DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Kookaburra Gully Mining Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Kookaburra Gully Mining Lease Application Request for Response Document Letter Attachment 03 24 Public Submissions (excluding confidential public submissions) Kookaburra Gully Mining Lease Application - Public Submissions (excluding confidential submissions) Page 1 of 263 Contents Page Submission Number Public Submission Name Page Number 1 MD & SR Sheehan 3 2 Carole Wetherby 6 3 District Council of Tumby Bay 7 4 Name and Address Withheld 10 5 Name and Address Withheld 16 6 Name and Address Withheld 19 7 Name and Address Withheld 21 8 Name and Address Withheld 26 9 Caryll Cabot 30 10 Anne Daw 35 11 John & Janet Moore 46 12 Name and Address Withheld 48 13 Name and Address Withheld 53 14 Name and Address Withheld 58 15 Name and Address Withheld 60 16 Name and Address Withheld 62 17 Name and Address Withheld 67 18 Name and Address Withheld 72 19 Name and Address Withheld 77 20 Name and Address Withheld 84 21 Name and Address Withheld 90 Tumby Bay Residents and Ratepayers 22 Association Inc. 91 23 Stop Invasive Mining Group 249 24 Emie Borthwick 257 Kookaburra Gully Mining Lease Application - Public Submissions (excluding confidential submissions) Page 2 of 263 MD&SR Sheehan Box156 Cummins 5631 26th October 2015 For Attention: Business Support Officer Mining Regulation Branch Department of State Development GPO Box 320 Adelaide 5001 Dear Sir/Madam We are writing this letter as concerned primary producers who live on Lower Eyre Peninsula. We are extremely concerned about the potential for damage to be caused to the groundwater on Lower EP. If this is in any way contaminated or damaged the effect would be disastrous for all people living on Eyre Peninsula. See: GROUNDWATER (Vol 1 Section7.4) We also have grave concerns about the DUST (Vol1 Section4pp 106.7 Section 7.4) and the effect it will have on the surrounding district. We also note that the TRANSPORT ROUTE (Vol1 Section 7.9) raises serious issues for the area. We trust that these concerns will be taken seriously and acted upon as we are just two of a large number of people seriously concerned about many issues in regard to this project. Yours faithfully Mark and Sharon Sheehan Transport Route (Volume 1: Section 7.9) (a) It is noted that the transport route has been determined in the absence of consultation with the community and Elected Members of the District Council of Tumby Bay (as evidenced by discussions at the Council meeting of 13 October 2015). (b) There is no agreement with the DCTB as to the actual transport route (c) Assumptions have been made on the part of the Works Manager as to the transport route, but these are not transparent to Elected Members not the Community at large Kookaburra Gully Mining Lease Application - Public Submissions (excluding confidential submissions) Page 3 of 263 (d) The capability of the ‘determined route’ appears not to have been subjected to any formal approval process through DPTI (e) The impact upon native vegetation and EPBC listed species is not recognised in the Application (f) The application includes cost estimates from a private contractor as to upgrading the road, but no Council budget exists for this work to be undertaken and no agreement to cost sharing exists. (g) There is no economic benefit statement to the community pertaining to the proposed road upgrade, only the potential for continued maintenance and repair liabilities for the life of the mine and beyond. Dust (Volume 1:Section 4,pp106‐7: Section 7.4) An analysis of the data provided indicates the existence of a significant number of minerals within the ore body that are potentially harmful to human health and plant health. These include not only the graphite, but Chromium, Manganese, Nickel, Rare Earths, Strontium, Thorium and Uranium together with Copper, Magnesium and Zinc. These minerals are potential carcinogens and or neurotoxins in humans and growth inhibitors in plants. The nature and health impacts together with potential agricultural industry impacts of the dust emanating from mining operations are inadequately described in the application. In the absence of on‐site meteorological data, the dispersion pattern modelled from data remote from the site is of concern, given the potential nature of the contaminant within the dust and their impact upon humans and plants alike. There is no consideration given to the impact upon pastures and thence animals whom ingest these contaminants over a period of time. The application is devoid of information pertaining to the economic losses attributed to the impact of copper, magnesium and zinc (in excess of trace levels) on grain production. The application is devoid of information pertaining to the impact upon agricultural businesses within the fallout cloud of contaminated dust through contaminated grain deliveries. The application is devoid of information pertaining to the potential contamination of rain water, the main source of drinking water for the area. The application is devoid of any impact of the contaminated dust reaching the