The Films of Nicholas Ray: the Poet of Nightfall

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

G. Andrew The Films of Nicholas Ray: The Poet of Nightfall Films like In a Lonely Place, Johnny Guitar, They Live by Night, and most of all Rebel Without a Cause were to ensure cult status for Ray as one of the most revered of all American 'maverick' auteurs. This new edition of Geoff Andrew's unique and acclaimed study of his films discusses Ray's stylistic artistry and abiding thematic concerns, and his work with such legends as James Dean, Humphrey Bogart, James Mason, Joan Crawford and Richard Burton. Above all the book shows how the vivid emotional authenticity of his films, coupled with his special brand of visual expressionism and his eloquently voiced disenchantment with the American Dream, were in established for him a profoundly loyal following in America and Europe that lasts to this day. This new edition, which covers all of Ray's films, includes an updated introduction and fresh reflections on the enduring importance in the 21st century of one of the greatest directors to have worked in Hollywood. 2004 Printed book Hardcover ISBN 978-1-84457-000-3 ▶ 85,99 € | £73.99 ▶ *92,01 € (D) | 94,59 € (A) | CHF 95.00 The first € price and the £ and $ price are net prices, subject to local VAT. Prices indicated with * include VAT for books; the €(D) includes 7% for Germany, the €(A) includes 10% for Austria. Prices indicated with ** include VAT for electronic products; 19% for Germany, 20% for Austria. All prices exclusive of carriage charges. Prices and other details are subject to change without notice. All errors and omissions excepted. Bloomsbury.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

PDF Download in a Lonely Place Pdf Free Download
IN A LONELY PLACE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Dorothy B. Hughes | 192 pages | 06 May 2010 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780141192314 | English | London, United Kingdom In a Lonely Place PDF Book This is a crisp black-and-white film with an almost ruthless efficiency of style. But what of the real thing? Guy Beach Swan. Well, if that's not wrapping it up with a nice pink ribbon, I don't know what is; and, as I came closer and closer to the end of it I said, 'Well, today is the day and I have to be ready. February 11, Concert. Yet perhaps they all sensed that they were doing the best work of their careers -- a film could be based on those three people and that experience. Now it doesn't matter Power pop , alternative rock. Short Takes — Nov 18, Thanks to the Whitney museum, the floating garden made it onto the water for a week in That ideal of simmering rapport underlies their first exchanges of glance and gaze and repartee, cinematically framed by the courtyard of their Spanish-style apartment complex. He starts writing again. As befits a film about a screenwriter, the film is intriguingly self-aware. A tour de force laying open the mind and motives of a killer with extraordinary empathy. But what makes this a heartbreaking tragedy instead of a jaded satire is that, beneath its bruised pessimism, the film still clings to the hope that art and integrity and love can survive in the wasteland—a hope that dies slowly, agonizingly before our eyes.
[Show full text]
Lonely Places, Dangerous Ground
Introduction Nicholas Ray and the Potential of Cinema Culture STEVEN RYBIN AND WILL SCHEIBEL THE DIRECTOR OF CLASSIC FILMS SUCH AS They Live by Night, In a Lonely Place, Johnny Guitar, Rebel Without a Cause, and Bigger Than Life, among others, Nicholas Ray was the “cause célèbre of the auteur theory,” as critic Andrew Sarris once put it (107).1 But unlike his senior colleagues in Hollywood such as Alfred Hitchcock or Howard Hawks, he remained a director at the margins of the American studio system. So too has he remained at the margins of academic film scholarship. Many fine schol‑ arly works on Ray, of course, have been published, ranging from Geoff Andrew’s important auteur study The Films of Nicholas Ray: The Poet of Nightfall and Bernard Eisenschitz’s authoritative biography Nicholas Ray: An American Journey (both first published in English in 1991 and 1993, respectively) to books on individual films by Ray, such as Dana Polan’s 1993 monograph on In a Lonely Place and J. David Slocum’s 2005 col‑ lection of essays on Rebel Without a Cause. In 2011, the year of his centennial, the restoration of his final film,We Can’t Go Home Again, by his widow and collaborator Susan Ray, signaled renewed interest in the director, as did the publication of a new biography, Nicholas Ray: The Glorious Failure of an American Director, by Patrick McGilligan. Yet what Nicholas Ray’s films tell us about Classical Hollywood cinema, what it was and will continue to be, is far from certain. 1 © 2014 State University of New York Press, Albany 2 Steven Rybin and Will Scheibel After all, what most powerfully characterizes Ray’s films is not only what they are—products both of Hollywood’s studio and genre systems—but also what they might be.
