DOCSLIB.ORG

Pennsylvania West Virginia Virginia Maryland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pennsylvania West Virginia Virginia Maryland ek 68 Cre ills 0 1 5 10 Kilometers Canal Terminus W N TA I N Feeder Dam 8 S M O U North Guard Lock 8 CUMBERLAND W I L L 01 5 10 Miles ALT 28 Cumberland Visitor Center 220 28 Evitts Creek Aqueduct Canal and North Branch 180 towpath trail Other trail Evitts Creek Canal mileage Rapids and E V I 20 Locks 74-75 Lock 73 T T S M O U N TA I N marker hazardous areas Irons Mountain Patterson Creek Lock 72 68 Boat launch Restrooms Spring Gap SPRING GAP Picnic area Drive-in camping area Telephone Hiker-biker campsite 51 W A R R I O R M Wheelchair accessible 28 170 O U N TA I N Pigmans Ferry Creek Oldtown-Battie Mixon Lock 71 n South OLDTOWN w N Bra o M O U N TA I nch Locks 69-70 T P O L I S H Po ek toma re c River C Potomac Forks GREEN RIDGE Lock 68 ile STATE FOREST enm Fifte G R E E N R I D G E PENNSYLVANIA Town Creek Aqueduct Lock 67 T O W N H I L L Locks Lock 61 Lock 62-66 59 160 Sorrel Devils Alley 68 Purslane Run Ridge Creek Lock ll Tunnel Hill Trail 58 LITTLE ORLEANS i PAW PAW H 150 Indigo Neck Lock 60 ng 9 140 eli Lock 57 Sid Stickpile L L P H I 29 Hill E L I N G Paw Paw Tunnel Fifteenmile Sideling Hill Creek Aqueduct E S I D N 29 (3,118 ft long) Lock 56 M Creek N A Aqueduct S R Y 70 Y L L V Locks 54-55 A A 9 N N GREAT CACAPON Cacapon D I A River Junction C pon Lock aca 53 O N M O U N TA I N 127 A P 130 A C Leopards Mill C HANCOCK 522 BERKELEY SPRINGS Little Tonoloway Hancock Visitor Center Locks 51-52 Tonoloway Creek Aqueduct r e TN v M WEST i EYS Little Pool CK R DI VIRGINIA 120 TUSCARORA MTN 9 c a m 70 o t o P TA I N U N 522 Licking Creek O Aqueduct M V E C O A V D W Big Pool M Back C reek FORT FREDERICK STATE PARK 56 McCoys Ferry N O R T H North M O U N TA I N HEDGESVILLE Mountain CLEAR SPRING WHITE HALL 739 110 Locks Four Locks Ranger Station 47-50 Lock 46 40 51 9 Dam 5 Lock 45 WINCHESTER 70 Creek gue 81 hea 68 Conococ 11 Jordan MARTINSBURG 11 Junction Cumberland Valley Conococheague 100 Creek 63 Potomac Aqueduct Midpoint of C&O Canal Lock Edison 43 Dam Williamsport Visitor Center Cushwa Basin Opequon Junction Lock 44 90 Lock 41 VIRGINIA WILLIAMSPORT Lock 42 81 7 9 45 Guard Lock 4 WEST VIRGINIA Big Slackwater 11 Dam 4 63 68 Snyders Landing Big Woods HAGERSTOWN Lock Taylors Landing 40 BERRYVILLE Killiansburg Cave 80 SHEPHERDSTOWN 65 Lock 38 Horseshoe Park Headquarters Creek Lock 39 Bend 340 CHARLES TOWNPack Horse Ford SHARPSBURG tam Antie Antietam Creek 70 70 Ranger Station 40 9 (walk-in camp) ALT ANTIETAM 34 40 Dargan Bend ANTIETAM NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD ver Lock 37 Antietam Sh Ri Huckleberry Hill Creek enandoah Aqueduct BOONSBORO Dam 3 Fort Trail DARGAN Locks 35-36 Duncan A I N achian U N T HARPERS FERRY Lock 34 HARPERS FERRY Appal M O Lock 33 NATIONAL HISTORICAL ROHRERSVILLE lachian Trail PARK Appa Footbridge Lock 32 (hazardous river E conditions) R I D G 60 B L U E 67 U T H WEVERTON S O 671 Lock 31 17 7 A D V M 17 9 79 LOVETTSVILLE Brunswick Visitor Center Lock 30 P 287 o BRUNSWICK MIDDLETOWN t PURCELLVILLE o 340 m 464 N a TA I c Catoctin Creek U N Aqueduct M O 50 LANDER BRADDOCK 15 HAMILTON Bald Eagle Island Lock 29 HEIGHTS Lock 28 POINT OF ROCKS 15 15 I N O C T VIRGINIA C A T 340 Calico Rocks R i v 15 e 28 FREDERICK r 15 LEESBURG Nolands Ferry 85 Whites Ferry er (operating toll ferry) Monocacy iv way R en Spinks Indian Flats re Ferry G 40 Turtle Run Monocacy River Aqueduct s Marble MONOCACY e l l Quarry Lock Monocacy River NATIONAL