Robert Royston Oral History Transcipt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Robert Royston Oral History Transcipt The Cultural Landscape Foundation® Pioneers of American Landscape Design® ___________________________________ ROBERT ROYSTON ORAL HISTORY INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT ___________________________________ Interviews Conducted August 2007 By Charles A. Birnbaum, FASLA, FAAR, with J.C. Miller The Cultural Landscape Foundation® Pioneers of American Landscape Design® Oral History Series: Robert Royston Interview Transcript Contents PRELUDE .......................................................................................................................................... 5 BIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................................... 5 CHILDHOOD ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 A California Walnut Orchard .................................................................................................................................. 5 Building a Model Town .......................................................................................................................................... 7 From Swimming Holes to High School ................................................................................................................... 8 EDUCATION................................................................................................................................................................ 8 From High School to the University of California, Berkeley................................................................................... 8 Looking at Art in San Francisco as a Student ......................................................................................................... 9 The Inspirational Professor Vaughan ................................................................................................................... 10 Early Impressions of Tommy Church and Garrett Eckbo ..................................................................................... 11 Becoming a Landscape Architect ......................................................................................................................... 12 Discovering Tommy Church ................................................................................................................................. 13 EARLY PRACTICE....................................................................................................................................................... 14 Working for Tommy Church ................................................................................................................................ 14 The Eagle Pencil ............................................................................................................................................... 15 Tommy Church, the Dancer ............................................................................................................................. 16 Living with Tommy Church .............................................................................................................................. 16 Tommy Church and Pruning ............................................................................................................................ 17 WORLD WAR II ..................................................................................................................................................... 17 Enlisting for Service ............................................................................................................................................. 17 Building Models in the Navy ................................................................................................................................ 19 POSTWAR PRACTICE AND TEACHING ...................................................................................................................... 19 The Formation of Eckbo, Royston & Williams ..................................................................................................... 19 The Decision to Leave Tommy Church................................................................................................................. 20 Teaching at Berkeley ............................................................................................................................................ 21 Hiring Students from the University .................................................................................................................... 22 New Towns and Teaching .................................................................................................................................... 23 The Loyalty Oath and Going East to Teach .......................................................................................................... 23 DESIGN .......................................................................................................................................... 24 The Model Box and Tension .................................................................................................................................... 25 Telesis ...................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Listening to and Learning from People .................................................................................................................... 27 The Human Being As the Module of Activity ........................................................................................................... 28 The Design of Golden Gate Park .............................................................................................................................. 28 Designing Street Furniture ....................................................................................................................................... 29 © 2020 The Cultural Landscape Foundation, all rights reserved. May not be used or reproduced without permission. 2 The Cultural Landscape Foundation® Pioneers of American Landscape Design® Oral History Series: Robert Royston Interview Transcript Understanding Space ............................................................................................................................................... 30 Elements of the Landscape That Should Be Preserved ............................................................................................ 31 The Long View.......................................................................................................................................................... 32 Learning from People and Connecting to Age Groups ............................................................................................ 32 Plan View Versus Aerial View .................................................................................................................................. 33 The Expanding Landscape ........................................................................................................................................ 34 Design Intent and the Element of Time ................................................................................................................... 34 Landscape As the Primary Determinant .................................................................................................................. 35 A Total Composition ................................................................................................................................................ 36 Parks and the Human Response to Smaller Spaces ................................................................................................. 37 The Garden Starts in the House ............................................................................................................................... 38 PROJECTS ...................................................................................................................................... 38 PARKMERCED .......................................................................................................................................................... 38 POTRERO HILL .......................................................................................................................................................... 39 VALENCIA GARDENS AND NORTH BEACH................................................................................................................ 39 VALLEJO HOUSING ................................................................................................................................................... 40 THE HART GARDEN .................................................................................................................................................. 42 THE CHINN GARDEN ................................................................................................................................................ 43 THE ROYSTON RESIDENCE ....................................................................................................................................... 44 Panels by Florence Swift ...................................................................................................................................... 44 Screens................................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Read This Issue
    VIEW 2019 VIEW from the Director’s Office Dear Friends of LALH, This year’s VIEW reflects our recent sharpening focus on California, from the Bay Area to San Diego. We open with an article by JC Miller about Robert Royston’s final project, the Harris garden in Palm Springs, which he worked on personally and continues to develop with the owners. A forthcoming LALH book on Royston by Miller and Reuben M. Rainey, the fourth volume in our Masters of Modern Landscape Design series, will be released early next year at Modernism Week in Palm Springs. Both article and book feature new photographs by the stellar landscape photographer Millicent Harvey. Next up, Kenneth I. Helphand explores Lawrence Halprin’s extraordinary drawings and their role in his de- sign process. “I find that I think most effectively graphically,” Halprin explained, and Helphand’s look at Halprin’s prolific notebook sketches and drawings vividly illuminates the creative symbiosis that led to the built works. The California theme continues with an introduction to Paul Thiene, the German-born landscape architect who super- vised the landscape development of the 1915 Panama-California Exposition in San Diego and went on to establish a thriving practice in the Southland. Next, the renowned architect Marc Appleton writes about his own Santa Barbara garden, Villa Corbeau, inspired—as were so many of Thiene’s designs—by Italy. The influence of Italy was also major in the career of Lockwood de Forest Jr. Here, Ann de Forest remembers her grandparents and their Santa Barbara home as the family archives, recently donated by LALH, are moved to the Architecture & Design Collections at UC Santa Barbara.
