DOCSLIB.ORG

The Netherlands: Phase 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Netherlands: Phase 2 DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS THE NETHERLANDS: PHASE 2 REPORT ON THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON COMBATING BRIBERY OF FOREIGN PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS AND THE 1997 RECOMMENDATION ON COMBATING BRIBERY IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS This report was approved and adopted by the Working Group on Bribery in International Business Transactions on 15 June 2006. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................5 A. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................6 1. On-Site Visit ....................................................................................................................6 2. General Observations.......................................................................................................7 a. Economic system.............................................................................................................7 b. Political and legal systems...............................................................................................9 c. Implementation of the Convention and Revised Recommendation...............................10 d. Cases involving the bribery of foreign public officials .................................................11 (i) Investigations, prosecutions and convictions...........................................................11 (ii) Response to the Report of the Independent Inquiry Committee into the UN Oil-For-Food Programme...........................................................................................11 3. Outline of Report ...........................................................................................................12 B. PREVENTION, DETECTION, AND AWARENESS OF FOREIGN BRIBERY ..........12 1. General Efforts to Raise Awareness ..............................................................................12 a. Government initiatives to raise awareness.....................................................................13 (i) Awareness raising and training for civil servants and public agencies....................13 (ii) Awareness raising and training for the private sector..............................................14 b. Private sector initiatives to raise awareness...................................................................14 (i) Business organisations.............................................................................................15 (ii) Major enterprises .....................................................................................................15 (iii) Small and medium-sized enterprises .......................................................................16 (iv) Civil society and trade unions..................................................................................16 2. Reporting Foreign Bribery Offences and Whistleblower Protection.............................17 a. General sources of reporting..........................................................................................17 b. Duty to report crimes .....................................................................................................17 c. Whistleblowing and whistleblower protection ..............................................................17 3. Officially Supported Export Credits..............................................................................19 a. Awareness-raising efforts ..............................................................................................19 b. Detection of foreign bribery ..........................................................................................19 c. Duty to report bribery of foreign public officials ..........................................................20 4. Official Development Assistance ..................................................................................21 a. Awareness-raising efforts ..............................................................................................21 b. Detection of foreign bribery ..........................................................................................22 c. Duty to report bribery of foreign public officials ..........................................................22 5. Foreign Diplomatic Representations .............................................................................23 a. Awareness-raising efforts ..............................................................................................23 b. Detection of foreign bribery and the duty to report bribery of foreign public officials.23 6. The Tax Authorities.......................................................................................................25 a. Tax treatment of bribes..................................................................................................25 (i) Legislation prohibiting tax deductibility..................................................................25 2 (ii) Tax treatment of small facilitation payments...........................................................27 b. Detecting and reporting by the tax authorities...............................................................27 c. Awareness and training..................................................................................................27 7. Accounting and Auditing...............................................................................................28 a. Accounting and auditing standards................................................................................28 b. Reporting obligations.....................................................................................................29 8. Money Laundering.........................................................................................................30 a. Suspicious transaction reporting....................................................................................30 b. Exchange of information ...............................................................................................32 (i) Information exchange