DOCSLIB.ORG

(718) 624-7200 [email protected] 1 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 1 CITY OF NEW YORK 2 2012-2013 3 REDISTRICTING COMMISSION 4 SECOND ROUND PUBLIC MEETING 5 Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture 6 515 Malcolm X Boulevard 7 New York, New York 10037 8 October 4, 2012 5:30 P.M. 9 10 IN ATTENDANCE: 11 BENITO ROMANO, Chairperson 12 THADDEUS HACKWORTH, General Counsel 13 FRANK PATAVAN (R-QUEENS) 14 MADELINE PROVENZANO (D-BRONX) 15 JUSTIN YU (D-NEW YORK) 16 OSCAR ODOM, III (R-KINGS) 17 LINDA LIN (D-QUEENS) 18 ROBERT W. HART (D-RICHMOND) 19 GLORIA CARVAJAL WOLFE (R-NEW YORK) 20 ROXANE PERSAUD (D-KINGS) 21 THOMAS OGNIBENE (R-QUEENS) 22 KAMILLAH HANKS (I-RICHMOND) 23 SCOTT CERULLO (R-RICHMOND) 24 25 DIAMOND REPORTING (718) 624-7200 [email protected] 1 2 1 S P E A K E R S: 2 James Hong, Daniel M. Cohen, William Stanford, Elisa M. 3 Cose, Maya Nichlaus, Sofia Krulivitch, Isaac Gluck, Henry 4 Calderon, Rebecca Mayfield, Melissa Mark-Viverito, Julius 5 Tajiddin, Herman Francis, Margaret Fung, Gloria A. 6 Kerstein, (P. Eggers by Mei Gellert) Branca Vasquez, Peggy 7 Morales, Rachel Fauss, Viveca Diaz, Yma Rodriguz, Raul 8 Reyes (via translator), Ydanis Rodriquez, Agnes Rivera, 9 Inez Dickens, Belina Anderson, Melissa Mark-Viverito, 10 Robert Jackson, Debbie Quinones, Ruben Dario Vargas, Harry 11 Rodriguez, Keith Wright, M. Ndigo Washington, Esmeralda 12 Simmons, Rosie Mendez, Margaret Chin, Edwin Marcial, David 13 Nocenti, Gustavo Rosado, Joan Levine, Madelyn Innocent, 14 Roberto Anazaghati, Curtis Arluck, Henrietta Lyle, Sarah 15 Martin, Laura Friedman, Brian Paul, Mark Levine, Elizabeth 16 Kellner, Tiena Traversa, Maritta Dunn, Judy Iason, 17 Elizabeth L. Ritter, Adian Mack, Alex Castex-Porter. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 DIAMOND REPORTING (718) 624-7200 [email protected] 2 3 DISTRICTING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING 1 CHAIRPERSON ROMANO: Good evening everyone. 2 Good evening. 3 And thank you for coming tonight and welcome 4 to the second round of the New York City 5 Districting Commission public hearings, this one 6 in Manhattan. 7 My name is Benito Romano and I am the Chair 8 of the New York City Districting Commission, and 9 on behalf of the Commission I want to thank the 10 Director of the Schomberg Center for hosting us 11 here tonight. 12 We have the facility only a few hours, and I 13 want to make sure that we hear from everyone who 14 has signed up and pre-registered. 15 For those of you who did not sign up, and 16 wish to speak, please see the staff at the 17 registration table outside of this room to 18 register. 19 If you require a translation for your 20 testimony, please let the staff at registration 21 desk know. They will ensure that a translator 22 will be provided to you when it is your turn to 23 testify. 24 Before we take testimony I would like to 25 make a few observations. At the beginning of DIAMOND REPORTING (718) 624-7200 [email protected] 3 4 DISTRICTING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING 1 this month the Commission advertised in community 2 and ethnic newspapers announcing the Commission's 3 public hearing schedule. 4 An e-mail blast was sent to over 5,500 5 individuals and organizations, various advocacy 6 groups helped spread the word throughout their 7 individual networks, and the hearing schedule was 8 publicized on our Face Book page and Twitter 9 feed. 10 We will continue to find other ways to 11 maximize community participation and interest, 12 and it looks from today's audience like we are 13 succeeding. 14 Tonight represents the second round of 15 public hearings that the Commission will conduct 16 throughout the City. 17 Over 450 people attended our first round of 18 hearings in late August and the Commission heard 19 from more than 131 individuals. Since then the 20 Commission has released a preliminary draft 21 Council district plan on September 4th that 22 adjusted the current Council lines for population 23 proportionality because in the last ten years 24 many Council districts have either increased or 25 decreased in population creating a significant DIAMOND REPORTING (718) 624-7200 [email protected] 4 5 DISTRICTING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING 1 deviation from the ideal Council district 2 population of 160,710. 3 The preliminary draft plan was also posted 4 on the Commission's Website 5 WWW.NYC.gov/districting, it was also displayed in 6 public areas in Brooklyn, like such as Brooklyn's 7 Borough Hall, the Queens Library and the District 8 Commission offices here in Manhattan and linked 9 to other Web sites such as the New York City 10 Public Library. 