DOCSLIB.ORG

Mulching and Tillage Effects on GHG Emissions and Properties of an Alfisol In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mulching and Tillage Effects on GHG Emissions and Properties of an Alfisol In Mulching and tillage effects on GHG emissions and properties of an Alfisol in Central Ohio THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Merrie Ann Varughese Environmental Science Graduate Program The Ohio State University 2011 Master's Examination Committee: Dr. Rattan Lal, Advisor Dr. Craig B. Davis, committee member Dr. Martin J. Shipitalo, committee member © Copyright by Merrie Ann Varughese 2011 All Rights Reserved Abstract No-tillage (NT) management in conjunction with crop residue retention on soil has been promoted as a practice capable of enhancing the soil quality as well as offsetting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions because of its ability to sequester carbon in soils. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the long term effects of application wheat (Triticum aestivum) residue mulch under NT and conventional tillage (CT) on GHG emissions, soil physical and chemical properties in an ongoing experiment in Central Ohio. Treatments included three rates of mulch at 0 Mg ha-1 yr-1 (M0), 8 Mg ha-1 yr-1 (M8) and 16 Mg ha-1 yr-1 (M16) without crop cultivation. All treatments were replicated thrice and laid out according to a completely randomized design. The data presented showed that application of straw mulch under NT can reduce GHG emissions -2 compared to CT. The average diurnal CO2 fluxes were lower under NT (8.58g CO2-C m -1 -2 -1 d ) compared to CT (9.69g CO2-C m d ). The effects of plowing on N2O flux, although -2 -1 not significant, indicated a trend of higher N2O fluxes under NT (0.27 mg m d ) than CT (0.21 mg m-2 d-1). Similarly, there was no definite trend among tillage treatments with regards to CH4 flux. However, NT was more of a sink for CH4 while CT treatments were sources. CO2 and N2O fluxes were significantly affected by mulch treatments, but mulching did not significantly affect CH4 flux. Furthermore, the application of mulch ii directly influences chemical and physical properties of the soil. The current study shows that the application of mulch conserves soil moisture, reduces bulk density, moderates soil temperature, reduces soil salinity and enhances soil aggregation. Results suggest that mulching in conjunction with NT has positive effects on temperate agricultural soils, yet further research needs to be conducted to provide additional insight on the over-all impact and interactions between management regimes and GHG emissions, especially in relation to soil properties and climate factors. iii Dedication This document is dedicated to my beloved, George Oommen, and my family. iv Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my most sincere gratitude to my advisor Prof. Rattan Lal for giving me the opportunity to join his team. I thank him for his patience, continuous encouragement, guidance and funding to make my Masters experience productive and stimulating. I would also like to thank other members of my committee, Prof. Craig Davis and Dr. Martin Shipitalo for their insightful comments and guidance. I express my whole hearted thanks to the Carbon Management and Sequestration Centre group for their constructive criticism and excellent advice during the preparation of this I owe my gratitude to Dr. Meherban Kahlon, Senior Soil Scientist, Department of Soils, PAU, Ludhiana, India. for helping me with soil sampling and lab experiments. I am especially grateful to Basant Rimal for his constant support with lab experiments and gas sample analysis. I would also like to thank Matthew Yin of OSU‘s Statistical Consulting Service (SCS) for helping with the statistical analysis of my data. Most importantly, I would like to thank my family and my friends for all their love and support. I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my beloved, George Oommen, for always offering me a helping hand during my sampling process and for being a constant source of encouragement through-out my research and thesis work. v Vita 2001-2005 ......................................................Vidyodaya School (Higher Secondary Education) 2005-2009 ......................................................B.E. Biotechnology, Vellore Institute of Technology University Fields of Study Major Field: Environmental Science vi Table of Contents Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………….................ii Dedication………………………………………………………………………………………………...iv Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………………v Vita….……………………………………………………………………………………………………...vi List of Tables………………………………………………………………………………………….....ix List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………………………….x Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 GHG concentrations in the atmosphere: ............................................................. 3 1.2 Factors affecting GHG emissions from agricultural soils: .................................. 6 1.2.1 Soil physical properties: ............................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Soil chemical properties:.............................................................................. 7 1.2.3 Tillage systems............................................................................................. 