Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Docket No. CP16-10-000 Supplemental Materials Submitted October 20, 2016

Attachment B

UPDATED DEIS TABLES DEIS TABLE 1.3-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Land Requirements for the Mountain Valley Project in the Jefferson National Forest

Land Required for Land Required for Facility Construction (acres) Operation (acres)

Pipeline a/ 47.952.2 20.520.6 Additional Temporary Workspace (ATWS) 1.0 0.0 Access Roads 27.632.7 17.320.7 Totals 80.981.6 37.841.3 a/ Acreage based on 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way and 50-foot-wide permanent right-of-way. Does not account for reduced workspace in sensitive areas.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 1.5-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Major Environmental Permits, Licenses, Approvals, and Consultations Applicable to the Proposed Projects

Mountain Valley Project Equitrans Expansion Project Permit/ Submittal Date Receipt Date Submittal Date Receipt Date Agency Consultation (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) Federal FERC Certificate under October 23, 2015 Pending October 27, 2015 Pending Section 7 of the application filed application filed NGA with the FERC with the FERC BLM Right-of-way April 5, Pending N/A N/A Grant for COE 2016Pending and FS lands ACHP Comment on Pending Pending Pending Pending undertakings under Section 106 of the NHPA USDA FS Survey November 2014, Pending N/A N/A Jefferson permission March 2015, National Forest under the August 2015. Forestwide September 22, Standard, FW- 2016 244 Consideration of April 5, Pending N/A N/A the Right-of-Way 2016Pending Grant and Temporary Use Permit under Section 28 of the Mineral Leasing Act Cooperating Agency for EIS under Section 204 of NEPA

LRMP Amendments

Regional Forester’s Sensitive Species viability determinations

1 of 8 DEIS TABLE 1.5-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Major Environmental Permits, Licenses, Approvals, and Consultations Applicable to the Proposed Projects

Mountain Valley Project Equitrans Expansion Project Permit/ Submittal Date Receipt Date Submittal Date Receipt Date Agency Consultation (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) ROD for Forest January 22, 2016 Pending NA NA Plan filed Right-of- Amendments Way Grant under the application & National Forest PODPending Management Act COE Section 404 of February 21-24, Pending October 2015 Pending Huntington CWA & Section 2016 District, 10 of RHA Norfolk District, permits Pittsburgh Joint Permit N/A N/A June 2016 Pending District Application USDOI - FWS Section 7 of Consultation Pending Consultation Pending ESA, BGEPA, Initiated Initiated June 24, and MBTA September 2014 2015 Consultations USDOI – NPS Right-of-way Applications Pending N/A N/A ANST Office Grant to cross Pending Blue Ridge the Blue Ridge Parkway Office Parkway under the Energy Policy Act of 2005; 36 CFR 14; 16 USC5; 16 USC 79; NEPA Survey November 2015, Pending N/A N/A permission October 17, 2016 DOT - PHMSA Consultation Consultation N/A Consultation N/A and Office of Initiated October Initiated April 27, Safety, Energy, 2014 2015 and the Environment

2 of 8 DEIS TABLE 1.5-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Major Environmental Permits, Licenses, Approvals, and Consultations Applicable to the Proposed Projects

Mountain Valley Project Equitrans Expansion Project Permit/ Submittal Date Receipt Date Submittal Date Receipt Date Agency Consultation (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) State of West Virginia West Virginia Section 106 August 12, October 6 & February 5, 2016 Pending Division of NHPA October 12, & November 16, survey reports Culture and Consultations December 24, 2015 & submitted History 2015 & February January 27, 24, April 21, June February 12, 136, & July 8, March 22, 2016 reports April 4, & May submitted 2, & July 14, August 15, 2016 SHPO comments WVDEP, CAA permit for Application filed PendingApprov N/A N/A Division of Air air emissions for October 21, 2015 ed March 4, Quality the Bradshaw, 2016, March Harris, and 13, 2016, and Stallworth April 11, 2016 Compressor Stations WVDEP, Section 401 Application filed Pending N/A N/A Division of CWA Water February 25, Water and Quality 2016 Waste Certification Management Section 402 Application filed Pending Application Pending CWA NPDES February 23, Pending Permit – 2016 Construction Stormwater General Permit for Oil and Gas Related Construction Activities Section 402 Application filed Pending Application Pending CWA NPDES October Pending Hydrostatic Test 2016Pending Discharge Permit Natural Streams Pending Pending N/A N/A Preservation Act

3 of 8 DEIS TABLE 1.5-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Major Environmental Permits, Licenses, Approvals, and Consultations Applicable to the Proposed Projects

Mountain Valley Project Equitrans Expansion Project Permit/ Submittal Date Receipt Date Submittal Date Receipt Date Agency Consultation (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) WVDNR, Office Permit for Application filed Pending Application Pending of Land and construction in second quarter Pending Streams or across a 2016 stream under WV Code Chapter 5A, Article 11 West Virginia Road Crossings Application filed Pending Application Pending Department of & Encroachment second quarter Pending Transportation Permits under 2016 Section 6, Article 16, Chapter 17; Section 9, Article 16, Chapter 17; Section 8, Article 4, Chapter 17, West Virginia Code 1931 State of Virginia VDEQ – Water Section 401 N/A – issued with Pending N/A N/A Division CWA – Water the COE permit Quality Certificate Section 402 February 11, Pending N/A N/A CWA NPDES 2016, June 27, Permit – 2016 Construction Stormwater General Permit Section 402 Consultation N/A N/A N/A CWA NPDES Initiated on Hydrostatic Test March 22, 2016 Withdrawal Permit (Permit 9VAC25-200-10) Section 402 Consultation N/A N/A N/A CWA NPDES Initiated on Hydrostatic Test March 22, 2016 Discharge Permit (General Permit VAG83)

4 of 8 DEIS TABLE 1.5-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Major Environmental Permits, Licenses, Approvals, and Consultations Applicable to the Proposed Projects

Mountain Valley Project Equitrans Expansion Project Permit/ Submittal Date Receipt Date Submittal Date Receipt Date Agency Consultation (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) VDGIF Consultations on Consultation N/A N/A N/A impacts on Initiated on state-managed March 22, 2016 lands under FWS Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) Virginia Section 106 August 11 & 12, October 22 & N/A N/A Department of NHPA September 11, 27, & Historic Consultations 2015, October 8, December 30 Resources & December 1, & 31, 2015 & 2015, & January January 6, 14, March 10 & February 18, 15, June 7 & 24, April 21 , & J& July 12, 18 & May 25, 19, & August 31, August 4, & 2016 reports September 27, submitted 2016 SHPO comments Virginia Road bonds and Application filed Pending N/A N/A Department of crossing permits second quarter Transportation under Code of 2016 Virginia 33.1-12 Virginia Marine Submerged February 24, Pending N/A N/A Resources Lands License 2016 Commission under Virginia Administrative Code 4 VAC 20- 120-10 ET SEQ. Virginia Consultations Consultation N/A N/A N/A Department of Initiated on Forestry October 13, 2014 Virginia Consultations Consultation N/A N/A N/A Department of regarding wildlife Initiated on Conservation species/habitat, October 13, 2014 and Recreation state-managed lands, and state parks

5 of 8 DEIS TABLE 1.5-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Major Environmental Permits, Licenses, Approvals, and Consultations Applicable to the Proposed Projects

Mountain Valley Project Equitrans Expansion Project Permit/ Submittal Date Receipt Date Submittal Date Receipt Date Agency Consultation (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) Virginia Conversion/Dive January 22, 2016 Pending N/A N/A Outdoors rsion of Open Foundation Space Access or Utility Easement Application under Virginia Code Section 10.1-1704 State of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Section 106 N/A N/A February 5, 2016 Pending Historical and NHPA survey reports Museum Consultations submitted Commission, Bureau for Historic Preservation Pennsylvania ESA N/A N/A Consultation Pending Department of Consultations Initiated on June Conservation 24, 2015 and Natural Resources Pennsylvania Chapter 127 N/A N/A October 2015 Pending Department of Minor Source Environmental Permit Title V or Protection Minor Source (PADEP), Air Operating Permit Permits Division under CAA

6 of 8 DEIS TABLE 1.5-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Major Environmental Permits, Licenses, Approvals, and Consultations Applicable to the Proposed Projects

Mountain Valley Project Equitrans Expansion Project Permit/ Submittal Date Receipt Date Submittal Date Receipt Date Agency Consultation (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) PADEP ESCGP-2; N/A N/A March 2016 Pending General Permit for Earth Disturbance Associated with Oil and Gas Exploration, Production, Processing, or treatment operations or transmission facilities under 25 Pa. Code 102.5 (c) and (m) PAG-10 General N/A N/A Consultation N/A Permit; initiated on April Hydrostatic 27, 2015; State- Testing of Tanks wide PAG-10 and Pipelines authorization under CWA held. Permit Application Filed – March 2016 PADEP, Chapter 105 N/A N/A October 2015 Pending Division of Water Waterways, Obstruction and Wetlands, and Encroachment Stormwater Permit; CWA Management Section 401 Water Quality Certification (jointly with COE Section 404) Submerged Lands License Agreement Pennsylvania ESA N/A N/A Consultation Pending Fish and Boat Consultations Initiated on June Commission 24, 2015

7 of 8 DEIS TABLE 1.5-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Major Environmental Permits, Licenses, Approvals, and Consultations Applicable to the Proposed Projects

Mountain Valley Project Equitrans Expansion Project Permit/ Submittal Date Receipt Date Submittal Date Receipt Date Agency Consultation (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) (Anticipated) Pennsylvania ESA N/A N/A Consultation Pending Game Consultations Initiated on June Commission 24, 2015 Pennsylvania Highway N/A N/A Application Pending Department of Occupancy Pending Transportation Permit under Sections 411 and 420 of the State Highway Law N/A = Not applicable

8 of 8 DEIS TABLE 2.1-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Proposed Facilities for the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project West Facility/Project Virginia Pennsylvania Total Virginia PIPELINE (MILES) MVP 195.4196.3 105.6107.1 N/A 301.0303.4 EEP <0.1 N/A 7.8 7.9 Pipeline Subtotal 195.4 105.6 7.8 308.9 ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES New Compressor Stations (Number) MVP 3 0 N/A 3 EEP 0 N/A 1 1 New Compressor Stations Subtotal 3 0 1 4 Compressor Station Decommissioning (Number) MVP 0 0 N/A N/A EEP 0 N/A 1 1 Compressor Station Decommissioning 0 0 1 1 Subtotal M&R STATIONS, INTERCONNECTS, & TAPS (NUMBER) MVP 4 52 N/A 6 EEP 3 N/A 2 5 Total of New M&R Stations, 7 25 2 11 Interconnects, & Taps MLVs (NUMBER) MVP 22 1413 N/A 36 EEP N/A N/A N/A N/A Total of MLVs 22 1314 N/A 36 N/A = Not applicable Note: Totals may not sum correctly due to rounding.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 2.1-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Pipeline Facilities for the Mountain Valley Project State/County MP Range Length (miles) West Virginia Wetzel County 0.0 – 9.60.0 – 9.5 9.69.5 Harrison County 9.6 – 31.69.5 – 31.5 23.7 32.7 – 33.732.6 – 33.7 37.5 – 38.137.4 – 38.0 Doddridge County 31.6 – 32.731.5 – 32.6 4.8 33.7 – 37.533.7 -37.4 Lewis County 38.1 – 65.638.0 -65.5 27.5 Braxton County 65.6 – 80.365.5 – 80.2 14.7 Webster County 80.3 – 109.580.2 – 110.8 30.030.4 109.8-110.6 Nicholas County 109.5 – 109.8110.8 – 135.3 24.724.8 110.6 – 135.0 Greenbrier County 135.0 – 153.8135.3 – 154.2 21.221.3 154.3 – 156.7154.7 – 157.1 Fayette County 153.8 – 154.3154.2 – 154.7 0.5 Summers County 156.7 – 173.4157.1 – 174.3 16.717.1 Monroe County 173.4 – 195.4174.3 – 196.3 22.022.1 West Virginia (subtotal) 195.4196.3 Virginia Giles County 195.4 – 215.4 196.3 -216.8 20.020.4 Craig County 215.4 – 217.1 216.8-218.5 1.7 Montgomery County 217.1 – 236.1 218.5 – 238.1 19.019.6 Roanoke County 236.1 – 244.4 238.1 – 246.5 8.38.4 Franklin County 244.4 – 281.0 246.5 – 283.9 36.737.4 Pittsylvania County 281.0 – 301.0 283.9 – 303.4 19.919.5 Virginia (subtotal) 105.6107.1 Mountain Valley Project Total 301.0303.4 Note: Totals may not sum correctly due to rounding.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 2.1-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Summary of Pipeline Collocated with Existing Rights-of-Way Mountain Valley Project Collocation Type Distance (miles) Percent Field Road Rights-of-Way 29.929.5 9.99.7 Underground Electric/Telephone Lines/Fiber Optics Rights-of- 0.80.9 0.3 Way Local Private/Public Road Rights-of-Way 1.20.8 0.40.3 Overhead Power Lines/Electric Transmission Line Rights-of-Way 26.526.2 8.88.6 Pipeline Rights-of-Way 10.99.4 3.63.1 Railroad Rights-of-Way 0.30.0 0.10.0 National/Field Trail Rights-of-Way 12.616.8 4.25.6 State/County Road Rights-of-Way 5.55.7 1.81.9 Total 87.789.3 29.129.4 Note: Totals may not sum correctly due to rounding. Note: Not all collocated features are directly adjacent to the pipeline.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 2.1-5 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Aboveground Facilities for the Mountain Valley Project County, Facility MP StateCOUNTY, STATE Compressor Stations Bradshaw Compressor Station (with MLV 2, pig launcher and receiver, and a Wetzel, West communication tower) 2.87 Wetzel Virginia Harris Compressor Station (with pig launcher and receiver and a communication Braxton, West tower) 77.54 Braxton Virginia Stallworth Compressor Station (with pig launcher and receiver, and a Fayette, West communication tower) 154.25 Fayette Virginia M&R Stations, Interconnections, and Taps Mobley Interconnect (receipt with MLV 1 Wetzel, West and pig launcher) 0.0 Wetzel Virginia Wetzel, West Webster Tap 0.8 Wetzel Virginia Harrison, West Sherwood Interconnect (receipt) 23.76 Harrison Virginia Braxton, West WB Interconnect (delivery) 77.56 Braxton Virginia Roanoke Gas Lafayette Tap 235.7 Montgomery Virginia Roanoke Gas Franklin Tap 262.7261.4 Franklin, Virginia Virginia Transco Interconnect (delivery with pig receiver) and MLV 36 301.0303.47 Pittsylvania, Virginia Virginia Mainline Valves Harrison, West MVP-MLV 3-03 15.43 Harrison Virginia Harrison, West MVP-MLV 4-04 15.54 Harrison Virginia Doddridge, West MVP-MLV 5-05 35.034.8 Doddridge Virginia Lewis, West MVP-MLV 6-06 53.10 Lewis Virginia Lewis, West MVP-MLV 7-07 64.75 Lewis Virginia Lewis, West MVP-MLV 8-08 65.64 Lewis Virginia Braxton, West MVP-MLV 9-09 77.53 Braxton Virginia Webster, West MVP-MLV -10 93.21 Webster Virginia Webster, West MVP-MLV -11 98.76 Webster Virginia Webster, West MVP-MLV -12 101.8102.2 Webster Virginia

1 of 3 DEIS TABLE 2.1-5 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Aboveground Facilities for the Mountain Valley Project County, Facility MP StateCOUNTY, STATE Nicholas, West MVP-MLV -13 111.13 Nicholas Virginia Nicholas, West MVP-MLV -14 119.9120.2 Nicholas Virginia Greenbrier, West MVP-MLV -15 138.47 Greenbrier Virginia Greenbrier, West MVP-MLV -16 140.59 Greenbrier Virginia Greenbrier, West MVP-MLV -17 143.69 Greenbrier Virginia Greenbrier, West MVP-MLV -18 143.8144.2 Greenbrier Virginia Fayette, West MVP-MLV -19 154.24 Fayette Virginia Summers, West MVP-MLV -20 170.10 Summers Virginia Summers, West MVP-MLV -21 171.09 Summers Virginia Monroe, West MVP-MLV -22 185.2186.1 Monroe Virginia MVP-MLV -23 198.5199.4 Giles Giles, Virginia MVP-MLV -24 200.6201.5 Giles Giles, Virginia MVP-MLV -25 211.1212.4 Giles Giles, Virginia MVP-MLV -26 222.38 Montgomery, Virginia Virginia MVP-MLV -27 233.6235.0 Montgomery, Virginia Virginia MVP-MLV-28 236.4 Montgomery Virginia MVP-MLV-29 249.8 Franklin Virginia MVP-MLV-30 259.2 Franklin Virginia MVP-MLV-31 265.4 Franklin Virginia MVP-MLV-32 269.5 Franklin Virginia MVP-MLV-33 283.6 Franklin Virginia MVP-MLV-34 296.3 Pittsylvania Virginia MVP-MLV-35 299.7 Pittsylvania Virginia

TABLE 2.1-5 (continued)

Aboveground Facilities for the Mountain Valley Project Facility MP County, State MLV 28 234.5 Montgomery, Virginia MLV 29 247.1 Montgomery, Virginia

2 of 3 TABLE 2.1-5 (continued)

Aboveground Facilities for the Mountain Valley Project Facility MP County, State MLV 30 256.7 Franklin, Virginia MLV 31 262.4 Franklin, Virginia MLV 32 266.6 Franklin, Virginia MLV 33 280.7 Franklin, Virginia MLV 34 293.4 Pittsylvania, Virginia MLV 35 296.8 Pittsylvania, Virginia

3 of 3 TABLE 2.1-7 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cathodic Protection Units Along the Route of the Mountain Valley Project

Facility MP County, State State 1a0 2.3 Wetzel Wetzel, West Virginia 1b1 6.65 Wetzel Wetzel, West Virginia 2 15.54 Harrison Harrison, West Virginia 3 23.10 Harrison Harrison, West Virginia 4 35.034.8 Harrison Doddridge, West Virginia 5 46.045.8 Lewis Lewis, West Virginia 6 55.21 Lewis Lewis, West Virginia 7 62.32 Lewis Lewis, West Virginia 8 73.87 Braxton Braxton, West Virginia 9 84.1 Webster Webster, West Virginia 10 93.21 Webster Webster, West Virginia 11 98.76 Webster Webster, West Virginia 12 106.8107.0 Webster Webster, West Virginia 13 122.14 Nicholas Nicholas, West Virginia 14 127.9128.2 Nicholas Nicholas, West Virginia 15 137.9138.3 Greenbrier Greenbrier, West Virginia 16 149.25 Greenbrier Greenbrier, West Virginia 17 159.15 Summers Summers, West Virginia 18 171.0182.3 Monroe Summers, West Virginia 19 1891.4 Monroe Monroe, West Virginia 20 190200.5 Giles Monroe, West Virginia 21 199.6211.1 Giles Giles, Virginia 22 210.0227.4 Montgomery Giles, Virginia 23 225.2235.6 Montgomery, Virginia Virginia 24 233.9246.1 Roanoke Montgomery, Virginia 25 244.0255.5 Franklin Roanoke, Virginia 26 253.0264.2 Franklin, Virginia Virginia 27 261.6275.0 Franklin, Virginia Virginia 28 272.1285.5 Pittsylvania Franklin, Virginia 29 282.6297.1 Pittsylvania, Virginia Virginia 30 294.2171.9 Summers Pittsylvania,West Virginia

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 2.3-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Land Requirements Associated with the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Land Affected Land Affected During Project Component/State During Operation Construction (acres) (acres) PIPELINE FACILITIES West Virginia Pipeline Right-of-Way (MVP) 2,889.82,896.8 1,184.51,190.0 ATWS (MVP) 503.9458.7 0.0 Pipeline Right-of-Way (EEP) 0.4 0.3 ATWS (EEP) 1.6 0.0 Virginia Pipeline Right-of-Way (MVP) t) 1,551.11,568.5 639.5654.1 ATWS (MVP) 230.1200.7 0.0 Pennsylvania Pipeline Right-of-Way (EEP) 90.0 46.0 ATWS (EEP) 59.9 0.0 Subtotal Pipeline Facilities – MVP 5,181.95,117.7 1,824.01,844.1 Subtotal Pipeline Facilities - EEP 151.9 46.2 Combined MVP and EEP Pipeline Facilities Total 5,3345,269.6 1,8701,890.3 ABOVEGROUND FACILITIES West Virginia Mobley Interconnect (MVP) 5.03.2 0.81.1 Bradshaw Compressor Station (MVP) 24.036.5 5.86.3 Sherwood Interconnect (MVP) 7.112.0 2.01.1 Harris Compressor Station (MVP) 21.116.5 4.45.6 WB Interconnect (MVP t) 6.29.9 1.21.2 Stallworth Compressor Station (MVP) 24.729.9 5.77.2 Webster Interconnect (EEP) 0.8 0.8 Mobley Tap (EEP) 0.4 0.4 H-306 Tap (EEP) <0.1 <0.1 H-148 Tap (EEP) <0.1 <0.1 Virginia Transco Interconnect & North/South Launcher Receiver 6.241.0 2.42.7 Sites (MVP) Pennsylvania Redhook Compressor Station (EEP) 17.7 17.7 Pratt Compressor Station Decommissioning (EEP) 7.5 7.5 Applegate Pig Launcher/Receiver (EEP) 0.4 0.4 Hartson Pig Launcher/Receiver (EEP) 0.1 0.1 H-302 Tap & Pig Launcher/Receiver (EEP) 0.1 0.1 Subtotal Aboveground Facilities – MVP 94.2149.0 22.425.2

1 of 2 DEIS TABLE 2.3-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Land Requirements Associated with the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Land Affected Land Affected During Project Component/State During Operation Construction (acres) (acres) Subtotal Aboveground Facilities - EEP 26.4 26.4 Combined MVP and EEP Aboveground Facilities 175.4 51.6 Total YARDS West Virginia (MVP) 109.1132.6 0.0 West Virginia (EEP) 0.3 0.0 Virginia (MVP) 37.837.8 0.0 Pennsylvania (EEP) 11.4 0.0 Subtotal Yards – MVP 147.0170.4 0.0 Subtotal Yards - EEP 11.6 0.0 Combined MVP and EEP Yards Total 158.6182.0 0.0 ACCESS ROADS West Virginia (MVP) 648.5647.5 175.3173.6 West Virginia (EEP) 0.1 0.1 Virginia (MVP) 234.6258.3 71.863.9 Pennsylvania (EEP) 8.2 2.0 Subtotal Access Roads – MVP 883.1905.8 247.1237.6 Subtotal Access Roads - EEP 8.4 2.0 Combined MVP and EEP Access Roads Total 891.5914.2 249.1239.6 CATHODIC PROTECTION BEDS West Virginia (MVP) 12.011.3 6.26.1 West Virginia (EEP) 0.0 0.0 Virginia (MVP) 7.06.4 3.63.5 Pennsylvania (EEP) 1.0 1.0 Subtotal Cathodic Protection Beds – MVP 19.017.7 9.89.6 Subtotal Cathodic Protection Beds - EEP 1.0 1.0 Combined MVP and EEP Cathodic Protection Beds Total 20.0 10.8 MVP Totals 6,325.16,360.6 2,103.22,116.5 EEP Totals 199.3 75.7 COMBINED TOTALS FOR BOTH PROJECTS 6,524.46,559.9 2,178.92,192.2 Note: The totals shown in this table are rounded. Note: Land Requirements associated with the Jefferson National Forest crossing are provided in section 4.8.1.

2 of 2 DEIS TABLE 2.3-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Yards for the Mountain Valley Project State/Yard Size Type MP County Land Use a/ Name (acres) West Virginia MVP-LY-024 Laydown 0.1 Wetzel Forest 0.9 Yard MVP-LY-001 Laydown 3.52.0 Wetzel Forest, developed, open 4.9 Yard space, and agricultural MVP-LY-002 Laydown 17.715.3 Harrison Forest, developed, open 19.217.8 Yard space, grasslands, and agricultural MVP-LY-003 Laydown 25.925.8 Harrison Forest, developed, and 8.57.3 Yard open space MVP-LY-013 Laydown 31.5 Doddridge Open space, developed, 5.7 Yard forest MVP-LY-016 Laydown 45.7 Lewis Open space, developed, 9.5 Yard agriculture MVP-LY-017 Laydown 46.4 Lewis Open space, developed, 5.7 Yard agriculture MVP-LY-018 Laydown 46.5 Lewis Open space, developed, 3.3 Yard agriculture MVP-LY-001A Laydown 75.3 Braxton Agriculture 19.4 Yard MVP-RD-001 Laydown 79.0 Braxton Agriculture 15.9 Yard MVP-LY-021 Laydown 76.2 Braxton Developed, forest 3.2 Yard MVP-LY-004 Laydown 86.893.3 Braxton Barren, oOpen space, 9.28.9 Yard developed, grasslands, and agriculture MVP-LY-023 Laydown 109.4 Braxton Agriculture, open space, 6.5 Yard developed MVP-LY-005 Laydown 97.2 Nicholas Developed and open 2.6 Yard space MVP-LY-007 Laydown 114.3 Nicholas Forest, developed, open 20.5 Yard space, and agricultural MVP-LY-022 Laydown 114.5 Nicholas Agriculture, open space, 7.4 Yard developed, forest MVP-LY-007 Laydown 118.8 Nicholas Agriculture, open space, 17.8 Yard developed, forest MVP-LY-025 Laydown 154.7 Greenbrier Agriculture, open space, 4.1 Yard developed, forest MVP-PY-003 Pipe Yard 155.7 Greenbrier Forest, developed, open 28.4 space, and agricultural Subtotal 109.1132.6 Virginia MVP-PY-006 Pipe Yard 231.3234.2 Montgomery Forest, developed, open 22.8 space, and agricultural

1 of 2 DEIS TABLE 2.3-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Yards for the Mountain Valley Project State/Yard Size Type MP County Land Use a/ Name (acres) MVP-PY-005 Pipe Yard 262.9264.3 Franklin Forest, developed, and 15.0 agricultural Subtotal 37.8 Mountain Valley Project Total 147.0170.4 Note: The totals shown in this table may not equal the sum of addends due to rounding. a/ Land use data from the National Land Cover Database. However, land cover data has changed for several areas since the dataset was last updated. Land cover data presented has been verified, to the extent possible, with recent aerial imagery.

2 of 2 DEIS TABLE 2.5-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Construction Spreads for the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Spread Length Project/Spread Number Start MP End MP (miles) Mountain Valley Project 1 0 25.9 25.9 2 25.9 48.148.0 22.222.1 3 48.148.0 77.6 29.6 4 77.6 104.3104.4 26.726.8 5 104.3104.4 127.9128.2 23.723.8 6 127.9128.2 154.2154.5 26.326.3 7 154.2154.5 181.8182.7 27.628.2 8 181.8182.7 204.8205.9 23.023.2 9 204.8205.9 234.0235.8 29.329.9 10 234.0235.8 261.5264.2 27.528.4 11 261.5264.2 300.8303.4 39.539.2 Equitrans Expansion Project H-316 0.0 3.0 3.0 H-318 0.0 4.3 4.3 Redhook Compressor Station, N/A N/A N/A M-80, H-158, and H-305 Pratt Compressor Station N/A N/A N/A Decommissioning Webster Interconnect, H-319, 0.0 <0.1 <0.1 Mobley Tap N/A = Not Applicable

