DOCSLIB.ORG

Transport Committeeagenda

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transport Committeeagenda I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Transport Committee will be held on: Date: Tuesday, 5 July 2011 Time: 2.00 pm Meeting Room: Reception Lounge Venue: Auckland Town Hall 301-305 Queen Street Auckland Transport Committee OPEN AGENDA MEMBERSHIP Chairperson Cr Mike Lee Deputy Chairperson Cr Hon Chris Fletcher, QSO Cr Dr Cathy Casey Cr Sandra Coney, QSO Cr Des Morrison Cr Richard Northey, ONZM Cr Dick Quax Cr Sharon Stewart, QSM Cr Wayne Walker Cr Penny Webster Mr Glenn Wilcox Cr George Wood, CNZM Ex-Officio His Worship the Mayor, Len Brown, JP Deputy Mayor, Penny Hulse (Quorum 6 members) Desiree Tukutama Committee Secretary 30 June 2011 Contact Telephone: (09) 307 7576 Email: [email protected] Website: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted. Should Members require further information relating to any reports, please contact the relevant manager, Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson. Transport Committee 05 July 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE PROCEDURAL 1 Apologies 5 2 Declarations of Interest 5 3 Confirmation of Minutes 5 4 Leave of Absence 5 5 Acknowledgements 5 6 Petitions 5 7 Presentations 5 7.1 Rail Station Upgrade Programme 7.2 City Centre Bus Reorganisation 8 Deputations 5 8.1 Penlink Now 9 Public Forum 5 10 Extraordinary Business 6 11 Notices of Motion 6 10.1 Notice of Motion 6 DECISION MAKING Reports of Chief Executive 12 Funding Assistance Rates 7 13 Transport Access to Ports of Auckland 23 14 Consideration of Extraordinary Business Items INFORMATION Reports of Chief Executive 15 Correspondence 33 16 Consideration of Extraordinary Information Items Page 3 Transport Committee 05 July 2011 1 Apologies At the close of the agenda no apologies had been received. 2 Declaration of Interest Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making when a conflict arises between their role as an elected representative and any private or other external interest they might have. At the close of the agenda no requests for declarations of interest had been received. 3 Confirmation of Minutes 3.1 Meeting minutes Transport Committee, 7 Jun 2011 4 Leave of Absence At the close of the agenda no requests for leave of absence had been received. 5 Acknowledgements At the close of the agenda no requests for acknowledgements had been received. 6 Petitions 7 Presentations 7.1 Rail Stations Upgrade Programme Nick Seymour, Project Director Rail Improvements, from Auckland Transport, will provide a presentation to the Transport Committee on the rail stations upgrade programme in Auckland, including plans for Parnell station. 7.2 Central City Bus Reorganisation Anthony Cross, PT Network Planning Manager, from Auckland Transport, will provide a presentation to the Transport Committee on the proposed reorganisation of bus services and routes in the Central City and the Western Bays. 8 Deputations 8.1 Penlink Now Janet Fitzgerald, Chairperson/Spokesperson will give a presentation to the Transport Committee speaking in support of the Penlink project versus widening of Whangaparaoa Road. 9 Public Forum A period of time (approximately 30 minutes) is set aside for members of the public to address the meeting on matters within its delegated authority. A maximum of 3 minutes per item is allowed, following which there may be questions from members. At the close of the agenda no requests for public forum had been received. Page 5 Transport Committee 05 July 2011 10 Extraordinary Business Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states: “An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if - (a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and (b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, - (i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and (ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.” Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as amended) states: “Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting, - (a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if - (i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the local authority; and (ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a time when it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting; but (b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that item except to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for further discussion.” At the close of the agenda no requests for extraordinary business had been received. 