8 1.2.3.1 CO2 emissions ........................................................................................ 10 1.2.3.2 CH4 emissions ........................................................................................ 10 1.2.3.3 N2O emissions ........................................................................................ 11 1.2.4 Crop residue management.......................................................................... 12 1.2.4.1 Mulch amendments ................................................................................ 13 References: ........................................................................................................ 16 Chapter 2: Mulching and tillage effects on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions ......... 25 2.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................. 25 2.2 Introduction: ...................................................................................................... 26 2.3 Materials and methods: ..................................................................................... 30 2.3.1 Field site and experimental design:............................................................ 30 2.3.2 Monitoring CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes ....................................................... 31 2.3.3 Analysis of gas samples ............................................................................. 32 2.3.4 Data analysis .............................................................................................. 33 vii 2.4 Results and discussion ....................................................................................... 34 2.4.1 Diurnal CO2 fluxes ..................................................................................... 34 2.4.2 Diurnal N2O fluxes .................................................................................... 41 2.4.3 Diurnal CH4 fluxes ..................................................................................... 45 2.5 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 49 References ......................................................................................................... 51 Chapter 3: Mulching and tillage effects on soil physical and chemical properties ..... 57 3.1 Abstract ............................................................................................................. 57 3.2 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 58 3.3 Materials and method: ....................................................................................... 62 3.3.1 Field site and experimental design:............................................................ 62 3.3.2 Determination of soil physical properties: ................................................. 63 3.3.3 Determination of chemical properties ........................................................ 64 3.3.4 Statistical analysis ...................................................................................... 65 3.4 Results and discussion:...................................................................................... 65 3.4.1 Soil physical parameters ............................................................................ 65 3.4.1.1 Soil bulk density under different mulch and tillage treatments ............. 65 3.4.1.2 Soil moisture under different mulch and tillage treatments ................... 68 3.4.1.3 Soil temperature under different mulch and tillage treatments .............. 70 3.4.2 Soil chemical parameters ........................................................................... 73 3.4.2.1 Soil pH under different mulch and tillage treatments ............................ 73 3.4.2.2 Soil EC under different mulch and tillage treatments ............................ 73 3.4.2.3 Soil macro and micro-aggregate C and N concentration under different mulch and tillage treatments ................................................................................. 75 3.5 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 78 References
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soils Section
    Soils Section 2003 Florida Envirothon Study Sections Soil Key Points SOIL KEY POINTS • Recognize soil as an important dynamic resource. • Describe basic soil properties and soil formation factors. • Understand soil drainage classes and know how wetlands are defined. • Determine basic soil properties and limitations, such as mottling and permeability by observing a soil pit or soil profile. • Identify types of soil erosion and discuss methods for reducing erosion. • Use soil information, including a soil survey, in land use planning discussions. • Discuss how soil is a factor in, or is impacted by, nonpoint and point source pollution. Florida’s State Soil Florida has the largest total acreage of sandy, siliceous, hyperthermic Aeric Haplaquods in the nation. This is commonly called Myakka fine sand. It does not occur anywhere else in the United States. There are more than 1.5 million acres of Myakka fine sand in Florida. On May 22, 1989, Governor Bob Martinez signed Senate Bill 525 into law making Myakka fine sand Florida’s official state soil. iii Florida Envirothon Study Packet — Soils Section iv Contents CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1 WHAT IS SOIL AND HOW IS SOIL FORMED? .....................................................................3 SOIL CHARACTERISTICS..........................................................................................................7 Texture......................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphorus Adsorption of Some Brazilian Soils in Relations to Selected Soil Properties
