DOCSLIB.ORG

The Free Economy and the Strong State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Free Economy and the Strong State E EE ECOOMY A E SOG SAE: E ISE O E SOCIA MAKE ECOOMY. Andr Gbl I rn th lt tn r th ln ptr prd f xpnn nd tblt h t n nd. W r lvn thrh r tht hld nvr hv hppnd, th r tht Knn thn nd l drt pl nd ntttn r ppd t hv bnhd fr vr, b th hd vr th tndn f th ptlt n trd dfnt dnd nd ndrn ptn. lp n nthn pprhn th l f th 0 h rrd, nd th pttrn f n prfrn h bn vrd, bt th vrll ldn n rt f n rth h tll bn rd. hr h bn dptd r f prftblt rfltd bth n dlnn hrt rn rt f rtrn nd fll n ln tr pprtnt fr nvtnt. rrr t frthr rpd ltn hv ltpld nd dtrnd th rnd n hh jr nflt hv rptd—trl vr p, n thnl nd plnt trl vr th z nd ptn f pbl xpndtr nd trl vr trd nd fnnl bln btn rpl nd dft tt. h t trn ftr f th n rn hh dvd t hrpl fr th lt rt r n th rld n th bhvr f th pr lvl. Unplnt h bn rn tdl, bt t h bn nfltn tht h rptdl thrtnd t t t f ntrl, nd n th f f hh n pl r hv pprd t prl. Infltn n trn ntrbtr t th ntblt n th fnnl rt, th bln n trd, nd t th fl r f th tt nd h l dn h t ndrn th pltl hn f th jr tt. Wth th prd f nrtnt nd ntblt t hrdl rprn tht th rpttn f vrnnt fr fl n nnt h rpdl nd nd tht pltn, hvn bnftd drn th ln r f b fr th dntftn f n prprt th 1 2 E SOCIAIS EGISE 1979 vrnnt n pl, n ffr fr th dntftn f th pl th th dl n f r nd flr vr hh th hv t prd. In rtn hr th prbl f rltv n dln h bn rvtd b th pt f th rn, n vrnnt h n rltn ftr rvn fll tr n , nd thr h bn nfnt dln n pprt fr bth jr prt (t ntbl n 4 bt tll rd n . h ldn n th p f ltn h prvdd th pprtnt fr dprd rjtn f Knn pltl n nd n nlht n th pl, vl nd rnztn f l dr. hr h l bn n lnt n rth ntlltl hh h nvr rrd h ndnt t jn lltv tpd t th rht. W r ntntl bn tld tht ntlltl r fnll ln fth n l (th fll thr prv fnl rjtn f t n th rl 0. h hv bn nvrtd, vn t th lt hr, t th nd t rt ttltrn nd th rth br rt, nd t rjt th blf n lltv nd lt tht r nhrnd n th pl nd ntttn tblhd n th 40.1 Ad fr th n h hv hnd thr nd, d b th pplt lr f th n rht, thr h l bn n rnt r rl ntlltl hn, rrbl rvvl f lbrl pltl n thrh th lbrtn f th dtrn f th l rt n, dtrn hh, ndr dffrnt lbl, h d nrn hd thn th Cnrvtv prt n th lt tn r. h Cnrvtv Gvrnnt ltd n hd rp f ntr n th rl n ntr (rr, Indtr, rd, Enr, h r ll dhrnt f th dtrn nd prprd t vrn n rdn th t prrptn. 2 h tr l rt n rntd n Grn fr th nlbrl d tht r rrnt thr ftr 4. 3 In rtn nd Ar lr d hv bn pt frrd b nbr f thrt nldn .A. nd Mltn rdn, nd pplrzd n rtn b rnztn l th Inttt fr En Affr nd th Cntr fr l Std, 4 b ldr rtr n th Times nd Daily Telegraph: b n nttr h tr , Sl rttn, nd tr tbr, 5 nd b Cnrvtv pltn (Enh ll t frt r rntl, Kth ph. Althh n f th ntlltl prnnt n th brd E EE ECOOMY A E SOG SAE 3 tndn, (ftn lblld, rthr nrtl, ntrt, l t i n thlv rnt tdr brn ln nt th frdbl ll f th Knn n nd pltl Etblhnt, th th hh th hv pntrtd th tdl nd th pd th hh th Knn dfn hv rbld n th pt f r, t thr. At n thr t th jtn btn ntrt nd Knn ld prbbl hv rnd thnl dbt bt th bt ntrnt fr n nnt. t th ntrt hv nt bn ntnt t rv pl fr thlv thn Knn, bt hv lnhd brd lt n th pltl fr tht ndrpn Knn, th fr nd rnztn f l dr. S ntr nd n lbrl hv b lnd th thr d nd vnt, th t nfnt f hh th pplt rht n th Cnrvtv rt, t vrl rprntd b rp h th Mnd Clb nd th tnl Atn fr rd, hh r trnl rtl f trnd n rth t n th r nd r ll dntfd th th blf nd tttd f th prnt Cnrvtv dr. h pplt lt n l dr h nntrtd pn th brdn f txtn, th b f lfr, th nffn f pbl prvn nd pbl ntrpr, nd th thrt t pbl rdr nd llbn pd b rnt, nn, tdnt, nd thr nrt rp. 6 A b ttpt h bn d t ppl t tht tn f th rnl ltrt fr h th pl nd rnztn f l dr hv b nrnl npplr. h lf ntrtnd b th n dl f th rht nd th bnd f vfr nvrt nd rvn pn fr n nt tht nrt th th, tht rtn, hvn jt pd thrh t trhd ltn, bt t xprn rnn f lbrt nd th lbrl t, th rtn f n ntnl nn b n f hh th hn f lltv ll b thrn ff, th trnd f th pt thrt r rvrd, nd rtn ntnl nd .n frtn rvvd. On th lft t n v f hthr nd th n lbrl pltl n r vdnt. On th n hnd thr th