DOCSLIB.ORG

1 50000000 Forest Service 2 01000000 Northern Region R1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: FS000 Lvl Org Code and Description 1 50000000 Forest Service 2 01000000 Northern Region R1 3 01000009 Fire, Aviation & Air 3 0100MTDC Missoula Tech and Development 3 01020000 Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest 4 01020001 Dillon Ranger District 4 01020002 Wise River Ranger District 4 01020003 Wisdom Ranger District 4 01020004 Butte Ranger District 4 01020006 Madison Ranger District 4 01020007 Jefferson Ranger District 4 01020008 Pintler Ranger District 3 01030000 Bitterroot National Forest 4 01030001 Stevensville Ranger District 4 01030002 Darby Ranger District 4 01030003 Sula Ranger District 4 01030004 West Fork Ranger District 4 010300AD Bitterroot NF ADs 4 0103HELI Bitterroot Helitack Crew 4 0103IHC2 Bitterroot IHC 3 01040000 Idaho Panhandle National Forests 4 01040001 Coeur d'Alene River Ranger District 5 0104IHC Idaho Panhandle IHC 4 01040004 St. Joe Ranger District 4 01040006 Sandpoint Ranger District 4 01040007 Bonners Ferry Ranger District 4 01040008 Priest Lake Ranger District 4 0104AD Idaho Panhandle AD Employee 4 0104HELI IPNF Helitack 3 01100000 Flathead National Forest 4 01100001 Swan Lake Ranger District 4 01100004 Spotted Bear Ranger District 4 01100006 Hungry Horse Ranger District 4 01100008 Tally Lake Ranger District 4 0110FIHC Flathead Hotshot Crew 4 0110GNC Great Northern T2 Crew 4 0110HELI Flathead NF Helitack 3 01110000 Custer Gallatin National Forest 4 01110003 Gardiner Ranger District 4 01110004 Yellowstone Ranger District 4 01110006 Bozeman Ranger District 4 01110007 Hebgen Lake Ranger District 4 01110080 Custer Gallatin National Forest - Billin 4 01110082 Beartooth Ranger District 4 01110083 Sioux Ranger District 4 01110084 Ashland Ranger District 4 011100AD Custer Gallatin AD Employees 4 0111HRAP Custer Gallatin NF Helicopter Rappellers 4 0111SMKJ West Yellowstone Interangency Fire Cente 3 01120000 Helena National Forest Page Nbr: 1 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 01/07/21 08:18 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: FS000 Lvl Org Code and Description 4 01120001 Townsend Ranger District 4 01120002 Helena Ranger District 4 01120004 Lincoln Ranger District 4 0112CMH Central MT Helitack 4 0112IHC Helena Hotshots 3 01140000 Kootenai National Forest 4 01140001 Rexford Ranger District 4 01140003 Fortine Ranger District 4 01140004 Three Rivers Ranger District 4 01140005 Libby Ranger District 4 01140007 Cabinet Ranger District 3 01150000 Helena - Lewis and Clark National Fores 4 01150001 Rocky Mountain Ranger District 4 01150003 Belt Creek Office 4 01150004 Judith Office 4 01150006 Judith - Musselshell Ranger District 4 01150007 Belt Creek - White Sulphur Springs Range 4 01150011 Townsend Ranger District 4 01150012 Helena Ranger District 4 01150014 Lincoln Ranger District 4 011500GF Helena - Lewis and Clark NF - Great Fall 4 0115CMH Central MT Helitack 4 0115GFAD Great Falls AD 4 0115HAD Helena AD 4 0115HIHC Helena Hotshots 4 0115LIHC Lewis and Clark Hotshots 3 01160000 Lolo National Forest 4 01160003 Missoula Ranger District 5 0116SHOT Lolo Hotshots 4 01160004 Ninemile Ranger District 4 01160005 Plains/Thompson Falls Ranger Districts 4 01160006 Seeley Lake Ranger District 4 01160007 Superior Ranger District 4 011600AD Lolo AD's 4 0116HELI National & Forest Helicopter 3 01170000 Nez Perce National Forest 4 01170001 Salmon River Ranger District 4 01170004 Clearwater Ranger District 4 01170005 Red River Ranger District 4 01170006 Moose Creek Ranger District 4 01170052 Palouse Ranger District 4 01170053 North Fork Ranger District 4 01170055 Lochsa Ranger District 4 01170056 Powell Ranger District 4 011700AD Nez Perce-Clearwater NF AD Emp 4 0117HELI Forest HELITACK Prgm 4 0117SMKJ GAC Smokejumpers 3 01180000 Dakota Prairie Grasslands 4 01180001 Sheyenne Ranger District 4 01180006 Grand River District Page Nbr: 2 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 01/07/21 08:18 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: FS000 Lvl Org Code and Description 4 01180007 Medora Ranger District 4 01180008 Mckenzie Ranger District 3 01510007 Aviation And Fire Management 2 02000000 Rocky Mountain Region R2 3 02000005 State And Private Forestry 3 02020000 Bighorn National Forest 4 02020001 Powder River Ranger District 4 02020004 Medicine Wheel Ranger District 4 02020006 Tongue Ranger District 3 02030000 Black Hills National Forest 4 02030001 Bearlodge Ranger District 4 02030003 