DOCSLIB.ORG

IEEE 802.3™ Industry Connections Feasibilty Assessment for the Next

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IEEE 802.3™ Industry Connections Feasibilty Assessment for the Next IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections Feasibility Assessment for the Next Generation of EPON March 2015 IEEE 802.3 Ethernet Working Group Communication From: IEEE 802.3 Ethernet Working Group1 Subject: Industry Connections Feasibility Assessment for the Next Generation of EPON CC: Paul Nikolich, Chair, IEEE 802 LMSC, <[email protected]> Date: 13th of March 2015 Approval: Agreed to at IEEE 802.3 Plenary meeting, Berlin, Germany, 12th of March 2015 In order to maintain an ongoing understanding of the industry trends, the IEEE 802.3 Next Generation Ethernet Passive Optical Network (NG-EPON) Ad Hoc was created. The scope of this ad hoc was to focus on gathering information that would enable an assessment of operator requirements, technical and economic feasibility, bandwidth needs for different types of applications served with EPON, including, but not limited to, residential and business customers. The attached assessment is the culmination of the open industry assessment performed by the ad hoc in 2014 and the first quarter of 2015. It includes a summary of the data brought forward by individuals throughout the EPON ecosystem, including operators, system integrators, chip vendors, optics suppliers, and others. All contributed information is solely the perspective of the respective contributors. It should be noted that all submitted data should be considered a snapshot of the perceived requirements for next generation EPON at the time of submission. Sincerely, David Law Chair, IEEE 802.3 Ethernet Working Group <[email protected]> 1 The views expressed in this document solely represents the position of the IEEE 802.3 Working Group, and do not necessarily represent a position of the IEEE, the IEEE Standards Association, or IEEE 802. 1 Copyright © 2015 IEEE. All rights reserved. IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections Feasibility Assessment for the Next Generation of EPON March 2015 IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections Feasibility Assessment for the Next Generation of EPON Prepared by the IEEE 802.3 Ethernet Working Group This is a report on the feasibility assessment for the Next Generation of Ethernet Passive Optical Network (EPON). This report can be found at the following URL: http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/ngepon/ng_epon_report.pdf Second printing: 19th March 2015 Participants The following individuals were officers and members of the IEEE 802.3 working group when this report was approved. Individuals may have not voted, voted for approval, disapproval or abstained on this report. David J. Law, IEEE 802.3 Working Group Chair Adam Healey, IEEE 802.3 Working Group Vice-Chair Pete Anslow, IEEE 802.3 Working Group Secretary Steven B. Carlson, IEEE 802.3 Working Group Executive Secretary Valerie Maguire, IEEE 802.3 Working Group Treasurer Howard Frazier, IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections NG-EPON Ad Hoc Chair, Phase 1 Marek Hajduczenia, IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections NG-EPON Ad Hoc Chair, Phase 2 Kevin Noll, IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections NG-EPON Ad Hoc Editor Ghani Abbas Michael Bennett Juan-Carlos Calderon John Abbott Gary Bernstein J. Martin Carroll David Abramson Vipul Bhatt Clark Carty Shadi Abughazaleh William Bliss Mandeep Chadha Faisal Ahmad Brad Booth David Chalupsky Michel Allard Martin Bouda Jacky Chang Dale Amason Edward Boyd Xin Chang J Michael Andrewartha David Brandt David Chen Pete Anslow Ralf-Peter Braun Wheling Cheng Oleksandr Babenko Theodore Brillhart Ahmad Chini Kwang-Hyun Baek Paul Brooks Golam Choudhury Amrik Bains Alan Brown Peter Cibula Koussalya Balasubramanian David Brown Christopher R. Cole Thananya Baldwin Matthew Brown Keith Conroy Denis Beaudoin Thomas Brown Eugene Dai Christian Beia Phillip Brownlee Shaoan Dai Yakov Belopolsky Mark Bugg John D'Ambrosia 2 Copyright © 2015 IEEE. All rights reserved. IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections Feasibility Assessment for the Next Generation of EPON March 2015 Mike Darling Mitsuru Iwaoka Laurence Matola Yair Darshan Kenneth Jackson Brett Mcclellan Piers Dawe Jack Jewell Thomas Mcdermott Fred Dawson Wenbin Jiang John McDonough Ian Dedic Andrew Jimenez Richard Mei William Delveaux Chad Jones Richard