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 3.4.2-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Comparison of Route Alternative 1 and the Proposed Route Feature Route October 2016 Alternative 1 Proposed Route General Total length (miles) 323.8 301.0303.4 Length adjacent to existing right-of-way (miles) 101.0 22.029.4 Land disturbed within construction right-of-way (acres) a/ 4,892 4,556 Federal Lands and Federally Managed Areas National Forest System lands crossed (miles) 1.6 3.4 National Forest Wilderness crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 Appalachian National Scenic Trail crossings (number) 1 1 Blue Ridge Parkway crossings (number) 1 1 National Forest – US Forest Service-designated old growth forest crossed (feet) 0 1,700 National Forest – US Forest Service-designated old growth forest affected by constr. (acres) 0 4.8 National Forest – trails crossed (number) 15 2 National Forest – inventoried roadless areas crossed (feet) 0 4,990 National Forest – inventoried semi-primitive areas crossed (feet) 8,660 13,540 NRHP designated or eligible historic districts crossed (miles) 5.0 10.110.0 Human Environment Populated areas within 0.5 mile (number) b/ 11 8 Landowner parcels crossed (number) 1,6091,424 c/ 1,4951,334 Residences within 50 feet of construction workspace (number) 65 6366 Resources Forested land crossed (miles) 237.6 245.2248.3 Forested land affected during construction (acres) 3,608.7 3,720.03,762.1 Forested land affected during operation (acres) 1,441.2 1,486.01,504.8 Interior forest crossed (acres) 1,565.2 2,365.22,459.1 Wetlands (NWI) crossed (feet) d/ 5,525 3,2993,601 Forested wetlands crossed (feet) d/ 1,657 1,721 Forested wetlands affected by construction (acres) 2.9 3.0 Forested wetlands affected by operation (acres) 1.9 2.0 Perennial waterbody crossings (number) d/ 133 9795 Major (>100 feet) waterbodies crossed 7 5 New River crossings (number) 2 0 Shallow bedrock crossed (miles) 217.3 214.9202.5 Steep slope (>20 percent) crossed (miles) 171.4 120.0128.6 Side slope crossed (miles) 165.1 122.8158.2 Landslide potential crossed (miles) 232.2 224.2225.6 Karst area crossed (miles) 56.2 53.341.7 a/ Assuming 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way. b/ City or town limits as shown in Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) data. c/ Estimated assuming similar size and number of landowner parcels would be crossed by the alternative as those crossed by the corresponding segment of Proposed Route. d/ National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) and National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) data used in order to provide a common comparison between the two routes since field surveys were not conducted along the alternative.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 3.4.2-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Comparison of the Northern Pipeline Alternative and the Proposed Route Northern Pipeline – ACP Collocation October 2016 Feature Alternative Proposed Route General Total length (miles) 273.5 264.2266.9 Length adjacent to existing right-of-way (miles) 77.3 20.725.4 Land disturbed within construction right-of-way (acres) a/ 4,144.3 4,000.84,040.7 Federal Lands and Federally Managed Areas National Forest System lands crossed – Total (miles) 19.1 3.4 Monongahela National Forest (miles) 5.5 0.0 George Washington and Jefferson National Forests 13.6 3.4 National Forest Wilderness crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 Appalachian National Scenic Trail crossings (number) 1 1 Blue Ridge Parkway crossings (number) 1 1 National Forest – US Forest Service-designated old growth 0 1,700 forest crossed (feet) National Forest – US Forest Service-designated old growth 0 4.8 forest affected by constr. (acres) National Forest – trails crossed (number) 5 2 National Forest – inventoried roadless areas crossed (feet) 0 4,990 National Forest – inventoried semi-primitive areas crossed (feet) 0 13,540 NRHP designated or eligible historic districts crossed (miles) 0.0 10.110.0 Human Environment Populated areas within 0.5 mile (number) b/ 9 7 Landowner parcels crossed (number) 1,875 1,160c/ 1,2711,132 Residences within 50 feet of construction workspace (number) 47 4144 Resources Forested land affected during construction (acres) 2,794.8 3,203.43,247.0 Forested land affected during operation (acres) 1,117.2 1,279.41,298.8 Interior forest crossed (acres) 1,616.2 1,966.72,061.6 Wetlands (NWI) crossed (feet) d/ 4,941 3,2273,529 Forested wetlands crossed (feet) d/ 2,977 1,721 Forested wetlands affected by construction (acres) 5.1 3.0 Forested wetlands affected by operation (acres) 3.4 2.0 Perennial waterbody crossings (number) d/ 120 8684 Major (> 100 feet) waterbodies crossed 14 5 Karst area crossed (miles) 51.2 53.341.7 a/ Assuming a 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way. b/ City or town limits as shown in ESRI data. c/ Estimated assuming similar size and number of landowner parcels would be crossed by the alternative as those crossed by the corresponding segment of proposed route. d/ NWI and NHD data used in order to provide a common comparison between the two routes since field surveys were not conducted along the alternative.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 3.5.1-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Comparison of the Supply Header Collocation Alternative and the Proposed Route Supply Header October 2016 Feature Collocation Alternative Proposed Route General Total length (miles) 33.0 36.736.6 Length adjacent to existing right-of-way (miles) 4.5 1.32.0 Land disturbed within construction right-of-way (acres) a/ 499.5 555.3553.4 Land Use Populated areas within 0.5 mile (number) b/ 0 1 National Forest System lands crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 National Forest Wilderness crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 Appalachian National Scenic Trail crossings (number) 0 0 Blue Ridge Parkway crossings (number) 0 0 NRHP designated or eligible historic districts crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 Landowner parcels crossed (number) 199 181 c/ 223201 Residences within 50 feet of construction workspace (number) 3 22 Resources Forested land crossed (miles) 30.6 34.134.0 Forested land affected during construction (acres) 462.9 516.5515.2 Forested land affected during operation (acres) 185.3 206.6206.1 Interior forest crossed (acres) 310.6 398.5397.4 Wetlands (NWI) crossed (feet) 295 72 Forested wetlands crossed (feet) 0 0 Perennial waterbody crossings (number) d/ 14 11 Major (> 100 feet) waterbodies crossed 0 0 Shallow bedrock crossed (miles) 30.2 34.336.1 Steep slope (>20 percent) crossed (miles) 29.4 18.1197 Side slope crossed (miles) 25.8 17.724.6 Landslide potential crossed (miles) 33.0 36.736.6 Karst area crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 a/ Assuming 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way. b/ City or town limits as shown in ESRI data. c/ Estimated assuming similar size and number of landowner parcels would be crossed by the alternative as those crossed by the corresponding segment of Proposed Route. d/ NWI and NHD data used in order to provide a common comparison between the two routes since field surveys were not conducted along the alternative.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 3.5.1-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Comparison of the Burnsville Lake Wildlife Management Area Variation and the Proposed Route Burnsville Lake WMA October 2016 Feature Variation Proposed Route General Total length (miles) 4.1 4.3 Length adjacent to existing right-of-way (miles) 0.0 0.0 Land disturbed within construction right-of-way (acres) a/ 61.7 65.065.2 Land Use Populated areas within 0.5 mile (number) b/ 0 0 National Forest System lands crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 National Forest Wilderness crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 Appalachian National Scenic Trail crossings (number) 0 0 Blue Ridge Parkway crossings (number) 0 0 NRHP designated or eligible historic districts crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 Landowner parcels crossed (number) 15 20 Residences within 50 feet of construction workspace (number) 0 0 WMA lands crossed (miles) 1.8 <0.1 Resources Forested land crossed (miles) 4.0 4.0 Forested land affected during construction (acres) 61.1 60.9 Forested land affected during operation (acres) 24.5 24.3 Interior forest crossed (acres) 56.1 48.5 Wetlands (NWI) crossed (feet) c/ 0 0 Forested wetlands crossed (feet) 0 0 Forested wetlands affected by construction (acres) 0.0 0.0 Forested wetlands affected by operation (acres) 0.0 0.0 Perennial waterbody crossings (number) 2 43 Major (> 100 feet) waterbodies crossed 0 0 Shallow bedrock crossed (miles) 4.0 3.9 Steep slope (>20 percent) crossed (miles) 2.9 2.2 Side slope crossed (miles) 2.8 2.62.7 Landslide potential crossed (miles) 4.1 4.3 Karst area crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 a/ Assuming 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way. b/ City or town limits as shown in ESRI data. c/ NWI and NHD data used in order to provide a common comparison between the two routes since field surveys were not conducted along the alternative.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 3.5.1-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Comparison of the Elk River Wildlife Management Area Variation and the Proposed Route Elk River WMA October 2016 Feature Variation Proposed Route General Total length (miles) 16.9 17.617.7 Length adjacent to existing right-of-way (miles) 0.8 0.2 Land disturbed within construction right-of-way (acres) a/ 256.0 266.2267.5 Land Use Populated areas within 0.5 mile (number) b/ 0 0 National Forest System lands crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 National Forest Wilderness crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 Appalachian National Scenic Trail crossings (number) 0 0 Blue Ridge Parkway crossings (number) 0 0 NRHP designated or eligible historic districts crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 Landowner parcels crossed (number) 39 6255 Residences within 50 feet of construction workspace (number) 7 8 WMA lands crossed (miles) 3.2 0.0 Resources Forested land crossed (miles) 16.3 16.716.8 Forested land affected during construction (acres) 246.7 253.3254.5 Forested land affected during operation (acres) 98.7 101.4101.8 Interior forest crossed (acres) 221.2 218.2219.0 Wetlands (NWI) crossed (feet) c/ 135 102 Forested wetlands crossed (feet) 0 0 Forested wetlands affected by construction (acres) 0.0 0.0 Forested wetlands affected by operation (acres) 0.0 0.0 Perennial waterbody crossings (number) 4 85 Major (> 100 feet) waterbodies crossed 2 2 Shallow bedrock crossed (miles) 15.4 15.8 Steep slope (>20 percent) crossed (miles) 11.5 10.010.5 Side slope crossed (miles) 12.3 9.111.5 Landslide potential crossed (miles) 16.9 17.617.7 Karst area crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 a/ Assuming 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way. b/ City or town limits as shown in ESRI data. c/ NWI and NHD data used in order to provide a common comparison between the two routes since field surveys were not conducted along the alternative.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 3.5.1-4 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Comparison of Variations 110, 110R, and 110J and the Proposed Route October 2016 Variation Variation Variation Proposed Feature 110 110R 110J Route General Total length (miles) 43.4 44.3 49.5 57.858.6 Length adjacent to existing right-of-way (miles) 0.6 0.6 1.3 11.39.7 Land disturbed within construction right-of-way (acres) a/ 656.5 670.5 749.6 875.5887.2 Federal Lands and Federally Managed Areas National Forest lands crossed (miles) 6.2 6.2 5.3 3.4 National Forest Wilderness crossed (miles) 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Appalachian National Scenic Trail crossings (number) 1 1 1 1 Blue Ridge Parkway crossings (number) 0 0 0 0 National Forest – US Forest Service-designated old growth forest crossed 4,550 4,240 4,260 1,700 (feet) National Forest – US Forest Service-designated old growth forest affected 13.0 12.1 12.2 4.8 by constr. (acres) National Forest – trails crossed (number) 3 3 3 0 National Forest – inventoried roadless areas crossed (feet) 5,900 40 210 4,990 National Forest – inventoried semi-primitive areas crossed (feet) 7,150 7,100 210 13,540 NRHP designated or eligible historic districts crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.110.0 Human Environment Populated areas within 0.5 mile (number) b/ 1 1 1 1 Landowner parcels crossed (number) 181 198 250 252245 Residences within 50 feet of construction workspace (number) 0 3 9 8 Resources Forested land crossed (miles) 31.8 32.2 35.3 44.446.8 Forested land affected during construction (acres) 482.0 487.6 535.2 675.2709.1 Forested land affected during operation (acres) 192.9 195.2 214.1 269.5283.6 Interior forest crossed (acres) 368.2 372.7 395.5 386.4475.7 Wetlands (NWI) crossed (feet) c/ 446 446 765 44 Forested wetlands crossed (feet) 223 223 223 0 Forested wetlands affected by construction (acres) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.0 Forested wetlands affected by operation (acres) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 Perennial waterbody crossings (number) 19 19 25 2220 Major (> 100 feet) waterbodies crossed 0 0 0 0 Shallow bedrock crossed (miles) 26.6 27.9 28.1 36.644.8 Steep slope (>20 percent) crossed (miles) 0.021.3 0.022.4 0.024.8 0.028.6 Side slope crossed (miles) 21.1 22.0 26.2 24.331.4 Landslide potential crossed (miles) 20.9 21.7 24.6 19.219.7 Karst area crossed (miles) 26.3 25.8 32.0 40.929.5 a/ Assuming 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way. b/ City or town limits as shown in ESRI data. c/ NWI and NHD data used in order to provide a common comparison between the two routes since field surveys were not conducted along the alternative.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 3.5.1-5 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Comparison of the CGV Peters Mountain Variation and the Proposed Route CGV Peters Mountain Feature Variation Proposed Route General Total length (miles) 14.5 5.4 Length adjacent to existing right-of-way (miles) 1.6 0.0 Land disturbed within construction (acres) a/ 219.4 81.681.3 Federal Lands and Federally Managed Areas National Forest System lands crossed (miles) 1.6 1.6 National Forest Wilderness crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 Appalachian National Scenic Trail crossings (number) 1 1 National Forest – inventoried roadless areas crossed (feet) 0 60 National Forest – inventoried semi-primitive areas crossed (feet) 0 8,460 Human Environment Populated areas within 0.5 mile (number) b/ 1 0 Landowner parcels crossed (number) 53 2320 Residences within 50 feet of construction workspace (number) 2 3 Resources Forested land crossed (miles) 8.7 4.7 Forested land affected during construction (acres) 132.4 70.0 Forested land affected during operation (acres) 52.7 28.2 Interior forest crossed (acres) 24.2 45.5101.1 Wetlands (NWI) crossed (feet) c/ 103 0 Forested wetlands crossed (feet) 0 0 Perennial waterbody crossings (number) c/ 1 21 Major (> 100 feet) waterbodies crossed 0 0 Shallow bedrock crossed (miles) 4.1 1.64.3 Steep slope (>20 percent) crossed (miles) 7.3 2.93.2 Side slope crossed (miles) 7.5 2.23.1 Landslide potential crossed (miles) 1.3 0.8 Karst area crossed (miles) 11.1 4.43.6 a/ Assuming 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way. b/ City or town limits as shown in ESRI data. c/ NWI and NHD data used in order to provide a common comparison between the two routes since field surveys were not conducted along the alternative.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 3.5.1-6 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Comparison of the SR 635-ANST and the AEP-ANST Variations and the Proposed Route October 2016 October 2016 SR 635-ANST AEP-ANST Feature Proposed Proposed Variation Variation Route Route General Total length (miles) 14.6 15.916.0 7.9 4.54.6 Length adjacent to existing right-of-way 0.0 6.04.3 1.8 0 (miles) Land disturbed within construction 221.6 240.3242.9 120.0 68.869.3 (acres) a/ Federal Lands and Federally Managed Areas National Forest System lands crossed 4.6 1.6 2.6 1.6 (miles) Appalachian National Scenic Trail 1 1 1 1 crossings (number) National Forest – US Forest Service- 490 0 0 0 designated old growth forest crossed (feet) National Forest – US Forest Service- 1.4 0 0 0 designated old growth forest affected by constr. (acres) National Forest – trails crossed 6 0 0 0 (number) National Forest – inventoried roadless 8,420 60 0 60 areas crossed (feet) National Forest – inventoried semi- 8,420 8,460 0 8,460 primitive areas crossed (feet) NRHP designated or eligible historic 0.7 0.6 0 0 districts crossed (miles) Human Environment Landowner parcels crossed (number) 50 7271 26 1816 Residences within 50 feet of 3 7 2 4 construction workspace (number) Resources Forested land crossed (miles) 13.6 13.013.2 5.2 4.34.4 Forested land affected during 206.3 197.7200.0 79.3 64.466.7 construction (acres) Forested land affected during operation 82.6 78.980.0 31.7 25.826.7 (acres) Interior forest crossed (acres) 59.1 48.5145.3 39.4 45.5101.1 Wetlands (NWI) crossed (feet) c/ 97 0 0 0 Forested wetlands crossed (feet) 0 0 0 0 Perennial waterbody crossings 18 225 17 31 (number) c/ Major (> 100 feet) waterbodies crossed 0 0 0 0

1 of 2 DEIS TABLE 3.5.1-6 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Comparison of the SR 635-ANST and the AEP-ANST Variations and the Proposed Route October 2016 October 2016 SR 635-ANST AEP-ANST Feature Proposed Proposed Variation Variation Route Route Shallow bedrock crossed (miles) 6.7 5.313.6 1.5 0.43.6 Steep slope (>20 percent) crossed 8.6 9.18.8 3.9 2.93.0 (miles) Side slope crossed (miles) 7.9 9.69.2 5.9 2.73.1 Landslide potential crossed (miles) 14.6 15.98.4 7.9 4.50.3 Karst area crossed (miles) 7.8 8.2 2.9 3.3 a/ Assuming 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way. b/ City or town limits as shown in ESRI data. c/ NWI and NHD data used in order to provide a common comparison between the two routes since field surveys were not conducted along the alternative.

2 of 2 DEIS TABLE 3.5.1-9 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Comparison of the Blue Ridge Parkway Variation and the Proposed Route Blue Ridge Parkway October 2016 Feature Variation Proposed Route General Total length (miles) 1.9 1.3 Length adjacent to existing right-of-way (miles) 0.0 0.0 Land disturbed within construction right-of-way (acres) a/ 28.6 19.0 Land Use Populated areas within 0.5 mile (number) b/ 0 0 National Forest System lands crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 Blue Ridge Parkway crossings (number) 1 1 Landowner parcels crossed (number) 9 4 Residences within 50 feet of construction workspace (number) 0 0 Resources Forested land crossed (miles) 1.6 1.1 Forested land affected during construction (acres) 22.8 16.5 Forested land affected during operation (acres) 9.1 6.6 Interior forest crossed (acres) 22.8 16.5 Wetlands (NWI) crossed (feet) c/ 0 0 Perennial waterbody crossings (number) c/ 0 0 Shallow bedrock crossed (miles) 1.8 1.1 Steep slope (>20 percent) crossed (miles) 1.3 0.81.0 Side slope crossed (miles) 1.2 0.60.8 Landslide potential crossed (miles) 1.9 1.3 Karst area crossed (miles) 0.0 0.0 a/ Assuming 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way. b/ City or town limits as shown in ESRI data. c/ NWI and NHD data used in order to provide a common comparison between the two routes since field surveys were not conducted along the alternative.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 3.5.3‐1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route) Status of Minor Route Variations Reported by Stakeholders FERC ID/ Accession Parcel Number Milepost Summary of Issues Mountain Valley's Response/ Current Status Number Potential impacts to resources have been avoided, minimized, or both. Due to topography, the current alignment is the safest and most constructable route and therefore cannot be relocated per landowner's request. MVP does expect that the water source will be affected during the WV-WB-23.01, Proposed pipeline route cuts property in half and construction but will test water for quality and quantity. The easement has WV-WB- 024, 97.7,97.9, 98, landowner requested that alignment either be re- been reviewed and no areas of cutlural signicance were located. WV-WB-025, 98.1, 98.2 97.65, 97.9, routed off property or move alignment to one Environmental delineation has been completed and US Fish & Wildlife has 20150316-5023 WV- WB- 98.15, 98.16, 98.28 side of property. Landowner concerned about been consulted on concerns. MVP compensates for Timber Damages and 025.01, MVP- proximity of pipeline alignment to residence and will not restrict Timber Operations on the property. MVP agrees within its WB- 128, MVP- family cemetery on property. easement agreement that we will not diminish the use and enjoyment of ATWS-956 the landowner on their property. The current pipeline alignment is approximately a half mile from the homesite and over a half mile from the mentioned cemetery. Landowner is actively working with MVP in negotiations. No change.

Potential impacts to resources have been avoided, minimized, or both. Due to topography, the current alignment is the safest and most constructable route and therefore cannot be relocated per landowner's request. MVP does expect that the water source will be affected during the construction but will test water for quality and quantity. The easement has WV-WB- been reviewed and no areas of cutlural signicance were located. Landowner requested re-route to minimize 023.01, 024, Environmental delineation has been completed and US Fish & Wildlife has 20150609-5017 97.8 97.65, 97.9, 98.15 impacts on timber production on property and 025, 025.01 been consulted on concerns. MVP compensates for Timber Damages and family cemetery. will not restrict Timber Operations on the property. MVP agrees within its easement agreement that we will not diminish the use and enjoyment of the landowner on their property. The current pipeline alignment is approximately a half mile from the homesite and over a half mile from the mentioned cemetery. Landowner is actively working with MVP in negotiations. No change. WV-NI-004, Landowner requested a re-route to avoid an area 005, 006, MVP is evaluating a possible realignment. Suggested realignment has 20150610-5243 111.5, 111.52 experiencing development in the town of 007 been adopted. Craigsville.

WV-NI-004, WV- Landowner requested a re-route to avoid an area MVP is evaluating a possible realignment. Suggested realignment has 20150615-5054 NI-005, WV-NI- 111.3 111.52 experiencing development in the town of been adopted. 006, WV-NI-007 Craigsville. MVP continues to evaluate the potential impacts (if any). Mountain Valley has consulted with mining engineers and Warrior Energy to verify that the Coal mining company concerned that Mountain current route is viable. Any adverse affects the pipeline may have on the Valley is not aware that proposed route is within 20150615-5185 WV-GR-022 141 140.83 coal reserves will be addressed with the coal lessee and property owner at their mining permit space and requests a re- that time. Suggested reroutes were not a viable option due to multiple route. railroad crossings, constructability impacts, stream crossings and possible wetland impacts. No change. 1 of 4 DEIS TABLE 3.5.3‐1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route) Status of Minor Route Variations Reported by Stakeholders FERC ID/ Accession Parcel Number Milepost Summary of Issues Mountain Valley's Response/ Current Status Number Landowner requested a re-route to avoid area of MVP is evaluating a possible realignment. Landowner is actively working 20150120-0096 WV-SU-028 166.79 167.1 potential future residence and to minimize with MVP in negotiations. impacts on timber production. Landowner requested a re-route to avoid cutting MVP is evaluating a possible realignment. Suggested realignment has 20150428-0056 WV-SU-029 167.5 the property in half and reducing the amount of been adopted. timber available for heating source. MVP has been prohibited from surveying the property. Once access is obtained, MVP will conduct all necessary environmental surveys on the Landowner requested a re-route to minimize property and further evaluate the landowner's comments. Based on 20160223-5034 WV-SU-046 170.5 171.25 impacts on shallow wells, streams, and desktop review, the current alignment is the most suitable for the terrain residential septic systems on the property. and crossing the river with the least residential impact. MVP will consult with and obtain approvals from all necessary agencies regarding the river crossing. No change of tract status. MVP is evaluating a possible realignment to minimize or mitigate any potential impacts. The potential realignment will take into account the location of sinkholes on the property and avoid these karst features to the extent practicable. MVP will take all necessary precautions as outlined in 221.1 Landowner requested a re-route to avoid the Karst Mitigation Plan to ensure that pipeline construction and operation 20160219-5147 VA-MO-030 N/A property proposed for a future residence. in this area does not impact groundwater or sensitive karst features. Post- construction, the pipeline permanent easement will be regraded and revegetated to restore the land to be effectively open pasture or grassland that will not impact the property viewshed. Parcel no longer affected due to incorporation of the Mt. Tabor Variation.

MVP has already minimized or mitigated any potential impacts to resources on the property. MVP has studied the karst formation and will mitigate each area as needed and will have a specialist on site during construction. MVP has peformed delineations in the area and is currently working with the US Fish & Wildlife Service. MVP will perform tests on the landowner's well if requested. Cultural studies have been performed and Landowner requested a re-route to minimize have determined that no items of cultural significance were located. MVP 224.8 20150615-5061 VA-MO-054 impacts on a naturally reproducing population of is working with the State Historical Preservation Office with regard to N/A brown trout downstream of the proposed route. cultural clearances. MVP has collocated a significant portion of its easement to parallel existing infrastructure but were unable to do so in areas where safety and constructibility were a concern. Areas that were not collocated have been placed in areas of minimal timber impact. In regards to scenic concerns, the pipeline will be located with an existing powerline right of way at the Route 785 crossing. Parcel no longer affected due to incorporation of the Mt. Tabor Variation.

2 of 4 DEIS TABLE 3.5.3‐1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route) Status of Minor Route Variations Reported by Stakeholders FERC ID/ Accession Parcel Number Milepost Summary of Issues Mountain Valley's Response/ Current Status Number Mountain Valley indicated that it had identified a minor route variation (Variation 82, formerly the New River Conservancy Variation) that would The New River Conservancy (NRC) stated it avoid the conservation easement by departing from the proposed route holds a perpetual conservation easement for the near MP 202.3, relocating the pipeline to the west and south, and then parcel, also known as the “Sizemore Easement” rejoining the proposed route near MP 203.8. The Variation would be 0.4 VA-GI-035, VA- in its letter dated May 31, 2016. The NRC mile longer and affect about 7 more acres during construction, be less 20160601-5121 203.4 204.3 GI-035.01 indicated that it was unable to grant Mountain collocated with existing right-of-way, and cross more forest, karst, and side Valley the right to cross the property under the slopes. Given consideration of these factors, the FERC staff cannot legally binding terms of the conservation conclude that the New River Conservancy Variation Variation 82 is easement. preferable to the proposed route at this time. However, the FERC staff acknowledge the legitimate and ongoing concerns of the NRC as well as the value of continued coordination among the parties. No change. Mountain Valley is coordinating with the FS and has developed a draft The route filed in Mountain Valley’s application minor route variation (FS 71) that would modify the crossing of Craig crossed Craig Creek, which supports populations Not applicable multiple 218.5 219.9 Creek, reducing the number of crossings from 3 to 1. However, of endangered mussels, three times on both coordination is not yet complete. The draft route change has now been private and FS lands. incorporated into the October 2016 Proposed Route. Landowner requested a re-route to avoid MVP has been prohibited from surveying the property. Once access is VA-RO-5149, 237.3, 240.5 property which has a conservation easement obtained, MVP will conduct all necessary environmental surveys on the 20150616-5100 VA-RO- 4118 239.3, 242.5 and to minimize impacts of sedimentation property and further evaluate the landowner's comments. No change of related to construction. tract status. MVP has been prohibited from surveying the property. Once access is VA-RO-040, VA- obtained, MVP will conduct all necessary environmental surveys on the RO-042, VA- Landowner requested a re-route to avoid property and further evaluate the landowner's comments. MVP has been 238.99-239.67 20160406-5119 RO-043, VA- impacts on a residential driveway, bridge, family working with the landowner to evaluate proposed routes across property. 241.03-241.65 RO-030 (AR- cemetery, creek, and children play area. The landowner has granted limited surveying of the property and survey RO-281) crews have been able to gather data. MVP is currently reviewing the data in order to finalize the route path on this property. MVP has already minimized or mitigated any potential impacts to 251.1 resources on the property. MVP cannot collocate due to lack of 20150615-5089 VA-FR-017.12 Landowner concerned about pipeline route impac 253.5 infrastructure in the area and the proposed alignment reduces residential impact. No change. MVP has already minimized or mitigated any potential impacts to resources on the property. Existing or future agricultural use will not be Landowner requested re-route to avoid impacts VA-FR-017.11; 250.65-252.1 reduced during the operation of the pipeline . Water will be tested when 20151127-5073 on property including the use of existing VA-FR- 017.15 253.13-254.63 requested. MVP is working with USFWS in regards to disruption of native easements. habitat. The lack of infrastructure in the area makes it difficult to collocate facilities. No change. MVP has already minimized or mitigated any potential impacts to resources on the property. MVP cannot collocate with an existing powerline 298 Landowner requested a re-route to minimize 20150129-5217 VA-PI-099 easement due to cultural findings, streams, wetlands and constructability 300.9 impacts on farmland on the property. concerns. MVP has addressed the landowner's concerns and acquired an agreement across these parcels.

3 of 4 DEIS TABLE 3.5.3‐1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route) Status of Minor Route Variations Reported by Stakeholders FERC ID/ Accession Parcel Number Milepost Summary of Issues Mountain Valley's Response/ Current Status Number

MVP has already minimized or mitigated any potential impacts to resources on the property. MVP will coordinate agriculutural and timber practices during construction. Temporary fence can be constructed to allow Landowner requested a re-route to avoid for farming practices to continue during construction. MVP will replace any VA-PI-100; 101; 298.3-298.8 20151127-5076 impacts on family farm operations including the fence removed by its activity with like materials. Landowner will retain the 102 301.14-301.70 use of existing easements. right to build anywhere 25' from the centerline of the pipe. MVP cannot collocate with existing powerline easement due to cultural findings, streams, wetlands and constructability concerns. MVP has addressed the landowner's concerns and acquired an agreement across these parcels.

4 of 4 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Elevations along the Mountain Valley Project Minimum Elevation Maximum Elevation State / County (feet amsl) (feet amsl) West Virginia Wetzel 8635 1,660 Harrison 997 1,6532 Doddridge 9423 1,5020 Lewis 8089 1,632631 Braxton 830 1,87168 Webster 996 2,769 Nicholas 1,748 3,202 Greenbrier 2,388 3,4785 Fayette 2,6615 2,8042 Summers 1,502 3,7343 Monroe 1,567 3,46758 Virginia Giles 1,645 3,47653 Craig 2,14550 2,9993,002 Montgomery 1,177 3,0032 Roanoke 1,923386 3,741 Franklin 792 3,167 Pittsylvania 56686 95049 Source: USGS, 2016a amsl = Above Mean Sea Level

1 of 1 TABLE 4.1.1-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project Start End County Distance Group Formation Age Rock Types MP MP West Virginia Wetzel, 0.0 42.57 42.57 Dunkard Greene, Pennsylvanian sandstone, Harrison, Washington, and Permian potential coal Doddridge, Waynesburg seams Lewis Lewis, 42.57 71.45 28.98 Monongahela Uniontown, Braxton Pittsburgh Conemaugh a/ Casselman, Pennsylvanian shale, potential Glenshaw coal seams Braxton 71.45 80.23 8.8 Conemaugh b/ Allegheny, Pennsylvanian sandstone, Casselman, shale, potential Glenshaw coal seams Monongahela Uniontown, sandstone, a/ Pittsburgh potential coal seams Pottsville Kanawha Webster 80.23 109.75 29.52 Conemaugh Allegheny, sandstone, Casselman, shale, potential Glenshaw coal seams Pottsville Kanawha, New sandstone, River potential coal Nicholas 109.75 110.00 0.3 seams 9.8 Webster 110.009 110.86 0.8 .8 Nicholas 110.86 135.30 24.54 Greenbrier 135.30 154.13 18.8 Kanawha, New .8 River, Pocahontas Mauch Chunk Bluestone, Mississippian shale/ Princeton sandstone, Fayette 154.13. 154.63 0.5 potential coal 8 seams Greenbrier 154.63 157.16 2.54 .7 Summers 157.16. 174.33 176.27 Pottsville Pocahontas Pennsylvanian sandstone, 7 .4 potential coal seams Mauch Chunk Bluestone, Mississippian shale/ Princeton, Hinton sandstone, shale Monroe 174.33. 192.31 18.0 Hinton, Bluefield shale 4 .4 Greenbrier N/A limestone Pocono Maccrady shale 192.31. 194.83 2.5 Chemung N/A Devonian 4 .9 N/A Brallier

1 of 4

TABLE 4.1.1-3 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project Start End County Distance Group Formation Age Rock Types MP MP 194.83. 196.45 1.6 Beekmantown N/A Ordovician limestone 9 .5 St. Paul N/A Trenton, Black N/A River Martinsburg N/A shale Juniata, N/A sandstone Oswego Virginia Giles 196.55. 198.37 1.9 Lower Devonian and Silurian Lower sandstone, 5 .4 Formations - undivided Devonian and limestone Silurian 198.37. 202.31 4.0 Knox Group Cambrian - shale, 4 .4 Ordovician mudstone 202.31. 216.95 14.62 Moccasin Formation, Bays Ordovician dolostone 4 .6 Formation, Unit C, Unit B, Unit A (dolomite), limestone Juniata Formation, Reedsville Ordovician shale, Shale, Trenton Limestone, mudstone Eggleston Formation Knox Group Cambrian - dolostone Ordovician (dolomite), limestone Craig 216.95. 218.67 1.76 Juniata Formation, Reedsville Ordovician shale, 6 .2 Shale, Trenton Limestone, mudstone Eggleston Formation Montgomery 218.67. 219.17 0.55 Lower Devonian and Silurian Lower sandstone, 2 .7 Formations - undivided Devonian and limestone Silurian 219.17. 220.71 1.67 Millboro Shale and Needmore Devonian black shale, 7 9.4 Formation shale Brallier Formation shale, siltstone Chemung Formation shale, sandstone 220.719 223.30 21.60 Price Formation Mississippian sandstone, .4 .4 shale 223.30. 226.94 34.65 Elbrook Formation Cambrian, dolostone 4 .9 Upper (dolomite), Cambrian - limestone Lower Ordovician and Upper Lower limestone, Ordovician Cambrian Formations - undivided dolostone (dolomite) 226.94. 228.16 1.26 Moccasin Formation, Bays Ordovician shale, 9 .5 Formation, Unit C, Unit B, Unit A mudstone

2 of 4 TABLE 4.1.1-3 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project Start End County Distance Group Formation Age Rock Types MP MP Juniata Formation, Reedsville Shale, Trenton Limestone, Eggleston Formation 228.16. 229.07 0.98 Lower Devonian and Silurian Lower sandstone, 5 .3 Formations - undivided Devonian and limestone Silurian 229.07. 234.12 5.12 Millboro Shale and Needmore Devonian black shale, 3 .5 Formation shale Brallier Formation shale, siltstone Chemung Formation shale, sandstone 234.12. 2386.1 4.03.6 Elbrook Formation Cambrian dolostone 5 (dolomite), limestone Pumpkin Valley Shale and Rome shale, Formation; Chilhowee Group siltstone; quartzite, conglomerate Roanoke 2386.1 241.23 3.1 Chilhowee Group quartzite, 9.2 conglomerate 241.239 246.54 5.32 layered pyroxene granulite Proterozoic Y granulite .2 .4 charnockite granitic gneiss porphyritic leucocharnockite granite Franklin 246.54. 254.01 7.51 layered biotite granulite and gneiss gneiss, 4 .5 granulite porphyroblastic biotite-plagioclase augen gneiss augen gneiss layered quartzofeldspathic augen felsic gneiss, gneiss and flaser gneiss flaser gneiss 254.01. 256.03 2.0 Ashe Formation - biotite gneiss Proterozoic Z biotite gneiss 5 .5 256.03. 259.26 3.21 layered quartzofeldspathic augen Proterozoic Y felsic gneiss, 5 .6 gneiss and flaser gneiss flaser gneiss 259.26. 282.17 212.96 Ashe Formation - biotite gneiss Proterozoic Z, biotite gneiss 6 9.2 Alligator Back Formation - Proterozoic Z – meta-argillite, feldspathic metagraywacke Cambrian schist Alligator Back Formation - actinolite schist schist 282.179 284.01 1.9 Alligator Back Formation - actinolite Proterozoic Z – schist .2 .1 schist Cambrian, Pittsylvania 284.01. 303.00 18.9 Cambrian, Proterozoic Z 1 .0 Alligator Back Formation - meta-argillite, feldspathic metagraywacke schist

