DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (HANSARD)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates (HANSARD) Parliamentary Debates (HANSARD) THIRTY-NINTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION 2013 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Thursday, 12 December 2013 Legislative Council Thursday, 12 December 2013 THE PRESIDENT (Hon Barry House) took the chair at 10.00 am, and read prayers. WESTMINSTER PRIMARY SCHOOL — ART SPECIALIST TEACHER Petition HON SUE ELLERY (South Metropolitan — Leader of the Opposition) [10.02 am]: I present a petition containing one signature that is couched in the following terms — To the President and Members of the Legislative Council of the Parliament of Western Australia in Parliament assembled. We the undersigned parents and citizens of Westminster Junior Primary and Primary School support quality public education which offers opportunities for the children of our schools to develop a variety of educational and life skills. The Art Specialist Teacher at Westminster Primary School is integral to the ongoing success of the Art program at the school and is at threat of having to leave because she is not a permanent employee of the education department. This would be a loss to the school and to the Education Department and your petitioners therefore respectfully request the Legislative Council to recommend to the Minister for Education that Ms Cutler, the Art teacher at Westminster Primary School be retained, And your petitioners as in duty bound, will ever pray. [See paper 1146.] SECTION 57 REVIEW OF THE OPERATIONS OF THE CORONERS ACT 1996 AND STRATEGIC REVIEW OF THE OFFICE OF THE STATE CORONER Statement by Attorney General HON MICHAEL MISCHIN (North Metropolitan — Attorney General) [10.03 am]: This ministerial statement introduces to state Parliament two reports undertaken by AOT Consulting Pty Ltd—namely, the section 57 review of the operations of the Coroners Act 1996 and the strategic review of the Office of the State Coroner. The two documents are essentially interrelated and should be read in conjunction with each other. By way of background, in 2008 the Law Reform Commission of Western Australia was commissioned by the then Attorney General, Hon Jim McGinty, to undertake a review of coronial practices and procedures in Western Australia with a view to highlighting any areas that may be in need of reform. In February 2012, the former Attorney General Hon Christian Porter tabled the Law Reform Commission’s final report in Parliament. It contained 113 recommendations and provided a principled approach to reform by addressing concerns communicated by members of the public and other stakeholders. Although the majority of recommendations concerned legislative reform or clarification, a number of them invited reforms to practices and policies of both the Office of the State Coroner and other agencies concerned with the delivery of coronial services in Western Australia. In March 2012, the former Attorney General was informed of the Department of the Attorney General’s strategy for implementing these recommendations. Central to that strategy was the engagement of an independent consultant to undertake a strategic review of the Office of the State Coroner. In addition to the strategic review, it was also agreed that the consultants would simultaneously undertake a section 57 review of the operations of the Coroners Act 1996. Section 57 of the Coroners Act 1996 requires me to carry out a review of the operations of the act after every fifth anniversary of its commencement. Section 57 requires that a review consider and have regard to — (a) the attainment of the objects of this Act; (b) the administration of this Act; (c) the effectiveness of the operation of the court; and (d) such other matters as appear to be relevant to the operation and effectiveness of this Act. The Department of the Attorney General engaged AOT Consulting Pty Ltd in May 2012 to undertake both the strategic review and the section 57 review. The strategic review was completed in mid-November 2012 and the section 57 review was completed in December 2012. The section 57 review was aided by the Law Reform [COUNCIL — Thursday, 12 December 2013] 7665 Commission report. As mentioned, that report contained 113 recommendations, 66 of which were identified as being directly relevant for consideration in the section 57 review. Other recommendations of the Law Reform Commission report were either directly relevant to, partially relevant to, or commented on in the strategic review and, therefore, had varying degrees of relevance to the section 57 review. In addition, the strategic review had made a further 27 recommendations. The section 57 review concluded, in effect, that the current level of coronial processes, and, by inference, the administration of the act, goes some way to meeting the objects of the act. However, regarding the effectiveness of the court, the current model is unlikely to be sustainable without some changes. In that respect, the five recommendations of the section 57 review advise that consideration be given to rewriting the Coroners Act 1996; consideration be given to restructuring the Coroners Act 1996 to be better aligned to the coronial processes; consideration