u Woods D 27 BATTLEFIELD 107 Lock SUGAR LOAF 40 Goos (Lock 26) MOUNTAIN e Creek Broad Run Trunk DICKERSON (aqueduct) 28 Lock 25 267 Edwards Ferry 70 30 BEALLSVILLE 7 109 Chisel Branch M V POOLESVILLE D A 107 28 McKEE BESHER WASHINGTON ek WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT re C DULLES AREA 270 INTERNATIONAL Horsepen ca AIRPORT Branch ne Se 28 STERLING PARK Seneca Creek Seneca Quarry Aqueduct SENECA MOUNT AIRY Rileys Lock (Lock 24) 118 Violettes Lock (Lock 23) 267 HERNDON Dam 2 D u 112 DARNESTOWN l le s A i MARYLAND r p 20 Pennyfield o r t Lock 22 A 193 RESTON c c Ge e o S rg 190 28 s e e d eto s eta w il m n t R 7 ap o S o o w GAITHERSBURG a n fr ain d on s Washington t Loc a Aqueduct k n GREAT d Dam FALLS Swains T o PARK Lock l l R Great Falls Tavern Visitor Center o Canal boat rides a d Angler’s 189 Marsden Inn POTOMAC 97 VIENNA Tract 190 ROCKVILLE 66 Carderock 270 OLNEY 10 12 Seven Locks 11 13 14 41 38 10 70 39 k FAIRFAX 40 e 9 e BETHESDA r McLEAN C Cabin John ck 495 FALLS Creek 35 o R CHURCH 34 236 ARLINGTON 97 ANNANDALE 495 MD D 31 7 A C WHEATON 66 V 50 C ROCK CREEK D PARK SILVER 30 ELLICOTT SPRING COLUMBIA CITY 395 Tidewater Lock 0 Milepost Georgetown Visitor Center 29 Canal boat rides 95 95 ALEXANDRIA 27 COLLEGE WASHINGTON 95 PARK 25 CATONSVILLE DC 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Resources Compared
    Water Resources Overview The goals of the Water Resources Chapter are listed below: - Protect the water supply from pollution and encroachment of developments. - Provide an adequate and safe drinking water supply to serve the existing and future residents of the City of Frederick. - Provide an adequate capacity of wastewater treatment with effluent meeting all necessary regulatory requirements for existing and future residents of the City. - Restore and protect water quality and contribute toward meeting the water qualityby striving to meet or exceed regulatory requirements. for water quality. This will require addressinginclude current water quality impacts as well as future impacts from land development and population growth. - Develop adequate stormwater management. - Protect the habitat value of the local and regional rivers and streams. - Efficiently use public dollars for infrastructure that ensures sustainable, safe, and adequate supply of water for all residents. The City is committed to ensuring water and wastewater (sewer) capacity for both existing and new developments andwhile minimizing the negative impacts of stormwater runoff. In 2002, the City established the Water and Sewer Allocation System to make certain that adequate treatment capacity for potable water and wastewater is in place for new growth prior to approval. In 2012, Ordinance G-12-13 was adopted which updated the allocation process and combined it with it the Impact Fees payable for water and sewer service. The City adopted an Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO) in 2007 that allows development to proceed only after it has been demonstrated that sufficient infrastructure exists or will be created in the water and wastewater systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report