trnl hld blf tht th ndrln trnd n drn ptl trd fr f rprt th th tt ntntl tndn t nr t pr f drtn vr th n. n hthr rrdd pl n dl, vl drn vr th rl dvlpnt f ptl, nd pr d t h vrnt r bld t bhv. brl pltl n n pprprt t th r f pttv ptl 4 E SOCIAIS EGISE 1979 bt n lnr rlvnt t th prbl f npl r rprt ptl. If n ttpt r d t ppl t prnpl h ld rlt th xprn f th th Gvrnnt n t frt t r ftn td. Mn n th lft n t r tht prl dptd th dl f th rht t th prbl f nn drn ptlt n tht ftn th l d rt prt l th br rt r bttr td fr t, nd rtl prfrrd b ptlt thlv t th xpltl ptlt prt. A nd rpn t hthr nd th rvvl f lbrl pltl n t th nt pl dl bt n fr rrnzn th tt tr n prd f rn, nrn pndn n ntnn rdr nd rdn t n rtn nd f lfr. h rlln b f th tt n r n t nvlv rlln t frrd n thr. h r h t b pld ll nd, nd th pl r tv rl fr tt n ( ll r pl rnrtn fr rtfl ppl. Whlt thr h r t b d fr th pnt f v thn fr th frt t n ld t nlt f th p f th rhtn rvvl nd th r f t trnth, b t f n th tt tr nd th blztn f pplt tttd trd lfr, rnt nd tr. t hthr nd lbrl pltl n hld nt b trtd n, hvr iprtnt th ft f thr prnt lnn n prt. brl pltl n h fr dpr rt nd prnn thn ptlt l frtn nd ntrbt d nd prr t th nrvtv lft ll th rht. Evn n f th ntlltl h rrntl dvt l rt n d nt b n n hr th pplt ptn f hthr nd r xtrl nhpp tht ntr nd th l rt n hld ppr rhtn dtrn. 2 On f th n rn h th l rt n h rd rhtn tn b t ftn rrdd ph fr lzfr n, nd b n pltl r n dfnd lft r rht dpndn n hthr th nvlv th xtnn r th rtrt f ntrl vrnnt pr nd rpnblt. h prbl th th tr lzfr tht t t nt r nttntv tt. Cptlt tt hv nvr bn tht. h rl tn th dvdn ln btn th E EE ECOOMY A E SOG SAE 5 r hr th tt fl bld t ntrvn nd th hr t d nt. hr hv l bn l th prttn f prprt nd th nfrblt f ntrt n hh th tt h nvr flld lzfr pl. Whr th dvdn ln h ftn bn dtrnd b pltl nd l trl. h i prtn f th l rt dtrn nt tht t nt ll tt ntrvntn bt tht t nt th tt t ntrvn l n r nd r n thr. r n—trn tt n dl ln, nd r th ntnt f th dtrn th th trdtn f lbrl pltl n, nt dprtr fr t.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chinese Privatization: Between Plan and Market
    CHINESE PRIVATIZATION: BETWEEN PLAN AND MARKET LAN CAO* I INTRODUCTION Since 1978, when China adopted its open-door policy and allowed its economy to be exposed to the international market, it has adhered to what Deng Xiaoping called "socialism with Chinese characteristics."1 As a result, it has produced an economy with one of the most rapid growth rates in the world by steadfastly embarking on a developmental strategy of gradual, market-oriented measures while simultaneously remaining nominally socialistic. As I discuss in this article, this strategy of reformthe mere adoption of a market economy while retaining a socialist ownership baseshould similarly be characterized as "privatization with Chinese characteristics,"2 even though it departs markedly from the more orthodox strategy most commonly associated with the term "privatization," at least as that term has been conventionally understood in the context of emerging market or transitional economies. The Russian experience of privatization, for example, represents the more dominant and more favored approach to privatizationcertainly from the point of view of the West and its advisersand is characterized by immediate privatization of the state sector, including the swift and unequivocal transfer of assets from the publicly owned state enterprises to private hands. On the other hand, "privatization with Chinese characteristics" emphasizes not the immediate privatization of the state sector but rather the retention of the state sector with the Copyright © 2001 by Lan Cao This article is also available at http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/63LCPCao. * Professor of Law, College of William and Mary Marshall-Wythe School of Law. At the time the article was written, the author was Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • "Functional Socialism'' and "Functional Capitalism" : the "Socialist Market Economy" in China
