Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 SEA Environmental Report Appendices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 SEA Environmental Report Appendices Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 SEA Environmental Report Appendi ces ________________________________ ___________________ Ricardo Energy & Environment Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 - SEA Appendices | 1 Appendix A: Figures of key interest features Appendix A is presented separately and consists of the following maps: A.1. SSSI, SPA, SAC, Ramsar and Ancient Woodland designations. A.2. AONB, NNR, LNR and National Trails. A.3. WFD waterbody classifications. A.4. WFD Groundwater Quantitative status. A.5. Agricultural Land Classification. A.6. Air Quality Management Areas. A.7. World Heritage Sites, Scheduled Monuments and Registered Parks and Gardens. A.8. Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and National Character Areas. Ricardo Energy & Environment Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 - SEA Appendices | 2 Appendix B: Drought Permits – Hydrological Zone of Influence Appendix B provides the hydrological zone of influence for the Blagdon, Chew and Cheddar Reservoir drought permit options as presented within the Environmental Monitoring Report (EMP) undertaken in 2007. The figures have subsequently been updated in 2017. Ref: Ricardo/ED62546/ Ricardo Energy & Environment Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 - SEA Appendices | 3 Figure B1: Blagdon Reservoir drought permit zone of influence [This figure has been redacted for security reasons] Ref: Ricardo/ED62546/ Ricardo Energy & Environment Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 - SEA Appendices | 4 Figure B2: Chew Reservoir drought permit zone of influence [This figure has been redacted for security reasons] Ref: Ricardo/ED62546/ Ricardo Energy & Environment Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 - SEA Appendices | 5 Figure B3: Cheddar Reservoir drought permit zone of influence [This figure has been redacted for security reasons] Ref: Ricardo/ED62546/ Ricardo Energy & Environment Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 - SEA Appendices | 6 Appendix C: Consultee responses to the SEA Scoping Report Appendix C is the consultee responses to the SEA scoping report and subsequent updates to the assessment. Table C1: Environment Agency consultee response Question Consultee Response Comment and Amendments The maps are presented as appendices due to the Q1. Do you have any comments on the Purpose is clear, but it would have been useful if the image size of the maps and therefore to assist structure and purpose of the Scoping diagrams (B set) were embedded in the document. downloading of the document from the water company Report? If so, please provide details. website for stakeholders. Q2. Do you agree with the SEA spatial The list of options in Tables 1.1 and 1.2 is also very The drought plan does not affect most of the company’s area under consideration (see Figure high level. It is not clear where existing sources of water sources and the SEA is focused on assessing the 1.2)? If you disagree, please explain water are abstracted and treated and where potential effect of the measures contained in the drought plan, why and what changes you consider are sources of water can be utilised in a drought. The rather than the operation of all water sources. required. SEA may need to cover a wider area if additional The SEA Scoping Report covers the geographical area sources are identified on the boundary perimeter or affected by the Drought Plan and there are no water outside the boundary. sources or environments affected beyond the boundary presented in the Scoping Report. The Environmental Report provides more specific details as to the measures included in the plan. Q3. Do you agree with the approach to It is not clear how close or whether any of BW’s References in this Environmental Report reflect the assessing the environmental baseline existing practices impact upon the designated sites relevant supporting data appendices. (see Section 3)? If you disagree, please listed in 3.2.1. Table C1 on p28 does not refer you to Table B1 (now Table E1, in Appendix E of this explain why and what changes you the supporting information, so needs amending to Environmental Report) updated to include other consider are required. Table B1. Table B1 should also list all Ramsar, SSSI, environmental designations. Figures updated in this NNR’s and LNR’s in the area. From a WFD Environmental Report (Appendix A) to include the perspective, it’s also not clear how extensive INNS location of the Drought Plan measures to give context are within the boundary and if cross catchment to their location in relation to designated sites. The pumping could pose a risk to spreading INNS. significance of effect assessments (Appendix F of this Ref: Ricardo/ED62546/ Ricardo Energy & Environment Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 - SEA Appendices | 7 Environmental Report) provide details of any effects on any of these designated sites. There seems to be a lack of quantitative evidence with the baseline conditions. For example, in 3.2.1 The risk of spreading INNS is assessed for each how much ancient woodland is there? Is