DOCSLIB.ORG

Iliamna Region, Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 485 A GEOLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE OF THE ILIAMNA REGION, ALASKA BY G. C. MARTIN AND F. J. KATZ WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 CONTENTS. Tage. Preface, by Alfred H. Brooks________________.._________ 9 Introduction_____________________________________ 11 Location ____________________________________ 11 Geographic features____..________________________ 11 Topography ___________________,______________ 11 Lakes.__________________________________ 13 Rivers___________________________.._____ 13 Glaciers______.._________________________ 14 Climate____________________________.. 15 Vegetation __________..____________:____________ 16 General features____________________________ 10 Forests _________________________________ 1C Treeless areas _____________________________ IS Cause of limits of forests_______________________ 19 Settlements__________________________________ 20 Transportation routes____________________________ 21 Account of investigations___________________________ 23 Geology______________________________________ 25 General features of the region______________________ 25 Geologic subproviuces ____________________________ 26 Cook Inlet basin_____________________________-- 26 Chigmit Mountains____________________________ 27 Alaska Peninsula ____________ ____________ 28 Ilianma Basin__________.._______________..___ 28 Bering Sea coastal plaiu______ _ _ __ 29 Stratigraphic geology _____ ___ _________________ 30 General features____________________________ 30 Paleozoic rocks _____________________________ 30 Gneisses and quartzite schists___________________ 30 Areal distribution _ ____________________ 30 Lithologic character_______________________ 31 Age_______________________________ 32 Crystalline limestone and calcareous schist__________ 32 Areal distribution______________________ 32 Lithologic character ..____________________ 33 Age_________________________________ 34 Paleozoic or early Mesozoic rocks________________ 35 Slate and chert___ _ _ ____________ S5 Areal distribution________________________ 35 Lithologic character____________________ 36 Age_______________________________ 37 Greenstones ______ _ _ __________ 38 Areal distribution. ______________________ 38 Petrographic description__________________ 39 Age _ _ _ ____________ 40 3 4 CONTENTS. G eology Continued. Stratigraphic geology Continued. Page. Mesozoic rocks_____________________________ 41 Upper Triassic rocks______ ___ ________ 41 Limestone___________________________ 41 Areal distribution._ _ _ _ ___ 41 Lithologic character and stratigraphic relation­ ships____________________________ 42 Fauna __________ ______ 44 Age and correlation___________________ 46 Kamishak chert________________ _ 47 Areal distribution____________________ 47 Lithologic character________________..__ 47 Fauna-____________________________ 48 Age and correlation_______ _ ___ 48 Lower Jurassic ( ?) rocks_________ _________ 50 Porphyries and tuffs_________ ___ __ _ 50 Areal distribution____________.____..__ 50 Lithologic character in Cook Inlet district_____ 51 Lithologic character in Lake Clark district____ 53 Lithologic character in Iliamna Lake district-.___ 56 Age and correlation_________^__ ____ 58 Middle Jurassic rocks________________ 59 Tuxedui sandstone __________________ 59 Areal distribution____________________ 59 Lithologic character and sections___________ 59 Fauna and flora_____________________ 62 Age and correlation_________L__ __ 63 Chinitna shale_________________________ 65 Areal distribution____________________ 65 Lithologic character and sections __________ 65 Fauna and flora______________________ 66 Age and correlation ___________________ 68 Upper Jurassic rocks________________ ______ 68 Cliisik conglomerate_________________ 68 Areal distribution_____________________ 68 Lithologic character_______________..__ 68 Age and correlation__________________ 68 Naknek formation________________________ 69 Areal distribution____.______________ 69 Lithologic character and sections___________ 69 Fauna____________________________ 73 Age and correlation____________________ 73 Granitic rocks _________________________ 74 Areal distribution_________ ____________ 74 Petrographic description________ ;___________ 74 Age_______________________________ 76 Tertiary rocks__ ________________ __.. 77 Sedimentary beds.______________ _^________ 77 Areal distribution_______________________ 77 Lithologic character ____________.________ 77 Flora and age____________________ ______ ^ 78 CONTENTS. 5 Geology Continued. Stratigrapliic geology Continued. Tertiary rocks Continued. Page. Basaltic flows and tuft's______________________ 78 Areal distribution____________________ 78 Petrographic character ___________ ____ 79 ' Stratigrapliic relations_____________.._______ 81 Flora___________________.