuition by 10 per cent and ensure that no student is denied a quality education or training for financial reasons. • Lower transit fares, shorten waits and reduce gridlock with a dedicated transportation trust fund. • Reduce child care fees to $10 a day for 18 month to 5 year olds in non-profit, regulated child care, and create 20,000 new child care spaces. • Protect your pension from inflation and let you take it with you from job to job. Howard Hampton and the NDP’s Practical Solutions Table of Contents Public Health Care...........................................................................................
  • An Analysis of the Orientation for Newly Elected Mpps in Ontario's By

    An Analysis of the Orientation for Newly Elected Mpps in Ontario's By

    At a Disadvantage? An Analysis of the Orientation for Newly Elected MPPs in Ontario’s By-Elections By: Aviva Levy 2009 – 10 Intern The Ontario Legislature Internship Programme (OLIP) 1303A Whitney Block Queen‟s Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A1 Phone: 416.325.0040 Email: [email protected] Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association Concordia University Montreal, Quebec June 2, 2010 1 Introduction By-elections are a curious case of democracy. Their sheer existence gives us a glimpse into the public‟s views on the issues of the day, a so-called “mini-referendum.” While many are interested in the campaigning of by-elections and their incessant media coverage, a subject few have studied is the socialization of these new members to their role, in the midst of an existing legislative session. A member gives up their seat at Queen‟s Park, a by-election is called, and, quicker than you can say “writ,” a new member is sworn in. The process is short, but not always sweet. New members elected in by-elections are faced with the struggle of orienting themselves to a place it can take years to figure out. While working at Queen‟s Park for ten months as part of the Ontario Legislature Internship Programme (OLIP), a total of four new Members of Provincial Parliament (MPPs) were sworn-in after having won their respective by-elections. One couldn‟t help but delve deeper into the topic of by-elections, as they seem to pop up ever so often. As of April 2010, a total of twenty members currently sitting at the Ontario Legislature were elected in by-elections, though two of them were previously elected in general elections (Greg Sorbara and Bob Chiarelli).