the local drought measure separately and reported in Appendix aspiration to protect existing areas, or expand F of this Environmental Report. Where information is designations in next 10 years? If we don’t have a known regarding the presence of INNS, this has been baseline, we can’t measure if there has been an provided in the significance of effect assessments. A improvement. Another example in 3.3.1. UK health in precautionary approach has been followed where data generally ‘good’, what does this mean for the SW? gaps exist regarding the presence of INNS. No new How can the plan contribute towards increasing life raw water cross-catchment pumping is proposed as quality and expectancy? In Recreation and Tourism, part of the Bristol Water Drought Plan, hence this is not we don’t know how many visitors there are to the a risk. area and how this may impact on resource. Some Environmental baseline data have been provided at a sections are better than others, but all need checking level consistent with the strategic nature of the to ensure quantitative data is included in baseline. assessment and focused on the likely effects of the Greenbelt is mentioned in 3.9.1. but does not give Drought Plan. In many cases, specific quantitative data any indication of where the green belts are located. are not readily available and/or up-to-date for the geographical area likely to be affected. Where further quantitative baseline data have been acquired, these have been added to the environmental baseline section of this Environmental Report. The baseline information helps provide the environmental context against which the assessment of the plan will be carried out; however, further, more specific data are used within this Environmental Report for assessing the specific local receptors and environments that are likely to be affected by the measures contained within the Drought Plan. It does not include any policies or strategic plans of The proposed drought measures in the Drought Plan the Canal & River Trust, which provide water to BW. would not affect the Canal & River Trust’s abstractions Q4. Are the plans and programmes that In addition, there were no such plans reviewed from and nor would the Drought Plan alter the amounts of have been reviewed appropriate (see any third sector organisations such as Wildlife Trusts water provided by the Canal & River Trust to Bristol Section 2)? If not, please explain why. and RSPB, who would both have in interest where Water. LNR’s and SAC/SPA/RAMSAR sites may be Plans and programmes of third sector organisations affected. have been reviewed where relevant to the Drought Plan measures being assessed; details have been added to Ref: Ricardo/ED62546/ Ricardo Energy & Environment Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 - SEA Appendices | 8 the review of programmes and plans in this Environmental Report, for example plans of local Wildlife Trusts, including Avon Wildlife Trust who manage the reserve at Chew Valley Lakes. The RSPB does not have any tenancy or reserves at any of the three reservoirs where drought permit measures are proposed in the Drought Plan. We have included reference to the joint RSPB, Environment Agency, CCW and Natural England guidance on SEA and biodiversity as well as RSPB’s national policy statement on protection of designated sites in the Review of Policies and Plans in this Environmental Report (Appendix D). Q5. Are you aware of other plans or Not specifically, but the organisations mentioned in As explained above for Q4, we have reviewed relevant programmes that should be considered Q4 do have strategic plans for improving the strategic plans and updated the programmes and plans (see Section 2)? If so, please provide environment. review accordingly (Appendix D of this Environmental references. Report). Q6. Are you aware of any further baseline data or indicators that might provide useful information in relation to Common Standards Monitoring Guidance for SPA, We have considered the Commons Standards the scope of the Drought Plan (see SAC and Ramsar sites. Monitoring Guidance in carrying out the SEA and the Section 4)? If so, please provide this accompanying HRA where relevant. information or a source for the data. Q7. Taking account of the SEA Regulations and associated guidance, Yes, they seem appropriate for the plans reviewed. are the environmental issues identified There may be further local issues/opportunities which for Bristol Water Drought Plan arise once the third sector plans/programmes are Noted – please see comments in response to Q4 appropriate (see Section 3)? If not, reviewed. above. please explain why and what changes you consider are required. Q8. Taking account of the SEA Acknowledged. In carrying out the significance of The scoping report does not acknowledge that in Regulations and associated guidance, effects of assessment in this Environmental Report some scenarios, the Common Standard Monitoring do the environmental objectives (and accompanying HRA Report), the Common Guidance will take precedent over WFD for encompass all the necessary issues Standard Monitoring Guidance has been considered in Ref: Ricardo/ED62546/ Ricardo Energy & Environment Bristol Water Drought Plan 2018 - SEA Appendices | 9 (see Section 4)? If not, please explain designated sites.