    Open Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 5, 101-109 Published Online May 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojss http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2015.55010 Phosphorus Adsorption of Some Brazilian Soils in Relations to Selected Soil Properties Valdinar Ferreira Melo1*, Sandra Cátia Pereira Uchôa1, Zachary N. Senwo2*, Ronilson José Pedroso Amorim3 1Department of Soil and Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Brazil 2Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences, Alabama A&M University, Huntsville, USA 3Agronomy, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Brazil Email: *[email protected], *[email protected] Received 3 April 2015; accepted 17 May 2015; published 20 May 2015 Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract A major nutritional problem to crops grown in highly weathered Brazilian soils is phosphorus (P) deficiencies linked to their low availability and the capacity of the soils to fix P in insoluble forms. Our studies examined factors that might influence P behavior in soils of the Amazon region. This study was conducted to evaluate the maximum phosphate adsorption capacity (MPAC) of the soils developed from mafic rocks (diabase), their parent materials and other factors resulting in the formation of eutrophic soils having A chernozemic horizon associated with Red Nitosols (Alfisol) and Red Latosols (Oxisol) of the Amazonian environment. The MPAC was determined in triplicates as a function of the remnant P values. The different concentrations used to determine the MPAC allowed maximum adsorption values to be reached for all soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic Horizons
    Exam III Wednesday, November 7th Study Guide Posted Tomorrow Review Session in Class on Monday the 4th Soil Taxonomy and Classification Diagnostic Horizons Epipedons Subsurface Mollic Albic Umbric Kandic Ochric Histic Argillic Melanic Spodic Plaggen Anthropic Oxic 1 Surface Horizons: Mollic- thick, dark colored, high %B.S., structure Umbric – same, but lower B.S. Ochric – pale, low O.M., thin Histic – High O.M., thick, wet, dark Sub-Surface Horizons: Argillic – illuvial accum. of clay (high activity) Kandic – accum. of clay (low activity) Spodic – Illuvial O.M. accumulation (Al and/or Fe) Oxic – highly weathered, kaolinite, Fe and Al oxides Albic – light colored, elluvial, low reactivity Elluviation and Illuviation Elluviation (E horizon) Organic matter Clays A A E E Bh horizon Bt horizon Bh Bt Spodic horizon Argillic horizon 2 Soil Taxonomy Diagnostic Epipedons Diagnostic Subsurface horizons Moisture Regimes Temperature Regimes Age Texture Depth Soil Taxonomy Soil forming processes, presence or Order Absence of major diagnostic horizons 12 Similar genesis Suborder 63 Grasslands – thick, dark Great group 250 epipedons High %B.S. Sub group 1400 Family 8000 Series 19,000 Soil Orders Entisols Histosols Inceptisols Andisols Gelisols Alfisols Mollisols Ultisols Spodosols Aridisols Vertisols Oxisols 3 Soil Orders Entisol Ent- Recent Histosol Hist- Histic (organic) Inceptisol Incept- Inception Alfisol Alf- Nonsense Ultisol Ult- Ultimate Spodosol Spod- Spodos (wood ash) Mollisol Moll- Mollis (soft) Oxisol Ox- oxide Andisol And- Ando (black) Gelisol
    [Show full text]
  • Geology As a Georegional Influence on Quercus Fagaceae Distribution
    GEOLOGY AS A GEOREGIONAL INFLUENCE ON Quercus FAGACEAE DISTRIBUTION IN DENTON AND COKE COUNTIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS AND CHOCTAW COUNTY OF SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA, USING GIS AS AN ANALYTICAL TOOL George F. Maxey, B.S., M.S. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2007 APPROVED: C. Reid Ferring, Major Professor Miguel Avevedo, Committee Member Kenneth Dickson, Committee Member Donald Lyons, Committee Member Paul Hudak, Committee Member and Chair of the Department of Geography Sandra L. Terrell, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Maxey, George F. Geology as a Georegional Influence on Quercus Fagaceae Distribution in Denton and Coke Counties of Central and North Central Texas and Choctaw County of Southeastern Oklahoma, Using GIS as an Analytical Tool. Doctor of Philosophy (Environmental Science), December 2007, 198 pp., 30 figures, 24 tables, references, 57 titles. This study elucidates the underlying relationships for the distribution of oak landcover on bedrock and soil orders in two counties in Texas and one in Oklahoma. ESRI’s ArcGis and ArcMap was used to create surface maps for Denton and Coke Counties, Texas and Choctaw County, Oklahoma. Attribute tables generated in GIS were exported into a spreadsheet software program and frequency tables were created for every formation and soil order in the tri-county research area. The results were both a visual and numeric distribution of oaks in the transition area between the eastern hardwood forests and the Great Plains. Oak distributions are changing on this transition area of the South Central Plains.
