ASH with WESTMARSH PARISH MAGAZINE SEPTEMBER 2019 60P
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Letter C Introduction This Index Covers Volumes 110–112 and 114–120 Inclusive (1992–2000) of Archaeologia Cantiana, Volume 113 Being the Preceding General Index
Archaeologia Cantiana - On-line Index 2012 GENERAL INDEX TO VOLUMES CX 1992 ( 110 ) to CXX 2000 ( 120 ) Letter C Introduction This index covers volumes 110–112 and 114–120 inclusive (1992–2000) of Archaeologia Cantiana, volume 113 being the preceding General Index. It includes all significant persons, places and subjects with the exception of books reviewed. Volume numbers are shown in bold type and illustrations are denoted by page numbers in italic type or by (illus.) where figures occur throughout the text. The letter n after a page number indicates that the reference will be found in a footnote and pull-out pages are referred to as f – facing. Alphabetisation is word by word. Women are indexed by their maiden name, where known, with cross references from any married name(s). All places within historic Kent are included and are arranged by civil parish. Places that fall within Greater London are to be found listed under their London Borough. Places outside Kent that play a significant part in the text are followed by their post 1974 county. Place names with two elements (e.g. East Peckham, Upper Hardres) will be found indexed under their full place name. T. G. LAWSON, Honorary Editor Kent Archaeological Society, February 2012 Abbreviations m. married Ald. Alderman E. Sussex East Sussex M.P. Member of Parliament b. born ed./eds. editor/editors Notts. Nottinghamshire B. & N.E.S. Bath and North East f facing Oxon. Oxfordshire Somerset fl. floruit P.M. Prime Minister Berks. Berkshire G. London Greater London Pembs. Pembrokeshire Bt. Baronet Gen. General Revd Reverend Bucks. -
Ash Neighbourhood Planning Referendum – Information Statement
Ash Neighbourhood Planning Referendum – Information Statement A Referendum relating to the adoption of the Ash Neighbourhood Plan will be held on Thursday 22 July 2021. The question which will be asked in the Referendum is: ‘Do you want Dover District Council to use the Neighbourhood Plan for Ash to help it decide planning applications in the neighbourhood area?’ The Referendum area is identified on the map which is included with this information statement. The Referendum area is identical to the area which has been designated as the Ash Neighbourhood area. A person is entitled to vote in the Referendum if on Tuesday 6 July 2021: • They are entitled to vote in a local government election in the Referendum area; and • Their qualifying address for the election is in the Referendum area. A person’s qualifying address is, in relation to a person registered in the register of electors, the address in respect of which they are entitled to be registered. The Referendum expenses limit that will apply in relation to the Referendum is £2,362 + (£0.059 per elector) which is a limit of £2,516.40. The number of persons entitled to vote in the Referendum by reference to which that limit has been calculated is 2617. The Referendum will be conducted in accordance with procedures which are similar to those used at local government elections. A copy of the specified documents, that is those documents listed below, may be inspected at: • the Dover District Council Offices, Whitfield, Monday to Friday between the hours of 10am and 2pm by appointment only. -
Kent Archæological Society Library
http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society KENT ARCILEOLOGICAL SOCIETY LIBRARY SIXTH INSTALMENT HUSSEY MS. NOTES THE MS. notes made by Arthur Hussey were given to the Society after his death in 1941. An index exists in the library, almost certainly made by the late B. W. Swithinbank. This is printed as it stands. The number given is that of the bundle or box. D.B.K. F = Family. Acol, see Woodchurch-in-Thanet. Benenden, 12; see also Petham. Ady F, see Eddye. Bethersden, 2; see also Charing Deanery. Alcock F, 11. Betteshanger, 1; see also Kent: Non- Aldington near Lympne, 1. jurors. Aldington near Thurnham, 10. Biddend.en, 10; see also Charing Allcham, 1. Deanery. Appledore, 6; see also Kent: Hermitages. Bigge F, 17. Apulderfield in Cudham, 8. Bigod F, 11. Apulderfield F, 4; see also Whitfield and Bilsington, 7; see also Belgar. Cudham. Birchington, 7; see also Kent: Chantries Ash-next-Fawkham, see Kent: Holy and Woodchurch-in-Thanet. Wells. Bishopsbourne, 2. Ash-next-Sandwich, 7. Blackmanstone, 9. Ashford, 9. Bobbing, 11. at Lese F, 12. Bockingfold, see Brenchley. Aucher F, 4; see also Mottinden. Boleyn F, see Hever. Austen F (Austyn, Astyn), 13; see also Bonnington, 3; see also Goodneston- St. Peter's in Tha,net. next-Wingham and Kent: Chantries. Axon F, 13. Bonner F (Bonnar), 10. Aylesford, 11. Boorman F, 13. Borden, 11. BacIlesmere F, 7; see also Chartham. Boreman F, see Boorman. Baclmangore, see Apulderfield F. Boughton Aluph, see Soalcham. Ballard F, see Chartham. -