Recommended publications
  • Pleistocene Rodents of the British Isles
    PLEISTOCENE RODENTS OF THE BRITISH ISLES BY ANTONY JOHN SUTCLIFFE British Museum (Natural History), London AND KAZIMIERZ KOWALSKI Institute of Systematic and Experimental Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland Pp. 31-147 ; 31 Text-figures ; 13 Tables BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) GEOLOGY Vol. 27 No. 2 LONDON: 1976 THE BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM (natural history), instituted in 1949, is issued in five series corresponding to the Scientific Departments of the Museum, and an Historical series. Parts will appear at irregular intervals as they become ready. Volumes will contain about three or four hundred pages, and will not necessarily be completed within one calendar year. In 1965 a separate supplementary series of longer papers was instituted, numbered serially for each Department. This paper is Vol. 27, No. 2, of the Geological [Palaeontological) series. The abbreviated titles of periodicals cited follow those of the World List of Scientific Periodicals. World List abbreviation : Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Geol. ISSN 0007-1471 Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), 1976 BRITISH MUSEUM (NATURAL HISTORY) Issued 29 July, 1976 Price £7.40 . PLEISTOCENE RODENTS OF THE BRITISH ISLES By A. J. SUTCLIFFE & K. KOWALSKI CONTENTS Page Synopsis ........ 35 I. Introduction ....... 36 A. History of Studies ..... 37 B. The Geological Background .... 40 II. Localities in the British Isles with fossil rodents 42 A. Deposits OF East Anglia . .... 42 (i) Red Crag 43 (ii) Icenian Crag ....... 43 (iii) Cromer Forest Bed Series ..... 46 (a) Pastonian of East Runton and Happisburgh 47 (b) Beestonian ...... 48 (c) Cromerian, sensu stricto .... 48 (d) Anglian ......
    [Show full text]
  • Clifton & Hotwells Character Appraisal
    Conservation Area 5 Clifton & Hotwells Character Appraisal & Management Proposals June 2010 www.bristol.gov.uk/conservation Prepared by: With special thanks to: City Design Group Clifton and Hotwells Improvement Society Bristol City Council Brunel House St. Georges Road Bristol BS1 5UY www.bristol.gov.uk/conservation June 2010 CLIFTON & HOTWELLS CONTENTSCharacter Appraisal 1. INTRODUCTION P. 1 2. PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT P. 1 3. LOCATION & SETTING P. 2 4. SUMMARY OF CHARACTER & SPECIAL INTEREST P. 4 5. HisTORIC DEVELOPMENT & ARCHAEOLOGY P. 5 6. SPATIAL ANALYSIS 6.1 Streets & Spaces P. 14 6.2 Views P. 17 6.3 Landmark Buildings P. 21 7. CHARACTER ANALYSIS 7.1 Overview & Character Areas P. 24 7.1.1 Character Area 1: Pembroke Road P. 27 7.1.2 Character Area 2: The Zoo & College P. 31 7.1.3 Character Area 3: The Promenade P. 34 7.1.4 Character Area 4: Clifton Park P. 37 7.1.5 Character Area 5: Victoria Square & Queens Road P. 41 7.1.6 Character Area 6: Clifton Green P. 44 7.1.7 Character Area 7: Clifton Wood Slopes P. 48 7.1.8 Character Area 8: Clifton Spa Terraces P. 50 7.1.9 Character Area 9: Hotwells P. 55 7.2 Architectural Details P. 58 7.3 Townscape Details P. 62 7.4 Materials P. 67 7.5 Building Types P. 68 7.9 Landscape & Trees P. 70 8. TYPICAL LAND USE & SUMMARY OF ISSUES 8.1 Overview P. 73 8.2 Residential P. 73 8.3 Institutions & Churches P. 74 8.4 Open Spaces & Community Gardens P.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchment Partnerships in Operation
    Catchment Partnerships in Operation 100 80 53 81 89 25 90 17 74 26 67 33 71 39 16 99 28 99 56 95 2 3 20 30 37 18 42 42 85 29 79 79 15 43 91 96 21 83 38 50 61 69 51 51 59 92 62 6 73 97 45 55 75 7 88 24 98 8 82 60 10 84 12 9 57 87 77 35 66 66 78 40 5 32 78 49 35 14 34 49 41 70 94 44 27 76 58 63 1 48 23 4 13 22 19 46 72 31 47 64 93 Legend Category No group yet established 0 20 40 80 Kilometres GSurobu cpa/gtcrhomupesn wt orking at sub catchment scale WGrhooulpe wcaotrckhinmge antt whole catchment scale © Crown Copyright and database right 2013. Ordnance Survey licence number 100024198. Map produced October 2013 © Copyright Environment Agency and database right 2013. Key to Management Catchment ID Catchment Sub/whole Joint ID Management Catchment partnership catchment Sub catchment name RBD Category Host Organisation (s) 1 Adur & Ouse Yes Whole South East England Yes Ouse