Developing a Conceptual Scientific Framework for Conservation in the Arid West

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Developing a Conceptual Scientific Framework for Conservation in the Arid West DEVELOPING A CONCEPTUAL SCIENTIFIC FRAMEWORK FOR CONSERVATION IN THE ARID WEST Aridlands Grazing Network, Workshop 1 Medano-Zapata Ranch, Colorado April 11–13, 2001 TNC’s Mission Statement The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to survive. Conservation Vision The Nature Conservancy’s vision is to conserve portfolios of functional conservation areas within and across ecoregions. Through this portfolio approach, we will work with partners to conserve a full array of ecological systems and viable native species. Conservation Goal for 2010 By 2010, The Nature Conservancy and its partners will take direct action to conserve 600 functional landscape--500 in the United States and 100 in 35 countries abroad. The Conservancy also will deploy high-leverage strategies to ensure the conservation of at least 2,500 other functional conservation areas--2,000 in the United States and 500 in other countries. Copies of this summary are available on the Landscape Conservation Network Web Site: www.tnc-ecomanagement.org Or contact: Bob Unnasch Monitoring and Adaptive Management Program 1109 Main Street, #333 Boise, ID 83702 208-343-8826; [email protected] Important concepts were outlined in three EXECUTIVE guest presentations: SUMMARY · Bruce Runnels, Vice President of TNC’s Rocky Mountain Division, provided an andscape Conservation Networks overview of grazing within the Conser- (LCNs) are a promising new vehicle vancy and touched on some of the Lfor catalyzing the development and biodiversity challenges unique to the implementation of innovative, landscape- American West. Bruce also introduced scale ecological management and restoration the Rocky Mountain Division’s Range- strategies at hundreds of TNC’s conserva- land Conservation Initiative. tion areas. The networks bring together Conservancy field staff, partners, and ex- · Charles Curtin, Director of the Arid perts in a progressive series of facilitated Lands Project, gave an overview of the workshops focused on key threats and scientific literature on the impacts of strategies. grazing. Charles noted that the impacts of grazing are confounded, and often In the five-state region known as the Rocky overshadowed, by factors such as cli- Mountain Division, TNC has identified 60 mate (especially rainfall) and fire. R e- landscape-scale areas where it intends to moving cattle from a particular work with partners to conserve biodiversity. degraded area will not necessarily lead Because more than 75% of these 60 areas to recovery. Rather, evidence suggests occur in ranching landscapes, the Conser- that conservation practitioners need to vancy has begun to develop strategies that focus their efforts on restoring and sus- are inclusive of livestock production; this taining natural processes. work also extends beyond the states that comprise TNC’s Rocky Mountain Division. · Richard Knight of Colorado State Uni- The Conservancy is now involved with versity talked about socio-economic is- grazing as a conservation tool at more than sues in today’s American West, and 25 sites in the American West. how they relate to conservation of ranchlands. There has been much dis- The issue of “conservation ranching” is both cussion about the relative impacts of complex, requiring integration of a number residential development versus ranch- of disciplines, and controversial. Recogniz- ing in the West (the “ranches vs. ing the need to imbue “conservation ranch- ranchettes” debate). Citing both his own ing” with sound science, and develop research and studies conducted by oth- practical, appropriately scaled solutions, ers, Richard explained why he believes TNC created the Aridlands Grazing Net- the conservation community needs to work. seek common ground with today’s ranchers to preserve both biodiversity The network held its first workshop at the and the ranching way of life. Medano-Zapata Ranch in Colorado, April 11–13, 2001. The meeting focused on re- Over the course of the three-day meeting, viewing the conceptual scientific frame- six key lessons and ideas emerged. Four of works of four “focal landscapes.” These the lessons relate to the idea that models four focal landscapes are the Zumwalt Prai- form the foundation for adaptive manage- rie in Oregon, the Owyhee Canyonlands in ment and effective conservation: southwest Idaho, the Great Sand Dunes portion of the Closed Basin in Colorado, and Clearly document conceptual model as- the Headwaters Ranch area in New Mexico. sumptions and where model components are based on expert opinion versus data. By documenting our degree of certainty in ES-1 model structure, we can identify areas similar sites where they will foster achieve- needing further study, and where adjust- ment of conservation