UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Social Learning in Massive Open Online Courses: An Analysis of Pedagogical Implications and Students' Learning Experiences Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6qr7p6rq Author Hill, Andrew Jefferson Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Social Learning in Massive Open Online Courses: An Analysis of Pedagogical Implications and Students' Learning Experiences A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education by Andrew Jefferson Hill 2015 Copyright by Andrew Jefferson Hill 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Social Learning in Massive Open Online Courses: An Analysis of Pedagogical Implications and Students' Learning Experiences by Andrew Jefferson Hill Doctor of Education University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Robert A. Rhoads, Chair Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are a relatively new form of online education which allow a single instructor to teach tens of thousands of enrolled students from around the world; ostensibly offering free university-level education to anyone connected to the internet. A growing number of MOOC hosts have formed to create digital platforms allowing instructors to design and teach their courses; each offering a different set of tools to convey content, assess student learning, and allow communication in massive virtual classrooms. A new environment suggests that some educators might need to alter pedagogy to address the problem of how to teach a massive virtual population of student learners. Critics often cite a few well-publicized failures and a trend of high rates of attrition as evidence of failure, but educators continue to experiment with the MOOC model of instruction. ii Teaching a MOOC is not only different from traditional university teaching, but also different from earlier attempts to teach at a distance. Perhaps most notably, the massiveness of the MOOC model appears to prevent instructors from addressing individual needs of some learners. MOOCs have provided ways for students to communicate with each other, typically through discussion forums, allowing some to rely on peers to reinforce larger scale instruction. Some students find the sheer volume of information on forums problematic, even with search and sorting tools provided by MOOC platforms. Some MOOC educators have made use of other pedagogical methods which appear to be designed to encourage students to interact with and learn from peers, apparently finding value in social learning. If educators had a better understanding of different pedagogies used to promote social learning, and how students might react to these teaching methods, perhaps MOOC instructors could rely on students to address individualized instruction needs of their peers. Social learning methods seem a perfect fit for MOOCs, offering a way of teaching online students which would not require educators to add resources as enrollment numbers scale into the tens or hundreds of thousands. I engaged in this research project to provide more information to educators about the nature of social learning methods available to MOOC educators, as well as to provide a look into student experiences. To answer the following research questions, I engaged in a two-phase research project: 1. What are the different methods employed in massive open online courses to promote student social learning and peer interaction? 2. What do students report about their experiences with social learning and peer interaction methods used in MOOCs? iii a. To what extent does student motivation to take a course influence students’ reported experiences? 3. What learning outcomes or course-related benefits do students attribute to social learning experiences in MOOC environments? The first phase of the research project addressed the first question. I enrolled in 267 MOOCs from eleven hosts; representing every course I could find and enroll in over a six-month research window. Enrolling in these courses granted me access to course data about how instructors attempted to use social learning methods in their courses. I examined pedagogy and attempted to explain the intentions of educators based on information from course websites. Through this phase of data collection, it became clear that platforms offered a variety of tools, which instructor sometimes used for social learning. I combined tools with how educators appeared to use the tools to define seven categories of social learning methods (Forums, Peer Assessments, Groups, Face-to-Face Meetings, Synchronous Communication, Social Media, and Social Presence). I then placed methods from each category along a spectrum of social learning. Methods on the lowest end of the spectrum seemed to be less likely or less intent on promoting social learning; these methods represented the bulk of social learning findings from phase one. Social learning methods on the highest end of the spectrum were those which educators explicitly used to encourage or even necessitate student interaction to complete course activities. The data from phase one not only illustrated a broad view of social learning methods offered in MOOCs, the findings also guided my selection of sites and interview candidates in the second phase. In the second phase of the research project, I selected courses which appeared to be most intent on promoting social learning. I selected four courses, each on a different platform iv (Coursera, edX, FutureLearn, and NovoEd); each offered different social learning methods, though many used methods in overlapping categories. After briefly studying the first few weeks of content, I selected three or four students from each course who I felt likely to have the most experience with social learning methods: students appeared actively engaged in social learning methods and were nearly finished with their courses. Over the next month, I conducted virtual interviews (via Skype, Google Hangouts, or the phone) with thirteen students about their experiences. I asked questions specifically about how they experienced social learning methods and how different activities influenced their learning or other course-related outcomes. I based questions on specific conjectures of social constructivist learning. Some findings from the second phase of the research project were surprising, most notably the interplay between motivation and social learning methods. I had expected students to report having strong reasons for taking the course, perhaps partially explaining why they would be active and nearly finished with their courses. I did not expect six of the thirteen students to report finding motivation from social connections they felt with other students in the course. Most frequently, students reported experiencing closeness from relationships