Merger Control Review
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Offshore Wind Submarine Cabling Overview Fisheries Technical Working Group
OFFSHOREoverview WIND SUBMARINE CABLING Fisheries Technical Working Group Final Report | Report Number 21-14 | April 2021 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Our Vision: New York is a global climate leader building a healthier future with thriving communities; homes and businesses powered by clean energy; and economic opportunities accessible to all New Yorkers. Our Mission: Advance clean energy innovation and investments to combat climate change, improving the health, resiliency, and prosperity of New Yorkers and delivering benefits equitably to all. Courtesy, Equinor, Dudgeon Offshore Wind Farm Offshore Wind Submarine Cabling Overview Fisheries Technical Working Group Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority Albany, NY Morgan Brunbauer Offshore Wind Marine Fisheries Manager Prepared by: Tetra Tech, Inc. Boston, MA Brian Dresser Director of Fisheries Programs NYSERDA Report 21-14 NYSERDA Contract 111608A April 2021 Notice This report was prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter “NYSERDA”). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NYSERDA or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, NYSERDA, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report. -
Merger Control 2018 Seventh Edition
Merger Control 2018 Seventh Edition Contributing Editors: Nigel Parr & Ross Mackenzie GLOBAL LEGAL INSIGHTS – MERGER CONTROL 2018, SEVENTH EDITION Editors Nigel Parr & Ross Mackenzie, Ashurst LLP Production Editor Andrew Schofi eld Senior Editors Suzie Levy Caroline Collingwood Group Consulting Editor Alan Falach Publisher Rory Smith We are extremely grateful for all contributions to this edition. Special thanks are reserved for Nigel Parr & Ross Mackenzie for all their assistance. Published by Global Legal Group Ltd. 59 Tanner Street, London SE1 3PL, United Kingdom Tel: +44 207 367 0720 / URL: www.glgroup.co.uk Copyright © 2018 Global Legal Group Ltd. All rights reserved No photocopying ISBN 978-1-912509-17-1 ISSN 2048-1292 This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice. Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication. This publication is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a qualifi ed professional when dealing with specifi c situations. The information contained herein is accurate as of the date of publication. Printed and bound by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY June 2018 CONTENTS Preface Nigel Parr & Ross Mackenzie, Ashurst LLP General chapter Anti-competitive buyer power under UK and EC merger control – too much of a good thing? Burak Darbaz, Ben Forbes & Mat Hughes, AlixPartners UK LLP 1 Country chapters Albania Anisa Rrumbullaku, CR PARTNERS 19 Australia Sharon Henrick & Wayne Leach, King & Wood Mallesons 24 Austria Astrid Ablasser-Neuhuber & Gerhard Fussenegger, bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte GmbH 39 Canada Micah Wood & Kevin H. -
Competition Bites – South-East Asia & Beyond
Client Update 2018 January Regional Competition Competition Bites – South-East Asia & Beyond Introduction Welcome to the latest edition of our competition law updates, which captures important developments in the last quarter of 2017, in South-East Asia and beyond. The last quarter has been marked by several international mergers that have been scrutinised by competition authorities in various jurisdictions, with Singapore becoming even more active. A number of mergers are being reviewed in Singapore, with some moved into a Phase 2. Separately, the Department of Justice in the US has moved to block the AT&T/Time Warner merger, while the merger has been cleared in Brazil subject to certain behavioural remedies. In Europe, eagerly awaited decisions in the internet and technology sector have been released. In particular, the European Court of Justice in its Coty decision has now confirmed that it may be permissible under certain circumstances for businesses to ban internet sales on third party platforms. The German Federal Cartel Office has also preliminarily indicated that Facebook’s collection and processing of user data could amount to an abuse of dominance. The quarter has also seen developments to the competition law regime in several countries. Amongst others, Philippines has issued its Rules on Merger Procedure, and has consulted on its draft merger notification threshold guidelines. Amendments to Australia’s Competition and Consumer Act 2010 has also entered into force, and changes to Singapore’s and South Africa’s Competition Acts are currently being consulted on. The Rajah & Tann Asia Competition & Trade Practice, which spans South-East Asia, continues to grow from strength to strength, alongside regulators who continue to be or have become more active, including in the Philippines, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Vietnam. -
Design of a Transoceanic Cable Protection System