township of Tumby Bay having regard to the topography (height above sea level of the proposed mine) and the wind direction (and velocity) towards Tumby Bay. The application is devoid of information pertaining to the impact on surface water contained within the Tod River Water Protection Zone (as per the DCTB Development Plan) or the Tod River Wetland of National Significance. Groundwater (Volume 1: Section 7.4) Kookaburra Gully Mining Lease Application - Public Submissions (excluding confidential submissions) Page 4 of 263 An analysis of the data provided indicates the existence of a significant number of minerals within the ore body that are potentially harmful to human health and plant health. These include not only the graphite, but Chromium, Copper, Manganese, Nickel, Rare Earths, Strontium, Thorium and Uranium. These minerals are potential carcinogens and or neurotoxins in humans and growth inhibitors in plants. The nature of the hazardous materials emanating from mining operations inclusive of the processing operations is inadequately described in the application. The environmental impact associated with contamination of groundwater with the hazardous materials identified is not fully disclosed neither is the long term health impacts associated with contaminated ground water. It is noted that there are significant limitations with respect to the geotechnical, hydrogeology and hydrology of the site, especially in regard to the design of the TSF facility (Section 4.7.7.4 pp 198). It is significant concern that the limitations highlighted by the consultant extends beyond the TSF facility to include the known fact that no data exists for MC4372, nor does the geo‐hydrology or hydrology exists beyond the boundaries of MC4373 which may impact upon the Prescribed Wells Area to the South, the source of potable water for the lower Eyre Peninsula. Kookaburra Gully Mining Lease Application - Public Submissions (excluding confidential submissions) Page 5 of 263 Business Support Officer, Mining Regulation Branch, Dept of State Development, GPO Box 320, Adelaide SA 5001 October 23, 2015 The Australian Graphite Limited, Kookaburra Gully Graphite Mine, Mineral Lease Application will need a magical Editor to fix all the inaccuracies and deficiencies that are in this report. A committee of 5 have reviewed the entire report and I attended the meeting to observe the inconsistencies and inaccuracies that are all through the report. Following are listed a few – Transport Route (Volume 1: Section 7.9) 1. In various sections of this part of the report, the number of heavy vehicles using the road differs in a number of paragraphs. 2. There is no agreement with the District Council of Tumby Bay as to the actual transport route. Dust (Volume 1:Section 4, pp106-7: Section 7.4) 1. This report has nothing mentioned to the major impact upon agricultural businesses within the fallout cloud of contaminated dust due to constant very windy conditions that will contaminate Eyre Peninsula’s huge grain deliveries. (The mining company have said there is nothing to worry about, we breathe in graphite dust particles all the time!! What an outrageous statement to make!!) 2. One of the most outstanding missing section in the report is the potential contamination of rain water which happens to be the Eyre Peninsula’s main source of drinking water. Groundwater (Volume 1: Section 7.4) 1. The nature of the hazardous materials emanating from mining operations inclusive of the processing operations is inadequately described in the application. 2. The environmental impact associated with contamination of groundwater with the hazardous materials identified is not fully disclosed neither is the long term health impacts associated with contaminated ground water. 3. (Section 4.7.7.4 pp 198) There are significant limitations with respect to the geotechnical, hydrogeology and hydrology of the site, especially in regard to the design of the TSF facility. It is significant concern that the limitations highlighted by the consultant extends beyond the TSF facility to include the known fact that no data exists for MC4372, nor does the geo-hydrology or hydrology review exist beyond the boundaries of MC4373 which may impact upon the Prescribed Wells Area to the South, the source of potable water for the Lower Eyre Peninsula. (In view of this part of the document, the whole project needs to stop). Community members have been informed there would be limited blasting. However, the lease application document states there will be a huge amount of explosives and dangerous toxic chemicals stored on site. This is a direct conflict to what the mining company had originally informed the community. The report on the Kookaburra Graphite Mine has obviously been very carelessly put together. The report, as is, lacks a knowledgeable, educated approach and definitely a non-convincing reason to rip or blow up completely good viable farm land.
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Assessment of a Strategic Port Expansion Option – Port Prepared For: Port Pirie Regional Council Pirie Regional Council Revision: FINAL 20 December 2013