made with other students working in small groups, which sometimes used synchronous communication and face- to-face meetings. Students tended to cite smaller scale and more synchronous communication as the source of social connections, but at least one student felt a kind of connection with the class through large discussion forums, perhaps because of the course content. Forums, which most tended to describe as large and less personal than other social learning methods, did not appear to result in personal social connections. Students did report forums to be a useful means of communication and experienced improved learning outcomes, even without an available search tool. While forums appeared to be a viable means of v exchanging information, students tended to report richer experiences when using smaller scale social learning methods; with the exception of anonymous peer assessments. The other methods discussed by students at a smaller scale (groups, synchronous communication, and face-to-face meetings) appeared to be much more likely to affect students’ ability to connect with peers socially and often led to notable increases in student learning. Learning itself appeared to be difficult for some students explain. Students tended to describe positive outcomes from social learning experiences in terms of understanding other students’ experiences or opinions. Yet, most did not define these experiences as learning; a word that most reserved for formal course materials, even from students who described finding value in social learning and peer interaction. The apparent absence of some students’ ability to recognize social learning outcomes, together with a lack of explanation of many social learning methods by educators, suggested a few ways educators might improve social learning in MOOCs. The findings suggest that even students stating an awareness of the value of social learning may lack an understanding of what outcomes they can expect. There may be many students who would benefit from an increased understanding of social learning: how to use different methods, and what benefits they might find. Additionally, while all MOOC platforms appeared to offer tools which instructors could offer to promote social learning, and many educators used them, few offered explanations or models of how students might learn from peers in their courses. A good first step, and something relatively easy to accomplish, might be to increase student awareness of social learning, and instruct students on how and why to use social learning methods in MOOCs. If such knowledge became widespread,
Recommended publications
  • Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Different Leadership Practices and Organizational, Teaming, Leader, and Employee Outcomes*
    Journal of International Education and Leadership Volume 8 Issue 2 Fall 2018 http://www.jielusa.org/ ISSN: 2161-7252 Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Different Leadership Practices and Organizational, Teaming, Leader, and Employee Outcomes* Carl J. Dunst Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute Mary Beth Bruder University of Connecticut Health Center Deborah W. Hamby, Robin Howse, and Helen Wilkie Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute * This study was supported, in part, by funding from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (No. 325B120004) for the Early Childhood Personnel Center, University of Connecticut Health Center. The contents and opinions expressed, however, are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policy or official position of either the Department or Office and no endorsement should be inferred or implied. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The meta-analysis described in this paper evaluated the relationships between 11 types of leadership practices and 7 organizational, teaming, leader, and employee outcomes. A main focus of analysis was whether the leadership practices were differentially related to the study outcomes. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the correlations between leadership subscale measures (rather than global measures of leadership) and outcomes of interest were reported. The random effects weighted average correlations between the independent and dependent measures were used as the sizes of effects for evaluating the influences of the leadership practices on the outcome measures. One hundred and twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and included 39,433 participants. The studies were conducted in 31 countries in different kinds of programs, organizations, companies, and businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Serious Educational Game Assessment
    Serious Educational Game Assessment Serious Educational Game Assessment Serious Educational Practical Methods and Models for Educational Games, Simulations and Virtual Worlds Game Assessment Leonard Annetta George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA Practical Methods and Models for and Educational Games, Simulations and Stephen Bronack (Eds.) Virtual Worlds Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA In an increasingly scientifi c and technological world the need for a knowledgeable citizenry, individuals who understand the fundamentals of technological ideas and think Leonard Annetta and Stephen Bronack (Eds.) critically about these issues, has never been greater. There is growing appreciation across the broader education community that educational three dimensional virtual learning environments are part of the daily lives of citizens, not only regularly occurring in schools and in after-school programs, but also in informal settings like museums, science centers, zoos and aquariums, at home with family, in the workplace, during leisure time when children and adults participate in community-based activities. This blurring of the boundaries of where, when, why, how and with whom people learn, along with better understandings of learning as a personally constructed, life-long process of making meaning and shaping identity, has initiated a growing awareness in the fi eld that the questions and frameworks guiding assessing these environments (Eds.) Bronack Stephen and Annetta Leonard should be reconsidered in light of these new realities. The audience for this book will be researchers working in the Serious Games arena along with distance education instructors and administrators and students on the cutting edge of assessment in computer generated environments. S e n s e P u b l i s h e r s DIVS SensePublishers Serious Educational Game Assessment Serious Educational Game Assessment Practical Methods and Models for Educational Games, Simulations and Virtual Worlds Edited by Leonard Annetta George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA Stephen C.
    [Show full text]
  • Acrobat File for August 2010 Journal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND DISTANCE LEARNING August 2010 Volume 7 Number 8 Editorial Board Donald G. Perrin Ph.D. Executive Editor Elizabeth Perrin Ph.D. Editor-in-Chief Brent Muirhead Ph.D. Senior Editor Muhammad Betz, Ph.D. Editor ISSN 1550-6908 International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning PUBLISHER'S DECLARATION Research and innovation in teaching and learning are prime topics for the Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (ISSN 1550-6908). The Journal was initiated in January 2004 to facilitate communication and collaboration among researchers, innovators, practitioners, and administrators of education and training involving innovative technologies and/or distance learning. The Journal is monthly, refereed, and global. Intellectual property rights are retained by the author(s) and a Creative Commons Copyright permits replication of articles and eBooks for education related purposes. Publication is managed by DonEl Learning Inc. supported by a host of volunteer editors, referees and production staff that cross national boundaries. IJITDL is committed to publish significant writings of high academic stature for worldwide distribution to stakeholders in distance learning and technology. In its first six years, the Journal logged over six million page views and more than one million downloads of Acrobat files of monthly journals and eBooks. Donald G. Perrin, Executive Editor Elizabeth Perrin, Editor in Chief Brent Muirhead, Senior Editor Muhammad Betz, Editor August 2010 ii Vol. 7. No. 8. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning Vol. 7. No. 8. ISSN 1550-6908 Table of Contents – August 2010 Page 1 Editorial: The Problem is the Solution Donald G.
    [Show full text]
  • (LMS) and Social Media in Higher Education
    Intelligent Environments 2018 389 I. Chatzigiannakis et al. (Eds.) © 2018 The authors and IOS Press. This article is published online with Open Access by IOS Press and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0). doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-874-7-389 Learning Management Systems (LMS) and Social Media in Higher Education Danielle Ferretti, Minjuan Wang, Nicole M. Konicke, and Elizabeth Li Learning Design and Technology School of Journalism and Media Studies San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA [email protected], [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. This paper provides a systematic and comprehensive review of social media use in higher education. We reviewed and synthesized relevant studies in the following 5 topics: 1) features of current LMS, 2) LMS gaps and criticisms, 3) social media learning theories, 4) instructional use of social media, and 5) alternative methods of using LMS. Our review reveals that many researchers have investigated these topics and proposed varying methods to integrate social media into teaching and learning. We also present opportunities for future research, including analyzing big data to draw more accurate conclusions on social media needs and usage in higher educational settings. Keywords. Social Media, Learning Systems, Instructional Design, Personal Learning Environment, Big Data Analysis 1. Introduction Studies conducted in Western countries have indicated that 93% of millennials spend time online [1], 99% of college students use Facebook [2], and 80% of faculty members use social media [3]. In addition, over half of the faculty members reported that they use social media within their teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Miteamfor Education Transformation Scan QR for Demo
    Digital Any Place, Tools User Digital Any Device Notifications Management Learning Customiza- tions Project Live Video Document Collaboration Webcast Management On-premise Cloud Security Content Event installation Library Management Digital MiTeamfor Education transformation Scan QR for demo https://miteam.eu Learner in the Focus Social Learning Learning Experience Platform Powerful collaboration and communications tools The future of learning is with a learner in charge. The While learners will be more and more often on learner will access a wealth of content, community different locations, social learning is becoming a members and tools any time, from anywhere and crucial tool to stimulate more creativity, action, from any device. He will experience intuitive, fully team-oriented working habits and more. Creation personalized, smart, interactive, multimedia-rich of distributed learning teams is becoming a must. learning environment. MiTeam excels with an unseen level of integration of digital learning and collaboration to make efficient MiTeam Learning Experience Platform provides a distributed learning teams possible. unique and friendly learner-centric place, where learners, teachers, parents and other stakeholders will Advanced video conferencing and interactive build there customized virtual spaces, access a wealth webinars are always one click away. Virtual of curated content coming from different sources. classrooms, meeting rooms, breakout rooms, town Smart notification engine will inform users about halls, all with
    [Show full text]
  • A Smart E-Learning System for Social Networking
    International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) Vol. 4, No. 3, June 2014, pp. 447~455 ISSN: 2088-8708 447 A Smart E-Learning System for Social Networking M.R.M. Veeramanickam*, N. Radhika** *Department of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Karpagam University **Department of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Article Info ABSTRACT Article history: With the development of Cloud Computing, the popularity of E learning, the increasing of social networking services, Smart Cloud E-Learning System Received Feb 7, 2014 with Social Networking has become a research topic. The characteristics of E Revised Apr 3, 2014 learning and requirements of Social networking services in environments Accepted Apr 24, 2014 raise a challenge on building an Architecture and Implementation quite strong. In this paper, we elaborate a Smart Cloud E-Learning System with Social Networking based on architecture level of social networking and E Keyword: learning cloud system to support E learning interactions in worldwide environments. A prototype of Cloud E-Learning System with Social E-Learning Networking is developed on cloud, and several applications features are Social Interaction described based on the proposed architecture to demonstrate the effectiveness Social Learning of the architecture. Social Networking Copyright © 2014 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved. Corresponding Author: N. Radhika, Department of Computer Sciences and Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Ettimadai, Coimbatore, INDIA. Email: [email protected] 1. INTRODUCTION The development of Cloud Computing and E learning technology, smart learning system can be build to benefit the students and faculty, by using the university and college resources and enhance learning system with proactive services.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Educational Research Literacy in Higher Education
    Groß Ophoff, Jana; Wolf, Raffaela; Schladitz, Sandra; Wirtz, Markus Assessment of educational research literacy in higher education: Construct validation of the factorial structure of an assessment instrument comparing different treatments of omitted responses Journal for educational research online 9 (2017) 2, S. 37-68 Empfohlene Zitierung/ Suggested Citation: Groß Ophoff, Jana; Wolf, Raffaela; Schladitz, Sandra; Wirtz, Markus: Assessment of educational research literacy in higher education: Construct validation of the factorial structure of an assessment instrument comparing different treatments of omitted responses - In: Journal for educational research online 9 (2017) 2, S. 37-68 - URN: urn:nbn:de:0111-pedocs-148962 in Kooperation mit / in cooperation with: http://www.waxmann.com Nutzungsbedingungen Terms of use Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, persönliches und We grant a non-exclusive, non-transferable, individual and limited right to beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist using this document. ausschließlich für den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. This document is solely intended for your personal, non-commercial use. Use Die Nutzung stellt keine Übertragung des Eigentumsrechts an diesem of this document does not include any transfer of property rights and it is Dokument dar und gilt vorbehaltlich der folgenden Einschränkungen: Auf conditional to the following limitations: All of the copies of this documents must sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle
    [Show full text]
  • OIT Annual Satisfaction Survey Results for 2021
    1 OIT Annual Satisfaction Survey Results for 2021 OIT used questions developed for The Higher Education TechQual+ Project (https://www.techqual.org) to measure satisfaction. The TechQual+ survey instrument consists of 13 items that are designed to measure the performance of three core commitments: • Connectivity and Access (not included) • Technology and Collaboration Services • Support and Training Due to the majority of the year being remote, the Connectivity and Access questions were not included this year. In addition to the core items, 8 additional services that are specific to the campus were included on the survey. • Official University Email - Office365, Gmail • Online@UT (Canvas) • Student Information Systems and Online Class Registration (Banner, DARS, MyUTK, Gradesfirst) • Zoom • Customized help with developing course materials and lectures for online teaching • UT System Services - ANDI • UT System Services - Cayuse SP/424 • UT System Services - IRIS The survey asked the respondents to rate each item on three factors: minimum service level expectation, desired service level expectation and perceived service performance. One of the main goals of TechQual+ is to measure how well OIT is meeting the technology needs of campus by calculating an Adequacy Gap score which is the difference between minimum service level expectation and the perceived service performance. When the Adequacy Gap is positive, perceived (or actual) service performance exceeds minimum expectations. There were 1561 people who responded to the 2021 OIT Satisfaction Survey. The sample consisted of 36.3% students, 19.2% faculty, 44.3% staff and 0.1% who did not indicate their status. The results are presented for the campus overall, as well as each campus affiliation: students, faculty and staff.