SWAT-132 DBA Hoaden Court Farm Dec
Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment in advance of the Proposed Development at the site of Hoaden Court Farm, Hoaden, Ash, CT3 2LG 8th December 2017 Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment in Advance of the proposed development at the site of Hoaden Court Farm, Hoaden, Ash CT3 2LG NGR: TR27059 60128 Date of Report: December 2017 SWAT Archaeology Swale & Thames Archaeological Survey Company School Farm Oast, Graveney Road Faversham, Kent ME13 8UP Tel: 01795 532548 or 07885 700112 www.SWATarchaeology.com Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment in Advance of the proposed development at the site of Hoaden Court Farm, Hoaden, Ash CT3 2LG Contents Appendix 1 Archaeological Sites……………………………………………………………………….………………..30 List of Plates……....................................................................................................................... 5 List of Figures........................................................................................................................... 5 1. SUMMARY............................................................................................................................ 6 2. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 7 3. GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY.............................................................................................. 8 3.1 Geology.……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 3.2 Topography…………………………………………………………………………………………………….………... 8 3.3 Historic hedgerows…………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 -
Crystal Reports Activex Designer
List of applications decided between 12/04/2021 and 19/04/2021 (Decision Date) REFERENCE ADDRESS PROPOSAL DECISION DATE DECISION CON/20/00244/I Hop Cottage 11 - Refuse storage 15-Apr-2021 COAPP Saddlers Hill Goodnestone Canterbury Kent CT3 1PF CON/20/00015/A Land Rear Of 3 - Materials 14-Apr-2021 COAPP Jasmine Cottage Saunders Lane Ash CT3 2BX CON/20/00244/E Hop Cottage 7 - Surface water 16-Apr-2021 COAPP Saddlers Hill Goodnestone Canterbury Kent CT3 1PF CON/20/00244/H Hop Cottage 12 - Bicycle storage 15-Apr-2021 COAPP Saddlers Hill Goodnestone Canterbury Kent CT3 1PF CON/20/00244/F Hop Cottage 8 - Foul sewage 15-Apr-2021 COAPP Saddlers Hill Goodnestone Canterbury Kent CT3 1PF REFERENCE ADDRESS PROPOSAL DECISION DATE DECISION CON/20/00244/B Hop Cottage 4 - External joinery 16-Apr-2021 COAPP Saddlers Hill Goodnestone Canterbury Kent CT3 1PF CON/19/01098/A Coldred Place 3 - Materials 13-Apr-2021 COPART Church Road Coldred Dover Kent CT15 5AQ CON/18/00643/D Land On The West 15 - Surface water drainage 13-Apr-2021 COAPP Side Of Moat Lane Ash Kent CON/18/00643/E Land On The West 16 - Arboricultural statement 13-Apr-2021 CONAP Side Of Moat Lane Ash Kent CON/20/00244/D Hop Cottage 6 - Public sewers 15-Apr-2021 COAPP Saddlers Hill Goodnestone Canterbury Kent CT3 1PF CON/17/00056/G Whitfield Urban 2 - Materials 16-Apr-2021 COAPP Extension Phase 1A Sandwich Road Whitfield Kent REFERENCE ADDRESS PROPOSAL DECISION DATE DECISION CON/19/00598/N Land West Of 23 - Delivery and servicing 15-Apr-2021 COAPP Montagu Road management plan (DSMP) Montagu Road Discovery Park Sandwich Kent 21/00247 30 Grange Road Erection of single storey side 16-Apr-2021 GTD Deal and rear extensions with 5no. -
A Guide to Parish Registers the Kent History and Library Centre
A Guide to Parish Registers The Kent History and Library Centre Introduction This handlist includes details of original parish registers, bishops' transcripts and transcripts held at the Kent History and Library Centre and Canterbury Cathedral Archives. There is also a guide to the location of the original registers held at Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre and four other repositories holding registers for parishes that were formerly in Kent. This Guide lists parish names in alphabetical order and indicates where parish registers, bishops' transcripts and transcripts are held. Parish Registers The guide gives details of the christening, marriage and burial registers received to date. Full details of the individual registers will be found in the parish catalogues in the search room and community history area. The majority of these registers are available to view on microfilm. Many of the parish registers for the Canterbury diocese are now available on www.findmypast.co.uk access to which is free in all Kent libraries. Bishops’ Transcripts This Guide gives details of the Bishops’ Transcripts received to date. Full details of the individual registers will be found in the parish handlist in the search room and Community History area. The Bishops Transcripts for both Rochester and Canterbury diocese are held at the Kent History and Library Centre. Transcripts There is a separate guide to the transcripts available at the Kent History and Library Centre. These are mainly modern copies of register entries that have been donated to the -