    [Show full text]
  • Perennial Grain Crop Roots and Nitrogen Management Shape Soil Food Webs T and Soil Carbon Dynamics ∗ Christine D
    Soil Biology and Biochemistry 137 (2019) 107573 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Soil Biology and Biochemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/soilbio Perennial grain crop roots and nitrogen management shape soil food webs T and soil carbon dynamics ∗ Christine D. Sprungera, , Steven W. Culmana, Ariane L. Peraltab, S. Tianna DuPontc, Jay T. Lennond, Sieglinde S. Snappe a School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA b Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA c Tree Fruit Research and Extension, Washington State University, Wenatchee, WA, 98801, USA d Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA e Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Perennial grain crops may confer greater ecosystem services relative to annual row crop systems due to their Organic matter extensive roots systems and year-round ground cover. However, less is known about the extent to which per- Root biomass ennial grain crops affect food web dynamics and soil carbon (C) cycling over time. Furthermore, manyme- Nematodes chanistic questions remain regarding the influence of root quantity and quality on soil biological communities Bacteria and C cycling function. In this study, we quantified root biomass and quality, bacterial and nematode community Soil food webs structure, and labile soil C pools of perennial intermediate wheatgrass [Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Buckworth and Dewey] and annual winter wheat (Triticum aes L.) across three nitrogen (N) management systems (Organic, Low inorganic N, High inorganic N). After 4 years, the perennial grain crop had significantly greater root quantity and permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) relative to annual wheat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Soil Orders of Texas
    The Soil Orders of Texas The system for classifying soils, Soil Taxonomy, is used worldwide. The highest level of Soil Taxonomy is the Soil Order. There are 12 recognized soil orders in the world. Of these, the state of Texas has 9. There are more than 1,300 soil series in Texas, and each series is classified in one of these 9 soil orders. The Dominant Soil Orders map represents the general distribution of 7 of the 9 soil orders in Texas. The 7 soil orders, Alfisols, Aridisols, Entisols, Inceptisols, Mollisols, Ultisols, and Vertisols, are mapped extensively in the state. The other 2 soil orders, Histosols and Spodosols, which are mapped in the southeastern part of the state, are not shown on the map because they cover relatively small areas. The soil orders not found in Texas are Andisols (volcanic soils), Gelisols (frozen soils), and Oxisols (highly weathered tropical soils). Alfisols Inceptisols The Duval series is an example of an Alfisol. Alfisols have a subsurface The Weswood series is an example of an Inceptisol. Inceptisols are soils with accumulation of clay and have greater than or equal to 35 percent base weakly developed subsurface horizons. These soils may be shallow to saturation. Duval soils occur in the Northern and Western Rio Grande Plain on bedrock, occur on steeply sloping land, or they may be very deep soils in nearly level to gently sloping uplands. areas subject to intermittent flooding. Weswood soils occur along the flood plains of the Brazos and Colorado Rivers in central Texas. Aridisols Mollisols The Upton series is an example of an Aridisol.
    [Show full text]
  • Harnessing the Benefits of Soil Biology in Conservation Agriculture Vadakattu Gupta, Margaret Roper and John Thompson
    Chapter 15 Harnessing the benefits of soil biology in conservation agriculture Vadakattu Gupta, Margaret Roper and John Thompson Soil biology and ecology in conservation agriculture “Soil, the 1 m skin of the earth, sustains all life forms in the terrestrial ecosystem and is vital to the very existence and substance of human life” (Dick 2018). Soils function as biological entities due to the microbial communities that exist within them. It is estimated that in 1 kg of soil, there are more than 1 billion bacteria and >2 km of fungal hyphae. More than 95% of soil microbial species are non- culturable, but metagenomic analysis of nucleic acids is transforming our ability to understand the breadth and diversity of soil microbial communities and their functional capabilities. Soil microbial communities are dependent for the most part on food sources, water and oxygen. In Australian soils, which are low in soil organic matter, spatial heterogeneity results in more concentrated communities associated with microsites such as plant roots (rhizosphere) and decomposing residues (detritusphere) which support approximately 60% of all microbial life in surface soils. In the rhizosphere, carbon (C) and other nutrients and water are supplied by rhizodeposition with above- and below-ground crop residues being major sources of C inputs in agricultural soils. Microbial communities in the rhizosphere generally originate from the general soil but spatial isolation and minimal food sources in the soil limit their proliferation and activities. In the rhizosphere, interactions among microorganisms and plants are generally mutualistic. Apart from food and nutrients supplied by plants, microorganisms benefit from interactions with each other and provide benefits to the plant by transforming nutrients to available forms or by competing with or suppressing plant pathogens.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Biochar on Plant Productivity and Soil Properties Under a Maize Soybean Rotation on an Alfisol in Central Ohio DISSERT