    [Show full text]
  • A Team Teaching Concept at the Technische Universität Dortmund
    Philosophy Study, March 2019, Vol. 9, No. 3, 121-133 doi: 10.17265/2159-5313/2019.03.001 D D AV I D PUBLISHING Media and Information Literacy in Inclusive Education: A Team Teaching Concept at the Technische Universität Dortmund Ingo Bosse, Gudrun Marci-Boehncke Technische Universität Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany There is a desideratum in the research about the interdependencies of inclusive education and media education. Digital media can facilitate individualized and cooperative learning. Additionally, digital media can be used to promote inclusion. However, which factors influence the acquisition of media and information literacy in inclusive education? Comparative international studies, e.g., the International Computer and Information Literacy Study (ICILS), show how social challenges, such as participation and handling heterogeneity at school, can be addressed through media. In numerous studies, it becomes apparent that German teachers do not sufficiently see the potential of digital media, especially for the improvement of learning opportunities for individuals with diverse learning requirements. German teachers are not well able to apply digital media appropriately in their lessons. Teachers need to be qualified and to design modern education with accessible media. In Germany, the ratio between available computers and pupils (1:4) is far better than the rate between teaching with and without computers. According to the teacher’s reports, only 9% of teachers are using digital media daily. Approximately 40% use digital media seldom
    [Show full text]
  • E-Learning Methodologies and Good Practices SECOND EDITION
    E-learning methodologies and good practices SECOND EDITION A guide for designing and delivering e-learning solutions from the FAO elearning Academy E-learning methodologies and good practices SECOND EDITION A guide for designing and delivering e-learning solutions from the FAO elearning Academy Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2021 II Required citation: FAO. 2021. E-learning methodologies and good practices: A guide for designing and delivering e-learning solutions from the FAO elearning Academy, second edition. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/i2516e The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. ISBN 978-92-5-134401-9 First edition, 2011 © FAO, 2021 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/ legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Our Lesson: Review of Quality Teaching in Higher Education Draft Report
    Learning our lesson: Review of Quality Teaching in Higher Education Draft report Fabrice Hénard 23 June 2009 FOREWORD 1. In the context of the sustained growth and diversification of higher education systems, civil society is increasingly concerned about the quality of programmes offered to students. As a result, there is an increase in public assessments and international comparisons of higher education institutions, not only within the higher education sector but in the general media. However, evaluation methods tend to overemphasise research, and to use research performance as a yardstick of an institution‟s value. If these assessment processes fail to address the quality of teaching, it is in part because measuring teaching quality is complex and difficult. 2. Institutions may implement schemes or evaluation mechanisms to identify and promote good teaching practices. The institutional environment of higher education institutions can also lead to enhancement of quality of the teaching in higher education through various means. 3. The goal of the OECD-Institutional Management in Higher Education (IMHE) project on quality teaching was to highlight effective quality initiatives and to encourage practices that may help other institutions to improve the quality of their teaching and thereby, the quality of their graduates. The project analysed the goal and scope of initiatives, and the role of the faculty members, the department, the central university and the state. The project sought to pinpoint long-term enhancement drivers of institutional support for staff and decision-making bodies, helping to fill the data gap in information on outcomes indicators for higher education. 4. The project examined the two main approaches to quality teaching: the top-down approach (those quality teaching initiatives taken by the institution collectively and determined by its leadership) and the bottom-up approach (those quality teaching initiatives taken by the teachers and which may nevertheless have an influence on the institutional policy on quality teaching).
    [Show full text]
  • A Formative Evaluation of Personal Learning Networks for Professional Development in the Architecture and Design Industry
    A Formative Evaluation of Personal Learning Networks for Professional Development in the Architecture and Design Industry Leigh A. Lally Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Architecture and Design Research James R. Jones, Chair Kihong Ku Jennifer M. Brill D. Scott McCrickard March 28, 2014 Blacksburg, VA Keywords: personal learning networks, integrated design practice, professional development, architecture and design industry Copyright 2014, Leigh A. Lally A Formative Evaluation of Personal Learning Networks for Professional Development in the Architecture and Design Industry Leigh A. Lally ABSTRACT This research is a formative evaluation of personal learning networks to determine their applicability for professional development in the architecture and design industry. The researcher seeks to find a catalyst toward discipline-wide realization of integrated design practices. This research initiative was spurred by leaders in the field who indicate that a swift transformation to integrated design practice is required in the discipline in order for the practice of architecture to remain effective in today’s global economy. The AIA knowledge community has designated this issue a primary focus for professional development, yet innovative solutions for timely and effective knowledge transfer at a discipline-wide scale do not currently exist. Concurrently, there is active research in computer-based organizational learning within the social sciences, education and the human computer interaction disciplines, indicating its potential as an effective method for the dissemination of knowledge. The research strategy draws upon the human computer interaction discipline’s user-centered design philosophy to harness the disciplines knowledge by actively engaging experts in a formative evaluation of personal learning networks using the Delphi method.
    [Show full text]