11 On the same day the Commission also launched 12 an online mapping tool to allow the public to 13 draw Council district maps for the Commission's 14 consideration. 15 The Commission's map also opened the 16 resource room at the Commission's offices in 17 lower Manhattan. 18 The resource room is available for those 19 without access to computer terminals, who wish to 20 draw and submit a map to the Commission or for 21 those wishing to receive one-on-one assistance 22 with map drawing as the resource room is staffed 23 by Justin Bassett, our mapping associate. 24 The room is also, is by appointment only but 25 it does operate past normal business hours. The DIAMOND REPORTING (718) 624-7200 [email protected] 5 6 DISTRICTING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING 1 Commission has received a few maps so far and we 2 encourage you to explore the mapping tool 3 available on our Website. You will also be able 4 to see some of the maps submitted by some of the 5 members of the public. 6 Finally, the Commission has launched a 7 speakers bureau where an organization or group 8 can request a staff member to talk about the 9 decennial districting process. 10 So far the speakers bureau has addressed a 11 number of civic organizations, community boards 12 and even a grade school class. 13 If there is any one wishing to have a 14 speakers bureau attend to address their group, or 15 organization, please see Jonathan Ettricks or 16 Carlos Carino to set up an appointment. 17 The Commission is eager to hear tonight the 18 testimony and comments on the preliminary draft 19 plan. 20 After tonight's hearing, and the others in 21 the second round of hearings the Commission will 22 consider the comments during its next scheduled 23 public meeting on October 18th. At that meeting 24 the Commission will direct the staff to revise 25 the preliminary district plan in response to DIAMOND REPORTING (718) 624-7200 [email protected] 6 7 DISTRICTING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING 1 comments we receive during the second round. 2 Then at the Commission's public meeting on 3 October 30, a revised plan reflecting the 4 comments received will be presented to the 5 Commission and the Commission will decide whether 6 to adopt the plan. If the Commission adopts the 7 plan, it will then be delivered to the City 8 Council for its inspection and approval, which 9 has to occur by November 5th. 10 According to the City Charter by November 11 26, the City Council must, we must submit it by 12 -- (Inaudible) -- but according to the City 13 Council, the City Council has until November 26th 14 to either adopt the revised district plan at 15 which point the plan will then be filed with the 16 City Clerk or the Council can object and revise 17 the district plan, at which point the plan will 18 be returned to the Commission with the Council's 19 comments and concerns. 20 If the Commission takes neither action it 21 will be deemed adopted. 22 If the Council objects to the revised 23 district plan, the Commission will then have 24 until January 5, 2013, to create a revised plan. 25 This will then trigger a new set of public DIAMOND REPORTING (718) 624-7200 [email protected] 7 8 DISTRICTING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING 1 hearings to receive comment and feedback on that 2 revised plan. 3 The Commission will then have until March 4 5th to create, adopt and submit a final plan to 5 the City Clerk and the U.S. Department of Justice 6 for pre-clearance under the voting rights act. 7 This process is described in a flow chart 8 that is available for you tonight, as it was 9 during the first round of hearings. Other 10 handouts include a copy of the preliminary draft 11 plan, and a large map of Manhattan about the 12 preliminary draft map lines and a listing of 13 public participation tools that are available. 14 It is worth reviewing again that there are 15 certain factors the law obligates the Commission 16 to consider during the districting process: 17 These include the difference in population 18 between the least populous and the most populous 19 districts shall not exceed 10 percent of the 20 average population for all districts. 21 The plan must maintain fair and effective 22 representation of racial and language minority 23 groups in New York City. 24 The plan must keep neighborhoods and 25 communities with established ties of common DIAMOND REPORTING (718) 624-7200 [email protected] 8 9 DISTRICTING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING 1 interest and association intact. 2 The plan must provide districts that are 3 compact and contiguous.
Recommended publications
  • Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of James B. Comey, Jr., to Be Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

    Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of James B. Comey, Jr., to Be Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

    S. HRG. 113–850 CONFIRMATION HEARING ON THE NOMINATION OF JAMES B. COMEY, JR., TO BE DIRECTOR OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 9, 2013 Serial No. J–113–19 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 23–750 PDF WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California CHUCK GRASSLEY, Iowa, Ranking Member CHUCK SCHUMER, New York ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah DICK DURBIN, Illinois JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota JOHN CORNYN, Texas AL FRANKEN, Minnesota MICHAEL S. LEE, Utah CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware TED CRUZ, Texas RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut JEFF FLAKE, Arizona MAZIE HIRONO, Hawaii KRISTINE LUCIUS, Chief Counsel and Staff Director KOLAN DAVIS, Republican Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) C O N T E N T S JULY 9, 2013, 10:03 A.M. STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Grassley, Hon. Chuck, a U.S. Senator from the State of Iowa ............................ 3 Leahy, Hon. Patrick J., a U.S. Senator from the State of Vermont .................... 1 prepared statement .......................................................................................... 87 PRESENTER Blumenthal, Hon. Richard, a U.S. Senator from the State of Connecticut ........ 6 STATEMENT OF THE NOMINEE Witness List ............................................................................................................. 49 Comey, James B., Jr., of Connecticut, Nominee to be Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation ......................................................................................
  • 124019NCJRS.Pdf

    124019NCJRS.Pdf

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. • • A Study of ORGANIZED CRlME BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES and Their • IMPLICATIONS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT • • Prepared for the NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE Washington, D.C. • by • Herbert Edelhertz and Thomas D. Overcast January 1990 • Northwest Policy Studies Center Kirkland, Washington • ~--------- - • • A Study of • ORGANIZED tRIME BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES and Their IMPLICATIONS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT • Prepared for the NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE Washington, D.C. I • by Herbert Edelhertz and Thomas D. Overcast • January 1990 Northwest Policy Studies Center • Kirkland, Washington This study was supported by Grant Number 87-IJ-CX-0053 awarded to the Northwest Policy Studies Center by the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, under the Omnibus Crime Control and • Safe Streets Act of 1986, as amended. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. • • • • • 124019 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent'the official position or policies of the National Institute of • Justice. Permission to reproduce this : 5 I material has been granted by Public DomainLNIJ u. S. Department of .Just; ce 10 the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). • Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS syslem requires permis· sian of the ___ owner.
  • Administrative Criminal Law & Procedure in The