3 of 4 TABLE 4.1.1-3 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Bedrock Geology Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project Start End County Distance Group Formation Age Rock Types MP MP Candler Formation - phyllite and phyllite, schist schist Bassett Formation - amphibolite amphibolite, gneiss Bassett Formation - biotite gneiss biotite gneiss, gneiss Fork Mountain Formation mica schist, gneiss 303.00. 303.30 0.31 Leatherwood Granite Cambrian, granite 0 .1 Fork Mountain Formation Proterozoic Z - mica schist, Cambrian gneiss 303.30. 303.51 0.29 Newark Supergroup - sandstone, Upper Triassic sandstone, 1 .0 siltstone and shale, interbedded siltstone West Virginia GIS Technical Center, 2015a; Virginia DMME, 2015a N/A = Not Applicable

4 of 4 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-5 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Mines in Proximity to the Mountain Valley Project Distance County MP / Facility Mineral Resource / Mine Name Mine Type a/ (miles) Status b/ West Virginia Wetzel 3.5 – 7.6 Coal / Consolidated Coal Surface 0.3 Unknown 16.16.0 Sand and gravel/ Quarry Surface 0.3 Unknown

Coal / American Mountaineer 16.8 – 17.8 Underground Crossed Unknown Harrison Mine Coal / American Mountaineer 19.01 – 25.34 Underground Crossed Unknown Mine 28.08.1 – 28.57 Coal / Pittsburgh Underground Crossed Unknown 45.946 Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.3 Unknown 47.34 – 47.88 Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.3 Unknown 48.01 – 48.32 Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.1 Unknown Lewis 48.78 Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.3 Unknown Coal / Mid-Southern Energy 50.5 - 50.78 Unknown 0.2 Revoked Corp. Coal / Juliana Mining Company 92.9, 93.18 Surface <0.1 Renewed Inc. (Lower Laurel Surface Mine) 93.89 – 95.01 Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.4 Unknown 93.9 – 95.3 / Coal / Juliana Mining Company Surface 0.1 Unknown MLV-10 Inc. (Lower Laurel Surface Mine) 102.11.8 – Not started, 0.1Cross 102.43.3 / Coal / 82 East Surface Mine Surface permit expires ed MLV 12 2017 Webster Coal / 82 East Surface Mine Surface Crossed Not started, 102.6 – 103.4 permit expires 2017 Coal surface mine / ICG Inactive and not 103.30 Eastern, LLC (82 East Surface Surface 0.2 started Mine) 103.42 – Coal surface mine / ICG Inactive and not Surface Crossed 103.53 Eastern, LLC started 103.53 – 103.6 Coal / Abandoned Mine Unknown 0.2 Abandoned Coal / Tammie Lynn Coal Co Completely 107.42 Unknown 0.2 Inc. released 109.97 – Surface coal mine / K & B Coal Surface Crossed Closed/revoked 110.109.9 Co Surface coal mine / K & B Coal 111.20.9 Surface 0.2 Revoked Nicholas Co 111.0 – 111.31 Surface coal mine / K & B Coal / Surface Crossed Revoked Co MLV 13 Closed, Phase 2 118.17.8 – Coal / Donegan 10 Plant, Falcon Unknown Crossed release, 118.27.9 Land Co Inc. revegetated

1 of 4 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-5 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Mines in Proximity to the Mountain Valley Project Distance County MP / Facility Mineral Resource / Mine Name Mine Type a/ (miles) Status b/ 118.27.9 – Coal / Strip mine area Surface Crossed Unknown 118.30 118.1 – 118.22 Coal / Mining area Surface 0.2 Unknown 118.74 – Coal / Mining area Surface Crossed Unknown 118.86 120.119.9 – Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.1 Unknown 120.31 120.319.9 / Coal / Green Valley Coal Unknown 0.1 Renewed MLV 14 Company Coal / Green Valley Coal Completely 120.00 Unknown <0.1 Company released

DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-5 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Mines in Proximity to the Mountain Valley Project Mineral Resource / Distance County MP / Facility Mine Name Mine Type a/ (miles) Status b/ 122.11.9 – Coal / Quinwood No. 7 Underground Crossed Unknown 126.20 Mine Coal / Green Valley Coal 126.52 – 126.73 Company, Potato Hole Underground Crossed New Knob Deep Mine 127.06.7 – Coal / unknown Underground Crossed Unknown 131.42 132.20 Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.2 Unknown 132.41 Coal / Strip mine area Surface Crossed Unknown 133.41 Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.3 Unknown 134.03.6 Coal / unknown Underground 0.2 Unknown 134.33.9 – Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.1 Unknown 134.63 134.54 – Coal / Strip mine area Ssurface 0.2 Unknown 136.05.7 Underground coal mine / Active, 135.34.4 – Green Valley Coal underground Crossed reclamation only, 136.05 Company, numerous outfalls Greenbrier Alex Energy Inc. Surface coal mine / Alex 136.8 Surface Crossed Active, reclaimed Energy Inc.

2 of 4 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-5 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Mines in Proximity to the Mountain Valley Project Mineral Resource / Distance County MP / Facility Mine Name Mine Type a/ (miles) Status b/ Sewell Valley #1 Mine/ UndergroundSurface Active, 138.73 – 138.4 / Coal Mine, Green Valley UnknownUndergr reclamation only, Crossed MLV 15 Coal Company / Sewell ound numerous Valley #1 Mine, Warrior outfallsRenewed Energy Resources LLC Surface Coal Mine / Active, 138.7 – 139.2 Green Valley Coal Surface 0.01 reclamation only, Company numerous outfalls Surface Coal Mine, Active, Sewell Valley #1 Mine, 138.8 Surface 0.02 reclamation only, Warrior Energy numerous outfalls Resources LLC 138.54 – 139.84 / Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.3 Unknown MLV 15 139.85 – 139.9 Coal / Strip mine area Surface Crossed Unknown 142.3 – 142.61 Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.3 Unknown 144.4 – 144.5 Coal / Strip mine area Surface Crossed Unknown 144.5 – 144.6 Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.1 Unknown Underground Coal mine 144.52 – 144.6 Underground 0.1 Revoked / Lynn Dale Coal Co underground coal mine (room and pillar) / Little 145.25.7 – Inactive, one Sewell No. 1 Deep Mine, Underground Crossed 146.1 historic outfall Midland Trail Resources LLC 146.15.8 – Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.2 Unknown 146.63 Surface coal / Double N <0.1Cro Closed, no coal 146.1 – 146.7 Surface Mining Co, Inc. ssed removedRevoked

147.3 – 147.41 Coal / Strip mine area Surface Crossed Unknown 147.41 – 148.85 Coal / Strip mine area Surface 0.1 Unknown 148.85 – 148.96 Coal / Strip mine area Surface Crossed Unknown Virginia 200.6199.6 Unknown / Quarry Surface 0.4 Unknown 210.0 – 0.1Cross Giles Limestone / Quarry Surface Inactive 210.109.9 ed 212.21 / MLV 25 Iron / Price Prospect Unknown 0.1 Inactive Coal/Slayton – tunnel 221.40.1 Underground 0.3 Inactive area 236.0 – Clay / Number 2 Pit Old Crossed Montgomery Surface InaActive 236.14.2 Virginia Brick Company 0.1 <0.1Cro 2364.4 / MLV 28 Unknown / Quarry Surface UnknownInactive ssed

3 of 4 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-5 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Mines in Proximity to the Mountain Valley Project Mineral Resource / Distance County MP / Facility Mine Name Mine Type a/ (miles) Status b/ 236.2 – 236.3 Unknown / Quarry Surface 0.2 Active Nickel / Lick Fork Mine (Mackusick Mine/Flat <0.1Cro 254.41.9 Unknown Inactive Run Mine; John Light’s ssed Franklin Mine) <0.1Cro 277.24.4 Iron pit / unknown Surface Inactive ssed Unknown / Underground 281.878.9 Underground <0.1 Inactive mine Pittsylvania Sand and gravel pit 295.52.3 Surface <0.1 Inactive (granite) / unknown Sources: USGS, 2015b; USGS, 2015b; Virginia DMME, 2015b; West Virginia GIS Technical Center, 2015b; Draper Aden Associates, 2015a a/ Some distances may be shown as 0 due to rounding. b/ Unknown – status of mine and permit is not available from search of public records; Revoked – permit has been revoked; Renewed – permit has been renewed and is still active; Inactive and not started – permit issued but no activity initiated; Abandoned – mine is abandoned; Completely released – permit has been completely released; Closed/revoked – mine is closed and permit has been revoked; Closed – mine is closed; Phase 2 release – the mine is in the reclamation phase and has been revegetated, permit partially released; Revegetated – mine is closed and surface restored and revegetated; New – permit is recently approved, additional activity has not been initiated; Active, but reclamation only – mine and permit are still active but coal is no longer being removed, the site is in the reclamation phase; Numerous outfalls - the mine is permitted for NPDES discharges; Historic outfall – permitted for NPDES discharges, current status unknown.

4 of 4 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-9 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Flood Zone and Class of Pipe Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project Crossing Minimum Depth of MP County Floodplain Waterbody Length (feet) Pipe Class Cover (feet) 0.7 Wetzel North Fork Ffishing Creek 4656 1 4 4.95.0 Wetzel Price Run 642 1 4 15.45 Harrison Little Tenmile Creek 3110 3 4 18.78 Harrison Rockcamp Run 217 1, 2 4 23.01 Harrison Indian Rrun 1723 1, 2 4 25.86.0 Harrison Salem Fork 44934 1 4 34.89 Doddridge Laurel Run 199200 2, 3 4 42.67 Lewis Right Fork Freemans 135 1 3 Creek 45.86.0 Lewis Left Fork Freemans 332 1 4 Creek 55.12 Lewis Sand Fork 2442 1, 2 3 58.56 Lewis Indian Fork 182 1 4 62.23 Lewis Oil Creek 1627 1 3 72.46 Braxton Falls Run 26773 1 3 74.95.0 Braxton Little Kanawha River 8025 1, 2 4 81.67 Webster Left Fork Holly River 243 2 4 82.44 Webster Oldlick Creek 569 1 3 84.11 Webster Rright Fork Holly River 210 1, 2 3 87.44 Webster Elk River 43941 2 3 93.11 Webster Camp Creek 7863 1, 2, 3 3,4 97.77 Webster Amos Run 438 1, 2 3 98.67 Webster Lost Run 13027 1 3 98.89 Webster Laurel Creek 2287 3 3 110.109.9 Webster Strouds Creek 28458 1 3 114.40 Nicholas Big Beaver Creek 2356 1 3 116.25.8 Nicholas Big Beaver Creek 117 1 3 118.96 Nicholas Gauley River 402 2 3 126.85 Nicholas Hominy Creek 256 2 3 140.41 Greenbrier Meadow Creek 97 2 3 144.03.7 Greenbrier Meadow River 333 3 3 147.06.7 Greenbrier Little Sewell Creek 252 1 3

1 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-9 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Flood Zone and Class of Pipe Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project Crossing Minimum Depth of MP County Floodplain Waterbody Length (feet) Pipe Class Cover (feet) 154.95 Greenbrier Buffalo Creek 425320 2 4 155.84 Greenbrier Morris Fork 28677 2 4 169.98 Summers Hungard Creek 17263 2 4 171.40.4 Summers Greenbrier River 2,2581,841 3 3 172.61.8 Summers Kelly Creek 172 1 3 182.81.9 Monroe Indian Creek 1102 1, 2 4 187.66.7 Monroe Hans Creek 26058 2 3 192.01.1 Monroe Dry Creek 32830 2 4 200.3199. Giles Stony Creek 73429 2, 3 3 4 204.33.3 Giles Little Stony Creek 313 2, 3 3 211.109.9 Giles Sinking Creek 12666 2 3 212.91.6 Giles Greenbrier Branch 16387 2, 3 3 219.58.1 Montgomery Craig Creek 91881 2 4 218.6 Montgomery Craig Creek 220 2 3 223.9 Montgomery Mill Creek 411 2 3 225.2 Montgomery North Fork Roanoke 567 2 4 River 227.25.5 Montgomery North Fork Roanoke 60 2 4 River 227.35.6 Montgomery North Fork Roanoke 116 2 4 River 227.45.7 Montgomery North Fork Roanoke 428 2 4 River 230.929.2 Montgomery Bradshaw Creek 291377 2 4 235.53.6 Montgomery Roanoke River 1,228446 2,3 3 263.40.8 Franklin Little Creek 943842 2 4 262.2 Franklin Blackwater River 200 2 4 262.4 Franklin Blackwater River 400 2 4 262.5 Franklin Blackwater River 142 2 4 262.8 Franklin Blackwater River 698 2, 3 4 263.3 Franklin Blackwater River 269 2, 3 3 265.0 Franklin Blackwater River 38 2 4 269.4 Franklin Blackwater River 166 2 4 266.6 Franklin Maggodee Creek 166 1 3 269.76.9 Franklin Blackwater River 204 1 3 284.51.6 Pittsylvania Jonnikin Creek 83 1 3 284.81.9 Pittsylvania Jonnikin Creek 28 1 3 287.24.3 Pittsylvania Rocky Creek 130 1 3 289.26.3 Pittsylvania Pigg River 402 1 3

2 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-9 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Flood Zone and Class of Pipe Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project Crossing Minimum Depth of MP County Floodplain Waterbody Length (feet) Pipe Class Cover (feet) 289.987.1 Pittsylvania Harpen Creek 290 1 3 290.687.7 Pittsylvania Harpen Creek 167 1 3 292.189.2 Pittsylvania Harpen Creek 178 1 3 294.31.4 Pittsylvania Cherrystone Creek 182 1 3 295.32.4 Pittsylvania Cherrystone Creek 224 1 3 296.63.7 Pittsylvania Pole Bridge Branch 292 1 3 301.5298. Pittsylvania Little Cherrystone Creek 177 1 4 6 302.0299. Pittsylvania Little Cherrystone Creek 1,466 1, 2 4 1 300.2 Pittsylvania Little Cherrystone Creek 131 1 3 303.00.3 Pittsylvania Little Cherrystone Creek 465359 1 3

3 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-10 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Landslide Incidence and Susceptibility along the Mountain Valley Project Moderate Moderate High Incidence / Incidence / Incidence / Low Incidence / Low Incidence / Low Incidence / Total Crossing High High Moderate High Moderate Low State/ County Length (miles) Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility Susceptibility West Virginia Wetzel 9.56 9.56 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Harrison 23.7 23.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Doddridge 4.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lewis 27.54 27.54 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Braxton 14.7 14.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Webster 30.40 30.40 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Nicholas 24.87 24.87 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Greenbrier 21.32 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.10 Fayette 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 Summers 17.16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.16.7 Monroe 22.10 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.67 14.0 West Virginia Total 196.35.5 152.01.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.67 43.72 Virginia Giles 20.51 5.21 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.31 0.0 Craig 1.76 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.76 0.0 Montgomery 19.60 7.16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.50.3 0.0 Roanoke 8.43 4.43 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 Franklin 37.46.7 34.70 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pittsylvania 19.59 0.0 19.59 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Virginia Total 107.15.5 51.30.0 22.26 0.0 0.0 33.51.0 0.0 MVP Total 303.51.0 203.41.7 22.26 0.0 0.0 34.11.7 43.72 Source: Godt, 2014

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-11 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Areas of Landslide Concern along the Mountain Valley Project Slope Percent Movement Start MP End MP Distance Slope a/ b/ Notes c/ 3.3 3.8 2,147 33 No Dormant slide and/or soil prone to movement. Intersects at least three natural drains. 28.10 28.43 967 29 No Near well appurtenances. Side cut would run across at least three natural drains. 32.54 32.76 749 32 No Dormant slide and/or soil prone to movement. Located at toe of slope. Hillside previously cleared. 33.65 33.87 570 42 No Dormant slide and/or soil prone to movement. Located at toe of slope. Hillside previously cleared. 34.42 34.54 377 28 No Moderate side slope, includes slight pipe bend. Cuts across at least one natural drain. 34.65 34.87 907 28 No Downslope of ridge. Cuts across at least three, possibly four or five natural drains and one or two four-wheeler paths. 35.31 35.53 869 40 No Construction equipment may need to be staged on sidehill here. Southeastern side less steep, may be better to stage. 43.53 43.64 494 30 No Steep side slope, but ridge within right-of-way. 46.76 46.98 448 36 Yes Existing dormant slide possibly upslope, and active within past twenty years. Cuts across at least one natural drain, possibly two. 53.10 53.43 872 22 No Adjacent slopes composed of dormant slides. Moderate side slope directly below cemetery. Cuts across some kind of existing right-of-way or road, and at least two natural drains. 55.12 55.32 224 35 No Moderate side slope, cuts across slope. No signs of recent movement. 57.32 57.87 806 18-40 No ROW will run alongside hill with 32% grade and a 40% grade directly below it. 69.34 69.65 1,128 29 No Cuts across one large natural drainage. No signs of recent movement. 81.98 82.21 1,462 35 No Route crosses dormant slide area. Moderate side slope. No natural drains, but is directly above house or farm structure. Landowner issues may force it to be on the east side below the road, intersecting at least three natural drains. 82.65 82.76 602 45 No Route cuts through a colluvial slope which is very prone to sliding. Very steep side slope, right above ravine, possibly crossing one natural drain. 111.7 111.8 231 12 – 39 No Moderately steep slope. Pipeline cuts through either dormant slide or material prone to sliding.

1 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-11 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Areas of Landslide Concern along the Mountain Valley Project Slope Percent Movement Start MP End MP Distance Slope a/ b/ Notes c/ 122.25 123.02.7 2,547 7 – 43 No Crosses at least 5 streams or natural drains. Cuts through dormant slide or material prone to sliding. 123.12.8 123.22.9 362 22 No Route crosses soil prone to movement. Mild side slope directly below power line right-of- way. Cuts across one natural drain. 124.30 124.74 648 15-20 Yes Possible recent landslides, and this portion of route crosses through soil prone to movement. 127.26.9 127.47.1 631 12 – 39 No Moderately steep slope below ridge. Cuts through dormant slide or material prone to sliding. 127.96 128.07.7 423 10 – 60 No Moderately steep slope below ridge. Cuts through dormant slide or material prone to sliding. 132.01.7 132.11.8 646 25 No Portion of route is adjacent to soil prone to movement to the west and a dormant slide to the east. Moderate side slope. Cuts across at least one natural drain. 144.36 146.05.7 8000 30-35 No Steep and very long side slope. Cuts across at least 3 natural drains. Two hard 90’s one after the other in route. 164.26 165.14.75 1320 33-43 No Steep slide slopes outside of construction ROW. Two gullies at saddles are outside of the construction ROW. 182.41.5 182.81.9 808 18-28 Yes Some slope movement is indicated on historical imagery within the past 20 years. 196.35.4 197.66.7 1800 18-26 No Jefferson National Forest. 198.67.7 199.18.2 2300 18-35 No Jefferson National Forest. 204.43.5 204.73.8 1,120 39 No Lateral slope side cut, paralleling transmission power line. 211.50.3 211.80.6 1,184 32 – 53 No Very steep slope, centerline may or may not be on ridge. Directly above U.S. 460. 219.68.3 221.019.7 1200 25-40 No Jefferson National Forest. 220.6 220.7 310 59 No Very steep slope where route makes a 90 degree turn off the ridge. Very short section, but because of the severity of slope, could be prone to slippage. Cuts across one stream. 221.8 221.9 380 46 No Steep slope runs alongside of knoll, directly above substation. 261.559.0 261.659.0 179 40 No Steep side slope, but just for small section. Running just below ridge line through a gulley. Crosses one natural drain. 263.9 264.0 368 34 No Steep side slope. Running just below ridge line through a gulley. Crosses one natural drain.

2 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-11 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Areas of Landslide Concern along the Mountain Valley Project Slope Percent Movement Start MP End MP Distance Slope a/ b/ Notes c/ a/ Design slope is based on desktop and field review, or range from map analysis of alignment. b/ Based on historical imagery. c/ Based on available landslide mapping. Source: Godt, 2014

3 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.1.1-14 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Summary of Shallow Bedrock along the Mountain Valley Project State/County Miles of Shallow Bedrock West Virginia 17988.8 Wetzel 118..8 Harrison 22.20.1 Doddridge 4.68.3 Lewis 25.61 Braxton 13.15.5 Nicholas 21.44.6 Greenbrier 20.24.1 Fayette 0.5 Summers 15.14 Monroe 19.99.4 Virginia 29.49 Giles 6.73.6 Craig 0.64 Montgomery 13.01.9 Roanoke 3.12 Franklin 12.10.8 Pittsylvania 0.6 Mountain Valley Project Total 216.0118.0 Source: USDA, 20165 Note: Columns may not total correctly due to difference cause by rounding.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.1.2-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Steep Slopes along the MVP pipeline Route on the Jefferson National Forest Miles Grade Max Slope Min Slope Mountain Flank (N)orth or Start MP End MP Crossed (%) (%) (%) (S)outh 195.1196.4 195.4196.7 0.3 >30 58.8-42.6 17.4-16.3 S flank Peters Mtn. 195.5196.7 195.7196.9 0.2 >3015- -49.327.6 -15.615.1 S flank Peters Mtn. 30 196.9 197.0 0.1 >30 42.8 16.0 S flank Peters Mtn. 197.0 197.1 0.1 15-30 -27.1 -15.6 S flank Peters Mtn. 197.2 197.3 0.1 >30 31.7 15.7 S flank Peters Mtn. 197.4 197.5 0.1 15-30 -25.5 -15.1 S flank Peters Mtn. 197.5 197.4 0.3 >30 32.0 15.0 S flank Peters Mtn. 217.2218.5 217.2218.6 0.1 >30 -62.4-64.9 -24.2-30.4 S flank Sinking Creek Mtn. 217.3218.6 217.3219.1 0.010.5 15- -17.2-53.5 -16.115.9 S flank Sinking Creek Mtn. 30>30 217.3219.9 217.3219.9 0.1.01 >30 -49.2-34.0 -24.4-17.7 S flank Sinking Creek Mtn.N flank Brush Mtn. 217.4219.9 217.5220.0 0.10.1 >30 -44.645.8 -20.216.0 S flank Sinking Creek Mtn.N flank Brush Mtn. 217.5220.1 217.6220.2 0.10.1 >3015- -37.322.0 -20.716.0 S flank Sinking Creek Mtn.N 30% flank Brush Mtn. 217.6220.2 217.6220.3 0.030.1 >3015- -34.720.5 -18.116.5 S flank Sinking Creek Mtn.N 30% flank Brush Mtn. 217.6220.4 217.8220.7 0.10.3 >30 -40.844.5 -16.616.3 S flank Sinking Creek Mtn.N flank Brush Mtn. 217.9 217.9 0.0 15-30 -17.1 -15.0 S flank Sinking Creek Mtn. 218.5 218.5 0.04 15-30 -24.5 -15.1 N flank Brush Mtn. 218.7 218.7 0.04 >30 40.0 30.3 N flank Brush Mtn. 218.8 218.9 0.05 15-30 22.0 16.5 N flank Brush Mtn. 219.0 219.0 0.1 15-30 21.6 16.5 N flank Brush Mtn. 219.1 219.4 0.3 >30 44.5 15.7 N flank Brush Mtn. Mtn. = Mountain

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.2.1-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Soil Limitations along the Mountain Valley Project (in Acres) Water Erosion Wind Erosion Compaction Stony/Rocky Revegetation Poor Drainage Prime Farmland c/ Hydric Soils d/ Potential a/ Potential b/ Potential e/ Soils f/ Potential g/ Potential h/ Facility Perm Temp Perm Temp Perm Temp Perm Temp Perm Temp Perm Temp Perm Temp Perm Temp

Pipeline Right-of- - 3,688.93 - 0 - 1,928.78 - 062.9 0 62.05 - 1,241.53 - 248.2 - 33.40. Way 718.8 93.7 0.9 7.0 402 9 Meter Stations 2.43.2 24.312.3 0 0 4.73 53.112.3 0 0 0 2.50 0 0.31.6 0 0 0 0 Compressor 12.41 70.358.2 0 0 15.93. 54.640.1 0 0 0 1.60 2.1 28.53.6 0 0 0 1.60 Stations 0.4 8 0 55.94.7 0 0 0 118.612 0 068.8 0 41.62 0 0 0 0 0 34.65 Yards 1.4 8.5 4.8 Temporary and 139.2 524.373 0 0 85.7 324.831 016. 044.9 29.8 83.72 79.5 280.534 6.02 25.37 8.21 30.02 Permanent 187.4 2.8 7 3 7.3 5 95.6 0 1.3 3 0.5 4.7 Access Roads Additional 0 451.250 0 0 0 393.945 0 044.1 0 50.73 0 168.115 0 31.73. 0 16.32 Temporary 0.1 9.2 1.1 6.6 3 0.8 Workspace Cathodic 0 6.229 0 0 0 14.857.8 0 010.1 0 5.56.7 0 0.61 0 0.91.2 0 2.26.4 Protection Areas 15420 48515,2 0 0 106.3 2888.52, 016. 0230. 29.8 247.6 81.6 1719.51, 6.02 306.1 8.21 118.1 Subtotal i/ 1 56.4 103.8 901.5 3 8 7.3 313.7 97.7 759.8 1.3 509.5 0.5 137.6 142.2 500548515,077 0 2994.83,005.3288 0247.1 343.5277.4149 1801.11,857.517 312.1530.8306 126.3148.1118 Project Total i/ 8.5 .5247.6 19.5 .1 .1 Source: USDA, 2015a; 2015b Note: Totals may not sum correctly due to rounding. a/ Areas identified as highly water erodible soils are ranked as “very severe” or “severe” by SSURGO erosion hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail) criteria. b/ Areas identified as highly wind erodible soils have a wind erodibility index of 1 or 2 as determined by SSURGO. c/ Areas identified as prime farmland are identified as lands that meet the “all prime farmland” or “farmland of statewide and local importance” criteria as determined by NRCS, SSURGO. d/ Areas identified to have a hydric rating include the “all” and “partial” criteria as determined by SSURGO. e/ Areas identified to have a severe compaction potential are limited to silt loam or finer based on particle size and ranked “somewhat poor,” “poor,” and “very poor” drainage as determined by SSURGO. f/ Areas identified to have stony/rocky soils are soils that as determined by SSURGO include stone, rocky, or cobbles in the soil name (does not include rock outcrops). g/ Areas identified to have poor revegetation potential are lands that have a Capability Class 3 or greater, a low available water capacity and slopes greater than 8 percent as determined by SSURGO. h/ Areas identified to have poor drainage potential are ranked as “poor” or “very poor” as determined by SSURGO. i/ Temporary and Total acreages include the subset of Temporary that is Permanent acreage.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.2.1-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Soil Limitations Along the Mountain Valley Project Pipeline Route Within the Jefferson National Forest (in Acres) Poor Water Wind Re- Prime Hydric Rocky/ Compaction Drainage Erosion Erosion vegetation Soil Farmland Soils Stony Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential a/ b/ Soils c/ g/ d/ e/ f/ h/ Bailegap sandy loam, 15 to 35 ------0.1 ------percent slopes Bailegap sandy loam, 35 to 60 ------1.8 ------percent slopes Berks and Weikert soils, 25 to 65 0-- 0-- 0-- 0-- 11.31.6 0-- 0-- 11.3-- percent slopes Berks and Weikert very stony soils, 15 0-- 0-- 1.80.6 0-- 1.80.6 0-- 0-- 1.8-- to 35 percent slopes Berks-Rock outcrop complex, 25 to 70 0-- 0-- 0-- 0-- 17.1 0-- 0-- 0-- percent slopes Berks-Weikert complex, 15 to 25 0-- 0-- 0-- 0-- 0.75 0-- 0-- 0.7-- percent slopes Calvin very channery loam, 3 to 15 percent -- -- 0.3 ------slopes, extremely stony Calvin-Rough complex, 35 to 70 0-- 0-- 0.46 0-- 0.46 0-- 0-- 0.4-- percent slopes, very stony Craigsville soilsClymer sandy 0-- 2.5-- 0-- 0-- 05.1 0-- 2.5-- 0-- loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes Dekalb channery loam, 55 to 70 0-- 0-- 3.10.0 0-- 3.10.0 0-- 0-- 3.10.0 percent slopes, very stony Jefferson extremely stony soils, 7 to 25 0-- 0-- 10.50.6 0-- 10.50.6 0-- 0-- 0-- percent slopes Jefferson loam, 15 to ------0.1 ------35 percent slopes Jefferson loam, 3 to 4.9 ------15 percent slopes Jefferson very stony soils, 7 to 15 percent 1.80.3 0-- 1.84.9 0-- 0-- 0-- 0-- 0-- slopes Lehew and Wallen soils, very stony, 35 0-- 0-- 10.7 0-- 10.7 0-- 0-- 1.7-- to 65 percent slopes Lily gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 35 ------1.1 ------percent slopes

1 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.2.1-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Soil Limitations Along the Mountain Valley Project Pipeline Route Within the Jefferson National Forest (in Acres) Poor Water Wind Re- Prime Hydric Rocky/ Compaction Drainage Erosion Erosion vegetation Soil Farmland Soils Stony Potential Potential Potential Potential Potential a/ b/ Soils c/ g/ d/ e/ f/ h/ Lily gravelly sandy loam, 35 to 60 ------0.8 ------percent slopes Lily-Bailegap complex, very stony, 0-- 0-- 3.9 0-- 3.9 0-- 0-- 0-- 15 to 35 percent slopes Lily-Bailegap complex, very stony, 0-- 0-- 10.82.1 0-- 10.82.1 0-- 0-- 0-- 35 to 65 percent slopes Nolichucky very stony sandy loam, 15 0-- 0-- 10.5 0-- 10.5 0-- 0-- 0-- to 30 percent slopes Nolichucky very stony sandy loam, 30 0-- 0-- 40.7 0-- 40.7 0-- 0-- 0-- to 65 percent slopes Oriskany very cobbly sandy loam, 15 to 35 -- -- 4.4 ------percent slopes, very stony Oriskany very cobbly sandy loam, 3 to 15 ------percent slopes, rubbly Oriskany very cobbly sandy loam, 35 to 60 ------1.7 ------percent slopes, rubbly Oriskany very cobbly sandy loam, 35 to 60 -- -- 0.8 -- 0.8 ------percent slopes, very stony Total 1.8 2.5 40.2 0 51.5 0 2.5 19

2 of 3 TABLE 4.2.1-3 (continued)

Soil Limitations Along the Mountain Valley Project Pipeline Route Within the Jefferson National Forest (in Acres) USDA, 2015a; 2015b; NRCS, 2016 (gSSURGO). Available online at: https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed March 29, 2016. Note: Totals may not sum correctly due to rounding. a/ Areas identified as prime farmland are identified as lands that meet the “all prime farmland” or “farmland of statewide and local importance” criteria as determined by NRCS, SSURGO. b/ Areas identified to have a hydric rating include the all and partial criteria as determined by SSURGO. c/ Areas identified to have stony/rocky soils are soils that as determined by SSURGO. Include stone, rocky or cobbles in the soil name (does not include rock outcrops). d/ Areas identified to have poor drainage potential are ranked as “poor” or “very poor” as determined by SSURGO. e/ Areas identified as highly water erodible soils are ranked as “very severe” or “severe” by SSURGO erosion hazard (Off- Road, Off-Trail) criteria. f/ Areas identified as highly wind erodible soils have a wind erodibility index of 1 or 2 as determined by SSURGO. g/ Areas identified to have a severe compaction potential are limited to silt loam or finer based on particle size and ranked “somewhat poor,” “poor,” and “very poor” drainage as determined by SSURGO. h/ Areas identified to have poor revegetation potential are lands that have a Capability Class 3 or greater, a low available water capacity and slopes greater than 8 percent as determined by SSURGO.