The Tevelein Tree
. The Tevelein Tree The Descendent Tree of Jean Thevelein 1 Jean TEVELEIN b: Abt. 1618 Pas-De-Calais, Guemps, France d: Abt. 1676 in Deduced from Jacob's and Isaac's marriage dates. ... +Marie BUNNE b: Abt. 1622 Pas-De-Calais, Guemps, France ....... 2 Pierre Le Roy TEVELEIN b: 1643 Guemps ............ +Marie RAIRE b: 1641 Guemps ....... 2 Marie TEVELEIN b: Abt. 1645 France ............ +Jean LE HOUCQ ................ 3 Abraham LE HOUCQ b: 11/07/1670 Guines, France ................ 3 Marie LE HOUCQ b: 02/06/1674 Guines, France ....... *2nd Husband of [1] Marie TEVELEIN: ............ +Abraham LE DOUX ....... 2 Jacob[1] TEVELEIN b: 1651 France; natif de Ofquerque et Guemp ............ +Anne CHEVALLIER b: 1653 natif de Marquize en Boulenois et y deff te ................ 3 Marie TEVELEIN b: 1675 Calais, France d: 29/04/1679 in Guines, France ................ 3 Jacob[2] TEVELEIN b: 28/10/1676 Calais, France ................ 3 Marie TEVELEIN b: 21/05/1680 Guines, France (Mary) ................ 3 Jacob[3] TEVELEIN b: 18/10/1682 Guines, France ................ 3 Anne TEVELEIN b: 10/06/1685 Guines, France ....... 2 Isaac[1] TEVELEIN b: 1654 Guines, France; natif de la paroise de Marcq ............ +Ester DU FOUR b: 1651 Guines, France; natif de la Commune de Guines ................ 3 Marie TEVELEIN b: 31/10/1677 Guines, France ....... *2nd Wife of [2] Isaac[1] TEVELEIN: ............ +Elizabeth DOSSELAR b: 1661 Guines, France ................ 3 Isaac[2] TEVELEIN b: 16/09/1683 Guines, France d: 17/01/1764 in London, England ..................... +Elizabeth OLIVE b: 22/03/1682 Guines, France ......................... 4 Isaac[3] TEVELEIN b: 19/03/1707 Canterbury, Kent, England d: 04/04/1779 in Canterbury, Kent, England ............................. -
Notes on Roman Roads in East Kent Margary
http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society NOTES ON ROMAN ROADS IN EAST KENT By IvAN D. MARGARY, F.S.A. THE Roman roads of East Kent are generally so obvious and well known that no further description of them seems necessary. There are, however, a few points at which the line is doubtful or where topographical problems admit of some discussion, and it is in considera- tion of these that the following notes are offered. They are based upon field observation made during a visit of some days to the district in June, 1947. STONE STREET—LYMPNE TO CANTERBURY The very striking directness of this road makes it clear that its purpose was to link Canterbury with the Roman port at Lympne. This was probably situated below the old cliffs, near the hamlet of West Hythe, to which access is given by a convenient combo in the cliffs at that point from Shipway Cross above. The Saxon Shore fort at Stutfall Castle was, of course, a late Roman construction, much later than Stone Street, and was probably connected to West Hythe by a spur road below the cliffs, for access to it from Lympne, directly above, would have been awkward. It is to Shipway Cross and the head of the combe that the main alignment of Stone Street is exactly directed. Although it has now disappeared between the Cross and New Inn Green, there are distinct traces of its scattered stone metalling in the field to the south of the Green, while portions of hedgerows and a footpath mark some parts of its course there. -
Draft Local Plan Proposed Site Allocations - Reasons for Site Selection
Topic Paper: Draft Local Plan Proposed Site Allocations - Reasons for Site Selection Dover District Local Plan Supporting document The Selection of Site Allocations for the Draft Local Plan This paper provides the background to the selection of the proposed housing, gypsy and traveller and employment site allocations for the Draft Local Plan, and sets out the reasoning behind the selection of specific site options within the District’s Regional, District, Rural Service, Local Centres, Villages and Hamlets. Overarching Growth Strategy As part of the preparation of the Local Plan the Council has identified and appraised a range of growth and spatial options through the Sustainability Appraisal (SA) process: • Growth options - range of potential scales of housing and economic growth that could be planned for; • Spatial options - range of potential locational distributions for the growth options. By appraising the reasonable alternative options the SA provides an assessment of how different options perform in environmental, social and economic terms, which helps inform which option should be taken forward. It should be noted, however, that the SA does not decide which spatial strategy should be adopted. Other factors, such as the views of stakeholders and the public, and other evidence base studies, also help to inform the decision. The SA identified and appraised five reasonable spatial options for growth (i.e. the pattern and extent of growth in different locations): • Spatial Option A: Distributing growth to the District’s suitable and potentially suitable housing and employment site options (informed by the HELAA and Economic Land Review). • Spatial Option B: Distributing growth proportionately amongst the District’s existing settlements based on their population. -