11 Notices of Motion 11.1 Bus Lanes – Grafton Bridge In accordance with Standing Order 2.16, please place the following Notice of Motion on the agenda for the Transport Committee meeting being held on Tuesday, 5 July 2011: Recommendation a) That the Notice of Motion be received. b) That the Transport Committee requests Auckland Transport to conduct an independent audit for the operation of the restricted hours Bus Lanes across Grafton Bridge with particular emphasis on: • Ascertaining whether there is adequate warning of drivers of no-exempt vehicles as they approach the bridge from either end and also look at the legality and practicality of the placement and obstruction of the signage in relation to drivers’ line of sight as they approach the bridge; and • Changing the full green traffic lights allowing traffic to enter Grafton Bridge from Park Road, Grafton and Karangahape Road, Newton to “green arrows” diverting non-exempt traffic away from the bridge when the Bus Lane is in operation. Appendices A Notice of Motion - Bus Lanes Grafton Bridge ......................................................... 46 Page 6 Transport Committee 5 July 2011 Funding Assistance Rates File No.: CP2011/03989 Executive Summary Item 12 The purpose of this report is to consider New Zealand Transport Agency’s (NZTA) consultation on proposals to alter Funding Assistance Rates (FAR) and to identify points of feedback on these proposals. NZTA is proposing reductions in the percentage that NZTA would fund in relation to specific investment categories within public transport, transport planning and road user safety activity classes. The proposed FAR reductions would enable NZTA to fund more projects but at a lower rate. This report outlines the impact of these proposed changes for Auckland Council’s funding contribution to these transport activities. It estimates that the proposed changes will result in a loss of funding of approximately $14 million per annum, as applied to the 2011/12 budget. This reduction will have to be either recouped by an increase in Auckland Council funding or a reduction in Auckland Transport (AT) services in these activity classes. This report proposes that feedback be provided based around the following key points: • That a special case is made for rail related improvement in the Auckland region and reductions in FAR related to rail are phased in over a longer time period; • That the reductions to the FAR for transport planning activities are phased in over a longer time period and the grant for production and monitoring of the Regional Land Transport Strategy (RLTS) and Regional Land transport Programme (RLTP) is maintained or at least reduced gradually; • That any reductions in FAR for the Road Safety Community Programme are phased in over a 10 year time period; and • That the proposed full review of FAR in 2013 considers the transport priorities in Auckland in accordance with the Auckland Plan. Recommendations a) That the Funding Assistance Rates report be received. b) That the feedback on proposed changes to 2012 National Land Transport Programme co-investment ratios (funding assistance rates) be based on the points in the Decision Making section of this report. Background NZTA is seeking feedback to proposed changes to the FAR that apply to specific investment categories within public transport, transport planning and road user safety activity classes as set out in the Consultation document “Feedback on Proposed Changes to 2012 National Land Transport Programme co-investment ratios (funding assistance rates)” (Attachment A). The Consultation document was released in mid June 2011 and responses need to be submitted by 21 July 2011. NZTA part fund many of the transport activities that are carried by Auckland Transport (AT). The amount of subsidy provided by NZTA varies according to priority that NZTA and the Ministry of Transport gives to a particular activity in accordance with the GPS. The GPS will have three priority focus areas: Funding Assistance Rates Page 7 Transport Committee 5 July 2011 • A strong and continuing focus on economic growth and productivity; • Value for money; and • Road safety. The proposed changes Item 12 The proposed FAR changes will take effect from 1 July 2012. Table 1 below sets out the proposed changes to the FAR. Table 1: Proposed changes to the Financial Assistance Rates to take effect from 1 July 2012 Proposed Work category Current FAR NZTA stated reason for the proposed change FAR Passenger 50% To remove the NLTP investment stimulus given to transport facilities operations and (gradually public transport infrastructure. This change will align maintenance phased in over the FAR for these categories with those of bus, ferry 60% 10 years and rail passenger services. starting with 59% from 1 July 2012) Public transport 60% 50% Infrastructure Regional land transport planning 0.15% of the Removed To align with the directions signaled in the GPS 2012 management (RLTP) engagement document to improve efficiencies in the (grant to regional councils) transport planning activity class.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Auckland Regional Transport Authority