3 of 3 TABLE 4.3.1-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Aquifers Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project and Equitrans Expansion Project Nearest Project/State/ Major Aquifer Project Bedrock Unit(s) Dominant Lithology County System Name MP(s) Mountain Valley Project West Virginia Wetzel Upper Pennsylvanian Harrison 0.0 to 42.57 Appalachian Sandstone, siltstone, (Monongahela Group) and Plateau shale Doddridge Permian (Dunkard Group)

Lewis and 42.57 to Braxton 71.45 Lower Pennsylvanian (Conemaugh Group) Siltstone, shale, Appalachian 71.45 to (Allegheny, Kanawha, New limestone, coal, Braxton Plateau 80.23 River, and sandstone Pocahontas formations) Mississippian bedrock 80.23 to (Pottsville Group, Mauch Chunk 109.75; Group, Hinton Formation, Webster Appalachian Sandstone and shale, 110.009.8 to Bluefield, Bluestone, and Plateau limestone 110.86 Princeton Formations, Greenbrier Group, Maccrady Formation and Pocono Group) 109.75 to Lower Pennsylvanian 110.009.8; (Conemaugh Group) Siltstone, shale, Nicholas Appalachian 110.86 to (Allegheny, Kanawha, New limestone, coal, Plateau 135.30 River, and Pocahontas sandstone 135.30 to formations) 154.13.8; Greenbrier 154.63 to 157.16.7 Mississippian bedrock (Pottsville Group, Mauch Chunk 154.13.8 to Group, Hinton Formation, Fayette Appalachian Sandstone and shale, 154.63 Bluefield, Bluestone, and Plateau limestone 157.16.7 to Princeston Formations, Summers 174.33.4 Greenbrier Group, Maccrady Formation and Pocono Group) 174.33.4 to Monroe 192.35.5 Appalachian Shales, sandstone, Devonian and Silurian Monroe 192.373.4 to Plateau siltstone (continued) 196.55.5 Valley and Sandstone, shale, Ordovician Ridge limestone, dolomite Virginia 196.55.5- Valley and Giles 216.95.6 Ridge Sandstone, shale, Ordovician 216.95.6 to Valley and limestone, dolomite Craig 218.67.2 Ridge 218.67.2 to Valley and Mississippian-Devonian-Silurian Sandstone and shale, Montgomery 2386.1 Ridge aquifer system limestone

1 of 2 TABLE 4.3.1-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Aquifers Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project and Equitrans Expansion Project Nearest Project/State/ Major Aquifer Project Bedrock Unit(s) Dominant Lithology County System Name MP(s) 2386.1 to Valley and Roanoke 241.239.2 Ridge 241.239.2 to Valley and Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer Sandstone, shale, Roanoke 246.54.4 Ridge system limestone, dolomite TABLE 4.3.1-1 (continued)

Aquifers Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project and Equitrans Expansion Project Nearest Project/State/ Major Aquifer Project Bedrock Unit(s) Dominant Lithology County System Name MP(s) Undifferentiated sedimentary 246.54.4 to Blue Ridge Blue Ridge and Piedmont Franklin rock; gneiss, schist, and 284.079.2 and Piedmont aquifer system metamorphic rock 284.079.2 to Blue Ridge Gneiss, schist, and Pittsylvania Piedmont aquifer System 3031.50 and Piedmont metamorphic rock Equitrans Expansion Project Pennsylvania H-305, Greene H-316, H-158, M-80 Appalachian H-318, Pittsburgh Low Plateau Sandstone Allegheny Plateau MP 0.0 to 3.0 H-318, Washington MP 3.0 to 4.3 West Virginia Appalachian Wetzel H-319 Upper Pennsylvanian Sandstone, siltstone, shale Plateau Sources: USGS, 1995; 1997a; 2001; 2003; 2007

2 of 2 TABLE 4.3.1-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route) Springs and Swallets Identified within 500 feet of the Mountain Valley Project Construction Work Area a/

Direction / Geologic Occurrence / Karst State / County Name MP Location Influence? a/, b/

Mountain Valley Pipeline West Virginia Lewis c/ Unnamed spring 45.8 20 feet east Uniontown Sandstone / No Lewis c/ Unnamed spring 58.67 130261 feet Uniontown Sandstone / No northeast Webster c/ Three uUnnamed springs 81.78 50 and 130 feet Kanawha Sandstone / No west, 315 feet east123 feet south Webster c/ Two unnamed springs 82.4 30 and 72 feet Kanawha Sandstone / No west Nicholas c/ Unnamed spring 122.96 98 feet Kanawha Sandstone / No southeast271 feet east Nicholas c/ Unnamed spring 132.2 38 feet north New River Sandstone / No Greenbrier c/ Unnamed spring 150.85 139 feet Pocahontas Sandstone, Shale northwest / No Greenbrier c/ Unnamed spring 150.96 74 feet south Pocahontas Sandstone, Shale / No Greenbrier c/ Unnamed spring 155.30 45 feet east303 Bluestone, Princeton Shale feet northeast and Sandstone / No Summers c/ Unnamed spring 161.3 In access road Bluestone, Princeton Shale MVP-SU198 and Sandstone / No Summers d/ Unnamed springSwallet 173.22.5 220 feet Pickaway Limestone / Yes southwest400 feet south Summers d/ Unnamed spring 173.72.8 260 feet south Pickaway Limestone / Yes Summers d/ Swallet 172.9 500 feet south Pickaway Limestone / Yes

Virginia Giles d/ Swallet (dye traced to Doe 207.86.7 430 feet south Martinsburg / Eggleston / Creek Spring on New River Moccasin / Yes by the VADCR) Giles d/ Tawneys Spring 211.1 325 feet north Undivided limestone / Yes Giles d/ Large Uunnamed spring 214.33.6 100 feet Knox dolostone / Yes northeast300 feet north Giles d/ Canoe Cave Spring 214.9 360 feet Knox dolostone / Yes southeast Giles d/ Stream insurgence 216.24.9 24000 feet Undivided limestone / Yes south Giles d/ Large stream insurgence in 215.2 400 feet north Undivided limestone / Yes sinkhole filled with farm trash.

1 of 2 TABLE 4.3.1-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route) Springs and Swallets Identified within 500 feet of the Mountain Valley Project Construction Work Area a/

Direction / Geologic Occurrence / Karst State / County Name MP Location Influence? a/, b/

Giles d/ Swallet 216.65.3 45000 feet Undivided limestone / Yes north Craig d/ Stream insurgence in open 218.156.8 140 feet east Undivided limestone / Yes throat sinkhole Montgomery Unnamed spring used for 225.0 within 150 feet Knox dolostone / Yes d/ cattle south Montgomery Unnamed spring 225.4 500 feet south Stones River limestone / Yes d/ Montgomery Johnsons Cave Spring 225.5 300 feet south Stones River limestone / Yes d/ Montgomery Wet weather sSwallet 227.555.9 80 feet Edinburg limestone / d/ southwestwithin YesStones River limestone / 150 feet south Yes Montgomery Swallet 234.4 140 feet Elbrook dolostone / Yes d/ southwest Franklin c/ Two unnamed springs 248.9 80 feet north Layered biotite granulite and gneiss (Proterozoic) / No Franklin c/ Unnamed spring 252.9 103 feet south Charnockite (Proterozoic) / No Franklin c/ Unnamed spring 256.54.0 28 feet Porphyroblastic biotite- north256 feet plagioclase augen gneiss / No east Pittsylvania c/ Two unnamed springs 303.3 290 feet Newwark Supergroup – southeast sandstone, siltstone and shale, interbedded / No a/ Information on privately owned springs is not publically available for West Virginia, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. Therefore, springs on private property may not be represented in this table. b/ It is noted that specific groundwater direction and velocity information is not available for springs and swallets in the karst areas. Mountain Valley’s Karst Mitigation Plan and Water Resources Identification and Testing Plan include measures to ensure the protection of water resources in karst terrain – including additional field studies if necessary (see table 2.3-2 for the location of these plans). c/ Holland, 2015 d/ Draper Aden Associates, 2015c, 2016 e/ McColloch, 1986 VADCR = Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation

2 of 2 DEIS TABLE 4.3.1-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Sites with Potential for Contaminated Groundwater within 200 Feet of the Mountain Valley Pipeline and the Equitrans Expansion Projects’ Workspace Location Distance from Site (Nearest Project Project Site Status MP) (feet) Mountain Valley Project Consolidation Coal Company 7.98.0 174 Ongoing monitoring Pike Coal Recovery 87.34 143 Reclamation completed in 1983 William D. Smith Trucking 211.30.1 160 Enforcement and reporting ongoing Lafayette Church Property 235.6 150 Closed Howard Allen Residence 234.1 119 Closed Storage Tank Environmental Options Article 263.9 88 Closed 11 Facility Storage Tank Equitrans Expansion Project Iams Residential Sewage 0.1 H-318 200 In compliance with permits Treatment Plant Sources: EPA, 2015c; WVDEP, 2016; VDEQ, 2016

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Watersheds Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project and Equitrans Expansion Project State Sub-basin (8-digit HUC) a/ Start MP End MP Mountain Valley Project West Virginia Little Muskingum-Middle Island (05030201) 0.0 9.23 31.456 32.765 34.033.6 37.533.6 33.7 33.7 33.7 33.7 33.8 36.6 36.6 36.8 36.88 37.49 36.7 36..7 36.9 37.3 West Virginia West Fork (05020002) 9.234 31.45 32.68 33.679 37.636.833.6 43.436.833.7 45.537.433.7 47.443.233.7 48.545.333.7 50.047.333.8 36.6 36.6 36.8 36.8 36.9 36.9 37.2 37.2 37.4 43.23 45.3 47.2 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.4 48.3 49.3 49.3 49.3 49.4 49.9 48.4 49.9 West Virginia Little Kanawha (05030203) 43.235 45.324 47.045 47.08.34 47.2 47.3 47.3 47.3 47.4 48.3 48.5 48.5 49.3 49.3 49.3 49.4 49.950.01 78.478.34 West Virginia Elk (05050007) 78.4 105.1 105.1 105.2 105.3 105.4 105.5 105.6 105.8 107.5 107.55 107.57.54.9 105.6 107.3

1 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Watersheds Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project and Equitrans Expansion Project State Sub-basin (8-digit HUC) a/ Start MP End MP West Virginia Gauley (05050005) 105.10 105.15 107.4105.23 158.3105.37 158.8105.47.6 158.8161.6105.6 105.659.1 159.4105.8 159.7107.4 159.9107.5 160.1107.5 160.4157.2 160.7157.2 160.9158.8 161.1159.1 161.2159.3 159.5 159.8 159.8 159.8 160.0 160.3 160.4 160.8 161.1 161.2 161.3 161.4 161.4 161.7 West Virginia Lower New (05050004) 156.8157.2 156.8157.2 158.4157.7 1587.7 158.9158.8 159.10 159.5159.3 159.56 160.0159.8 160.0159.8 160.5159.8 160.06 161.0160.3 161.0160.4 161.3160.8 163.3161.1 163.5161.2 163.6161.3 163.9161.4 164.0161.4 164.4161.7 164.4163.7 163.8 164.1 164.2 164.5 164.7 164.8

2 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-1 (continued) Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route

Watersheds Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project and Equitrans Expansion Project State Sub-basin (8-digit HUC) a/ Start MP End MP West Virginia Greenbrier (05050003) 163.4 163.4 163.8 163.7 164.23163.8 164.1163.7 173.4180.7164. 164.15 2 173.5 179.1 179.3 179.4 179.6 179.8 180.1164.5 180.1164.7 164.8 180.0 180.0 180.1 180.1 180.3 180.5 180.5 180.5 180.7 181.12 181.12 West Virginia Middle New (05050002) 179.2180.04 179.2180.03 179.5180.17 179.5180.08 180.1181.1180. 179.9180.3 5 180.5

180.7 180.5 181.1 181.1 196.31.1 196.3 180.3 196.3195.4 Virginia Middle New (05050002) 1965.3 218.5 196.385 196.37.1 Virginia Upper James (02080201) 218.567.2 219.4220.7 Virginia Upper Roanoke (03010101) 219.5220.78 290.5293.4 Virginia Banister (03010105) 290.6293.45 300.830.3.47 Equitrans Expansion Project Pennsylvania Lower Monongahela (05020005) H-305 0.0 H-305 0.1 H-318 0.0 H-318 4.3 H-316 0.0 H-316 3.0 H-158/M80 0.0 H-158/M80 0.2 West Virginia Little Muskingum-Middle Island (05030201) H-319 0.0 H-319 <0.1 Source: USGS, 2015 a/ Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) is a classification system developed by the USGS to classify drainage basins from the regional level to individual watersheds.

3 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Number of Waterbody Crossings for the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project a/ FERC Size Classification Flow Type Project/State Minor Intermediate Major Total Perennial Intermittent Ephemeral Total Mountain Valley Project West 48959 120112 4 613711 208219 199270 206222 613711 Virginia 5 Virginia 29232 8172 0 373397 153170 111122 109105 373397 5 Subtotal 78192 201184 4 986110 361389 310392 315327 9861108 0 8 Equitrans Expansion Project West 2 2 0 4 3 1 0 4 Virginia Pennsylvani 23 7 1 31 13 8 10 31 a Subtotal 25 9 1 35 16 9 10 35 Total 806 210 5 1,021 377 319 325 1,021 a/ Some waterbodies would be crossed at more than one location. This table accounts for each crossing of all affected waterbodies.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Source Water Protection Areas within 0.25 Mile of the Mountain Valley Project Distance to Intake from State/Feature Nearest MP Pipeline (feet) West Virginia Burnsville Public Supply District 67.066.9 49,000 Craigsville Public Supply District 110.02 3,600 Summersville Public Supply 119.03 46,000 District Big Bend Public Supply District 170.6171.4 19,800 Red Sulphur Public Supply District 195.34.5 41,000 Sources: WVDHHR, 2015; VDH ODW, 2015

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-4 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Public Water Supply Intakes within Three Miles of the Mountain Valley Project Distance/Direction to Construction Right- State/ Surface Water Nearest MP of-way West Virginia Jones Run Creek 15.43 0.5 mile north Lower Dog Run 23.78 1.0 mile west Gauley River 109.69 0.2 mile west Panther Creek/Impoundment/Jim’s Branch 116.9117.2 1.8 miles northeast Panther Creek/Impoundment/Jim’s Branch 120.47 1.3 miles east Panther Creek/Impoundment/Jim’s Branch 120.58 0.3 mile east Greenbrier River 172.09 1.4 miles west Rich Creek Spring (Source of Rich Creek) 194.59 0.3 mile west Virginia WVWA Spring Hollow Reservoir 234.4 0.8 mile east Rocky Mount Intake 262.2 0.1 mile northeast Chatham Cherrystone Creek Intake 297.1 2.2 miles southwest

1 of 1 TABLE 4.3.2-7 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route) National Rivers Inventory Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project State/ County Waterbody Crossing Method Nearest MP Eligibility Value West Virginia Webster Left Fork Holly River Dry Open-cut 81.76 S Webster Elk River Wet Open-cut 87.34 O Summers Greenbrier River Wet Open-cut 171.40.6 S, R, G, F, H Virginia Montgomery Craig Creek Dry Open-cut 219.58.2 R, G, H, C Note: No NRI waterbodies would be crossed by the EEP. Source: NPS, 2009 Eligibility Values: S-Scenery; R-Recreation; G-Geology; F-Fish; W-Wildlife; P-Prehistory; H-History; C-Cultural; O-Other (including, but not limited to, hydrology, paleontology, and botany resources)

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-8 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project in Areas of Shallow Bedrock State/County MP(s) Waterbody Name Flow Type

West Virginia Wetzel 0.50, 0.1 UNT/North Fork Fishing CreekUNT Ephemeral, Intermittent to Mobley Run Wetzel 0.72.2 North Fork Fishing CreekUNT to Perennial Fallen Timber Run Wetzel 2.3, 2.86.7 UNT/ Fallen Timber to Stout Run Ephemeral, Intermittent, Perennial Wetzel 2.47.3 Fallen TimberUNT to Sams Run PerennialEphemeral Wetzel 5.1, 5.57.7 Price RunUNT to South Fork Fishing PerennialIntermittent Creek WetzelHarrison 5.1, 5.5, 5.612.2 UNT/Price to Goose Run Intermittent WetzelHarrison 6.6,6.713.4 UNT/Stout Run to Big Elk Creek IntermittentEphemera l WetzelHarrison 7.318.8 UNT/Sams to Rockcamp Run Ephemeral WetzelHarrison 7.721.6 UNT/South Fork Fishing CreekUNT Intermittent to Grass Run WetzelHarrison 8.021.7 SamsGrass Run PerennialIntermittent WetzelHarrison 22.4, 22.8.8, 8.9 UNT/Manion to Indian Run Ephemeral, Intermittent, Perennial WetzelHarrison 8.928.4, 29.3 ManionUNT to Raccoon Run Ephemeral, Perennial Harrison 11.330.9 Right Fork Big Elk CreekUNT to Halls PerennialEphemeral Run HarrisonDoddri 12.1, 12.232.7 UNT/Goose Run to Traugh Fork Intermittent dge HarrisonDoddri 12.234.1, 34.3, Goose RunUNT to Big Issac Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent dge 34.4, 34.5, 34.6, 34.7, 34.8 Harrison 13.4, 13.837.9, UNT/Big Elk to Kincheloe Creek Ephemeral 38.1 HarrisonLewis 15.3, 15.440.0, UNT/Jones Creek to Smoke Camp PerennialEphemeral, 40.1, 41.9 Run Intermittent HarrisonLewis 15.441.8 UNT/Little Tenmile Creek Smoke Ephemeral Camp Run HarrisonLewis 15.542.0 Little Tenmile CreekUNT to Smoke Perennial Camp Run HarrisonLewis 15.643.4 UNT Jake Runto Right Fork Freemans Ephemeral, Intermittent Creek HarrisonLewis 17.844.6 Little Rockcamp RunUNT to Fink PerennialEphemeral Creek

1 of 10 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-8 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project in Areas of Shallow Bedrock State/County MP(s) Waterbody Name Flow Type HarrisonLewis 1845.6, 46.7, Rockcamp RunUNT to Left Fork PerennialEphemeral, 46.8, 18.9 Freemans Creek Intermittent HarrisonLewis 18.8, 18.947.7 UNT/Rockcamp Run to Leading Creek Ephemeral HarrisonLewis 20.951.0, 51.1 GrassUNT to Laurel Run PerennialEphemeral HarrisonLewis 21.751.9 UNT/Grass Run to Cove Lick Intermittent, Perennial HarrisonLewis 22.4, 22.5, 22.6, UNT/Indian to Rock Run Ephemeral, 23.153.2 Intermittent HarrisonLewis 2358.8, 59.1, 60.0 UNT to Indian RunFork Intermittent, Perennial HarrisonLewis 30.959.5 UNT/Halls to Sugar Camp Run Ephemeral, Perennial HarrisonLewis 31.460.0 CoburnUNT to Indian Fork PerennialEphemeral HarrisonLewis 3160.4 UNT/Coben ForkThreelick Run Ephemeral, IntermittentPerennial Lewis 60.4 UNT to Threelick Run Ephemeral Lewis 61.4, 61.6, 61.8, UNT to Second Big Run Ephemeral 61.9, 62.0 Lewis 62.5, 62.6 UNT to Oil Creek Ephemeral Lewis 63.1 UNT to Crooked Run Intermittent Lewis 65.3 UNT to Clover Fork Ephemeral Braxton 67.5 UNT to Barbecue Run Intermittent Braxton 68.5 Barbecue Run Perennial Braxton 68.5 UNT to Barbecue Run Ephemeral Braxton 70.0, 70.3 UNT to Little Knawl Creek Ephemeral Braxton 74.0, 74.7 UNT to Elliott Run Intermittent Braxton 74.8, 75.2 UNT to Little Kanawha River Ephemeral, Intermittent Braxton 75.4 UNT to Granny Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent Braxton 76.4 UNT to England Run Ephemeral Braxton 77.4, 78.5 UNT to Laurel Run Ephemeral, Intermittent Webster 80.8, 82.0, 82.1 UNT to Left Fork Holly River Ephemeral, Intermittent Webster 81.0 UNT to Mudlick Run Ephemeral Webster 82.1 UNT to Left Fork Holly River Perennial Webster 82.6, 82.7 UNT to Oldlick Creek Ephemeral, Perennial Webster 84.1, 84.6, 84.7 Narrows Run Perennial Webster 84.2 Right Fork Holly Creek Perennial Webster 84.5, 84.6, 84.7, UNT to Narrows Run Ephemeral, Intermittent 84.9, 85.5, 86.3, 86.5, 86.6 Webster 88.5, 89.7, 90.2, UNT to Houston Run Ephemeral, Perennial 90.5, 90.8 Webster 90.1 UNT to Bear Run Ephemeral Webster 90.2, 90.7 UNT to Houston Run Intermittent Webster 90.3, 90.7 Houston Run Perennial Webster 93.0 Lower Laurel Fork Perennial Braxton 93.3, 93.4 UNT to Coon Creek Ephemeral

2 of 10 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-8 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project in Areas of Shallow Bedrock State/County MP(s) Waterbody Name Flow Type Webster 93.4 UNT to Camp Creek Intermittent Webster 97.7, 97.8, 97.9 UNT to Amos Run Ephemeral, Intermittent Webster 102.4 UNT to Little Glade Run Perennial Webster 102.7, 103.1 UNT to Laurel Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent Webster 103.2, 103.3, UNT to Williams Branch Ephemeral, Intermittent, 103.4 Perennial Webster 104.1, 104.6, UNT to Birch River Ephemeral, Perennial 104.8 Webster 105.9, 106.8 UNT to Meadow Fork Intermittent Webster, 109.2, 109.3, UNT to Gauley River Intermittent, Ephemeral, Nicholas 109.5, 109.6 Perennial Nicholas 111.3 UNT to Barn Run Perennial Nicholas 112.4 UNT to Rockcamp Run Perennial Nicholas 112.5 UNT to Cherry Run Intermittent Nicholas 114.2, 114.4, UNT to Big Beaver Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent, 114.5, 114.6, Perennial 114.8, 115.5, 115.7 Nicholas 116.1, 116.4 UNT to Granny Run Ephemeral, Intermittent Nicholas 116.7 Granny Run Perennial Nicholas 117.0, 117.3 UNT to Big Run Intermittent, Perennial Nicholas 118.1 UNT to Gauley River Perennial Nicholas 119.2, 121.1 UNT to Little Laurel Creek Ephemeral Nicholas 119.4 UNT to Gauley River Intermittent Nicholas 119.4, 121.7 UNT to Little Laurel Creek Intermittent Nicholas 121.7 UNT to Morris Fork Perennial Nicholas 122.4 UNT to Skelt Run Ephemeral Nicholas 122.6, 122.7 UNT to Deer Creek Ephemeral Nicholas 122.7, 122.8 UNT to Jims Creek Ephemeral Nicholas 124.3 Riley Branch Perennial Nicholas 125.0, 126.7, 127, UNT to Hominy Creek Ephemeral 127.2, 127.8 Nicholas 125.3, 126.9, UNT to Hominy Creek Intermittent 127.2, 130.8, 130.9, 131.5, 131.8 Nicholas 125.9 Bowen Run Perennial Nicholas 125.9 UNT to Bowen Run Ephemeral, Intermittent Nicholas 127.1, 131.4 UNT to Hominy Creek Perennial Nicholas 127.2 UNT to Brushy Meadow Creek Intermittent Webster 132.7 UNT to Hominy Creek Intermittent Greenbrier 137.1, 137.4, UNT to Meadow Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent, 138.1, 138.7, Perennial 138.8, 139.4, 139.7, 140.6, 140.7, 140.8

3 of 10 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-8 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project in Areas of Shallow Bedrock State/County MP(s) Waterbody Name Flow Type Greenbrier 142.8, 143.3, UNT to Meadow River Intermittent 150.2, 156.4 Greenbrier 143.4, 150.2, UNT to Meadow River Ephemeral 156.6 Greenbrier 143.9 UNT to Meadow River Perennial Greenbrier 145.4, 145.8, UNT to Little Sewell Creek Intermittent 146.7, 148.1, 148.2, 148.3, 148.4 Greenbrier 145.9, 147.0 UNT to Little Sewell Creek Perennial Greenbrier 147.9, 148.0 UNT to Boggs Creek Intermittent, Perennial Greenbrier 148.7 UNT to Little Sewell Creek Ephemeral Greenbrier 149.2, 149.6 UNT to Boggs Creek Ephemeral Fayette 153.9, 154.1, UNT to Buffalo Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent 154.3 Greenbrier 155.2 UNT to Morris Fork Perennial Summers 158.5, 159.0 UNT to Red Spring Branch Intermittent Summers 160.0, 160.1, UNT to Patterson Creek Ephemeral 160.2 Summers 160.5 Red Spring Branch Ephemeral Summers 160.9 UNT to Red Spring Branch Ephemeral Summers 161.0, 161.4, UNT to Lick Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent 161.5, 161.7, 162.2 Summers 161.6 Lick Creek Intermittent Summers 165.1, 165.2 UNT to Hungard Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent Summers 165.6, 165.9, UNT to Stonelick Branch Ephemeral 166.0 Summers 165.7 Stonelick Branch Intermittent Summers 168.5 UNT to Hungard Creek Perennial Summers 169.1 UNT to Righthand Fork Hungard Creek Ephemeral Summers 170.3, 171.1, UNT to Greenbrier River Ephemeral, Intermittent, 171.3 Perennial Summers 171.6, 171.7 UNT to Kelly Creek Ephemeral, Perennial Summers 172.3 UNT to Keller Creek Intermittent Summers, 173.3, 175.9, UNT to Wind Creek Ephemeral, Perennial Monroe 176.2 Monroe 175.9 Wind Creek Perennial Monroe 176.1 UNT to Blue Lick Intermittent, Perennial Monroe 176.5, 176.6, UNT to Stoney Creek Intermittent, Perennial 177.1, 177.2 Monroe 178.9 UNT to Little Stony Creek Ephemeral, Perennial Monroe 181.9 Indian Creek Perennial Monroe 182.4, 183.2, UNT to Hans Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent 184.4, 186.3, 187.0, 188.6,

4 of 10 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-8 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project in Areas of Shallow Bedrock State/County MP(s) Waterbody Name Flow Type 189.0, 189.1, 190.1 Monroe 187.5, 187.6, UNT to Blue Lick Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent 187.9, 189.9 Monroe 190.0, 190.1 UNT to Hans Creek Perennial Monroe 190.7, 190.8 UNT to Dry Creek Ephemeral Monroe 193.6, 193.7 UNT to Painter Run Intermittent Giles 195.8 UNT to Kimballton Branch Ephemeral, Perennial Giles 196.9 UNT to New River Ephemeral, Intermittent Giles 198.5 UNT to Curve Branch Intermittent Giles 198.8 Clendennin Creek Perennial Giles 198.8 UNT to Clendennin Creek Perennial Giles 201.0, 201.1, UNT to Dry Branch Ephemeral, Perennial 201.6, 201.7 Giles 203.4, 203.5 UNT to Little Stony Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent Giles 203.7, 203.8, UNT to Doe Creek Ephemeral 204.2, 204.3 Giles 207.4 UNT to Sinking Creek Ephemeral Montgomery 218.3, 218.5 UNT to Craig Creek Ephemeral, Perennial Montgomery 220.0, 220.1 UNT to Mill Creek Perennial Montgomery 220.1 Mill Creek Perennial Montgomery 224.2 Dry Run Perennial Montgomery 224.5 UNT to Dry Run Ephemeral Montgomery 225.7, 225.8, UNT to North Fork Roanoke River Ephemeral 225.9, 230.1 Montgomery 225.8, 230.1 North Fork Roanoke River Perennial Montgomery 226.2, 226.3 UNT to North Fork Roanoke River Intermittent, Perennial Montgomery 227.5, 227.7, UNT to Flatwoods Branch Ephemeral, Intermittent 228.0 Montgomery 228.1 Flatwoods Branch Intermittent Montgomery 228.7, 228.8, UNT to Bradshaw Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent 229.6, 230.2, 230.4 Montgomery, 232.3, 232.4, UNT to Roanoke River Ephemeral, Intermittent Roanoke 233.8 Montgomery 233.8 Roanoke River Perennial Montgomery 234.2 UNT to South Fork Roanoke River Perennial Montgomery 235.1 UNT to Indian Run Ephemeral Montgomery, 235.6, 235.7, UNT to Roanoke River Ephemeral, Roanoke 236.1, 237.7 Intermittent, Perennial Roanoke 238.8, 239.5, UNT to Bottom Creek Intermittent, Perennial 239.6 Roanoke 239.7 Bottom Creek Perennial

5 of 10 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-8 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project in Areas of Shallow Bedrock State/County MP(s) Waterbody Name Flow Type Franklin 244.5, 245.2 UNT to Green Creek Intermittent Franklin 244.8 Green Creek Perennial Franklin 247.4 North Fork Blackwater River Perennial Franklin 249.7, 249.9, UNT to North Fork Blackwater River Ephemeral, 250.0, 250.2, Intermittent, Perennial 250.4 Franklin 252.0, 253.8, UNT to Little Creek Ephemeral, 253.9, 254.6 Intermittent, Perennial Franklin 256.9, 257.3, UNT to Teels Creek Ephemeral, 257.7, 258.8, Intermittent, Perennial 259.6 Franklin 262.0, 263.9, UNT to Blackwater River Ephemeral, 264.3, 264.8, Intermittent, Perennial 273.7 Franklin 266.1, 266.2 UNT to Maggodee Creek Intermittent, Perennial Franklin 271.4 UNT to Poplar Camp Creek Intermittent, Perennial Franklin 274.6, 275, UNT to Jacks Creek Intermittent, Perennial 275.1, 275.2, 275.4, 276.0, 276.4 Franklin 277.0 UNT to Little Jacks Creek Perennial Franklin 277.1 Little Jacks Creek Perennial Franklin 277.8 Turkey Creek Perennial Franklin 277.9 UNT to Turkey Creek Ephemeral Franklin 278.6 Polecat Creek Perennial Franklin 278.9, 279.0 UNT to Owens Creek Intermittent Franklin 279.3 Owens Creek Intermittent Franklin 279.5 Strawfield Creek Perennial Franklin 279.8 UNT to Parrot Branch Intermittent Franklin 280.2 Parrot Branch Perennial Franklin 280.9 UNT to Jonnikin Creek Intermittent Pittsylvania 294.0 UNT to Pole Bridge Branch Ephemeral UNT = Unnamed tributary Source: USDA, 2016 (Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2016. Gridded Soil Survey Geographic (gSSURGO) by State, Tabular and vector digital dataset. Available online at: https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed March 29, 2016).