Design of a Transoceanic Cable Protection System Technical Report Isaac Geisler Kumar Karra Felipe Cardenas Dane Underwood Faculty Advisor: Dr. Lance Sherry Sponsor: Mr. George Blaha, Raytheon _______________________________________________ Department of Systems Engineering and Operations Research George Mason University 4400 University Drive, Fairfax VA, 22030 December 9, 2015 Table of Contents 1.0 Context Analysis.......................................................................................................................4 1.1 Overview of Cable System ................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Cable Network as a Bandwidth Delivery Service........................................................................... 6 1.3 Cable Construction and Installation ............................................................................................... 8 1.4 Threats and Damage to Cables ...................................................................................................... 10 1.5 Damage Detection and Location Finding ...................................................................................... 14 1.6 Cable Repair Process ...................................................................................................................... 15 1.7 Cable Protections ............................................................................................................................ 19 2.0 Stakeholder Analysis .............................................................................................................21 -
The Impact of the New Substantive Test in European Merger Control
April 2006 European Competition Journal 9 A New Test in European Merger Control THE IMPACT OF THE NEW SUBSTANTIVE TEST IN EUROPEAN MERGER CONTROL LARS-HENDRIK RÖLLER AND MIGUEL DE LA MANO* A. INTRODUCTION After a two-year review process, the European Commission adopted on 1 May 2004 a new Merger Regulation,1 replacing the old EU Merger Regulation of 1990. In addition, guidelines on the assessment of horizontal mergers were issued.2 During this review process, one of the most controversial and intensively debated issues surrounding the future regime of European merger control was the new substantive test, the so-called SIEC (“significant impediment of effective competition”) test. This paper addresses the issue of whether the new merger test has made any difference in the way the Commission evaluates the competitive effects of mergers. We approach this question by reviewing the main arguments of why the test was changed and discuss the anticipated impact. It is argued that the new test can be expected to increase both the accuracy and effectiveness of merger control in two ways: first, it may close a gap in enforcement, which may have led to underenforcement in the past; and secondly, it may add to clarity by eliminating ambiguities regarding the interpretation of the old test, which possibly led to overenforcement in some cases. The remainder of the paper looks at the evidence available to date. We review a number of cases and ask in what way—if any—the new merger regime has made a difference. In particular, we ask whether there is any evidence of the above issues of under- and overenforcement. -
Message Networking Help Maintenance Print Guide
Home | Search Message Networking Help Print | Back | Fwd | Close Getting Started Admin Maintenance Reference Home > Reference > Print Guides > Maintenance print guide Maintenance print guide This print guides is a collection of Message Networking Help system topics provided in an easy-to-print format for your convenience. Please note that some of the topics link to tasks that are not included in the PDF file. The online system contains all Message Networking documentation and is your primary source of information. This printable guide contains the following topics: Topic Page Number Performing basic maintenance 2 Performing software management 8 Viewing system configuration and status 19 Reviewing Message Networking logs 27 Performing hardware maintenance 97 Backing up the system 211 Generating reports 219 Running database audits 253 Displaying the message queue 256 Performing voice equipment diagnostics 257 Changing the system's network address length 262 Changing a remote machine's mailbox number 263 Changing the Message Networking network addressing 263 Restoring backed-up system files 264 Troubleshooting the system 266 ©2006 Avaya Inc. All rights reserved. Last modified 7 April, 2006 1 Home | Search Message Networking Help Print | Back | Fwd | Close Getting Started Admin Maintenance Reference Home > Maintenance > Performing basic maintenance Performing basic maintenance This topic describes how to perform the following tasks: ! Accessing the product ID ! Checking and setting the system clock ! Starting the messaging software (voice system) ! Stopping the messaging software (voice system) ! Shutting down the system ! Checking the reboot schedule ! Performing a system reboot Top of page Home | Search Message Networking Help Print | Back | Fwd | Close Getting Started Admin Maintenance Reference Home > Maintenance > Performing basic maintenance > Accessing the product ID Accessing the product ID The product ID is a 10-digit number used to identify each Message Networking system. -
