Agroforestry Systems Provide Firewood for Livelihood Improvement in Guatemala Nicole Sibelet, Karla E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agroforestry Systems Provide Firewood for Livelihood Improvement in Guatemala Nicole Sibelet, Karla E Agroforestry systems provide firewood for livelihood improvement in Guatemala Nicole Sibelet, Karla E. Posada, Isabel A. Gutiérrez-Montes To cite this version: Nicole Sibelet, Karla E. Posada, Isabel A. Gutiérrez-Montes. Agroforestry systems provide firewood for livelihood improvement in Guatemala. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, Montpellier : CIRAD, 2019, 340, pp.91-102. 10.19182/bft2019.340.a31692. hal-02619891 HAL Id: hal-02619891 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02619891 Submitted on 25 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Bois et Forêts des Tropiques – ISSN : L-0006-579X Volume 340 – 2e trimestre – Avril 2019 – p. 91-102 AGROFORESTERIE ET BOIS DE FEU AU GUATEMALA / LE POINT SUR... 91 Agroforestry systems provide firewood for livelihood improvement in Guatemala Nicole SIBELET1, 2, 3 Karla E. POSADA3 Isabel A. GUTIÉRREZ-MONTES3 1 CIRAD UMR INNOVATION 34398 Montpellier France 2 INNOVATION Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA Montpellier SupAgro Montpellier France 3 CATIE 7170 Turrialba 30501 Turrialba Costa Rica Auteur correspondant / Corresponding author: Nicole SIBELET – [email protected] Photo 1. Children from the village of Canapará Abajo in Jocotán, showing the trees in their corn crop. Photo K. Posada. Doi : 10.19182/bft2019.340.a31692 – Droit d’auteur © 2019, Bois et Forêts des Tropiques © Cirad – Date de soumission : 4 octobre 2018 ; date d’acceptation : 11 janvier 2019 ; date de publication : 1er avril 2019. Citer l’article / To cite the article Sibelet N., Posada K. E., Gutiérrez-Montes I. A., 2019. Agroforestry systems Licence Creative Commons : provide firewood for livelihood improvement in Guatemala. Bois et Forêts Attribution - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. des Tropiques, 340: 91-102. Doi : https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2019.340. Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) a31692 Bois et Forêts des Tropiques – ISSN: L-0006-579X Volume 340 – 2nd quarter - April 2019 - p. 91-102 92 FOCUS ON... / AGROFORESTRY AND FIREWOOD IN GUATEMALA N. Sibelet, K. E. Posada, I. A. Gutiérrez-Montes RÉSUMÉ ABSTRACT RESUMEN Les systèmes agroforestiers fournissent Agroforestry systems provide firewood Sistemas agroforestales proporcionan du bois-énergie qui améliore les moyens for livelihood improvement in Guatemala leña que mejora los medios de vida en d’existence au Guatemala Guatemala Dans le contexte du changement clima- Given the context of climate change and Ante el contexto de cambio climático y tique et de la pauvreté, les populations poverty, rural populations are increas- pobreza, las poblaciones rurales enfren- rurales sont de plus en plus confrontées ingly faced with the challenges of appro- tan crecientes retos para gestionar ade- aux défis de la gestion adéquate des res- priate resource management, adequate cuadamente los recursos, producir ali- sources, de la production alimentaire et food production and improving their mentos y tener mejor calidad de vida. de l’amélioration de la qualité de vie. Le quality of life. Guatemala has to cope Guatemala debe enfrentar el cambio cli- Guatemala doit faire face au changement with climate change and poverty while mático y la pobreza teniendo en cuenta climatique et à la pauvreté tout en tenant taking its agricultural production into su producción agrícola. En este sentido, compte de sa production agricole. À cet account. In this regard, agroforestry sys- los sistemas agroforestales se han pre- égard, les systèmes agroforestiers ont été tems have been proposed as an alter- sentado como un método alternativo de proposés comme méthode alternative de native method of sustainable produc- producción sostenible. Este artículo pre- production durable. Cet article présente tion. This article presents a comparison senta una comparación entre los sistemas une comparaison entre les systèmes agri- between conventional cropping systems agrícolas convencionales y los sistemas coles conventionnels et les systèmes agro- and enriched agroforestry systems in agroforestales enriquecidos en Camotán forestiers enrichis de Camotán et Jocotán. Camotán and Jocotán. The results show y Jocotán. Los resultados muestran que el Les résultats montrent que le système that the enriched agroforestry system sistema agroforestal enriquecido aporta el agroforestier enrichi contribue à 65 % du contributed to 65% of the firewood 