goals. ments may be necessary based on improved knowledge. Identify shared goals as a means to reduce barriers to action. When working with Maintain consistency between viability partners, be open to compromise but be analyses and model structure. Models need aware of the consequences for conservation to include those key ecosystem structures, goals. Document why decisions are made functions, and dynamics that maintain or and scientifically assess the impacts of ac- degrade conservation target viability. tions taken. Long-term success depends on maintaining a realistic approach to land- Short-term climatic variation can be over- scape planning. whelmingly important to aridland systems. Physical drivers (e.g., geologic sub- strate, climate, soils) can often be more important than anthropogenic agents of change or biological fac- tors to system structure and func- tion. In the Arid West, systems are often sensitive to climatic variation (especially rainfall) and long-term climate change, and these relation- ships are integral to a thorough un- derstanding of the conservation needs of targets. Physical template and ecology first, economics second. It is critical to understand the physical template of a system and how physical fac- tors constrain ecosystem dynamics. Although economic and social com- ponents must eventually find their place within our hypotheses about ecosystem structure and dynamics, site practitioners must gain a thor- ough understanding of the ecology of a system before incorporating economic and social analyses. The other two lessons are about adaptive management and engag- ing our partners in the ranching community: Use compatible grazing practices as a multi-site or ecoregional-scale strategy. Successful grazing prac- tices on Conservancy-owned or The Nature Conservancy is using cattle grazing as a strat- other properties should be ex- egy to help protect two rivers and their associated conser- ported to adjacent or regionally vation targets at the Headwaters Ranch in New Mexico. ES-2 · Communicating standardized methods FOREWORD and concepts (e.g., the 5-S framework). ritical threats to biodiversity, in- Each network consists of 15 to 35 landscape- cluding fire suppression and danger- scale sites, and is structured around a series Cous fuel loads, invasive species, and of workshops held over a period of two to incompatible forestry and grazing practices, three years. Each workshop lasts approxi- imperil thousands of species and hundreds mately three days and consists of presenta- of conservation areas across millions of tions by Conservancy and external scientific acres. If The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is experts, work group sessions, and intensive to achieve its mission of preserving the di- peer review of products created by the focal versity of life on earth, these threats must be and participating landscapes (e.g., concep- addressed at the scale of entire landscapes. tual ecological models or monitoring plans). Accordingly, the Conservancy recently set the ambitious goal of taking direct action to The Aridlands Grazing Network, launched conserve 600 functional landscapes—500 in in April 2001, provides a forum and ongoing the United States and 100 in 35 countries support for the development and imple- abroad—by 2010. mentation of conservation strategies in the context of aridland ranching. There are cur- Achieving this goal will require TNC to de- rently four other Landscape Conservation velop ecological management strategies that Networks addressing wetland management, are effective at large spatial scales, and to restoration of fire-adapted ecosystems, inva- implement these strategies across portfolios sive species, and compatible forest man- of conservation areas quickly and efficiently. agement. To address these challenges, the Ecological Management and Restoration Program For more information on the Aridlands launched a series of Landscape Conserva- Grazing Network, contact Bob Unnasch tion Networks (LCNs) in late 2000. ([email protected]). For more information about the LCNs, contact Jeff Hardesty The goal of the Landscape Conservation ([email protected]) or Wendy Fulks Networks is to foster cross-site learning ([email protected]). while significantly advancing ecological management practices at TNC’s priority landscapes. The networks bring together site-based practitioners, partners, and scien- tific experts who deal with similar land- scape-scale ecological threats such as fire suppression, invasive species, or incompati- ble forestry practices. They provide a highly effective forum for: · Fostering cross-site learning; · Identifying and communicating best practices and lessons learned;
Recommended publications
  • Tourism in Wallowa County and the Zumwalt Prairie: In-Person Survey Results Summer 2012