    THE JOURNEY Auckland Regional Transport Authority Annual Report 2009 ARTA ANNUAL REPORT 2009 – THE JOURNEY THE JOURNEY 1973 “Robbie’s rapid rail”, electrified rail and underground CBD rail loop proposed by Mayor Dove-Meyer Robinson 1976 Plans cancelled 1993 Government sells NZ Railways to private operator 1993-2000 TranzRail underinvests in Auckland rail system 1995 Auckland Bus Priorities Initiative launched 1996 Link bus service introduced in CBD 1998 First dedicated bus lanes in Sandringham and New North roads 1999 Disused Auckland Railway Station converted to flats 2000 Government and ARC buy back Auckland rail assets from TranzRail 2003 Britomart Station opens, first refurbished trains in service 2004 Connex (Veolia) contracted to run rail services, ARTA is formed to implement the Auckland Regional Land Transport Strategy 2004 North Western Cycleway opened, double tracking of the Western Line begins (Project Boston) 2006 Upgrade of Spaghetti Junction motorway corridor complete 2007 The first integrated Auckland Transport Plan 2008 Northern Busway opens, 40% tertiary discount fares introduced, SuperGold Card introduced for free senior travel, free public transport integrated into events and leisure tickets 2009 Highest patronage of public transport since 1985 with rail up 97% in past five years, 21 rail stations upgraded, customer satisfaction with public transport reaches 84%, SH20 extension opens, real time bus information at high priority stops 2010 New stations due to open at Newmarket and New Lynn, Kingsland Station upgraded,
    [Show full text]
  • 65 YEARS of PRESTRESSING CONCRETE in NEW ZEALAND BRIDGES JAMIL KHAN1, GEOFF BROWN2 1Technical Director
    65 YEARS OF PRESTRESSING CONCRETE IN NEW ZEALAND BRIDGES JAMIL KHAN1, GEOFF BROWN2 1Technical Director - Structural Engineering, Beca Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand 2Senior Technical Director - Structural Engineering, Beca Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand SUMMARY Prestressing has played an important role in extending the span capability and economy of concrete bridges. The history of bridge construction in New Zealand has proved that prestressed concrete is an excellent material for constructing bridges and Kiwi engineers made considerable early use of prestressed concrete in bridge construction. Kiwi engineers love new ideas and embrace new technologies. New Zealand bridge engineers, from the early days, were not afraid to take on the challenge of working with new and innovative materials. INTRODUCTION Prestressed Concrete is one of the most cost effective and durable construction materials and can provide many advantages over other materials. Originating in France, prestressing in bridge construction was introduced in early 1950’s. In the United Kingdom, the first major prestressed concrete road bridge was the replacement for Northam Bridge[24], Southampton in 1954. Walnut Lane Bridge in Philadelphia completed in late 1950, is considered the first prestressed concrete bridge in the USA[25]. It is remarkable that New Zealand, as a remote country at the end of the world, made considerable early use of prestressed concrete in bridge construction. IPENZ’s records indicate that in 1954 the Hutt Estuary Bridge[18] used post-tensioned prestressed concrete for the first time in New Zealand. Upper Hutt City Council also claims their Bridge Road Bridge B8/1, built in 1954 over the Akatarawa River, was the first prestressed bridge in New Zealand[17].
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel
    BEFORE THE AUCKLAND UNITARY PLAN INDEPENDENT HEARINGS PANEL IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 AND IN THE MATTER of TOPIC 081d Rezoning and Precincts (Geographical Areas) AND IN THE MATTER of the submissions and further submissions set out in the Parties and Issues Report STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF ERYN JAMES SHIELDS ON BEHALF OF AUCKLAND COUNCIL WEST SUB-REGIONAL OVERVIEW 26 JANUARY 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 2 PART A – OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 3 2. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3 3. CODE OF CONDUCT ..................................................................................................... 3 4. SCOPE ............................................................................................................................ 3 5. STATUTORY AND POLICY FRAMEWORK ................................................................... 4 6. RELEVANT PLANNING DOCUMENTS .......................................................................... 4 PART B - SUB REGIONAL OVERVIEW ................................................................................ 7 7. DESCRIPTION OF WEST AUCKLAND .......................................................................... 7 8. STRATEGIC
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Transport Agency Additional Waitemata