Mellitz John Dickinson Antony Joseph Bryan Moffitt Chris Diminico Yasuaki Kawatsu Leo Montreuil Thuyen Dinh Michael Kelsen Paul Mooney Curtis Donahue Yong Kim Charles Moore Dan Dove Jonathan King Andy Moorwood Mike Dudek Scott Kipp Thomas Mueller David Dwelley Michael Klempa Ron Muir Hesham Elbakoury Avi Kliger Dale Murray David Estes Curtis Knittle Henry Muyshondt John Ewen Shigeru Kobayashi Edward Nakamoto Josef Faller Keisuke Kojima Gary Nicholl Arash Farhoodfar Paul Kolesar Paul Nikolich Shahar Feldman Tom Kolze John Nolan German Feyh Glen Kramer Ronald Nordin Alan Flatman Albert Kuo Mark Nowell Richard Frosch Hans Lackner David Ofelt Michael Furlong Efstathios Larios Ichiro Ogura Andrew Gardner Wayne Larsen Tom Palkert Mike Gardner Ryan Latchman Sujan Pandey Ali Ghiasi Mark Laubach Sesha Panguluri Joel Goergen Greg Le Cheminant Carlos Pardo Zhigang Gong Arthur Lee Moon Park Steven Gorshe Andre Lessard Pravin Patel James Graba David Lewis Petar Pepeljugoski Robert Grow Lei Li Gerald Pepper Mark Gustlin Mike Peng Li Ruben Perez De Aranda Alonso Bernie Hammond Shaohua Li Michael Peters Jeffrey Heath Thomas Lichtenegger John Petrilla Carl Herman Ru Jian Lin Rick Pimpinella David Hess Robert Lingle Neven Pischl Yasuo Hidaka James liu Rainer Poehmerer Riu Hirai Zhenyu Liu William Powell Thomas Hogenmueller William Lo Richard Prodan Brian Holden Miklos Lukacs Rick Rabinovich Rita Horner Kent Lusted Saifur Rahman Bernd Horrmeyer Jeffery Maki Adee Ran Victor Hou James Malkemus Ram Rao Rui Hua Yonatan Malkiman Alon Regev Liang-wei Huang Edwin Mallette Duane Remein Scott Irwin Arthur Marris Victor Renteria Kazuhiko Ishibe Chris Mash Michael Ressl Hideki Isono Kirsten Matheus Poldi (Pavlick) Rimboim Tom Issenhuth Erdem Matoglu Christopher Roth 2 Copyright © 2015 IEEE. All rights reserved. IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections Feasibility Assessment for the Next Generation of EPON March 2015 Salvatore Rotolo Andre Szczepanek Paul Vanderlaan Hisaya Sakamoto William Szeto Robert Wagner Vineet Salunke Bharat Tailor Robert Wang Sam Sambasivan Akio Tajima Tongtong Wang Yasuo Sasaki Takayuki Tajima Xiaofeng Wang Fred Schindler Tomoo Takahara Xinyuan Wang Stefan Schneele Satoshi Takahashi Zhong Feng Wang Peter Scruton Kiyoto Takahata David Warren Alexander Seiger Alexander Tan Markus Weber Naoshi Serizawa Toshiki Tanaka Brian Welch Megha Shanbhag Mehmet Tazebay Yang Wen Masood Shariff Brian Teipen Matthias Wendt Stephen Shellhammer Geoffrey Thompson Oded Wertheim Bazhong Shen Alan Tipper Natalie Wienckowski Mizuki Shirao Pirooz Tooyserkani Ludwig Winkel Kapil Shrikhande Nathan Tracy Peter Wu Jeff Slavick David Tremblay Yu Xu Scott Sommers Albert Tretter Lennart Yseboodt Yoshiaki Sone Stephen Trowbridge Liquan Yuan Xiaolu Song Wen-Cheng Tseng Hayato Yuki Tom Souvignier Yoshihiro Tsukamoto Garold Yurko Bryan Sparrowhawk Mike Tu Andrew Zambell Edward Sprague Alan Ugolini Jin Zhang Peter Stassar John Ulm Yan Zhuang Leonard Stencel Ed Ulrichs George Zimmerman Robert Stone Musa Unmehopa Helge Zinner Ken-Ichi Suzuki Sterling A. Vaden Pavel Zivny Steve Swanson Stefano Valle Gaoling Zou 3 Copyright © 2015 IEEE. All rights reserved. IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections Feasibility Assessment for the Next Generation of EPON March 2015 Trademarks and Disclaimers IEEE believes the information in this publication is accurate as of its publication date; such information is subject to change without notice. IEEE is not responsible for any inadvertent errors. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 3 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5997, USA Copyright © 2015 by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. All rights reserved. Published March 2015. Figure 11 through Figure 14 used with permission from Sandvine, 1H 2014 Global Internet Phenomena Report, © 2014 IEEE and 802 are registered trademarks in the U. S. Patent & Trademark Office, owned by The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Incorporated. IEEE prohibits discrimination, harassment, and bullying. For more information, visit http://www.ieee.org/web/aboutus/whatis/policies/p9-26.html. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. To order IEEE Press Publications, call 1-800-678-IEEE. Find IEEE standards and standards-related product listings at: http://standards.ieee.org 2 Copyright © 2015 IEEE. All rights reserved. IEEE 802.3 Industry Connections Feasibility Assessment for the Next Generation of EPON March 2015 Notice and Disclaimer of Liability Concerning the Use of IEEE-SA Industry Connections Documents This IEEE Standards Association (“IEEE-SA”) Industry Connections publication (“Work”) is not a consensus standard document. Specifically, this document is NOT AN IEEE STANDARD. Information contained in this Work has been created by, or obtained from, sources believed to be reliable, and reviewed by members of the IEEE-SA Industry Connections activity that produced this Work. IEEE and the IEEE-SA Industry Connections activity members expressly disclaim all warranties (express, implied, and statutory) related to this Work, including, but not limited to, the warranties of: merchantability; fitness for a particular purpose; non-infringement; quality, accuracy, effectiveness, currency, or completeness of the Work or content within the Work. In addition, IEEE and the IEEE-SA Industry Connections activity members
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download (PDF)
    FEDERAL REGULATION AND COMPETITIVE ACCESS TO MULTIPLE-UNIT PREMISES: MORE CHOICE IN COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES? LYNNE HOLT* & MARK JAMISON** I. INTRODUCTION The nature of competition in the United States’ communications sector changed significantly over the past two decades. Before the 1990s, ‘‘competition’’ referred to the fight among providers of discrete services, such as the contest among AT&T, MCI, and Sprint over the long- distance slice of the communications pie. Today, competition is much more likely to describe the fight over the entire pie, among firms offering a ‘‘triple play’’ of services----high-speed Internet service, video, and t e l e p h o n y ----over a single broadband platform. Some firms recently expanded the pie with a ‘‘quadruple play’’ that includes wireless services as well. Cable operators, traditional wireline telephone companies, and, increasingly, wireless providers are competing to offer consumers both the underlying broadband platform and various bundled services that ride across it. However, not all consumers benefit from this competition in like manner.1 Public policy deliberations tend to focus more on differences in access to communications services either between consumers in rural and * Dr. Lynne Holt, Policy Analyst, Public Utility Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7142, [email protected]. ** Dr. Mark A. Jamison, Director, Public Utility Research Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-7142, [email protected]. The authors appreciate the review by Mr. William Cox, Able Band Chartered, and his suggestions for improving an earlier version of this paper. 1. For example, the staff of the New York Public Service Commission found differences between geographic areas in terms of the competitive alternatives that customers enjoyed.
    [Show full text]
  • Voip My House -- How to Quickly Distribute a Voip Phone Line to Your Entire House Voip My House How to Quickly Distribute a Voip Phone Line to Your Entire House
    VoIP My House -- How to quickly distribute a VoIP phone line to your entire house VoIP My House How to quickly distribute a VoIP phone line to your entire house - Unlimited calling to U.S. and over 60 other countries - $10/month for 6 months, then $28/month - Sign up and get a $50 e-gift card - Get full details TIP: Review this entire web page article before working on your house, especially the DSL warning [§20] and Disclaimer [§23]. 1. VoIP - the new way 10. Ringer Equivalence 20. DSL warning 2. POTS - the old way Number 21. The cost of 'always 3. VoIP advantages 11. Twisted Pairs on' 4. VoIP disadvantages 12. Structured Wiring 22. More Information 5. POTS network 13. Alarm systems 23. Disclaimer interface 14. Color coding standards 24. Feedback 6. POTS phone jack 15. Safest VoIP solution 7. VoIP phone jack 17. Phone line polarity 8. The VoIP solution 18. Splicing wires 9. An ounce of 19. Verizon sucks prevention 1. VoIP - Phone service the new way VoIP = Voice over IP (internet) Most of us have high speed Internet in our homes -- so why not use the Internet to connect your whole house directly to a new (and cheaper) phone company's network? Quite simply, that is what VoIP can do for you. VoIP: 'Voice over IP': Connecting to a newer phone company's network directly (via the Internet instead of by dedicated copper wire), providing you with a device which provides phone service (a dial tone). And yes, you can connect your whole house to VoIP [§8], and you can continue to use all of the phones that you are using right now.