    Copyright: Rick McEwen Tourism in Wallowa County and the Zumwalt Prairie: In-Person Survey Results Summer 2012 November 2013 Brittany Heller Intern Environmental Sciences Oregon State University Bruce Sorte Extension Economist Department of Applied Economics Oregon State University John Williams County Leader Agricultural and Natural Resources Wallowa County Extension Oregon State University Kasey Erm Intern Applied Economics Oregon State University Acknowledgments The authors appreciate the Wallowa County visitors and residents who graciously responded to the survey and welcomed us to their Maxville Heritage Gathering, Chief Joseph Days and Hells Canyon Mule Days. Funding for this study was provided by the Nature Conservancy/Wallowa Resources and the OSU Extension Service. 1 Introduction Wallowa County, Oregon, located in Northeast Oregon, is known for its natural amenities and, as the USDA Economic Research Service describes it, “landscape and climate have shaped the geography of rural growth and decline over the past 40 years. The rural outdoors has become a major asset for rural communities.”1 One of the notable natural amenities in the County is the Zumwalt Prairie (Prairie). “Its rolling hills run from bright green in the spring and early summer to shades of yellow and brown as the season progresses. With little sign of human habitation other than a few cattle ranches and plenty of abandoned farmsteads, the place is alive with wildlife including 3,000 elk, black bears, wolves, cougars, bighorn sheep and over 48 varieties of butterflies. The prairie is home to one of North America’s highest concentrations of breeding raptors (golden eagles, prairie falcons, northern harriers, kestrels and numerous varieties of hawks) as well as grassland songbirds.”2 Question The County has long been a tourist destination.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife-Habitat Relationships of the Grande Ronde River
    Wildlife-Habitat Relationships of the Grande Ronde River by Aryn E. Hayden ABSTRACT In selecting habitat animal species require food, water and adequate cover. When these criteria are taken into account it appears that habitats utilized by terrestrial wildlife along the Grande Ronde River change longitudinally from mixed conifer forests to ponderosa pine forests in the headwaters and middle reaches to grassland and shrub-steppe in the lower reaches. Species diversity of mammals, birds and reptiles within these habitats will also decrease towards the lower reaches to some degree as habitat changes along the Grande Ronde River. A potential decrease in species diversity as habitat changes may indicate that habitat specialist species are more likely to be found in the headwaters of and middle reaches while habitat generalists are likely to be found in the middle and lower reaches of the Grande Ronde River. This concept of decreasing species diversity in a downstream gradient indicates that the River Continuum Concept, traditionally an aquatic hypothesis, may have some applicability to distributions of terrestrial wildlife in the context of riverine ecosystems. Species diversity of terrestrial wildlife is also heavily influenced by the presence of riparian vegetation along the river. Riparian vegetation is likely to be found within the headwaters and middle reaches of the Grande Ronde River and in patches pertaining to locations of physical complexity along the river such as confluences with tributaries. Riparian vegetation provides complex habitat for mammals and birds that live along the river and those that utilize riparian habitat for foraging, water requirements, migration or other activities necessary for survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallowa Co. Campgrounds Tent/ Tent Elevation to DO Campground Trailer Only (Feet Above Sea Level) Toilet Water Fee 1
    THINGS Wallowa Co. campgrounds Tent/ Tent Elevation TO DO Campground trailer only (Feet above sea level) Toilet Water Fee 1. Umatilla Forks 6 6 2,800 X X $10 2. Target Meadow 16 2 4,800 X X $12 Continued from page 21 3. Woodland Park 6 5,120 X $8 21. Watch the Fourth of July fireworks 4. Jubilee Lake 48 5 4,820 X X $17 show at the lake. 5. Mottet 5 1 5,125 X X $8 A spectacular setting for a professional 6. Coyote Spring 8 21 5,050 X — pyrotechnics show. Water reflects the colors, and the blasts echo off the surrounding 7. Dougherty Spring 8 5,125 X — mountains. 8. Vigne 6 3,760 X X $6 22. Visit the grave of Old Chief Joseph. 9. Buckhorn 5 5,260 X — Stop and pay your respects to this legendary, peaceful icon. The sacred burial ground is 10. Saddle Creek 7 6,610 X — located near the foot of Wallowa Lake. 11. Blackhorse 16 4,000 X $8 23. Sign up kids to be in Chief Joseph 12. Ollokot 12 4,000 X $6 Days Kiddie Parade. 13. Lick Creek 5 7 5,440 X $6 Dress your kids up as Old West or other pioneering folk and compete for prizes. 14. Twin Lakes 8 6,480 X — 24. Go shopping in Joseph. 15. Hidden 3 10 4,450 X $6 Shop for locally crafted items and artwork. 16. Coverdale 2 9 4,250 X $6 Souvenir shops and outdoor dining add to 17.