TABLE 4.3.2-8 (continued)

Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project in Areas of Shallow Bedrock State/County MP(s) Waterbody Name Flow Type Harrison 32.5, 32.6 Tenmile Creek Intermittent

6 of 10 TABLE 4.3.2-8 (continued)

Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project in Areas of Shallow Bedrock State/County MP(s) Waterbody Name Flow Type Harrison 32.7 UNT/ Tenmile Creek Intermittent Doddridge 34.1, 34.3, 34.4, UNT/Big Isaac Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent 34.5, 34.6, 34.7, 34.8 Doddridge 34.9 UNT/Laural Run Ephemeral, Intermittent

Doddridge 35.0 Laurel Run Perennial Harrison, 37.9, 38.1, 38.2 UNT/Kincheloe Creek Ephemeral, Perennial Lewis Lewis 39.5 UNT/Sand Fork Ephemeral, Intermittent, Perennial Lewis 39.9, 41.8, 41.9, UNT/Smoke Camp Run Intermittent 42.0 Lewis 40.0, 42.0 Smoke Camp Run Perennial

Lewis 40.0 UNT/Smoke Camp Run Intermittent Lewis 42.7, 43.2 Right Fork Freemans Creek Perennial

Lewis 44.5, 45.0 UNT/Fink Creek Ephemeral Lewis 44.8 Fink Creek Perennial Lewis 45.9, 46.6, 46.7, UNT/Left Fork Freemans Creek Ephemeral 46.8 Lewis 46.0 Left Fork Freemans Creek Perennial Lewis 47.7, 48.0 UNT/Leading Creek Ephemeral Lewis 48.1 Leading Creek Perennial Lewis 51.0, 51.2 UNT/Laurel Run Ephemeral Lewis 51.2 Laurel Run Perennial Lewis 52.4 UNT/Cove Lick Ephemeral, Intermittent

Lewis 52.4 Cove Lick Perennial

Lewis 53.2 UNT/Rock Run Ephemeral

Lewis 54.1 Rock Run Perennial Lewis 55.2 Sand Fork Ephemeral Lewis 58.6, 60.1 Indian Fork Perennial Lewis 58.7, 58.8, 60.0 UNT/Indian Fork Intermittent Lewis 59.5 UNT/Bens Run Ephemeral, Perennial Lewis 60.2 UNT/Threelick Run Ephemeral Lewis 61.3, 61.4, 61.8, UNT to Second Big Run Ephemeral, Intermittent, 61.9, 62.0 Perennial

Lewis 61.8 Second Big Run Perennial Lewis 62.3 Oil Creek Perennial Lewis 62.5, 62.6, 62.7 UNT/Oil Creek Ephemeral, Lewis 63.1 UNT/Crooked Creek Intermittent, Perennial Lewis 65.3, 65.5, 65.6 UNT/Clover Fork Ephemeral, Perennial

7 of 10 TABLE 4.3.2-8 (continued)

Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project in Areas of Shallow Bedrock

State/County MP(s) Waterbody Name Flow Type Lewis 65.6 Clover Fork Perennial Lewis 71.8, 72.3 UNT/Falls Run Intermittent, Perennial Lewis 74.0, 74.1 UNT/Elliott Run Intermittent, Perennial Lewis 74.8, 77.7, 77.5, UNT/Little Kanawha River Intermittent 77.7, 78.5

Lewis 74.9 Elliott Run Perennial Braxton 75.6 Coplin Run Perennial Nicholas 114.2, 114.4, UNT/Big Beaver Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent, 114.5, 114.6, Perennial 114.8, 115.1, 155.3, 115.5, 115.7 Nicholas 116.1 UNT/Granny Run Ephemeral, Intermittent Nicholas 122.4, 122.6 UNT/Skelt Run Ephemeral, Intermittent Nicholas 122.5, 122.6, UNT/Deer Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent 122.7 Nicholas 122.7, 122.8 UNT/Jims Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent Nicholas 126.5, 130.6, UNT/Hominy Creek Intermittent, Perennial 130.7, 130.8, 132.0 Nicholas 126.5 Hominy Creek Perennial Nicholas 130.1 Sugar Branch Perennial Greenbrier 145.8, 145.9, UNT/Little Sewell Creek Intermittent, Perennial 148.1, 148.3, 148.4 Greenbrier 150.2, 150.3, UNT/Meadow River Ephemeral, Intermittent 156.4 Summers 158.5 UNT/Red Spring Branch Intermittent Summers 160.0 UNT/Patterson Creek Ephemeral Summers 160.5 Red Spring Branch Ephemeral Summers 160.9, 161.0, UNT/Lick Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent 161.4, 161.5, 161.6, 161.7 Summers 161.6 Lick Creek Intermittent Summers 171.6, 171.7, UNT/Kelly Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent 172.3 Summers 171.8 Kelly Creek Perennial Monroe 178.9, 179.1, UNT/Little Stony Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent 179.2, 179.5, 179.6 Monroe 187.9, 189.9, UNT/Blue Lick Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent

Monroe 190.7 UNT/Dry Creek Ephemeral Monroe 193.6, 193.7 UNT/Painter Run Intermittent Monroe 193.6 Painter Run Perennial

8 of 10 TABLE 4.3.2-8 (continued)

Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project in Areas of Shallow Bedrock State/County MP(s) Waterbody Name Flow Type

Virginia Giles 204.0, 204.2 UNT/Doe Creek Ephemeral Giles 206.3, 206.5, UNT/Sinking Creek Ephemeral, Perennial 206.6, 206.7, 207.2, 207.3, 207.4 Montgomery 218.6 Craig Creek Perennial Montgomery 218.6 UNT/Craig Creek Perennial Montgomery 220.0, 220.7, UNT/North Fork Roanoke River Ephemeral, Intermittent, 220.8, 223.2, Perennial 225.9, 226.0, 226.2, 226.3 Montgomery 223.9 Mill Creek Perennial Montgomery 225.8 North Fork Roanoke River Perennial

Montgomery Montgomery 227.7, 227.9, UNT/Flatwoods Branch Ephemeral, Intermittent, 228.0, 228.1, Perennial 228.2 Montgomery 228.1 Flatwoods Branch Perennial Montgomery 228.6, 228.7, UNT/Bradshaw Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent 228.8, 229.4, 229.5, 229.6

Montgomery 229.6 Bradshaw Creek Perennial Montgomery 230.1 North Fork Roanoke River Perennial Montgomery 232.5 UNT/North Fork Roanoke River Perennial Montgomery 232.7, 234.3, UNT/ Roanoke River Ephemeral 236.1 Montgomery 234.7, 235.5, UNT/Cove Hollow Ephemeral, Intermittent 235.7 Roanoke 237.7 UNT/Dry Hollow Intermittent

Roanoke 238.8 UNT/Bottom Creek Intermittent, Perennial Franklin 244.5, 244.8, UNT/Green Creek Intermittent, Perennial 245.1, 245.2 Franklin 248.6, 249.5, UNT/North Fork Blackwater River Ephemeral, Intermittent, 249.7, 249.9, Perennial 250.0, 250.3, 250.4 Franklin 247.3 North Fork Blackwater River Perennial

Franklin 253.0, 260.8 Little Creek Perennial Franklin 254.6, 255.7, UNT/Little Creek Intermittent 260.8 Franklin 256.7, 256.9, Teels Creek Perennial 259.3 Franklin 257.9, 258.3, UNT/Teels Creek Perennial 258.8, 259.6

9 of 10 TABLE 4.3.2-8 (continued)

Waterbodies Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project in Areas of Shallow Bedrock

State/County MP(s) Waterbody Name Flow Type Franklin 262.2, 262.4, UNT/Blackwater River Intermittent, Perennial 262.5 Franklin 266.1, 266.2, UNT/Maggodee Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent, 266.3 Perennial Franklin 271.4, 271.6 UNT/Poplar Camp Creek Intermittent, Perennial Franklin 274.6, 274.9, UNT/Jacks Creek Ephemeral, Perennial 275.0, 275.2, 276.4 Franklin 276.7 UNT/Little Jacks Creek Ephemeral, Intermittent UNT = Unnamed tributary Source: USDA, 2015

10 of 10 TABLE 4.3.2-9 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route) FEMA 100-year Floodplains Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project and Equitrans Expansion Project Project/State/County Floodplain Waterbody Flood Zone MP Mountain Valley Project

West Virginia Harrison Little Tenmile Creek AE 15.45 Doddridge Laurel Run AE 34.85.0 Webster Camp Creek A 93.01 Franklin Blackwater River AE 264.92.4 Source : FEMA, 2015 Flood Zone A = Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event generally determined using approximate methodologies. Flood Zone AE = Areas subject to inundation by the 1-percent-annual-chance flood event determined by detailed methods.

1 of 1 TABLE 4.3.2-10 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route) Hydrostatic Test Water Sources and Discharge Locations for the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Proposed Water Source Proposed Test Water Discharge Location Required Proposed Segment/Facility Start Proposed Volume End MP Water MP Watershed MP Watershed Discharge Name MP Water (gallons) (gallons) Month

Mountain Valley Project 01A 0.0 12.12 4,367,359 Reuse from Fishing 0.0 Fishing 4,367,359 Oct/Nov 2017 Test Section Creek Creek 1B 01B 12.12 25.89 4,904,330 25.96.0 Salem Fork Tenmile 12.12 Tenmile 536,970 Creek Creek Creek 02A 25.89 41.13 5,512,896 25.96.0 Salem Fork Tenmile 25.89 Tenmile Creek Creek Creek

02B 41.13 47.98.0 2,398,468 Reuse from 41.13 Middle West 3,114,428 Oct/Nov 2017 Test Section Fork River 2A 03A 47.98.0 65.45 6,264,655 74.89 Little Leading 47.98.0 Leading 2,398,468 Kanawha Creek Creek River 03B 65.45 77.56 4,331,561 Reuse from 65.45 Upper Little 1,933,094 Oct/Nov 2017 Test Section Kanawha 3A 04A 77.56 87.67 3,615,601 Reuse from 77.13 Upper Little 7,947,162 Test Section Kanawha 4B 04B 87.67 104.97 6,085,665 87.34 Elk River Middle Elk 87.67 Middle Elk 2,470,064 Oct/Nov 2017 River River 05A 104.97 120.41 5,512,896 120.30 Little Laurel Birch Creek 104.97 Birch Creek Creek 05B 120.41 128.17.8 2,756,448 Reuse from 120.41 Outlet 2,756,448 Oct/Nov 2017 Test Section Gauley River 5A

1 of 3 TABLE 4.3.2-10 (continued)

Hydrostatic Test Water Sources and Discharge Locations for the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Proposed Water Source Proposed Test Water Discharge Location Required Proposed Segment/Facility Proposed Volume Start MP End MP Water MP Watershed MP Watershed Discharge Name Water (gallons) (gallons) Month

06A 128.17.8 144.03.7 5,691,886 143.7 Meadow Hominy 128.17.8 Hominy Creek 2,756,448 River Creek 06B 144.03.7 154.85 3,866,187 Reuse from 144.03.7 Meadow 1,825,699 Oct/Nov Test River 2017 Section 6A 07A 154.85 171.40.6 5,763,483 170.6 Greenbrier Meadow 154.85 Meadow 3,866,187 River Rive River 07B 171.40.6 182.71.8 4,009,379 Reuse from 171.40.6 Wolf Creek – 5,763,483 Oct/Nov Test Greenbrier 2017 Section 7A River 08A 182.71.8 191.90 3,293,419 Reuse from 182.71.8 Indian Creek 3,293,419 Test Section 8B 08B 191.90 205.84.7 4,904,330 181.9 Indian East River 191.90 East River – 1,610,911 Oct/Nov Creek – New New River 2018 River 09A 205.84.7 219.58.1 4,796,936 Reuse from 205.84.7 Sinking Creek 4,796,936 Test – New River Section 9B 09B 219.58.1 235.84.0 5,691,886 233.8 Roanoke Upper 219.58.1 Upper Craig 894,951 Oct/Nov River Craig Creek 2018 Creek 10A 235.84.0 249.67.1 4,689,542 262.8 Blackwater 235.84.0 Mason Creek- River Roanoke River 10B 249.67.1 259.46.9 3,508,207 Reuse from 249.67.1 Upper 1,181,335 Test Blackwater Section 10A 10C 259.46.9 264.92.7 2,076,286 Reuse from 259.46.9 Upper 1,431,921 Oct/Nov Test Blackwater 2018 Section 10B 11A 264.92.7 267.85.2 894,951 Reuse from 264.92.7 Upper Test Blackwater Section 11B 11B 267.85.2 282.879.9 5,262,310 262.1 Blackwater Upper 267.85.2 Upper 715,961 River Blackwater Blackwater 2 of 3 TABLE 4.3.2-10 (continued)

Hydrostatic Test Water Sources and Discharge Locations for the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Proposed Water Source Proposed Test Water Discharge Location Required Proposed Segment/Facility Proposed Volume Start MP End MP Water MP Watershed MP Watershed Discharge Name Water (gallons) (gallons) Month 11C 282.879.9 295.52.6 4,546,350 Reuse from 282.879.9 Upper Pigg 1,539,315 Test River Section 11B 11D 295.52.6 303.471.0 3,007,034 Reuse from 295.52.6 Cherrystone 3,007,034 Oct/Nov Test Creek – 2018 Section Banister River 11C Equitrans Expansion Project H-158 0 0.2 7,085 N/A Municipal N/A - Lower 7,085 Nov 2017 Monongahela H-305 0 0.1 12,043 N/A Municipal N/A - Lower 12,043 Nov 2017 Monongahela H-316 0 3.0 551,423 N/A Municipal N/A - Lower 551,423 Nov 2017 Monongahela H-318 0 0.6 44,666 N/A Municipal N/A - Lower 44,666 Nov 2017 Monongahela H-318 0.6 4.23 304,613 N/A Municipal N/A - Lower 304,613 Nov 2017 Monongahela H-319 0 <0.1 1,900 N/A Municipal N/A - Little 1,900 Nov 2017 Muskingum- Middle Island M-80 0 <0.1 1,810 N/A Municipal N/A - Lower 1,810 Nov 2017 Monongahela Mobley Tap N/A N/A 1,174 N/A Municipal N/A - Little 1,174 Nov. 2017 Muskingum- Middle Island Redhook N/A N/A 25,000 N/A Municipal N/A - Lower 25,000 Nov 2017 Compressor Monongahela Station Webster N/A N/A 1,565 N/A Municipal N/A - Little 1,565 Nov 2017 Interconnect Muskingum- Middle Island Note: Equitrans would either pump hydrostatic test water to the next segment for testing or discharge hydrostatic test water to uplands. N/A = Not Applicable

3 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-11 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Proposed Waterbody Crossings in the Jefferson National Forest for the Mountain Valley Project a/ Waterbody Name Project MP Flow Type FERC Classification Kimballton Branch 195.8 Perennial Intermediate UNT/Kimballton Branch 195.8 Perennial Minor UNT/ to Kimballton Branch 195.8196.7 Ephemeral Minor Curve Branch 196.9 Intermittent Minor UNT/ to Kimballton Branch 198.0196.7 Ephemeral Minor UNT/Curve Branch 198.5 Intermittent Minor Clendennin Creek 198.8 Perennial Minor UNT/ to Clendennin Creek 1987.8 PerennialEphemeral Minor UNT/ to Clendennin Creek 198.9197.8 PerennialEphemeral Minor UNT/ to Clendennin Creek 198.9197.8 IntermittentEphemeral Minor UNT/ to Clendennin Creek 198.9197.8 Perennial Minor UNT/ to Clendennin Creek 198.9197.8 EphemeralPerennial Minor UNT/Clendennin CreekKimballton Branch 198.9197.8 EphemeralPerennial MinorIntermediate UNT/Clendennin Creek to Kimballton Branch 198.9197.8 EphemeralPerennial Minor UNT/Clendennin Creek to New River 198.9197.8 Ephemeral Minor UNT/ to New River 196.9197.8 Intermittent Minor UNT/Stony CreekCurve Branch 196.9197.8 Intermittent Minor UNT/Stony Creek to Curve Branch 197.48 EphemeralIntermittent Minor UNT/StonyClendennin Creek 197.58 EphemeralPerennial Minor UNT/StonyClendennin Creek 199.1197.8 EphemeralPerennial Minor UNT/CraigClendennin Creek 217.4197.8 IntermittentPerennial Minor UNT/ to Craig Creek 2178.8 Intermittent Minor UNT/ to Craig Creek 217.8219.1 Ephemeral Minor UNT/ to Craig Creek 218.3219.2 EphemeralIntermittent Minor UNT/ to Craig Creek 218.6219.9 Perennial Minor UNT/Craig Creek 218.6 Perennial Minor a/ All waterbodies listed in the table would be crossed using a dry open-cut method

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-12 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Mountain Valley Pipeline Locations Paralleling Waterbodies within 15 Feet Acres Within 15 State/ Waterbody Distance to feet of County Name MP Route (feet) Pipeline Site Specific Justification West Virginia

Webster UNT/Amos 97.9 12.2 0.001 Alignment follows contours up a Run steep slope and avoids existing ponds. Each drain contains subsidence issues, therefore following the spur ridge was the most desirable route. Wetzel UNT to Stout Run 6.6 4.8 0.012 Pipeline is routed to follow contours. Avoidance would require steep side- slope construction and risk subsidence issues. Lewis UNT to Second 61.2 10.1 0.003 Pipeline is routed to avoid steep Big Run slopes situated east and west of the current alignment. Stream avoidance in this particular area would add winch hill construction. Webster UNT to Houston 89.6 Crosses 0.022 Pipeline is routed to follow ridge top Run twice contours. Shifting North-East, or North-West would place the pipeline in side hill construction Webster UNT to Camp 93.1 12.6 0.004 Pipeline is routed to avoid Creek residences to the West, yet stay off the toe of slope found to the south- east to reduce side hill construction. Webster UNT/Amos 97.8 12.2 0.001 Alignment follows contours up a Run steep slope and avoids existing ponds. Each drain contains subsidence issues, therefore following the spur ridge was the most desirable route. Greenbrier UNT to Little 147.0 12.6 0.007 Pipeline alignment is routed to follow Sewell Creek top of contour from top of slope to bottom of slope between a residence to the east, and a residence to the west. Adjusting the pipeline west, or east would require winch hill construction immediately above an inhabited residence, decreasing public safety. Nicholas Skelt Run 122.2 8.8 0.001 Pipeline is routed to avoid homes and follow contours. There is a large rock high wall to the east, which prevents Mountain Valley from adjustment. Additionally, there is a school to the east; efforts were made to provide as much distance as possible between the route and the school.

1 of 2 DEIS TABLE 4.3.2-12 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Mountain Valley Pipeline Locations Paralleling Waterbodies within 15 Feet Virginia Roanoke UNT/Mill Creek 245.43 10.7 0.002 Pipeline is desktop routed to avoid .3 steep slopes to the north and south. Route surveying will be completed when access is granted. Roanoke UNT to Mill Creek 246.0 6.6 0.010 Pipeline is routed to avoid impacts to inhabited residences, as well as to ensure proper alignment for the conventional bore of Bent Mountain Road. Right of Way has been minimized to reduce impacts Franklin UNT to North 248.7 0 0.067 Pipeline was routed to follow Fork Blackwater contour. Work Space has been River minimized to reduce impacts.

Franklin Teels Creek 256.2 5.8 0.02 Pipeline is desktop routed to the side of an existing field. Route surveying will be completed when access is granted. Franklin UNT/Foul Ground 2268.9 PendingCro Pending0. Pending Creek 71.7 sses 017

Pittsylvania UNT/Rocky Creek 283.72 3.2 0.003 Routed to follow contour and cross 86.6 road. Right-of-way has been minimized to reduce impacts. UNT - Unnamed tributary Pending information will be provided in the final EIS.

2 of 2 DEIS TABLE 4.3.3-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Wetland Impacts Associated with the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Type/State a/ Construction (acres) b/ Operation (acres) b/ PEM Wetlands West Virginia 21.4115.76 8.385.66 Virginia 4.171.92 2.182.47 Pennsylvania 1.28 0.62 Total PEM Wetland Impacts 26.86 11.18 PSS Wetlands West Virginia 0.673 0.28 Virginia 1.490.67 0.741.21 Pennsylvania 0.0 0.0 Total PSS Wetland Impacts 2.12 1.02 PFO Wetlands West Virginia 4.688.04 1.851.21 Virginia 2.170.71 1.041.31 Pennsylvania 0.07 0.07 Total PFO Wetland Impacts 10.28 2.96 Total Wetland Impacts 39.26 15.16 a/ PEM = Palustrine Emergent; PSS = Palustrine Scrub-Shrub; PFO = Palustrine Forested (Cowardin et al., 1979). b/ Construction impacts include those within the operational footprint. Note: does not include updates to EEP.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.3.3-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Mountain Valley Project Wetland Impacts Total Wetland Area Crossing Total Wetland Area Affected During Length (feet) Affected During Operation State/Facility Type a/ b/ Construction (acres) c/ (acres) West Virginia PEM 5,337.34352.1 14.4411.92 6.145.66 Pipeline Facilities d/ PSS 193.4269.9 0.610.19 0.260.28 PFO 1,625.1916.3 4.513.81 1.781.21 Pipeline Facilities Subtotal 7,155.85538.3 19.5615.93 8.187.15 PEM N/A 0.001 0.001 Aboveground Facilities PSS N/A 0.00 0.00 PFO N/A 0.00 0.00 Aboveground Facilities N/A 0.001 0.001 Subtotal PEM N/A 6.793.84 0.002.19 Access Roads PSS N/A 0.030.48 0.002 PFO N/A 3.540.87 0.007 Access Roads Subtotal N/A 10.365.19 2.280.00 Yards PEM N/A 0.00 0.00 PSS N/A 0.00 0.00 PFO N/A 0.00 0.00 Yards Subtotal N/A 0.00 0.00 West Virginia Subtotal 5538.37,155.8 29.9321.11 10.477.15 Virginia PEM 291.02245.0 4.041.64 2.472.13 Pipeline Facilities PSS 271.91040.0 1.490.66 0.741.21 PFO 76.1967.9 2.170.67 1.041.31 Pipeline Facilities Subtotal 639.04252.9 2.977.70 3.914.99 PEM N/A 0.00 0.00 Aboveground Facilities PSS N/A 0.00 0.00 PFO N/A 0.00 0.00 Aboveground Facilities N/A 0.00 0.00 Subtotal PEM N/A 0.130.28 0.050.00 Access Roads PSS N/A 0.000.01 0.000.00 PFO N/A <0.010.04 0.00 Access Roads Subtotal N/A 0.130.33 0.050.00 PEM N/A 0.00 0.00 Yards PSS N/A 0.00 0.00 PFO N/A 0.00 0.00 Yards Subtotal N/A 0.00 0.00 Virginia Subtotal 639.04252.9 7.833.30 4.993.96 MVP Total 7,794.89791.2 37.7624.41 14.4312.14 a/ PEM = Palustrine Emergent; PSS = Palustrine Scrub-Shrub; PFO = Palustrine Forested (Cowardin et al., 1979). b/ N/A = wetlands not crossed by the centerline but within the construction workspace. c/ Construction impacts include those within the operational footprint, as well as those within temporary workspaces. d/ Pipeline facilities include the permanent right-of-way, temporary workspace, and additional temporary workspace.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.4.1-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Upland Vegetation Cover Types Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Miles Crossed Cover Type Common Vegetation Species MVP EEP Deciduous northern red oak (Quercus rubra), chestnut oak (Q. montana), 234.0206.6 3.8 Forest white oak (Q. alba), black oak (Q. velutina), scarlet oak (Q. coccinea), southern red oak (Q. falcata), post oak (Q. stellata), red maple (Acer rubrum), sugar maple (Acer saccharum), yellow buckeye (Aesculus flava), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), mockernut hickory (Carya tomentosa), shagbark hickory (C. ovata), white ash (Fraxinus americana), basswood (Tilia Americana), buckeye (Aesculus glabra), birches (Betula spp.), American elm (Ulmus Americana), eastern hop-hornbeam (Ostrya virginiana), spruce (Picea spp.), hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), and loblolly pine (P. taeda). Coniferous mountain pine (Pinus pungens), pitch pine (Pinus rigida), shortleaf 8.07.0 0.0 Forest pine, Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana), red pine (Pinus resinosa), and white pine (Pinus strobus). Mixed a mix of the above listed deciduous and coniferous tree species. 3.020.7 0.0 Forest Scrub-Shrub mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia), fetterbush (Pieris floribunda), 0.32.7 0.0 Land rhododendron (Rhododendron spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), huckleberries (Gaylussacia spp.), autumn olive (Elaeagnus umbellata), hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana), eastern hop- hornbeam, witch hazel (Hamamelis virginiana), balsam fir (Abies balsamea), dogwoods (Cornus spp.), and spicebush (Lindera benzoin). Herbaceous Includes natural to semi-natural areas of open grassland. 3.67.5 0.2 Grasslands orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata), poverty grass (Danthonia spicata), common hairgrass (Deschampsia flexuosa), red fescue (Festuca rubra), common velvet grass (Holcus lanatus), Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium vimineum), Kentucky blue grass (Poa pratensis), meadow false rye grass (Schedonorus pratensis), little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), white clover (Trifolium repens), wingstem (Verbesina alternifolia), giant ironweed (Veronia gigantea), and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). Palustrine black willow (Salix nigra), black elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), 0.3 <0.1 Forested red maple, green ash (Fraxinus pennsyvanica), ironwood (Carpinus Wetland carolinia), yellow birch, and American elm Palustrine black willow, black elderberry, green ash, spicebush, silky <0.10.2 <0.1 Scrub Shrub dogwood, sedges, false nettle (Boehmeria cylindrical), sensitive Wetland fern (Onoclea sensibilis), soft rush (Juncus effusus), Japanese stiltgrass, jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), and golden ragwort (Packera aurea). Palustrine jewelweed, Japanese stiltgrass, soft rush, dark green bulrush 1.11.2 0.1 Emergent (Scirpus atrovirens), false nettle, sensitive fern, wingstem Wetland (Verbesina alternifolia), woolgrass (Scirpus cyperinus), reed canary grass, various rushes and sedges.

1 of 1

DEIS TABLE 4.4.1-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Acres of Major Forest Community Types Within the Jefferson National Forest Affected by the Mountain Valley Project Major Forest Community Type Total Forest Acres Old Growth Acres Mixed Mesophytic and Western Mesophytic Forest 72.2 0 Dry-Mesic Oak Forest 6973.9 93.8 Dry and Dry-Mesic Oak-Pine Forest 510.7 0 Dry and Xeric Oak Forest; Woodland and Savanna 28.0 7.1 Conifer-Northern Hardwood 1.9 0 Xeric Pine and Pine-Oak Forest and Woodland 0.4 0 Total 81117.2 10.9

1 of 1

DEIS TABLE 4.4.2-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Vegetation Communities Affected by Construction and Operation of the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Wetland (forested, scrub- shrub, Upland Forest Upland Scrub-Shrub Upland Herbaceous emergent) b/ Total Const Oper Const Oper Const Oper Const Oper Const Oper Project/ State/ Component (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) MVP West Virginia Pipeline right-of-way 2,595.12,46 1,0054.27 0.629.2 0.310.9 28.741.3 11.617.8 0.510.1 0.36.4 2,624.92,54 1,066.91,03 1.3 1.9 9.5 ATWS 309.5237.6 0.0 0.25.1 0.0 5.08.4 0.0 0.411.2 0.0 315.1262.3 0.0 Aboveground Facilities d/ 79.90.0 17.621.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 79.80.0 1721.6 Access Roads 495.3411.5 128.4108.7 1.415.8 0.53.7 13.67.4 4.52.7 0.56.1 0.73 510.9440.8 133.6115.7 Yards 20.7118.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.12.9 0.0 0.04.7 0.0 21.7126.3 0.0 Cathodic Protection 5.03.0 2.71.6 0.0 0.0 3.90.1 2.10.0 0.80 0.00.4 8.93.9 4.82.0 West Virginia Subtotal 3,505.63,23 1,203.41,13 2.350.1 0.714.6 52.360.1 18.220.5 1.332.9 0.57.5 3,561.43,37 1,222.91,17 2.1 6.1 5.2 8.8 Virginia Pipeline right-of-way 1,050.41,00 431.8416.7 5.416.5 1.66.1 24.471.8 10.430.4 0.37.0 0.04.7 1,080.61,10 443.7457.9 5.5 0.7 ATWS 63.253.2 0.0 0.31.0 0.0 3.75.0 0.0 0.02.2 0.0 67.161.4 0.0 Aboveground Facilities d/ 5.90.0 2.40.0 0.0 0.00.3 0.0 0.02.1 0.0 0.0 6.00.0 2.4 Access Roads 152.5154.0 51.444.5 0.81 0.51 2.19.1` 0.41.6 0.30 0.00.1 154.6164.3 51.846.8 Yards 2.33.0 0.0 0.03.0 0.0 0.036.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.242.9 0.0 Cathodic Protection 0.30.2 0.12 0.0 0.0 1.50.0 0.80.0 0.0 0.0 1.80.2 1.00.1 Virginia Subtotal 1,274.61,21 485.8461.3 5.921.3 1.66.9 31.7113.7 11.634.1 0.39.5 0.04.8 1,312.41,36 499.0507.2 5.9 9.5 MVP Subtotal 4,780.24,44 1,689.21,59 8.1511.4 2.321.5 83.9173.8 29.954.6 1.642.4 0.614.3 4,874.14,74 1,721.81,68 8.0 7.4 4.7 6.0 EEP West Virginia Pipeline right-of-way 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.2 ATWS 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 Aboveground Facilities 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3

1 of 2 DEIS TABLE 4.4.2-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Vegetation Communities Affected by Construction and Operation of the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Wetland (forested, scrub- shrub, Upland Forest Upland Scrub-Shrub Upland Herbaceous emergent) b/ Total Const Oper Const Oper Const Oper Const Oper Const Oper Project/ State/ Component (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Access Roads 0.1 0.0 b/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Yards 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Cathodic Protection 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 West Virginia Subtotal 1.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.5 0.5 Pennsylvania Pipeline right-of-way 41.7 22.4 0.0 0.0 2.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 44.8 24.2 ATWS 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 21.6 0.0 Aboveground Facilities 4.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 Access Roads 3.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.8 Yards 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 Cathodic Protection 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 Pennsylvania Subtotal 72.7 27.9 0.0 0.0 3.3 2.0 1.4 0.7 77.3 30.6 EEP Subtotal 74.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 3.3 2.0 1.5 0.7 78.6 31.1 West Virginia Impacts 3,506.9 1,203.9 2.3 0.7 52.3 18.2 1.5 0.6 3,562.7 1223.4 Virginia Impacts 1,276.8 485.5 5.9 1.6 30.2 10.8 0.3 0.0 1,320.6 501.7 Pennsylvania Impacts 72.7 27.9 0.0 0.0 3.3 2.0 1.4 0.7 77.3 30.6 MVP-EEP Total 4,856.4 1,717.3 8.2 2.3 85.8 31.0 3.2 1.3 4,960.6 1,755.7 a/ Agriculture includes lands used for the cultivation of crops. Common crops in the area include corn, hay, soybeans, tobacco, and wheat. b/ Wetland numbers in this table derived from a database. Wetland impact estimates based on field delineations can be found in section 4.3.3 c/ Other lands include prior disturbed land utilized for commercial business, industry, or residential purposes. d/ Construction impacts associated with permanent aboveground facilities are included within the construction impacts for Yards and other ancillary features.