and Adur Rivers Trust, Environment Agency 2 Aire and Calder Yes Whole Humber England No The Aire Rivers Trust 3 Alt/Crossens Yes Whole North West England No Healthy Waterways Trust 4 Arun & Western Streams Yes Whole South East England No Arun and Rother Rivers Trust 5 Bristol Avon & North Somerset Streams Yes Whole Severn England Yes Avon Wildlife Trust, Avon Frome Partnership 6 Broadland Rivers Yes Whole Anglian England No Norfolk Rivers Trust 7 Cam and Ely Ouse (including South Level) Yes Whole Anglian England Yes The Rivers Trust, Anglian Water Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife 8 Cherwell Yes Whole Thames England No Trust 9 Colne Yes Whole Thames England
    [Show full text]
  • Part of Claverton Down SNCI) (Part of Rush Hill & Eastover Coppice SNCI) Areas Adjacent to Kennet and Avon Canal Ash Brake
    SNCI Site Name (part of Claverton Down SNCI) (part of Rush Hill & Eastover Coppice SNCI) Areas adjacent to Kennet and Avon Canal Ash Brake Ashcombe Wood Atgrove Wood and stream Avoncliff Wood Ayford Farm Babylon Brook Bannerdown, and Shockerwick and Woodleaze Woods Bath University (part) (part of Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI) Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI (part of ) Bathampton Oxbow Bathford Brook and adjacent land Bathwick Slopes (part of) (part of Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI) Bathwick Wood (part of Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI) Beach Wood Complex Beach Wood complex Beacon Hill Beechen Cliff Belle Vue Tip Bellflower Hill Bengrove Wood and adjacent fields Bitham's Wood and meadows Bitton to Bath railway track Bladdock Gutter Blagdon Lake SSSI and adjacent land Bowlditch Quarry SSSI Brake Wood Breach Hill Common Breach Wood and adjacent land Broad Mead field Broad Wood Broadhill Copse Bromley Farm mine Brown's Folly - Warleigh complex Buckley Wood, Lady Wood, and adjacent fields Burledge Common and adjacent fields Burnett Brook and woods By Brook and associated marginal habitats Cam Brook and adjacent land Cam Brook disused railway Camerton New Pit Tip Camerton Wood Carrs Wood Castle Wood Catsley Wood Charlcombe Lane field Charlcombe Valley Charlton Bottom and Queen Charlton Watercourse Charmy Down Chelscombe and Lansdown Woods SNCI Chew Valley Lake SSSI and adjacent land Chewstoke Brook Clandown Bottom Claverton Wood & Vineyard Bottoms Clay Pits Woods Cleaves Wood, adjacent woodland and fields Cleveland Walk and
    [Show full text]
  • II. Hannah More: Concise Biography
    DISSERTATION Titel der Dissertation HANNAH MORE: MORALIZING THE BRITISH NATION Verfasserin Mag. phil. Helga-Maria Kopecky angestrebter akademischer Grad Doktorin der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) Wien, 2014 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 092 343 Dissertationsgebiet lt. Studienblatt: Anglistik und Amerikanistik Betreut von: o. Univ. Prof. Dr. Margarete Rubik 2 For Gerald ! 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my great appreciation to those who assisted me in various ways in this project: to my first supervisor, o. Professor Dr. Margarete Rubik, for guiding me patiently and with never ending encouragement and friendliness through a difficult matter with her expertise; to my second supervisor, ao. Professor Dr. Franz Wöhrer, for his valuable feedback; to the English and American Studies Library as well as the Inter-loan Department of the Library of the University of Vienna; the National Library of Australia; and last, but certainly not least, to my family. It was their much appreciated willingness to accept an absent wife, mother and grandmother over a long period, which ultimately made this work at all possible. Thank you so much! 4 Of all the principles that can operate upon the human mind, the most powerful is – Religion. John Bowles 5 Table of Contents page I. Introduction General remarks ……………………………………………………. 9 Research materials ………………………………………………... 12 Aims of this thesis ………………………………………………… 19 Arrangement of individual chapters ...…………………………... 22 II. Hannah More: Concise Biography Early Years in Bristol ……………………………………………….. 24 The London Experience and the Bluestockings ………………... 26 Return to Bristol and New Humanitarian Interests ................... 32 The Abolitionist .......................................................................... 34 Reforming the Higher Ranks ..................................................... 36 The Tribute to Patriotism ........................................................... 40 Teaching the Poor: Schools for the Mendips ............................