    [Show full text]
  • May-June 2021
    $3.95 May- June OREGON 2021 NEW TRAIL CAM PHOTO HUNTER CONTEST! Bear photo Essay: Let ‘er Buck! Facts State capitol: Why later is greater for Gun control, spring hunts Coyote contest Ban bills on turkey fast track well you’re invited done to oha banquets aim for a higher & convention level of hunt 21-Gun salute! win 1 of these Oregon Afield: great guns! • turkey • Badger tree-stand tips Get 6 issues a year of Oregon Hunter delivered blackpowder blacktails to you when you join OHA! CELEBRATING TEN YEARS Under the leadership of our founder Jason Hairston, KUIU launched a new line of Ultralight Performance Hunting gear that changed the direction of the hunting industry forever. The vision to push the boundaries of what’s possible in engineering the world’s most innovative hunting gear lives on everyday as uncompromising hunters around the world trust KUIU to perform in the toughest conditions. GUIDE JACKET ATTACK PANT CHUGACH RAIN GEAR ULTRA MERINO PELOTON INNOVATION NEVER RESTS — SETTING THE STANDARD FOR ULTRALIGHT HUNTING GEAR PRO PACKS SUPER DOWN PRO KENAI ULTRA KUTANA AXIS A DECADE OF BEST SELLERS GUIDE JACKET ATTACK PANT CHUGACH RAIN GEAR ULTRA MERINO BASE LAYERS PELOTON BASE LAYERS PRO PACKS SUPER DOWN PRO KENAI ULTRA KUTANA PANT AXIS JACKET Only at KUIU.COM LIFETIME WARRANTY ON ALL OUR GEAR BASE LAYERS | INSULATION | OUTERWEAR | PACKS | SLEEP SYSTEMS | BOOTS | ACCESSORIES KUIU_2pg_Ad_KUIU Ten_Year_OregonHunter_May_June_21.indd 1 3/18/21 8:23 AM CELEBRATING TEN YEARS Under the leadership of our founder Jason Hairston, KUIU launched a new line of Ultralight Performance Hunting gear that changed the direction of the hunting industry forever.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recovery Plan for Silene Spaldingii (Spalding’S Catchfly)
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Recovery Plan for Silene spaldingii (Spalding’s Catchfly) Silene spaldingii/Edna Rey-Vizgirdas; Inset/Gina Glenne Draft Recovery Plan for Silene spaldingii (Spalding’s Catchfly) Region 1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Approved: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Draft Recovery Plan for Silene spaldingii ! October 2005 DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and protect listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, publish recovery plans, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, Tribal agencies, and other affected and interested parties. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific actions and may not represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in recovery plan formulation, other than our own. They represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Recovery plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to peer review before we adopt them as approved final documents. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. Please check for updates or revisions at the website below before using. Notice regarding use of proprietary data: All plant locations given are approximate. Exact plant locations are proprietary data of the NatureServe/Heritage programs of Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia, and cannot be redistributed by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bpa Working Draft - 06/21/2010 Habitat Lands Secured with Bpa Anadromous Fish Funds
    BPA WORKING DRAFT - 06/21/2010 HABITAT LANDS SECURED WITH BPA ANADROMOUS FISH FUNDS ABCDEFGHIJKLM 1 PROJECT NAME PROJECT NO. SPONSOR STATE PROJ. SUBBASIN ACREAGE HUs PERMANANCE SPECIES MGMT PLAN O&M MITIGATED DAM LEDGER 3 CATEGORY A--FISH HABITAT PROJECTS WITH WILDLIFE PROJECT ASSOCIATIONS 4 YAKAMA NATION RIPARIAN/WETLANDS RESTORATION 1992-062-00 YAKAMA NATION WA YAKIMA 5,000 Note 1 YES Waterfowl, eagle, raptor YES BPA Lower 4 C&I 5 PINE CREEK (WAGNER CONSERVATION AREA) 1998-022-00 CTWSRO OR JOHN DAY 9,000 Note 1 YES Bighorn Sheep YES BPA Lower 4 C&I 6 RAINWATER WILDLIFE AREA (Part II) 2000-026-00 CTUIR WA WALLA WALLA 2,340 Note 1 YES Elk, cougar, hawk, eagle YES BPA Lower 4 C&I 7 FORREST CONSERVATION AREA 2001-041-01 CTWSRO OR JOHN DAY 4,232 Note 1 YES Yellow warbler, mule deer, e YES BPA Lower 4 C&I 8 OXBOW CONSERVATION AREA 2000-015-00 CTWSRO OR JOHN DAY 1,022 Note 1 YES Columbia spotted frog, white YES BPA Lower 4 C&I 9 SUB-TOTAL 21,594 10 11 CATEGORY B--FISH PROJECTS WITH WILDLIFE VALUE 12 BUSTERBACK RANCH/ALTURAS LAKE CREEK (F&W) Acq'd 4/1/1992 USDA FOREST SERVICE ID SALMON 2,201 YES Mountain goat, northern flyin Forest Plan USDAFS Note 2 Negotiable 13 ELK CREEK CATTLE & HORSE ALLOTMENT 20032 SBT & IDFG (USDA FOREST SERVICE) ID SALMON 121,000 YES Lynx Forest Plan USDAFS Negotiable Negotiable 14 JOHNSON CREEK PROJECT USDA FOREST SERVICE ID 15 BURGDORF MEADOWS 1998-023-00 IDFG & NEZ PERCE TRIBE ID SALMON 94 YES Moose CE No (CE) Negotiable Negotiable 16 ZUMWALT PRAIRIE PRESERVE (CAMP CREEK RANCH) 2001-043-00 NATURE CONSERVANCY OR IMNAHA 27,000 YES Hawks Plan & CE TNC Snake/negotiable Negotiable 17 YAKIMA SIDE CHANNELS (UPPER YAKIMA) 1995-051-00 YAKAMA NATION WA YAKIMA 544 YES Mallard, yellow warbler Yes BPA Lower 4 C&I 18 YAKIMA SIDE CHANNELS (LOWER NACHES) 1995-051-00 YAKAMA NATION WA YAKIMA 376 YES Mallard, yellow warbler Yes BPA Lower 4 C&I 19 UPPER YAKIMA (CLE ELUM) HATCHERY 1988-115-00 YAKAMA NATION WA YAKIMA 353 YES Mallard, yellow warbler In Devel.