65 % de la leña contra 7 % en el sistema bois-énergie contre 7 % pour le système compared to 7% from the conventional convencional. Las familias que utilizan el conventionnel. Les familles utilisant le cropping system. Families using the sistema agrícola convencional extraen el système agricole conventionnel ont extrait conventional cropping system extracted 81 % de su leña del bosque, mientras que 81 % de leur bois-énergie de la forêt, alors 81% of their firewood from the forest, las familias que utilizan el sistema agrofo- que les familles utilisant le système agro- while families using the enriched agro- restal enriquecido extraen sólo el 32 %. La forestier enrichi n’en ont extrait que 32 %. forestry system extracted only 32%. The leña producida por el sistema agroforestal Le bois-énergie produit par le système firewood produced by the enriched agro- enriquecido proporcionó un beneficio adi- agroforestier enrichi offre un avantage forestry system provided an additional cional a las mujeres, niños y jóvenes, que supplémentaire aux femmes, aux enfants benefit to women, children and young son los encargados de transportar los bul- et aux jeunes, qui sont chargés de trans- people tasked with carrying the bundles, tos, ya que no tuvieron que recorrer largas porter les fagots, car ils n’ont pas à par- in that they no longer needed to travel distancias para abastecer al hogar. Las courir de longues distances pour approvi- long distances to supply the household. familias construyeron y adaptaron conoci- sionner le foyer. Les familles ont construit Families constructed and adapted empir- mientos empíricos sobre el manejo de los et adapté des connaissances empiriques ical knowledge on tree management into árboles en sus cultivos. El sistema agrofo- sur la gestion des arbres dans leurs sys- their cropping systems. The enriched restal enriquecido se presenta entonces tèmes de culture. Le système agrofores- agroforestry system is thus presented como una solución potencial para satisfa- tier enrichi est donc présenté comme as a potential solution for meeting the cer la demanda anual de leña. La seguri- une solution potentielle pour répondre à annual demand for firewood. Land tenure dad de la tenencia de la tierra influye en la demande annuelle de bois-énergie. La security influences rural families’ deci- la decisión de las familias rurales de inver- sécurité foncière influence la décision des sion to invest or innovate. Agroforestry tir o innovar. Los sistemas agroforestales familles rurales d’investir ou d’innover. systems play a key role in augmenting desempeñan un papel clave en aumentar Les systèmes agroforestiers jouent un rôle resources and improving quality of life. los recursos y mejorar la calidad de vida. clef dans l’augmentation des ressources et l’amélioration de la qualité de vie. Keywords: agroforestry, fuelwood, forest, Palabras clave: agroforestería, leña, livelihood, Maya Ch’orti’, Guatemala. bosque, medios de vida, Maya Ch’orti’, Mots-clés : agroforesterie, bois-énergie, Guatemala. forêt, moyens d’existence, Maya Ch’orti’, Guatemala. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques – ISSN : L-0006-579X Volume 340 – 2e trimestre – avril 2019 – p. 91-102 AGROFORESTERIE ET BOIS DE FEU AU GUATEMALA / LE POINT SUR... 93 Introduction For decades, numerous conventions, protocols and agreements have been established on a global level in order to stop the degradation of forests and natural resources. Against a backdrop of increasing demand for natural resources, agroforestry has been presented as an alternative method of sustainable production (Nair, 1993; Beer et al., 2003). Agroforestry systems incorpo- rate an optimal management of resources such as soil, crops, trees and vegetation. They contribute to the pro- vision of ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation and soil improvement (Sileshi et al., 2007; FAO, 2014). In the context of climate change and persistent poverty, rural populations are constantly faced with the challenges of adequate resource management, food pro- duction and raising the quality of life. In tropical regions such as Central America, the majority of the population depends on agriculture for their livelihood and this puts pressure on natural resources, especially forests. Like any countries, Guatemala is a country that must cope with climate change and poverty by relying on agri- culture. Guatemala ranks number 9 on the Global Climate Risk Index, which means it is a country highly impacted by extreme weather events (Kreft et al., 2014) With a total population of 16,673,000 inhabitants, 59% of the population lives in poverty and 49% lives in rural areas (United Nations, 2017).