be given by Parliamentary Counsel to further defining the administrative responsibilities of the Coroners Act 1996 as part of the proposed legislative project; the views expressed by the State Coroner and the Deputy State Coroner be taken into consideration by Parliamentary Counsel as part of the proposed legislative project; and the recommendations of the strategic review be implemented. In summary, the section 57 review, together with the Law Reform Commission report and the strategic review, provides a unique opportunity for the Office of the State Coroner to implement change that will improve the coronial services available to the community of Western Australia. I will deal with the current status. Critical to the implementation of these recommendations was government’s confirmation in the 2013–14 budget process of recurrent funding of the existing substantive and temporary additional resources available to the court. This provided the Office of the State Coroner with an improved level of certainty and it facilitates reform. The additional resources have also seen a significant reduction in the cases backlog, particularly administrative findings, from a high of 916 in December 2011 to 416 in September 2013. Finalisations continue to improve, and for the second consecutive year finalisations exceeded the total number of cases received, with 2 217 cases finalised in 2012–13. The State Coroner and the Department of the Attorney General are essentially in agreement with the direction of the strategic review and the section 57 review. The primary objective behind the recommendations of the strategic review is to improve the timely resolution of coronial cases by reducing the end-to-end cycle times, processing times and wait times, and improving the effective use of resources. The review’s proposed increase and reconfiguration of resources, together with the proposed recommendations, are calculated to achieve this objective. As Attorney General, I have agreed to a proposal to implement a three-year reform strategy for the Office of the State Coroner. This approach will see the successful implementation of the agreed recommendations of the strategic review, the section 57 review and the Law Reform Commission report over this time line. Year 1, 2013–14, will see a continued focus on backlog, particularly inquest cases; the commencement of a legislative project to amend the Coroners Act 1996, to draft new regulations or amendments to the Coroners Regulations, and to provide for rules of court and the power to publish practice directions; and the implementation of an information management strategy to support the Coroner’s Court, including updating the court’s website, and electronic document records management, including the implementation of a case- management system as part of the e-courts, which is the integrated court management system. Year 2, 2014–15, will see improvements to service through changes to the way that coronial services are delivered and through exploring better practices in relation to coronial counselling in regional WA; and the implementation of education and training programs linked to e-learning capabilities already available within the Department of the Attorney General. Year 3, 2015–16, will see the establishment of the WA coronial system governance group, the implementation of a revised organisational structure and the implementation of a revised framework of performance indicators. In conclusion, I wish to reiterate that the section 57 review, together with the Law Reform Commission’s report and strategic review, provide a unique opportunity for the Office of the State Coroner to enhance and improve coronial services in Western Australia. I am confident that the three-year reform strategy proposed by the Department of the Attorney General will see the successful implementation of the agreed recommendations of the strategic review, the section 57 review and the Law Reform Commission’s report. I take the opportunity to table both the “Strategic Review of the Office of the State Coroner”, dated 26 November 2012, and the “Section 57 Review Coroners Act 1996”, dated 12 December 2012, both by AOT Consulting Pty Ltd. [See papers 1147 and 1148.] LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL DELEGATION — VISIT TO MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE Statement by President THE PRESIDENT (Hon Barry House): I have a report of the Legislative Council delegation to Malaysia and Singapore, November 2013. I would just like to make some comments about that report. This is a different sort of report. In the interests of openness and accountability, I have taken the view that parliamentary delegation 7666 [COUNCIL — Thursday, 12 December 2013] travel should be reported to the house in more detail than a brief mention in the annual report. During my tenure as President, I have tried to introduce travel to key destinations, involving members who are representative across the chamber as a key way the Legislative Council can play its part in promoting Western Australia, building parliamentary partnerships and providing professional development for members and this institution.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Still Anti-Asian? Anti-Chinese? One Nation Policies on Asian Immigration and Multiculturalism