[Show full text]
Bigger Than Life Is Now Generally Regarded As One of the More Important Films of Its Time
Bigger Than Life is now generally regarded as one of the more important films of its time. Martin Scorsese included it in his documentary A Personal Journey Through American Movies and cites it as one of the most expressive films of the entire US cinema. Nicholas Ray did a lot of living before he ever got around to filmmaking. After writing and producing radio programsi his teens, Nicholas Ray was invited by Frank Lloyd Wright (whom he had met at an event organized by New York’s Columbia University) to join the first class of his newly created Taliesin Fellowship in 1931 -- an encounter that only lasted less than a year (1932-1933) but yielded in Ray a respect for the horizontal line that was central to Ray’s subsequent affinity with CinemaScope (and this is evident in Bigger Than Life). In Taliesin Ray also developed a feeling for architectural balance in the mise-en-scène (but also in characer construction) that became fundamental in his work. Contrary to many claims and by his own account, Ray spent almost an entire year under Wright's tutelage. The concept of the Fellowship was that Wright felt only by living and working with apprentices around the clock could the understand his concepts and ideas. As a social experiment, it was quite interesting. Members of the Fellowship not only actively executed ideas on Taliesin itself (the buildings there were in a state of constant change), but worked as draughtsmen, farmhands, and domestics on the property. Living was for the most part communal. Many have commented that a political rift between Wright, a strong believer in the power of democracy, and his more radical-leaning protege was the cause of the latter's return to New York, which would eventually lead him to Hollywood and the world of film-making.
[Show full text]
<I>In a Lonely Place</I>, Directed by Nicholas Ray, USA, 1950*
9-Arts Reviews_CAFP_9.qxp 15/02/2019 10:10 Page 86 ARTS REVIEWS In a Lonely Place, directed by Nicholas Ray, USA, 1950* Reviewed by Ann Hardy One autumn night, a score of therapists met to watch a film that was older than most of them. In a Lonely Place is the story of a brief relationship between screenwriter and war veteran, Dixon (“Dix”) Steele (Humphrey Bogart) and his glamorous and sophisticated neighbour, actress Laurel Gray (Gloria Grahame). Shot in black and white, the film is spare: in a few short minutes we meet Dix and discover that he has not been able to write anything original since before the war, surviving by churning out screenplays of popular novels. We also learn that he is violent; indeed we see him in a number of fights, and are told that he broke the nose of a previous lover. His justification for his violence is always the same: “They had it coming.” Here is a man who is dangerous, but all that is bad is projected outwards. The story develops when Dix is suspected of murdering Mildred Atkinson, a naïve young woman, who lives with her aunt, and checks coats at Dix’s favourite bar. Dix invites Mildred to his apartment to tell him the story of a novel for which he has to write the screenplay, but which he is too apathetic to read. The next morning Mildred is found dead and Dix is taken to the police station for questioning. He is released when an alibi is provided by Laurel, who has just moved into the apartment opposite, and who saw Mildred leave.
[Show full text]
1,000 Films to See Before You Die Published in the Guardian, June 2007
1,000 Films to See Before You Die Published in The Guardian, June 2007 http://film.guardian.co.uk/1000films/0,,2108487,00.html Ace in the Hole (Billy Wilder, 1951) Prescient satire on news manipulation, with Kirk Douglas as a washed-up hack making the most of a story that falls into his lap. One of Wilder's nastiest, most cynical efforts, who can say he wasn't actually soft-pedalling? He certainly thought it was the best film he'd ever made. Ace Ventura: Pet Detective (Tom Shadyac, 1994) A goofy detective turns town upside-down in search of a missing dolphin - any old plot would have done for oven-ready megastar Jim Carrey. A ski-jump hairdo, a zillion impersonations, making his bum "talk" - Ace Ventura showcases Jim Carrey's near-rapturous gifts for physical comedy long before he became encumbered by notions of serious acting. An Actor's Revenge (Kon Ichikawa, 1963) Prolific Japanese director Ichikawa scored a bulls-eye with this beautifully stylized potboiler that took its cues from traditional Kabuki theatre. It's all ballasted by a terrific double performance from Kazuo Hasegawa both as the female-impersonator who has sworn vengeance for the death of his parents, and the raucous thief who helps him. The Addiction (Abel Ferrara, 1995) Ferrara's comic-horror vision of modern urban vampires is an underrated masterpiece, full- throatedly bizarre and offensive. The vampire takes blood from the innocent mortal and creates another vampire, condemned to an eternity of addiction and despair. Ferrara's mob movie The Funeral, released at the same time, had a similar vision of violence and humiliation.