    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds Within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Appendix – Priority Brook Trout Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Appendix Table I. Subwatersheds within the Chesapeake Bay watershed that have a priority score ≥ 0.79. HUC 12 Priority HUC 12 Code HUC 12 Name Score Classification 020501060202 Millstone Creek-Schrader Creek 0.86 Intact 020501061302 Upper Bowman Creek 0.87 Intact 020501070401 Little Nescopeck Creek-Nescopeck Creek 0.83 Intact 020501070501 Headwaters Huntington Creek 0.97 Intact 020501070502 Kitchen Creek 0.92 Intact 020501070701 East Branch Fishing Creek 0.86 Intact 020501070702 West Branch Fishing Creek 0.98 Intact 020502010504 Cold Stream 0.89 Intact 020502010505 Sixmile Run 0.94 Reduced 020502010602 Gifford Run-Mosquito Creek 0.88 Reduced 020502010702 Trout Run 0.88 Intact 020502010704 Deer Creek 0.87 Reduced 020502010710 Sterling Run 0.91 Reduced 020502010711 Birch Island Run 1.24 Intact 020502010712 Lower Three Runs-West Branch Susquehanna River 0.99 Intact 020502020102 Sinnemahoning Portage Creek-Driftwood Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.03 Intact 020502020203 North Creek 1.06 Reduced 020502020204 West Creek 1.19 Intact 020502020205 Hunts Run 0.99 Intact 020502020206 Sterling Run 1.15 Reduced 020502020301 Upper Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.07 Intact 020502020302 Kersey Run 0.84 Intact 020502020303 Laurel Run 0.93 Reduced 020502020306 Spring Run 1.13 Intact 020502020310 Hicks Run 0.94 Reduced 020502020311 Mix Run 1.19 Intact 020502020312 Lower Bennett Branch Sinnemahoning Creek 1.13 Intact 020502020403 Upper First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek 0.96
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake & Ohio Canal, Conococheague Creek
    CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL, HAER No. MD-123 CONOCOCHEAGUE CREEK AQUEDUCT (Chesapeake & Ohio Canal, Aqueduct No. 5) Milepost 99.80 Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Park Williamsport flttfe MD Washington County Maryland Po, 2r PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF MEASURED DRAWINGS Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior P.O. Box 37127 Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 mb HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD 3- CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL, CONOCOCHEAGUE CREEK AQUEDUCT (Chesapeake & Ohio Canal, Aqueduct No. 5) HAER NO. MD-123 Location: Milepost 99.80, in Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Park, Williamsport, Washington County, Maryland. Date of Construction: 1833-34 Builder: Michael Byrne and Company Frederick, Maryland Present Owner Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Present Use: Bike and foot path / Significance The Conococheague Creek Aqueduct was the fifth of eleven masonry aqueduct constructed along the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal. It was the last and most ornate of the system1s five multiple span aqueducts Historian: Lee R. Maddex Institute for the History of Technology and Industrial Archaeology West Virginia University Morgantown, West Virginia 26506 Project Information: This recording project is part of the Historic American Engineering Record(HAER), a long-range program to document historically significant engineering and industrial works in the United States. The HAER program is administered by the Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record division(HABS/HAER) of the National Park Service, US Department of the Interior. The Conococheague Creek Aqueduct CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL, CONOCOCHEAGUE CREEK AQUEDUCT HAER No. MD-123 (Page 2) Recording project was cosponsored during the summer of 1996 by HABS/HAER under the general direction of Blaine Cliver, Chief, and by the Institute for the History of Technology and Industrial Archaeology (IHTIA), Emory L.