    [Show full text]
  • PS-102 Dominic Ruggiero New Developments in FTTH
    PS-102 Dominic Ruggiero New Developments in FTTH 2012 FTTH Conference & Expo: The Future Is Now – Dallas, Texas New Developments in FTTH Dominic Ruggiero-FTTH System Engineer Multicom, Inc 1076 Florida Central Parkway, Longwood FL 32750 [email protected] (800) 423-2594 (407)-331-7779 Table of Contents Introduction 3 PON Systems 4-5 Next Gen Networks 6 User Applications 7 Conclusion 8 New Developments in FTTH- Dominic Ruggiero 2012 FTTH Conference & Expo: The Future Is Now – Dallas, Texas Introduction It's been almost three decades in the making, but fiber to the home (FTTH) is finally emerging into the mainstream and is set to transform the telecom environment worldwide over the next decade. FTTH represents the first major upgrade to the access network since the deployment of cellular infrastructure in the 80s and 90s, and like cellular, it is likely to have a deep impact on the entire supply chain, including technology vendors and network operators. Over the next 15 to 20 years, copper access networks worldwide will be largely replaced by a fiber access network, creating massive opportunities for vendors, network builders, and service providers. The most important catalyst for this change is a growing perception that copper access networks will soon no longer be able to meet the ever- growing consumer demand for bandwidth, driven mainly by the Internet, IP, and the many services running over it. At the same time, competition to move customers onto complex service packages that include video is leading some to conclude that they must be first to deploy fiber, pre-empting or frustrating future competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access Networks and National Broadband Plans: Tales from Down
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Beltrán, Fernando Conference Paper Open access networks and national broadband plans: Tales from down 19th Biennial Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Moving Forward with Future Technologies: Opening a Platform for All", Bangkok, Thailand, 18th-21th November 2012 Provided in Cooperation with: International Telecommunications Society (ITS) Suggested Citation: Beltrán, Fernando (2012) : Open access networks and national broadband plans: Tales from down, 19th Biennial Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): "Moving Forward with Future Technologies: Opening a Platform for All", Bangkok, Thailand, 18th-21th November 2012, International Telecommunications Society (ITS), Calgary This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/72525 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens Construction Guidelines
    Construction Guidelines for Providing Communications Services TABLE OF CONTENTS Residential Home Wiring...................................................................................................................................Page 3 Pre-Construction Checklist........................................................................................................Page 4 Line Extensions..............................................................................................................................Page 4 Mobile Home Parks Basic Requirements......................................................................................................................Page 5 Subdivisions/Parcel Divisions Basic Requirements......................................................................................................................Page 6 Trenching Basic Requirements......................................................................................................................Page 7 Examples of How Citizens Handles Buried Telecommunication Drop Applications Example A........................................................................................................................................Page 8 Example B.........................................................................................................................................Page 8 Customer Responsibilities for Communication Facilities on Drop Applications Multi-Residential and Commercial Service Requirements............................................Page
    [Show full text]
  • Telecom Acronym Guide