[Show full text]
XXXI:4) Robert Montgomery, LADY in the LAKE (1947, 105 Min)
September 22, 2015 (XXXI:4) Robert Montgomery, LADY IN THE LAKE (1947, 105 min) (The version of this handout on the website has color images and hot urls.) Directed by Robert Montgomery Written by Steve Fisher (screenplay) based on the novel by Raymond Chandler Produced by George Haight Music by David Snell and Maurice Goldman (uncredited) Cinematography by Paul Vogel Film Editing by Gene Ruggiero Art Direction by E. Preston Ames and Cedric Gibbons Special Effects by A. Arnold Gillespie Robert Montgomery ... Phillip Marlowe Audrey Totter ... Adrienne Fromsett Lloyd Nolan ... Lt. DeGarmot Tom Tully ... Capt. Kane Leon Ames ... Derace Kingsby Jayne Meadows ... Mildred Havelend Pink Horse, 1947 Lady in the Lake, 1945 They Were Expendable, Dick Simmons ... Chris Lavery 1941 Here Comes Mr. Jordan, 1939 Fast and Loose, 1938 Three Morris Ankrum ... Eugene Grayson Loves Has Nancy, 1937 Ever Since Eve, 1937 Night Must Fall, Lila Leeds ... Receptionist 1936 Petticoat Fever, 1935 Biography of a Bachelor Girl, 1934 William Roberts ... Artist Riptide, 1933 Night Flight, 1932 Faithless, 1931 The Man in Kathleen Lockhart ... Mrs. Grayson Possession, 1931 Shipmates, 1930 War Nurse, 1930 Our Blushing Ellay Mort ... Chrystal Kingsby Brides, 1930 The Big House, 1929 Their Own Desire, 1929 Three Eddie Acuff ... Ed, the Coroner (uncredited) Live Ghosts, 1929 The Single Standard. Robert Montgomery (director, actor) (b. May 21, 1904 in Steve Fisher (writer, screenplay) (b. August 29, 1912 in Marine Fishkill Landing, New York—d. September 27, 1981, age 77, in City, Michigan—d. March 27, age 67, in Canoga Park, California) Washington Heights, New York) was nominated for two Academy wrote for 98 various stories for film and television including Awards, once in 1942 for Best Actor in a Leading Role for Here Fantasy Island (TV Series, 11 episodes from 1978 - 1981), 1978 Comes Mr.
[Show full text]
Folklife Today, Episode 11
Folklife Today August 2019: More Hidden Folklorists Steve Winick: Welcome to the Folklife Today podcast. I’m Stephen Winick, and I’m here with my colleague John Fenn. John Fenn: Greetings, everyone! Steve Winick: We’re folklorists at the American Folklife Center of the Library of Congress. John is the head of Research and Programs, and I'm the Center’s writer and editor, as well as the creator of the blog Folklife Today, which you can find at blogs.loc.gov/folklife John Fenn: And today on the folklife Today Podcast, we're going to talk about more Hidden Folklorists. As Steve explained a few episodes ago, in the idea for "Hidden Folklorists" he was inspired by the book and film "Hidden Figures," and some public events we held at the Library of Congress which focused on that story. The initial idea behind "hidden folklorists" was people whose folklore work was insufficiently recognized for a variety of reasons: either they were women or African Americans at a time when contributions from those groups were generally under-recognized, or just general bad luck or mitigating factors. Steve Winick: and I guess "mitigating factors" might apply to the first Hidden Folklorist we'll talk about this time, a man named Charles J. Finger. John Fenn: Sounds good. So, Steve, you wrote about Charles Finger on the blog. How did you come across him? And just who was Charles J. Finger? SW: well, in brief he was a writer, and I first came across him when I found his book, Frontier Ballads, in a used bookshop in Maryland.