with Dutch law enforcement authorities..............................32 (ii) Exchange of information with international authorities ..........................................33 (iii) Obtaining information from financial institutions ...................................................33 c. Sanctions for failure to report ........................................................................................33 C. INVESTIGATION, PROSECUTION, AND SANCTIONING OF FOREIGN BRIBERY........................................................................................................35 1. Investigation ..................................................................................................................35 a. Investigative bodies .......................................................................................................35 (i) The police ................................................................................................................35 (ii) The FIOD-ECD........................................................................................................36 (iii) The Rijksrecherche ..................................................................................................36 (iv) Coordination between law enforcement authorities in corruption cases .................38 b. The Conduct of investigations .......................................................................................39 (i) Commencement of proceedings...............................................................................39 (ii) Investigative techniques...........................................................................................41 c. Mutual legal assistance and extradition.........................................................................43 (i) Mutual legal assistance ............................................................................................43 (ii) Extradition ...............................................................................................................44 (iii) Cooperation with Aruba and the Netherlands Antilles............................................45 2. Prosecution ....................................................................................................................46 a. Prosecutorial bodies and principles of prosecution .......................................................46 (i) The Public Prosecution Service ...............................................................................46 (ii) Decision to prosecute...............................................................................................48 (iii) The Directive on Investigation and Prosecution of Corruption of Officials............49 b. Jurisdiction.....................................................................................................................52 (i) Territorial jurisdiction..............................................................................................52 (ii) Nationality jurisdiction ............................................................................................52 c. Statute of limitations......................................................................................................54 3. The Foreign Bribery Offence.........................................................................................54
Load more

Recommended publications
  • R 1888) Rules for the Financial Supervision on the Countries of Curacao and Sint Maarten (Kingdom Act Financial Supervision Curacao and Sint Maarten)
    Unofficial translation of ‘Memorie van Toelichting Rijkswet financieel toezicht Curaçao en Sint Maarten’. Only the official text in the Dutch language as published in the ‘Staatsblad’ (Dutch Bulletin of Acts, Orders and Decrees) is decisive. No rights can be derived from this translation. Translation Lower Chamber of the States General 2 Parliamentary year 2008 - 2009 32 026 (R 1888) Rules for the financial supervision on the countries of Curacao and Sint Maarten (Kingdom Act financial supervision Curacao and Sint Maarten) No. 3 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM GENERAL 1. Objective and tenor This bill provides for the financial supervision as this will be exercised as per the moment of the change in constitutional relations within the Kingdom with regard to the new countries of Curacao and Sint Maarten. By means of the Decree on Temporary Financial Supervision Netherlands Antilles, Curacao and Sint Maarten, financial supervision has been established on the national budget of the Netherlands Antilles and on the budget of the island territories of Curacao and Sint Maarten. That general State measure becomes null and void not later than on January 1, 2011. This bill shapes the financial supervision in the new constitutional relations for the new countries of Curacao and Sint Maarten. Lower Chamber, Parliamentary Year 2008-2009, 32 026 (R 1888), no. 3 1 Unofficial translation of ‘Memorie van Toelichting Rijkswet financieel toezicht Curaçao en Sint Maarten’. Only the official text in the Dutch language as published in the ‘Staatsblad’ (Dutch Bulletin of Acts, Orders and Decrees) is decisive. No rights can be derived from this translation. Translation The supervision will be exercised by the council of ministers of the Kingdom, while the Board of financial supervision Curacao and Sint Maarten (hereinafter: the Council) will have an observatory and advisory role in this regard.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Emotions Within the Kingdom of the Netherlands Nanneke Quik-Schuijt