    Preliminary Assessment of a Strategic Port Expansion Option – Port Prepared For: Port Pirie Regional Council Pirie Regional Council Revision: FINAL 20 December 2013

    Reference: 239048 Project: Preliminary Assessment of a Strategic Port Expansion Option – Port Prepared for: Port Pirie Regional Council Pirie Regional Council Revision: FINAL 20 December 2013 Document Control Record Document prepared by: Aurecon Australia Pty Ltd ABN 54 005 139 873 55 Grenfell Street Adelaide SA 5000 Australia T +61 8 8237 9777 F +61 8 8237 9778 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Preliminary Assessment of a Strategic Port Expansion Option – Port Pirie Regional Council Date | 20 December 2013 Reference | 239048 Revision | FINAL Aurecon Australia Pty Ltd ABN 54 005 139 873 55 Grenfell Street Adelaide SA 5000 Australia T +61 8 8237 9777 F +61 8 8237 9778 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com Contents 1 Overview of this Preliminary Assessment 4 1.1 Purpose & Key Topics Covered in this Preliminary Assessment 4 1.2 Key Findings 5 1.3 Limitations of this Preliminary Assessment 6 1.4 Contacts for Interested Parties 6 2 Port Pirie – A Strategic Service Hub for the Minerals & Resources Sector 7 2.1 Growing Exploration Activity in South Australia 7 2.2 Introduction to Port Pirie 8 2.3 Access to Prime Infrastructure 10 2.4 Development Role of Port Pirie Council and Regional Development Australia Yorke & Mid North 11 2.5 Background
  • Adelaide Botanic Gardens

    Adelaide Botanic Gardens

    JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia © 2008 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 22 (2008) 5–8 © 2008 Department for Environment & Heritage, Government of South Australia Prasophyllum laxum (Orchidaceae), a new leek-orchid species from southern Eyre Peninsula, South Australia Robert J. Bates C/- State Herbarium of South Australia, Plant Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Prasophyllum laxum R.J.Bates, a rare local endemic leek orchid from southern Eyre Peninsula, South Australia, is described as new and illustrations and a key to related South Australian species are provided. Introduction Prasophyllum laxum has been compared with P. A single collection at the State Herbarium of lindleyanum Rchb.f. (as P. aff. lindleyanum; Bates South Australia (AD) of an apparently undescribed 2006), mainly because of the sigmoid labellum, but that Prasophyllum from southern Eyre Peninsula, hundred of species is restricted to Tasmania and (mostly eastern) Koppio, section 212 (M.G.Clark 212) had long intrigued Victoria and has rigidly erect spikes with usually green the author but despite many searches on Southern Eyre and white, very neat flowers with the short labellum Peninsula from 1982 to 2002 no further plants were having strongly incurved margins, and the callus shortly located.
  • Understanding and Improving Processes for Integrated Urban Water Management Strategies in Australia

    Understanding and Improving Processes for Integrated Urban Water Management Strategies in Australia

    Understanding and improving processes for Integrated Urban Water Management strategies in Australia A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lachlan Thomas Hutton Guthrie Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) (Honours) RMIT University School of Engineering College of Science, Engineering and Health RMIT University July 2018 Declaration I certify that except where due acknowledgement has been made, the work is that of the author alone; the work has not been submitted previously, in whole or in part, to qualify for any other academic award; the content of the project is the result of work which has been carried out since the official commencement date of the approved research program; any editorial work, paid or unpaid, carried out by a third party is acknowledged; and, ethics procedures and guidelines have been followed. I acknowledge the support I have received for my research through the provision of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. Signed: Lachlan Guthrie Date: 17/07/2018 Lachlan Guthrie – PhD Thesis III Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank God and acknowledge that were it not for His grace I would not be where I am today. This thesis was very much dependent on the generous assistance that I have received from others. Foremost, my friend and colleague Casey Furlong, another PhD candidate at RMIT who has finished. Casey and I worked closely together in the early stages of the research, refining the objectives of both our research projects. As can be seen, Casey and I have authored many publications together and without his support this thesis would not be where it is today.
  • E-F-82-TEM-0026 1 (Report Template 2010)

    E-F-82-TEM-0026 1 (Report Template 2010)