    "Functional Socialism'' and "Functional Capitalism" : The "Socialist Market Economy" in China 著者 Takeshita Koshi journal or Kansai University review of economics publication title volume 18 page range 1-25 year 2016-03 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10112/00017203 Kansai University Review of Economics No.18 (March 2016), pp.1-25 ^Tunctional Socialism'' and ^Tunctional Capitalism — The "Socialist Market Economy" in China — Koshi Takeshita Based on a framework that conceives of ownership (property rights) as "a bundle of rights," We propose four types of ownership system, build concept models of "functional socialism" and "func tional capitalism," and then try to clarify the reality of Chinas "socialist market economy" We reached the following conclusions. First, we schematize the correspondence between "functional socialism" and "functional capi talism." Second, we show that a process of land ownership reform and state-owned enterprises reform corresponded with a schema of "functional capitalism." Third, we found that the ownership structure of the "socialist market economy" in China is now sepa rated into three different sets of rights regarding ownership (prop erty rights). Finally, we show that the reality of the "socialist market economy" is not a free market, but a market controlled by the Communist Party. Keywords: market socialism, state capitalism, property rights approach, land owner ship reform, reform of SOEs (state-owned enterprises) 1. Introduction: analytical viewpoint^^ Following the remarkable rise of Chinas economy, there has been an increase in discussion about the diverse forms that capitalism can take.^^However, when one considers that China calls its own system a "socialist market economy," one may wonder if it is better to think about the multiple forms that socialism can take.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Economics
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Working Paper State Debate Post Chris O’Kane Working Paper 2019-01 State Debate Post Introduction We live in turbulent times. The long decade following the 2007 crisis has been marked by a series of movements. They can be roughly summarized as follows: The Arab Spring, Occupy, and the UK student movement arose in the immediate aftermath of 2007 in opposition to the government bailouts, austerity and persistent economic misery. So did the Tea Party, the Five Star Movement, UKIP, Austria etc. Whilst the former tried to address their grievances outside of representative government, the latter experienced increasing electoral success culminating in the election of figures such as Trump Austria etc. These successes have been met by the ascent of social democratic theory, policy pronouncements, and strategizing in an array of disciplines in tandem with an increased membership in social democratic organizations and some notable electoral victories. The Social Democratic turn Social democracy is certainly better than Trump, Orban, Macron, and May. I would also welcome some of the proposals. However, I contend that these social democratic theories, policies and strategies, much like the other radical theories and practices of the first wave of reaction to the crisis, have not fully considered the question of the state. Whilst the former did not consider the obstacle of the state, today it seems that the state is not considered to be an obstacle. The format of this intervention certainly prevents me from demonstrating this at length. So let me indicate how a few notable theories, public policies proposals, and strategies share a ‘traditional theoretical’ and ‘constructive criticism’ of capitalist political economy that assumes the state is a neutral instrument.
    [Show full text]
  • Social-Property Relations, Class-Conflict and The
    Historical Materialism 19.4 (2011) 129–168 brill.nl/hima Social-Property Relations, Class-Conflict and the Origins of the US Civil War: Towards a New Social Interpretation* Charles Post City University of New York [email protected] Abstract The origins of the US Civil War have long been a central topic of debate among historians, both Marxist and non-Marxist. John Ashworth’s Slavery, Capitalism, and Politics in the Antebellum Republic is a major Marxian contribution to a social interpretation of the US Civil War. However, Ashworth’s claim that the War was the result of sharpening political and ideological – but not social and economic – contradictions and conflicts between slavery and capitalism rests on problematic claims about the rôle of slave-resistance in the dynamics of plantation-slavery, the attitude of Northern manufacturers, artisans, professionals and farmers toward wage-labour, and economic restructuring in the 1840s and 1850s. An alternative social explanation of the US Civil War, rooted in an analysis of the specific path to capitalist social-property relations in the US, locates the War in the growing contradiction between the social requirements of the expanded reproduction of slavery and capitalism in the two decades before the War. Keywords origins of capitalism, US Civil War, bourgeois revolutions, plantation-slavery, agrarian petty- commodity production, independent-household production, merchant-capital, industrial capital The Civil War in the United States has been a major topic of historical debate for almost over 150 years. Three factors have fuelled scholarly fascination with the causes and consequences of the War. First, the Civil War ‘cuts a bloody gash across the whole record’ of ‘the American .
    [Show full text]
  • 1How Do We Compare Economies?
    1 How Do We Compare Economies? As mankind approaches the end of the millennium, the twin crises of authoritarianism and socialist central planning have left only one competitor standing in the ring as an ideology of potentially uni- versal validity: liberal democracy, the doctrine of individual freedom and popular sovereignty. In its economic manifestation, liberalism is the recognition of the right of free economic activity and economic exchange based on private property and markets. —Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man, 1992 INTRODUCTION We have witnessed a profound transformation of the world political and economic order since 1989, the ultimate outcome of which is difficult to foresee. The former Soviet Union (FSU)1 broke up, its empire of satellite states dissolved, and most of the former constituent parts are trying to fulfill Fukyama’s prophecy quoted above. In his view, the end of the Cold War means the convergence of the entire world on the American model of political econ- omy and the end of any significant competition between alternative forms of political or economic systems. Has this prophecy come true? We think not. Certainly during the second half of the 1990s, the economic boom in the United States pushed it forward as a role model that many coun- tries sought and still seek to emulate. But with the outbreak of financial crises in many parts of the globe and the bursting of the American stock market bubble in March 2000, its eco- nomic problems such as continuing poverty and inequality loom large. Furthermore, it is now clear that the problems in the FSU are deeply rooted, with the transitions in various former Soviet republics stalled.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialist Planning
    Socialist Planning Socialist planning played an enormous role in the economic and political history of the twentieth century. Beginning in the USSR it spread round the world. It influenced economic institutions and economic policy in countries as varied as Bulgaria, USA, China, Japan, India, Poland and France. How did it work? What were its weaknesses and strengths? What is its legacy for the twenty-first century? Now in its third edition, this textbook is fully updated to cover the findings of the period since the collapse of the USSR. It provides an overview of socialist planning, explains the underlying theory and its limitations, looks at its implementation in various sectors of the economy, and places developments in their historical context. A new chap- ter analyses how planning worked in the defence–industry complex. This book is an ideal text for undergraduate and graduate students taking courses in comparative economic systems and twentieth-century economic history. michael ellman is Emeritus Professor in the Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands. He is the author, co- author and editor of numerous books and articles on the Soviet and Russian economies, on transition economics, and on Soviet economic and political history. In 1998, he was awarded the Kondratieff prize for his ‘contributions to the development of the social sciences’. Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 128.122.253.212 on Sat Jan 10 18:08:28 GMT 2015. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ebook.jsf?bid=CBO9781139871341 Cambridge Books Online © Cambridge University Press, 2015 Downloaded from Cambridge Books Online by IP 128.122.253.212 on Sat Jan 10 18:08:28 GMT 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Privatisation Education and Commodity Forms