Merger Control 2021
Merger Control 2021 A practical cross-border insight into merger control issues 17th Edition Featuring contributions from: Advokatfirmaet Grette AS Drew & Napier LLC Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa Inc AlixPartners ELIG Gürkaynak Attorneys-at-Law OLIVARES ALRUD Law Firm Hannes Snellman Attorneys Ltd Pinheiro Neto Advogados AMW & Co. Legal Practitioners L&L Partners Law Offices Portolano Cavallo AnesuBryan & David Lee and Li, Attorneys-at-Law PUNUKA Attorneys & Solicitors Arthur Cox LNT & Partners Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd Ashurst LLP MinterEllison Schoenherr Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Moravčević, Vojnović i Partneri AOD Beograd in Shin & Kim LLC BUNTSCHECK Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH cooperation with Schoenherr Sidley Austin LLP DeHeng Law Offices MPR Partners | Maravela, Popescu & Asociații URBAN STEINECKER GAŠPEREC BOŠANSKÝ Dittmar & Indrenius MSB Associates Zdolšek Attorneys at law DORDA Rechtsanwälte GmbH Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu Table of Contents Expert Chapters Reform or Revolution? The Approach to Assessing Digital Mergers 1 David Wirth & Nigel Parr, Ashurst LLP The Trend Towards Increasing Intervention in UK Merger Control and Cases that Buck the Trend 9 Ben Forbes, Felix Hammeke & Mat Hughes, AlixPartners Q&A Chapters Albania Japan 18 Schoenherr: Srđana Petronijević, Danijel Stevanović 182 Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu: Ryohei Tanaka & & Jelena Obradović Kota Suzuki Australia Korea 27 MinterEllison: Geoff Carter & Miranda Noble 191 Shin & Kim LLC: John H. Choi & Sangdon Lee Austria Mexico 36 DORDA Rechtsanwälte GmbH: Heinrich -
Second Anniversary Issue
An international forum for the expression of ideas and opinions pertaining to the submarine telecoms industry Issue 11 November 2003 Second 1 Issue Anniversary Contents Editor’s Exordium 3 Tracking the Cableships 38 Emails to the Editor 4 Letter to a Friend Jean Devos 41 NewsNow A brief synopsis of current news items 5 Upcoming Conferences 42 Maintenance News 8 SubOptic goes from strength to strength Advertisers John Horne 11 C&W GOES 5,6,40 New life discovered in the Caribbean OFS 7 Julian Rawle 14 Global Marine 8,9,10 SubOptic 2004 13 Reliability by design Great Eastern 19 In practice and in the field Dr Barbara Dean and Dr Jeff Gardner 20 Tyco Telecommunications 24 STF Reprints 25 A unique event PTC 2004 26 The PTC 2004: New Times - New Strategies Fugro 29 Richard Nickelson 27 CTC 30 Lloyds Register 30 Those other submarine utilities Caldwell Marine 32 Bill Wall 31 STF Marketplace 34 It’s not all a bed of roses Nexans 37 Scott Griffith 35 WFN Strategies 40 2 Submarine Telecoms Forum is published quarterly by WFN Strategies, L.L.C. The publication may not be reproduced ExordiumExordiumExordium or transmitted in any form, in whole or in part, without the November’s issue marks the second anniversary of Submarine Telecoms Forum, and permission of the publishers. Liability: while every care is what a ride it has been, not only for us your humble editors, but the industry taken in preparation of this publication, the publishers as a whole. cannot be held responsible for the accuracy of the In our first issue, we set out a few principles, which we have tried to hold information herein, or any errors which may occur in firm. -
FCC-03-9A1.Pdf
Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-9 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) Telecommunications Services Inside Wiring ) ) Customer Premises Equipment ) CS Docket No. 95-184 ) In the Matter of ) Implementation of the Cable Television Consumer ) MM Docket No. 92-260 Protection and Competition Act of 1992; Cable ) Home Wiring ) FIRST ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION AND SECOND REPORT AND ORDER Adopted: January 21, 2003 Released: January 29, 2003 By the Commission: Commissioner Copps issuing a statement; Commissioner Martin approving in part, dissenting in part and issuing a statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 II. ISSUES RAISED IN THE PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION .......................................... 4 A. Legal Authority of the Commission ................................................................................... 4 B. Application of Building-by-Building Disposition Procedures............................................ 5 C. Control of Home Run Wiring ............................................................................................. 7 D. Removal of Wiring by Incumbent Providers………………… .......................................... 8 E. Arbitration/Independent Pricing Experts………………………….. ................................ 10 F. MDU Owner Compensation ............................................................................................ -
CP Cable Protection Systems