__________ 81 Age and correlation_____________ ___ 82 Quaternary deposits___________________________ 82 Glacial deposits_________________________ 82 Areal extent__________________________ 82 Character of the deposits__________________ 82 Conditions of deposition__________________ S3 Existing glaciers______________________ S3 Former glaciation____________________ 85 Terrace gravels__________________________ 88 Areal extent________________________ 88 Character of the deposits__________________ 90 Conditions of deposition_.________________ 92 Beach and flood-plain deposits_________________ 93 Recent volcanic deposits____________________ 94 Structure__________________________________^_ 94 Introduction_________________________________ 94 Cook Inlet forelands______________.._________ 95 General features__________________________ 95 'Local observations________________________ 95 Tuxedni Bay___________________________ 95 Coast between Tuxedni and Chinitna bays _______ 96 Chinitna Bay___________________________ 97 Coast between Chinitna and Iniskin bays_________ 98 Iniskin Bay______________________._____ 98 Ursus Cove__________________________ 99 Coast between Ursus Cove and Bruin Bay_________ 100 Bruin Bay____________________________ 100 Coast of Kanrishak Bay, south of Bruin Bay_______ 100 Chigruit Mountains____________________________ 100 General features__________________________ 100 Local observations_________________________ 101 Iliamna Bay_\__________________________________ 101 Mountains between Iliamna and Pile Bays________ 102 Pile Bay___________________________.___ 104 Chekok and Tazimiua valleys and neighboring districts. 104 Kontrashibuna Valley____________________ 105 Upper end of Lake Clark_________________ 105 Iliamua Basin________________________________ 108 General features__________________________ 108 Local observations__________________________ 108 Bering Sea coastal plain______________________ 109 Historical geology___________^____________________ 110 Mineral resources ____ _ ___ ____ _______ 113 General statement______________._________________ 113 Geographic distribution___________________________ 113 6 CONTENTS. Mineral resources Continued. ( Page. Geologic occurrence_____^_______________________ 114 Description of mineral deposits_______________________ 116 Copper __________________________________ 116 Occurrence of the ores______________________ 116 Copper minerals__________________________ 117 Descriptions of claims_________________._____ 117 Dutton prospects_________________ _____ 117 Copper King group______________ ________ 121 Kasna Creek claims________________ _____ .121 Millet claims_________________________ 122 Durand prospect_______________________ 123 Knutson prospect_________________:____ 123 Silver___________________________________ 124 Occurrence of the ores_________________:____ 124 Silver-bearing minerals_______________________ 124 Descriptions of claims__________T________..___ 124 Duryea claims__.._______________ _...____ 124 Gold______________________________________ 125 Lodes________________________________ 125 Claims on Iliamna Bay______________._____ 125 Aukney claim__________________________ 125 Placers___________________________.. __..__ 12G Petroleum______________,___________________ 126 Surface indications________________________ 126 Developments____________________________ 127 Character o'f the petroleum___________________ 129 Notes on the Mulchatna region_________________________ 131 Introductory statement___________________________ 131 Routes and supply points__________________________ 131 Prospects_._________________________________. 132 Index ________-_____________________________ 135 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PLATE I. Topographic map of the Iliamua regio_ ________ In pocket. II. Geologic map of the Iliamua region_____________ In pocket. III. A, Iliamua village and river, showing character of lowlands in valleys tributary to Iliamna Lake; B, Tanalian Falls, show­ ing water power and character of timber on Lake Clark___ 14 IV. Map showing distribution of forests_____ _______ 16 V. A, Closely folded Kamishak chert on south shore of Bruin Bay; B, Kamishak chert with intrusive sheet or flow of basic igneous rock on north shore of Ursus Cove__________ 40 VI. A, Banded rhyolite from south shore of Iliamna Lake; B, Chisik conglomerate on east shore of Iniskin Bay _______ 56 VII. A, Naknek formation and underlying Chinitna shale on east shore of Oil Bay; B, Horizontal sandstone beds of Naknek formation on west shore of Kamishak Bay__________ 66 VIII. A, Accordant mountain summits, showing Mount Iliamna rising above them and smooth, glaciated slopes below; B, Mount Augustine from the
Recommended publications
  • Gymnosperm Foliage from the Upper Triassic of Lunz, Lower Austria: an Annotated Check List and Identification Key