    Central Eyre Iron Project Environmental Impact Statement CHAPTER 22: SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT CHAPTER 22 SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT COPYRIGHT Copyright © Iron Road Limited, 2015 All rights reserved This document and any related documentation is protected by copyright owned by Iron Road Limited. The content of this document and any related documentation may only be copied and distributed for the purposes of section 46B of the Development Act, 1993 (SA) and otherwise with the prior written consent of Iron Road Limited. DISCLAIMER Iron Road Limited has taken all reasonable steps to review the information contained in this document and to ensure its accuracy as at the date of submission. Note that: (a) in writing this document, Iron Road Limited has relied on information provided by specialist consultants, government agencies, and other third parties. Iron Road Limited has reviewed all information to the best of its ability but does not take responsibility for the accuracy or completeness; and (b) this document has been prepared for information purposes only and, to the full extent permitted by law, Iron Road Limited, in respect of all persons other than the relevant government departments, makes no representation and gives no warranty or undertaking, express or implied, in respect to the information contained herein, and does not accept responsibility and is not liable for any loss or liability whatsoever arising as a result of any person acting or refraining from acting on any information contained within it. 22 Social Environment .............................................. 22-1 22.1 Applicable Legislation and Standards .................................................................................... 22-1 22.2 Impact Assessment Method .................................................................................................. 22-2 22.2.1 Study Areas ............................................................................................................
  • Southern Eyre Subregional Description

    Southern Eyre Subregional Description

    Southern Eyre Subregional Description Landscape Plan for Eyre Peninsula - Appendix C Southern Eyre comprises a land area of around 6,500 square kilometres, along with a large marine area. The southern boundary extends east from Spencer Gulf to the Southern Ocean, while the northern boundary extends along the agricultural plains north of Cummins. QUICK STATS Population: Approximately 23,500 Major towns (population): Port Lincoln (16,000), Tumby Bay (1,474), Cummins (719), Coffin Bay (615) Traditional Owners: Barngarla and Nauo nations Local Governments: Port Lincoln City Council, District Council of Lower Eyre Peninsula and District Council of Tumby Bay Land Area: Approximately 6,500 square kilometres Main land uses (% of land area): Cropping and grazing (63%), conservation (34%) Main industries: Fishing, aquaculture, agriculture, retail trade, health and community services, tourism, construction, mining Annual Rainfall: 340 – 560mm Highest elevation: Marble Range (436 metres AHD) Coastline length: 710 kilometres (excludes islands) Number of Islands: 113 2 Southern Eyre Subregional Description Southern Eyre What’s valued in Southern Eyre enjoy camping, 4WD adventures and walking. The pristine environment at Memory Cove and Coffin The Southern Eyre community is intrinsically linked Bay’s remoteness and wildness, provide a sense of to the natural environment with its identity ingrained adventure and place. in the “great outdoors”. Many people have their own favourite spot where they go to unwind and feel a Sir Joseph Banks Group are magic sense of place. For some it is their own patch, for parts of the world. They have an others it is a secluded beach or an adventure in the abundance of marine and birdlife bush.
  • Port Spencer Grain Export Facility Peninsula Ports

    Port Spencer Grain Export Facility Peninsula Ports

    Port Spencer Grain Export Facility Peninsula Ports Amendment to Public Environmental Report IW219900-0-NP-RPT-0003 | 2 8 November 2019 Amend ment to Pu blic Envir onm ental Rep ort Peninsula P orts Amendment to Public Environmental Report Port Spencer Grain Export Facility Project No: IW219900 Document Title: Amendment to Public Environmental Report Document No.: IW219900-0-NP-RPT-0003 Revision: 2 Date: 8 November 2019 Client Name: Peninsula Ports Client No: Client Reference Project Manager: Scott Snedden Author: Alana Horan File Name: J:\IE\Projects\06_Central West\IW219900\21 Deliverables\AMENDMENT TO THE PER\Amendment to PER_Rev 2.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Level 3, 121 King William Street Adelaide SA 5000 Australia www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2020 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved H 31.10.2019 Draft AH NB SS 0 1.11.2019 Draft issued to DPTI AH SS DM 1 8.11.2019 Issued to DPTI AH SS DM 2 13.1.2020 Re-issued Volume 1 to DPTI.
  • Uley South – Coffin Bay Observation Well Network Review

