Domestic Policy Priorities Why Did Johnson Win?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Domestic Policy Priorities Why Did Johnson Win? Contents: DOMESTIC POLICY Why did Johnson win? PRIORITIES Domestic policy priorities 1) Infrastructure What next for Brexit? A self-styled ‘infrastructure The future of the Union revolution’ will see £100 bn in Where next for Labour? additional spending going The new parliament at a glance towards improving transport in the north and the midlands. Five new Tory MPs to look out for Whilst a decision on the future of HS2 is expected, further detail on other transport priorities Where next for Labour? WHY DID JOHNSON WIN? could be revealed in the The new parliament at a glance National Infrastructure Strategy, Boris Johnson’s share of the vote was just one percentage rumoured to be published Five new Tory MPs to look out for point higher than Theresa May’s. Instead of a hung alongside the Budget expected parliament, it translated into a majority of 80, and victory shortly after Brexit. in seats including Tony Blair’s former seat of Sedgefield 2) Business and Dennis Skinner’s Bolsover seat. A key Government mission in a Confident of a five-year term if he wants it, this new post-Brexit future will be to political geography will have significant impact on Boris’ make Britain ‘the best country in agenda . In 2024 he will have to account for his record to the world’ to start and grow a the voters in Britain’s de-industrialising heartlands. No business. Party rhetoric has thus wonder his victory speech talked about the NHS and far centred on attracting growth infrastructure investment alongside Brexit. in the technology, financial Analysis of how Boris smashed the ‘red wall’ is going to be services and creative industry key to understanding what he and his competitors need to sectors and, despite a freeze do to succeed electorally in the future. Labour won by 20 rather than cut to corporation points in cities, but lost everywhere else. It is going to be tax, businesses will be bolstered increasingly important to understand the interests of by a reduction in business rates people who don’t live in the big cities where most of our and supported by a new £3 big companies are based. billion National Skills Fund. The Corbynite analysis is that the divide was all about Brexit, The Corbynite analysis is that the divide was all about Brexit, but transparently it wasn’t. Labour was down 10 3) Housing points in strong Leave areas, but it was also down 6 The Tories will look to amend points in strong Remain areas. Brexit cannot explain why planning rules to boost local Jeremy Corbyn was less trusted than Boris Johnson on infrastructure and house building the NHS; and when Lord Ashcroft asked people what and support the development of most put them off voting Labour the number 1 answer – more affordable housing. Leave or Remain – was Jeremy Corbyn. Delta Poll found Leasehold reform will aim to something similar. make housing fairer for The result shows the importance of trust and credibility. consumers, alongside better The video link below takes you to a clip from our focus protections for renters. group with swing voters near Stoke. Who wouldn’t want 4) Environment free broadband? The problem is that Labour was not trusted to deliver it. During the campaign the Prime Minister was keen to brandish his green credentials and this will likely continue. A pathway to achieving net zero by 2050, which will have a direct impact on businesses, will be a key priority alongside publishing an Energy White Paper. The Tories will also look to put their proposals on plastics and recycling into primary legislation. In contrast, Boris effectively only made one pledge and he was utterly believable on it – he will get Brexit done. 5) Health On that note… The Tories have committed to billions in additional funding, to new hospitals and to thousands WHAT NEXT FOR BREXIT? more doctors and GPs. Keen to demonstrate his post-austerity The UK will be leaving the EU on 31 January 2020. But credentials, the Prime Minister’s that’s just the first step of ‘getting Brexit done’ – what success in proving this will rely comes next, and will it all be over by this time next year? heavily on his ability to inject Clearly, Johnson’s large majority and personal mandate funding into the NHS, and prove will give him a lot of leeway in getting his preferred form he is delivering for the health of Brexit. His statements so far suggest he wants a service. relatively narrow UK-EU FTA which prioritises trade and regulatory sovereignty over a more comprehensive arrangement such as May’s Chequers plan, however the new political reality may mean that changes. Such an FTA would preserve tariff and quota free goods trade, but it would increase costs for business in the form of regulatory obligations and associated checks – these would be particularly felt by the advanced manufacturing and services sectors (the Government’s own figures expect an FTA Brexit would still leave GDP 5% lower than staying in). Some now hope that, not beholden to the hard Brexiteer ERG bloc, Johnson could again pivot and embrace a softer Brexit. However, such an arrangement would be a lot more complicated, entail tricky trade-offs and take a lot longer to negotiate with an EU that is as weary of Brexit as the UK electorate. Could an FTA be negotiated within 11 months? This timetable is certainly very ambitious, not least since the relationship will also need to encompass non-economic issues such as security cooperation. However, a relatively narrow, goods-focused FTA could feasibly be agreed in this time, although the EU’s price will also be potentially painful compromises on level playing field provisions and fishing rights in UK waters. Either way, it is unlikely Johnson will take up the option to extend the transition period by the 1 July deadline, having promised not to do so – this means a no deal Brexit on 31 December 2020, while unlikely, cannot be ruled out. That said, if necessary, some kind of further extension mechanism could probably be manufactured closer to the deadline as both sides want a deal. It is also likely specific transition arrangements will be required to phase-in the new ‘points-based’ immigration system and the new Northern Irish dual customs regime. THE FUTURE OF THE UNION The results in Scotland and Northern Ireland – which saw a surge in support for the SNP and nationalists win more seats than unionists in the Province for the first time – pose a range of constitutional challenges for the Government. Winning 48 seats has convinced the SNP they have a renewed mandate for independence, with the party expected to publish a new legal case for a second referendum next week. The anticipated rejection of such a request by a Tory Government with only six Scottish MPs and a distinctly English voice suits the Nationalist argument that Scotland suffers from a democratic deficit and makes the terrain difficult for pro-Union parties in the long-term. A crumb of comfort for dejected unionists is that the pro-independence share of the vote is still, despite Brexit and Boris, just over 45% which is the same figure the losing Yes side achieved at the 2014 poll. In Northern Ireland, the DUP’s losses can be attributed to tactical voting among Remain voters and selective collaboration between the SDLP and Sinn Fein. Despite this, questions are likely to be asked of Arlene Foster’s leadership given she has presided over the loss of unionist hegemony at the devolved Stormont assembly and now Westminster. However, this should not be taken as an indication that a united Ireland is imminent. Sinn Fein’s vote share fell more than any other Northern Irish party including the DUP, while the cross-community Alliance party increased its share most. Rather than categorising Ulster’s politics in traditional orange v green terms, it is clear that an incipient middle ground is actually growing increasingly weary of the constitutional question. WHERE NEXT FOR LABOUR? In the face of last night’s disappointing results for Labour, Jeremy Corbyn has said he will not lead the Party into the next election but will stay on as Leader during a ‘process of reflection’ . Further details of the timetable for his departure and the election of a successor are yet to be confirmed. Labour frontbenchers were quick to pin the blame for last night’s results on a Brexit-focused election, seeking to deflect criticism away from Jeremy Corbyn and his radical policy agenda . As the ground is laid for an upcoming leadership battle, the debate on why Labour lost will continue in the days and weeks ahead. Contenders to succeed Corbyn are already being discussed, with candidates ranging across the Labour Party. Current Shadow Cabinet members Emily Thornberry, Keir Starmer, Rebecca Long-Bailey and Angela Rayner are all tipped to run, whilst prominent backbenchers Yvette Cooper and Jess Phillips are also potentially in the frame. One possible key challenger from the left, Laura Pidcock, lost her seat overnight. Whoever puts their hat in the ring, we can be sure a fierce debate over the Labour Party’s heart and soul is on the horizon. As Labour considers last night’s results and reflects on how to rebuild, a new intake of MPs will arrive in Westminster. Many, including the leadership hopefuls, will be looking for issues to champion or campaigns to throw their weight behind. FIVE NEW TORY MPS TO LOOK OUT FOR NEW PARLIAMENT 1. Anthony Browne (South Cambridgeshire) AT A GLANCE Staunch Brexiteer replaces troublesome Remainer Whilst a record 220 women The Tory rebels, who frustrated May and then Boris’ have been elected to attempts to pass Brexit legislation, have been replaced Parliament, two-thirds of largely by true Brexit believers.
Recommended publications
  • Order Paper No.4: Part 1
    Saturday 19 October 2019 Order Paper No.4: Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA: CHAMBER 9.30am Prayers Afterwards Statement by the Prime Minister; other Ministerial Statements (if any) Until any hour Section 1(1)(a) of the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 and Section 13(1)(b) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (Motion) Until any hour Section 1(2)(a) of the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 (Motion) 2 Saturday 19 October 2019 OP No.4: Part 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS PART 1: BUSINESS TODAY 3 Chamber 6 Written Statements 7 Announcements 13 Further Information PART 2: FUTURE BUSINESS 16 A. Calendar of Business 24 B. Remaining Orders and Notices Notes: Item marked [R] indicates that a member has declared a relevant interest. Saturday 19 October 2019 OP No.4: Part 1 BUSINESS Today: CHAMBER 3 BUSINESS TODAY: CHAMBER 9.30am Prayers Followed by STATEMENTS Statement by the Prime Minister Other Ministerial Statements (if any) BUSINESS OF THE DAY 1. SECTION 1(1)(a) OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) (NO. 2) ACT 2019 AND SECTION 13(1)(b) OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (WITHDRAWAL) ACT 2018 Until any hour (Order of 17 October and Standing Order No. 16(2)) The Prime Minister That, in light of the new deal agreed with the European Union, which enables the United Kingdom to respect the result of the referendum on its membership of the European Union and to leave the European Union on 31 October with a deal, and for the purposes of section 1(1)(a) of the European Union (Withdrawal) (No.
    [Show full text]
  • Father of the House Sarah Priddy
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 06399, 17 December 2019 By Richard Kelly Father of the House Sarah Priddy Inside: 1. Seniority of Members 2. History www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 06399, 17 December 2019 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Seniority of Members 4 1.1 Determining seniority 4 Examples 4 1.2 Duties of the Father of the House 5 1.3 Baby of the House 5 2. History 6 2.1 Origin of the term 6 2.2 Early usage 6 2.3 Fathers of the House 7 2.4 Previous qualifications 7 2.5 Possible elections for Father of the House 8 Appendix: Fathers of the House, since 1901 9 3 Father of the House Summary The Father of the House is a title that is by tradition bestowed on the senior Member of the House, which is nowadays held to be the Member who has the longest unbroken service in the Commons. The Father of the House in the current (2019) Parliament is Sir Peter Bottomley, who was first elected to the House in a by-election in 1975. Under Standing Order No 1, as long as the Father of the House is not a Minister, he takes the Chair when the House elects a Speaker. He has no other formal duties. There is evidence of the title having been used in the 18th century. However, the origin of the term is not clear and it is likely that different qualifications were used in the past. The Father of the House is not necessarily the oldest Member.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates House of Commons Official Report General Committees
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee CHARITIES (PROTECTION AND SOCIAL INVESTMENT) BILL [LORDS] Fifth Sitting Thursday 7 January 2016 CONTENTS New clauses considered. Bill, as amended, to be reported. Written evidence reported to the House. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDON – THE STATIONERY OFFICE LIMITED PBC (Bill 069) 2015 - 2016 No proofs can be supplied. Corrigenda slips may be published with Bound Volume editions. Corrigenda that Members suggest should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Monday 11 January 2016 STRICT ADHERENCE TO THIS ARRANGEMENT WILL GREATLY FACILITATE THE PROMPT PUBLICATION OF THE BOUND VOLUMES OF PROCEEDINGS IN GENERAL COMMITTEES © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2016 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 105 Public Bill Committee7 JANUARY 2016 Charities (Protection and Social 106 Investment) Bill [Lords] The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: †FABIAN HAMILTON,MRS ANNE MAIN † Churchill, Jo (Bury St Edmunds) (Con) Stevens, Jo (Cardiff Central) (Lab) † Haigh, Louise (Sheffield, Heeley) (Lab) † Streeting, Wes (Ilford North) (Lab) † Jenrick, Robert (Newark) (Con) † Throup, Maggie (Erewash) (Con) † Johnson, Gareth (Dartford) (Con) † Tugendhat, Tom (Tonbridge and Malling) (Con) † Kyle, Peter (Hove) (Lab)
    [Show full text]
  • Future Oral Questions As of Mon 8 Feb 2021
    Published: Monday 8 February 2021 Questions for oral answer on a future day (Future Day Orals) Questions for oral answer on a future day as of Monday 8 February 2021. The order of these questions may be varied in the published call lists. [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Tuesday 9 February Oral Questions to the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Jack Lopresti (Filton and Bradley Stoke): What steps his Department is taking to support UK research and development. (912039) David Mundell (Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale): What assessment his Department has made of the effect of the closure of post offices operated by CJ Lang & Son Ltd on the post office network in Scotland. (912040) Navendu Mishra (Stockport): What recent discussions he has had with (a) employers and (b) trade unions on the use of dismiss and re-engage tactics in negotiations with employees. (912042) Jason McCartney (Colne Valley): What steps his Department is taking to support businesses during the covid-19 outbreak. (912043) Rachel Hopkins (Luton South): What steps his Department is taking to support the hospitality industry during the covid-19 outbreak. (912044) John Lamont (Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk): What steps his Department is taking to support the luxury textile sector during the covid-19 outbreak. (912045) Tonia Antoniazzi (Gower): What recent steps he has taken to strengthen and update his Department's guidance to employers on covid-secure working. (912046) Andy Carter (Warrington South): What steps his Department is taking to achieve net zero emissions by 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Generational Divide Will Split Cult of Corbyn the Internal Contradictions Between the Youthful Idealists and Cynical Old Trots Are Becoming Increasingly Exposed
    The Times, 26th September 2017: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/generational-divide- will-split-cult-of-corbyn-c0sbn70mv Generational divide will split cult of Corbyn The internal contradictions between the youthful idealists and cynical old Trots are becoming increasingly exposed Rachael Sylvester A graffiti artist is spray-painting a wall when I arrive at The World Transformed festival, organised by Jeremy Corbyn’s supporters in Momentum. Inside, clay-modelling is under way in a creative workshop that is exploring “the symbiotic relationship between making and thinking”. A “collaborative quilt” hangs in the “creative chaos corner” next to a specially commissioned artwork celebrating the NHS. The young, mainly female volunteers who are staffing the event talk enthusiastically about doing politics in a different way and creating spaces where people can come together to discuss new ideas. It is impossible to ignore the slightly cult-like atmosphere: one member of the audience is wearing a T-shirt printed with the slogan “Corbyn til I die”. But this four-day festival running alongside the official Labour Party conference in Brighton has far more energy and optimism than most political events. There have been two late-night raves, sessions on “acid Corbynism”, and a hackathon, seeking to harness the power of the geeks to solve technological problems. With its own app, pinging real-time updates to followers throughout the day, and a glossy pastel-coloured brochure, the Momentum festival has an upbeat, modern feel. As well as sunny optimism there is a darker, bullying side Then I go to a packed session on “Radical Democracy and Twenty- First Century Socialism”.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Members' Interests
    Tees Valley Combined Authority: Register of Members’ Interests As a Member of the Tees Valley Combined Authority, I declare that I have the following disclosable pecuniary and/or non-pecuniary interests. (Please state ‘None’ where appropriate, do not leave any boxes blank). Name: …… Jonathan Munby ……………………………………………… NOTIFICATION OF CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES Each Member shall review their individual register of interests before each, submitting any necessary revisions to the Monitoring Officer at the start of the meeting. Any recorded interests relevant to the meeting should also be declared at this point. Even if a meeting has not taken place a Member must, within 28 clear working days of becoming aware of any change to the interests specified below, provide written notification to the Monitoring Officer, of that change. *SPOUSE/PARTNER – In the notice below my spouse or partner means anyone who meets the definition in the Localism Act, i.e. my spouse or civil partner, or a person with whom I am living as a spouse or a person with whom I am living as if we are civil partners, and I am aware that that person has the interest having carried out a reasonable level of investigation. Where your spouse or partner has recently been involved in any activity which would have been declarable, this should be mentioned, with the date the activity ended. SECTION 1 ANY EMPLOYMENT, OFFICE, TRADE, MYSELF SPOUSE/PARTNER* PROFESSION OR VOCATION CARRIED ON FOR PROFIT OR GAIN 1.1 Name of: Teesside University Middlesbrough Council o your employer(s) o any business carried on by you o any other role in which you receive remuneration(this includes remunerated roles such as councillors).
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report Monday, 9 November 2020 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Monday, 9 November 2020 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 9 November 2020 and the information is correct at the time of publication (07:12 P.M., 09 November 2020). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 8 Licensed Premises: BUSINESS, ENERGY AND Coronavirus 20 INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 8 Life Sciences 20 Beer: Small Businesses 8 Low Pay: Coronavirus 21 Bounce Back Loan Scheme: Nuclear Power 22 Sussex 8 Nuclear Power Stations: Business: Coronavirus 9 Finance 22 Carbon Emissions 11 Nuclear Reactors 22 Consumer Goods: Safety 11 Overseas Students: EU Coronavirus: Disease Control 12 Nationals 23 Coronavirus: Remote Working 12 Personal Care Services: Coronavirus 23 Coronavirus: Social Distancing 13 Political Parties: Coronavirus 24 Debenhams: Coronavirus 13 Post Office: Legal Costs 24 Economic Situation: Coronavirus 14 Post Offices: ICT 25 Electronic Commerce: Renewable Energy 25 Regulation 14 Research: Public Consultation 27 Energy Supply 15 Research: Publishing 27 Energy: Meters 15 Retail Trade: Coventry 28 Erasmus+ Programme and Shipping: Tees Valley 28 Horizon Europe 16 Solar power: Faversham 29 Fireworks: Safety 16 Unemployment: Coronavirus 29 Green Homes Grant Scheme 17 Weddings: Coronavirus 30 Horizon Europe 18 Wind Power 31 Housing: Energy 19 Hydrogen 20 CABINET OFFICE 31 Musicians: Coronavirus 44 Ballot Papers: Visual Skateboarding: Coronavirus 44 Impairment 31
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2019: Mps in Wales
    Etholiad Cyffredinol 2019: Aelodau Seneddol yng Nghymru General Election 2019: MPs in Wales 1 Plaid Cymru (4) 5 6 Hywel Williams 2 Arfon 7 Liz Saville Roberts 2 10 Dwyfor Meirionnydd 3 4 Ben Lake 8 12 Ceredigion Jonathan Edwards 14 Dwyrain Caerfyrddin a Dinefwr / Carmarthen East and Dinefwr 9 10 Ceidwadwyr / Conservatives (14) Virginia Crosbie Fay Jones 1 Ynys Môn 13 Brycheiniog a Sir Faesyfed / Brecon and Radnorshire Robin Millar 3 Aberconwy Stephen Crabb 15 11 Preseli Sir Benfro / Preseli Pembrokeshire David Jones 4 Gorllewin Clwyd / Clwyd West Simon Hart 16 Gorllewin Caerfyrddin a De Sir Benfro / James Davies Carmarthen West and South Pembrokeshire 5 Dyffryn Clwyd / Vale of Clwyd David Davies Rob Roberts 25 6 Mynwy / Monmouth Delyn Jamie Wallis Sarah Atherton 33 8 Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr / Bridgend Wrecsam / Wrexham Alun Cairns 34 Simon Baynes Bro Morgannwg / Vale of Glamorgan 9 12 De Clwyd / Clwyd South 13 Craig Williams 11 Sir Drefaldwyn / Montgomeryshire 14 15 16 25 24 17 23 21 22 26 18 20 30 27 19 32 28 31 29 39 40 36 33 Llafur / Labour (22) 35 37 Mark Tami 38 7 34 Alyn & Deeside / Alun a Glannau Dyfrdwy Nia Griffith Gerald Jones 17 23 Llanelli Merthyr Tudful a Rhymni / Merthyr Tydfil & Rhymney Tonia Antoniazzi Nick Smith Chris Bryant 18 24 30 Gwyr / Gower Blaenau Gwent Rhondda Geraint Davies Nick Thomas-Symonds Chris Elmore Jo Stevens 19 26 31 37 Gorllewin Abertawe / Swansea West Tor-faen / Torfaen Ogwr / Ogmore Canol Caerdydd / Cardiff Central Carolyn Harris Chris Evans Stephen Kinnock Stephen Doughty 20 27 32 38 Dwyrain Abertawe /
    [Show full text]
  • Kent Rail Strategy 2021 Call- In
    Direct Dial/Ext: 03000 416478 e-mail: [email protected] Ask for: Anna Taylor Date: 8 February 2021 Dear Member SCRUTINY COMMITTEE - WEDNESDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2021 I am now able to enclose, for consideration at next Wednesday, 10 February 2021 meeting of the Scrutiny Committee, the following written submissions relating to the Kent Rail Strategy 2021 call- in. These were unavailable when the agenda was printed. Agenda Item No B1 Decision 21/00011 - Kent Rail Strategy 2021 (Pages 1 - 16) 1. Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association Pages 1-2 2. West Malling Parish Council to KCC Page 3 3. Statement from Maidstone Borough Council Page 5 4. Question to the Leader, Sir Paul Carter, by Ian Chittenden at County Council meeting on 15 March 2018 and Sir Paul's response. Page 7 5. Letter from the Secretary of State for Transport, Chris Grayling, dated 13 October 2018 reaffirming commitment to provide 2 hourly Thameslink service from Maidstone East to City of London with journey times comparable to High Speed services from Maidstone West (60 minutes). Pages 9 - 10 6. Article published by Helen Grant, MP for Maidstone & The Weald, on 15 December 2020 regarding recent meeting with Rail Minister, also attended by Michael Payne and the Leader of Maidstone BC, Cllr. Martin Cox. Pages 11 - 12 7. Email Correspondence between Michael Payne and Roger Johnson, Vice Chair of Sevenoaks Rail Travellers Association Pages 13 - 16 Yours sincerely Benjamin Watts General Counsel This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item B1 SEVENOAKS RAIL TRAVELLERS ASSOCIATION (www.srta.org.uk) Maidstone East – Does the DfT’s Proposal deliver for Kent? An Assessment for KCC.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Jun—Jul 2017
    B Our Magazine is published every Jun—Jul other month and is freely available to 2017 our members www.cenca.co.uk Stay ‘In Touch’ with the ISSUE 41 Corby & E Northants Conservative Association Published by RM Boyd on behalf of Corby & E Northants Conservative Association and Tom Pursglove, all at CENCA, Cottingham Road, Corby, NN17 1SZ Printed by Contract Printing Services Ltd., Unit J, Cavendish Courtyard, Sallow Road, Weldon North Industrial Estate, Corby, NN17 5DZ WE NEED TO WIN THIS ELECTION BOTH LOCALLY AND NATIONALLY TO SECURE THE BEST POSSIBLE DEAL FROM BREXIT Our future prosperity, our place in the world, Getting Brexit right matters because it will and our standard of living all depend on decide whether or not our children have a getting the Brexit deal right. safe, secure and prosperous future. The only way you can ensure we have the And with your help, together we can make it strong and stable leadership to get this work right is by backing me, and voting for the We will: local Conservative candidate, Tom • Take back control of our borders, our laws Pursglove, in the Corby & East Northants and our money constituency. • Sign new trade deals around the world with new friends and old partners • Ensure we leave in a smooth and orderly way, and that Brexit works for the whole of the United Kingdom • Provide as much clarity as possible at every Theresa May stage of the process, while maintaining a Prime Minister strong negotiating hand Conservative Association Chairman’s Report to Members Ray Boyd (Agent and Deputy Chairman—Membership) May 2017 elected and he has been true to this.
    [Show full text]
  • Dennis Skinner
    DENNIS SKINNER UK HOUSE OF COMMONS THE BEAST OF BOLSOVER He’s a conviction politician, he’s an unrepentant, old school socialist, he represents the place where he grew up in Derbyshire and he once did a real job for a living (he was a coalminer) – any one of those qualifications makes Dennis Skinner a rare specimen in British politics these days. He once said that he would retire at the age of 65, that to do otherwise would be to ‘take another man’s job’, So far, he’s gone 18 years beyond that, but nobody could ever accuse him of riding the gravy train: Skinner has arguably had the best attendance record in the House and yet frequently listed as claiming the least in expenses. He’s always spurned paid trips abroad, anything smacking of patronage and even the House of Commons bars – he prefers to meet visitors in the canteen. He’s also democracy’s most prolific and vituperative heckler and his sneering harangues have become legendary. Sometimes they’re funny; often they’re just bile and battery acid. He called one former cabinet minister ‘slimy’ and ‘a wart’ and another a ‘pompous sod’. He accused Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of being the sort who would bribe judges ‘to save her own neck’. Skinner’s staunchly against the monarchy, and the annual opening of Parliament has always triggered a response – usually directed at ‘Black Rod’ the liveried official sent to summon MPs to the House of Lords for the Queen’s speech. When a new Black Rod, the diminutive retired general, Michael Willcocks, made his first appearance, Skinner cried: ‘They’ve short-changed us! He’s nowt but a midget!’ For decades he was something of a hate figure for everyone who didn’t share his politics.
    [Show full text]