    Attachment A New Zealand Transport Agency Additional Waitemata Harbour Crossing Preliminary Business Case Restrictions of this report This report has been prepared by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER) for the NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) solely for the purposes stated herein and should not be relied upon for any other purpose. We accept no liability to any party should it be used for any purpose other than that for which it was prepared. This Report is strictly confidential and (save to the extent required by applicable law and/or regulation) must not be released to any third party without our express written consent which is at our sole discretion. To the fullest extent permitted by law, PwC accepts no duty of care to any third party in connection with the provision of this Report and/or any related information or explanation (together, the “Information”). Accordingly, regardless of the form of action, whether in contract, tort (including without limitation, negligence) or otherwise, and to the extent permitted by applicable law, PwC accepts no liability of any kind to any third party and disclaims all responsibility for the consequences of any third party acting or refraining to act in reliance on the Information. We have not independently verified the accuracy of information provided to us, and have not conducted any form of audit in respect of NZTA. Accordingly, we express no opinion on the reliability, accuracy, or completeness of the information provided to us and upon which we have relied. The statements and opinions expressed herein have been made in good faith, and on the basis that all information relied upon is true and accurate in all material respects, and not misleading by reason of omission or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Region Housing Market Assessment
    Auckland Region Housing Market Assessment PREPARED BY Darroch Limited FOR THE Centre for Housing Research, Aotearoa New Zealand NOVEMBER 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was produced for the Centre for Housing Research, Aotearoa New Zealand (CHRANZ), and co-funded by the Auckland Regional Council. The CHRANZ Board gratefully acknowledges the financial and other support provided by Housing New Zealand Corporation. DISCLAIMER The opinions in this report reflect the view of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the CHRANZ Board or the funding organisations. No liability is accepted by the CHRANZ Board or the Auckland Regional Council for the accuracy or omission of any statement, advice or information in this research report and for any commercial, investment or other decisions made upon the reliability of this research report. Auckland Region Housing Market Assessment Volume 1: Main Report For Centre for Housing Research Aotearoa New Zealand By Darroch Limited (August 2010) Table of contents 1.0 Executive Summary 7 2.0 Project and Report Overview 20 2.1 Introduction 20 2.2 Project Aims 20 2.3 Housing Market Assessment Methodology 21 2.4 Auckland Housing Market Assessment Objectives 26 2.5 Housing Market Assessment – Key Terms 26 2.6 Housing Market Area Definition 29 2.7 Summary of Research Data 31 2.8 Report Structure 32 3.0 Auckland Profile and Housing Market Overview 33 3.1 Introduction 33 3.2 Demographic Profile 33 3.3 Economic Structure, Trends and Forecasts 37 3.4 Auckland Housing Market – Framework for Analysis 41 3.5
    [Show full text]
  • History of Concrete Bridges in New Zealand
    HISTORY OF CONCRETE BRIDGES IN NEW ZEALAND JAMIL KHAN1, GEOFF BROWN2 1 Senior Associate, Beca Ltd 2 Technical Director, Beca Ltd SUMMARY Concrete is one of the most cost effective, durable and aesthetic construction materials and can provide many advantages over other materials. The history of bridge construction in New Zealand has proved that concrete is an excellent material for constructing bridges, and in particular bridges that use beams, columns and arches as the main load bearing elements. It is remarkable that New Zealand, as a remote country at the end of the Victorian period, made considerable early use of concrete in bridge construction. Kiwi engineers love new ideas and embrace new technologies. New Zealand bridge engineers, from the early days, were not afraid to take on the challenge of working with a new and innovative material. The first reinforced concrete bridge was built over the Waters of Leith in Dunedin in 1903. In 1910 the Grafton Bridge in Auckland became the world’s longest reinforced concrete arch bridge, 21 years later the Kelburn Viaduct was built in Wellington. Taranaki was especially forward-looking in using concrete arch bridges and has many fine examples. In 1954 another major development occurred when the Hutt Estuary Bridge used post-tensioned pre-stressed concrete for the first time in New Zealand. This led to the construction of New Zealand’s first pre-stressed concrete box girder bridge on the Wanganui Motorway in 1962. Pre-stressed concrete made slim and elegant construction possible, like the 1987 Hāpuawhenua Viaduct on the North Island Main Trunk railway line.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Transport Effects (Including Walking & Cycling And