    [Show full text]
  • Classy City: Residential Realms of the Bay Region
    Classy City: Residential Realms of the Bay Region Richard Walker Department of Geography University of California Berkeley 94720 USA On-line version Revised 2002 Previous published version: Landscape and city life: four ecologies of residence in the San Francisco Bay Area. Ecumene . 2(1), 1995, pp. 33-64. (Includes photos & maps) ANYONE MAY DOWNLOAD AND USE THIS PAPER WITH THE USUAL COURTESY OF CITATION. COPYRIGHT 2004. The residential areas occupy the largest swath of the built-up portion of cities, and therefore catch the eye of the beholder above all else. Houses, houses, everywhere. Big houses, little houses, apartment houses; sterile new tract houses, picturesque Victorian houses, snug little stucco homes; gargantuan manor houses, houses tucked into leafy hillsides, and clusters of town houses. Such residential zones establish the basic tone of urban life in the metropolis. By looking at residential landscapes around the city, one can begin to capture the character of the place and its people. We can mark out five residential landscapes in the Bay Area. The oldest is the 19th century Victorian townhouse realm. The most extensive is the vast domain of single-family homes in the suburbia of the 20th century. The grandest is the carefully hidden ostentation of the rich in their estates and manor houses. The most telling for the cultural tone of the region is a middle class suburbia of a peculiar sort: the ecotopian middle landscape. The most vital, yet neglected, realms are the hotel and apartment districts, where life spills out on the streets. More than just an assemblage of buildings and styles, the character of these urban realms reflects the occupants and their class origins, the economics and organization of home- building, and larger social purposes and planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 2016-10-14
    Focused Environmental Impact Report SCREENCHECK DRAFT #2 Ursa Residential Development Project Appendix C Technical Memorandum – Summary Historical Resources Report Prepared for: City of Fremont AECOM September 2017 C-1 Focused Environmental Impact Report SCREENCHECK DRAFT #2 Ursa Residential Development Project This page intentionally left blank. Prepared for: City of Fremont AECOM September 2017 C-2 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AECOM 2020 L Street, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95811 Date: July 3, 2017; revised September 18, 2017 To: Bill Roth, Associate Planner, City of Fremont From: Jeremy Hollins, MA, Senior Architectural Historian, AECOM Chandra Miller, MA, Architectural Historian, AECOM Subject: Ursa Residential Development Project – Summary Historical Resources Report Introduction AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM) has been retained by the City of Fremont to complete an Initial Study and Focused EIR for the Ursa Residential Development Project (project). The project, located at 48495 Ursa Drive, is a Precise Planned Development that will construct 17 new residences and relocate one existing on-site residence on a property that has been previously determined a historical resource for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Impacts to historical resources will be examined in the Focused EIR that addresses the relocation of the historical residence and the construction of the new residences. This memorandum provides additional historic context and more detailed evaluation of the property to support the findings of the Focused EIR. Proposed Project As part of the proposed Ursa Residential project, the applicant proposes rezoning a 2.67-acre site from R‐1‐6 to a Planned District; the relocation of the existing historic-period residence and ancillary tankhouse; demolition of other existing structures (barn, garage, and various sheds) on-site; and construction of 17 new single family houses.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Report for the University of California, Santa
    Appendix E Cultural Resources Information Appendix E1 – Archaeological Resources Report Bay Area Division Phone: 510.524.3991 900 Modoc Street Fax: 510.524.4419 Berkeley, CA 94707 www.pacificlegacy.com Date: July 3, 2020 To: Claudia Garcia, Ascent Environmental. From: John Holson Subject: Technical Memo For Cultural Resource Studies, UC Santa Cruz, Long Range Development Plan. Pacific Legacy has prepared this memo to assist Ascent Environmental in preparing the Cultural Resources Section of the UC Santa Cruz, Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) Environmental Impact Report. Below are our findings and sections for the LRDP. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Regional Prehistory The earliest confirmed evidence of prehistoric occupation in the Santa Cruz region comes from an archaeological site (CA-SCR-177) located 4 miles northeast of the campus in the Santa Cruz Mountains near Scotts Valley. Cartier (1993) postulated that CA-SCR-177 may date to approximately 10,000 years before present (BP). This is supported by the California Central Coast Chronology (Jones et al. 2007), which posits prehistoric life in the region extending to 10,000 years BP or earlier. While few sites have been identified from the Paleoindian through the Early Archaic (8000 to 5000 BP) periods in the Santa Cruz area, numerous sites have been dated to the Middle Archaic (5000 BP to 3000 BP) and Late Archaic (3000 BP to 1000 AD) periods. The Late Prehistoric Period (1000 to about 1600 AD) has been identified from at least one site near Santa Cruz (Fitzgerald and Ruby 1997; Hylkema 1991). Archaeological evidence indicates that Native groups in the region participated in extensive trade networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Maverick Impossible-James Rose and the Modern American Garden
    Maverick Impossible-James Rose and the Modern American Garden. Dean Cardasis, Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture, University of Massachusetts (Amherst) “To see the universe within a place is to see a garden; approach to American garden design. to see it so is to have a garden; Rose was a rugged individualist who explored the not to prevent its happening is to build a garden.” universal through the personal. Both his incisive James Rose, Modern American Gardens. writings and his exquisite gardens evidence the vitality of an approach to garden making (and life) as James Rose was one of the leaders of the modern an adventure within the great cosmic joke. He movement in American garden design. I write this disapproved of preconceiving design or employing advisedly because James “ the-maverick-impossible” any formulaic method, and favored direct Rose would be the first to disclaim it. “I’m no spontaneous improvisation with nature. Unlike fellow missionary,” he often exclaimed, “I do what pleases modern rebels and friends, Dan Kiley and Garrett me!”1 Nevertheless, Rose, through his experimental Eckbo, Rose devoted his life to exploring the private built works, his imaginative creative writing, and his garden as a place of self-discovery. Because of the generally subversive life-style provides perhaps the contemplative nature of his gardens, his work has clearest image of what may be termed a truly modern sometimes been mislabeled Japanesebut nothing made Rose madder than to suggest he did Japanese gardens. In fact, in response to a query from one prospective client as to whether he could do a Japanese garden for her, Rose replied, “Of course, whereabouts in Japan do you live?”2 This kind of response to what he would call his clients’ “mind fixes” was characteristic of James Rose.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Place for Art
    JC Miller MAKING A PLACE FOR ART: COLLABORATION BETWEEN EDITH HEATH AND ROBERT ROYSTON Edith Heath seated near the garden room, Heath Collection, EDA, UCB. 215 The years following World War II saw extraordinary growth in California. Philosophies Heath: Edith So began a collaboration that generated a remarkable garden that The home front effort brought industrial production to California coastal cities reflected both Royston’s modernist design principles and Heath’s creative on an unprecedented scale. This was especially true in the San Francisco Bay talents. Beyond the Heath’s garden, the pair collaborated on tile art in the Area. Thousands moved to the Golden State to work in wartime industries landscape and on furniture design. Perhaps as a result of their friendship and and returning veterans further swelled the numbers as they chose to stay after shared approach to design, Royston specified tile made by Heath for all the discharge from military service at the ports of Oakland and San Francisco.1 gardens he designed throughout his long career.3 This postwar boom was nourished by an increase in high-paying jobs in the commercial, manufacturing, and professional sectors, a home-building boom Robert Royston, Landscape Architect fueled by mortgages secured by the Federal Housing Administration and educational opportunities funded by the G.I. Bill of Rights. In Robert Royston, Heath found a kindred creative spirit whose work as a Many of the state’s new residents were creatives: architects, designers, landscape architect was becoming well known in California and nationally. artists, and performers drawn by the region’s vitality.