English Instructions for use Cable protection systems CP-SA, CP-HT, CP-ML, CP-AF, CP-SE for the best-possible protection of cables in heavy-duty applications Read the Instructions for use prior to assembly, starting installation and handling! Keep for future reference! Translation of the original instructions for use CP_Manual-en_R2(2021-08-18)ID77847.docx ID 77847 Cable protection systems Instructions for use Trademark Brand names and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owner. Protected trademarks bearing a ™ or ® symbol are not always depicted as such in the manual. However, the statutory rights of the respective owners remain unaffected. Manufacturer / publisher Johannes Hubner Fabrik elektrischer Maschinen GmbH Siemensstraße 7 35394 Giessen Germany Phone: +49 641 7969 0 Fax: +49 641 73645 Internet: www.huebner-giessen.com E-Mail: [email protected] The manual has been drawn up with the utmost care and attention. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility of errors in form and content. It is strictly forbidden to reproduce this publication or parts of this publication in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of Johannes Hubner Fabrik elektrischer Maschinen GmbH. Subject to errors and changes due to technical improvements. Copyright © Johannes Hübner Fabrik elektrischer Maschinen GmbH. All rights reserved. Further current information on this product series can be found online in our Service Point. Simply scan the QR Code and open the link in your browser. 2 CP_Manual-en_R2(2021-08-18)ID77847.docx Cable protection systems Instructions for use Contents 1 General ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Information about the Instructions for use ................................................................. -
Prohibition Criteria in Merger Control – Dominant Position Versus Substantial Lessening of Competition?
Prohibition Criteria in Merger Control – Dominant Position versus Substantial Lessening of Competition? - Discussion Paper - Bundeskartellamt Discussion paper for the meeting of the Working Group on Competition Law1 on 8 and 9 October 2001 Prohibition Criteria in Merger Control - Dominant Position versus Substantial Lessening of Competition? translated version 1 Each year in autumn the Bundeskartellamt invites the Working Group on Competition Law, a group of university professors from faculties of law and economics, to participate in a two-day discussion on a current issue relating to competition policy or competition law. As the basis for their discussion the participants receive a working paper prepared by the Bundeskartellamt in advance of the conference. The present document contains the working paper prepared for the 2001 conference as well as a brief summary of the conclusions of the conference. - I - TABLE OF CONTENTS page A. Introduction 1 B. Concepts for the evaluation of mergers 2 I. Germany 2 II. European Union 4 III. United States 6 IV. Australia 10 V. United Kingdom / New Zealand 11 VI. Intermediate result 13 C. Evaluation of "problematic" mergers in practice 15 I. Oligopolies 15 1. Economic background 16 2. Evaluation in practice 17 3. Intermediate result 23 II. Vertical integration 24 1. Economic background 24 2. Evaluation in practice 25 3. Intermediate result 28 III. Conglomerate mergers 29 1. Economic background 29 2. Evaluation in practice 30 3. Intermediate result 33 D. Conclusions 34 ANNEX: Evaluation criteria in merger control II BIBLIOGRAPHY VI ABBREVIATIONS X - 1 - A. Introduction The preconditions for prohibiting company mergers are completely identical in only a few legal systems. -
The Merger Control Review
[ Exclusively for: Suncica Vaglenarova | 09-Sep-15, 07:52 AM ] ©The Law Reviews The MergerThe Control Review Merger Control Review Sixth Edition Editor Ilene Knable Gotts Law Business Research The Merger Control Review The Merger Control Review Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in The Merger Control Review - Edition 6 (published in July 2015 – editor Ilene Knable Gotts) For further information please email [email protected] The Merger Control Review Sixth Edition Editor Ilene Knable Gotts Law Business Research Ltd PUBLISHER Gideon Roberton BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT MANAGER Nick Barette SENIOR ACCOUNT MANAGERS Katherine Jablonowska, Thomas Lee, Felicity Bown ACCOUNT MANAGER Joel Woods PUBLISHING MANAGER Lucy Brewer MARKETING ASSISTANT Rebecca Mogridge EDITORIAL COORDINATOR Shani Bans HEAD OF PRODUCTION Adam Myers PRODUCTION EDITOR Anne Borthwick SUBEDITOR Caroline Herbert MANAGING DIRECTOR Richard Davey Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, London 87 Lancaster Road, London, W11 1QQ, UK © 2015 Law Business Research Ltd www.TheLawReviews.co.uk No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided. The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein. Although the information provided is accurate as of July 2015, be advised that this is a developing area. Enquiries concerning reproduction should be sent to Law Business Research, at the address above.