    Impact of biochar on plant productivity and soil properties under a maize soybean rotation on an Alfisol in Central Ohio DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ryan Darrell Hottle Graduate Program in Environmental Science The Ohio State University 2013 Dissertation Committee: Rattan Lal, advisor Jay Martin Peter Curtis Berry Lyons Copyrighted by Ryan Darrell Hottle 2013 ABSTRACT Here we investigate the application of biochar to a maize (Zea mays)-soybeans (Glycine max L.) rotation in the U.S. Midwest in order to assess the agronomic impacts and changes to soil physical, chemical and biological properties. Biochar is a carbon- rich co-product of thermal degradation of biomass precursor material, a process called ―pyrolysis,‖ intended for the use as a soil amendment as opposed to combusted for heat or energy. Biochar could offer a sustainable means of generating energy, sequestering atmospheric CO2 (thereby mitigating climate change), and increasing agronomic productivity of crops through soil quality enhancement. At a global scale biochar could sequester >1 Pg C yr-1, thereby substantially helping to mitigate climate change. At present, the majority of long-term field trials using biochar as a soil amendemenMg have focused on highly weathered and degraded soils mainly in the tropics and subtropics. Very little long-term field trials have been conducted on agroecosystems in temperate parts of the world. Our research aimed to fill this void, by conducting a 4- year field experiment (2010-2013) with oak-derived biochar from a slow pyrolysis process at ~425⁰C at three rates (0 Mg ha-1, 5 Mg ha-1 and 25 Mg ha-1) with 100% and ii 50% of nitrogen fertilizer (146 kg ha-1 N and 72 kg ha-1 N, respectively) on a maize - soybean rotation on an Ohio alfisol soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrological Behaviour of Alfisols and Vertisols
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ICRISAT Open Access Repository Hydrological behavior of Alfisols and Vertisols in the semi- arid zone: Implications for soil and water management P. Pathak, , R. Sudi, S.P. Wani, K.L. Sahrawat International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India Agricultural Water Management Volume 118, February 2013, Pages 12–21 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.11.012 This is author version post print archived in the official Institutional Repository of ICRISAT www.icrisat.org Hydrological behaviour of Alfisols and Vertisols in the Semi-arid zone: Implications for soil and water management Prabhakar Pathak*, R Sudi and Suhas P Wani International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), P.O. Patanchru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract An understanding of hydrological behavior of soils is a prerequisite for developing appropriate soil and water management practices. Such information for the Alfisols and Vertisols, the two major soils * Corresponding author: Tel.: +91-40-30713337; fax: +91-40-30713074/30713075 E-mail address: [email protected] (P.Pathak) 1 in the semi and tropics (SAT), is scanty especially from a long-term perspective. Long-term hydrological studies were conducted on small agricultural watersheds from 1976 to 2008 at the ICRISAT Center, Patancheru, India. We discuss the behavior of Alfisols and Vertisols based on long- term results on runoff volume, peak runoff rate, number of runoff events, soil loss, sediment concentration and deep drainage loss under different rainfall, crop cover and soil conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Paleothermometer for Forest Paleosols and Its Implications for Cenozoic Climate
    A new paleothermometer for forest paleosols and its implications for Cenozoic climate Timothy M. Gallagher and Nathan D. Sheldon Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, 2534 CC Little, 1100 N. University Ave, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA ABSTRACT Climate is a primary control on the chemical composition of paleosols, making them a potentially extensive archive applicable to problems ranging from paleoclimate reconstruction to paleoaltimetry. However, the development of an effective, widely-applicable paleosol temperature proxy has remained elusive. This is attributable to the fact that various soil orders behave differently due to their respective physical and chemical properties. Therefore, by focusing on an individual order or a subset of the twelve soil orders whose members exhibit similar process behavior, a better constrained paleothermometer can be constructed. Soil chemistry data were compiled for 158 modern soils in order to derive a new paleosol paleothermometry relationship between mean annual temperature and a paleosol weathering index (PWI) that is based on the relative loss of major cations (Na, Mg, K, Ca) from soil B horizons. The new paleothermometer can be applied to clay-rich paleosols that originally formed under forest vegetation, including Inceptisols, Alfisols, and Ultisols, and halves the uncertainty relative to previous approaches. A case study using Cenozoic paleosols from Oregon shows that paleotemperatures produced with this new proxy compare favorably with paleobotanical temperature estimates. Global climatic events are also evident in the Oregon paleosol record, 1 of 28 including a 2.8 °C drop across the Eocene-Oligocene transition comparable to marine records, and a Neogene peak temperature during the Mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum.