Recommended publications
  • ZAP GUATEMALA END of YEAR REPORT JANUARY 1, 2018 – DECEMBER 31, 2018 Recommended Citation: Zika AIRS Project (ZAP)
    The Zika AIRS (ZAP) Project Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS 2) Task Order Six ZAP GUATEMALA END OF YEAR REPORT JANUARY 1, 2018 – DECEMBER 31, 2018 Recommended Citation: Zika AIRS Project (ZAP). February 2019. ZAP Guatemala End of Year Report 2018. Rockville, MD. Abt Associates Inc. Contract No.: GHN-I-00-09-00013-00 Task Order: AID-OAA-TO-14-00035 Submitted to: United States Agency for International Development Submitted: February 14, 2019 Abt Associates Inc. 1 6130 Executive Boulevard 1 Rockville, Maryland 20852 1 T. 301.347.5000 1 F. 301.913.9061 1 www.abtassociates.com ZAP GUATEMALA END OF YEAR REPORT JANUARY 1, 2018 – DECEMBER 31, 2018 The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. 3 CONTENTS Contents Acronyms ii 1. Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................1 2. Progress and Outcomes.........................................................................................................2 2.1 Community Mobilization, Social and Behavior Change Communication .................. 2 2.2 Vector Control .............................................................................................................. 3 2.2.1 Larviciding and Source Reduction...................................................................................................3 2.2.2 IRS………… ......................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala: Zacapa
    BetterNDPBA solutions. Guatemala Final Report: Authors Fewer disasters. Safer world. Guatemala: Zacapa Image: Google 1 National Disaster Preparedness Baseline Assessment – Department Profile NDPBA Guatemala Report: Department Profile Department: Zacapa Department Capital: Zacapa Area: 2,691 km2 Zacapa is in eastern Guatemala and borders Honduras to the southeast. Excluding the highlands, the majority of the department’s climate is semi- arid, often going two months without rain. Crops include tomatoes, cantaloupe, tobacco, and sugar cane. 244,881 55.9% 2.8% 84.9% Population Population in Illiterate Adult Access to (2017) Poverty Population Improved Water Municipality Population Zacapa 77,092 Gualán 42,130 La Unión 34,345 Teculután 19,376 Rio Hondo 18,768 Estanzuela 12,444 Usumatlán 12,248 Cabañas 11,635 Huité 10,660 San Diego 6,183 Multi-Hazard Risk Rank: Very Low (22 of 22) Lack of Resilience Rank: Very Low (20 of 22) RVA Component Scores Table 1. Department scores and ranks (compared across departments) for each index Multi-Hazard Multi-Hazard Risk Lack of Resilience Vulnerability Coping Capacity Exposure Very Low Very Low Very Low Very Low Very High Score Rank (of 22) Score Rank (of 22) Score Rank (of 22) Score Rank (of 22) Score Rank (of 22) 0.293 22 0.395 20 0.089 21 0.396 20 0.607 3 2 NDPBA Guatemala Report: Department Profile Multi-Hazard Exposure (MHE) Multi-Hazard Exposure1 Rank: 21 of 22 Departments (Score: 0.089) Table 2. Estimated ambient population2 exposed to each hazard 0% 100% 0 People 259,306 People 0% 18% 0 People 46,040 People 1% 1,648 People MHE The Dry Corridor Located in Guatemala’s “Dry Corridor,” Raw MHE Zacapa department experiences extreme Relative MHE dry seasons, often going months without rain.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa • Afrique America • Amérique Asia «Asie Africa «Afrique
    WEEKLY EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RECORD, No. 7,1 4 FEBRUARY 1992 • RELEVE EPIDEMIOLOGIQUE HEBDOMADAIRE, N" 7 ,14 FEVRIER 1992 the west with 660 cases per 100 000 population in the week Hans l'ouest, avec 660 cas pour 100 000 habitants au cours de la ending 26 January has reported a decrease to 560 cases. All semaine qui s'est achevée le 26 janvier, a rapporté une diminution influenza viruses isolated this season have been influenza A à 560 cas. Tous les virus grippaux isolés cette saison ont été des and all those further studied have been identified as in­ virus A, et tous ceux qui ont été étudiés ultérieurement étaient des fluenza A(H3N2). Influenza B has been diagnosed by direct virus grippaux A(H3N2). La grippe B a été diagnostiquée par detection of the virus antigen in a few cases. détection directe de l'antigène du virus chez quelques cas. United Kingdom (7 February 1992).' Influenza activity Royaume-Uni (7 février 1992).1 L'activité grippale a continué à continued on a low level throughout January. However, out­ un bas niveau en janvier. Cependant, des flambées ont été rappor­ breaks were repotted among the elderly in residential tées Hans des résidences pour personnes âgées et dans plusieurs settings and in several schools during the second half of the écoles dînant la seconde quinzaine du mois. Les écoles fournissant month. Schools providing data an influenza reported an des données sur la grippe ont signalé un accroissement de 9,2 à 29,4 increase from 9.2 to 29.4 cases per 1000 children during cas pour 1 000 enfants en janvier — bien au-dessus du taux moyen January — well above the mean rate of 5.2 for the season de 5,2 cas observé au cours des saisons précédentes; Sur 267 isole­ in previous years.