    Uley South – Coffin Bay Observation Well Network Review

    Uley South – Coffin Bay Observation Well Network Review Deborah S Clarke, Volmer Berens and Kevin J Dennis Resource Assessment Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation January 2003 Report DWLBC 2003/4 Government of South Australia Resource Assessment Division Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 25 Grenfell Street, Adelaide GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001 Telephone National (08) (08) 8463 6946 International +61 8 8463 6946 Fax National (08) 8463 6999 International +61 8 8463 6999 Website www.dwlbc.sa.gov.au Disclaimer Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of the use, of the information contained herein as regards to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation and its employees expressly disclaims all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. © Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation 2003 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cwlth), no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Director, Resource Assessment Division, Department of Water, Land and Biodiversity Conservation, GPO Box 2834, Adelaide SA 5001. Acknowledgements Thanks are forwarded to John Dinninson, David Cunningham, Peter Russ, Mark Sindicic, Natasha Hall, Jason Van Der Akker, for their assistance in the field. Clarke, D.S., Berens, V., and Dennis, K.J., 2003. Uley South – Coffin Bay Observation Well Network Review.
  • Eyre Peninsula, South Australia

    Eyre Peninsula, South Australia

    Golden Island, Coffin Bay National Park Coffin Bay Oyster Walk Emu’s on foreshore and then bedded down in Oyster White Sandhills, Seven Mile Beach Town’s shallow waters to await National and Conservation Parks market day, when the oysters would Currently the oyster farms located in Mount Dutton and Kellidie Bays are horses bred in this area as remounts for be taken to Port Lincoln and The parks range from rocky coastal islands to the mainland with windswept used mostly as nursery sites and only small oysters are grown on them. troops during World War One. The remaining Wangary A scenic four kilometre drive north along the cliff tops will shipped to Adelaide. The waters off cliffs and sweeping beaches exposed to the might of the southern ocean. The majority of the leases are situated 15 kilometres from the town of Coffin ponies have been relocated to nearby private take you to Gallipoli Beach where the movie “Gallipoli” Oyster Town were so heavily This contrasts with the tranquil waters and shores of the bays with spectacular Established in the late 1800’s to service the local Bay on the sand banks south of Point Longnose in Port Douglas Bay. Up land. Kellidie Bay Conservation Park is a starring Mel Gibson was filmed. dredged that the native oysters sand dunes and extensive heath lands that give way to dense mallee and community, today it houses the Lake Wangary to 20 oyster boats can be seen plying the waterways each day with much smaller park at 1,786 ha whilst Mount significantly declined and the town remnant sheoak woodland, once the domain of the glossy-black cockatoos.
  • LOWER EYRE PENINSULA Fax : 08 8682 1843 Your fi Rst Port of Call

    LOWER EYRE PENINSULA Fax : 08 8682 1843 Your fi Rst Port of Call

    98 Tasman Terrace Port Lincoln SA 5606 Tel : 08 8682 1655 LOWER EYRE PENINSULA Fax : 08 8682 1843 Your fi rst port of call www.plrealestate.com 5 10 8 3 54 1 2 35 45 5 5 63 75 87 394 6 7 4 DISTRICT MAP INDEX 12 4 7 6 5 5 6 5 8 8 5 Y Albatross Isles...........................I8 Mena Hill..................................D3 5 2 2 7 5 7 W 5 6 H Avoid Bay Is. Con. Pk. ..............E1 Mikkira Station .........................G4 6 11 4 2 7 2 5 Blackfellows Point 6 6 5 5 4 Bicker Is. ..................................F6 Morgans Landing .....................D2 5 6 3 7 Mottled Cove Mottled Cove............................A9 Mount Hope 7 3 6 6 Big Swamp...............................E4 4 1 13 8 3 8 6 2 Mt Drummond..........................B2 Hall Bay 2 8 2 Butler Tanks 1 Blackfellows Pt.........................A2 2 5 Brooker 5 3 4 4 Cape Burr Black Rocks .............................E2 Mt Dutton.................................D3 A 3 Yeelanna 11 6 2 3 A Mt Dutton Bay ..........................E3 Point Drummond POINT 2 DRUMMOND RD 6 5 Kapinnie 5 7 10 7 Port Neill Blyth Is.....................................E9 Three Mt Gawler ................................E6 9 4 4 7 8 Boarding House Bay.................E1 BRATTEN 5 Brothers 5 6 2 8 Mt Greenly ...............................C3 3 3 3 4 Boston Bay...............................F6 3 8 5 6 7 10 3 Boston Is..................................F6 Mt Hope...................................A2 4 11 7 2 5 Murray Pt.................................G6 HWY Cape Hardy Bocaut Is..................................F9 9 14 Murrunatta Con. Pk ..................E4 Picnic 10 6 4 Ungarra 2 2 2 Brooker....................................A6 Beach Mt.
  • Iron Road Limited