    University of Baltimore Journal of International Law Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 3 Volume IV, No. 1 2015-2016 2016 A Case Study: Law and Emotions Within the Kingdom of the Netherlands Nanneke Quik-Schuijt Irene Broekhuijse Open University of the Netherlands, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ubjil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Quik-Schuijt, Nanneke and Broekhuijse, Irene (2016) "A Case Study: Law and Emotions Within the Kingdom of the Netherlands," University of Baltimore Journal of International Law: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ubjil/vol4/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Baltimore Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 LAW AND EMOTIONS.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 3/21/16 6:37 PM\ A Case Study: Law and Emotions Within the Kingdom of the Netherlands Nanneke Quik-Schuijt & Irene Broekhuijse AUTHORS: Nanneke Quik-Schuijt, LLM; Member of the Senate of the Netherlands from June 12th 2007, until June 9th 2015. Before that she served as a judge (dealing with cases involving children), from 1975-1990. Then she became the vice-president of the district court of Utrecht (1990-2007). She was i.a. involved with Kingdom Affairs. Irene Broekhuijse LLM, PhD; Assistant Professor Constitutional and Administrative Law at the Open University of the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Report of the Kingdom of the Netherlands
    INITIAL REPORT OF THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS SUBMITTED UNDER ARTICLE 8, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ON THE INVOLVEMENT OF CHILDREN IN ARMED CONFLICT Introduction The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict (New York, 25 May 2000) was approved for the entire Kingdom of the Netherlands by the Kingdom Act of 18 December 20081 and entered into force for the entire Kingdom on 24 October 2009. The Dutch translation of the Protocol was published in the Dutch Treaty Series 2001, 131. At the time of the ratification the Kingdom of the Netherlands consisted of the Netherlands, the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba. In 2010, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has undergone a process of constitutional reform, which has now reached fruition. The changes concern the Netherlands Antilles, a country that until recently was made up of the islands of Curaçao, Sint Maarten, Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba. The reforms are based on the results of referenda and on decisions taken by representative assemblies about the islands’ future status. The amended Charter for the Kingdom of the Netherlands entered into force on 10 October 2010, on which date the Netherlands Antilles ceased to exist. In the new constitutional structure, Curaçao and Sint Maarten have acquired the status of countries within the Kingdom (like the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba before the changes). Aruba retains the separate country status it has had since 1986. Thus, from 10 October 2010 the Kingdom consists of four, rather than three, equal countries: the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Fisheries & Coastal Zoning in Curaçao
    Sustainable Fisheries & Coastal Zoning in Curaçao Legal & Institutional Assessment of Authorities & Approaches ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN STITUTE J U L Y 2 0 1 6 Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) for the Waitt Institute. The lead authors were Read D. Porter, Kathryn Mengerink, and Bruce Myers, with critical research, drafting, and editorial support provided by Joséphine Woronoff. Additional research and editing support was provided by ELI law clerk Kody Sparks and intern Jose Almario and Waitt Institute’s Tamara Marshall. The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Government of Curaçao, the marine management community, and the Waitt Institute, which provided ELI with the resources and information necessary to complete this assessment. ELI also thanks Hein van Maarschalkerwaart for his translations of key legal documents. ELI is particularly grateful for the thoughtful reviews, invaluable input, and patient guidance provided by Vanessa Bitorina-Eliza, Jeanine Constansia- Kook, Cynthia Devere, Faisal Dilrosun, Gisette Seferina, and Jeffrey Sybesma. The contents of this report, including any errors or omissions, are solely the responsibility of ELI. The authors invite corrections and additions. About ELI Publications ELI publishes Research Reports that present the analysis and conclusions of the policy studies ELI undertakes to improve environmental law and policy. In addition, ELI publishes several journals and reports—including the Environmental Law Reporter, The Environmental Forum, and the National Wetlands Newsletter—and books, which contribute to education of the profession and disseminate diverse points of view and opinions to stimulate a robust and creative exchange of ideas. Those publications, which express opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Institute, its Board of Directors, or funding organizations, exemplify ELI’s commitment to dialogue with all sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • FAQ's Bribe Payers Index 2011
    FAQ’s Bribe Payers Index 2011 1. What is the 2011Bribe Payers Index (BPI)? 2. Which countries are included in the 2011 BPI? 3. How is the BPI 2011 calculated? 4. What does a score, e.g. China’s 6.5, mean? 5. Whose views are reflected in TI’s 2011 BPI? 6. How should companies respond to their country’s ranking in the BPI 2011? 7. How should a government respondto their country’s ranking in the BPI? 8. Can the 2011 BPI be compared to earlier editions of the index? 9. What is the link between the 2011 BPI and the Bribe Payers Survey 2011? 10. Who conducted the Bribe Payers Survey? How was it implemented? 11. What are the sectoral listings published with the 2008 BPI? 12. What is the difference between the BPI and TI’s Corruption Perceptions Index(CPI)? 13. Who works on the BPI at Transparency International? 14. How is the Bribe Payers Survey funded? 1. What is the 2011Bribe Payers Index (BPI)? The BPI is a unique tool capturing the supply side of international bribery, specifically focussing on bribes being paid by the private sector. The BPI 2011 is the fifth edition of the index ranking 28 of the world’s largest economies according to the likelihood of firms from these countries to bribe when doing business abroad. It is based on the results of Transparency International’s Bribe Payers Survey 2011. This asked 3,016 senior business executives in 30 countries around the world for their perceptions of the likelihood of companies, from countries they have business dealings with, toengage in bribery when doing business in their country.
    [Show full text]
  • EUDO Citizenship Observatory
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Cadmus, EUI Research Repository EUDO CITIZENSHIP OBSERVATORY REPORT ON CITIZENSHIP LAW: SURINAME Hamied Ahmadali Ngo Chun Luk September 2015 CITIZENSHIP European University Institute, Florence Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies EUDO Citizenship Observatory Report on Citizenship Law: Suriname Hamied Ahmadali and Ngo Chun Luk September 2015 EUDO Citizenship Observatory Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies in collaboration with Edinburgh University Law School Country Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-CR 2015/17 Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy © 2015 Hamied Ahmadali and Ngo Chun Luk This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. Requests should be addressed to [email protected] The views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union Published in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Research for the EUDO Citizenship Observatory Country Reports has been jointly supported by the European Commission grant agreement JLS/2007/IP/CA/009 EUCITAC and by the British Academy Research Project CITMODES (both projects co-directed by the EUI and the University of Edinburgh). The financial support from these projects is gratefully acknowledged. For information about the Project please visit the project website at http://eudo-citizenship.eu Citizenship Law Suriname 1 Hamied Ahmadali and Ngo Chun Luk 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Bribe Payers Index 2008
    BRIBE TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL TRANSPARENCY 2008 PAYERS INDEX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was written by Juanita Riaño and Robin Hodess, with data analysis by Juanita Riaño. The report’s authors would like to thank all those in the Transparency International movement who have contributed their time to evaluating the Bribe Payers Index over the past two years and who have encouraged and inspired us to work towards a new Bribe Payers Survey and Bribe Payers Index in 2008. The 2008 Bribe Payers Survey and the 2008 Bribe Payers Index are made possible by the generous support of Ernst & Young, the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD). We are also grateful to the many organisations that provide general funding to Transparency International’s Secretariat, supporting our global and national measurement tools. Transparency International does not endorse an organisation’s or a company’s policies by accepting its financial support, and does not involve any of its supporters in the management of its projects. For more on Transparency International’s sources of funding, please see www.transparency.org/support_us. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL International Secretariat Alt Moabit 96 10559 Berlin, Germany Tel: + 49-30-34 38 200 Fax: +49-30-34 70 39 12 [email protected] www.transparency.org ISBN: 978-3-935711-10-4 © 2008 Transparency International. All rights reserved. Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of December 2008. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Corruption in Mexico
    MEASURING CORRUPTION IN MEXICO Jose I. Rodriguez-Sanchez, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Research Fellow in International Trade, Mexico Center December 2018 © 2018 by the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, papers are reviewed by outside experts before they are released. However, the research and views expressed in this paper are those of the individual researcher(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. Jose I. Rodriguez-Sanchez, Ph.D. “Measuring Corruption in Mexico” Measuring Corruption in Mexico Introduction Corruption is a complex problem affecting all societies, and it has many different causes and consequences. Its consequences include negative impacts on economic growth and development, magnifying effects on poverty and inequality, and corrosive effects on legal systems and governance institutions. Corruption in the form of embezzlement or misappropriation of public funds, for example, diverts valuable economic resources that could be used on education, health care, infrastructure, or food security, while simultaneously eroding faith in the government. Calculating and measuring the impact of corruption and its tangible and intangible costs are essential to combating it. But before corruption can be measured, it must first be defined. Decision-makers have often resorted to defining corruption in a certain area or location by listing specific acts that they consider corrupt. Such definitions, however, are limited because they are context-specific and depend on how individual governments decide to approach the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Transparency International
    Evaluation Department Evaluation of Transparency International Report 8/2010 – Evaluation Norad Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation P.O.Box 8034 Dep, NO-0030 Oslo Ruseløkkveien 26, Oslo, Norway Phone: +47 22 24 20 30 Fax: +47 22 24 20 31 Photos: From Bangladesh by G. M. B. Akash Design: Agendum See Design Print: 07 Xpress AS, Oslo ISBN: 978-82-7548-545-6 Evaluation of Transparency International February 2011 Channel Research “Responsibility for the contents and presentation of findings and recommendations rest with the evaluation team. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with those of Norad”. Acknowledgements This report has been commissioned by the Evaluation Department of the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad). The evaluation was managed by Channel Research, and was carried out by the following team: Emery Brusset (Team Leader) John Bray (Senior Expert, with a focus on the private sector) Marina Buch Kristensen (Senior Expert, with a focus on civil society) Anne-Lise Klausen (Quality Assurance Expert and Consultation Facilitator) Jups Kluyskens (Senior Expert, with a focus on the public sector) Radwan Siddiq (Institutional Development Expert) The team would like to thank the independent consultative group and senior man- agement of Transparency International, who provided early oral feedback to the emerging findings, as well as Mr Eirik G. Jansen from the Evaluation Department, who gave us useful guidance regarding evaluation methods. Particular gratitude is owed to those who took their time to meet us in interviews and to share their documents, at the fifteen chapters we visited and at the Transparency International Secretariat in Berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Netherlands Nationality Act (As in Force on 8 February 2015)