    Choose a building block. Northern Corridor Improvements Assessment of Transport Effects Project No: 250310 Document Ref: NCI-3PRE-2ENV-RPT-0031 Revision: 2 2 December 2016 This report has been prepared for the benefit of the NZ Transport Agency. No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval or to fulfil a legal requirement. Quality Assurance Statement Prepared by: Ian Clark – Director (Flow Transportation Specialists) Reviewed by: Terry Church – Senior Associate (Flow Transportation Specialists) NZTA Reviewer: Graeme O’Connell, Andrew Mein Approved for issue by Aurecon: Jon Hind Approved for use by NZTA: Deepak Rama Document No. NCI-3PRE-2ENV-RPT-0031 Project No. 250310 Executive summary The need for the Project On completion of the Waterview project in 2017, the Western Ring Route will have been completed to a motorway standard from its southern extent in Manukau to Albany Highway on the North Shore, with the State Highway 18 (SH18) to State Highway 1 (SH1) connection being the final incomplete section. As a result, the Northern Motorway Upper Harbour interchange, and the adjacent sections of SH1 and SH18, have been identified as critical sections of Auckland’s motorway network. These sections of State highway currently operate with significant congestion, and this congestion is predicted to worsen following the completion of the Western Ring Route, and as a result of growth in population and employment anticipated for Albany (including the surrounding areas) and areas further north.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Processes Report
    REPORT Northern Interceptor Coastal Processes Report Prepared for: Watercare Services Ltd July 2015 Job No: 28773.330 105 Carlton Gore Road, Newmarket, Auckland 1023 | p. +64 9 355 6000 | www.tonkin.co.nz Distribution: Watercare Services Ltd 2 copies + PDF Tonkin & Taylor Ltd (FILE) 1 copy Table of contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Proposed works 2 3 Environmental baseline 3 3.1 General setting 3 3.2 Site description 3 3.3 Bathymetry 4 3.4 Sedimentation trends 5 3.5 Sediments 6 3.6 Suspended sediment concentrations 11 3.7 Water levels 12 3.8 Currents 12 3.9 Winds 18 3.10 Waves 18 3.11 Coastal processes 19 3.12 Climate change and sea level rise 20 4 Description of activity in CMA 22 4.1 Construction approach 22 4.1.1 Upper Waitemata Harbour crossing 22 4.1.2 Horizontal directional drilling 22 4.1.3 Marine trenching 22 4.1.4 Te Wharau Creek 26 5 Assessment of effects 27 5.1 Potential effects 27 5.1.1 Subtidal trenching across tidal channel 27 5.1.2 Short term effects of intertidal and transition area trenching 31 5.1.3 Te Wharau Creek 32 5.2 Long term effects of marine trenching 32 5.3 Summary 34 6 Recommended mitigation and management measures 35 7 Applicability 36 Appendix A : Bibliography/references Appendix B : Hydrodynamic Model Study Appendix C : Historic charts and oblique photographs Appendix D : Historic aerials and satellite images Tonkin & Taylor Ltd July 2015 Northern Interceptor Coastal Processes Report Job No: 28773.330 Watercare Services Ltd Executive summary Tonkin and Taylor Ltd (T&T) has been commissioned by Watercare Services Limited (Watercare) to assess the potential coastal process effects related to the construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed Northern Interceptor.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Requirement. Northern Interceptor
    Appendix A Assessment of Alternatives Appendix G Private Properties directly affected by the Designation Assessment of Alternatives Northern Interceptor Wastewater Project 2016 WINNER SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING AWARDS Northern Interceptor: Assessment of Alternatives This document has been prepared for the benefit of Watercare Services Limited. No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to Auckland Council and other persons for an application for permission or approval to fulfil a legal requirement. QUALITY STATEMENT PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT TECHNICAL LEAD Chris van der Boom Chris Povey PREPARED BY Chris Povey, Megan Couture, Jay Burgess … ……………………………............... 17/06/2016 CHECKED BY Garrett Hall ………………………………............... 17/06/2016 REVIEWED BY Chris Scrafton, Jim Bradley (part of) ………………………………............... 17/06/2016 APPROVED FOR ISSUE BY Chris van der Boom …… …………………………............... 17/06/2016 AUCKLAND MWH House Level 3, 111 Carlton Gore Road, Newmarket, Auckland 1023 PO Box 9176, Newmarket, Auckland 1149 TEL +64 9 580 4500, FAX +64 9 580 7600 REVISION SCHEDULE Signature or Typed Name (documentation on file). Rev Date Description No Prepared by Checked by Reviewed by Approved by 1 Feb 19 Draft for Client review CP, MC, GH CS, JB CvdB 2016 JB 2 April 19 Final Draft CP, MC, GH CS, JB CvdB 2016 JB 3 Oct 5 Final MC CS CS CvdB 2016 Status: Final Draft Project No.: 80502292 April 2016 Northern Interceptor: Assessment of Alternatives Watercare Services Limited Northern Interceptor - Assessment of Alternatives CONTENTS 1 Introduction and Project Background.................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Greenhithe Bridge Watermain Duplication and Causeway Project: Heritage Impact Assessment