    [Show full text]
  • Pieris, A. Sociospatial Genealogies of Wartime Impoverishment
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND VOL. 33 Edited by AnnMarie Brennan and Philip Goad Published in Melbourne, Australia, by SAHANZ, 2016 ISBN: 978-0-7340-5265-0 The bibliographic citation for this paper is: Anoma Pieris “Sociospatial Genealogies of Wartime Impoverishment: Temporary Farm Labour Camps in the U.S.A.” In Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand: 33, Gold, edited by AnnMarie Brennan and Philip Goad, 558-567. Melbourne: SAHANZ, 2016. All efforts have been undertaken to ensure that authors have secured appropriate permissions to reproduce the images illustrating individual contributions. Interested parties may contact the editors. Anoma Pieris University of Melbourne SOCIOSPATIAL GENEALOGIES OF WARTIME IMPOVERISHMENT: TEMPORARY FARM LABOUR CAMPS IN THE U.S.A. Established to develop New Deal resettlement programs in 1937, the United States Farm Security Administration (F.S.A.) was best known for accommodating migratory labour from the drought-stricken central plains. Large numbers arriving in California prompted F.S.A. engineers and architects to develop purpose-designed labour camps and townships, described as early exemplars of community planning. Yet in 1942, when 118,803 Japanese and Japanese Americans were evacuated from the newly created Military Exclusion Zones and incarcerated in relocation centres, F.S.A. skills were put to a different use. This paper demonstrates how wartime exigency, racist immigration policies and militarisation transformed a model for relief and rehabilitation into a carceral equivalent. It contextualises this transformation within a socio-spatial genealogy of temporary facilities that accommodated mass human displacements – including two examples from California: the Tulare County F.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Iconic Architecture Via the St. Petersburg Pier
    The Endless Pier: A Study of Iconic Architecture via the St. Petersburg Pier by Kyle W. Pierson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Liberal Arts Department of Humanities College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida, St. Petersburg Major Professor: Thomas Hallock, Ph.D. Raymond Arsenault, Ph.D. Carol Mickett, Ph.D. Louis Simon, Ph.D. Date of Approval: July 11, 2014 Keywords: Florida Architecture, Iconicity, William B. Harvard, Sr., Inverted Pyramid, Architects, Palimpsest, Bauhaus, Modernism, Postmodernism Copyright © 2014, Kyle W. Pierson Dedication For Dave, who will always have my endless love. Acknowledgments Writing a thesis requires support from an intellectual community, friends, and family. I want to acknowledge them here. First, I am grateful to Dr. Ray Arsenault and Dr. Gary Mormino, who welcomed me into the Florida Studies Program. Thanks to this program, I now see every issue through the lens of a Florida Studies student — a useful backdrop for understanding American history. This project began with a paper I wrote for Dr. Louis Simon’s post modernism class. His course stimulated me to ask how architecture reflected cultural values. Dr. Thomas Hallock, my major professor, guided me toward deeper research and showed me how to apply theoretical ideas to my thesis. I am grateful to Dr. Hallock for his unwavering encouragement, his insightful questions, and his insistence on using primary sources, but most of all for expanding my mind. For their careful reading, friendship, and commitment to my project, I am deeply indebted to Thomas L. Brown and Rita Herron Brown -— thank you! My supporters also included my daughters, Katherine and Hilary; my friends, Deborah O’Hearn and Christine Melecci, each of whom encouraged me to reach this goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloadfile/616075 Toft, J
    REVIEW published: 30 April 2021 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.582041 Designing (for) Urban Food Webs Alexander J. Felson 1,2,3 and Aaron M. Ellison 4* 1 Melbourne School of Design, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2 Connecticut Institute for Resilience and Climate Adaptation, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT, United States, 3 Urban Ecology and Design Lab and Ecopolitan Design, New Haven, CT, United States, 4 Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, MA, United States Interest is growing in designing resilient and ecologically rich urban environments that provide social and ecological benefits. Regenerative and biocentric designs fostering urban ecological habitats including food webs that provide ecosystem services for people and wildlife increasingly are being sought. However, the intentional design of urban landscapes for food webs remains in an early stage with few precedents and many challenges. In this paper, we explore the potential to design (for) urban food webs through collaborations between designers and ecologists. We start by examining the ecology and management of Jamaica Bay in New York City as a case study of an anthropogenic landscape where ecosystems are degraded and the integrity of extant food webs are intertwined with human agency. A subsequent design competition focusing on ecological design and management of this large-scale landscape for animal habitat and ecosystem Edited by: services for people illustrates how designers approach this anthropogenic landscape. Mary L. Cadenasso, This case study reveals that both designing urban landscapes for food webs and directly University of California, Davis, United States designing and manipulating urban food webs are complicated and challenging to achieve Reviewed by: and maintain, but they have the potential to increase ecological health of, and enhance Frederick R.