    [Show full text]
  • Recreation 2020-21
    Conservation access and recreation 2020-21 wessexwater.co.uk Contents About Wessex Water 1 Our commitment 2 Our duties 2 Our land 3 Delivering our duties 3 Conservation land management 4 A catchment-based approach 10 Engineering and sustainable delivery 12 Eel improvements 13 Invasive non-native species 14 Access and recreation 15 Fishing 17 Partners Programme 18 Water Force 21 Photo: Henley Spiers Henley Photo: Beaver dam – see 'Nature’s engineers' page 7 About Wessex Water Wessex Water is one of 10 regional water and sewerage companies in England and About 80% of the water we supply comes from groundwater sources in Wiltshire Wales. We provide sewerage services to an area of the south west of England that and Dorset. The remaining 20% comes from surface water reservoirs which are includes Dorset, Somerset, Bristol, most of Wiltshire, and parts of Gloucestershire, filled by rainfall and runoff from the catchment. We work in partnership with Hampshire and Devon. Within our region, Bristol Water, Bournemouth Water and organisations and individuals across our region to protect and restore the water Cholderton and District Water Company also supply customers with water. environment as a part of the catchment based approach (CaBA). We work with all the catchment partnerships in the region and host two catchment partnerships, Bristol What area does Wessex Water cover? Avon and Poole Harbour, and co-host the Stour catchment initiative with the Dorset Wildlife Trust. our region our catchments Stroud 8 Cotswold South Gloucestershire Bristol Wessex
    [Show full text]
  • BRSUG Number Mineral Name Hey Index Group Hey No
    BRSUG Number Mineral name Hey Index Group Hey No. Chem. Country Locality Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-37 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Basset Mines, nr. Redruth, Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-151 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Phoenix mine, Cheese Wring, Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-280 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 County Bridge Quarry, Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and South Caradon Mine, 4 miles N of Liskeard, B-319 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-394 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 ? Cornwall? Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-395 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-539 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] North America, U.S.A Houghton, Michigan Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-540 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] North America, U.S.A Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan, Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-541 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] North America, U.S.A Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan, Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu,
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118)
    NELMS target statement for Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118) Your application is scored and a decision made on the points awarded. Both top priorities and lower priorities score points but you should select at least one top priority. Scoring is carried out by... Choosing priorities To apply you should choose at least one of the top priorities, and you can choose lower priorities - this may help with your application. Top priorities Priority group Priority type Biodiversity Priority habitats Priority species Water Water quality Flood and coastal risk management Historic environment Designated historic and archaeological features Undesignated historic and archaeological features of high significance Woodland priorities Woodland management Woodland planting Landscape Climate Change Multiple environmental benefits Lower priorities Priority group Priority type Lower priorities Water quality Archaeological and historic features Woodland Biodiversity - top priorities Priority habitats You should carry out land management practices and capital works that maintains, restores and creates priority habitats. Maintain priority habitat such as: • Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional orchard • Lowland dry acid grassland Wood Pasture and Parkland Restore priority habitats (especially proposals which make existing sites bigger or help join up habitat networks) such as: ● Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional
    [Show full text]
  • The Sandford Gulf and Other Lost Caves of Sandford Hill
    THE SANDFORD GULF AND OTHER LOST CAVES OF SANDFORD HILL By R. M. Taviner During the 18 th century, miners’ working on the western outliers of the Mendip Hills intercepted several small but notable cave systems, including the Banwell caves, Loxton Cavern and Hutton Cavern. Most were subsequently lost, although several have recently been rediscovered by cave explorers, often by following clues provided by the antiquarians who dutifully recorded them. Not all of these caverns have been rediscovered however, including three well documented sites on Sandford Hill. The first, Elephant Cave - which contained the skeleton of a full sized elephant - was recorded in 1770, while the better documented Sandford Bone Fissure was excavated by William Beard, beginning in 1837. Both of these sites are important, but it is the third lost cave, the legendary Sandford Gulf, that most exercises the minds of cavers. It is hoped that this article will help to bring some clarity to proceedings, and through a process of elimination, propose a precise location for the missing Gulf - a very good place to start digging! Sandford Hill from the North-West Map data ©2016 Google ELEPHANT CAVE The full details of this mysterious cave were included in a letter dated 30 th January 1770, sent by William Jeffries of Wrington to The Rev. Alexander Catcott, clergyman, geologist and author of A Treatise on the Deluge. ‘Where these Bones were found in almost the highest part of the Hill on the north Side: they lay in an East and West Direction four fathom deep in a loose Strata composed mostly of small Fragments of limestone, Sand etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Timetables
    Bus Timetables To Bristol, 672 service, Monday to Saturday Time leaving Bishop Sutton, Post Office 0720 0957 Time arriving at Bristol, Union Street 0826 1059 From Bristol, 672 service, Monday to Saturday Time leaving Bristol, Union Street 1405 1715 Time arriving at Bishop Sutton 1510 1824 To & From Tesco & Midsomer Norton, 754 service, Mondays only Time leaving Bishop Sutton 0915 Time leaving Midsomer Norton 1236 Time arriving at & leaving Tesco 1024 Time arriving at & leaving at Tesco 1244 Time arriving at Midsomer Norton 1030 Time arriving at Bishop Sutton 1350 To & From Weston-Super-Mare & Wells*, 134 service, Tuesdays only Time leaving Bishop Sutton, Time leaving Weston-s-Mare, 0933 1300 opposite Post Office Regent Street Time Arriving at Weston-s-Mare 1039 Time Arriving at Bishop Sutton 1359 *Change at Blagdon for Wells on the 683 service, which leaves Wells at 1310 & reaches Blagdon at 1345 to change back to the 134 service to Bishop Sutton. Through fares are available. To & From Bath, 7521 service, Wednesdays only Time leaving Bishop Sutton, Woodcroft 0924 Time leaving Bath, Grand Parade 1345 Time arriving at Bath, Grand Parade 1015 Time arriving at Bishop Sutton 1431 To & From Congresbury & Nailsea, 128 service, Thursdays only Time leaving Bishop Sutton, Opp PO 0909 Time leaving Nailsea, Link Road 1210 Time arriving at & leaving Congresbury 0944 Time arriving at & leaving Congresbury 1245 Time arriving at Nailsea 1015 Time arriving at Bishop Sutton 1319 To & From Keynsham, 640 service, Fridays only Time leaving Bishop Sutton, Post Office 0920 Time leaving Keynsham, Ashton Way 1240 Time arriving at Keynsham, Ashton Way 1015 Time arriving at Bishop Sutton 1333 All buses pickup & drop-off from the bus stop outside the village shop / post office, except for the 7521 which is timetabled to pick up from the Woodcroft stop, which is roughly 100 metres after The Old Pit garage and on that side of the road, at the end of the village, however they often stop outside the shop as well.