    [Show full text]
  • Arenosols (Ar)
    ARENOSOLS (AR) The Reference Soil Group of the Arenosols consists of sandy soils, both soils developed in residual sands, in situ after weathering of old, usually quartz-rich soil material or rock, and soils developed in recently deposited sands as occur in deserts and beach lands. Correlated soils in other classification sys- tems include Psamments, Psammaquents of the USDA Soil Taxonomy. Deep sandy soils with an argic or a spodic horizon within 200 cm from the surface are accommodated as ‘Grossarenic’ subgroups within the Alfisol, Ultisol and Spodosol orders. In the French classification system (CPCS, 1967), Areno- sols correlate with taxa within the “Classe des sols minéraux bruts” and the “Classe des sols peu évolués”. Other international soil names are to indicate Arenosols are ‘siliceous, earthy and calcareous sands’ and various ‘podsolic soils’ (Australia), ‘red and yellow sands’ (Brazil) and the Arenosols of the FAO Soil Map of the World. Definition of Arenosols Soils 1 having a texture which is loamy sand or coarser either to a depth of at least 100 cm from the soil surface, or to a plinthic, petroplinthic or salic horizon between 50 and 100 cm from the soil sur- face; and 2 having less than 35 percent (by volume) of rock fragments or other coarse fragments within 100 cm of the soil surface; and 3 having no diagnostic horizons other than an ochric, yermic or albic horizon, or a plinthic, petro-plinthic or salic horizon below 50 cm from the soil surface. Common soil units: Gelic, Hyposalic, Gleyic, Hyperalbic, Plinthic, Hypoferralic, Hypoluvic, Tephric, Gypsiric, Calcaric, Albic, Lamellic, Fragic, Yermic, Aridic, Protic, Dystric, Eutric, Rubic, Haplic.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Learning Objectives
    Chapter 3 Learning Objectives Chapter 3 • Describe the current USDA soil classification system • List the six categories of classification in Soil Soil Taxonomy Taxonomy • Describe the major characteristics, the general degree of weathering and soil development, and the worldwide distribution and uses of the 12 soil orders • List key features of a particular soil and its environment given the soil name (e.g., Hapludalf) Diagnostic Subsurface Horizons Diagnostic Subsurface Horizons • 18 of them – Albic: light-colored elluvial horizon (leached) – Cambic: weakly developed horizon, some color • Six we will focus on (and the assoc. genetic change label): – Spodic: illuvial horizon with accumulations of O.M. – Argillic: subsurface accumulations of silicate clays – Albic (E) -Argg(illic (Bt) – CliCalcic: accumu ltilation o f car bona tes, o ften as – Cambic (Bw) - Fragic (Bx) white, chalk-like nodules – Spodic (Bhs) - Calcic (Bk) – Fragipan: cemented, dense, brittle pan Light colored horizon Albic Argillic Weakly developed horizon Cambic No significant accumulation silicate clays Unweathered Accumulation of Acid weathering, material organic matter Fe, Al oxides Spodic Calcic Fragipan Modified from full version of Figure 3.3 in textbook (page 62). 1 Levels of Description Levels of Description • Order Most general • Order – One name, all end in “-sol” There are 12. Differentiated by presence or absence of • Suborder diagnostic horizons or features that reflect • Great group soil-forming processes. EXAMPLE: ENTISOL • Subgroup • Suborder • Family • Great group • Subgroup •Series •Family Most specific •Series Levels of Description Levels of Description • Order – One name, all end in “-sol” There are 12 . • Order – One name, all end in “-sol” There are 12 .
    [Show full text]