Hell Canyon Ranger District 4 02030004 Elk Mountain Ranger District 4 02030006 Harney Ranger District 4 02030008 Nemo Ranger District 4 02030009 Pactola Ranger District 4 0203SHOT Black Hills NF Tatanka Hotshots 3 02040000 Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre And Gunnison Nat 4 02040002 Grand Valley Ranger District 4 02040005 Norwood Ranger District 4 02040006 Ouray Ranger District 4 02040007 Gunnison Ranger District 4 02040008 Paonia Ranger District 4 02040009 Taylor Ranger District 3 02060000 Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest 4 02060001 Yampa Ranger District 4 02060002 Brush Creek-Hayden Ranger District 4 02060003 Hahns Peak-Bears Ears Ranger District 4 02060004 Parks Ranger District 4 02060005 Laramie Ranger District 4 02060009 Douglas Ranger District 3 02070000 Nebraska National Forest 4 02070001 Bessey Ranger District 4 02070002 Pine Ridge Ranger District 4 02070005 Fall River Ranger District 4 02070006 Wall Ranger District 4 02070009 Fort Pierre National Grasslands 3 02090000 Rio Grande National Forest 4 02090001 Forest Supervisor 4 02090003 Conejos Peak Ranger District 4 02090004 Divide Ranger District 4 02090007 Saguache Ranger District 3 02100000 Arapaho And Roosevelt National Forests 4 02100001 Boulder Ranger District 4 02100005 Canyon Lakes Ranger District 4 02100006 Pawnee Ranger District # National Grassl 4 02100007 Clear Creek Ranger District 4 02100008 Sulphur Ranger District 3 02120000 Pike And San Isabel National Forests 4 02120001 Leadville Ranger District Page Nbr: 3 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 01/07/21 08:18 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: FS000 Lvl Org Code and Description 4 02120002 Salida Ranger District 4 02120003 San Carlos Ranger District 4 02120006 Comanche Ranger District (Comanche Natio 4 02120007 Cimarron Ranger District (Cimarron Natio 4 02120009 Pikes Peak Ranger District 4 02120010 South Park Ranger District 4 02120011 South Platte Ranger District 3 02130000 San Juan National Forest 4 02130005 Mancos/Dolores Ranger District 4 02130006 Pagosa Ranger District 4 02130008 Columbine Ranger District 4 0213HELI Durango Helitack 4 0213IHC San Juan Hotshots 3 02140000 Shoshone National Forest 4 02140001 Clarks Fork Ranger District 4 02140002 Greybull Ranger District 4 02140003 Washakie Ranger District 4 02140004 Wapiti Ranger District 4 02140005 Wind River Ranger District 3 02150000 White River National Forest 4 02150001 West Zone/Aspen Ranger District 4 02150002 West Zone/Blanco Ranger District 4 02150003 West Zone/Sopris Ranger District 4 02150004 Eagle Ranger District 4 02150007 East Zone/Holy Cross Ranger District 4 02150008 West Zone/Rifle Ranger District 4 02150010 East Zone/Dillon Ranger District 2 03000000 Southwestern Region R3 3 03010000 Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests Fores 4 03010001 Alpine Ranger District 4 03010002 Black Mesa Ranger District 4 03010003 Clifton Ranger District 4 03010006 Springerville Ranger District 4 03010007 Lakeside Ranger District 3 03020000 Carson National Forest 4 03020001 Canjilon Ranger District 4 03020002 El Rito Ranger District 5 0302RITO El Rito Southwest Firefighters Type 2 Cr 4 03020003 Jicarilla Ranger District 4 03020004 Camino Real Ranger District 5 0302PENA Penasco Southwest Firefighters Type 2 Cr 5 0302TAOS Taos Southwest Firefighters Type 2 Crew 4 03020006 Tres Piedras Ranger District 4 03020007 Questa Ranger District 5 0302QUES Questa Southwest Firefighters Type 2 Cre 4 0302IHC Carson Hotshots 3 03030000 Cibola National Forest 4 03030002 Mt. Taylor Ranger District 4 03030003 Magdalena Ranger District 4 03030004 Mountainair Ranger District Page Nbr: 4 Property of the US Government - Not for distribution outside IQCS Fire Support Activities Operator: wchristopher This document contains Sensitive but Unclassified information Dt/Time: 01/07/21 08:18 Properly destroy in accordance with the GRS/BLM Combined Records Scedule (MS-1220, Appendix 2) Incident Qualification and Certification System Agency Hierarchy Agency: FS000 Lvl Org Code and Description 4 03030005 Sandia Ranger District 4 03030006 Black Kettle National Grasslands 4 03030007 Kiowa/Rita Blanca National Grasslands 3 03040000 Coconino National Forest 4 03040006 Red Rock Ranger District 4 03040007 Mogollon Rim Ranger District 4 03040008 Flagstaff Ranger District 3 03050000 Coronado National Forest 4 03050001 Douglas Ranger District 4 03050002
Recommended publications
  • Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan

    Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan

    Comments on the DEIS for the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Plan Submitted September 15, 2014 via Electronic Mail and Certified Mail #7014-0150-0001-2587-0812 On Behalf of: Archaeology Southwest Center for Biological Diversity Sierra Club The Wilderness Society WildEarth Guardians Table of Contents II. Federal Regulation of Travel Management .................................................................................. 4 III. Impacts from Year Round Motorized Use Must be Analyzed .................................................. 5 IV. The Forest Service’s Preferred Alternative .............................................................................. 6 V. Desired Conditions for Travel Management ................................................................................. 6 VI. Purpose and Need Statements ................................................................................................... 7 VII. Baseline Determination .............................................................................................................. 8 A. The Forest Service cannot arbitrarily reclassify roads as “open to motor vehicle use” in the baseline. ............................................................................................................................................ 10 B. Classification of all closed or decommissioned routes as “open to motor vehicle use” leads to mischaracterization of the impacts of the considered alternatives. ...................................................... 11 C. Failure
  • Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804

    Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804

    Photo by Louis Kamler. www.nationalforests.org Building 27, Suite 3 Fort Missoula Road Missoula, MT 59804 Printed on recycled paper 2013 ANNUAL REPORT Island Lake, Eldorado National Forest Desolation Wilderness. Photo by Adam Braziel. 1 We are pleased to present the National Forest Foundation’s (NFF) Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2013. During this fourth year of the Treasured Landscapes campaign, we have reached $86 million in both public and private support towards our $100 million campaign goal. In this year’s report, you can read about the National Forests comprising the centerpieces of our work. While these landscapes merit special attention, they are really emblematic of the entire National Forest System consisting of 155 National Forests and 20 National Grasslands. he historical context for these diverse and beautiful Working to protect all of these treasured landscapes, landscapes is truly inspirational. The century-old to ensure that they are maintained to provide renewable vision to put forests in a public trust to secure their resources and high quality recreation experiences, is National Forest Foundation 2013 Annual Report values for the future was an effort so bold in the late at the core of the NFF’s mission. Adding value to the 1800’s and early 1900’s that today it seems almost mission of our principal partner, the Forest Service, is impossible to imagine. While vestiges of past resistance what motivates and challenges the NFF Board and staff. to the public lands concept live on in the present, Connecting people and places reflects our organizational the American public today overwhelmingly supports values and gives us a sense of pride in telling the NFF maintaining these lands and waters in public ownership story of success to those who generously support for the benefit of all.
  • Gila National Forest Fact Sheet