2 of 2 DEIS TABLE 4.4.2-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Core Forest Areas Affected by the Mountain Valley Project and Equitrans Expansion Project in West Virginia

Core Forest Area Ranking (acres) Medium Small Core Core (250 Large Core Edge Patch Perforated Total (acres) (<250 ac) – 500 ac) (>500 ac) Const. a/ 246.4261.6 13.012.0 803.8820.7 59.457.7 1.0 2,4274.61 3,547.73,580.6 Oper. b/ 78.84.7 77.74.6 256.3263.5 19.819.2 0.4 865.4872.1 1,224.21,238.6 a/ Based on a 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way. b/ Based on a 50-foot-wide permanent operational right-of-way.

1 of 1

DEIS TABLE 4.4.2-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Ecological Core Areas Affected by the Mountain Valley Project in Virginia Ecological Integrity Category (acres) General Moderate High Very High Outstanding Total (acres)

Const. a/ 383.0148.1 54.6199.3 167.8197.5 198.455.8 134.0350.5 937.8951.2 Oper. b/ 141.265.4 22.471.7 58.171.0 80.823.1 56.4118.4 358.9349.6 a/ Based on a 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way. b/ Based on a 50-foot-wide permanent operational right-of-way.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.6.1-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Restricted In-Stream Construction Windows for Fisheries of Special Concern Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project a/ Number of Restricted In-Stream Waterbodies Crossed State Fishery Type Construction Window by the MVP d/ WV September 15-March 31 64 Coldwater streams VA March 1 – June 30 1338 WV April 1 – June 30 1335 Warmwater streams VA April 15 – July 15 1 WV All mussels NA b/ 16 VA April 15 – June 15; 32 Long-term Freshwater August 15 – September brooders mussels 30; Short-term 12 May 15 – July 31 brooders WV April 1 – June 30 24 Snuffbox (warmwater stream); September 15 – March 1 Clubshell 31 (coldwater stream) VA Atlantic pigtoe May 15 – July 31 2 April 15 – June 15; 1 Green floater August 15 – September Threatened and 30 Endangered James 2 May 15 – July 31 Species Stream spinymussel Orangefin 225 March 15 – May 31 madtom Roanoke March 15 – June 30 412 logperch April 15 – June 15; Yellow August 15 – September 21 lampmussel 30 WV September 15 – March 415 Wild trout streams 31 VA October 1 – March 31 3512 VA Stocked trout streams c/ March 15 – May 15 23 a/ Restricted In-stream Construction Windows = Any span of time within time-of-year restrictions set forth by the COE’s 401 Water Quality Certification for streams crossed in WV and by the VDGIF time-of-year restrictions for warmwater streams, coldwater streams, or streams containing rare, threatened, or endangered species in VA. Updated numbers from those included in the draft EIS reflect new guidance from VDGIF that perennial tributaries will be assigned the same fishery type and time of year restriction as the receiving waterbody. b/ The West Virginia Mussel Survey Protocols (Clayton et al., 2015) do not specify restricted in-stream construction windows; surveys for mussels must be completed between May 1 and October 1; mussel relocations must occur within the same field season as surveys. c/ The MVP would not cross waterbodies in West Virginia containing stocked trout. d/ Total counts of streams crossed are listed per fishery type; some waterbodies may have multiple fishery types; therefore a sum the number of waterbodies listed in this column will be greater than the total number of waterbodies crossed by the MVP.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Land Use Types Affected by Construction and Operation of the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project (in acres) Forested/ Industrial/ Open Land Agricultural Woodland Commercial Residential Open Water Total Project/State/ Component Constr Oper Constr Oper Constr Oper Constr Oper Constr Oper Constr Oper Constr Oper

MOUNTAIN VALLEY PROJECT Virginia Pipeline Right-of- 76.070.5 31.329. 411.840 170.716 1,050.7 431.844 02.0 0.07 128.5 5.54.2 0.2 0.1 1,551.1 639.5653.8 Way 6 7.1 9.9 080.2 9.2 568.5 Additional 32.129.6 0.0 129106. 0.0 63.259. 0.0 0.05 0.0 5.61 0.0 0.0 0.0 230.12 0.0 Temporary 2 4 00.7 Workspace Aboveground 0.06 0.0 0.20 0.01 5.940.4 2.46 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.241.0 2.47 Facilities Access Roads 16.119.2 4.20 59.561.7 1311.1 152.51 51.446.7 0.09 0.04 6.4.5 3.1.6 0.10 0.0 234.62 71.863.9 72.0 58.3 Yards 4.0 0.0 27.9 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.8 0.0 Cathodic Protection 1.56 1.0.8 4.03.7 2.01.8 0.34 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.95 0.53 0.0 0.0 7.06.4 3.65 Virginia Subtotal 129.7125 36.334. 632.760 185.918 1,274.9 4985.8 0.84.1 0.1.2 28.621. 96.1 0.2 0.1 2,066.8 717.3723.9 .5 6 6.6 3.1 354.6 8 112.9 West Virginia Pipeline Right-of- 142.0120 61.554. 150.914 64.163.7 2,595.1 1,054.70 0.01.6 01.0 72.5 3.41.0 1.38 0.81.1 2,8896. 1,184.5190 Way .8 2 6.8 616.3 69.5 8 .4 Additional 73.370.0 0.0 116.685. 0.0 309.52 0.0 01.0 0.0 4.2.7 0.0 0.35 0.0 503.94 0.0 Temporary 8 98.7 58.7 Workspace Aboveground 716.0 2.35 1.23.5 0.0 79.988. 17.619.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 88108. 19.922.4 Facilities 5 0 Access Roads 10388.6 33.932. 4139.8 11.310.6 495.35 1289.4 0.02 0.02 73.2 1.75 0.50 0.0 6487.5 175.3173.6 0 15.7 Yards 19.527.7 0.0 63.054.9 0.0 20.730. 0.0 9.2.3 0.0 3.710.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 109.11 0.0 3 32.6 Cathodic Protection 3.97 2.1 2.81 1.20 5.02 2.79 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 12.011. 6.21 3 West Virginia Subtotal 349.2 99.8 376.1 76.6 3,505.5 1,203.4 2.3 0.0 23.0 5.3 2.2 0.8 4,258.3 1,385.9392 248.0 .6 MOUNTAIN VALLEY 478.9 136.1 1,008.8 262.5 4,780.4 1,689.2 3.1 0.1 51.5 14.4 2.4 0.9 6,325.1 2,103.2116 PROJECT SUBTOTAL 360.8 .5

1 of 2 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-1 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Land Use Types Affected by Construction and Operation of the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project (in acres) Forested/ Industrial/ Open Land Agricultural Woodland Commercial Residential Open Water Total Project/State/ Component Constr Oper Constr Oper Constr Oper Constr Oper Constr Oper Constr Oper Constr Oper

EQUITRANS EXPANSION PROJECT Pennsylvania Pipeline Right-of- 11.2 5.7 34.6 16.1 41.7 22.4 0.1 0.1 1.5 0.7 0.9 0.9 90.0 46.0 Way Additional 6.5 0.0 32.1 0.0 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.9 0.0 Temporary Workspace Aboveground 3.3 3.3 17.1 17.1 4.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 25.2 Facilities Access Roads 1.6 0.1 2.5 1.1 3.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 2.0 Yards 1.9 0.0 4.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 0.0 Cathodic 0.9 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 Protection Pennsylvania Subtotal 25.2 9.9 90.7 34.5 72.7 27.9 0.1 0.1 6.1 0.8 0.9 0.9 195.7 74.2 West Virginia Pipeline Right-of- 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 Way Additional 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 Temporary Workspace Aboveground 0.9 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.2 Facilities Access Roads 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 Yards 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 Cathodic 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Protection West Virginia Subtotal 2.3 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 1.5 EQUITRANS 27.5 11.0 90.7 34.5 74.0 28.4 0.1 0.1 6.1 0.8 0.9 0.9 199.3 75.7 EXPANSION SUBTOTALS Combined Project 506.4 147.1 1,099.5 297.0 4,854.4 1,717.6 3.2 0.3 57.6 15.2 3.3 1.8 6,524.4 2,178.9 Totals

2 of 2 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Land Use Types Affected by Construction and Operation of the Mountain Valley Project Aboveground Facilities (in acres)

Forested/ Industrial/ Open Land Agricultural Woodland Commercial Residential Open Water Total Project/State/ Component Constr. Oper. Constr. Oper. Constr. Oper. Constr. Oper. Constr. Oper. Constr. Oper. Constr. Oper.

Virginia M&R Station Transco 0.60.6 00.0 00.20 00.0 40.45.9 2.52.45 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 00.0 416.24 2.52.4 InterconnectTransco 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 40.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 5 Interconnect 0.0 0.3 0.0 Launcher and Receiver Sites Launcher and Receiver 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 Sites Virginia Totals 0.06 0.0 0.20 0.02 5.940.4 2.45 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.241.0 2.45

West Virginia Compressor Stations 3.711.1 1.8 0.0 0.0 20.325. 4.04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.036. 5.86.3 Bradshaw Station 4 5 1.30 0.0 10.0 0.0 18.815. 4.45.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.116. 4.45.6 Harris Station 5 5 0.05 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.729. 5.7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.729. 5.7.2 Stallworth Station 5 9 M&R Stations Mobley Interconnect 1.98 0.57 0.0 0.0 3.1.4 0.34 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.03.2 0.81.1 Sherwood Interconnect 0.08 0.0 0.09 0.0 7.110.3 2.01.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.112.0 2.01.1 WB Interconnect 0.09 0.0 0.2.6 0.0 6.04 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.29.9 1.2 716.0 2.35 1.23.5 0.0 79.988. 17.619. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 88108. 19.92 West Virginia Totals 5 9 0 2.4 Mountain Valley 7.016.6 2.35 1.43.5 0.02 85128. 20.022. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94.214 22.42 Project Aboveground 9 5 9.0 5.2 Totals

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Land Use Types Affected by Yards Used During Construction of the Mountain Valley Project (in acres)

State/Yard Type/ Cultivated Deciduous Developed, Developed, Developed, Developed, Emergent Pasture/ Total Site ID Crops Forest High Intensity Low Intensity Medium Intensity Open Space Herbaceous Wetlands Hay

Virginia MVP-PY-005 0.62 1.63 0.05 0.00 12.70 15.01 MVP-PY-006 1.65 1.51 0.46 4.00 15.21 22.84 Virginia Totals 2.28 3.14 0.51 4.00 27.91 37.85 West Virginia 0.000 0.645 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.032 0.000 0.000 0.677 MVP-AP-001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.151 0.000 0.000 0.151 MVP-AP-002 0.000 0.137 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.079 0.000 0.000 0.215 MVP-LOG-001 0.000 0.854 0.000 0.291 0.000 0.941 0.000 2.713 4.799 MVP-LY-001 5.264 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 14.116 19.380 MVP-LY-001A 0.000 16.136 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.428 0.000 0.188 17.753 MVP-LY-002 0.000 2.498 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.781 0.000 0.000 7.279 MVP-LY-003 0.000 0.000 3.620 3.234 0.889 1.133 0.000 0.000 8.876 MVP-LY-007 0.000 0.254 0.000 0.062 0.000 2.333 0.000 15.196 17.845 MVP-LY-013 0.000 0.063 0.000 3.467 0.010 2.176 0.000 0.000 5.717 MVP-LY-016 0.389 0.000 0.000 2.261 1.666 2.229 2.926 0.000 9.470 MVP-LY-017 2.859 0.000 0.000 0.862 0.000 0.985 0.000 1.006 5.712 MVP-LY-018 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.000 1.925 0.000 1.379 3.306 MVP-LY-021 0.000 0.006 0.000 0.157 3.054 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.217 MVP-LY-022 4.985 1.768 0.000 0.176 0.000 0.506 0.000 0.000 7.435 MVP-LY-023 0.000 0.901 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.908 0.000 4.676 6.485 MVP-LY-024 0.000 0.863 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.863 MVP-LY-025 0.000 0.027 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.882 0.022 2.170 4.101 MVP-RD-001 0.001 6.032 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.121 0.000 0.000 9.155 MVP=SA-001 0.000 0.078 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.101 0.000 0.000 0.179 West Virginia Totals 13.499 30.262 3.620 10.511 5.620 24.711 2.947 41.444 132.613 Mountain Valley 13.499 32.537 3.620 13.653 6.133 28.715 2.947 69.358 170.461 Project Totals

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-7 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Farms Growing Specialty Crops Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project

County/ Start Acres Impacted Crop/Orchard State MP Construction Operation Christmas Greenbrier, 150.4183.6 0.0319.5 0.007.50 TreesOrganic WVMonroe, WV Organic Monroe, WV 185.7 4.08 1.61 Organic Monroe, WV 193.6193.9 6.28057 2.790.38 Christmas Trees Montgomery, VA 220.8 0.16 0.11 Organic Monroe, WV 194.0 1.66 0.77 Organic Franklin, VA 273.1276.0 5.02 1.66

Source: USDA AMS Organic Farm Points, Monroe County Organic District, Landrun Parcels

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-8 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Recreational and Special Interest Areas within 0.25 Mile of the Mountain Valley Pipeline Route

Distance; Direction Crossing Construction Operatio Crossing MP County State Name of Area Ownership Existing Land Use from Pipeline Length (feet) (acres) n (acres) Method 67.166.8-66.9 Braxton WV Weston and Gauley Federal Forest Crossed 125 NA NA Bore Bridge Turnpike (COE) 68.87 Braxton WV Burnsville Lake WMA a/ State Forest; Open Crossed100 feet; NA176.4 0.00.45 0.00.21 NAOpen- (WVDNR) West cut 81.6 Braxton WV Elk River WMA State Forest; Open 1,5581,243 feet; NA 0.0 0.0 NA (WVDNR) West 104.5.17 Webster WV Big Ditch WMA State Forest; Open; 2,016676.4 feet; NA 0.0 0.0 NA (WVDNR) Agriculture; Water Southeast 156 Greenbrier WV Meadow River WMA State Forest 5,100 feet; East NA 0.0 0.0 NA (WVDNR) 160154.2-154.6 SummersFayet WV National Coal Heritage Private Mixed Crossed 2,62566,000 238.032.1 79.710.9 Open-cut 157.2-174.2 te Area 90,411 318.9 109.2 Summers 196.35.3 Monroe WV Jefferson National Federal Forest Crossed 488522 1.40.7 0.30.6 Open-cut 1965.4, Giles VA Forest (FS) 7,9589,295 26.728.4 10.713.8 Open-cut 197.8 218.67.2, Montgomery VA 9,655486 27.726.8 11.110.9 Open-cut 219.0220.7 195.4196.3 Giles VA Appalachian National Federal Forest Crossed 600 NA NA Bore Scenic Trail (FS) 196.8 Giles VA Peters Mountain Federal Forest; Open 74 135 feet; East NA 0.0 0.0 NA Wilderness (FS) 204.3- Giles VA New River Conservancy NGO Forest; Agriculture Crossed 2,148 6.5 2.5 Open-cut 204.603.4 Easement (Sizemore (NRC) Property) 209.9 Giles VA GIL-VOF-2250 State Agriculture; Open; 2,172 feet; NA 0.0 0.0 NA (VOF) b/ Forest Northeast 211.7209.3- Giles VA Newport Recreation County Residential; 178 feet; NA713 0.03.5 0.00.8 NAOpen- 209.4 Center (Giles) Commercial NortheastCrossed cut 218.49.8-220.7 Montgomery VA Brush Mountain Federal Forest Crossed 5,2804,919 15.213.8 6.15.6 Open-cut Inventoried Roadless (FS) Area 218.620 Montgomery VA Brush Mountain Federal Forest; Open 900 1,035 feet; NA 0.0 0.0 NA Wilderness (FS) East 219.420.7,228.3 Montgomery VA Catawba Valley Special State Agricultural; Forest Crossed 38,01640,245 135.37.1 47.65.9 Open-cut Project Area (VOF)

1 of 2 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-8 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Recreational and Special Interest Areas within 0.25 Mile of the Mountain Valley Pipeline Route

Distance; Direction Crossing Construction Operatio Crossing MP County State Name of Area Ownership Existing Land Use from Pipeline Length (feet) (acres) n (acres) Method 222.7 Montgomery VA MON-VOF-844 State Forest; Agriculture 2,032 feet; North NA 0.0 0.0 NA (VOF) 223 Montgomery VA MON-VOF-3333 State Forest; Agriculture Crossed 1,913 5.6 2.2 NA (VOF) 223.4 Montgomery VA Mill Creek Springs State Forest; Agriculture Crossed 414 1.3 0.6 Open-cut Natural Area Preserve (VDCR) 228.3 Montgomery VA MON-VOF-2606 State Forest; Open 2,152 feet; North NA 0.0 0.0 NA (VOF) 234.22.6 Montgomery VA MON-VOF-1871 State Forest; Agriculture Crossed 316314 4.40.9 2.50.4 Bore (VOF) 237.39.3 Roanoke VA MON-VOF-2564 State Forest; Open 1,4311,042 feet; NA 0.0 0.0 NA South 237.69.6,241 Roanoke VA TNC Easement NGO Forest; Open Crossed 7,025 23.91.8 8.1 Open-cut (TNC) 241.739.6 Roanoke VA ROA-VOF-2931 State Forest; Open Space; 865 feet; East NA 0.0 0.0 NA (VOF) Agriculture 241.2243.2 Roanoke VA BRLC Easement NGO Forest; Open Space 415 feet; East NA 0.0 0.0 NA (BRLC)

246.1,246.5244 Roanoke VA Blue Ridge Parkway Federal Forest; Open Space; Crossed 2,641276 8.65 3.33.1 Bore Franklin (NPS) Agriculture 382 222.9259.7 MontgomeryFr VAVA VA Outdoors State Forest; Open Space; 117 feet; NANA 0.00.0 0.00.0 NANA anklin Foundation (VOF)State AgricultureForest; South2,366 feet; EasementFRN-VOF- (VOF) Open Space; Southwest 2766 Agriculture 271.8 Franklin VA FRN-VOF-1549 State Forest; Agriculture 1,600 feet; NA 0.0 0.0 NA (VOF) Northeast a/ WMA = Wildlife Management Area b/ VOF = Virginia Outdoors Foundation

2 of 2 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-9 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Mountain Valley Project Facilities located within the National Coal Heritage Area Construction Pipeline length in Facility MPs Footprint (acres) NCHA (miles) 153.9154.2 – Fayette County, West Virginia 154.3154.6 0.480.50 Pipeline Right of Way 7.42.40 ATWSLaydown Yard 0.470.01 Access Roads 2.11 Stallworth CS 20.6829.89 156.8157.2 – Summers County, West Virginia 173.4174.2 16.6617.12 Pipeline Right of Way 245.45251.83 ATWS 72.150.08 Access Roads 43.7844.44 Cathodic Protection 0.62 Total 391.95379.27 17.1462

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-10 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Key Observation Points Along the Route of the Mountain Valley Pipeline and Assessments of Visual Impacts Key Observation Points Applicant’s Impact County/State MP Distance Selected by Applicant Assessments

Highway 20 Harrison, WV 15.34 Crosses Low-Moderate – traffic at speed

Ten Mile Creek Road Harrison, WV 18.78 Crosses Low-Moderate – traffic at speed

Fletchers Covered Bridge Harrison, WV 26.15.9 2.12 miles None – pipeline not visible

North Bend River Trail Harrison, WV 25.86.0 Crosses High

Smoke Camp WMA DoddridgeLewis, WV 39.73 0.6 mile None – view screened

Staunton-Parkersburg Turnpike Lewis, WV 47.98.0 Crosses Moderate – traffic at speed

I-79 Lewis , WV 60.12 Crosses Moderate – traffic at speed

Stonewall Jackson Lake WMA Lewis, WV 64.56 2.21 miles None – pipeline not visible

Burnsville Lake WMA Braxton, WV 68.68 Crosses None – view screened

Weston Gauley Bridge Turnpike Braxton, WV 72.566.9 Crosses High

Elk River WMA Webster, WV 81.6 0.23 mile None – view screened

Sutton Lake Webster, WV 84.1 1.10.1 miles None – view screened

Williams River State Backway Webster, WV 103.86 2.1 miles None – pipeline not visible

Big Ditch WMA Webster, WV 105.14.7 0.14 mile None – view screened

Cranberry WMA Nicholas, WV 109.86 1.9 miles None – pipeline not visible

Cranberry Tri-Rivers Rail Trail Nicholas, WV 117.26.9 <0.12.0 None – pipeline not visible miles

Summersville Lake Nicholas, WV 118.85 1.1 miles None – pipeline not visible

Coal Heritage and Midland Trail Greenbrier, WV 144.13.8 Crosses Moderate – traffic at speed

Meadow River WMA Greenbrier, WV 156.60 1.0 mile None – view screened

I-64 Greenbrier, WV 156.80 Crosses High

Bethlehem Farm Summers, WV 168.73 0.5 mile None – view screened

Greenbrier River Summers, WV 1710.4 Crosses High

Farm Heritage Road Monroe, WV 1821.8 Crosses High

Mountain’s Shadow Trail Monroe, WV 191.34.2 Crosses High

Sugar Camp Farm Trailhead Monroe, WV 194.91 1.08 miles None – pipeline not visible

Peters Mountain Wilderness Monroe, WV 196.55.3 75 feet0.4 None mile

Appalachian National Scenic Trail Monroe, WV 1965.3 Crosses None – the ANST crossing would be bored and views screened by a buffer of vegetation

Whitt Riverbend Park Giles, VA 2010.2 2.01.9 miles None – pipeline not visible

1 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-10 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Key Observation Points Along the Route of the Mountain Valley Pipeline and Assessments of Visual Impacts Key Observation Points Applicant’s Impact County/State MP Distance Selected by Applicant Assessments Big Stony Creek Road Giles, VA 201.80.9 Crosses<0. Moderate – traffic at speed 1 mile

Little Stoney Creek Giles, VA 2043.3 Crosses Moderate – adjacent to existing powerline

Cascade Falls Trailhead Giles, VA 204.90 1.0 mile None – pipeline not visible

Cascade Falls Giles, VA 206.35.2 2.46 miles None – pipeline not visible

Mountain Lake Park and Resort Giles, VA 208.57.4 2.34 miles None – pipeline not visible

Pig Hole Cave Giles, VA 209.18.3 0.42 mile Low – adjacent to existing powerline

Smokehole Cave and GIL-VOF- Giles, VA 211.209.9 0.54 mile None – pipeline not visible 2250 Open Space

Greater Newport Rural Historic Giles, VA 2110.82 Crosses0.6 Moderate – adjacent to existing District mile powerline

Sinking Creek and Link Farm Giles, VA 212.30.6 Adjacent Moderate – adjacent to existing Covered Bridge and 0.4 mile powerline

Newport Community Center and Giles, VA 213.40.9 180 feet and None – view screened Recreation Center 0.5 mile

Blue Grass Trail Giles, VA 213.62.1 Crosses0.6 Moderate – traffic at speed mile

Clover Hollow State Natural Area CraigGiles, VA 216.45.1 1.92.8 miles None – pipeline not visible Preserve

Brush Mountain Wilderness Montgomery, VA 218.6225. 0.254.8 Low- view screened 4 miles

Shenandoah Bike Trail and Park Montgomery, VA 221.74 3.22.4 miles None – pipeline not visible

Easy Wind Stables Montgomery, VA 224.63.0 Crosses1.0 Low- adjacent to existing mile powerline-

MON-VOF-333 Open Space Montgomery, VA 224.63.0 Crosses1.0 None – no public access mile

Mill Creek Springs Natural Area Montgomery, VA 224.53.2 Crosses0.3 Moderate - adjacent to existing Preserve mile powerline and no public access

Catawba Road Montgomery, VA 227.05.1 Crosses0.3 Moderate – adjacent to existing mile powerline

I-81 Montgomery, VA 234.32.7 Crosses Moderate – traffic at speed

Roanoke River Montgomery, VA 235.63.8 Crosses High

Camp Roanoke Roanoke, VA 2386.2 1.4 miles None – pipeline not visible

Poor Mountain Natural Area Roanoke, VA 24038.6 3.42.6 miles None – pipeline not visible Preserve

Bottom Creek Gorge MontgomeryRoanok 245.63.5 2.12 miles None – pipeline not visible e, VA

2 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-10 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Key Observation Points Along the Route of the Mountain Valley Pipeline and Assessments of Visual Impacts Key Observation Points Applicant’s Impact County/State MP Distance Selected by Applicant Assessments Blue Ridge Parkway Roanoke and 246.54.0 Crosses Moderate – bore under road in Franklin, VA area of pasture

Ferrum Mountain Road RoanokeFranklin, VA 246.64.5 0.2 miles None – pipeline not visible

Poor Mountain Overlook along FranklinRoanoke, VA 247.15.0 01.5 miles Low – view screened Blue Ridge Parkway

Slings Gap Overlook along Blue FranklinRoanoke, VA 249.45.8 2.46 miles None – pipeline not visible Ridge Parkway

Cahas Overlook along Blue Ridge Franklin, VA 248.36.2 2.14.7 miles Low – pipeline not visible Parkway

Cahas Mountain Franklin, VA 253.10.6 1.35 miles Low – view screened

GrassyGreen Hill State Natural Franklin, VA 261.4264. 1.5 miles None – pipeline not visible Area Preserve 0

Highway 220 Franklin, VA 2642.9 Crosses Moderate – traffic at speed

Blackwater River Franklin, VA 265.066.9 Crosses High

Pigg River Pittsylvania, VA 289.25.3 Crosses High

3 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-11 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Scenic Integrity Objectives Along the Route of the Mountain Valley Pipeline Within the Jefferson National Forest Approx. Forest Plan Inventoried Current SIO Rx 5C SIO a/, Location MPsMP MP End Rx a/ Scenic Class b/ b/ Start 196.2195.3 196.5 4.A 1 High Not Applicable -195.5 Peters Mountain 196.5195.5 197.8 8.A.1 2 Moderate Moderate – 196.9 218.5217.2 218.8 6.C 3 Moderate Low – 217.5 218.8217.5 218.9 8.A.1 3 Low Low – 217.6 Sinking Creek 218.9217.6 219.1 8.A.1 5 Low Moderate Mountain – 217.8 219.1217.8 219.4 8.A.1 2 Moderate Moderate – 218.0 219.2218.4 219.2 4J6.C 2 High Moderate – 218.55 218.55 – 8A1 2 Moderate Moderate 218.6 219.8218.6 220.5 4J 2 High Moderate – 218.8 Brush Mountain 218.8 – Moderate Low 219.2220.5 220.8 4J 53 219.2 – Moderate Low 219.5 4J 3 a/ Rx = Management Prescription b/ SIO = Scenery Integrity Objective

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.8.1-12 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Land Requirements for the Mountain Valley Project in the Jefferson National Forest Land Required for Construction Land Required for Facility (acres) Operation (acres) Pipeline a/ 52.247.9 20.520.6 Additional Temporary Workspace (ATWS) 1.0 0.0 Access Roads 27.632.7 17.320.7 Totals 80.981.6 37.841.3 a/ Acreage based on 125-foot-wide construction right-of-way and 50-foot-wide permanent right-of-way. Does not account for reduced workspace in sensitive areas.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.8.2-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Residences within 10 feet of Mountain Valley Project Construction Work Areas Distance From Edge of Building Type MP Workspace (feet) Residential Construction Plan ID House 0.0 0.0 (Purchased) House 0.0 0.0 (Purchased) House 0.8 10.0 (Purchased) House 1.3 1.0 RSS-H600-105 (ROW acquired) ShedCabin 20.7 0.0 RSS-H600-107 (not a residence) Mobile Home 26.0 0.0 RSS-H600-004, (Landowner Compensated) Mobile Home 26.0 0.0 RSS-H600-004, (Landowner Compensated) Cabin 32.2 1.0 RSS-H600-005 (ROW acquired) Cabin 34.1 0.0 (Purchased) House 40.0 4.0 RSS-H600-110 (ROW acquired) House 44.6 6.0 RSS-H600-033 (ROW acquired) House 44.6 1.0 RSS-H600-034 (ROW acquired) House 83.7 6.0 RSS-H600-043 (ROW acquired) Cabin 84.0 2.0 RSS-H600-044 (ROW acquired) Cabin 87.4 0.0 RSS-H600-007, (Landowner compensatedPurchased) House 115.3 4.0 RSS-H600-048 BarnHouse 116.2 6.0 RSS-H600-052 (not a residence) Mobile Home 138.6 0.0 RSS-H600-009 (ROW acquired) Mobile Home 138.7 1.0 RSS-H600-010 (ROW acquired) HouseBarn 143.9 0.0 (Landowner compensatedIn negotiations) House 155.2 6.0 RSS-H600-065 House 156.1 6.0 RSS-H600-067 HouseChurch 156.1 7.013.0 RSS-H600-068 (not a residence HouseBarn 166.6 1.0 RSS-H600-127 (not a residence House 169.9 6.0 RSS-H600-070 House 169.9 1.2 RSS-H600-165 Hunting Cabin 196.9197.8 5.0 RSS-H600-015 (PLROW signed) HouseCabin 197.5198.4 10.0 RSS-H600-016 (PLROW signed) Cabin 198.6199.5 6.0 RSS-H600-017 (PLROW signed) House 233.6 1.0 RSS-H600-084 House 233.6 1.0 RSS-H600-140 Cabin 264.5 6.1 RSS-H600-154 House 264.7 1.0 RSS-H600-092 Mobile Home 266.6269.5 0.0 RSS-H600-155 not a residence HouseChurch 295.1298.1 9.7 RSS-H600-160 (PLROW signed) Note: Bolded text indicates landowner concurrence with site-specific residential construction plans needed

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.8.2-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Reallocation of Management Prescriptions (acres) a/ Reallocated to Cleared for Maintained in Existing Rx Revegetated Rx 5C Construction Grass/Forb Rx 4A 0 0 0 0 Rx 4J 5662 14 8 6 Rx 6C 1920 95 63 32 Rx 8A1 111112 2932 1817 1115 Total 186194 52 3229 2023 a/ Rx 11is embedded within the other Rxs

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.8.2-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Key Observation Points Along the Route of the Mountain Valley Pipeline in the Jefferson National Forest and Assessments of Visual Impacts Key Observation Impact Assessments based on County/State MP Distance Points Visual Simulations Peters Mountain Monroe, WV 195.3197.3 75 144 feet Low – pipeline right-of-way is only Wilderness slightly visible from the viewpoint in the simulation

Appalachian National Monroe, WV 195.3196.3 Crosses Low – the ANST crossing would be Scenic Trail bored and views screened by vegetation and topography because of the roughly 300 foot buffer between the trail and the bore pits

Craig Creek Road Montgomery, 218219.4.0 Crosses Low – the road crossing would be VA bored and views of the right-of-way through the forest would be screened by a vegetation buffer along the road

Brush Mountain Montgomery, 218.6220 0.250.2 Low- view screened by thick forest Wilderness VA mile between the proposed pipeline route and the Wilderness