    [Show full text]
  • Raptor Research Foundationand Hawk Migration Association of North America
    PROGRAM and ABSTRACTS Raptor Research Foundation and Hawk Migration Association of North America JOINT CONFERENCE 12-16 September 2007 Holiday Inn Conference Center, Lehigh Valley Fogelsville, Pennsylvania HOSTED BY Hawk Mountain Sanctuary The Raptor Research Foundation and the Hawk Migration Association of North America express their sincere appreciation to its 2007 Kettling on the Kittatinny Conference Sponsors SPONSOR LEVEL PEREGRINE MERLIN BROADWING Lehigh Valley Audubon Society Northstar Science & Technology, LLC Birding Club of Delaware County Cornell University Press AMERICAN KESTREL NetShops Inc. Ontelaunee Energy Corporation Buteo Books Senate Engineering Company OTHER VENDORS & EXHIBITORS Ron Austing Photography Gey Band and Tag Company Paul Gritis Books Jim Lockyer - jl-studio Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Holiday Beach Raptor Observatory Association NonProfit VENDORS & Kittatinny Corridor Conservation EXHIBITORS Hawk Migration Association of Project North America Raptor Research Foundation Fred Gehlbach Wildlands Conservancy Pennsylvania Society for Ornithology Weyerbacher Brewing Company OTHER DONORS Audubon Pennsylvania and Silent Auction DONORS Mendocino Brewing Company Raptor Research Foundation and Hawk Migration Association of North America JOINT CONFERENCE 12-16 September 2007 HOSTED BY Hawk Mountain Sanctuary Conference Committee Laurie Goodrich, Local Committee Chair Holly Merker Dan Varland, RRF Chair Janet Modjeska Katie Andrews Jim Morris Dotty Brett Peter Saenger Fritz Brock Kim Van Fleet Janet Crawford Drew Weber Barb
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Occupancy by Breeding Hawks (Buteo Spp.) Over 25 Years on a Privately Managed Bunchgrass Prairie in Northeastern Oregon, USA
    Stable occupancy by breeding hawks (Buteo spp.) over 25 years on a privately managed bunchgrass prairie in northeastern Oregon, USA Kennedy, P. L., Bartuszevige, A. M., Houle, M., Humphrey, A. B., Dugger, K. M., & Williams, J. (2014). Stable occupancy by breeding hawks (Buteo spp.) over 25 years on a privately managed bunchgrass prairie in northeastern Oregon, USA. The Condor, 116(3), 435-445. doi:10.1650/CONDOR-12-174.1 10.1650/CONDOR-12-174.1 Cooper Ornithological Society Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Volume 116, 2014, pp. 435–445 DOI: 10.1650/CONDOR-12-174.1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Stable occupancy by breeding hawks (Buteo spp.) over 25 years on a privately managed bunchgrass prairie in northeastern Oregon, USA Patricia L. Kennedy,1* Anne M. Bartuszevige,2 Marcy Houle,3 Ann B. Humphrey,4 Katie M. Dugger,5 and John Williams6 1 Department of Fisheries and Wildlife and Eastern Oregon Agriculture and Natural Resource Program, Oregon State University, Union, Oregon, USA 2 Playa Lakes Joint Venture, Lafayette, Colorado, USA 3 Portland, Oregon, USA 4 Joseph, Oregon, USA 5 U.S. Geological Survey, Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA 6 Wallowa County Extension Office, Oregon State University, Enterprise, Oregon, USA * Corresponding author: [email protected] Submitted November 12, 2012; Accepted May 3, 2014; Published July 16, 2014 ABSTRACT Potential for large prairie remnants to provide habitat for grassland-obligate wildlife may be compromised by nonsustainable range-management practices. In 1979–1980, high nesting densities of 3 species of hawks in the genus Buteo—Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis), Red-tailed Hawk (B.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions-I
    Oregon Conservation Strategy 2016: Ecoregions-i Table of Contents – Chapter 3: Ecoregions ECOREGIONS ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 BLUE MOUNTAINS ................................................................................................................................................ 3 COAST RANGE ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 COLUMBIA PLATEAU .......................................................................................................................................... 21 EAST CASCADES .................................................................................................................................................. 27 KLAMATH MOUNTAINS ..................................................................................................................................... 36 NORTHERN BASIN AND RANGE ......................................................................................................................... 47 WEST CASCADES ................................................................................................................................................. 58 WILLAMETTE VALLEY ......................................................................................................................................... 