    Telecom Acronym Guide Fourth Edition Telecom Acronym Guide Fourth Edition Numerics ACAC Actual Call Admission Control 2F Two-fiber ACEG Alternating Current Equipment Ground 10 GbE 10 Gigabit Ethernet ACK Acknowledge 10 GFC 10 Gigabit Fibre Channel (Same as FC1200) ACL Active Control List; Access Control List 100G 100 Gigabits ACO Alarm Cutoff 16-QAM 16 (points) Quadrature Amplitude Modulation ACQ Acquire 3D Three-dimensional ACR Allowed Cell Rate 3G Third Generation ACS Automatic Channel Shutdown; Alarm Correlation and Suppression 3GPP Third Generation Partnership Project ACSE Association Control Service Element 40G 40 Gigabits ACSS Automatic Channel Shutdown Suppression; 4C Consortium of Intel, IBM, Matsushita, and Toshiba Automatic Channel Shutdown State 4F Four-fiber ACT Active 4G Fourth Generation ADC Analog-to-Digital Converter; Add/Drop Coupler 5C Consortium of Intel, Sony, Matsushita, Toshiba, ADI Asset Distribution Interface and Hitachi ADM Add/Drop Multiplexer 5G Fifth Generation ADP Actual Departure Potential; Automatic A Data Processing ADSL Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line A/D Analog-to-digital ADT Actual Departure Time; Automatic AAL ATM Adaptation Layer Data Transmission AAL0 ATM Adaptation Layer Type 0 AE Automation Engine; Automation Environment A AL1 ATM Adaptation Layer Type 1 AES Advanced Encryption Standard; AAL2 ATM Adaptation Layer 2 Transport Application Environment Specific AAL3/4 ATM Adaptation Layer Types 3 and 4 AESA ATM End System Address; ATM End Station AAL5 ATM Adaptation Layer 5 Address ABR Available Bit
    [Show full text]
  • ATA and Evolving Terminology
    Select Engineered Systems Field Bulletin: December 2013 ATA and Evolving Terminology As the Cable industry (CATV) has evolved from Analog/RF to digital transmission methods, addition- al services such as Internet access and Telephony, are being offered to customers. SES is primarily interested in Telephony as it affects our products. The first attempts to integrate telephony into Ca- ble equipment used discrete devices called ATAs (Analog to Telephone Adapters). ATAs convert and digitize analog voice signals for transmission to the Cable Plant and also provide the voltages and signals expected by most phone equipment. These were usually proprietary to a specific Cable Plant operation and varied widely from one CATV operator to another. Below left, is a typical example of a discrete ATA: As the Cable industry (CATV) continued to evolve, ATA circuitry became incorporated into what are known as: Cable Modems. This simplified both installation and operation and in many markets, this technology came to replace standard analog telephone equipment. In the example (above right) is a Cable Modem offering TV hookup, Internet Service, (through an Ethernet connector) and Phone ser- vice through RJ11 jacks. Therefore, what is typically thought of as an “ATA” is now incorporated directly into the CATV operator-provided equipment. Recently, Service Providers have moved away from the more generic term ATA in favor of marketing specific terms for the equipment they lease or provide. One such example is ComCast’s XFINITY system, which has various components depend- ing on the features desired. Features and accessory components may vary widely around the coun- try. The component used for telephone service is currently called an “eMTA” for embedded MultiMedia Terminal Adapter and some other examples are shown below.
    [Show full text]
  • X6010 Network Interface Device (NID)
    ION System x6010 Managed T1/E1-to-Fiber Network Interface Device (NID) User Guide 33493 Rev. D Transition Networks ION x6010 User Guide Trademarks All trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Copyright Notice/Restrictions Copyright © 2010-2017 Transition Networks. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical) without written permission from Transition Networks. Printed in the U.S.A. ION System x6010 Managed T1/E1-to-Fiber Network Interface Device (NID) User Guide, 33493 Rev. D Contact Information Transition Networks 10900 Red Circle Drive Minnetonka, MN 55343 USA tel: +1.952.941.7600 | toll free: 1.800.526.9267 | fax: 952.941.2322 Revision History Rev Date Description A 05/23/11 Revised for firmware version 1.1.0. B 09/08/11 Revised for firmware version 1.2.0. C 12/23/16 Revised for firmware version 1.2.6 and updated default and LBO settings. D 3/3/17 Add DoC and update contact information. 33493 Rev. D https://www.transition.com/ Page 2 of 293 Transition Networks ION x6010 User Guide Cautions and Warnings Definitions Cautions indicate that there is the possibility of poor equipment performance or potential damage to the equipment. Warnings indicate that there is the possibility of injury to person. Cautions and Warnings appear here and may appear throughout this manual where appropriate. Failure to read and understand the information identified by this symbol could result in poor equipment performance, damage to the equipment, or injury to persons.