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.9.1-5 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Major Tourist Attractions and Recreation Areas in the Vicinity of the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Approximate Distance Attraction County a/ from the Projects West Virginia Lantz Farm and Nature Preserve Wetzel County 5.0 miles Lewis Wetzel WMA Wetzel County 6.0 miles Hoyt Forest Wetzel County 5.0 miles North Bend Rail Trail Harrison County Crossed by the pipeline Smoke Camp WMA Lewis County 0.6 mile Stonewall Jackson Lake WMA Lewis County 2.1 miles Stonewall Resort (at Stonewall Jackson Lake Lewis County 4.3 miles State Park) Jackson’s Mill Lewis County 6.2 miles Staunton-Parkersburg Turnpike (Scenic Lewis County Crossed by the pipeline Byway) Burnsville Lake and Burnsville Lake WMA Braxton County 0.2 mileCrossed by the pipeline Weston Gauley Bridge Turnpike Braxton County Crossed by the pipeline Elk River WMA Braxton County 0.20.3 mile Bee Run Recreation Area Braxton County 10.7 miles Bulltown Recreation Area Braxton County 1.5 miles Big Ditch WMA Webster County 676 feet0.4 mile Bakers Island Recreation Area Webster County 7.6 miles Salt Sulphur Well and Veterans Memorial Webster County 7.3 miles Holly River State Park Webster County 5.0 miles Cranberry WMA Webster, Nicholas, and Greenbrier 1.9 miles Counties Summersville Lake Nicholas County 1.1 miles Cranberry Tri-Rivers Rail-Trail Nicholas County 2.0 miles Gauley River Nicholas County Crossed by the pipeline Gauley River National Recreation Area Nicholas County 16.0 miles Carbufax Ferry Battlefield State Park Nicholas County 12.0 miles Meadow River WMA Greenbrier County Adjacent to laydown yard0.9 mile Blue Bend Recreation Area Greenbrier County 25.4 miles Greenbrier River Trail Greenbrier County 24.6 miles Greenbrier State Forest Greenbrier County 21.0 miles Lewisburg and Ronceverte Trail Greenbrier County 15.5 miles Midland Trail - National Coal Heritage Trail Greenbrier County Crossed by the pipeline (Scenic Byway) Babcock State Park Fayette County 9.9 miles Hawks Nest State Park Fayette County 26.0 miles New River Gorge National River Summers County 5.3 miles Pipestem Resort State Park Summers County 14.0 miles Bluestone State Park Summers County 12.0 miles Bluestone National Scenic River Summers County 12.0 miles Bluestone WMA Summers County 4.7 miles

1 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.9.1-5 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Major Tourist Attractions and Recreation Areas in the Vicinity of the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Approximate Distance Attraction County a/ from the Projects National Coal Heritage Area Fayette and Summers Counties Crossed by the pipeline George Washington National Forest Greenbrier County 21.0 miles Little Beaver State Park Raleigh County 18.1 miles Potts Valley Rail Trail Monroe County 13.3 miles Moncove Lake State Park Monroe County 18.6 miles Slaty Mountain Preserve Monroe County 23.2 miles Jefferson National Forest Monroe County Crossed by the pipeline Appalachian Trail Monroe County Crossed by the pipeline Virginia Niday Place State Forest Craig County 4.1 miles Appalachian Trail Giles County Crossed by the pipeline Jefferson National Forest Giles County Crossed by the pipeline Peters Mountain Wilderness Giles County 75 135 feet Cascade Falls and Recreation Area Giles County 2.6 miles Cascades National Recreation Trail Giles County 1.1 miles Mountain Lake Park and Resort Giles County 2.4 miles Whitt-Riverbend Park Giles County 1.9 miles Greater Newport Rural Historic District Giles County Crossed by the pipeline Dismal Falls Giles County 18.5 miles Claytor Lake State Park Pulaski County 20.0 miles New River Gorge National Recreation Trail Fayette and Summers Counties 15.0 miles Roanoke River Montgomery County Crossed by the pipeline Elliston Park Montgomery County 0.6 mile Shenandoah Bike Trail and Park Montgomery County 2.4 miles Bottom Creek Gorge Montgomery County 2.2 miles North Fork Valley Rural Historic District Montgomery County Crossed by the pipeline Brush Mountain Wilderness Montgomery County 1,035 feet Cahas Mountain Roanoke County 1.5 miles Cahas Overlook Roanoke County 4.7 miles Camp Roanoke Roanoke County 1.4 miles Poor Mountain Overlook Roanoke County 1.50.5 miles Blue Ridge Parkway Roanoke and Franklin Counties Crossed by the pipeline Slings Gap Overlook Franklin County 2.6 miles Pigg River (State Scenic River) Franklin County Crossed by the pipeline Smith Mountain Lake Franklin County 1.9 miles Philpot Lake Franklin County 23.6 miles Waid Recreation Area Franklin County 5.7 miles White Oak Mountain WMA Pittsylvania County 1.7 miles Pennsylvania Beachwood Farms Nature Preserve Allegheny County 20.0 miles Riverview Golf Course Allegheny County 0.25 mile Monongahela River Allegheny and Washington Counties Crossed by H-318

2 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.9.1-5 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Major Tourist Attractions and Recreation Areas in the Vicinity of the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project Approximate Distance Attraction County a/ from the Projects Mountour Trail Washington County 6.1 miles Panhandle Trail Washington County 13.5 miles Canonburg Lake Washington County 9.0 miles a/ Several attractions are located in multiple counties and/or states. Only the counties within the project area are listed on this table.

3 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.10.1-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Identified by the Public in the Vicinity of the Mountain Valley Project and the FERC Staff’s Evaluation of Potential Project Effects Distance to Pipeline Potential Project Site/Name/Number County/State NRHP Evaluation (miles) Effects (reason) Josiah Whitney Webster, WV Unknown Unknown Unknown Cemetery a/ McElwain Cemeteries Webster, WV Unknown 0.7 mile 0.6 No effect (outside direct mile APE) 0.2 mile 1852 Beaver Gist Mill Nicholas, WV NRHP-listed 0.2 mile 0.3 No effect (outside (NR#01000776) mile indirect APE)Within indirect APE Civil War camp at Ford Greenbrier, WV Not evaluated 1.4 2 miles No effect (outside Hollow indirect APE) Bartholomew Summers, WV Unknown Unknown Unknown Cemetery a/ Colonel Gwin Summers, WV NRHP-listed 1.2 miles No effect (outside Plantation indirect APE) Colonel James Graham Summers, WV NRHP-listed 1 mile No effect (outside Home indirect APE) Hungards Creek Summers, WV Not yet evaluated Crosses Unknown (sites not yet archaeological sites tested) (46SU239 & 46SU719) 46SU239 Summers, WV Not evaluated 0.1 mile Within indirect APE 46SU719 Summers, WV Not evaluated 0.25 mile Within indirect APE Greenbrier River at Summers, WV Not yet evaluated Crosses Unknown (sites not yet Pence Springs tested) archaeological sites (46SU147, 46SU722, & 46SU725) Pence Springs Hotel Summers, WV NRHP-listed 0.34 mile No effect (outside Historic District indirect APE) 46SU147 Summers, WV Not evaluated 0.008 mile Within direct APE 46SU722 Summers, WV Not evaluated 0.02 mile Within direct APE 46SU725 Summers, WV Not evaluated 0.07 mile Within direct APE Alderson Historic Monroe and NRHP-listed 4.8 miles Outside Indirect APE District Greenbrier, WV Johnson Crossroads Monroe, WV Unknown 3.1 miles No effect (outside Cemetery indirect APE) Cook’s Old Mill Monroe, WV NRHP-listed 0.58 mile No effect (outside indirect APE) Cook’s Fort Monroe, WV Not evaluated 1.34.8 miles No effect (outside indirect APE) Wood’s Fort Monroe, WV Not evaluated 2.0 5 miles No effect (outside indirect APE) Red Sulfur Springs Monroe, WV Not evaluated 2.53 miles No effect (outside Resort indirect APE)

1 of 4 DEIS TABLE 4.10.1-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Identified by the Public in the Vicinity of the Mountain Valley Project and the FERC Staff’s Evaluation of Potential Project Effects Distance to Pipeline Potential Project Site/Name/Number County/State NRHP Evaluation (miles) Effects (reason) McClung’s Mill Monroe, WV Not evaluated 3.98.2 miles No effect (outside indirect APE)

DEIS TABLE 4.10.1-2 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Identified by the Public in the Vicinity of the Mountain Valley Project and the FERC Staff’s Evaluation of Potential Project Effects Distance to Pipeline Potential Project Site/Name/Number County/State NRHP Evaluation (miles) Effects (reason) Reed’s Grist Mill Monroe, WV NRHP-listed 9.312.8 miles No effect (outside indirect APE) Hanging Rock Monroe, WV Not evaluated 11.212 miles No effect (outside Observatory on Peters indirect APE) Mountain Elmwood Monroe, WV NRHP-listed 8.4 miles No effect (outside indirect APE) Old Sweet Springs Monroe, WV NRHP-listed 20.522.8 miles No effect (outside Resort indirect APE) Sinks Grove Monroe, WV Not evaluated 5.68.3 miles No effect (outside indirect APE) Old Rehoboth Church Monroe, WV Not evaluated 6.210.3 miles No effect (outside indirect APE) New Zion Church Monroe, WV Not evaluated 9.410 miles No effect (outside indirect APE) Waiteville Christian Monroe, WV Not evaluated 9.410 miles No effect (outside Church indirect APE) Potts Valley Railroad Monroe, WV Not evaluated 8.7 miles No effect (outside indirect APE) Indian Creek Bridge Monroe, WV NRHP-listed 7 miles No effect (outside indirect APE) Laurel Creek Bridge Monroe, WV NRHP-listed 4.40 miles No effect (outside indirect APE) Pickaway Rural Monroe, WV NRHP-listed 9.6 miles No effect (outside Historic Historic indirect APE) District (Center Point) Salt Sulphur Springs Monroe, WV NRHP-listed 7 miles No effect (outside Historic District indirect APE) Union Historic District Monroe, WV NRHP-listed 8 miles No effect (outside indirect APE)

2 of 4 Cumberland Gap Trail Craig, VA Unknown 0.56 mile No effect (outside indirect APE)Within indirect APE Audie Murphy Montgomery, VA Unknown 7.2 5 miles No effect (outside Memorial indirect APE) Griffith John Cabin a/ Montgomery, VA Unknown Unknown Unknown Wilderness Road Montgomery, VA Unknown Crosses No adverse effect (now modern I-81) Civil War Cemetery a/ Montgomery, VA Unknown Unknown Unknown Johnsville Old German Montgomery, VA UnknownNRHP- 4.1 2 miles No effect (outside Baptist Meetinghouse listed indirect APE) Appalachian National Giles, Virginia & NRHP-listed Crosses Within direct APE Scenic Trail Historic Monroe, West District Virginia Kinzie houses Giles, VA Unknown 0.5 mile No effect (outside direct 0.2 mile APE) Kinzie land Giles, VA Non-contributing 0.39 mile Within indirect APE Kinzie/Talbot Giles, VA Non-contributing 0.1 mile Within indirect APE Archaeological sites Giles, VA Unknown Unknown Unknown on Kinzie farm a/ 1912 Red Covered Giles, VA Contributing 0.06 mile No adverse effects Bridge element to NRHP- (special construction listed Greater techniques to be used to Newport Rural avoid impacts) Historic District Big Stony Creek Giles, VA NRHP-listed Crosses Within direct APE Historic District C.A. Hardwick House Giles, VA Unknown 0.07 mile Within indirect APE Chestnut Grove Giles, VA Contributing 0.2 mile Within indirect APE School Echols Residence Giles, VA Non-contributing 0.04 mile Within direct APE Fidel Smith Store Giles, VA Contributing 0.03 mile Within indirect APE Harvey Residence Giles, VA Contributing 0.23 mile Within indirect APE Higgenbotham House Giles, VA Contributing 0.37 mile Within indirect APE Huffman House Giles, VA Non-contributing 0.26 mile Within indirect APE Iron Ore Smelting Giles, VA Contributing 0.26 mile No effect (outside Furnace (Bud indirect APE) Reynolds Farm) Leffel Mansion (Leffel Giles, VA Contributing 0.38 mile Within indirect APE Farm) Low Water Bridge (Old Giles, VA Contributing 0.08 mile Within indirect APE Furnace Road Low Water Bridge) Lucas Residence Giles, VA Non-contributing 0.18 mile Within indirect APE Martin Property Giles, VA Unevaluated 0.11 mile Within indirect APE Sidewalk and Community Springbox Newport High Giles, VA Contributing 0.23 mile Within indirect APE School/Fair Grounds Newport High Giles, VA Contributing 0.19 mile Within indirect APE School/Sidewalk

3 of 4 Newport High Giles, VA Contributing 0.16 mile Within indirect APE School/Springbox Newport United Giles, VA Contributing 0.08 mile Within indirect APE Methodist Church, Newport – Mt. Olivet United Methodist Church Newsome Barn Giles, VA Contributing 0.24 mile Within indirect APE Plunkett Farm Giles, VA Contributing 0.17 mile Wtihin direct APE Ward and Alice Giles, VA Non-contributing 0.39 mile Within indirect APE Williams House Newport Historic Giles, VA NRHP-listed 0.03 mile Within indirect APE District Greater Newport Rural Giles, VA NRHP-listed Crosses Within direct APE Historic District Wilford Dowdy House Giles, VA Contributing 0.03 mile Within direct APE (Welford Dowdy House) Winding Brook Giles, VA Contributing 0.37 mile Within indirect APE Farm/Sheldon Dowdy Residence (Dowdy- Reynolds Farm) Historic Ross Craig, VA Unknown 7.5 miles No effect (outside Cemetery indirect APE) North Fork Valley Montgomery, VA NRHP-listed Crosses Wtihin direct APE Rural Historic District (Luster’s Gate/Roanoke Valley) Wilderness Road Montgomery, VA Unknown Crosses Wtihin direct APE (modern I-81) Archaeological sites Roanoke, VA Unknown Unknown Unknown along Teels Creek a/ Bent Mountain Historic Roanoke, VA NRHP-listed Crosses Within direct APE District Coles-Terry Rural Roanoke, VA NRHP-listed Crosses Within direct APE Historic District Blue Ridge Parkway Roanoke, VA NRHP-listed Crosses Within direct APE Historic District Bowman Farm Franklin, VA UnknownEligible 0.68 mile No effect (outside direct APE) Cahas Mountain Rural Franklin, VA NRHP-listed 1.5 miles No effect (outside Historic District indirect APE) Slave Cemetery a/ Pittsylvania, VA Unknown Unknown Unknown a/ At this time we have insufficient data to locate the site in relation to the MVP.

4 of 4 DEIS TABLE 4.10.2-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Consulting Party Requests and Data Conveyance Date Mountain FERC Response Valley Conveyed Entity/Individuals Request Date Date Reports a/ Greater Newport Rural Historic District November 15, 2014 February 18, 2016 May 25 and July 22, Committee 2016 Barbara Rasmussen May 23, 2016 February 18, 2016 N/A Preservation Virginia June 10, 2015 February 18, 2016 May 25 and July 22,, 2016 Summers County Historic Landmark June 11, 2015 February 18, 2016 March 8 & April 12, Committee 2016 Preserve Montgomery County June 15, 2015 February 18, 2016 May 25 and July 22, 2016 Roanoke Valley Preservation June 16, 2015 February 18, 2016 TBD Foundation Committee for Appalachian and June 16, 2015 February 18, 2016 May 25, and July22, Piedmont Preservation 2016 Roanoke County Board of Supervisors June 30, 2015 February 18, 2016 TBD Pittsylvania County Historical Society August 27, 2015 February 10, 2016 TBDJuly 22, 2016 The Association for the Study of August 27, 2015 February 18, 2016 TBDJuly 22, 2016 Archaeological Properties Giles County Board of Supervisors February 18, 2016 March 2, 2016 May 25, 2016 July 2, 2016 Michael Williams, Miller Williams, March 10, 2016 April 8, 2016 N/A Frances Williams Collins and Tony Williams Jerry and Jerolyn Deplazes March 10, 2016 April 8, 2016 N/A Joel and Ann Rader March 23, 2016 April 8, 2016 N/A Clarence and Karolyn Givens March 23, 2016 April 8, 2016 N/A Newport-Mt. Olivet United Methodist March 23, 2016 April 8, 2016 N/A Church Nathan Deplazes and Shannon Lucas March 23, 2016 April 8, 2016 N/A Montgomery County Board of March 30, 2016 April 14, 2016 May 4, 2016 Supervisors Newport Community Action April 18, 2016 May 19, 2016 N/A Committee N/A = Not Applicable (because either reports were not specifically requested or confidentiality agreements not signed) TBD = To Be Determined later in the proceeding a/ See filing by Mountain Valley on July 18, 2016, in response to our June 28, 2016 EIR#3 Cultural Resources Question 11, Attachment DR-3.

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.10.6-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Previously Recorded Historic Districts in the Vicinity of the Mountain Valley Project Name of the District County/State Distance From Pipeline

Pence Spring Hotel Historic District Summers, WV 0.47 25 mile from MP 171.0 Alderson Historic District Monroe, WV 5.5 miles from MP 166.4 Salt Sulphur Spring Historic District Monroe, WV 6.5 miles from MP 181.9 Union Historic District Monroe, WV 8.0 miles from MP 178.8 Appalachian National Scenic Trail Historic Monroe, WV Crossed at MP 196.3 District Giles, VA Newport Historic District Giles, VA 0.003 mile from MP 212.911.6 Greater Newport Rural Historic District Giles, VA Crossed between MPs 210.8209.7- –216.95.7 North Fork Valley Rural Historic District Montgomery, VA Crossed between MPs 226.3-228at MP 224.1 Lafayette Historic District Montgomery, VA 0.524 mile from MP 234.883 Oak Hill Old German Baptist Brethren Montgomery, VA 0.961.0 mile from MP 267.365.7 Community Rural Historic District Coles-Terry Rural Historic District Roanoke, VA Crossed between MPs 240.32-–243 Bent Mountain Historic District Roanoke, VA Crossed between MPs 243-246 Blue Ridge Parkway Historic District Roanoke & Franklin, Crossed at MP 244.2246-246.50 VA Cahas Mountain Rural Historic District Franklin, VA 1.738 miles from MP 254.4 Boones Mill Historic District Franklin, VA Greater than 0.5 mile from1.42 mile from MP 258.77 Penhook Historic District Franklin, VA Greater than 0.5 mile from0.74 mile from MP 283.1 MP 272 Lynchburg & Danville Railroad Historic District Pittsylvania, VA Crossed at MP 298.45.5

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.10.6-2 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Historic Architectural Sites in the Greater Newport Rural Historic District Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project Site Site Name/ Type Distance (feet)/ Consultant SHPO Comments Number (Element) Recommendations 035-0412- Plunkett Farm 131 (from access Contributing 8/4/16-agree Contributing 0052 road)24.7 (from access road temporary work space) 35-412-8 Gilbert House 91 (from access Non-contributing Not yet filed road) 35-412-9 Adie Jones Land 160 (from access Non-contributing Not yet filed road) 35-412-10 Pole Barn on Adie 86 (from ATWS) Contributing 5/25/16 – agree Contributing Jones Farm 35-412-34 Low Water Bridge 87 (from ATWS) Contributing Not yet filed 35-412-35 Wilford Dowdy 100 (from access Contributing Not yet filed House road) 35-412-66 High School 143 (from ATWS) Contributing Not yet filed Agriculture Building 35-412-67 Sutphin House 125 (from ATWS) Non-contributing Not yet filed 035-0412- Echols Residence 25.5 (from Non-contributing 8/4/16-agree non- 0068 access road Contributing temporary work space) 035-0412- Ackerman House 63.9 (from Non-contributing 8/4/16-agree non- 0069 access road Contributing temporary work space) 35-412-237 Fidel Smith Store 86 (from ATWS) Contributing Not yet filed 35-412-244 Link Farm 207 (from ATWS) Contributing 5/25/16 – agree Contributing 035-0412- Red 1912 Sinking 39 (from access Contributing 5/25/16 – 8/4/16-agree 0245; 035- Creek Covered road temporary Contributing and individually 0005 Bridge work space) Eligible 35-412-278 Chestnut Grove 90 (from access Contributing Not yet filed School road) 035-0412- Cemetery 97.2 (from Contributing 5/25/16 – agree Contributing 0465 pipeline workspace limits) 035-0412- Road Trace on 36.6 (pipeline Contributing 5/25/16 – agree Contributing 0466 Adie Jones Farm workspace limits) 35-5001 Sinking Creek 67.3 (from Non-contributing 8/4/16-agree Contributing Bridge #6052 access road temporary work space) Source: Table 1 Turco, June 2016

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) WEST VIRGINIA 46HS99 Historic Harrison, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH AvoidNone industrial site (7/2015) Unevaluated (10/6/15) related to oil Unevaluated and gas well No Effect drilling (ca. Avoided 1950s) (8/22/2016) 46HS101 Multi- Harrison, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH MitigateNone component (7/2015) Eligible (10/6/15)7/14 6/2016 /2016) Unevaluated No Adverse Effect. 46HS111 Multi- Harrison, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH Testing component (7/2015) Unevaluated (10/6/15)) Pending No Access Unevaluated Access 46LE77 Native Lewis, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH MitigateNone American (7/2015) Eligible (10/6/15)7/14 rock shelter 6/2016 /2016 Unevaluated No Adverse Effect 46LE42/80 Historic Lewis, WV Tetra Tech Listed WVDCH AvoidNone St. Bernard’s church and (7/2015) NR (10/6/15) Church and cemetery #85001583 NRHP listed Cemetery (ca. 1909) No Effect Avoided 8/22/15 46LE81 Native Lewis, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH AvoidNone American (7/2015) Unevaluated (10/6/15)Une lithic scatter 6/2016 valuatedNo Effect Avoided (8/22/2016) 46LE82 Historic Lewis, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH AvoidNone archaeologic (7/2015) Unevaluated (10/6/15)No al site 6/2016 Effect AvoidedUnev aluated 8/22/2016 46BX114 Native Braxton, WV Tetra Tech SEARCH WVDCH TestAvoided American (10/2015) Eligible (11/16/15)Un lithic scatter Report evaluated Submittal Pending PendingUnev aluated

1 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) Weston and Historic road Braxton, WV Tetra Tech Listed WVDCH Bore under Gauley (ca. 1849) (10/2015) NR# (11/16/15) roadt to avoid Bridge 98001430 NRHP Listed Turnpike - provide (Field #57) additional data WVDCH (4/7/16) No adverse effects Avoided if bored 46NI808 Historic Nicholas, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH Additional farmstead (12/2015) Unevaluated (1/27/16) Phase I No Access Unevaluated survey when accessible 46NI811 Native Nicholas, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH AvoidNone American (12/2015) Unevaluated (1/27/16)Une mound valuated No Effect Avided 8/22/2016 46NI817 Multi- Nicholas, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH TestNone component (12/2015) Unevaluated No Effect Avoided(1/27/ 16) (8/22/2016)U nevaluated 46NI821 Native Nicholas, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH AvoidNone American (12/2015) Unevaluated (1/27/16) lithic scatter Unevaluated No Effect Avoided (8/22/2016) 46NI822 Native Nicholas, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH Avoid American (12/2015)0 Unevaluated (1/27/16) lithic scatter No Effect Avoided Unevaluated8 /22/2016 46NI824 Multi- Nicholas, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH AvoidNone component (12/2015) Unevaluated No Effect Avoided (1/27/16)Une valuated(8(82 2/2016)

2 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 46NI827 Multi- Nicholas, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH TestNone component (12/2015) Will (1/27/16) Pending Recommend Unevaluated WDCH Not Eligible Review Concurrence Unevaluated Pending 46GB492 Native Greenbrier, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH TestNone American WV (12/2015) Unevaluated No Effect lithic scatter Avoided (8(822/2016)( 1/27/16) Unevaluated 46GB493 Native Greenbrier, Tetra Tech Unevaluated WVDCH Test American WV (12/2015) (1/27/16) lithic scatter Unevaluated 46GB498 Native Greenbrier, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH TestNone American WV (12/2015) Unevaluated (1/27/16) Pending lithic scatter Will Unevaluated WDCH Recommend Review Concurrence Eligible Pending Avoided by Boring 46GB499 Multi- Greenbrier, Tetra Tech Unevaluated WVDCH None component WV (12/2015) Tetra Tech (1/27/16) Pending Will Unevaluated WDCH Recommend Review Concurrence Not Eligible Pending Test 46GB500 Native Greenbrier, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None American WV (12/2015) Will Review Pending lithic scatter Recommend Pending(1/27 WDCH Not /16) Concurrence EligibleUneva Unevaluated Test luated 46GB503 Multi- Greenbrier, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None component WV (12/2015) Will Review Pending Recommend Pending(1/27 WDCH Not /16) Concurrence EligibleUneva Unevaluated Test luated 46GB505 Native Greenbrier, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None American WV (12/2015) Will Review Pending lithic scatter Recommend Pending(1/27 WDCH EligibleUneva /16) Concurrence luated Unevaluated Test

3 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 46SU78 Native Summers, SearchSEAR SEARCH WVDCH TestNone American WV CH (2/2016) Will Review Pending lithic scatter Recommend Pending(4/4/ WDCH Not Eligible 16) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Phase II Report SubmittalUne valuated 46SU147 Native Summers, SearchSEAR SEARCH WVDCH None American WV CH (2/2016) Recommend Review Pending lithic scatter Lower Pending WDCH Terrace Not Concurrence Eligible Test Pending Phase II and Geomorph Report Submittal Avoidance High Terrace Unevaluated 46SU181 Native Summers, SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH Avoid None American WV (2/2016) Unevaluated (4/4/16) lithic scatter Avoided No Effect Avoided 8/22/2016Un evaluated 46SU239 Multi- Summers, SearchSEAR Unevaluated WVDCH Test component WV CH (2/2016) (4/4/16) Unevaluated 46SU717 Native Summers, SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None American WV (2/2016) Will (4/4/16) Pending lithic scatter Recommend Unevaluated WDCH Not Eligible Review Concurrence Pending Pending Test Phase II Report Submittal

46SU722 Native Summers, Search SEARCH WVDCH None American WV SEARCH Unevaluated Review Pending lithic scatter (2/2016) Avoided Pending WDCH (4/4/16) Concurrence Unevaluated Test

4 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) Wiseman Historic Summers, SEARCH Eligible WVDCH Avoid the Residence house WV (2/2016) (4/4/16) framhoiuse (Field Site 4) (ca. 1910) Eligible Effects (4/4/16) Assessment Reporting 46ME280 Native Monroe, WV SearchSEAR SEARCH WVDCH None American CH (2/2016) Will Review Pending lithic scatter Recommend Pending WDCH Not Eligible (4/4/16) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Test Phase II Report Submittal Unevaluated 46ME281 Native Monroe, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None American (2/2016) Will Review Pending lithic scatter Recommend Pending WDCH Not Eligible (4/4/16) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Test Phase II Report Submittal Unevaluated 46ME282 Native Monroe, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH Avoid American (2/2016) Unevaluated (4/4/16) None lithic scatter Avoided Unevaluated No Effect Avoided (8/22/2016) 46ME283 Native Monroe, WV SearchSEAR SEARCH WVDCH None American CH (2/2016) Will (4/4/16) Pending lithic scatter Recommend Unevaluated WVDCH Not Eligible Review Concurrence Pending Pending Test Phase II Report Submittal Unevaluated

5 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 46ME284 Native Monroe, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None American (2/2016) Will Review Pending lithic scatter Recommend Pending WVDCH Not Eligible (4/4/16) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Test Phase II Report Submittal Unevaluated 46ME285 Historic Monroe, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None artifact (2/2016) Will Review Pending scatter Recommend Pending WVDCH Not Eligible (4/4/16) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Test Phase II Report Submittal Unevaluated Tilley Historic Monroe, WV SearchSEAR Eligible WVDCH Avoid Farmstead house CH (2/2016) (4/4/16) (Field Site (ca. 1900) Eligible 233) VIRGINIA 44GS226 Multi- Giles, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR Test component (11/2015) Unevaluated Review None Avoided Pending Pending (12/31/15) VDHR Potentially Concurrence Eligible 44GS227 Multi- Giles, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None component (11/2015) Will (12/31/15) Pending Recommend Potentially VDHR Not Eligible EligibleRevie Concurrence Pending w Pending Test Phase II report Submittal Unevaluated 44GS229 Native Giles, VA Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR None American (11/2015) Tetra Tech (12/31/15) Pending camp will Potentially VDHR recommend EligibleRevie Concurrence not eligible, w Pending Test Phase II report submittal pending

6 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 44GS230 Native Giles, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (11/2015) Recommend (12/31/15) Pending camp Eligible, Potentially VDHR Avoided Eligible Concurrence Phase II Review Test report Pending submittal pending Unevaluated 44GS231 Native Giles, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (11/2015) Unevaluated (12/31/15) Pending camp Will Potentially VDHR Recommend Eligible Concurrence Not Eligible Review Avoid Phase II Pending report submittal pending

44GS232 Native Giles, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (11/2015) Unevaluated (12/31/15) Pending camp Avoided Potentially VDHR EligibleNo Concurrence Effect Avoid Avoided 44GS234 Native Giles, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (11/2015) Recommend Review Pending Lithic Scatter Not Eligible Pending VDHR Concurrence 44GS235 Historic Giles, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None farmstead (11/2015) Unevaluated Review Pending Avoided Pending VDHR (12/31/15) Concurrence Potentially Avoid Eligible 44GS236 Historic Giles, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None farmstead (11/2015) Will Review Pending Recommend Pending VDHR Not Eligible Concurrence Pending Avoid Phase II Report SubmittalUne valuated

7 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 44GS237 Native Giles, VA Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR Test American (11/2015) (12/31/15) camp Potentially Eligible 44GS238 Native Giles, VA Tetra Tech SEARCH USFS Test American (5/2016) Unevaluated Review lithic scatter Pending 44GS0240 Native Giles, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (5/2016) Recommend Review Pending lithic scatter Not Eligible Pending VDHR Concurrence 44GS241 Multi- Giles, VA Tetra Tech SEARCH USFS None component (5/2016) Unevaluated Pending Pending Avoided USFS Concurrence Test 44GS242 Native Giles, VA Tetra Tech SEARCH USFS Test American (5/2016) Unevaluated Pending lithic scatter Greater Historic rural Giles, VA New South Listed VDHR Special Newport district Associates (5/25/16) construction Rural Historic (ca. 1745- (3/2016) Listed techniques District 1949) and (35-412) avoidance of resources in the district Effects Assessment Adie Jones Historic Giles, VA New South Contributing VDHR Avoid Farm pole farmstead Associates element to (5/25/16) Effects barn barn (3/2016) NRHP-listed Contributing Assessment (35-412-10) (ca. 1900) Greater Newport Rural Historic District Red Covered Historic Giles, VA New South Contributing VDHR Avoid Bridge bridge Associates element to (5/25/16) Effects (35-412-245), (ca. 1912) (3/2016) NRHP-listed Contributing Assessment Greater Newport Rural Historic District

8 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) Cemetery Historic Giles, VA New South Within VDHR Avoid (35-412-465) cemetery Associates boundaries of (5/25/16) Effects (ca. 1900) (3/2016) NRHP-listed Contributing Assessment Greater Newport Rural Historic District Fidel Smith Historic store Giles, VA Greater Contributing 8/04/2016 Avoid Store and Newport element to Pending Effects (35-412-237) apartment Rural Historic NRHP-listed Assessment (ca. 1936) District Greater Committee Newport Rural Historic District Appalachian Historic Giles, VA Unknown Eligible VDHR Bore under Trail hiking trail (5/25/16) trail to avoid (21-512) (ca. 1928) Eligible impacts Effects Assessment 35-5129 Structure and Giles, VA Structure and Cemetery Cemetery 35-5130 Barn Giles, VA 022-5040 Earthworks Craig, VA 44CG0253 Native Craig, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Will Review Pending Lithic Scatter Recommend Pending VDHR Not Eligible Concurrence Pending Phase II Report Submittal 44CG0254 Native Craig, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Will Review Pending Lithic Scatter Recommend Pending VDHR Not Eligible Concurrence Pending Phase II Report Submittal 44CG0255 Native Craig, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Will Review Pending Lithic Scatter Recommend Pending VDHR Not Eligible Concurrence Pending Phase II Report Submittal