    [Show full text]
  • Watersheds.Pdf
    Watershed Code Watershed Name 02130705 Aberdeen Proving Ground 02140205 Anacostia River 02140502 Antietam Creek 02130102 Assawoman Bay 02130703 Atkisson Reservoir 02130101 Atlantic Ocean 02130604 Back Creek 02130901 Back River 02130903 Baltimore Harbor 02130207 Big Annemessex River 02130606 Big Elk Creek 02130803 Bird River 02130902 Bodkin Creek 02130602 Bohemia River 02140104 Breton Bay 02131108 Brighton Dam 02120205 Broad Creek 02130701 Bush River 02130704 Bynum Run 02140207 Cabin John Creek 05020204 Casselman River 02140305 Catoctin Creek 02130106 Chincoteague Bay 02130607 Christina River 02050301 Conewago Creek 02140504 Conococheague Creek 02120204 Conowingo Dam Susq R 02130507 Corsica River 05020203 Deep Creek Lake 02120202 Deer Creek 02130204 Dividing Creek 02140304 Double Pipe Creek 02130501 Eastern Bay 02141002 Evitts Creek 02140511 Fifteen Mile Creek 02130307 Fishing Bay 02130609 Furnace Bay 02141004 Georges Creek 02140107 Gilbert Swamp 02130801 Gunpowder River 02130905 Gwynns Falls 02130401 Honga River 02130103 Isle of Wight Bay 02130904 Jones Falls 02130511 Kent Island Bay 02130504 Kent Narrows 02120201 L Susquehanna River 02130506 Langford Creek 02130907 Liberty Reservoir 02140506 Licking Creek 02130402 Little Choptank 02140505 Little Conococheague 02130605 Little Elk Creek 02130804 Little Gunpowder Falls 02131105 Little Patuxent River 02140509 Little Tonoloway Creek 05020202 Little Youghiogheny R 02130805 Loch Raven Reservoir 02139998 Lower Chesapeake Bay 02130505 Lower Chester River 02130403 Lower Choptank 02130601 Lower
    [Show full text]
  • The Potomac Watershed Partnership the Potomac Watershed Partnership Thethe Monocacymonocacy Catoctincatoctin Watershedwatershed Alliancealliance
    DevelopingDeveloping LocalLocal WorkgroupsWorkgroups andand AcquiringAcquiring FundingFunding: A Case Study From the Potomac River Watershed Bryan Seipp, Director of Restoration/Forester MissionMission StatementsStatements The Potomac The Monocacy & Watershed Partnership (PWP) Catoctin Watershed Alliance is a collaborative effort among coordinates the efforts of a federal, state, and local diverse group of stakeholders partners to restore the health of dedicated to the protection the land and waters of the the land and waters of the and restoration of the natural Potomac River Basin, thereby enhancing the quality of life resources in the MonocacyMonocacy && and overall health of the Catoctin watersheds. Chesapeake Bay. TheThe PotomacPotomac WatershedWatershed PartnershipPartnership Watershed Size: 14,670 sq. miles Population: Nearly 5 million Population: Nearly 5 million nd 2 Largest Contributor of Freshwater to the Chesapeake Bay Largest Contributor of Sediment to the Chesapeake Bay TheThe MonocacyMonocacy CatoctinCatoctin WatershedWatershed AllianceAlliance Watershed Size: 320,807 acres Third Fastest growing area in Maryland 78% of the Land Zoned Agricultural Lowest percentage of healthy riparian forests and wetlands Most forest tracts destroyed by gypsy moths and wildfire Highest levels of nutrient and sediment pollution Greatest development pressures in the Potomac basin DevelopmentDevelopment andand WorkWork PlansPlans PWPPWP Formed in 2000 through a USDA Forest Service Initiative. In its first year, the partnership completed a strategic forest assessment for the Potomac watershed to determine where the highest priority forestlands were in most need of restoration, in both rural and urban areas. At the time of the assessment, the Shenandoah River and the Monocacy River and Antietam Creek sub-watersheds had the lowest percentage of healthy riparian forests and wetlands; the highest levels of nutrient and sediment pollution; the most forest tracts destroyed by gypsy moths and wildfire; and some of the greatest development pressures in the Potomac basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Monocacy River at Jug Bridge Near Frederick, MD
    Top10 Highest Historical Crests: Monocacy River at Jug Bridge near Frederick, MD Latitude: 39.403 Period of Record: 1889-Present Longitude: -77.366 Flood Stage: 15 Last Flood: 12/16/2018 Number of Floods: 123 Date of Flood Crest (ft) Streamflow (cfs) Weather Summary 6/23/1972 35.9 81,600 Hurricane Agnes made landfall again over southeastern New York on June 22 and moved westward into Pennsylvania. Rainfall totals from June 20-25 range from 2-3 inches in the Upper Potomac to 18 inches near Shamokin, Pennsylvania. 9/26/1975 30.8 61,200 The remnants of Hurricane Eloise combined with a cold front and produced very heavy rainfall in the Mid- Atlantic. Washington, D.C. reported 9.08" of rainfall. Total damage for Virginia was estimated to be $17.2 million. 6/1/1889 30 56,000 A mesoscale convective complex caused 9 inches of rain to fall in 36 hours with 4 inches of rain occurring in 8 hours. Most of Williamsport, Lock Haven, Muncy, Jersey Shore and Montgomery were submerged. 8/24/1933 28.1 51,000 A strong Category 1 storm, the Chesapeake-Potomac Hurricane brought more than 10 inches of rain to Maryland, Delaware and Southern New Jersey. Other locations throughout the Mid-Atlantic measured more than 4 inches of rain. 10/10/1976 25.38 43,500 A low pressure system and its slow moving front produced 2 to 5 inches of rainfall at most locations through the Mid-Atlantic Region. 1/20/1996 23.67 37,400 Southerly winds, high dewpoints and intense rainfall caused a rapid snowmelt.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Road Ready E-Brochure Summer Update