    CHAPTER 25 Privatisation Education and Commodity Forms Glenn Rikowski Introduction Privatisation in education is not essentially about education. It is about the development of capitalism and the deepening of the rule of capital in par- ticular institutions (schools, colleges, universities etc.) in contemporary soci- ety. Of course, this is not how the situation appears in the relevant academic literature. Privatisation in and of education is typically framed within a dis- course regarding whether it ‘works,’ or not; or whether aspects of education— standards, equity and efficiency in particular—are enhanced or threatened by privatisation in educational institutions. Focus on the marketisation of edu- cation is particularly to the fore in writing and research on educational priva- tisation. Finally, and politically significant, is that privatisation is posited as a threat to public, state-financed education. The very ‘publicness’ of education is at issue (Miron, 2008). What remains largely uncovered in these standard academic approaches is the nature of the commodity forms that are worked on, developed and expanded in processes of educational privatisation. This article starts out from these commodity forms in order to set a path for a critique of the privatisation of education that delves deeper than mainstream academic accounts. Starting from commodity forms opens a shaft on the insidious and grubby underworld of capital’s mingling with education: capitalisation, the ‘becoming of capital’ in educational institutions, is uncovered. Current theoretical work on the privatisation of education is inadequate as a starting point for understanding what is at stake in the critique of educational privatisation as capitalist development. As Francine Menashy (2013) indicates, three of the most ‘commonly adopted approaches’ for analysing educational privatisation are the neoclassical-neoliberal, social primary goods, and rights- based approaches (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Socialism As a Distinct Socioeconomic Formation Internal to the Modern Mode of Production
    New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry Vol. 5, No. 2 (May 2012) Pp. 20-50 Market Socialism as a Distinct Socioeconomic Formation Internal to the Modern Mode of Production Alberto Gabriele UNCTAD Francesco Schettino University of Rome ABSTRACT: This paper argues that, during the present historical period, only one mode of production is sustainable, which we call the modern mode of production. Nevertheless, there can be (both in theory and in practice) enough differences among the specific forms of modern mode of production prevailing in different countries to justify the identification of distinct socioeconomic formations, one of them being market socialism. In its present stage of evolution, market socialism in China and Vietnam allows for a rapid development of productive forces, but it is seriously flawed from other points of view. We argue that the development of a radically reformed and improved form of market social- ism is far from being an inevitable historical necessity, but constitutes a theoretically plausible and auspicable possibility. KEYWORDS: Marx, Marxism, Mode of Production, Socioeconomic Formation, Socialism, Communism, China, Vietnam Introduction o our view, the correct interpretation of the the most advanced mode of production, capitalism, presently existing market socialism system (MS) was still prevailing only in a few countries. Yet, Marx Tin China and Vietnam requires a new and partly confidently predicted that, thanks to its intrinsic modified utilization of one of Marx’s fundamental superiority and to its inbuilt tendency towards inces- categories, that of mode of production. According to sant expansion, capitalism would eventually embrace Marx, different Modes of Production (MPs) and dif- the whole world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Way to the Socialist Planned Economy
    The Way to the Socialist Planned Economy Marek Breit and Oskar Lange Translated by Jan Toporowski* Abstract: This is the first English translation of a 1934 article by Marek Breit and Oskar Lange on the economics of socialism. Breit and Lange advocate a form of market socialism based on self-managed workers’ cooperatives, with membership open to all who wish to join. 1 The Breakdown of the Capitalist Economy Otto Bauer said not very long ago that ‘the fall of the second workers’ government in England, the events of recent years, and especially in the current year in Germany, mark the end of an epoch and the start of a new one in the history of the international workers’ movement. We find ourselves at the start of a period of severe, protracted economic crises, broken only by short moments of respite; a period in which the proletariat will rather be convinced of how narrow are the boundaries with which the world capitalist economy limits the possibilities for liberation of the working class, and how these binding constraints may only be removed together with the whole capitalist system.’1 Essentially the world-wide economic crisis, the likes of which the capitalist economy has not experienced since its beginnings, shows the complete bankruptcy of the capitalist economic system. Nothing so demonstrates that complete bankruptcy, the total breakdown of the capitalist economy, as the co-existence of poverty with excess that is met at every step. When the masses of the people in the capitalist economies are oppressed by unprecedented poverty, stores are packed with goods for which there are no buyers; when millions are starving, grain and coffee are sunk at sea or burnt; when millions cannot clothe themselves, spinning and weaving plants stand idle.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialist Political Economy with Chinese Characteristics in a New