    [Show full text]
  • NEA Chronology Final
    THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS 1965 2000 A BRIEF CHRONOLOGY OF FEDERAL SUPPORT FOR THE ARTS President Johnson signs the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act, establishing the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities, on September 29, 1965. Foreword he National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act The thirty-five year public investment in the arts has paid tremen­ Twas passed by Congress and signed into law by President dous dividends. Since 1965, the Endowment has awarded more Johnson in 1965. It states, “While no government can call a great than 111,000 grants to arts organizations and artists in all 50 states artist or scholar into existence, it is necessary and appropriate for and the six U.S. jurisdictions. The number of state and jurisdic­ the Federal Government to help create and sustain not only a tional arts agencies has grown from 5 to 56. Local arts agencies climate encouraging freedom of thought, imagination, and now number over 4,000 – up from 400. Nonprofit theaters have inquiry, but also the material conditions facilitating the release of grown from 56 to 340, symphony orchestras have nearly doubled this creative talent.” On September 29 of that year, the National in number from 980 to 1,800, opera companies have multiplied Endowment for the Arts – a new public agency dedicated to from 27 to 113, and now there are 18 times as many dance com­ strengthening the artistic life of this country – was created. panies as there were in 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas D. Church Collection, 1933-1977
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf938nb4jf Online items available Thomas D. Church Collection, 1933-1977 Processed by the Environmental Design Archives staff Environmental Design Archives College of Environmental Design 230 Wurster Hall #1820 University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-1820 Phone: (510) 642-5124 Fax: (510) 642-2824 Email: [email protected] http://www.ced.berkeley.edu/cedarchives/ © 1999 The Regents of California. All rights reserved. Note Arts and Humanities--ArchitectureHistory--California History--Bay Area HistoryHistory--California HistoryGeographical (By Place)--CaliforniaGeographical (By Place)--California--Bay AreaGeographical (By Place)--University of California--UC BerkeleyGeographical (By Place)--University of California--UC Santa CruzHistory--University of California History--UC Berkeley HistoryHistory--University of California History--UC Santa Cruz History Thomas D. Church Collection, 1997-1 1 1933-1977 Thomas D. Church Collection, 1933-1977 Collection Number: 1997-1 Environmental Design Archives University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: Environmental Design Archives College of Environmental Design 230 Wurster Hall #1820 University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-1820 Phone: (510) 642-5124 Fax: (510) 642-2824 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.ced.berkeley.edu/cedarchives/ Processed by: Environmental Design Archives staff Date Completed: January 1999 Encoded by: Campbell J. Crabtree Funding: Arrangement and description of this collection was funded by the Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning and by a grant from the Getty Foundation. © 1999 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Collection Title: Thomas D. Church Collection, Date (inclusive): 1933-1977 Collection Number: 1997-1 Creator: Church, Thomas Dolliver, 1902-1978 Extent: 114 boxes, 9 flat boxes, 29 tubes, 8 flat file drawers Repository: Environmental Design Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Design with Nature Now Contribution Cover Page
    DESIGN WITH NATURE NOW CONTRIBUTION COVER PAGE Title: Ian Lennox McHarg, Scotland and the Emergence of Green Consciousness Author: Brian Mark Evans Professor of Urbanism and Landscape Mackintosh School of Architecture The Glasgow School of Art ABSTRACT This essay seeks to place Ian Lennox McHarg and Design With Nature in contemporary and Scottish contexts. It reflects on the green consciousness of Scottish traditions and sets McHarg alongside his fellow internationally renowned and environmentally conscious Scots: John Muir and Patrick Geddes. It is suggested that the migration of dispossessed highlanders to Glasgow brought this culture to the city and this has, in turn, informed the emergence of bio-regionalism and green consciousness in Scotland. McHarg’s contribution to the early days of this movement is noted as is the significance of his work in informing the school of landscape thought (in the UK and Scotland in particular) that is rooted in regionalism, terrain, ecology and nature. Finally the text refers to the work in Scotland of graduates from McHarg’s landscape programs at the University of Pennsylvania and concludes that they in turn refreshed the Design With Nature methodology and re-invigorated subsequent generations of landscape planners and landscape architects in Scotland. Mailing Address: 7 Seyton Court, Seyton Avenue Giffnock Glasgow G46 6QA Scotland UK Telephone: T: +44 (0) 141 620 1518 M: +44 (0) 7801 495155 Email: [email protected] 1 POSSIBLE FIGURES Figure 8.1: Photograph of Jacobs, McHarg, Lynch et al Figure 8.2: John Muir, Patrick Geddes and Ian McHarg Figure 8.3: The Clyde Valley Regional Plan 1946 Figure 8.4: The Central Scotland Green Network Figure 8.5: The landscape plan for the expansion of Moscow 2 8.
    [Show full text]