    2017 Road Ready e‐Brochure Summer Update A Comprehensive Electronic Guide to Major Road Construction (SHA photo: Aerial view of the MD 195 (Carroll Avenue) Bridge over Sligo Creek and Sligo Creek Parkway rehabilitation project in Takoma Park, Montgomery County.) Know your Road The Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) crews maintain 17,824 lane miles of the state’s highways and toll roads. If you observe an issue on a State-maintained road, we remind Marylanders that there are three types of state-maintained roads in Maryland: Click here for a rundown of which agency maintains what road. Interstate sign Roads with US numbered routes Roads with MD numbered routes. If you don’t see one of these signs on your road, you probably do NOT live on a state-maintained road. Work Zone Safety is in Your Hands Work Zone Safety In addition to the major projects listed, you may also encounter mobile or short-term work zones. Always expect the unexpected, pay extra close attention and drive slowly through any work zone. Whether it’s a tree trimming operation or a bridge project, be aware when orange is there: Think Orange (the color of construction equipment and signs), stay alert and slow down. Everyone is at risk. Real-time travel information is available for free by using Maryland 511. Motorists should call 511, 1-855- GOMD511 or visit www.md511.org for current travel information. Sign up to personalize travel route information through MY511 on the website. Remember to use 511 safely – Maryland law prohibits hand- held mobile phone use and texting while driving.
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac Basin Large River Environmental Flow Needs
    Potomac Basin Large River Environmental Flow Needs PREPARED BY James Cummins, Claire Buchanan, Carlton Haywood, Heidi Moltz, Adam Griggs The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street Suite PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 R. Christian Jones, Richard Kraus Potomac Environmental Research and Education Center George Mason University 4400 University Drive, MS 5F2 Fairfax, VA 22030-4444 Nathaniel Hitt, Rita Villella Bumgardner U.S. Geological Survey Leetown Science Center Aquatic Ecology Branch 11649 Leetown Road, Kearneysville, WV 25430 PREPARED FOR The Nature Conservancy of Maryland and the District of Columbia 5410 Grosvenor Lane, Ste. 100 Bethesda, MD 20814 WITH FUNDING PROVIDED BY The National Park Service Final Report May 12, 2011 ICPRB Report 10-3 To receive additional copies of this report, please write Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe St., PE-08 Rockville, MD 20852 or call 301-984-1908 Disclaimer This project was made possible through support provided by the National Park Service and The Nature Conservancy, under the terms of their Cooperative Agreement H3392060004, Task Agreement J3992074001, Modifications 002 and 003. The content and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the policy of the National Park Service or The Nature Conservancy and no official endorsement should be inferred. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the opinions or policies of the U. S. Government, or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. Acknowledgments This project was supported by a National Park Service subaward provided by The Nature Conservancy Maryland/DC Office and by the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin, an interstate compact river basin commission of the United States Government and the compact's signatories: Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and the District of Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in Montgomery County