    Administrative Criminal Law & Procedure in The

    Administrative Criminal Law & Procedure in the Teamsters Union: What Has Been Achieved After (Nearly) Twenty Years James B. Jacobs' Dimitri D. Portnoi tt This Article is a comprehensive case study of the most important civil RICO labor racketeeringcase in American history, U.S. v. IBT. It provides the first empirical study of the effort by DOJ and the federal courts to purge organized crime from the IBT and to reform the union so that it will be resistant to future corruption and racketeering. Drawing on 18 years of litigation generated by the effort of court-supervised monitors to enforce the 1988 settlement, it utilizes a database of all disciplinary charges brought by and the sanctions imposed by the court-supervised monitors. This Article traces the remedial phase which has generated an immense amount of litigation right up to the present andfocuses on the disciplinary (as opposed to the election) part of the remedial effort. The magnitude of this effort can hardly be exaggerated. The two remedial entities that the settlement established to enforce the consent order have expelled more than 500 officers and members from the IBT and placed some 40 IBT locals and joint councils under the internationalunion's trusteeship. This work has been accomplished via the creation of a IBT-specific criminaljustice system that has evolved into an elaborate system of procedural and substantive disciplinary law. U.S. v. t Warren E. Burger Professor of Constitutional Law and the Courts; Director, Center for Research in Crime and Justice, New York University School of Law. tt J.D. Candidate 2008, New York University School of Law; Fellow, Center for Research in Crime and Justice, New York University School of Law.
  • ANNUAL REPORT BOARD of DIRECTORS BOARD PRESIDENT and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT VICE CHAIRS John A

    ANNUAL REPORT BOARD of DIRECTORS BOARD PRESIDENT and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT VICE CHAIRS John A

    2019 ANNUAL REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD PRESIDENT and EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR’S REPORT VICE CHAIRS John A. Catsimatidis Robert J. McGuire Dear Friends, PRESIDENT The publication of the 2019 Annual Report occurs during the nationwide David J. Arena Covid-19 emergency which has deeply affected us all. Reflecting on PAL’s wonderful accomplishments of 2019 gives us reason for optimism that as HONORARY PRESIDENT we grapple with, and emerge from this pandemic, you have an institution Comm. Dermot F. Shea you can rely upon to help restore the youth and our communities to be healthy, and thriving. We feel strongly that once this medical crisis abates, VICE PRESIDENTS Richard A. Bernstein our youth will need us more than ever. Daniel Rose I hope this Annual Report gives you a taste of the unique and critical SECRETARY collaboration we have with the NYPD, and how it serves our youth and Charles A. Stillman, Esq. communities so well. I also hope you will observe how we go into some of the city’s most underserved communities, and create recreational and Barbara Taylor Bradford OBE learning experiences for children in need. PAL has been in existence for Christopher L. Canty over a century. The grit and resilience of our organization has allowed us Tony Danza Steven Fisher to endure the flu pandemic of 1918; the Great Depression; a New York Lisa M. Friel City fiscal crisis; the tragedies of September 11th; and Hurricane Sandy. John R. Greed We are prepared to endure the current crisis, and emerge stronger and Maurice R. Greenberg even more committed to our families and communities.
  • Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of Hon. Sonia Sotomayor, to Be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

    Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of Hon. Sonia Sotomayor, to Be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

    S. HRG. 111–503 CONFIRMATION HEARING ON THE NOMINATION OF HON. SONIA SOTOMAYOR, TO BE AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 13–16, 2009 Serial No. J–111–34 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:18 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 056940 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\56940.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC CONFIRMATION HEARING ON THE NOMINATION OF HON. SONIA SOTOMAYOR, TO BE AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:18 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 056940 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\56940.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC S. HRG. 111–503 CONFIRMATION HEARING ON THE NOMINATION OF HON. SONIA SOTOMAYOR, TO BE AN ASSOCIATE JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 13–16, 2009 Serial No. J–111–34 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 56–940 PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:18 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 056940 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\56940.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC PATRICK J.
  • Combating Organized Crime with Union Democracy: a Case Study of the Election Reform in United States V

    Combating Organized Crime with Union Democracy: a Case Study of the Election Reform in United States V

    Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Volume 42 Number 2 Article 2 1-1-2009 Combating Organized Crime with Union Democracy: A Case Study of the Election Reform in United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters James B. Jacobs Dimitri D. Portnoi Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation James B. Jacobs & Dimitri D. Portnoi, Combating Organized Crime with Union Democracy: A Case Study of the Election Reform in United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 42 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 335 (2009). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol42/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMBATING ORGANIZED CRIME WITH UNION DEMOCRACY: A CASE STUDY OF THE ELECTION REFORM IN UNITED STATES V. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS James B. Jacobs & Dimitri D. Portnoi* In attempting to rid the InternationalBrotherhood of Teamsters of the entrenched organized-crime influence that had controlled the union for decades, the Department of Justice's 1988 civil RICO suit against the union 's leadership initiated historic changes in how that union selects its leadership. This Article documents and analyzes the election-reform prong of the consent order that settled the RICO suit. While reformers had hoped that fair rank-and-file elections would lead to their control of the union, that has not occurred,nor have fair elections produced a model union democracy.
  • Looking out for Our Members and the Community: Continued from P.1

    Looking out for Our Members and the Community: Continued from P.1

    JANUARY 2009 | VOL.24, NO.1 Looking out for our Members IN THIS ISSUE… and the Community Professional Development Workshop Series: PATRICIA M. HYNES, PRESIDENT The Essentials In good times and bad, the New York City Bar looks out for its members back page and contributes to the greater community. In 1946, a lot of Americans were resuming careers they had put on hold to serve in World War II, including Navigating Your Career lawyers seeking to return to their profession in a world with promise of an through Troubled economic boom getting underway. The question was how to connect the Waters – How to Turn returning lawyers to new and emerging opportunities. And so the City Bar, Crisis into Opportunity along with the New York County Lawyers’ Association, started the Legal page 10 Referral Service to help with career placement. City Bar Justice Again, during the downturn of the early 1990s, the Association invigorated its efforts to help Center’s Legal Clinic lawyers in transition to enhance their career opportunities. In that process, the City Bar built for the Homeless a series of programs that assist lawyers with their career options. page 6 Today, the Association is continuing its efforts to serve its members in difficult economic times. The Legal Referral Service is greatly expanded and continues to provide opportunities for experienced Will Compliance with attorneys to build their practice, as the accompanying article illustrates. We encourage our members International Law Make to apply to the Service to be included on its panels, because you never know when someone will call Us More Secure? looking for your practice area.
  • Governor Cuomo Appoints Moreland "Commission to Investigate Public Corruption," with Attorney Ge

    Governor Cuomo Appoints Moreland "Commission to Investigate Public Corruption," with Attorney Ge

    Governor Cuomo Appoints Moreland "Commission to Investigate Public Corruption," with Attorney Ge... Page 1 of 9 Published on Governor Andrew M. Cuomo (http://www.governor.ny.gov) Home > Printer-friendly Governor Cuomo Appoints Moreland "Commission to Investigate Public Corruption," with Attorney General Schneiderman Designating Commission Members as Deputy Attorneys General Bipartisan Commission to Include Top Law Enforcement, Comprising Former US Attorneys, District Attorneys from Across the State & Policy Experts in Elections [1] Albany, NY (July 2, 2013) Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today announced the formation of the “Commission to Investigate Public Corruption” under the Moreland Act and Executive Law Section 63(8) to probe systemic public corruption and the appearance of such corruption in state government, political campaigns and elections in New York State. Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced he will appoint the members of the Commission as Deputy Attorneys General, giving the Commission broad-based authority to investigate all matters that “involve public peace, public safety, and public justice.” Under the Executive Order, the Commission will also have the power to subpoena and examine witnesses under oath as well as subpoena any necessary records. The Governor’s action follows several recent proven and alleged incidents of corruption and misconduct by public officials that have shown that current laws are inadequate and reforms are necessary to guard against abuses, ensure accountability in government, address the need
  • Crime Committee Report E.Indd