    Still Anti-Asian? Anti-Chinese? One Nation policies on Asian immigration and multiculturalism 仍然反亚裔？反华裔？ 一国党针对亚裔移民和多元文化 的政策 Is Pauline Hanson’s One Nation party anti-Asian? Just how much has One Nation changed since Pauline Hanson first sat in the Australian Parliament two decades ago? This report reviews One Nation’s statements of the 1990s and the current policies of the party. It concludes that One Nation’s broad policies on immigration and multiculturalism remain essentially unchanged. Anti-Asian sentiments remain at One Nation’s core. Continuity in One Nation policy is reinforced by the party’s connections with anti-Asian immigration campaigners from the extreme right of Australian politics. Anti-Chinese thinking is a persistent sub-text in One Nation’s thinking and policy positions. The possibility that One Nation will in the future turn its attacks on Australia's Chinese communities cannot be dismissed. 宝林·韩森的一国党是否反亚裔？自从宝林·韩森二十年前首次当选澳大利亚 议会议员以来，一国党改变了多少？ 本报告回顾了一国党在二十世纪九十年代的声明以及该党的现行政策。报告 得出的结论显示，一国党关于移民和多元文化的广泛政策基本保持不变。反 亚裔情绪仍然居于一国党的核心。通过与来自澳大利亚极右翼政坛的反亚裔 移民竞选人的联系，一国党的政策连续性得以加强。反华裔思想是一国党思 想和政策立场的一个持久不变的潜台词。无法排除一国党未来攻击澳大利亚 华人社区的可能性。 Report Philip Dorling May 2017 ABOUT THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra. It is funded by donations from philanthropic trusts and individuals and commissioned research. Since its launch in 1994, the Institute has carried out highly influential research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues. OUR PHILOSOPHY As we begin the 21st century, new dilemmas confront our society and our planet. Unprecedented levels of consumption co-exist with extreme poverty. Through new technology we are more connected than we have ever been, yet civic engagement is declining.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australian-Asian Connection: from Alfred Deakin to John Howard
    THE AUSTRALIAN-ASIAN CONNECTION: FROM ALFRED DEAKIN TO JOHN HOWARD Laksiri Jayasuriya University of Western Australia Introduction: Contextualizing Australia in Asia Several commentators have seized upon Australia’s recent entry to the inner sanctum of East Asian Summit as a turning point in Australia’s relationship with is regional neighbours. This goes to the heart of what I have termed the ‘Australian-Asian Connection’, or as others have called it, the Asian Engagement or Enmeshment. We indeed have come a long way since the historian La Nauze dismissed Australia’s proximity to Asia as something for the future (Walker 2003) As we ponder the significance of joining the East Asian Summit, many questions come to mind: does this signify a radical change in Australia’s view of itself? Is this the answer or a clue to the critical question whether Australia sees itself as an ‘Asian nation’ with a firm link to an Asian regional hegemon, or that Australia now embraces more firmly a duality – i.e., as an ‘Asian nation as well as a European nation’ (Collins 1985, 391). If, indeed there has been a change in how we comprehend the Australian-Asian connection, what underlies this sudden embrace of an ‘Asian future’ by none other than John Howard who in the past was forthright in his criticism of the regional policies in the Hawke and Keating era h (Dalrymple 2003). This becomes a perplexing query, particularly when one recalls that Foreign Minister Downer has stated that Australia had no wish to be part of a new regionalism such as that portrayed by Mahathir and others.
    [Show full text]
  • CLEAN ENERGY ACT 2011 (Cth) V RENEWABLE ENERGY (ELECTRICITY) ACT 2000 (Cth)
    A TALE OF TWO TAXES: CLEAN ENERGY ACT 2011 (Cth) v RENEWABLE ENERGY (ELECTRICITY) ACT 2000 (Cth) ALEXANDER ROBERT (‘LEX’) FULLARTON* 01 June 2018 * M Com (Curtin), PhD (UNSW), Adjunct Professor, Curtin Business School, Curtin University, Lex.Fullarton@ curtin.edu.au. Lex Fullarton is a former provincial tax practitioner and is also a solar farmer as well as an accredited agent and solar pv installation designer with the Australian Clean Energy Regulator. Abstract Firstly, this paper defines a tax to establish a definition of a carbon tax and then examines the Clean Energy Act 2011 (Cth) (CE Act), which is considered to be a carbon tax. Secondly, it examines the Australian Renewable Energy (Electricity) Act 2000 (Cth) (REE Act) to ascertain if it functions as a tax on greenhouse gas emissions and is therefore also a carbon tax. It examines both pieces of legislation to compare and contrast them to establish the view that the REE Act is not a quota based system to limit greenhouse gas emissions (a ‘cap and trade’ system) but rather it is a carbon tax system. To do that the paper investigates various definitions of tax. It compares those definitions with the legislative intent and functions of the REE Act to answer the question – is the REE Act a carbon tax system? It concludes that the provisions of the REE Act function as a form of carbon tax. It also concludes that tax revenue, sourced from an excise on fossil fuel generated electricity, is specifically directed by government to a particular purpose – the revenue is hypothecated to support the burgeoning renewable energy industry in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Action: Paying Polluters to Halt Global Warming?
    Chapter 3 The Clean Energy Package and the impact of its proposed repeal Policy background 3.1 On 27 September 2010, Prime Minister the Hon Julia Gillard announced that a Multi-Party Climate Change Committee (MPCC) would be established to explore options for implementing a carbon price and to build consensus on how Australia will tackle the challenge of climate change.1 3.2 The MPCC was chaired by the Prime Minister and was comprised of members of the Australian Labor Party, the Australian Greens and independent members of the House of Representatives, Mr Tony Windsor and Mr Rob Oakeshott. The committee was assisted by a panel of expert advisers including Ms Patricia Faulkner AO, Professor Ross Garnaut AO, Mr Rod Sims and Professor Will Steffen.2 3.3 On 10 July 2011, the MPCC released the Clean Energy Agreement (the Agreement) to reduce carbon pollution.3 In the Agreement the MPCC recognised that 'cuts in global pollution are necessary to reduce the risks posed by unmitigated climate change'.4 It noted that for Australia, 'these risks are large, threatening our economy, our natural heritage (including icons such as the World Heritage listed Great Barrier Reef), food security, and our way of life'.5 3.4 The Agreement recommended that a broad based carbon price be introduced into Australia commencing from 1 July 2012 with a fixed price before transitioning to 1 Department of Environment, Feature: Multi-Party Climate Change Committee, http://www.climatechange.gov.au/about-us/annual-reports/annual-report-2010-11/feature- multi-party-climate-change-committee (accessed 24 February 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Victoria Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL FIFTY-NINTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION WEDNESDAY, 4 AUGUST 2021 hansard.parliament.vic.gov.au By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable LINDA DESSAU, AC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable KEN LAY, AO, APM The ministry Premier........................................................ The Hon. DM Andrews, MP Deputy Premier, Minister for Education and Minister for Mental Health .. The Hon. JA Merlino, MP Attorney-General and Minister for Emergency Services .............. The Hon. J Symes, MLC Minister for Transport Infrastructure and Minister for the Suburban Rail Loop ....................................................... The Hon. JM Allan, MP Minister for Training and Skills and Minister for Higher Education .... The Hon. GA Tierney, MLC Treasurer, Minister for Economic Development and Minister for Industrial Relations ........................................... The Hon. TH Pallas, MP Minister for Public Transport and Minister for Roads and Road Safety . The Hon. BA Carroll, MP Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change and Minister for Solar Homes ................................................ The Hon. L D’Ambrosio, MP Minister for Child Protection and Minister for Disability, Ageing and Carers ...................................................... The Hon. LA Donnellan, MP Minister for Health, Minister for Ambulance Services and Minister for Equality .................................................... The Hon. MP
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Clean Energy Act: a New Measure in the Global Carbon Market Bruno Zeller Dr
    Loyola University Chicago International Law Review Volume 10 Article 4 Issue 2 Spring/Summer 2013 2013 Australia's Clean Energy Act: A New Measure in the Global Carbon Market Bruno Zeller Dr. Assoc. Prof. , Victoria University Michael Longo Dr. Assoc. Prof., Victoria Law School, Victoria University Follow this and additional works at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/lucilr Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Bruno Zeller Dr. & Michael Longo Dr. Australia's Clean Energy Act: A New Measure in the Global Carbon Market, 10 Loy. U. Chi. Int'l L. Rev. 179 (2013). Available at: http://lawecommons.luc.edu/lucilr/vol10/iss2/4 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by LAW eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola University Chicago International Law Review by an authorized administrator of LAW eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AUSTRALIA'S CLEAN ENERGY ACT: A NEW MEASURE IN THE GLOBAL CARBON MARKET Dr. Bruno Zeller & Dr. Michael Longo' I. Introduction. ......................................... 179 II. The Australian Legislation .............................. 180 III. Outline of the Act............. ............... ...... 187 IV. Liable Entities and Covered Emissions ..................... 89 V. Pollution Caps and Emission Units........................ 190 VI. Trading of Units ..................................... 192 VII. Jobs and Competitiveness Program .. ...................... 193 VIII. Conclusion. ......................................... 196 I. Introduction The compromise reached at Durban on December 11, 2011 ("Durban Compro- mise") on a climate action roadmap committed states to negotiating a legal agree- ment by 2015, which would prospectively come into force in 2020. It represents a limited success on the international stage.
    [Show full text]
  • GHG Mitigation in Australia: an Overview of the Current Policy Landscape
    Working Paper GHG MITIGATION IN AUSTRALIA: AN OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT POLICY LANDSCAPE OLIVIA KEMBER AND ERWIN JACKSON WITH MERRY CHANDRA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONTENTS This report outlines Australia’s policy framework for Executive Summary..............................................................1 greenhouse gas emissions reduction, identifies areas of potential change in the near term, and attempts to Key Metrics ..........................................................................3 evaluate the impact of current policies on Australia’s I: International Statements of Future GHG Mitigation ...........4 emissions trajectory to 2020. It assesses Australia’s II: Relevant Government Institutions and Legal Authorities ...7 international commitments, and the major policies of III: Overview of Major Policies .............................................8 federal and state institutions to reduce emissions. It also assesses the likely success of these policies in achieving IV: GHG Projections ...........................................................19 Australia’s emissions reduction goals. V: Looking Ahead ...............................................................22 Abbreviations and Acronyms ..............................................24 Australia has bipartisan political support for its interna- References ..........................................................................24 tional commitment to reduce emissions by 5–25 percent from 2000 levels by 2020 (see Box 1), but very little Endnotes ...........................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2011–12
    Clean Energy Regulator Energy Clean 2011–12 Annual Report 2011–12 Annual Report 2011–12 Published by the Clean Energy Regulator ISSN 2200–937X © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/. The Clean Energy Regulator asserts the right to be recognised as author of the original material in the following manner. © Commonwealth of Australia (Clean Energy Regulator) 2012 Edited by WordsWorth Writing Design and typesetting by Cre8ive Printed by Millennium Print Pty Ltd Contact us Mail GPO Box 621 Canberra ACT 2601 Phone 1300 553 542 if calling within Australia +61 2 6159 3100 if calling from overseas 13 14 50 translating and interpreting service 133 677 TTY service 1300 555 727 speak and listen service Email [email protected] Website www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au More information about this report Manager Governance and Reporting Corporate Services Division Clean Energy Regulator Phone: 02 6159 3100 Email: [email protected] A copy of this document can be accessed via the Clean Energy Regulator’s website, www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au. Office of the Chair The Hon Greg Combet AM MP Minister for Climate Change and Energy Efficiency Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Minister I am pleased to submit the Annual Report for the Clean Energy Regulator in accordance with subsection 40(1) of the Clean Energy Regulator Act 2011 for presentation to the Parliament. The report covers the operations of the Clean Energy Regulator for the financial year ended 30 June 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensepublishers Multiauthor Stylefile
    Fair Go Mate and Un-Australian: Australian Socio-Political Vernacular Author Kerwin, Dale Published 2010 Book Title The Havoc of Capitalism: Publics, Pedagogies and Environmental Crisis Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/34981 Link to published version https://www.sensepublishers.com/catalogs/bookseries/bold-visions-in-educational-research/the- havoc-of-capitalism/ Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au DALE KERWIN FAIR GO MATE AND UNAUSTRALIAN: AUSTRALIAN SOCIO-POLITICAL VENACULAR In the age of the neo-conservative politics of John Howard’s Federal coalition government the individual and family became responsible for welfare rather than the government. John Howard’s Federal coalition government took a hard line ap- proach to spending on welfare priorities and this marked an ideological shift from previous federal governments’ universal policy of providing a safety net for all. Through an economical rationalist vein John Howard imposed unrealistic measures on the whole of the Australian society. This shift took away individual rights and it can be argued that the change to welfare provision impacted on Australian Abo- riginal peoples autonomy. This paper will, exam the discourses of welfare and what it means to Australian Aboriginal people within the rhetoric of self determi- nation, equality, human rights and equal justice in Australian law. As John Howard the Australian prime minister stated in 2006 “you get nothing for nothing.” At the present time in Australia and a year before a Federal election of 2007 each State and Territory in Australia is governed by the Labor Party, and the Lib- eral led coalition of the John Howard Government governs the Commonwealth of Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia: a Cultural History (Third Edition)