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricanes Eta and Iota on the Updated December 15Th, 2020 Segunda/Postrera Cropping Season in Central America
    SPECIALSPECIAL REPORT REPORT www.cropmonitor.orgwww.cropmonitor.org Impact of November Hurricanes Eta and Iota on the Updated December 15th, 2020 Segunda/Postrera Cropping Season in Central America Highlights • The start of the Segunda/Postrera agricultural season in Central America was generally favourable from August through October with above-average rainfall resulting in good crop development. • Crop conditions quickly deteriorated in November across parts of the region impacted by the passing of two Category 4 hurricanes, Hurricanes Eta and Iota. • The 2020 Atlantic hurricane season has been the most active ever recorded with 30 named storms, more than twice the long-term yearly average of 12, and the only season with two major hurricanes in November. This has resulted in one of the wettest October to November periods since 1981 across parts of Central America. • In early November, Hurricane Eta crossed Central America and affected an estimated 4 million people across the region as persistent rains and heavy winds resulted in flooding, landslides, and crop damage across Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, and Figure 1. Crop conditions over Central America and the Caribbean as of November 28th, 2020. Source: GEOGLAM Crop Monitor for Early Warning December Bulletin Guatemala. th • Two weeks later on November 17 , Hurricane Iota made landfall over northern Nicaragua as a Category 4 hurricane, the strongest Atlantic hurricane this year, and extended along virtually the same path as Hurricane Eta (Figure 2). While Iota quickly degraded to a tropical depression, persistent rains and high winds exacerbated previous damage from Eta across Nicaragua, Honduras, and Guatemala. • Excessive flooding and considerable damage to standing crops and agricultural infrastructure have significantly decreased yield prospects for the Segunda/Postrera season crops (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Territorial Groups in Central America
    The importance of territorial groups in Central America UNODC’s first global transnational organized crime threat These two types of groups are completely different in assessment (TOCTA) (The Globalization of Crime: A trans- character. Territorial groups are focused on controlling national organized crime threat assessment, published in territory and taxing activity within this domain. Trafficking 2010) spoke of two ways of looking at organized crime. The groups are hardly groups at all, but rather networks of first, and more common, is to focus on the groups involved. suppliers, transporters, and receivers, as would be encountered in any licit supply chain. In the region, they The global TOCTA found, however, that most transna- are often referred to as “transportistas”. Much of the violence tional organized crime is rather systemic, or market-based. in the region today is about the growing control of territorial As long as supply and demand exist, removing particular groups over transnational trafficking. This produces intermediaries is not sufficient to destroy the market. This conflicts between territorial groups and the transportistas, as is especially true in a globalized world. well as conflict between territorial groups. For example, hundreds of thousands of people are illegally smuggled into the United States each year, a flow far beyond Within these two broad headings, there are many distinct the capacity of any organized group to manage. Instead, variations. Some territorial groups focus almost exclusively thousands of smugglers ply the trade in an open market on preying on cocaine traffickers, and are known as with low barriers to entry. The same is true of the illegal tumbadores in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Solutions. Fewer Disasters. Safer World