    Iron Road Limited

    CENTRAL EYRE IRON PROJECT Mining Lease Proposal Response Document This page is left deliberately blank Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Joint Consultation Process ................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Submissions ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Response Documents .......................................................................................................... 2 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Declaration ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Background .......................................................................................................................... 4 3 Results of the Public Consultation Process ................................................................... 5 3.1 Out of Scope Comments ...................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Content of Submissions ....................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Notes to Consider ...............................................................................................................
  • Pesticides in Australian Waterways Overview

    Pesticides in Australian Waterways Overview

    Pesticides in Australian Waterways Overview “A Jigsaw with a Billion Missing Pieces” Report and maps compiled by Anthony Amis September 2016 [email protected] Amitraz 38 Table of Contents Amitrole 39 Introduction: 1 AMPA 41 Asulam 42 Findings 5 Atrazine 43 Breaches 9 Atrazine 2-Hydroxy 48 How to Use Publication 11 Atrazine 3-Hydroxy 49 Azinphos Methyl 50 Azoxystrobin 51 Pesticide Sheets Benalaxyl 52 1,3-Dichloropropene 13 Benomyl 53 2-Chlorophenol 14 Bensulfuron Methyl 54 2,2,-DPA 15 Bentazone 55 2,4-D 16 BHC-Alpha 56 2,4-Dichlorophenol 18 Bifenthrin 57 2,4,5-T 19 Bioresmethrin 58 2,4,6-Dichlorophenol 20 Boscalid 59 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 21 Bromacil 60 2,6-D 22 Bromoxynil 62 2,4,6-T 23 Bupirimate 63 3,4-Dichloroaniline 24 Buprofezin 64 4-Chlorophenoxy Acetic Acid 25 Captan 65 4,4-DDD 26 Carbaryl 66 4,4-DDE 27 Carbendazim 67 4,4-DDT 28 Carbofuran 68 Acephate 29 Carboxin 69 Acrolein 31 Carfentrazone-Ethyl 70 Aldicarb 32 Chlorantraniliprole 71 Aldrin 34 Chlordane 72 Alpha-Cypermethrin 35 Chlorphenvinphos 73 Ametryn 36 1i Chloropicrin 74 Difenconazole 109 Chlorothalonil 75 Diflubenzuron 110 Chlorpyrifos 76 Dimethanamid 111 Chlorsulfuron 77 Dimethoate 112 Chlorthal-Dimtheyl 78 Dimethomorph 114 Cis-Chlordane 79 Diphenylamine 115 Clomazone 80 Diquat 116 Clopyralid 81 Disulfoton 117 Clothiandin 82 Diuron 118 Cyanazine 83 Endosulfan 120 Cyfluthrin 84 Endothal 123 Cyhalothrin 85 Endrin 124 Cypermethrin 86 EPTC 125 Cyproconazole 87 Esfenvalerate 126 Cyprodinil 88 Ethion 127 Dachtal 89 Ethofumesate 128 Dalapon 90 Ethoprophos 129 DDT 91 Etridiazole
  • Why Mine Magnetite on the Eyre Peninsula. What Progress Has Centrex Made?

    Why Mine Magnetite on the Eyre Peninsula. What Progress Has Centrex Made?

    Why mine magnetite on the Eyre Peninsula. What progress has Centrex made? SOUTH AUSTRALIA’S DEVELOPING IRON ORE HUB Alastair Watts, General Manager Exploration SA Exploration and Mining Conference Dec 2011 DISCLAIMER FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS These materials include forward looking statements. Forward looking statements inherently involve subjective judgement and analysis and are subject to significant uncertainties, risks and contingencies, many of which are outside of the control of, and may be unknown to Centrex Metals Limited (‘Centrex’ or the ‘Company’). Actual results and developments may vary materially from those expressed in these materials. The types of uncertainties which are relevant to the Company may include, but are not limited to, commodity prices, political uncertainty, changes to the regulatory framework which applies to the business of the Company and general economic conditions. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward looking statements. Forward looking statements in these materials speak only at the date of issue. Subject to any continuing obligations under applicable law or any relevant stock exchange listing rules, the Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any of the forward looking statements or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. Forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning Centrex’s planned exploration program, targeted resources, commencement of product export and other statements that are not historical facts. When used in this document, the words such as “could”, “target”, “plan”, “estimate”, “intend”, “may”, “aim”, “potential”, “should”, and similar expressions reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such as statements involving risks and uncertainties and no assurance can be given that actual results be consistent with these forward-looking statements.