[Show full text]
The Return of the 1950S Nuclear Family in Films of the 1980S
University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2011 The Return of the 1950s Nuclear Family in Films of the 1980s Chris Steve Maltezos University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, and the Film and Media Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Maltezos, Chris Steve, "The Return of the 1950s Nuclear Family in Films of the 1980s" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/3230 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Return of the 1950s Nuclear Family in Films of the 1980s by Chris Maltezos A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Liberal Arts Department of Humanities College Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Daniel Belgrad, Ph.D. Elizabeth Bell, Ph.D. Margit Grieb, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 4, 2011 Keywords: Intergenerational Relationships, Father Figure, insular sphere, mother, single-parent household Copyright © 2011, Chris Maltezos Dedication Much thanks to all my family and friends who supported me through the creative process. I appreciate your good wishes and continued love. I couldn’t have done this without any of you! Acknowledgements I’d like to first and foremost would like to thank my thesis advisor Dr.
[Show full text]
Johnny Guitar (1954, Nicholas Ray, USA)
A Level Film Studies - Focus Film Factsheet Johnny Guitar (1954, Nicholas Ray, USA) heightened colour is used in an expressionistic Component 1: Varieties of way, the colour blue is suppressed. Film and Film-Making (AL) • High level shots of opening as Johnny Component 1 : American Film (AS) Guitar looks down and observes the stage coach robbery. Low level angles of Vienna Core Study Areas: delineating the “upstairs” private space and the Key Elements of Film Form downstairs public space of her saloon. In the Meaning and Response intimate “lie to me” sequence Vienna’s face is mainly in shadow, except for the embrace. The Contexts of Film • High contrast between the interiors, lamplight dark walls and the exteriors with the red Specialist Study Area: Sedona landscape, the waterfall, open spaces. Auteur (AL) Mise-en-Scène Rationale for study • James Sullivan’s flamboyant baroque stylized interiors of the saloon bar built into the cliff but Johnny Guitar can be described as several things: a there are no customers. As in Ray’s other films product of Republic Pictures, a Hollywood Western contrasting spaces with the downstairs “public with the genre’s expected indicators and clichés space” dominated by a huge chandelier. - costume, setting, robberies of stage coaches, gunfights - besides being a “political allegory” made • Emphasis on the elements: air (Johnny in Hollywood during the McCarthy era. It is a film rides to Vienna’s in a ferocious dust storm), that sits firmly in the style of its director Nicholas earth (red rock of the country forms the Ray, transforming a traditionally masculine genre inner wall of the saloon), water (the gang into a stylised flamboyant melodrama with its two ride through the waterfall to their hideout), female antagonists and its “Freudian” subtext.
[Show full text]
IN a LONELY PLACE / 1950 (Matar Ou Não Matar)
CINEMATECA PORTUGUESA–MUSEU DO CINEMA REVISITAR OS GRANDES GÉNEROS: FILM NOIR - NO CORAÇÃO DO NOIR 18 de junho de 2021 IN A LONELY PLACE / 1950 (Matar ou Não Matar) um filme de Nicholas Ray Realização: Nicholas Ray / Argumento: Andrew Solt e Nicholas Ray (não creditado), baseado no romance homónino de Dorothy B.Hughes / Fotografia: Burnett Guffey / Direcção Artística: Robert Peterson / Décors: William Kiernan / Guarda-Roupa: Jean-Louis / Música: George Antheil / Direcção Musical: Morris Stoloff, com orquestração de Ernest Gold / Montagem: Viola Lawrence / Som: Howard Fogett / Interpretação: Humphrey Bogart (Dixon Steele), Gloria Grahame (Laurel Gray), Frank Lovejoy (Brud Nocoli), Art Smith (Mel Lippman), Carl Benton Reid (Capitão Lockner), Jeff Donnell (Sylvia Nicoli), Martha Stewart (Mildred Atkinson), Robert Warwick (Charlie Waterman), Morris Ankrum (Lloyd Brnes), William Ching (Ted Barton), Steven Geray (Paul), Aedda Brooks (a cantora), Alice Talton (Frances), Jack Reynolds (Henry Kesler), Ruth Warren (Effie), Ruth Gillette (Martha), Guy Beech (Swan), Lewis Howard (Junior), etc. Produção: Robert Lord para Santana Pictures (Humphrey Bogart) / Cópia: da