    BetterNDPBA solutions. Guatemala Final Report: Authors Fewer disasters. Safer world. Guatemala 1 National Disaster Preparedness Baseline Assessment - Final Report 2 NDPBA Guatemala Final Report: Authors Authors Erin Hughey, PhD Scott Kuykendall, MS Director of Disaster Services Disaster Management Specialist Pacific Disaster Center Pacific Disaster Center [email protected] [email protected] Joseph Green, PhD Paulo Fernandes, Jr. Epidemiologist and Health Risk Disaster Services Analyst Specialist Pacific Disaster Center Pacific Disaster Center [email protected] [email protected] Dan Morath, MS, GISP Rachel Leuck, MS Senior Disaster Risk Analyst Disaster Services Analyst Pacific Disaster Center Pacific Disaster Center [email protected] [email protected] Doug Mayne, MaOL, CEM® Cassie Stelow, MS Disaster Management Advisor Senior Disaster Services Analyst Pacific Disaster Center Pacific Disaster Center [email protected] [email protected] © 2018 Pacific Disaster Center Table 1. Record of Changes Date Description Version 1/2/2018 Technical edit of NDBPA Guatemala report Mark Shwartz 2/6/2018 Final Review V9 3 4 NDPBA Guatemala Final Report: Acknowledgements Acknowledgements A special mahalo to Guatemala’s Coordinadora Nacional para la Reducción de Desastres (CONRED) for providing coordination and insight throughout the National Disaster Preparedness Baseline Assessment (NDPBA) project. Additional thanks to the Secretaría de Planificación y Programación (SEGEPLAN) for their support in project coordination and data gathering. CONRED and its partners have
    [Show full text]
  • The Bees of the Genus Centris Fabricius, 1804
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: European Journal of Taxonomy Jahr/Year: 2020 Band/Volume: 0618 Autor(en)/Author(s): Vivallo Felipe Artikel/Article: The bees of the genus Centris Fabricius, 1804 described by Theodore Dru Alison Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Apidae) 1-47 European Journal of Taxonomy 618: 1–47 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.618 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2020 · Vivallo F. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FB1B58E6-7E40-4C16-9DFF-2EA5D43BC0B3 The bees of the genus Centris Fabricius, 1804 described by Theodore Dru Alison Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Felipe VIVALLO HYMN Laboratório de Hymenoptera, Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão 20940‒040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:AC109712-1474-4B5D-897B-1EE51459E792 Abstract. In this paper the primary types of Centris bees described by the British entomologist Theodore Dru Alison Cockerell deposited in the Natural History Museum (London) and the Oxford University Museum of Natural History (Oxford) in the United Kingdom, as well as in the United States National Museum (Washington), American Museum of Natural History (New York), the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University (Philadelphia), and in the California Academy of Sciences (San Francisco) in the United States were studied. To stabilize the application of the name C. lepeletieri (= C. haemorrhoidalis (Fabricius)), a lectotype is designated. The study of the primary types allow proposing the revalidation of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala Annual Country Report 2020 Country Strategic Plan 2018 - 2020 Table of Contents
    SAVING LIVES CHANGING LIVES Guatemala Annual Country Report 2020 Country Strategic Plan 2018 - 2020 Table of contents 2020 Overview 3 Context and operations & COVID-19 response 6 Risk Management 8 Partnerships 9 CSP Financial Overview 10 Programme Performance 12 Strategic outcome 01 12 Strategic outcome 02 14 Strategic outcome 03 17 Strategic outcome 04 19 Strategic outcome 05 21 Strategic outcome 06 23 Cross-cutting Results 25 Progress towards gender equality 25 Protection and accountability to affected populations 26 Environment 27 Data Notes 27 Figures and Indicators 29 WFP contribution to SDGs 29 Beneficiaries by Sex and Age Group 29 Beneficiaries by Residence Status 30 Beneficiaries by Programme Area 30 Annual Food Transfer 30 Annual Cash Based Transfer and Commodity Voucher 31 Strategic Outcome and Output Results 32 Cross-cutting Indicators 38 Guatemala | Annual Country Report 2020 2 2020 Overview In 2020, WFP Guatemala contributed to addressing malnutrition and food insecurity deepened by the COVID-19. WFP’s Country Strategic Plan contributed to the priorities established by the Government of Guatemala and the United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) and to the COVID-19 National Response Plan. Activities focused on improved food security and enhanced nutrition for early childhood and school-aged children and on resilience building. These efforts ultimately contributed to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2 and 17, directly benefiting about 200,000 people in the country and an estimated 750,000 people indirectly through capacity strengthening support to national institutions. In line with the Government's efforts to curb the economic and social impacts of the COVID-19 on food security and nutrition, WFP scaled-up its emergency response operation and provided cash transfers to nearly 30,000 households, for a total of USD 3.4 million.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Ch'orti' in Chiquimula
    We were born here, We did not come here Aquí hemos nacido, no hemos venido Machiwar kayopá temeyum Iranon kuxpon tará Indigenous peoples’ rights and hydro-electric projects in Guatemala: The case of the Ch’orti’ in Chiquimula Independent Report prepared by Julian Burger, Monica Feria-Tinta and Claire McGregor June 2015 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 I BACKGROUND 5 A Purpose and scope of the mission 5 B Political context 6 C Economic context 7 D Indigenous peoples of Guatemala 8 II MAIN ACTORS IN THE CH’ORTI’ CONFLICT 11 E The community: the Ch’orti’ of Chiquimula 11 F Nuevo Día 13 G The company: Las 3 niñas 13 H Municipal and national authorities involved 14 III LEGAL FRAMEWORK 16 I The Guatemalan legal system 16 J Collective rights of indigenous peoples 17 K Rights to land, territory and resources 18 L Right to consultation 21 M Right to self-determination and right to development 24 N Obligations of the business sector on human rights 25 IV OBSERVATIONS 28 O Implementation of collective rights of indigenous peoples 28 P Implementation of right to land and territory 29 Q Implementation of right to consultation 32 R The business model 36 S Impacts of the project 36 T Two concepts of ‘development’ 39 U Response of local state actors to unrest: conflict and criminalization of the Ch’orti’ people 40 V Response of national state actors 44 V RECOMMENDATIONS 46 APPENDIX A – MAP OF CH’ORTI’COMMUNITIES 47 The case of the Ch’orti’ in Chiquimula 1 The expert delegation meeting with Ch’orti’ community members The fact-finding team acted pro bono and without remuneration.
    [Show full text]
  • Vitazyme on Cantaloupe
    Vital Earth Resources 706 East Broadway, Gladewater, Texas 75647 (903) 845-2163 FAX: (903) 845-2262 22001122 CCrroopp RReessuullttss VViittaazzyymmee oonn CCaannttaalloouuppee Researchers : Robert Garcia and Cristhian Mazariegos, Foragro Development, Guatemala City, Guatemala; Alex Diaz and William Sosa, Heads of Plant Protection, Proingasa Classic, Guatemala Company : Proingasa Classic Location : Site 21, Section 8, Valves 26 to 29, km 132, Senegal, Rio Hondo, Zacapa Department, Guatemala Variety : Honey Dew HQ252 Soil type : silty clay Climate : temperature, 27 to 38°C; relative humidity, 63% Altitude : 230 meters above sea level Planting date : October 22, 2011 Experimental design : A cantaloupe field was selected for a trial to determine the effectiveness of Vitazyme to enhance the yield and quality of the crop. A treated area of 2 manzanas (1.4 ha) was compared to an adja - cent untreated area using three Vitazyme applications. 1. Control 2. Vitazyme Fertilization : unknown Vitazyme applications : (1) Roots of the seedlings were dipped into a drum containing a 1% Vitazyme solu - tion (1 liter in 100 liters of water) for one manzana (0.7 ha), to give 1.4 liters/ha; (2) foliar and soil spray of 1.4 liters/ha at 23 days after planting; (3) foliar and soil spray of 1.4 liters/ha at 43 days after planting (sprayer had 1,100 liter capacity, with purple Albuz nozzles applying 0.49 liter/minute). Growth results : Vitazyme treatments gave a greater leaf area and root mass than the control plots. Yield and quality results : Harvesting was completed December 18, 2011. Melon Brix Treatment Brix Change %% Fruit brix, % Control 10.60 — Vitazyme 12.16 +1.56 (15%) Increase in fruit Brix with Vitazyme: 1.56 points The increase in fruit soluble solids with Vitazyme was most excellent, 1.56 points, which would be very noticeable to the person eating the melons.