    Gila National Forest Fact Sheet

    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Because life is good. GILA NATIONAL FOREST The Gila National Forest occupies 3.3 million acres in southwestern New Mexico and is home to the Mexican spotted owl, Mexican gray wolf, Gila chub, southwestern willow flycatcher, loach minnow, and spikedace. The forest also encompasses the San Francisco, Gila, and Mimbres Rivers, and the scenic Burros Mountains. In the 1920s, conservation pioneer Aldo Leopold persuaded the Forest Service to set aside more than half a million acres of the Gila River’s headwaters as wilderness. This wild land became the nation’s first designated wilderness Photo © Robin Silver — the Gila Wilderness Area — in 1924. The Gila National Forest is home to threatened Mexican spotted owls and many other imperiled species. n establishing the Gila Wilderness Area, the Gila The Gila National Forest’s plan by the numbers: National Forest set a precedent for protection Iof our public lands. Sadly, it appears that • 114,000: number of acres of land open to safeguarding the Gila for the enjoyment of future continued destruction; generations is no longer management’s top priority. • 4,764: number of miles of proposed motorized On September 11, 2009, the Gila National Forest roads and trails in the Gila National Forest, equal to released its travel-management plan, one of the worst the distance from Hawaii to the North Pole; plans developed for southwestern forests. Pressure • $7 million: road maintenance backlog accumulated from vocal off-road vehicle users has overwhelmed the by the Gila National Forest; Forest Service, which has lost sight of its duty to protect • less than 3 percent: proportion of forest visitors this land for future generations.
  • IMBCR Report

    IMBCR Report

    Integrated Monitoring in Bird Conservation Regions (IMBCR): 2015 Field Season Report June 2016 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies 14500 Lark Bunting Lane Brighton, CO 80603 303-659-4348 www.birdconservancy.org Tech. Report # SC-IMBCR-06 Bird Conservancy of the Rockies Connecting people, birds and land Mission: Conserving birds and their habitats through science, education and land stewardship Vision: Native bird populations are sustained in healthy ecosystems Bird Conservancy of the Rockies conserves birds and their habitats through an integrated approach of science, education and land stewardship. Our work radiates from the Rockies to the Great Plains, Mexico and beyond. Our mission is advanced through sound science, achieved through empowering people, realized through stewardship and sustained through partnerships. Together, we are improving native bird populations, the land and the lives of people. Core Values: 1. Science provides the foundation for effective bird conservation. 2. Education is critical to the success of bird conservation. 3. Stewardship of birds and their habitats is a shared responsibility. Goals: 1. Guide conservation action where it is needed most by conducting scientifically rigorous monitoring and research on birds and their habitats within the context of their full annual cycle. 2. Inspire conservation action in people by developing relationships through community outreach and science-based, experiential education programs. 3. Contribute to bird population viability and help sustain working lands by partnering with landowners and managers to enhance wildlife habitat. 4. Promote conservation and inform land management decisions by disseminating scientific knowledge and developing tools and recommendations. Suggested Citation: White, C. M., M. F. McLaren, N. J.
  • LIGHTNING FIRES in SOUTHWESTERN FORESTS T

    LIGHTNING FIRES in SOUTHWESTERN FORESTS T

    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. LIGHTNING FIRES IN SOUTHWESTERN FORESTS t . I I LIGHT~ING FIRES IN SOUTHWESTERN FORESTS (l) by Jack S. Barrows Department of Forest and Wood Sciences College of Forestry and Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 (1) Research performed for Northern Forest Fire Laboratory, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station under cooperative agreement 16-568 CA with Rocky Mountain For­ est and Range Experiment Station. Final Report May 1978 n LIB RARY COPY. ROCKY MT. FO i-< t:S'f :.. R.l.N~ EX?f.lt!M SN T ST.A.1101'1 . - ... Acknowledgementd r This research of lightning fires in Sop thwestern forests has been ? erformed with the assistan~e and cooperation of many individuals and agencies. The idea for the research was suggested by Dr. Donald M. Fuquay and Robert G. Baughman of the Northern Forest Fire Laboratory. The Fire Management Staff of U. S. Forest Service Region Three provided fire data, maps, rep~rts and briefings on fire p~enomena. Special thanks are expressed to James F. Mann for his continuing assistance in these a ctivities. Several members of national forest staffs assisted in correcting fire report errors. At CSU Joel Hart was the principal graduate 'research assistant in organizing the data, writing computer programs and handling the extensive computer operations. The initial checking of fire data tapes and com­ puter programming was performed by research technician Russell Lewis. Graduate Research Assistant Rick Yancik and Research Associate Lee Bal- ::.
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication

    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication

    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2021 to 06/30/2021 Coronado National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Gypsy Moth Management in the - Vegetation management Completed Actual: 11/28/2012 01/2013 Susan Ellsworth United States: A Cooperative (other than forest products) 775-355-5313 Approach [email protected]. EIS us *UPDATED* Description: The USDA Forest Service and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service are analyzing a range of strategies for controlling gypsy moth damage to forests and trees in the United States. Web Link: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/wv/eis/ Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Nationwide. Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Sarah Shoemaker 228, subpart A. Orders NOI in Federal Register 907-586-7886 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] d.us *UPDATED* Est. DEIS NOA in Federal Register 03/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws.
  • Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators

    Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: a Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators

    USDA United States Department of Agriculture Research Natural Areas on Forest Service National Forest System Lands Rocky Mountain Research Station in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, General Technical Report RMRS-CTR-69 Utah, and Western Wyoming: February 2001 A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and E'ducators Angela G. Evenden Melinda Moeur J. Stephen Shelly Shannon F. Kimball Charles A. Wellner Abstract Evenden, Angela G.; Moeur, Melinda; Shelly, J. Stephen; Kimball, Shannon F.; Wellner, Charles A. 2001. Research Natural Areas on National Forest System Lands in Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Western Wyoming: A Guidebook for Scientists, Managers, and Educators. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-69. Ogden, UT: U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 84 p. This guidebook is intended to familiarize land resource managers, scientists, educators, and others with Research Natural Areas (RNAs) managed by the USDA Forest Service in the Northern Rocky Mountains and lntermountain West. This guidebook facilitates broader recognitionand use of these valuable natural areas by describing the RNA network, past and current research and monitoring, management, and how to use RNAs. About The Authors Angela G. Evenden is biological inventory and monitoring project leader with the National Park Service -NorthernColorado Plateau Network in Moab, UT. She was formerly the Natural Areas Program Manager for the Rocky Mountain Research Station, Northern Region and lntermountain Region of the USDA Forest Service. Melinda Moeur is Research Forester with the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain ResearchStation in Moscow, ID, and one of four Research Natural Areas Coordinators from the Rocky Mountain Research Station. J. Stephen Shelly is Regional Botanist and Research Natural Areas Coordinator with the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region Headquarters Office in Missoula, MT.
  • Lincoln National Forest

    Lincoln National Forest

    Chapter 1: Introduction In Ecological and Biological Diversity of National Forests in Region 3 Bruce Vander Lee, Ruth Smith, and Joanna Bate The Nature Conservancy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We summarized existing regional-scale biological and ecological assessment information from Arizona and New Mexico for use in the development of Forest Plans for the eleven National Forests in USDA Forest Service Region 3 (Region 3). Under the current Planning Rule, Forest Plans are to be strategic documents focusing on ecological, economic, and social sustainability. In addition, Region 3 has identified restoration of the functionality of fire-adapted systems as a central priority to address forest health issues. Assessments were selected for inclusion in this report based on (1) relevance to Forest Planning needs with emphasis on the need to address ecosystem diversity and ecological sustainability, (2) suitability to address restoration of Region 3’s major vegetation systems, and (3) suitability to address ecological conditions at regional scales. We identified five assessments that addressed the distribution and current condition of ecological and biological diversity within Region 3. We summarized each of these assessments to highlight important ecological resources that exist on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico: • Extent and distribution of potential natural vegetation types in Arizona and New Mexico • Distribution and condition of low-elevation grasslands in Arizona • Distribution of stream reaches with native fish occurrences in Arizona • Species richness and conservation status attributes for all species on National Forests in Arizona and New Mexico • Identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation from Ecoregional Assessments from Arizona and New Mexico Analyses of available assessments were completed across all management jurisdictions for Arizona and New Mexico, providing a regional context to illustrate the biological and ecological importance of National Forests in Region 3.
  • Socioeconomic Assessment for the Tonto National Forest

    Socioeconomic Assessment for the Tonto National Forest

    4. Access and Travel Patterns This section examines historic and current factors affecting access patterns and transportation infrastructure within the four counties surrounding Tonto National Forest (TNF). The information gathered is intended to outline current and future trends in forest access as well as potential barriers to access encountered by various user groups. Primary sources of data on access and travel patterns for the state’s national forests include the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), the Arizona Department of Commerce (ADOC), and the circulation elements of individual county comprehensive plans. Indicators used to assess access and travel patterns include existing road networks and planned improvements, trends in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on major roadways, seasonal traffic flows, and county transportation planning priorities. Additional input on internal access issues has been sought directly from forest planning staff. Various sources of information for the area surrounding TNF cite the difficulty of transportation planning in the region given its vast geographic scale, population growth, pace of development, and constrained transportation funding. In an effort to respond effectively to such challenges, local and regional planning authorities stress the importance of linking transportation planning with preferred land uses. Data show that the area surrounding Tonto National Forest saw relatively large increases in VMT between 1990 and 2000, mirroring the region’s relatively strong population growth over the same period. Information gathered from the Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) and county comprehensive plans suggest that considerable improvements are currently scheduled for the region’s transportation network, particularly when compared to areas surrounding Arizona’s other national forests.
  • Sl N 06 [Converted]