    [Show full text]
  • North Somerset & Mendip Bats SAC Citation
    EC Directive 92/43 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora Citation for Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Name: North Somerset and Mendip Bats Unitary Authority/County: Bath and North East Somerset, North Somerset, Somerset SAC status: Designated on 1 April 2005 Grid reference: ST480544 SAC EU code: UK0030052 Area (ha): 561.19 Component SSSI: Banwell Caves SSSI, Banwell Ochre Caves SSSI, Brockley Hall Stables SSSI, Compton Martin Ochre Mine SSSI, King’s Wood and Urchin Wood SSSI, The Cheddar Complex SSSI, Wookey Hole SSSI Site description: The Cheddar complex and Wookey Hole areas support a wide range of habitats which provide feeding grounds for bats. These include semi-natural dry grasslands of which the principal community present is sheep’s-fescue – meadow oat-grass (Festuca ovina – Helictotrichon pratense) grassland which occurs on rock ledges and on steep slopes with shallow limestone soil, especially in the dry valleys and gorges and on the south-facing scarp of the Mendips. King’s Wood and Urchin Wood have developed over limestone which outcrops in parts of the site and forms a steep scarp to the south-east. There is mostly oak Quercus robur and ash Fraxinus excelsior woodland, though some areas are dominated by small-leaved lime Tilia cordata with both maiden and coppice trees. Other canopy trees include yew Taxus baccata, cherry Prunus avium and wild service tree Sorbus torminalis. There is a rich ground flora including many ferns and mosses. The limestone caves and mines of the Mendips and the north Somerset hills provide a range of important breeding and hibernation sites for lesser horseshoe bat Rhinolophus hipposideros and greater horseshoe bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum.
    [Show full text]
  • Area 1: Thrubwell Farm Plateau
    Area 1: Thrubwell Farm Plateau Summary of Landscape Character • Clipped hedges which are often ‘gappy’ and supplemented by sheep netting • Late 18th and early 19th century rectilinear field layout at north of area • Occasional groups of trees • Geologically complex • Well drained soils • Flat or very gently undulating plateau • A disused quarry • Parkland at Butcombe Court straddling the western boundary • Minor roads set out on a grid pattern • Settlement within the area consists of isolated farms and houses For detailed Character Area map see Appendix 3 23 Context Bristol airport on the plateau outside the area to the west. Introduction Land-uses 7.1.1 The character area consists of a little over 1sq 7.1.6 The land is mainly under pasture and is also km of high plateau to the far west of the area. The plateau used for silage making. There is some arable land towards extends beyond the Bath and North East Somerset boundary the north of the area. Part of Butcombe Court parkland into North Somerset and includes Felton Hill to the north falls within the area to the west of Thrubwell Lane. and Bristol airport to the west. The southern boundary is marked by the top of the scarp adjoining the undulating Fields, Boundaries and Trees and generally lower lying Chew Valley to the south. 7.1.7 Fields are enclosed by hedges that are generally Geology, Soils and Drainage trimmed and often contain few trees. Tall untrimmed hedges are less common. Hedges are typically ‘gappy’ and of low 7.1.2 Geologically the area is complex though on the species diversity and are often supplemented with sheep- ground this is not immediately apparent.
    [Show full text]