    [Show full text]
  • The AT&T U-Verse Service Douglas A. Kerr Issue 2 June 5, 2009
    The AT&T U-verse Service Douglas A. Kerr Issue 2 June 5, 2009 ABSTRACT AND INTRODUCTION U-verse telecommunication service, offered by AT&T through its operating telephone companies in many areas, uses a single very high speed digital subscriber line (VDSL) over a cable pair, or a comparable fiber link, to deliver to a residence telephone service, high-speed Internet access, and television programming. The system design provides great flexibility in the kinds of wiring over which signals may be carried between different system devices within the premises, facilitating deployment of the service. In this article, we review the basic concepts, architecture, and features of this service, with emphasis on these various interconnection modes. The story of the U-verse installation at the author’s home is given. An appendix gives technical details of the VDSL transmission system used in one form of the U-verse service. CAVEAT My knowledge of any of the details of the U-verse service goes back only about three weeks. Much of the information in this article has been gleaned by reading between the lines of the extensive palaver about the service to be found on the internet, and from the vague, ambiguous, or broad information on the Web sites of the service provider and the various equipment manufacturers. Much comes from interpretation of observations made of the recent installation here at our home. There is accordingly a substantial hazard that my information may not be fully correct nor comprehensive. U-VERSE BASICS Service packages U-verse service packages are available that include any or all of these: • Telephone service—one or two lines • Internet access—various nominal rate packages available, including 6 Mb/s downstream, 1 Mb/s upstream and (in many areas) 18 Mb/s downstream, 1.5 Mb/s upstream.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCSIS® Provisioning of EPON Specifications Dpoev1.0 Dpoe
    DOCSIS® Provisioning of EPON Specifications DPoEv1.0 DPoE Architecture Specification DPoE-SP-ARCHv1.0-C01-160830 CLOSED Notice This DPoE™ specification is the result of a cooperative effort undertaken at the direction of Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. for the benefit of the cable industry and its customers. You may download, copy, distribute, and reference the documents herein only for the purpose of developing products or services in accordance with such documents, and educational use. Except as granted by CableLabs in a separate written license agreement, no license is granted to modify the documents herein (except via the Engineering Change process), or to use, copy, modify or distribute the documents for any other purpose. This document may contain references to other documents not owned or controlled by CableLabs. Use and understanding of this document may require access to such other documents. Designing, manufacturing, distributing, using, selling, or servicing products, or providing services, based on this document may require intellectual property licenses from third parties for technology referenced in this document. To the extent this document contains or refers to documents of third parties, you agree to abide by the terms of any licenses associated with such third party documents, including open source licenses, if any. Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. 2011- 2016 Confidential DPoE-SP-ARCHv1.0-C01-160830 DOCSIS® Provisioning of EPON Specifications DISCLAIMER This document is furnished on an "AS IS" basis and neither CableLabs nor its members provides any representation or warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, noninfringement, or fitness for a particular purpose of this document, or any document referenced herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Eligible Services List
    Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism Eligible Services List CC Docket No. 02-6; GN Docket No. 09-51 Released: October 22, 2013 The Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC’s) rules provide that all services that are eligible for to receive discounts under the Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism (otherwise known as the E-rate program or “E-rate”) are listed in this Eligible Services List (ESL). The E-rate program is administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC). Background: The E-rate program provides eligible schools and libraries discounts for eligible services and products. Consistent with prior years, in each category the ESL first lists the services and products that are eligible for funding, and then lists the services and products that are not eligible for funding. E-rate funds are allocated according to rules of priority. Requests for telecommunications services, telecommunications, and Internet access services have first priority for funding; the ESL lists these services in the “Priority One” section. Requests for support for internal connections and basic maintenance of internal connections are eligible for the funding that remains after priority one requests are funded; the ESL lists these services in the “Priority Two” section. There is also a Miscellaneous section, a Special Eligibility Conditions section, and a Glossary, providing additional information and definitions for many of the terms used herein. Note on FCC Form 471. For Block 5 of the FCC Form 471, for Priority One services, applicants must indicate the services they select as a Priority One Telecommunications Service or Priority One Internet Access.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 Eligible Services List December 18
    CC DOCKET NO. 96- 451 SCHOOLS AND LIBRARIES2, 3 Eligible Services List The primary purpose of the services for which support is sought must be the delivery of services to the classrooms or other places of instruction at schools and libraries that meet the statutory definition of an eligible institution. Support for the administrative functions of library or education programs is permitted so long as the services are part of the network of shared services for learning. Support will be limited to services delivered to the onsite educational facility or facilities.4 The eligibility of a product/service is not solely dependent on the item itself, but also on the use for which it is intended. The use of an otherwise eligible product/service by an ineligible entity, or for an ineligible purpose, is not eligible for discount under the "E-Rate" program. The eligibility of the products/services identified on this list assumes their use is intended to be by eligible entities, for eligible purposes. Items in Bold indicate a modification or clarification of product or service eligibility as of December 18, 2000. SERVICE ELEMENT/DESCRIPTION ELIGIBLE YES/NO 900 "900" is an information service area code, or dial access code, used to reach a No wide range of information providers. Examples of the information that may be provided via a 900 number are adult content programming, weather reports, lottery results, or caller voting for various topics such as television polls. 900 Service calls are charged to the party originating the call. Charges for accessing 900 calls are often included in the toll charges on the local telephone bill.
    [Show full text]