Flood Risk to Communities Dover
Kent County Council Flood Risk to Communities Dover June 2017 www.kent.gov.ukDRAFT In partnership with: Flood Risk to Communities - Dover This document has been prepared by Kent County Council, with the assistance of: • The Environment Agency • Dover District Council • The River Stour (Kent) Internal Drainage Board • Southern Water For further information or to provide comments, please contact us at [email protected] DRAFT Flood Risk to Communities - Dover INTRODUCTION TO FLOOD RISK TO COMMUNITIES 1 DOVER OVERVIEW 2 SOURCES OF FLOODING 5 ROLES AND FUNCTIONS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF FLOOD RISK 6 THE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 6 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL 7 DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL 9 THE RIVER STOUR (KENT) INTERNAL DRAINAGE BOARD 10 SOUTHERN WATER 10 PARISH COUNCILS 11 LAND OWNERS 11 FLOOD AND COASTAL RISK MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT 13 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PLANS AND STRATEGIES 14 NATIONAL FLOOD AND COASTAL EROSION RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 14 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PLANS 14 LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 15 CATCHMENT FLOOD MANAGEMENT PLANS 15 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PLANS 16 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS 16 STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT (SFRA) 17 RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 17 UNDERSTANDING FLOOD RISK 18 FLOOD RISK MAPPING 18 HOW FLOOD RISK IS EXPRESSED 18 FLOOD MAP FOR PLANNING 19 NATIONAL FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT 20 PROPERTIES AT RISK 21 SURFACE WATER MAPPING 22 PLANNING AND FLOOD RISK 23 PLANNING AND SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE (SUDS) 24 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL’S STATUTORY CONSULTEE ROLE 24 EMERGENCY PLANNING 26 PLANNING FOR AND MANAGING FLOODING EMERGENCIES 26 CATEGORY 1 RESPONDERS 26 CATEGORY 2 RESPONDERS 27 KENT RESILIENCE FORUM 28 SANDBAGS 29 PERSONAL FLOOD PLANNING AND ASSISTANCE 30 FLOOD ADVICE FOR BUSINESSES 30 FLOOD WARNINGS 30 KEY CONTACTS 32 SANDWICH 33 DOVER NORTH 35 DEAL DRAFT37 DOVER WEST 39 DOVER TOWN 41 APPENDICES 43 GLOSSARY i Flood Risk to Communities - Dover INTRODUCTION TO FLOOD RISK TO COMMUNITIES This document has been prepared for the residents and businesses of the Dover District Council area. -
Dover District Council Submission on Council Size
Dover District Council Submission on Council Size 8 December 2017 [This page has been intentionally left blank] Contents Section Page No. Foreword from the Chief Executive, Nadeem Aziz 3 Summary of Proposals 5 Part 1 - Introduction 6 Electoral Review 6 The Dover District 6 Shared Services 8 The Dover District Local Plan 9 Electoral Arrangements for the Dover District 9 Part 2 – Governance and Decision Making Arrangements 11 Current Governance Arrangements 11 The Executive 11 The Council 16 Other Bodies 16 Committee Arrangements 17 Delegated Decisions 18 Outside Body Appointments 19 Plans for Future Governance Arrangements 19 Committees 20 Proposed Council Size of 32 Councillors 27 Part 3 – Scrutiny Function 28 Current Arrangements 28 Future Scrutiny Arrangements 29 The Preferred Model 31 Part 4 – The Representational Role of Councillors in the Community 32 Part 5 – Comparison with Other Districts 34 Comparison with Canterbury and Shepway 35 Part 6 – Overall Conclusions on Council Size 37 Appendix 1 – Committee Functions 39 Appendix 2 – Outside Body Appointments 43 Appendix 3 – Ward Councillor Role 45 Appendix 4 – Proposed Future Governance Arrangements 47 1 | Page [This page has been intentionally left blank] 2 | Page Foreword Nadeem Aziz Chief Executive I am pleased to provide the Council’s submission on council size for consideration by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) as part of the preliminary stage of the Electoral Review process. You will recall that the Council had initially requested a review on council size for ‘around 35’ councillors at its meeting held on 17 May 2017. This initial position has been refined following an Extraordinary Council meeting held on 6 December 2017 and we are now asking that a council size of 32 Members be adopted. -
Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches.