DOCSLIB.ORG

Formal Minutes of the Science and Technology Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Formal Minutes of the Science and Technology Committee Science and Technology Committee: Formal Minutes 2019–21 1 Formal Minutes of the Science and Technology Committee Wednesday 4 March 2020 Members present: Greg Clark, in the Chair Aaron Bell Mark Logan Chris Clarkson Carol Monaghan Katherine Fletcher Graham Stringer Andrew Griffith Zarah Sultana Darren Jones 1. Declarations of interest Members declared their interests, in accordance with the resolution of the House of 13 July 1992. (For details of declaration of interests, see Appendix.) 2. An introduction to Research and Innovation Policy The Committee considered this matter. 3. Confidentiality and Privilege The Committee considered this matter. 4. Committee working practices Resolved, That the Committee examine witnesses in public, except where it otherwise orders. Resolved, That the witnesses who submit written evidence to the Committee are authorised to publish it on their own account in accordance with Standing Order No. 135, subject always to the discretion of the Chair or where the Committee orders otherwise. Resolved, That the Committee shall not consider individual cases. Resolved, That the following matters be delegated to the Chair: • Agreeing the circulated agenda for Committee meetings; • Engaging in correspondence on Committee matters which is not sufficiently significant to require approval by the Committee or is of a routine nature; • Arranging informal meetings in Westminster on matters relating to the Committee’s remit; • Authorising the issue of press notices about forthcoming evidence sessions, new inquiries and Reports; 2 Science and Technology: Formal Minutes 2019–21 • Subject to a degree of prior negotiation, proposing Reports to the Liaison Committee for debate in Westminster Hall; and • Taking decisions which are consequential on matters already decided by the Committee or which are urgent. Resolved, That in the 2019–21 session, where the Committee receives evidence, or sends or receives correspondence which, in the Chair’s judgement, merits publication by the Committee before it will meet again, the Chair shall have discretion to report it to the House for publication, provided that i) the evidence or correspondence concerned shall have been circulated to the Committee and ii) all members shall have been given the opportunity to object to such publication before it takes place. 5. Standards of Service The Committee considered this matter. 6. Future Programme Resolved, That the Committee take evidence on Budget 2020: research and innovation spending. Resolved, That the Committee take evidence on the COVID-19 outbreak, subject to the Chair’s discussions with the Government Chief Scientific Adviser. [Adjourned till Tuesday 10 March at 9.00 am Science and Technology Committee: Formal Minutes 2019–21 3 Tuesday 10 March 2020 Members present: Greg Clark, in the Chair Aaron Bell Mark Logan Chris Clarkson Carol Monaghan Katherine Fletcher Graham Stringer Andrew Griffith Zarah Sultana Darren Jones Dr Luke Evans and James Murray also attended under the provisions of paragraph (1)(e) of Standing Order No 137A (Select committees: power to work with other committees). 1. Health and Social Care Committee Resolved, That members of the Health and Social Care Committee be invited to attend the meeting today relating to the COVID-19 outbreak, pursuant to Standing Order No 137A(1)(e). 2. COVID-19 outbreak The Committee considered this matter. [Adjourned till Thursday 12 March at 9.00 am Thursday 12 March 2020 Members present: Greg Clark, in the Chair Aaron Bell Graham Stringer Mark Logan 1. Commercial Genomics The Committee considered this matter. 2. Evidence reported for publication Ordered, That the following written evidence be reported to the House for publication: Commercial genomics Correspondence from 23andMe (dated 14 January) 4 Science and Technology: Formal Minutes 2019–21 Correspondence from DNAfit (dated 21 November 2019) Correspondence from Ancestry (dated 12 December 2019) Correspondence from Baroness Blackwood, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Innovation (Lords) (dated 28 January) Clinical trials transparency Correspondence from Dr Till Bruckner (dated 30 January) Correspondence from Whittington Health NHS Trust Correspondence from University of Exeter and the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (dated November 2019) Correspondence from Baroness Blackwood, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Innovation (dated 22 January) Correspondence from the European Medicines Agency (dated 21 January) Correspondence from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (dated 20 January) Correspondence from the Health Research Authority (dated 4 March) Japanese Knotweed Correspondence from The Law Society (dated December 2019) Correspondence from Network Rail (dated 26 February) Correspondence from Advanced Invasives (dated 20 February) Commercial and recreational drone use in the UK Correspondence from Rt Hon Theresa Villiers MP, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (dated 10 February) Work of the Science Minister Correspondence from Rt Hon Chris Skidmore MP, Minister of State for Universities, Science, Research and Innovation, to the Committee (dated 10 February) Research Integrity Committee Correspondence from Sir Mark Walport, Chief Executive, UK Research and Innovation (dated 11 February) Innovate UK assessors Correspondence from Louisa Simons, Chief Operating Office Innovate UK (dated 14 January) [Adjourned till Wednesday 18 March at 9.00 am. Science and Technology Committee: Formal Minutes 2019–21 5 Wednesday 18 March 2020 Members present: Greg Clark, in the Chair Aaron Bell Graham Stringer Mark Logan Zarah Sultana 1. Declarations of interest Graham Stringer amended his declaration of interest of 4 March 2019 (For details, see appendix.) 2. Budget 2020: Research and Innovation spending Harriet Wallace, Director, International Research and Innovation, and Alexandra Jones, Director of Science Research and Innovation, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, Professor Sir Mark Walport, Chief Executive, and Sir John Kingman, Chair, UK Research and Innovation, gave oral evidence. Dr Rupert Lewis, Chief Science Policy Officer, The Royal Society, and Tim Figures, Director, Technology, Sustainability and Innovation, Make UK, gave oral evidence. 3. Commercial Genomics Resolved, That the Committee inquire into Commercial Genomics Ordered, That Professor Frances Flinter be appointed Specialist Adviser to assist the Committee in matters related to Commercial genomics. (For details of declarations of interests, see Appendix). 4. UK science, research and technology capability and influence in global disease outbreaks Resolved, That the Committee inquire into UK science, research and technology capability and influence in global disease outbreaks. [Adjourned till Wednesday 25 March at 10.15 am. Wednesday 25 March 2020 Members present: Greg Clark, in the Chair Aaron Bell Mark Logan Chris Clarkson Zarah Sultana Katherine Fletcher 1. New research funding agency Resolved, that the Committee inquire into the New research funding agency. 6 Science and Technology: Formal Minutes 2019–21 2. UK telecommunications infrastructure and the UK’s domestic capability Resolved, that the Committee inquire into UK telecommunications infrastructure and the UK’s domestic capability. 3. UK science, research and technology capability and influence in global disease outbreaks Professor Neil Ferguson, Director, Medical Research Council Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, gave oral evidence. Dr Richard Horton, Editor-in-Chief, The Lancet, gave oral evidence. Professor Andrew Pollard, Professor of Paediatric Infection and Immunity at the University of Oxford, and Dr Melanie Saville, Director, Vaccine Research and Development, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, gave oral evidence. Sir Patrick Vallance, Government Chief Scientific Adviser, gave oral evidence. Professor Sharon Peacock, Director, National Infection Service, Public Health England, gave oral evidence. [Adjourned till Wednesday 22 April at 9.00am. 2 April 2020 Evidence reported to the House for publication on 2 April 2020 (Order of the Committee, 4 March 2020): UK science, research and technology capability and influence in global disease outbreaks: - Correspondence with Sir Patrick Vallance, Government Chief Scientific Adviser, and Professor Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer, relating to the composition of SAGE and sub-groups informing the Government response to COVID-19, dated 30 March 2020. - Correspondence with Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP, relating to COVID-19 vaccinations, dated 30 March 2020 - Correspondence with Professor Sharon Peacock, Public Health England, relating to evidence behind COVID-19 testing strategy. Science and Technology Committee: Formal Minutes 2019–21 7 Wednesday 8 April 2020 Virtual meeting Members present: Greg Clark, in the Chair Aaron Bell Mark Logan Chris Clarkson Carol Monaghan Katherine Fletcher Graham Stringer Andrew Griffith Zarah Sultana Darren Jones Jeremy Hunt also attended under the provisions of paragraph (1)(e) of Standing Order No 137A (Select committees: power to work with other committees). 1. UK science, research and technology capability and influence in global disease outbreaks Resolved, That Jeremy Hunt of the Health and Social Care Committee be invited to attend the meeting today relating to UK science, research and technology capability and influence in global disease outbreaks, pursuant to Standing Order No 137A(1)(e) (Select
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA
    The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP 30 January 2020 Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA Dear Prime Minister, We are writing to you as a group of cross-party parliamentarians to express our grave concern over the contents of US President Donald Trump’s so-called ‘peace plan’ for Israel and the Palestinians. The plan presented on 28 January shows contempt for the rights of the Palestinian people and international law, and provides no realistic basis for a return to negotiations. Instead, it makes peace less likely, and threatens to undermine a fundamental principle of the post-WWII international legal order: the prohibition of annexation and territorial conquest. The long-standing position of the UK is that a negotiated peace settlement must be agreed to achieve a two-state solution based on the 1967 borders, leading to a safe and secure Israel living alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state that has secure and recognised borders, and with Jerusalem as a shared capital of both states. The vision presented by the US administration is one where Palestinians would have none of these: no true shared capital in Jerusalem, no sovereign control of its borders or security, and with Israeli control far beyond the Green Line. As a group of 16 UK charities warned this week: “if implemented [the plan] will lead to the formal annexation of Palestinian land, perpetual Israeli occupation, and the negation of Palestinians’ collective right to self-determination.” It is a plan that the Palestinians have no choice but to reject if they wish to maintain their fundamental rights, but that they will be punished for not accepting.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday 20 April 2021 COMMITTEE of the WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS
    1 SUPPLEMENT TO THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS Tuesday 20 April 2021 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE PROCEEDINGS FINANCE (No. 2) BILL (Clauses 1 to 5; Clauses 6 to 14 and Schedule 1; Clauses 24 to 26; Clause 28; Clause 30 and Schedule 6; Clauses 31 to 33; Clause 36 and Schedule 7; Clause 40; Clause 41; Clause 86; Clauses 87 to 89 and Schedules 16 and 17; Clauses 90 and 91; Clauses 92 to 96 and Schedule 18; Clause 97 and Schedule 19; Clauses 109 to 111 and Schedules 21 and 22; Clause 115 and Schedule 27; Clauses 117 to 121 and Schedules 29 to 32; Clauses 128 to 130; any new Clauses or new Schedules relating to: the impact of any provision on the financial resources of families or to the subject matter of Clauses 1 to 5, 24 to 26, 28, 31 to 33, 40 and 86; the subject matter of Clauses 6 to 14 and Schedule 1; the impact of any provision on regional economic development; tax avoidance or evasion; the subject matter of Clauses 87 to 89 and Schedules 16 and 17 and Clauses 90 and 91; the subject matter of Clauses 92 to 96 and Schedule 18, Clause 97 and Schedule 19 and Clauses 128 to 130) [FIRST AND SECOND DAY] GLOSSARY This document shows the fate of each clause, schedule, amendment and new clause. The following terms are used: Added: New Clause agreed without a vote and added to the Bill. Agreed to: agreed without a vote. Agreed to on division: agreed following a vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Report Monday, 9 November 2020 CONTENTS
    Daily Report Monday, 9 November 2020 This report shows written answers and statements provided on 9 November 2020 and the information is correct at the time of publication (07:12 P.M., 09 November 2020). For the latest information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements, please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/ CONTENTS ANSWERS 8 Licensed Premises: BUSINESS, ENERGY AND Coronavirus 20 INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 8 Life Sciences 20 Beer: Small Businesses 8 Low Pay: Coronavirus 21 Bounce Back Loan Scheme: Nuclear Power 22 Sussex 8 Nuclear Power Stations: Business: Coronavirus 9 Finance 22 Carbon Emissions 11 Nuclear Reactors 22 Consumer Goods: Safety 11 Overseas Students: EU Coronavirus: Disease Control 12 Nationals 23 Coronavirus: Remote Working 12 Personal Care Services: Coronavirus 23 Coronavirus: Social Distancing 13 Political Parties: Coronavirus 24 Debenhams: Coronavirus 13 Post Office: Legal Costs 24 Economic Situation: Coronavirus 14 Post Offices: ICT 25 Electronic Commerce: Renewable Energy 25 Regulation 14 Research: Public Consultation 27 Energy Supply 15 Research: Publishing 27 Energy: Meters 15 Retail Trade: Coventry 28 Erasmus+ Programme and Shipping: Tees Valley 28 Horizon Europe 16 Solar power: Faversham 29 Fireworks: Safety 16 Unemployment: Coronavirus 29 Green Homes Grant Scheme 17 Weddings: Coronavirus 30 Horizon Europe 18 Wind Power 31 Housing: Energy 19 Hydrogen 20 CABINET OFFICE 31 Musicians: Coronavirus 44 Ballot Papers: Visual Skateboarding: Coronavirus 44 Impairment 31
    [Show full text]
  • Vindication, Virtue, and Vitriol
    Journal of Computational Social Science https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00090-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Vindication, virtue, and vitriol A study of online engagement and abuse toward British MPs during the COVID-19 pandemic Tracie Farrell1 · Genevieve Gorrell1 · Kalina Bontcheva1 Received: 21 July 2020 / Accepted: 11 October 2020 © The Author(s) 2020 Abstract COVID-19 has given rise to a lot of malicious content online, including hate speech, online abuse, and misinformation. British MPs have also received abuse and hate on social media during this time. To understand and contextualise the level of abuse MPs receive, we consider how ministers use social media to communicate about the pandemic, and the citizen engagement that this generates. The focus of the paper is on a large-scale, mixed-methods study of abusive and antagonistic responses to UK politicians on Twitter, during the pandemic from early February to late May 2020. We fnd that pressing subjects such as fnancial concerns attract high levels of engagement, but not necessarily abusive dialogue. Rather, criticising authorities appears to attract higher levels of abuse during this period of the pandemic. In addi- tion, communicating about subjects like racism and inequality may result in accusa- tions of virtue signalling or pandering by some users. This work contributes to the wider understanding of abusive language online, in particular that which is directed at public ofcials. Keywords Online hate · Abusive speech · Natural language processing · Politics · COVID-19 · Twitter * Tracie Farrell [email protected] Genevieve Gorrell [email protected] Kalina Bontcheva [email protected] 1 University of Shefeld, Shefeld, UK Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 Journal of Computational Social Science Introduction Social media can ofer a “temperature check” on which topics and issues are trend- ing for certain cross-sections of the public, and how they feel about them [21].
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Staff Register
    REGISTER OF INTERESTS OF MEMBERS’ SECRETARIES AND RESEARCH ASSISTANTS (As at 15 October 2020) INTRODUCTION Purpose and Form of the Register In accordance with Resolutions made by the House of Commons on 17 December 1985 and 28 June 1993, holders of photo-identity passes as Members’ secretaries or research assistants are in essence required to register: ‘Any occupation or employment for which you receive over £410 from the same source in the course of a calendar year, if that occupation or employment is in any way advantaged by the privileged access to Parliament afforded by your pass. Any gift (eg jewellery) or benefit (eg hospitality, services) that you receive, if the gift or benefit in any way relates to or arises from your work in Parliament and its value exceeds £410 in the course of a calendar year.’ In Section 1 of the Register entries are listed alphabetically according to the staff member’s surname. Section 2 contains exactly the same information but entries are instead listed according to the sponsoring Member’s name. Administration and Inspection of the Register The Register is compiled and maintained by the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Anyone whose details are entered on the Register is required to notify that office of any change in their registrable interests within 28 days of such a change arising. An updated edition of the Register is published approximately every 6 weeks when the House is sitting. Changes to the rules governing the Register are determined by the Committee on Standards in the House of Commons, although where such changes are substantial they are put by the Committee to the House for approval before being implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • ICCAN Board Meeting April 2020 Quarterly Communications And
    Quarterly Communications & Engagement Report January – March 2020 This report represents a snapshot of ICCAN’s communication and Social media statistics engagement activity undertaken between January – March 2020. 861 57 posts 355 followers Twitter engagements Stakeholder engagement +86 147 57 posts 87 followers LinkedIn engagements +24 8 11 12 3 4 4 5 3 96 1 1 57 posts 29 followers 2 4 Facebook engagements 1 1 +9 Communications & Engagement project work Consultation workshop Community survey results Engagement undertaken Hosted in Birmingham 10 March, Ran for 17 days, received: with 60 stakeholders featured: • 137 responses • 19 attendees, including 11 airport • 96 from individuals representatives • 41 from representative groups • Industry view from ACOG / CAA • 17 different airports • Facilitated by The Consultation • Most comments about Heathrow / Institute Gatwick / Leeds Bradford 1 Independent Commission on Civil Aviation Noise | Presentation title 1 Quarterly Communications & Engagement Report October – March 2020 ICCAN Website Overview: Users: 2,372 | Pageviews: 11,833 | Average session duration: 2:33 Launched SoNA report Gatwick Area Times article and editorial on CPRE Conservation Airlines 2050 AOA Annual report mentioning Committee ICCAN Conference Conference Top 5 pages Top 5 pages Quarterly Communications & Engagement Report October – March 2020 ICCAN Website Overview Top document downloads: 1. Survey of Noise Attitudes Review 4. Engagements List 2. ICCAN Corporate Strategy 5. Response to 3. Board meeting minutes Heathrow
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Commons December 2019 Diane ABBOTT MP
    Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Labour Conservative Diane ABBOTT MP Adam AFRIYIE MP Hackney North and Stoke Windsor Newington Labour Conservative Debbie ABRAHAMS MP Imran AHMAD-KHAN Oldham East and MP Saddleworth Wakefield Conservative Conservative Nigel ADAMS MP Nickie AIKEN MP Selby and Ainsty Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Conservative Bim AFOLAMI MP Peter ALDOUS MP Hitchin and Harpenden Waveney A Labour Labour Rushanara ALI MP Mike AMESBURY MP Bethnal Green and Bow Weaver Vale Labour Conservative Tahir ALI MP Sir David AMESS MP Birmingham, Hall Green Southend West Conservative Labour Lucy ALLAN MP Fleur ANDERSON MP Telford Putney Labour Conservative Dr Rosena ALLIN-KHAN Lee ANDERSON MP MP Ashfield Tooting Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Conservative Conservative Stuart ANDERSON MP Edward ARGAR MP Wolverhampton South Charnwood West Conservative Labour Stuart ANDREW MP Jonathan ASHWORTH Pudsey MP Leicester South Conservative Conservative Caroline ANSELL MP Sarah ATHERTON MP Eastbourne Wrexham Labour Conservative Tonia ANTONIAZZI MP Victoria ATKINS MP Gower Louth and Horncastle B Conservative Conservative Gareth BACON MP Siobhan BAILLIE MP Orpington Stroud Conservative Conservative Richard BACON MP Duncan BAKER MP South Norfolk North Norfolk Conservative Conservative Kemi BADENOCH MP Steve BAKER MP Saffron Walden Wycombe Conservative Conservative Shaun BAILEY MP Harriett BALDWIN MP West Bromwich West West Worcestershire Members of the House of Commons December 2019 B Conservative Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • The Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP Secretary of State for Health And
    The Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Department of Health and Social Care Ministerial Correspondence and Public Enquiries Unit 39 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU 13 March 2020 Dear Secretary of State, Coronavirus and the social care workforce We are writing as cross-party Parliamentarians concerned about the urgent need to provide support to the social care sector in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. The social care sector plays a crucial role in supporting hundreds of thousands of vulnerable people in high-risk groups for Covid-19. There is a need to ensure both that there are strong protocols in place to keep vulnerable residents safe, and also to ensure continuity of care in the event that a significant proportion of the social care workforce has to take time off during the pandemic. We welcome the Chancellor’s commitment to provide local government with immediate financial support to protect adult social care services dealing with Covid-19 outbreaks, and the commitment that workers who self-isolate will be eligible for statutory sick pay from day one. We also welcome the guidance from NHS England advising NHS Trusts to: ‘Ensure that any member of staff, including bank staff and sub-contractors, who has to be physically present at an NHS facility to carry out their duties, receives full pay for any period in which they are required to self- isolate as a result of public health advice’. However, we are concerned that these actions will not protect the quarter of the social care workforce who are currently employed on zero-hours contracts, and that the drop in income which will result from receiving SSP may act as a disincentive to some social care workers to self- isolate, putting vulnerable people at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Together Submission Labour Party Community Organising Unit
    Labour Together Submission Labour Party Community Organising Unit Topline Since January 2019, the Community Organising Unit has: 1. Trained ​11,500​ activists, members and non members in leadership and community organising before the election. Helping identify and develop leaders to build Labour power in communities. 2. 17,500 people engaged in ‘round table’ ​listening campaigns with communities leading to social justice campaigns including: taking on bad landlords, to reclaiming community centres, to keeping open NHS surgeries to saving recycling centres. 3. During the General Election we trained over ​7500​ party members and supporters in persuasive canvassing providing members with the confidence and skills to listen and talk to the electorate. The Community Organising Unit launched in June 2018 with an first cohort of 6 community organisers. This grew to 20, with 9 digital community organisers in place by 2019 - taking the team to 29 in total. During the general election, 17 community organisers and 4 digital community organisers worked across the UK (with 5 members of staff seconded to the Member Mobilisation team). Over 100 CLPs have had training to some level in community organising or persuasive canvassing since the unit was set up. Background For the Labour Party to win the next election and beyond, it has to rebuild in its heartlands: win back Scotland, swing coastal towns and hold firm in the cities - building an alliance from London to Leigh and Lanarkshre. This presents a big challenge - to achieve it community organising must be at the centre of Labour’s rebuilding strategy. The phenomenal growth in Labour party membership was recognised to be disproportionately city based and simply mobilising members was not a solution, or even an option in areas where membership and vote share had been hemorrhaging for decades, particularly across the Midlands, the North and Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Today's Paper
    PAGE 3 NEWS: CORBYN TO HOST REFUGEES’ FIGHTBACK EVENT FOR MIGRANT RIGHTS for Peace and Socialism £1.50 Saturday/Sunday May 22-23 2021 Proudly owned by our readers | Incorporating the Daily Worker | Est 1930 | morningstaronline.co.uk IDF ATTACKS AL-AQSA AS PALESTINE CEASEFIRE BEGINS London and the world march in solidarity by Bethany Rielly exile are denied the right to return deaths of 12 Israelis by Hamas home, PSC said. rockets, must mark a turning point. “Israel’s system of apartheid and “There is no military solution to CAMPAIGNERS have vowed to con- ethnic cleansing cannot continue,” this conflict,” she said. “We must tinue fighting for freedom, justice the statement said. “We can’t stop establish a meaningful peace and equality for Palestinians with just because Israel has temporarily process that ensures a sovereign large crowds set to protest this stopped bombing Gaza. Palestinian state alongside a safe, weekend regardless of the latest “We must campaign and protest secure Israel becomes an achiev- ceasefire. until the Palestinian people enjoy able prospect.” Organisers are expecting at least what is their birth right; freedom, Other politicians also welcomed 150,000 people to join a mass rally justice and equality in their his- the ceasefire but said more action in London today to demand an end toric homeland.” was needed to achieve justice for to Israel’s brutal occupation and Saturday’s demonstration will Palestinians. siege of the Gaza strip. see protesters gather at Embank- Labour MP Zarah Sultana said It comes a day after Hamas and ment at 1pm before marching to on social media that “true peace Israel agreed to a ceasefire in the Hyde Park.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Strategic Aviation Special Interest
    Strategic Aviation Special Interest Group Wednesday 26 February 2020 11.00 am Westminster Room Local Government Association 18 Smith Square Westminster London SW1P 3HZ Guidance notes for members and visitors 18 Smith Square, London SW1P 3HZ Please read these notes for your own safety and that of all visitors, staff and tenants. Welcome! 18 Smith Square is located in the heart of Westminster, and is nearest to the Westminster, Pimlico, Vauxhall and St James’s Park Underground stations, and also Victoria, Vauxhall and Charing Cross railway stations. A map is available on the back page of this agenda. Security All visitors (who do not have an LGA ID badge), are requested to report to the Reception desk where they will be asked to sign in and will be given a visitor’s badge to be worn at all times whilst in the building. 18 Smith Square has a swipe card access system meaning that security passes will be required to access all floors. Most LGA governance structure meetings will take place on the ground floor, 7th floor and 8th floor of 18 Smith Square. Please don’t forget to sign out at reception and return your security pass when you depart. Fire instructions In the event of the fire alarm sounding, vacate the building immediately following the green Fire Exit signs. Go straight to the assembly point in Tufton Street via Dean Trench Street (off Smith Square). DO NOT USE THE LIFTS. DO NOT STOP TO COLLECT PERSONAL BELONGINGS. DO NOT RE-ENTER BUILDING UNTIL AUTHORISED TO DO SO. Open Council Open Council, on the 7th floor of 18 Smith Square, provides informal meeting space and refreshments for local authority members and officers who are in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Easter Beer Festival
    F R E E Vol 35 Feb/Mar No 1 2013 CAMRA members from branches in Greater London pose before setting off to see their MPs Editorial Leeds North West and chair of the All London Drinker is published PartY ParliamentarY SaVe the Pub group on behalf of the said, “TodaY has been incrediblY poW - London Branches of CAMRA, the Campaign for Real Ale Limited, erful but please carrY on What You’re and edited jointly by doing locallY… get more people behind Tony Hedger and Mark Davies. this. You are campaigning not onlY for Tel: 07790 750024. the great British pub, You are campaign - Material for publication should preferably be ing for the nation.” AndreW Griffith, sent by e-mail to [email protected]. the MP for Burton on Trent and chair - Correspondents unable to send letters to the edi - man of the All PartY ParliamentarY Beer tors electronically may post them to n the parliamentarY debate on the Brian Sheridan at 4, Arundel House, Heathfield Ibeer dutY escalator, Charlotte Leslie, Group said, “TodaY We haVe sent a Road, Croydon CR0 1EZ. the MP for Bristol North West, said that strong message… We loVe our beer, We Press releases should be sent by email to pubs Were a ‘real World’ Version of the loVe our pubs and We’re going to fight [email protected] House of Commons, Where people de - to defend them. You can all be VerY Changes to pubs or beers should be reported to proud that todaY We haVe all plaYed our Capital Pubcheck, bate about real things.
    [Show full text]