9 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 44MY53 Native Montgomery, Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR Avoid American VA (3/2016) (4/21/16) camp Unevaluated Avoid 44MY216 Historic Montgomery, Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR Avoid cemetery VA (3/2016) (4/21/16) Unevaluated Avoid North Fork Historic rural Montgomery, New South Listed VDHR Special Valley Rural districtRural VA Associates(3/ (5/25/16) construction Historic Historic 2016) Listed techniques District District and (60-574) (ca. 1745- avoidance of 1940) resources in the district Effects assessment Cemetery Historic Montgomery, New South Eligible within VDHR Effects (60-574-126) cemetery VA Associates(3/ boundaries of (5/25/16) assessment 2016) the North Eligible Fork Valley Rural Historic District Barn Historic barn Montgomery, New South Eligible within VDHR Effects (60-574-125) (ca. 1910) VA Associates(3/ boundaries of (5/25/16) assessment 2016) the North Eligible Fork Valley Rural Historic District Blue Ridge Historic road Roanoke New South Listed VDHR Bore under Parkway (ca. 1935) and Franklin, Associates (5/25/16) road to avoid Historic VA (3/2016) Listed impacts District Effects (60-5161) Assessment HAER NC-42 Pending NPS Comments Cemetery Cemetery Montgomery, New South 060-5190 VA Associates Cemetery Cemetery Montgomery, New South 060-5194 VA Associates 44FR355 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR Avoid None American (9/2015) Unevaluated (12/30/15)No Pending camp Avoided Effect VDHR Avoided Concurrence Potentially Eligible

10 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 44FR357 Multi- Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR Avoid None component (9/2015) Unevaluated (12/30/15)No Avoided Effect Avoided Potentially Eligible 44FR360 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (9/2015) Will (12/30/15) Pending camp Recommend Potentially VDHR Not Eligible EligiblePendi Concurrence Pending ng Test Phase II Report SubmittalUne valuated 44FR363 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (9/2015) Will (12/30/15) Pending camp Recommend Potentially VDHR Not Eligible Eligible Concurrence Pending Test Phase II Pending Report Submittal Unevaluated 44FR364 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (9/2015) Not Eligible (12/30/15) lithic scatter within LOD NO Effect within LOD 44FR365 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (9/2015) Will (12/30/15) Pending camp Recommend Potentially VDHR Not Eligible Eligible Concurrence Pending Test Phase II Pemding Report Submittal Unevaluated 44FR366 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (9/2015) Will (12/30/15) Pending camp Recommend Potentially VDHR Not Eligible EligiblePendi Concurrence Pending ng Test Phase II Report Submittal Unevaluated

11 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 44FR367 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (9/2015) Not Eligible (12/30/15) lithic scatter within LOD NO Effect within LOD 44FR368 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (9/2015) Unevaluated (12/30/15) Pending camp Avoided Potentially VDHR Eligible Concurrence Test Pending No Effect Avoided 44FR369 Historic Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None farmstead (9/2015) Unevaluated Pending Pending Avoided No Effect VDHR Avoided(12/3 Concurrence 0/15) Test Potentially Eligible 44FR370 Multi- Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR None component (9/2015) Tetra Tech (12/30/15) Pending will Potentially VDHR Recommend Eligible Concurrence Eligible Test Pending Avoided 44FR371 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American (9/2015) Unevaluated Pending Pending camp Avoided No Effect VDHR Avoided Concurrence Avoid 44FR372 Multi- Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None component (9/2015) Will (12/30/15) Pending Recommend Potentially VDHR Not Eligible Eligible Concurrence Pending Avoid Phase II Pending Report SubmittalUne valuated 44FR373 Multi- Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None component (9/2015) Will (12/30/15) Pending Recommend Potentially VDHR Not Eligible Eligible Concurrence Pending Test Phase II Pending Report SubmittalUne valuated

12 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 44FR376 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report and Pending Phase II Phase II Report Report 44FR377 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR Pending American Pending Phase II Review lithic scatter Phase IB Fieldwork to Pending Addendum be scheduled Report and Phase II Report 44FR384 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Unevaluated Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Avoided Pending VDHR Addendum Concurrence Report and Phase II Report 44FR385 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report and Phase IB Phase II Addendum Report Report and Phase II Report 44FR386 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report and Phase IB Phase II Addendum Report Report and Phase II Report 44FR389 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report Pending Phase IB Addendum Report Submittal

13 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 44FR390 Historic Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None Midden Pending Will Review Pending Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report Pending Phase IB Addendum Report Submittal 44FR391 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report and Pending Phase II Phase II Report Report 44FR392 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Eligible Concurrence Report and Pending Phase II Phase II Report Report 44FR393 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report and Pending Phase II Phase II Report Report 44FR394 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report and Pending Phase II Phase II Report Report 44FR395 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Unevaluated Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Avoided Pending VDHR Addendum Concurrence Report and Phase II Report

14 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 44FR396 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report and Pending Phase II Phase II Report Report 44FR397 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report and Pending Phase II Phase II Report Report 44FR399 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report and Pending Phase II Phase II Report Report 44FR400 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Unevaluated Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Avoided Pending VDHR Addendum Concurrence Report and Phase II Report 44FR401 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report and Pending Phase II Phase II Report Report 44FR403 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR Pending American Pending Phase II Review Evaluation lithic scatter Phase IB Scheduled Pending and VDHR Addendum Review Report 44FR404 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR Pending American Pending Phase II Review Evaluation lithic scatter Phase IB Scheduled Pending and VDHR Addendum Review Report

15 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 44FR405 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR Pending American Pending Phase II Review Evaluation lithic scatter Phase IB Scheduled Pending and VDHR Addendum Review Report 44FR406 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR Pending American Pending Phase II Review Evaluation lithic scatter Phase IB Scheduled Pending and VDHR Addendum Review Report 44FR407 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR None American Pending Avoided Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Pending VDHR Addendum Concurrence Report 44FR408 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report 44FR409 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR Pending American Pending Review Evaluation lithic scatter Phase IB Pending and VDHR Addendum Review Report 44FR191 Native Franklin, VA Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American Pending Will Review Pending lithic scatter Phase IB Recommend Pending VDHR Addendum Not Eligible Concurrence Report and Pending Phase II Phase II Report Report Clear View Historic Franklin, VA New South Potentially VDHR Effects Dairy Farm farmstead Associates Eligible (1/6/16) Assessment (33-5304) (ca.1913) (109/2015) Unevaluated Potentially Additional Eligible research Undetermine d Phase II 33-5325 Historic Franklin, VA New South Potentially VDHR Effects house Associates Eligible (1/6/16) Assessment (ca. 1934) (910/2015) Unevaluated Undetermine Additional d researchSEA Potentially RCH Eligible Phase II

16 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 33-5329 Historic Franklin, VA New South Unevaluated VDHR Additional farmstead Associates Potentially (1/6/16) research (ca. 1850) (910/2015) Eligible Undetermine Effects dotentially Assessment Eligible Phase II Flora Farm Historic Franklin, VA New South Potentially VDHR Additional 33-389 farmstead Associates eligible (1/6/16) research (ca. 1824) (610/2016) Potentially Effects Eligible Assessment Phase II; VDHR 5/25/2016 ListedPendin g Farm Farm Franklin, VA New South 33-5377 Associates Outbuildings Outbuildings Franklin, VA New South 33-5378 Associates House House Franklin, VA New South 33-5383 Associates House Historic Franklin, VA New South Potentially VDHR Effects 33-5398 house Associates eligible (1/6/16) Assessment (ca. 1870) (6/2016) Potentially Additional Eligible research Phase II Pending House Historic Franklin, VA New South Potentially VDHR Effects 33-5400 house Associates eligible (1/6/16) Assessment (ca.1850) (6/2016) Potentially Additional Eligible research Phase II Pending Edwards Historic Franklin, VA New South Unevaluated VDHR Pending cemetery cemetery AssociatesP Avoided Review Evaluation (33-5403) ending Pending and VDHR Addendum Review; Report Avoid Ruin Historic ruin Franklin, VA New South Unevaluated VDHR Pending (33-5408) Associates Pending Evaluation Pending and VDHR Addendum Review Report

17 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) Historic Historic Franklin, VA New South Unevaluated VDHR Pending structure structure AssociatesP Review Evaluation (33-5409) ending Pending and VDHR Addendum Review Report Cemetery Historic Franklin, VA New South Unevaluated VDHR None (VA-FR-S- Cemetery AssociatesP Avoided Review Pending 507) ending Pending VDHR Addendum Concurrence Report Well house Historic Franklin, VA New South Unevaluated VDHR Pending (33-5410) structure AssociatesP Review Evaluation ending Pending and VDHR Addendum Review Report 44PY417 Historic Pittsylvania, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None artifact VA (7/2015) Will Review Pending scatter Recommend PendingVDH VDHR Not Eligible R (10/27/15) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Test Phase II ReportUneva luated 44PY418 Native Pittsylvania, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American VA (7/2015) Will Review Pending camp Recommend PendingVDH VDHR Not Eligible R (10/27/15) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Test Phase II ReportUneva luated 44PY419 Native Pittsylvania, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American VA (7/2015) Will Review Pending camp Recommend PendingVDH VDHR Not Eligible R (10/27/15) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Test Phase II ReportUneva luated 44PY421 Historic Pittsylvania, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None artifact VA (7/2015) Will Review Pending scatter Recommend PendingVDH VDHR Not Eligible R (10/27/15) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Avoid/Test Phase II portion in ReportUneva LOD luated

18 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 44PY422 Native Pittsylvania, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American VA (7/2015) Will Review Pending camp Recommend PendingVDH VDHR Not Eligible R (10/27/15) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Test Phase II ReportUneva luated 44PY424 Native Pittsylvania, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American VA (7/2015) Will Review Pending camp Recommend PendingVDH VDHR Not Eligible R (10/27/15) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Test Phase II ReportUneva luated 44PY425 Native Pittsylvania, Tetra Tech Tetra Tech VDHR None American VA (7/2015) Will Review Pending camp Recommend PendingVDH VDHR Not Eligible R (10/27/15) Concurrence Pending Unevaluated Test Phase II ReportUneva luated 44PY427 Historic Pittsylvania, Tetra Tech Unevaluated VDHR Avoid artifact VA (7/2015) (10/27/15) scatter & Unevaluated unmarked cemetery Oak Grove Historic Pittsylvania, New South Potentially VDHR Additional Christian church & VA Associates eligible (10/22/15) research Church cemetery (68/2016) Potentially Effects 71-5483 (ca. 1900) Eligible Assessment Phase II Pending 071-5255 Cemetery Pittsylvania, New South VA Associates 071-5515 Farm 071-5465 Baltimore Railroad Webster, WV Tetra Tech Not Eligible WVDCH None and Ohio 11/2016 (Pending) pending Railroad WVDCH (Field No. concurrence 258) Roby Family Cemetery Braxton, WV Tetra Tech Not Eligible WVDCH None Cemetery 11/2016 (Pending) pending (Field No. WVDCH 257) concurrence

19 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) Watson Cemetery Doddridge, Tetra Tech Not Eligible WVDCH None Property WV 11/2016 (Pending) pending Cemetery WVDCH (Field concurrence No.256) Big Stony Rural historic Giles, VA New South Eligible VDHR Special Creek Rural district Associates (5/25/16) construction Historic (ca.1890- (3/2016) Eligible techniques District ca.1930) and

035-5127 avoidance of resources in the district; Effects assessment Coles-Terry Rural historic Roanoke, V Unknown Eligible VDHR Special Rural district A (5/25/16) construction Historic Eligible techniques District and 080-5689 avoidance of resources in the district; Effects assessment Bent Rural historic Roanoke, VA New South Eligible VDHR Effects Mountain district Associates (5/25/16) assessment Rural (ca.1850- (3/2015) Eligible Historic 1900) District 080-5677 46WZ153- Cemetery Wetzel, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None CEM (10/2016) Unevaluated No Effect Avoided Pending

46WZ136- CEM 46WZ149 Historic Harrison, WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None Industrial (10/2016) Unevaluated No Effect Avoided Pending 46HS140 Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None 10/2016 Unevaluated No Effect Avoided Pending WV-HA-027 Modern Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None No SHPO ID Burial 10/2016 Not Eligible No Effect Stillborn by 50 year Avoided Infant rule Pending

20 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) 46WB405 Native Webster, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None American 10/2016 Unevaluated No Effect Lithic Scatter Avoided Pending WV-WB-3101 Native Webster, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH Pending Pending American Pending Pending SHPO ID Camp Phase II Review results 46WB404- Cemetery Webster, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None CEM 10/2016 Unevaluated No Effect Avoided Pending WV-BX-3106 Historic Braxton, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None Pending 10/2016 Unevaluated No Effect SHPO ID Avoided Pending 46BX126- Cemetery Braxton, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None CEM 10/2016 Unevaluated No Effect Avoided Pending 46BX127- Cemetery Braxton, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None CEM 10/2016 Unevaluated No Effect Avoided Pending 46BX129 Cemetery Braxton, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None Roby CEM 10/2016 Unevaluated No Effect Avoided Pending 46NI846 Native Nicholas. WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None American (11/2016) Reecommen No Effect Pending Lithic Scatter d Eligible Avoided WVDCH Avoided Pending Concurrence 46NI847 Native Nicholas. WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None American (11/2016) Recommend No Effect Pending Lithic Scatter Eligible Avoided WVDCH Avoided Pending Concurrence 46NI848 Native Nicholas. WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None American (11/2016) Unevaluated No Effect Pending Lithic Scatter Avoided WVDCH Pending Concurrence WV-NI-040- Cemetery Nicholas. WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None CEM (11/2016) Unevaluated No Effect Pending Pending Avoided WVDCH SHPO ID Pending Concurrence WV-NI-045 Native Nicholas. WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None Pending American (11/2016) Recommend No Effect Pending SHPO ID Camp Eligible Avoided WVDCH Pending Concurrence WV-NI-046 Native Nicholas. WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None Pending American (11/2016) Recommend No Effect Pending SHPO ID Camp Eligible Avoided WVDCH Pending Concurrence

21 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) WV-NI-047 Native Nicholas. WV Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH None Pending American (11/2016 Recommend No Effect Pending SHPO ID Lithic Scatter Not Eligible Avoided WVDCH Pending Concurrence WV-GB-027 Native Greenbrier. Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH Pending American WV (11/2016 Currently No Pending Camp Access WV-GB-030 Historic Greenbrier. Tetra Tech Tetra Tech WVDCH Pending Prehistoric WV (11/2016 Historic Pending Component Recommend Not Eligible Prehistoric Eligible but avoided WV-FA-002A Native Fayette, WV Tetra Tech TetraTech WVDCH None American (11/2016) Unevaluated No Effect Pending Litic Scatter Avoided Avoided WVDCH Pending Concurrence 46SU732- Cemetery Summers, SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None CEM WV (11/2016) Unevaluated No Effect Pending Avoided WVDCH Pending Concurrence WVSU3202/3 Native Summers, SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None 203 American WV (11/2016) Not Eligible No Effect Pending Pending Lithic Scatter Pending WVDCH SHPO ID Concurrence WV-SU-1403 Native Summers, SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None American WV (11/2016) Unevaluated No Effect Pending Camp Avoided WVDCH Pending Concurrence WV-SU-1404 Native Summers, SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None American WV 11/2016 Unevaluated No Effect Pending Camp Avoided WVDCH Pending Concurrence WV-SU-1405 Native Summers, SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None American WV 11/2016 Not Eligible No Effect Pending Lithic Scatter Pending WVDCH Concurrence WV-ME-2101 Historic Monroe, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None 11/2016 Not Eligible No Effect Pending Pending WVDCH Concurrence WV-ME-2401 Historic Monroe, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None 11/2016 Not Eligible No Effect Pending Pending WVDCH Concurrence WV-ME-2402 Prehistoric Monroe, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None 11/2016 Not Eligible No Effect Pending Pending WVDCH Concurrence

22 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.10.9-1 {Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Cultural Resources Within the Direct Area of Potential Effect for the Mountain Valley Project that are Unevaluated, May Be Eligible, or Listed on the NRHP Recorder/ Company SHPO Site No./ Cultural County/ Future Company NRHP Opinion Name Type State Work (date) Evaluation (date) WV-ME-3204 Historic Monroe, WV SEARCH SEARCH WVDCH None 11/2016 Not Eligible No Effect Pending Pending WVDCH Concurrence

23 of 23 DEIS TABLE 4.11.1-5 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Projected Route)

Estimated Construction Emissions for the Mountain Valley Project Annual Pollutant Emissions (tpy)

Emission Source a/ NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 VOC GHG b/ Year 1 Construction Emissions Pipeline (MP 0.0 – MP 135) c/ Construction Equipment 17.414 171.61 2.0 2.75 2.75 17.515 7,504.249 .2 68.8 .9 9.6 Commuting Vehicles 4.0 0.4 Fugitive Dust Open Burning 12.6 432.3 67.9 44.2 36.5 10,080.5 Year 1 Total Emissions (tpy) 30.026 603.96 2.0 74.63 47.31 54.052 17,584.75 .8 01.1 .4 80.1 Year 2 Construction Emissions Pipeline (MP 0.0 – MP 301) d/ Construction Equipment 741.1, 1,372.9 65.1160. 107.8256. 107.82 151.83 238,062.8 619.0 3,190.2 5 3 56.3 53.6 597,304.7 Commuting Vehicles 188.53 102.3 01.7 1,383.63, 141.33 18.042 95,503.42 84.9 251.8 566.4 62.5 .8 29,037.1 Fugitive Dust 122374.4 55.315 7.6 Open Burning 11.0 377.45 59.3 38.6 31.8 8,802.2 Bradshaw Compressor Station Construction Equipment 91.080 108.09 6.65 12.82 12.82 1615.5 25,433.44 .5 9.5 32.0 Commuting Vehicles 0.65 3.1 <0.1 0.6 0.1 0.2 395.6 Fugitive Dust 1.12 0.5 Harris Compressor Station Construction Equipment 80.270 95.287. 5.87 11.210.8 11.210. 14.613 22,363.53 .9 8 8 .7 62.2 Commuting Vehicles 0.65 3.1 <0.1 0.6 0.1 0.2 395.6 Fugitive Dust 1.1 0.5 Stallworth Compressor Station Construction Equipment 80.271 95.287. 5.87 11.210.8 11.210. 14.613 22,363.53 .0 7 8 .7 62.2 Commuting Vehicles 0.65 3.21 <0.1 0.6 0.1 0.2 395.6 Fugitive Dust 1.1 0.5 Mobley Interconnect Construction Equipment 19.917 22.821. 1.3 2.54 2.54 3.64 5,033.54 .8 2 Commuting Vehicles 0.5 3.1 <0.1 0.6 0.1 0.2 395.6 Fugitive Dust 1.1 0.5 Sherwood Interconnect Construction Equipment 17.8 21.2 1.3 2.4 2.4 3.4 5,033.4 Commuting Vehicles 0.3 1.8 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 0.1 230.8

1 of 3 Fugitive Dust 0.2 0.1 Sherwood Interconnect Construction Equipment 19.9 22.8 1.3 2.5 2.5 3.6 5,033.5 Commuting VehiclesFugitive 0.3 1.8 <0.1 0.31 <0.1 0.1 230.8 Dust Fugitive Dust 0.2 0.1

DEIS TABLE 4.11.1-5 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Projected Route)

Estimated Construction Emissions for the Mountain Valley Project Annual Pollutant Emissions (tpy)

Emission Source a/ NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 VOC GHG b/ WB Interconnect Construction Equipment 19.917. 22.821. 1.3 2.54 2.54 3.64 5,036.32 8 2 Commuting Vehicles 0.3 1.8 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 <0.1 230.8 Fugitive Dust 0.2 0.1 0.1 Year 2 Total Emissions (tpy) 1,254.2 2,234.3 88.1 1,722.3 387.9 258.8 429,511.2 Year 3 Construction Emissions Pipeline (MP 0.0 – MP 301) d/ Construction Equipment 959.2 1,771.4 94.1 151.0 151.0 198.9 349,695.6 Commuting Vehicles 222.4 146.0 1.0 2,095.6 212.9 24.8 132,266.4 Fugitive Dust 193.2 70.6 Roanoke Compressor StationInterconnect Construction Equipment 17.808 21.192 1.303 2.374 2.374 3.374 5,036.92 Commuting Vehicles 0.293 1.677 <0.101 0.263 <0.1 0.101 230.8 Fugitive Dust 0.162 0.1 Transco Interconnect Construction Equipment 17.8 21.2 1.3 2.4 2.4 3.4 5,036.2 Commuting Vehicles 0.3 1.7 <0.1 0.3 <0.1 0.1 230.8 Fugitive Dust 0.163 0.1 Year 32 Total Emissions 1,217.8 1,963.0 97186. 2,495.4,31 439.586 230.64 492,496.0 (tpy) 2,329.5 4,219.4 7 0.9 3.4 88.9 932,981.2 Year 43 Construction Emissions Pipeline (MP 135 – MP 301) e/ Construction Equipment 14.1 220.7 2.6 3.0 3.0 18.8 9,990.1 Commuting Vehicles 1.4 26.2 <0.1 58.6 5.9 1.1 1,592.8 Fugitive Dust Year 43 Total Emissions 15.5 246.9 2.6 61.6 8.9 19.9 11,582.9 (tpy) fc/ a/ Emission sources for each project component are sorted by type of construction activity, as follows: Construction equipment include tailpipe emissions from heavy equipment; Commuting Vehicles include fugitives from on-road and off-road vehicle travel; Fugitive Dust includes fugitive dust from earthmoving fugitives and wind erosion, and Open Burning includes fugitives from burning of brush and slash from clearing. b/ GHG includes only CO2 emissions.

2 of 3 c/ Pipeline emissions are total emissions from all segments covered as indicated in the pipeline milepost numbers. These include pipeline construction in seven counties in West Virginia (Wetzel, Harrison, Doddridge, Lewis, Braxton, Webster, and Nicholas). d/ Pipeline emissions are total emissions from all segments covered as indicated in the pipeline milepost numbers. These include pipeline construction in 11 counties in West Virginia (Wetzel, Harrison, Doddridge, Lewis, Braxton, Webster, Nicholas, Greenbrier, Fayette, Summers, and Monroe) and six counties in Virginia (Giles, Craig, Montgomery, Roanoke, Franklin, and Pittsylvania). e/ Pipeline emissions are total emissions from all segments covered as indicated in the pipeline milepost numbers. These include pipeline construction in four counties in West Virginia (Greenbrier, Fayette, Summers, and Monroe) and six counties in Virginia (Giles, Craig, Montgomery, Roanoke, Franklin, and Pittsylvania). fc/ According to Mountain Valley, right-of-way restoration may occur in the first quarter of Year 43. Note: Mountain Valley estimates that limited pre-construction emissions would occur in Year 1 due to use of pickup trucks and ATVs.

3 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.12.1-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Lengths of Area Classifications Crossed by the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project State/County Class 1 (miles) Class 2 (miles) Class 3 (miles) MOUNTAIN VALLEY PROJECT West Virginia Braxton 14.714.8 0.0 0.0 Doddridge 3.63.4 1.31.5 0.0 Fayette 0.5 0.0 0.0 Greenbrier 19.920.3 1.41.3 0.0 Harrison 22.5 1.1 0.0 Lewis 27.5 0.0 0.0 Monroe 21.2 0.8 0.0 Nicholas 22.521.2 2.23.6 0.0 Summers 14.014.6 2.72.2 0.0 Webster 28.428.6 1.61.8 0.0 Wetzel 9.69.5 0.0 0.0 West Virginia Total 184.3183.9 11.112.4 0.0 Virginia Craig 1.7 0.0 0.0 Franklin 27.429.0 9.28.5 0.10.0 Giles 17.017.2 3.0 0.10.3 Montgomery 15.513.7 3.55.7 0.0 Pittsylvania 17.217.8 2.81.7 0.0 Roanoke 7.27.4 1.11.2 0.0 Virginia Total 86.086.7 19.620.2 0.20.3 Mountain Valley Project Total 270.3270.6 30.632.6 0.20.3 EQUITRANS EXPANSION PROJECT Pennsylvania 5.7 2.2 0.0 West Virginia 0.0 0.0 0.0 Equitrans Expansion Project Total 5.7 2.2 0.0

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.12.1-3 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Location of High Consequence Areas for the Mountain Valley Project State/County HCA Number Start MP End MP Length (miles) West Virginia Harrison 1 25.5725.42 26.0925.94 0.5 WebsterWebster, 2 109.18109.38 109.96110.19 0.8 Nicholas Nicholas 3 110.92111.14 111.45111.83 0.50.7 Nicholas 4 112.59112.93 113.30113.64 0.7 Nicholas 5 114.00114.34 114.62114.95 0.6 Nicholas 6 121.93122.24 122.39122.73 0.5 Greenbrier 7 143.60143.93 144.23144.56 0.6 Monroe 8 191.81 192.37 0.6 Virginia Monroe 8 190.87 191.43 0.6 Giles 9 202.95203.87 203.49204.41 0.5 Giles 1710 211.23206.69 212.14207.57 0.9 Giles 11 211.01 211.54 0.5 Giles 12 212.57 213.26 0.8 Montgomery 1013 233.47235.10 234.22236.03 0.80.9 Franklin 1114 257.28259.82 258.42260.96 1.1 Franklin 1215 259.13261.68 259.59262.14 0.5 Franklin 1316 262.07265.04 263.59266.76 1.51.7 Franklin 1817 264.85270.58 265.70271.34 0.90.8 Franklin 14 267.72 268.47 0.8 Pittsylvania 1518 295.59298.56 296.95299.81 1.41.3 Pittsylvania 1619 297.07299.94 297.51300.37 0.4

1 of 1 DEIS TABLE 4.13.1-1 (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Affected HUC10 Watersheds Affected by the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project and Other Projects Percent of Activity Acres Watershed MOUNTAIN VALLEY PROJECT West Virginia Watershed: Fishing Creek 139,636 Other Identified Projects a/ 3,366.8 2.4 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 235.1245.7 0.2 Watershed: Tenmile Creek 79,898 Other Identified Projects a/ 5,797.8 7.5 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 463.1464.4 0.6 Watershed: Headwaters Middle Island Creek 125,797 Other Identified Projects a/ 11,780.7 9.4 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 76.879.7 0.1 Watershed: Middle West Fork River 134,806 Other Identified Projects a/ 11,643.7 8.6 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 168.7183.7 0.1 Watershed: Leading Creek 93,239 Other Identified Projects a/ 7,289.0 7.8 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 72.073.8 0.1 Watershed: Upper West Fork River 111,324 Other Identified Projects a/ 6,423.3 5.8 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 22.43 0.02 Watershed: Sand Fork 51,305 Other Identified Projects a/ 5,460.9 10.6 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 199.57.0 0.4 Watershed: Upper Little Kanawha River 199,843 Other Identified Projects a/ 9,171.6 4.6 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 4181.18 0.2 Watershed: Holly River 94,833 Other Identified Projects a/ 69.8 0.1 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 168.57.9 0.2 Watershed: Middle Elk River 179,131 Other Identified Projects a/ 977.5 0.5 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 169.18.4 0.1 Watershed: Laurel Creek 42,604 Other Identified Projects a/ 338.4 0.8 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 235.026.1 0.56 Watershed: Birch River 90,848 Other Identified Projects a/ 948.3 1.0 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 79.898.9 0.1

1 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.13.1-1 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Affected HUC10 Watersheds Affected by the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project and Other Projects Percent of Activity Acres Watershed Watershed: Headwaters Gauley River 86,241 Other Identified Projects a/ 24.1 0.02 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 116.54.4 0.1 Watershed: Outlet Gauley River 216,847 Other Identified Projects a/ 3,304.5 1.5 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 238.84.6 0.1 Watershed: Hominy Creek 66,041 Other Identified Projects a/ 71.7 0.1 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 314.99.4 0.5 Watershed: Meadow River 233,528 Other Identified Projects a/ 1,676.8 0.7 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 526.416.8 0.2 Watershed: Glade Creek-New River 172,268 Other Identified Projects a/ 8.8 0.01 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 107.45.2 0.1 Watershed: Wolf Creek-Greenbrier River 203,209 Other Identified Projects a/ No other projects identified NA b/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 331.656.7 0.2 Watershed: Indian Creek 123,530 Other Identified Projects a/ No other projects identified NA b/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 193.35.6 0.2 Watershed: East River-New River 107,883 Other Identified Projects a/ No other projects identified NA b/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 82.0109.1 0.1 Virginia Watershed: Sinking Creek-New River 126,574 Other Identified Projects a/ No other projects identified NA b/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 432.407.0 0.3 Watershed: Upper Craig Creek 71,468 Other Identified Projects a/ No other projects identified NA b/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 35.035.9 0.105 Watershed: East River-New River 107,883 Other Identified Projects a/ No other projects identified NA b/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 109.122.3 0.10.02 Watershed: North Fork Roanoke River 73,974 Other Identified Projects a/ 6.1 0.01 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 277.21.6 0.4

2 of 3 DEIS TABLE 4.13.1-1 (continued) (Updated for MVP October 2016 Proposed Route)

Affected HUC10 Watersheds Affected by the Mountain Valley Project and the Equitrans Expansion Project and Other Projects Percent of Activity Acres Watershed Watershed: Mason Creek-Roanoke River 59,357 Other Identified Projects a/ No other projects identified NA b/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 116.825.3 0.2 Watershed: South Fork Roanoke River 88,626 Other Identified Projects a/ 6.3 0.01 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 129.119.9 0.1 Watershed: Upper Blackwater River 104,641 Other Identified Projects a/ No other projects identified NA b/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 432.98 0.4 Watershed: Lower Blackwater River 73,204 Other Identified Projects a/ 7,043.0 c/ 9.6 c/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 139.541.1 0.2 Watershed: Upper Pigg River 132,025 Other Identified Projects a/ No other projects identified NA b/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 117.216 0.1 Watershed: Lower Pigg River 52,866 Other Identified Projects a/ 158 c/ 0.3 c/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 178.56.9 0.3 Watershed: Stinking River-Banister River 148,877 Other Identified Projects a/ 79.9 0.1 MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 49.32.6 0.03 Watershed: Cherrystone Creek-Banister River 88,668 Other Identified Projects a/ No other projects identified NA b/ MVP pipeline and Associated Facilities 160.9182.8 0.2 EQUITRANS EXPANSION PROJECT Watershed: South Fork Tenmile Creek 115,200 Other Identified Projects a/ 3.5 0.003 Equitrans Expansion Project and Associated Facilities 2.4 0.002 Watershed: Lower Monongahela 869,442 Other Identified Projects a/ 3,589.5 0.4 Equitrans Expansion Project and Associated Facilities 71.3 0.008 Watershed: Fishing Creek 139,636 Other Identified Projects a/ 3,366.8 2.4 Equitrans Expansion Project and Associated Facilities 52.4 0.04 a/ Includes estimated values. b/ Not applicable - No other projects identified in the watershed. c/ Acres are surface water associated with Smith Mountain and Leesville Lakes. No ground disturbance will result from this project, therefore not counted as an impact to the watershed.

3 of 3