Cinemateca Portuguesa–Museu do Cinema, 35mm, preto e branco, legendada em português, 93 minutos / Estreia Mundial: 17 de Maio de 1950 / Estreia em Portugal: 1 de Outubro de 1952, nos Cinemas Odeon e Palácio. _____________________________ "Sempre achou que toda a gente I was born when she kissed me o queria lixar. Na verdade ninguém I died when she left me o queria lixar. Mas quando alguém acha I lived a few weeks que toda a gente o quer lixar, acaba While she loved me sempre por haver uma pessoa que faz esse papel." (poema dito no filme por Dixon Steele (H.Bogart) (Rodney Amateau, conselheiro técnico do filme a propósito de Nicholas Ray) Segundo e último filme de Nicholas Ray para Humphrey Bogart e com Humphrey Bogart, In a Lonely Place é um dos cumes da arte de Ray, uma das suas obras mais trágicas, mas excessivas e mais confessionais.
[Show full text]
Johnny Guitar by Michael Schlesinger
Johnny Guitar By Michael Schlesinger There are very few films—especially from Hollywood studios—that truly deserve to be called sui generis. But “Johnny Guitar” is surely one of them. Even its log line—“a Joan Crawford western”—sounds faintly ludicrous, like “an Ernest Borgnine musi- cal.” But from its humble beginning as a critically-dismissed vanity production, it has grown in stature over the decades, boosted by the likes of Martin Scorsese and Francois Truffaut (who said anyone who didn’t like it should never be permit- ted inside a cinema again, a severe if well -intentioned endorsement), serving as an inspiration for other films, and even being adapted into an award-winning off- Broadway musical in 2004, until it now Joan Crawford gets caught in a stare down between Scott Brady (left) and stands as a unique combination of dispar- Sterling Hayden. Courtesy Library of Congress Collection. ate — and none too friendly — talents man- aging to pull a golden egg out of a very odd duck and that sits right where the railroad is coming through. creating a masterwork that can still leave first-time [She obtained this knowledge by “exchanging confi- viewers gobsmacked some six decades later. After dences” with a fellow in the know.] This doesn’t sit all, name another western that has a massive follow- well with the townsfolk—especially McCambridge — ing among gay people. who see her as a slutty intruder. Sensing that violence may be on the horizon, Joan engages Hayden as pro- Much of its appeal revolves around the fact that it tection.
[Show full text]
Thelma and Louise
Gendering Expectations: Genre and Allegory in Readings of Thelma and Louise Aspasia Kotsopoulos Reflecting on the vociferous attention her film received, screenwriter Callie Khouri says that the social climate into which Thelma and Louise (1991) was released largely explains the furor around it. This was the year of the Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas case, which drew public attention to the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace. In the American media and in politics, women's issues were constantly under scrutiny. "There was such a backlash around the Equal Rights Amendment and the bill on abortion," remembers Khouri. "The atmosphere became so hysterical, like men imagined that women were going to be storming their bathrooms!"' Against this background of hysteria and back- lash, Thelma and Louise emerges as testimony - a document of the times that effectively crystallizes the gender wars of that era. In her book Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women, which documents the antifeminist backlash of the '80s, Susan Faludi describes this cultural phenomenon as a flaring up of hostility towards feminism, occur- ring in periods in which women are seen as making - either real or imagined - headway towards a~tonomy.~Backlash suggests just how much definitions of femininity have become contested in the last two decades. Mia Carter points out that the backlash against Thelma and Louise during its reception was indicative of male critics' anxiety about feminism and their inability to accept that "things have changed," that "womcn, whether Khouri's mythological hero- ines or those among Thelma and Loucse's passionate audience, are no longer silent, passive creatures."? The reaction against feminism and against a film like Thelma and Louise demonstrates the degree to which women's movements have been successful in challenging traditional assumptions.
[Show full text]