    Gymnosperm Foliage from the Upper Triassic of Lunz, Lower Austria: an Annotated Check List and Identification Key

    Geo.Alp, Vol. 7, S. 19–38, 2010 GYMNOSPERM FOLIAGE FROM THE UPPER TRIASSIC OF LUNZ, LOWER AUSTRIA: AN ANNOTATED CHECK LIST AND IDENTIFICATION KEY Christian Pott1 & Michael Krings2 With 7 figures and 1 table 1 Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Sektionen för paleobotanik, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] 2 Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Paläontologie und Geobiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, and Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Richard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 München, Germany; [email protected] Abstract The famous Lunz flora from Lower Austria is one of the richest and most diverse Late Triassic floras of the Northern He- misphere. The historical outcrops (mainly coal mines) are no longer accessible, but showy fossils can still be collected from natural exposures around the town of Lunz-am-See and from several of the old spoil tips. This paper presents an annotated check list with characterisations of all currently recognised gymnosperm foliage taxa in the Lunz flora. The descriptions are exemplified by illustrations of typical specimens and diagnostic features of the leaf morphology and epidermal anatomy. Moreover, a simple identification key for the taxa based on macromorphological features is provided that facilitates identification of newly collected specimens. 1. Introduction The Carnian (Late Triassic) flora from Lunz in Lo- ments (i.e. reproductive structures) among the fossils wer Austria is one of only a few well-preserved flo- (see e.g., Krasser, 1917, 1919; Kräusel, 1948, 1949, ras from the Alpine Triassic (Cleal, 1993; Dobruskina, 1953; Pott et al., 2010), the most striking feature of 1998).
  • Technical Paper No. 302 Subsistence Harvests

    Technical Paper No. 302 Subsistence Harvests

    Technical Paper No. 302 Subsistence Harvests and Uses of Wild Resources in Iliamna, Newhalen, Nondalton, Pedro Bay, and Port Alsworth, Alaska, 2004 by James A. Fall, Davin L. Holen, Brian Davis, Theodore Krieg, and David Koster December 2006 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the following reports by the Divisions of Sport Fish and of Commercial Fisheries: Fishery Manuscripts, Fishery Data Series Reports, Fishery Management Reports, and Special Publications. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Measures (fisheries) centimeter cm Alaska Administrative fork length FL deciliter dL Code AAC mideye-to-fork MEF gram g all commonly accepted mideye-to-tail-fork METF hectare ha abbreviations e.g., Mr., Mrs., standard length SL kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. total length TL kilometer km all commonly accepted liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., Mathematics, statistics meter m R.N., etc. all standard mathematical milliliter mL at @ signs, symbols and millimeter mm compass directions: abbreviations east E alternate hypothesis HA Weights and measures (English) north N base of natural logarithm e cubic feet per second ft3/s south S catch per unit effort CPUE foot ft west W coefficient of variation CV gallon gal copyright ¤ common test statistics (F, t, F2, etc.) inch in corporate suffixes: confidence interval CI mile mi Company Co.
  • USGS Professional Paper 1739-A