    Crime Committee Report E.Indd

    NEW YORK STATE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON CRIME VICTIMS, CRIME AND CORRECTION 2009 - 2010 REPORT Senator Ruth Hassell-Thompson, Chairwoman 36th senatorial district Jerry W. Williams Julia Long Chief of Staff Policy Analyst, ‘10 Gerard C. Savage Jacqueline Jenkins-Cox Committee Counsel & Fiscal Analyst Deputy Chief of Staff Marianne Reilly Alison E. Greene Press Secretary General Counsel & Counsel to Shirley Stingley the NYS Senate Task Force on Executive Assistant to the Senator Domestic Violence Catherine Price, MSW Jamar S. Hooks Columbia University, Fellow ’09 Exec. Dir. Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic & Asian Legislative Caucus Tanyetta Jackson, Esq. Albany Law School, Fellow ‘10 Michael Broderick Policy Analyst ‘09 With invaluable assistance from: Donna K. Drayton Ann R. Larrier Senior Executive Assistant to the Senator Community Representative Anthony C. Mitchell Carolyn D. Jones Director of District Office Operations Director of Community Affairs/ District Office Manager Kenny Agosto Special Assistant to the Senator Shelley Mayer, Chief Counsel to the Majority Conference; Maria LoGiudice, Senate Finance; Carrie Schneider, Senate Finance; Alejandra N. Paulino, Majority Counsel; Joseph Wierschem, Majority Counsel; David Evan Markus, Counsel to Conference Leader; David Neal Sellers, Counsel to Conference Leader; Katherine Grainger, Majority Counsel; Simone Levine, Majority Counsel; Maggie Williams, Majority Counsel; Indira F. Noel, Intergovernmental Affairs; Nora Niedzielski-Eichner, Majority Counsel; Katherine Mosquera, Majority Counsel; Justin Smith, Majority Counsel; Allison Kelrick, Majority Counsel; Susan Loeb, Majority Counsel; Erin Den- nin, Majority Communications; Curtis Ellis, Majority Communications; Cecilia Tkaczyk, Major- ity Counsel; Amanda Kenellis, Secretary of Senate Office; Cynthia Thomas, Majority Confer- ence Services; Tunisha Walker, Executive Director, Conference of Black Senators; Dan Salvin, Program Counsel, NYS Assembly; Tana Agostini, Policy Analyst, NYS Assembly; Samuel Morales and Conference/Majority Services.
  • Algorithms and Omertà: a Discussion of Compatibility Between Seemingly Disparate Legal Spheres

    Algorithms and Omertà: a Discussion of Compatibility Between Seemingly Disparate Legal Spheres

    University of Miami Law Review Volume 75 Number 1 Fall 2020 Article 9 12-8-2020 Algorithms and Omertà: A Discussion of Compatibility Between Seemingly Disparate Legal Spheres Cameron Chuback Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cameron Chuback, Algorithms and Omertà: A Discussion of Compatibility Between Seemingly Disparate Legal Spheres, 75 U. Miami L. Rev. 356 (2020) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol75/iss1/9 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Algorithms and Omertà: A Discussion of Compatibility Between Seemingly Disparate Legal Spheres CAMERON CHUBACK* This Note assesses the viability of federal prosecutors’ use of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) to prosecute spoofing, a market manipulating trading practice characterized by the cancellation of large orders meant to artificially alter market prices. Traditional spoofing convictions have been difficult to secure because of spoofing’s complicated and esoteric nature and difficult-to- prove elements. Now, for the first time, prosecutors in United States v. Smith have indicted alleged spoofers under RICO, which Congress designed with the intent to overcome evi- dentiary difficulties in organized crime prosecutions, partic- ularly prosecutions of the American Mafia. However, the disparity between spoofing and the Mafia’s traditional street rackets raises the questions of whether federal prosecutors may viably use RICO to prosecute spoofing and whether do- ing so will produce significant implications.