    GREENHITHE BRIDGE WATERMAIN DUPLICATION AND CAUSEWAY PROJECT: HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Report prepared for Watercare Services Ltd By Charlotte Judge (MA Hons) Rod Clough (PhD) March 2015 Clough & Associates Ltd. [email protected] 321 Forest Hill Rd, Waiatarua AUCKLAND 0612 Telephone: (09) 8141946 Mobile 0274 850 059 www.clough.co.nz TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Proposed Works ................................................................................................................ 2 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 3 Historical Background .......................................................................................................... 6 Pre-European Maori History ............................................................................................. 6 Early Hobsonville ............................................................................................................. 7 Development of the Hobsonville Airbase ......................................................................... 9 Early Greenhithe ............................................................................................................. 15 Construction of Greenhithe Bridge ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Transport Agency
    Draft Auckland Unitary Plan - March 2013 Part 7 Designations» New Zealand Transport Agency Designation Schedule ­ New Zealand Transport Agency Number Description Location 6700 State Highway 1 State Highway 1 from south of Quarry Road, Drury to Bombay Road, Bombay 6701 State Highway 1 State Highway 1 from Bombay Road to Mill Road, Bombay 6702 State Highway 1 State Highway 1 from Mill Road to south of Beaver Road East (Waikato District Council boundary), Bombay 6703 State Highway 1 State Highway 1: Great South Road on­ramp, Bombay 6704 State Highway 22 (Karaka Road State Highway 22 (Karaka Road and Paerata Road) from east of and Paerata Road) Woodlyn Drive, Karaka to Adams Drive, Pukekohe 6705 State Highway 22 ­ road widening State Highway 22 (Karaka Road and Paerata Road) from Woodlyn Drive, Karaka to Adams Drive, Pukekohe 6706 State Highway 1 State Highway 1 from north of Great South Road, Takanini to south of Quarry Road, Drury 6707 State Highway 22 State Highway 22 (Karaka Road and Great South Road) from east of Woodlyn Road, Karaka to State Highway 1, Takanini 6708 State Highway 20 State Highway 20 from Tararata Creek to Massey Road, Mangere 6709 State Highway 20 State Highway 20 from Manukau Harbour Crossing to Tararata Creek, Mangere 6710 State Highway 20 Waterfront Road Reserve, Coronation Road, Rimu Road and Mahunga Drive, Mangere 6711 State Highway 20 State Highway 20 (Manukau Station Road, Wiri Station Road and Roscommon Road) from State Highway 1, Manukau City Centre to Cavendish Drive, Wiri 6712 State Highway 20A State Highway
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Strategy 2005 Which Apply to Local the Council Will Encourage Growth That Provides Local Authorities
    Section 5: Policies and Transport Programme This section outlines the Council’s transport policies and are integrated. Appropriate provision of transport modes transport programme for Waitakere. and mitigation of adverse effects on the transport system need to be considered in order to achieve sustainable Transport policies outcomes for the city. There are a number of policies in the Auckland Regional Supporting economic development Land Transport Strategy 2005 which apply to local The Council will encourage growth that provides local authorities. These form an important part of transport policy jobs, leisure and shopping facilities and concentrates in Waitakere and are outlined in Appendix 3. housing and employment in areas with good passenger Waitakere City Council policies also refl ect its eco city transport and walk and cycle routes. The effi ciency of the approach and the local requirements of Waitakere, existing road network will be improved and some new road including: connections will be provided to address congestion which directly and signifi cantly affects economic development in • The Council’s District Plan. Waitakere. • The Council’s proposed District Plan changes, including It is essential that growth in the local economy can be developments in the northwest of the city and New supported by the local transport network, with appropriate Lynn. routes for trucks and goods vehicles. New developments • Policies contained in strategic and implementation that generate substantial freight movements should be documents (refer to Appendix 4). located with access to the state highway network and away • Existing and planned transport corridors and modes of from town centres and residential areas. A civilian airport transport (outlined in section 6.) at Whenuapai, with appropriate transport connections, would provide signifi cant local employment and achieves Specifi c transport policies for Waitakere include: signifi cant congestion relief.
    [Show full text]