    AUSTRALIA A CULTURAL HISTORY THIRD EDITION JOHN RICKARD AUSTRALIA Australia A CULTURAL HISTORY Third Edition John Rickard Australia: A Cultural History (Third Edition) © Copyright 2017 John Rickard All rights reserved. Apart from any uses permitted by Australia’s Copyright Act 1968, no part of this book may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the copyright owners. Inquiries should be directed to the publisher. Monash University Publishing Matheson Library and Information Services Building 40 Exhibition Walk Monash University Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia www.publishing.monash.edu Monash University Publishing brings to the world publications which advance the best traditions of humane and enlightened thought. Monash University Publishing titles pass through a rigorous process of independent peer review. www.publishing.monash.edu/books/ach-9781921867606.html Series: Australian History Series Editor: Sean Scalmer Design: Les Thomas Cover image: Aboriginal demonstrators protesting at the re-enactment of the First Fleet. The tall ships enter Sydney Harbour with the Harbour Bridge in the background on 26 January 1988 during the Bicentenary celebrations. Published in Sydney Morning Herald 26 January, 1988. Courtesy Fairfax Media Syndication, image FXJ24142. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry: Creator: Rickard, John, author. Title: Australia : a cultural history / John Rickard. Edition: Third Edition ISBN: 9781921867606 (paperback) Subjects: Australia--History. Australia--Civilization. Australia--Social conditions. ISBN (print): 9781921867606 ISBN (PDF): 9781921867613 First published 1988 Second edition 1996 In memory of John and Juan ABOUT THE AUTHOR John Rickard is the author of two prize-winning books, Class and Politics: New South Wales, Victoria and the Early Commonwealth, 1890-1910 and H.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Imagining Australia: Migration, Culture, Diversity
    Re-imagining Australia: Migration, culture, diversity Practical suggestions on the challenges and opportunities ahead Re-imagining Australia: Migration, culture, diversity Practical suggestions on the challenges and opportunities ahead Re-imagining Australia: Migration, culture, diversity Practical suggestions on the challenges and opportunities ahead Essays by Anne Aly, Colin Barnett, Farida Fozdar, Geoff Gallop, Paul J. Maginn, Mike Nahan, Juliet Pietsch, Benjamin Reilly, Shamit Saggar, Samina Yasmeen, Edward Zhang Edited by Shamit Saggar and Anna Zenz Copyright © the authors; used with permission. These works are copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, criticism or review, as permitted by the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Any view or opinion expressed in this publication is that of its author, and does not necessarily represent the position of the author’s affiliate organisations, The University of Western Australia or UWA Public Policy Institute. First published in 2020 by: UWA Public Policy Institute The University of Western Australia M475, 35 Stirling Highway CRAWLEY WA 6009 Design, typesetting and printing: UniPrint, The University of Western Australia. ISBN: 978-1-74052-978-5 Contents Foreword 7 Jane den Hollander, Vice-Chancellor Introduction 9 Shamit Saggar Combatting radicalisation in Australia 13 Anne Aly What middle Australia might think about immigration 21 Colin Barnett Community cohesion choices 25 Farida Fozdar Democracy, human rights
    [Show full text]
  • John Howard's Federalism
    John Howard, Economic Liberalism, Social Conservatism and Australian Federalism Author Hollander, Robyn Published 2008 Journal Title Australian Journal of Politics and History DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8497.2008.00486.x Copyright Statement © 2008 Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. The definitive version is available at www.interscience.wiley.com Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/22355 Link to published version http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0004-9522&site=1 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au 1 John Howard, Economic Liberalism, Social Conservatism and Australian Federalism This paper examines the way in which John Howard’s values have shaped his approach to federalism. Howard identifies himself as an economic liberal and a social conservative. and the paper traces the impact of this stance on Australian federalism. It shows how they have resulted in an increasing accretion of power to the centre and a further marginalisation of the States. The paper finds that Howard’s commitments to small government and a single market unimpeded by state borders have important consequences for federal arrangements as has his lack of sympathy with regional identity. Federalism is central to Australian political life. It is a defining institution which has shaped the nation’s political evolution.1 The founders’ conception of a nation composed of strong autonomous States, each with their own independent source of income and expansive sphere of responsibility has never been realised, if indeed it was ever intended and over time power has shifted, almost inexorably, to the centre.
    [Show full text]