    League of Women Voters of Montgomery County, MD, Inc. (rev. 4/1/2014) Fact Sheet, April 2014 WATER QUALITY IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY INTRODUCTION The state of Maryland is responsible for implementing the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act and has delegated to the counties Lower the responsibility for preparing a strategic plan for achieving Monocacy the standards set out in the Clean Water Act for each watershed within the county. Seneca Creek Patuxent As shown in the individual watershed reports below, the overall water quality in Montgomery varies considerably, driven Upper Potomac Direct mostly by the degree of urbanized Rock development of the land. Further Creek development in the county constitutes a Lower significant potential for further degradation Potomac Anacostia Direct of the water supply and significantly increases threats of flooding when development occurs on flood plains Cabin in the area. Stormwater runoff, containing nutrients used on farmlands John and on lawns and gardens in developed areas, as well as increased runoff volume due to the increased creation of impervious surfaces, provides a significant threat to water quality in the two rivers bordering the county and to the Chesapeake Bay, into which both rivers drain. To successfully meet its regulatory requirements and environmental goals, Montgomery County must complete watershed assessments on all county lands on a 5-year rotation and develop a specific implementation plan to correct deficiencies found. The implementation plan must include plans to meet the requirements of the County’s National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) permit to show progress toward meeting the waste-load allocations for the Environmental Protection Agency-approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDLs) for various reservoirs within the county and how they will affect the Chesapeake Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Overview W a R R I O R M O U N Referred to As Other Important Resources and Values.Program 28 170 T a I N
    Other Important Resources and Values NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Canal Place State Heritage Area No 68 ek rth Canal Terminus Cre Bran Feeder Dam 8 ills 0 1 5 10 Kilometers Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park contains ch Po W t Guard Lock 8 A I N omac R M O U N T iver CUMBERLAND W I L L S 0 1 5 10 Miles ALT Cumberland Visitor Center 220 28 43C North 28 other resources and values that may not be fundamental to Evitts Creek Aqueduct Canal and Other trail North Branch 180 towpath trail Evitts Creek Canal mileage Rapids and E V I T 20 Locks 73–75 T S M O U N T A I N marker hazardous area the purpose and significance of the park, but are important to Lockhouse 75 Irons Mountain Patterson Wheelchair-accessible Boat launch Creek Lock 72 68 Spring Gap Spring Gap Restrooms Drive-in camping area consider in management and planning decisions. These are Picnic area Hiker-biker campsite 51 Emergency telephone Foundation Document Overview W A R R I O R M O U N referred to as other important resources and values.program 28 170 T A I N Pigmans Ferry Creek Oldtown-Battie Mixon Lock 71 n South w Bra Oldtown o M O U N T A I N nch Locks 69–70 T P O L I S H offer visitors the opportunity to experience different eras of the P k oto ee mac Ri Cr ve r Potomac Forks Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park GREEN RIDGE Lock 68 ile STATE FOREST enm canal’s existence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maryland Department of Natural Resources Conducted Limited Trout
    The Maryland Department of Natural Resources conducted limited trout stocking throughout Maryland this spring in an effort to alleviate overcrowding at state fish hatcheries, and also provide opportunity for recreational anglers. Following Gov. Larry Hogan’s executive orders to limit spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, state employees suspended all field activities, including regularly scheduled trout stocking. Without the scheduled stocking, state hatcheries lacked room needed to continue production for future seasons, and as trout in these facilities continued to grow, they were at risk of higher mortality. Removing fish and stocking them into public waters became an urgent matter. To date, the department has stocked 211,450 brown, golden, and rainbow trout across the state, at the locations listed below. Annual production at our hatcheries is about 300,000 trout. This completes trout stocking for the spring. The department encourages anglers to take advantage of the incredible fishing opportunities Maryland has to offer, provided all practice social distancing, avoid crowded areas, and minimize social interaction. Allegany County Battie Mixon: 1,500 Cotton Cove Pond: 600 Evitts Creek: 6,000 Fifteen Mile Creek: 3,700 Flintstone Creek: 1,000 Georges Creek: 500 Jennings Run: 4,500 N.B.P.R. Zero Creel: 1,900 North Jennings Run Watershed: 1,000 Rocky Gap: 4,400 Wills Creek: 5,500 Baltimore County Gunpowder Falls, Lower: 7,000 Gunpowder Falls, Upper: 3,000 Little Gunpowder Falls: 3,500 Patapsco River, Daniels: 2,000 Carroll County Farm Museum
    [Show full text]