67 NEARSHORE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail Progress Report Winter 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail Progress Report Winter 2018 Administrator’s Corner Greetings, The Nez Perce (Nee-Me-Poo) National Historic Trail (NPNHT) belongs to each of us. With use comes a responsibility to care for your Trail. How will you exercise that responsibility? As a Friend of the Trail, we’ll show you how. Become a Friend at www.fs.usda.gov/npnht. McFarland McFarland Join the many volunteers who play a part in helping to care for the - Trail…everyday, if you are one of those who love to hike, camp, ski, hunt, fish, or paddle, we invite you to stay informed and get involved. The experiences of the NPNHT and Auto Tour Route are not-to-be- missed. Cold weather and your favorite segment of the Trail and Auto Tour Broncheau of Sandra Courtesy Photo Route beckon on a winter day. Heed the call, yes, and go prepared Sandra Broncheau-McFarland on the left not only with the proper clothing and gear but also with the proper at the recent Renegades Celebration and knowledge. Remember, one needs at least as much fluid in winter as Pow Wow in Lapwai, ID. in summer. One should preferably drink water to stay hydrated and warm in the winter. During the past year, the programs, events, and trail work have enriched the lives of many school children and hundreds of community members, through meaningful and engaging exhibits, open houses, and youth programs. You can read more about these activates in this and past Progress Reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Zumwalt Prairie, Wallowa County, Oregon
    Evaluation of Zumwalt Prairie, Wallowa County, Oregon For its Merit in Meeting National Significance Criteria as a National Natural Landmark Representing Plateau Grasslands in the Columbia Plateau Biophysiographic Province Zumwalt Prairie photo © Rick McEwan, courtesy of The Nature Conservancy (TNC). by James S. Kagan June 2012 Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University PO Box 751, Mailstop: INR Portland, OR 97215 Contact Information: James S. Kagan, Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. Institute for Natural Resources – Portland, Portland State University. Mailstop: INR. P.O. Box 751, Portland, Oregon 97207. Citation: Kagan, J.S. 2012. Evaluation of Zumwalt Prairie, Wallowa County, Oregon for Merit in Meeting National Significance Criteria as a National Natural Landmark to Represent Plateau Grasslands in the Columbia Plateau Biophysiographic Province. National Park Service Technical Report, National Natural Landmarks Program, Fort Collins, CO. Table of Contents Table of Figures ....................................................................................................................................... iv Table of Tables ........................................................................................................................................ iv Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Partitioning and Reproductive Success of Three
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Marcy Jean Cottrell for the degree of Master of Science in Wildlife Science presented on October 2, 1981 Title: Resource Partitioning and Reproductive Success of Three Species of Hawks (Butp"p) in an-Oreqç,Prairie Signature redacted for privacy. Abstract approved_ Dr. Charles E. Warren 2) In a native prairie of Oregon (363 red-tailed (Buteo jamaicensis), ferruginous (Buteo regalis), and Swainson's hawks (Buteo swainsoni) coexist in one of the highest nesting Buteo densities in North 2merica. In 1979 and 1980, the distribution, density, and productivity of the three species was studied in re- lation to availability of food and nesting habitat. The degree of ecological segregation among the three species was also investigated. Red-tailed and ferruginous hawks showed considerable overlap in the timing of their nesting cycles; the Swainson's hawk nested about one month later in the spring. The major food item of all three species was the Belding ground squirrel (Spennophilus beld- ingi). The total dietary overlap among the three hawk species was high: in 1979 and 1980, red-tailed and ferruginous hawks overlapped 90 percent and 80 percent, red-tailed and Swainson's hawks 88 percent and 83 percent, and ferruginous and Swainson's hawks 83 percent and 95 percent. Although timing and use of food resources exhibited considerable overlap, habitat was partitioned. Nine major habitat types occur- red within the study area. Red-tailed hawks had almost exclusive use of pine groves and cultivated areas with cottonwood trees. Fer- ruginous hawks had almost exclusive use of south exposure sites where large rocky outcrops occurred.Use of other habitat types overlapped to some degree.
    [Show full text]