UNIVERSAL VERSUS ECONOMICALLY POLARIZED CHANGE IN AGE AT FIRST BIRTH: A FRENCH-BRITISH COMPARISON Michael S. Rendall*, Olivia Ekert-Jaffé**, Heather Joshi***, Kevin Lynch****, and Rémi Mougin** ABSTRACT France and the United Kingdom in the 1980s and 1990s represented two contrasting institutional models for the integration of employment and motherhood: The ‘universalistic’ regime type offering subsidized child-care and maternity-leave benefits at all income levels; and the ‘means-testing’ regime type mainly offering income-tested benefits for single mothers. Using the two countries as comparative case studies, we develop and test the hypothesis that the socio-economic gradient of fertility timing has become increasingly mediated by family policy. We find increasing polarization in age at first birth by pre-childbearing occupation in the U.K. but not in France. Early first births persisted in the U.K. only among women in low-skill occupations, while shifts towards increasingly late first births occurred in clerical/secretarial occupations and above. Age at first birth increased across all occupations in France, but was still much earlier on average than for all but low-skill British mothers. * RAND, Santa Monica, U.S.A. ** Institut National d’Etudes Démographiques, France. *** Institute of Education, University of London, United Kingdom. **** Office for National Statistics, United Kingdom. Acknowledgements: Please direct correspondence to the first author at: RAND, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138,
[email protected]. The authors gratefully acknowledge support from grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD043472, and R24-HD050906), the U.K. Nuffield Foundation, and from a visiting-scholar award to the first author from the Institut National d’Etudes Démographiques (INED), France.