    USGS Professional Paper 1739-A

    Studies by the U.S. Geological Survey in Alaska, 2006 U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1739–A Blue Mountain and The Gas Rocks: Rear-Arc Dome Clusters on the Alaska Peninsula By Wes Hildreth, Judy Fierstein, and Andrew T. Calvert Abstract pal nearby town) and 15 to 20 km behind (northwest of) the volcanic-front chain, which is locally defined by Kejulik and Behind the single-file chain of stratovolcanoes on the Peulik stratovolcanoes (fig. 1). The Gas Rocks form a knobby Alaska Peninsula, independent rear-arc vents for mafic mag- peninsula at the south shore of Becharof Lake, and Blue mas are uncommon, and for silicic magmas rarer still. We Mountain is a group of rounded hills a few kilometers west of report here the characteristics, compositions, and ages of two Upper Ugashik Lake (fig. 2). Both dome clusters rise abruptly andesite-dacite dome clusters and of several nearby basaltic above a nearly flat (virtually treeless and roadless) plain of units, all near Becharof Lake and 15 to 20 km behind the late Pleistocene glacial deposits (Detterman and others, 1987a, volcanic front. Blue Mountain consists of 13 domes (58–68 b), consisting largely of till and outwash, supplemented by the bog and lacustrine deposits of hundreds of ponds and by weight percent SiO2) and The Gas Rocks of three domes (62–64.5 weight percent SiO ) and a mafic cone (52 weight beach and terrace deposits along the lakeshores. The enor- 2 mous moraine-dammed lakes (fig. 2) are generally shallower percent SiO2). All 16 domes are amphibole-biotite-plagio- clase felsite, and nearly all are phenocryst rich and quartz than 5 m, and their surfaces are barely 10 m above sea level.
  • Where We Found a Whale"

    Where We Found a Whale"

    ______ __.,,,,---­ ....... l-:~-- ~ ·--~-- - "Where We Found a Whale" A -~lSTORY OF LAKE CLARK NATlONAL PARK AND PRESERVE Brian Fagan “Where We Found a Whale” A HISTORY OF LAKE CLARK NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE Brian Fagan s the nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has resposibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protect- ing our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for enjoyment of life Athrough outdoor recreation. The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have respon- sibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archaeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethno- graphic resources. Our mission is to identify, evaluate, and preserve the cultural resources of the park areas and to bring an understanding of these resources to the public. Congress has mandated that we preserve these resources because they are important components of our national and personal identity. Published by the United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Lake Clark National Park and Preserve ISBN 978-0-9796432-4-8 NPS Research/Resources Management Report NPR/AP/CRR/2008-69 For Jeanne Schaaf with Grateful Thanks “Then she said: “Now look where you come from—the sunrise side.” He turned and saw that they were at a land above the human land, which was below them to the east. And all kinds of people were coming up from the lower country, and they didn’t have any clothes on.
  • The Lower Cretaceous Flora of the Gates Formation from Western Canada

    The Lower Cretaceous Flora of the Gates Formation from Western Canada

    The Lower Cretaceous Flora of the Gates Formation from Western Canada A Shesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Geological Sciences Univ. of Saska., Saskatoon?SI(, Canada S7N 3E2 b~ Zhihui Wan @ Copyright Zhihui Mian, 1996. Al1 rights reserved. National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington Ottawa ON KlA ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Libraxy of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la fome de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur foxmat électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. College of Graduate Studies and Research SUMMARY OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirernents for the DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ZHIRUI WAN Depart ment of Geological Sciences University of Saskatchewan Examining Commit tee: Dr.
  • Coevolution of Cycads and Dinosaurs George E