    Sl N 06 [Converted]

    PROHIBITIONS OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES PURPOSE AND CONTENTS OF THIS MAP It is prohibited to possess or operate an over-snow Operating a motor vehicle on National Forest System motor vehicle on the FLATHEAD NATIONAL FOREST ALL TRAVEL INFORMATION ON THIS MAP PERTAINS TO This map shows National Forest System roads, roads, National Forest System trails, and in areas on other than in accordance with these designations (36 OVER SNOW VEHICLE USE ONLY National Forest System trails, and areas on National National Forest System lands carries a greater respon- CFR 261.14), as per the Swan Lake Over Snow Forest System lands in the Swan Lake Ranger District sibility than operating that vehicle in a city or other Vehicle Use Map. and adjacent areas where use by over-snow vehicles developed setting. Not only must the vehicle operators FLATHEAD NATIONAL FOREST is allowed, restricted, or prohibited pursuant to 36 know and follow all applicable traffic laws, but they Violations of 36 CFR 261.14 are subject to a fine of up CFR 212.81. need to show concern for the environment as well as to $5,000 or imprisonment for up to 6 months or both SWAN LAKE other forest users. The misuse of motor vehicles can (18 U.S.C. 3571(e)). This prohibition applies regard- Designation of a road, trail, or area for over-snow lead to the temporary or permanent closure of any less of the presence or absence of signs. RANGER DISTRICT motor vehicle use should not be interpreted as designated road, trail, or area. Operators of motor encouraging or inviting use, or to imply that the road, vehicles are subject to State traffic law, including State This map does not display non-motorized uses and 2011 trail, or area is passable, or safe for travel.
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological

    United States Department of the Interior Geological

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of national forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Montana Compiled by Christopher E. Williams 1 and Robert C. Pearson2 Open-File Report 84-637 1984 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Present address 2 Denver, Colorado U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/NEIC Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 128-131) Page Introduction*........................................................... 1 Beaverhead National Forest............................................... 2 North Big Hole (1-001).............................................. 2 West Pioneer (1-006)................................................ 2 Eastern Pioneer Mountains (1-008)................................... 3 Middle Mountain-Tobacco Root (1-013)................................ 4 Potosi (1-014)...................................................... 5 Madison/Jack Creek Basin (1-549).................................... 5 West Big Hole (1-943)............................................... 6 Italian Peak (1-945)................................................ 7 Garfield Mountain (1-961)........................................... 7 Mt. Jefferson (1-962)............................................... 8 Bitterroot National Forest.............................................. 9 Stony Mountain (LI-BAD)............................................. 9 Allan Mountain (Ll-YAG)............................................
  • USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021

    USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021

    1 USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021 Alabama Tuskegee, National Forests in Alabama, dates 6/6/2021--8/13/2021, Project Contact: Darrius Truss, [email protected] 404-550-5114 Double Springs, National Forests in Alabama, 6/6/2021--8/13/2021, Project Contact: Shane Hoskins, [email protected] 334-314- 4522 Alaska Juneau, Tongass National Forest / Admiralty Island National Monument, 6/14/2021--8/13/2021 Project Contact: Don MacDougall, [email protected] 907-789-6280 Arizona Douglas, Coronado National Forest, 6/13/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contacts: Doug Ruppel and Brian Stultz, [email protected] and [email protected] 520-388-8438 Prescott, Prescott National Forest, 6/13/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contact: Nina Hubbard, [email protected] 928- 232-0726 Phoenix, Tonto National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/25/2021, Project Contact: Brooke Wheelock, [email protected] 602-225-5257 Arkansas Glenwood, Ouachita National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/30/2021, Project Contact: Bill Jackson, [email protected] 501-701-3570 Mena, Ouachita National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/30/2021, Project Contact: Bill Jackson, [email protected] 501- 701-3570 California Mount Shasta, Shasta Trinity National Forest, 6/28/2021--8/6/2021, Project Contact: Marcus Nova, [email protected] 530-926-9606 Etna, Klamath National Forest, 6/7/2021--7/31/2021, Project Contact: Jeffrey Novak, [email protected] 530-841- 4467 USDA Forest Service Youth Conservation Corps Projects 2021 2 Colorado Grand Junction, Grand Mesa Uncomphagre and Gunnison National Forests, 6/7/2021--8/14/2021 Project Contact: Lacie Jurado, [email protected] 970-817-4053, 2 projects.