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/2516-1652.htm Socialist Socialist political economy with political Chinese characteristics in a economy new era Yinxing Hong 259 Nanjing University, Nanjing, China Received 18 October 2020 Revised 18 October 2020 Abstract Accepted 18 October 2020 Purpose – The socialist political economy with Chinese characteristics reflects the characteristics of ushering into a new era, and the research object thereof shifts to productive forces. Emancipating and developing productive forces and achieving common prosperity become the main theme. Wealth supersedes value as the fundamental category of economic analysis. Design/methodology/approach – The theoretical system of socialist political economy with Chinese characteristics cannot proceed from transcendental theories but is problem-oriented. Leading problems involve development stages and research-level problems. Findings – The economic operation analysis is subject to the goal of optimal allocation of resources with micro-level analysis focused on efficiency and macro-level analysis focused on economic growth and macroeconomic stability also known as economic security. The economic development analysis explores the laws of development and related development concepts in compliance with laws of productive forces. The new development concepts i.e. the innovative coordinated green open and shared development drive the innovation of development theory in political economy. Originality/value – Accordingly, the political economy cannot study the system only, but also needs to study the problems of economic operation and economic development. Therefore, the theoretical system of the political economy tends to encompass three major parts, namely economic system, economic operation and economic development (including foreign economy).
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Anarchism and Authoritarian Populism: Towards a More (State-)Critical ‘Critical Agrarian Studies’
    The Journal of Peasant Studies ISSN: 0306-6150 (Print) 1743-9361 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fjps20 Agrarian anarchism and authoritarian populism: towards a more (state-)critical ‘critical agrarian studies’ Antonio Roman-Alcalá To cite this article: Antonio Roman-Alcalá (2020): Agrarian anarchism and authoritarian populism: towards a more (state-)critical ‘critical agrarian studies’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2020.1755840 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1755840 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 20 May 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3209 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fjps20 THE JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1755840 FORUM ON AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM AND THE RURAL WORLD Agrarian anarchism and authoritarian populism: towards a more (state-)critical ‘critical agrarian studies’* Antonio Roman-Alcalá International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands ABSTRACT KEYWORDS This paper applies an anarchist lens to agrarian politics, seeking to Anarchism; authoritarian expand and enhance inquiry in critical agrarian studies. populism; critical agrarian Anarchism’s relevance to agrarian processes is found in three studies; state theory; social general areas: (1) explicitly anarchist movements, both historical movements; populism; United States of America; and contemporary; (2) theories that emerge from and shape these moral economy movements; and (3) implicit anarchism found in values, ethics, everyday practices, and in forms of social organization – or ‘anarchistic’ elements of human social life.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioural Thatcherism and Nostalgia: Tracing the Everyday Consequences of Holding Thatcherite Values
    This is a repository copy of Behavioural Thatcherism and nostalgia: tracing the everyday consequences of holding Thatcherite values. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/156333/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Farrall, S., Hay, C. orcid.org/0000-0001-6327-6547, Gray, E. et al. (1 more author) (2020) Behavioural Thatcherism and nostalgia: tracing the everyday consequences of holding Thatcherite values. British Politics. ISSN 1746-918X https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-019-00130-7 This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in British Politics. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41293-019- 00130-7. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ ___________________________________________________________________ Behavioural Thatcherism And Nostalgia: Tracing the Behavioural Consequences of holding Thatcherite Values _______________________________________________ Stephen Farrall*ᵻ, Colin Hay**, Emily Gray* and Phil Jones* *Department of Criminology, College of Business, Law and the Social Sciences, University of Derby, UK; ** Centre d’Études Européennes, CNRS, Sciences Po, Paris, France and SPERI, University of Sheffield, UK.
    [Show full text]