    Coevolution of Cycads and Dinosaurs George E

    Coevolution of cycads and dinosaurs George E. Mustoe* INTRODUCTION TOXICOLOGY OF EXTANT CYCADS cycads suggests that the biosynthesis of ycads were a major component of Illustrations in textbooks commonly these compounds was a trait that C forests during the Mesozoic Era, the depict herbivorous dinosaurs browsing evolved early in the history of the shade of their fronds falling upon the on cycad fronds, but biochemical evi- Cycadales. Brenner et al. (2002) sug- scaly backs of multitudes of dinosaurs dence from extant cycads suggests that gested that macrozamin possibly serves a that roamed the land. Paleontologists these reconstructions are incorrect. regulatory function during cycad have long postulated that cycad foliage Foliage of modern cycads is highly toxic growth, but a strong case can be made provided an important food source for to vertebrates because of the presence that the most important reason for the reptilian herbivores, but the extinction of two powerful neurotoxins and carcin- evolution of cycad toxins was their of dinosaurs and the contemporaneous ogens, cycasin (methylazoxymethanol- usefulness as a defense against foliage precipitous decline in cycad popula- beta-D-glucoside) and macrozamin (beta- predation at a time when dinosaurs were tions at the close of the Cretaceous N-methylamine-L-alanine). Acute symp- the dominant herbivores. The protective have generally been assumed to have toms triggered by cycad foliage inges- role of these toxins is evidenced by the resulted from different causes. Ecologic tion include vomiting, diarrhea, and seed dispersal characteristics of effects triggered by a cosmic impact are abdominal cramps, followed later by loss modern cycads. a widely-accepted explanation for dino- of coordination and paralysis of the saur extinction; cycads are presumed to limbs.
  • Climate at Lake Clark NPP NPS/P

    Climate at Lake Clark NPP NPS/P

    Southwest Alaska Network National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior SWAN Inventory & Monitoring Program Southwest Alaska Network Alagnak Aniakchak Katmai Kenai Fjords Lake Clark Climate at Lake Clark NPP NPS/P. Kirchner NPS/P. The Lake Clark region, located in southcentral Alaska, has two distinct climates that are divided southwest to northeast by the Alaska and Aleutian mountain ranges. To the southeast, the Cook Inlet and the Pacific Ocean significantly influence the climate of the region by moderating the transfer of energy and water vapor to and from the atmosphere resulting in a maritime climate. To the northwest, the mountains form a barrier, resulting in climate patterns more typical of Alaska’s western interior that are sometimes influenced by the moderating effects of the Bristol Bay to the southwest. Figure 1 provides examples of how mean annual monthly temperatures vary relative to their locations: Silver Salmon Weather station in the Chigmit Mountains of Lake Clark National Park and Preserve. (maritime) is more moderate, Chigmit Mountains (higher elevation) is colder, and Snipe Lake (interior) has greater Weather Highlights extremes. • 2014 and 2015 were the Recent winter temperatures have warmest years on record. • One of the ten warmest spring frequently been out of the normal seasons have occurred in the range. Regionally, 2014 and 2015 were • 2014 and 2015 winter and last 10 years. the warmest years on record. In Port spring maximum temperatures at Port Alsworth were the • Seven of the ten warmest Alsworth, the recent temperatures hottest years on record. maximum three-day extremes for winter and spring months have since 1960 have occurred in frequently been near the maximums for • Three of the ten warmest the last 10 years.
  • May Meeting Minutes