    Netherlands Nationality Act (as in force on 8 February 2015) CHAPTER 1. General Provisions Article 1 1. For the purposes of this Kingdom Act and the provisions relying thereon: a. ‘Our Minister’ means Our Minister of Justice in his capacity as Minister of the Kingdom; b. ‘person of full age’ means a person who has attained the age of eighteen or has married before attaining that age; c. ‘mother’ means the woman with whom the child has a family relationship of the first ascending degree, other than by adoption; d. ‘father’ means the man with whom the child has a family relationship of the first ascending degree, other than by adoption; e. ‘alien’ means a person who does not possess Netherlands nationality; f. ‘stateless person’ means a person who is not regarded as a national by any State under its legislation; g. ‘admission’: permission by the competent authority with respect to a lasting place of residence of an alien in the European part of the Netherlands, Aruba, Curaçao, Sint Maarten or the public bodies of Bonaire, Sint Eustasius and Saba; h. ‘principal place of residence’: the place where a person has his or her actual domicile. 2. Without prejudice to the application of Section 15A, under a, of this Act: a. a spouse must also be taken to mean the partner in a partnership registered in the Netherlands, as well as the partner in a partnership registered abroad which is recognized pursuant to Articles 2 and 3 of the Act on conflict rules regarding registered partnerships (Wet conflictenrecht geregistreerd partnerschap), and b.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Corruption
    TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL SUMMER SCHOOL, 08/07/2014 Santhosh Srinivasan, Researcher, Transparency International, Berlin GLOBAL RESEARCH PUBLIC SECTOR CORRUPTION PETTY CORRUPTION BUSINESS CORRUPTION POLITICAL CORRUPTION CORRUPTION MEASUREMENT 1.Corruption Perceptions Index 2.Global Corruption Barometer 3.Private Sector Corruption Tools 4.National Integrity System Assessments CORRUPTION PERCEPTIONS INDEX An aggregate Index that scores and ranks 177 countries and territories from around the world on the perceived level of corruption in the public sector. Corruption Perceptions Index 2013 Published 3rd December 2013 Calculated using an updated methodology Presented on a scale of 0-100 CPI – METHODOLOGY • 13 different data sources • Rescale each data source to 0-100 scale • The average of all sources for that country • Calculate the uncertainty CPI – DATA SOURCES AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC RISK GOVERNANCE RATINGS 2012 CONSULTANCY ASIAN INTELLIGENCE 2013 BERTELSMANN FOUNDATION SUSTAINABLE GOVERNANCE POLITICAL RISK SERVICES INDICATORS 2014 INTERNATIONAL COUNTRY RISK GUIDE BERTELSMANN FOUNDATION TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL BRIBE TRANSFORMATION INDEX 2014 PAYERS SURVEY 2011 ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT WORLD BANK - COUNTRY POLICY AND COUNTRY RISK RATINGS INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT 2012 FREEDOM HOUSE NATIONS IN TRANSIT WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM EXECUTIVE 2013 OPINION SURVEY (EOS) 2013 GLOBAL INSIGHT COUNTRY RISK WORLD JUSTICE PROJECT RULE OF LAW RATINGS INDEX 2013 IMD WORLD COMPETITIVENESS YEARBOOK 2013 CPI 2013 - RESULTS The perceived levels of public sector corruption in 177 countries/territories around the world. 70% of countries score less than 50 out of 100 CPI 2013 - RESULTS CPI 2013 – SSA 1. CPI 2013 – THE TOP Denmark and New Zealand tie for first place with scores of 91, helped by strong access to information systems and rules governing the behaviour of those in public positions.
    [Show full text]
  • Download "The Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands 2008"
    The Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands 2008 Published by the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, Constitutional Affairs and Legislation Division in collaboration with the Translation Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Boekje Grondwet 2008 SL Engels.indd 1 22-09-2008 11:14:18 2 Boekje Grondwet 2008 SL Engels.indd 2 22-09-2008 11:14:18 Contents CHAPTER 1 Fundamental rights 5 CHAPTER 2 Government 10 CHAPTER 3 The States General 15 CHAPTER 4 Council of State, Court of Audit, 19 National Ombudsman and permanent advisory bodies CHAPTER 5 Legislation and administration 21 CHAPTER 6 The administration of justice 26 CHAPTER 7 Provinces, municipalities, water boards and 28 other public bodies CHAPTER 8 Revision of the Constitution 31 Additional articles 33 Articles of the 1972 and 1983 text of the Constitution 35 which are to remain in force for the time being 3 Boekje Grondwet 2008 SL Engels.indd 3 22-09-2008 11:14:18 4 Boekje Grondwet 2008 SL Engels.indd 4 22-09-2008 11:14:18 CHAPTER 1 Fundamental rights Article 1 All persons in the Netherlands shall be treated equally in equal circumstances. Discrimination on the grounds of religion, belief, political opinion, race or sex or on any other grounds whatsoever shall not be permitted. Article 2 1. Dutch nationality shall be regulated by Act of Parliament. 2. The admission and expulsion of aliens shall be regulated by Act of Parliament. 3. Extradition may take place only pursuant to a treaty. Further regulations concerning extradition shall be laid down by Act of Parliament.
    [Show full text]