    [Show full text]
  • Guatemala Page 1 of 14
    Guatemala Page 1 of 14 Facing the Threat Posed by Iranian Regime | Daily Press Briefing | Other News... Guatemala Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 8, 2006 Guatemala is a democratic republic with a population of approximately 12.7 million. In 2003 national elections, generally considered by international observers to be free and fair, Oscar Berger of the Grand National Alliance coalition (GANA) won a four-year term, which began in January 2004. While the civilian authorities generally maintained control of the security forces, there were some instances in which members of the police force acted independently. While the government generally respected the human rights of its citizens, serious problems remained. Corruption and substantial inadequacies in the police and judicial sectors, widespread societal violence, and impunity for criminal activity continued. The following human rights and societal problems were reported: unlawful killings committed by members of the security forces widespread societal violence, including numerous killings police involvement in kidnappings harsh and dangerous prison conditions arbitrary arrest and detention failure of the judicial system to ensure full and timely investigation, fair trials, or due process failure to protect judicial sector officials, witnesses, and civil society organizations from intimidation impunity discrimination and violence against women trafficking in persons, including commercial sexual exploitation of children ethnic discrimination, particularly against indigenous people ineffective enforcement of labor laws, including child labor provisions RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life Although the government and its agents did not commit any politically motivated killings, members of the police force committed a number of unlawful killings.
    [Show full text]
  • CSA Options Implemented and Evaluated Across the CCAFS Climate-Smart Villages AR4D Sites: 2019 Global Inventory
    CSA options Implemented and Evaluated across the CCAFS Climate-Smart Villages AR4D sites: 2019 Global Inventory Olopa Santa Rita Doyogena Guatemala Honduras Kaffrine Ethiopia Senegal Hoima Basona-Werana Cinzana Uganda Ethiopia Cauca Mali Guinayangan Colombia Lawra Jirapa Nyando Philippines Ghana Kenya Lushoto Tanzania Location of the Climate-Smart Villages AR4D sites across the five focal CCAFS regions Contacts Regional Program Leader for East Africa Regional Program Leader for Latin America Regional Program Leader for Southeast Asia Dawit Solomon Deissy Martinez Baron Pramod Aggarwal ([email protected]) ([email protected]) ([email protected]) Science Officer for East Africa Science Officer for Latin America Science Officer for Southeast Asia Maren Radeny Andrea Castellanos Sridhar Gummadi ([email protected]) ([email protected]) ([email protected]) Regional Program Leader for West Africa Regional CSV Coordinator for Latin America Robert Zougmoré Jose David Martinez (r.zougmoré@cigar.org) ([email protected]) Regional CSV Coordinator for West Africa Mathieu Ouedraogo ([email protected]) Citation Bonilla-Findji O, Martinez JD, Ortega LA, Paz L, Lopez C, Alvarez OS, Ouedraogo M, Recha J, Vidallo R. 2020. CSA options implemented and evaluated across the CCAFS Climate-Smart Villages AR4D sites: 2019 Global Inventory. Wageningen, The Netherlands: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). CCAFS Climate-Smart Villages AR4D sites location Latitude Longitude Region Country CSV sites (centroide) (centroide) Closer admin unit Doyogena 7.31 37.78 Doyogena district, Southern Highlands Ethiopia Basona-Werana 9.68 39.53 Basona-Werana district, Central Highlands Nyando, Kisumu and Kericho county, Western EA Kenya Nyando -0.27 35.07 Kenya Tanzania Lushoto -4.79 38.42 Lushoto district, Tanga Region Uganda Hoima 1.54 31.55 Hoima district, Western Region Ghana Lawra-Jirapa 10.74 -2.62 Lawra and Jirapa districts, Upper West region.
    [Show full text]