    May Meeting Minutes

    Discussion Draft Meeting Minutes of the Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction 7 May 2009, 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., Department of Commerce, Room 1414 Italics indicate absent members. “T” indicate members participating via teleconference. Officers David Applegate (USGS), Chair NSTC Liaison Dennis Wenger (NSF), Vice-Chair Jonathan Kolak (OSTP) Margaret Davidson (NOAA) Designated Representatives BLM Edwin Roberson EDA Audrey Clarke NSF Dennis Wenger Ronald Huntsinger EPA Peter Jutro OPHS Sven Rodenbeck CDC Mark Keim Stephen Clark State Cari Enav DHS Bruce Davis FERC Berne Mosley Fernando Echavarria DHS/FEMA Deborah Ingram HUD David Engel USACE Barbara J. Sotirin DHS/USCG Steven Cohen NASA Andrea Donnellan Dimitra Syriopoulou DOD Al Johnson NGA Stephen Homeyer USAID Sezin Tokar DOE Patricia Hoffman NGB Daniel Bochicchio USDA TBD DOT Kelly Leone NIH Allen Dearry USFS Carlos Rodriguez- Sheila Duwadi NIST William Grosshandler Franco Tim Schmidt Jack Hayes USGS David Applegate EOP/OSTP Jonathan Kolak NOAA John Gaynor Paula Gori Other Attendees DHS/FEMA Candice Abinanti NOAA Tom Graziano Barbara Haines-Parmele EPA Brendan Doyle Maria Honeycutt State Nellie Moore NGA Dana Miller Mike Hudson USGS John Eichelberger NGB Lisa Burg Secretariat Ross Faith Agenda Handouts 10:00 Welcome and Introductions Agenda 10:05 Approval of March 31st Meeting Minutes March 31st Meeting Minutes 10:10 Report from the Chair Coastal Group Kickoff Meeting 10:25 Report from the Vice-Chairs Announcement 10:40 Report from the NSTC Liaison Opportunity to Support SDR 10:55 Presentation: Red River Flood FY2010 Letter 11:25 Presentation: Mount Redoubt Eruption Red River Flood Presentation 11:55 Close and Next Actions Handout Discussion Draft I.
  • Cupressinocladus Sp., Newly Found from the Lower Cretaceous Wakino Formation, West Japan

    Cupressinocladus Sp., Newly Found from the Lower Cretaceous Wakino Formation, West Japan

    Bull. Kitakyushu Mus. Nat. Hist., 11: 79-86. March 30, 1992 Cupressinocladus sp., Newly Found from the Lower Cretaceous Wakino Formation, West Japan Tatsuaki Kimura*, Tamiko Ohana* and Gentaro Naito** •Institute of Natural History, 24-14-3 Takada, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 171, Japan **26-9 Higashi-Malsuzaki-cho, Hofu City, Yamaguchi Prefecture, 747, Japan (Received August 17, 1991) Abstract The typical Ryoscki-type plant, Cupressinocladus sp. was found from the equivalent of the Wakino Formation, Yamaguchi Prefecture. This paper deals with its description and its significance for the Early Cretaceous phytogeography in Japan. Introduction The Lower Cretaceous Wakino Formation (formerly called Wakino Subgroup), lower half of the Kwanmon Group of non-marine origin, yields various fossil animals. But no identifiable fossil plant had been known from the Wakino Formation and its equivalents (Murakami, 1960) distributed on the west ofOgori-cho, Yamaguchi City. The present Cupressinocladus sp. is the only identifiable plant hitherto known. The specimen is poorly preserved and seems to be botanically worthless, but is palaeophy- togeographically significant as mentioned below. We thank Mr. Naoe Ishikawa whocollected the present specimen and offered it for our study. Our thanks are extended to Dr. Shya Chitaley of the Cleveland Museum ofNatural History for herlinguistic check on the manuscript ofthis paper. Palaeophytogeographical significance The Wakino Formation is considered by most geologists and palaeontologists in Japan to be of late Neocomian age [e.g. Matsumoto, 1954 (editor), 1978] on the basis of its non-marine fauna and its stratigraphical position. Equivalent sediments are widely distributed in Japan. They are Itoshiro Group (including the Akaiwa Subgroup) in the Inner Zone of Central Japan and the Ryoseki and Arida Forma tions and theirequivalents in theOuter Zone.
  • Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, Alaska Water

    Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, Alaska Water

    LAKE CLARK NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE, ALASKA WATER RESOURCES SCOPING REPORT Don P. Weeks Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2001/292 United States Department of the Interior • National Park Service The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 ii LAKE CLARK NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE ALASKA WATER RESOURCES SCOPING REPORT Don P. Weeks1 Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2003/??? Month, 2003
  • The Southern Alaska Range

    The Southern Alaska Range

    .UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 862 THE SOUTHERN ALASKA RANGE BY STEPHEN R. CAPPS UNITED STATES .GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1935 'Forsale bythe Superintendent-,of Documents, Washington, D. 0. --------- Price 70 cents ' ' CONTENTS ' ' Page Abstract.________________________________________________________ 1 Introduction.. _ _______________ ____________________________________ 2 Previous explorations and surveys-_____--____-_____--________.______ 3 Present investigation______________________________________________ 9 Geography ____--________-_-_-_---__-__-.__.__.____._______.______ 15 Drainage ______-_-.____-_..____.___________._______________... 15 Glaciers.._---_-----.---------__------_---___-_-_-___---____-. 25 Relief..__-----_---.---------_-----------__----_-_-----__---_ 25 Climate--....--.---..--.-.---.------.---.-------------------- 27 Vegetation ___________________________________________________ 28 Wild animals..____.__.-__.___________.-_..._..______---______ 30 ... "Routes of travel.___-.------------.-_----._-_-_----_--_-_-_-_- 31 Population._________-_______...__._.__________'_______________ 34 Geology_____-..._----_.--.---------.-.-.-_---__.-_._--.-_--_-_. 35 General outline.__-___-_____._________...______ __-______._._._ 35 Paleozoic rocks._-_----- ----.----.----.-_--_--_..._.--_-_-__ 37 Gneiss, mica schist, and quartzite.------_-----___._-----____ 37 '. Crystalline limestone and calcareous schist.---____.___-_-_-__ 39 Paleozoic or early Mesozoic rocks. _______________________________ 42 Slate and chert..__________________________________________ 42 Mesozoic rocks._____-----------_-_-___-..-_---_-_---._----____ 44 Greenstones._-___-----_--___--____-_____--_.-__-___--____ 44 Upper Triassic limestone and chert.._______________.____._.. 45 Lower Jurassic (?) lava flows and tuffs____-----_______--.._-__ 47 Undiffere;ntiated Jurassic-and Cretaceous^sediments.___-__-_-- 51 Tertiary rocks.___-_-_-.-_.
  • 022 Section 3.15 – Geohazards and Seismic Conditions

    022 Section 3.15 – Geohazards and Seismic Conditions

    PEBBLE PROJECT CHAPTER 3: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 3.15 GEOHAZARDS AND SEISMIC CONDITIONS This section provides information currently available regarding seismic and other geological hazards (geohazards) in the vicinity of the project. Geohazards include tectonic processes (e.g., earthquakes, volcanoes), surficial or geomorphological processes (e.g., landslides) and other hazards (e.g., ice effects, erosion, tsunamis). Regional-scale descriptions of the geohazards are presented in this section, enhanced with local information gathered from geotechnical engineering studies where available. The project area is in a region of active tectonic processes, and the potential for multiple types of geohazards across the project area depends on location, topography, natural materials present, and proximity to hazard sources. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) analysis area for geohazards ranges from the immediate vicinity of the project footprint for each alternative (e.g., slope instability) to regional areas with geohazards that could affect project facilities from long distances (e.g., earthquakes, volcanoes). 3.15.1 Earthquakes 3.15.1.1 Active Faults The project is in a tectonically active region of southern Alaska near the subduction zone between the Pacific and North American plates. Both shallow crustal earthquakes and deeper earthquakes associated with the subduction zone megathrust affect this region. A description of the regional tectonic setting is provided in Section 3.13, Geology. In general, faults that have demonstrated geologic displacement and earthquakes during the Holocene epoch (the last 11,000 years) are considered to be active, and have potential for future movement. Evidence for fault activity might include offset surface features (such as stream channels), sag ponds along a fault, surface vegetation changes, lineaments depicted by remote sensing data, and subsurface seismicity (earthquake record) aligned with a certain fault.